Summary: Ref T6256, this prevents more installs from getting in this weird state. We'll have to follow up if possible to "fix" the issue retroactively.
Test Plan: Test moving a backlog column to new position, hiding rest of other panels.
Reviewers: btrahan, epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: Korvin, epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T6256
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10651
Summary:
Ref T2787. Builds on D10649 by rebining existing objects (carts, charges, etc) to merchantPHIDs and providerPHIDs instead of an implicit global merchant and weird global artifacts (providerType / providerKey).
Basically:
- When you create something that users can pay for, you specify a merchant to control where the payment goes.
- Accounts are install-wide, but payment methods are bound to merchants. This seems to do a reasonable job of balancing usability and technical concerns.
- Replace a bunch of weird links between objects with standard PHIDs.
- Improve "add payment method" flow.
Test Plan: Went through the Fund flow with Stripe and WePay, funding an initiative.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T2787
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10652
Summary:
Ref T2787. Instead of making providers global configuration, make them a thing on merchants with web configuration.
Payment methods and some of the pyament workflow needs to be retooled a bit after this, but this seemed like a reasonable cutoff point for this diff.
Test Plan: See screenshots.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T2787
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10649
Summary:
Ref T2787. Currently, you add payment providers (Stripe, Paypal, etc) in global configuration.
Generally, this approach is cumbersome, limiting, and often hard for users to figure out. It also doesn't provide a natural way to segment payment receivers or provide web access to administrative payment functions like issuing refunds, canceling orders, etc. I think that stuff definitely needs to be in the web UI, and the rule for access to it can't reasonably just be "all administrators" in a lot of reasonable cases.
The only real advantage is that it prevents an attacker from adjusting settings and pointing something at an account they control. But this attack can be mitigated through notifications, some sort of CLI-only merchant lock, payment accounts being relatively identifiable, etc.
So introduce "merchants", which are basically payable entities. An individual merchant will have attached Paypal, Stripe, etc., accounts, and access rules. When you buy something in an application, the merchant to pay is also specified. They also provide an umbrella for dealing with permissions down the line.
This may get a //little// cumbersome because if there are several merchants your saved card information is not shared across them. I think that will be fine in the normal case (most installs will have only one merchant). Even if it isn't and we leave providers global, I think introducing this is the right call from a web UI / permissions point of view. I'll play around with it in the next couple of diffs and figure out exactly where the line goes.
Test Plan: Listed, created, edited, viewed merchants.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T2787
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10648
Summary:
Ref T2787. These were still stuck in the stone ages.
(The handles are pretty skeletal but most aren't used anywehre.)
Test Plan: Funded an initiative without anything breaking. Grepped for removed constants.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T2787
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10647
Summary: Ref T2787. Like Stripe, this one is pretty easy to get working correctly on the "good" path and fataling out in a safe way on bad paths.
Test Plan: Funded an initiative with Balanced.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T2787
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10645
Summary:
Ref T2787. For test charges, Paypal is putting the charge in a "payment review" state. Dealing with this state requires way more infrastructure than other providers: we're supposed to pause delivery, then poll Paypal every 6 hours to see if the review has resolved.
Since I can't seem to generate normal test charges, I can't test Paypal for now. Disable it until we have more infrastructure.
(This diff gets us further along, up to the point where I hit this issue.)
Test Plan: Read documentation, rolled eyes.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T2787
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10644
Summary:
Ref T2787. This basically already works correctly since the hard logic is external to the provider on API providers. Tweak a couple of things.
Failures still just fail the cart completely, for now.
Test Plan: Completed a charge with Stripe.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T2787
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10640
Summary:
Ref T2787. This doesn't get all the edge cases quite correct, but is generally a safe, complete payment workflow:
- Shares the actual charging state logic.
- Makes it appropriately stateful with locking and transactions.
- Gets the main flow correct.
- Detects failure cases, just tends to blow up rather than help the user resolve them.
Test Plan:
- Charged with WePay.
- Charged with Infinite Free Money.
- Resumed an abandoned cart.
- Hit all failure states where we just dead-end the cart. Not ideal, but (seemingly) complete/safe/correct.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T2787
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10639
Summary: Ref T2787. Similar to D10634, give applications more control over the cart workflow. For now this just means they get to pick exit URIs, but in the future they can manage more details of cart behavior.
Test Plan: Funded an initiative and got returned to the initiative instead of dead-ending in Phortune.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T2787
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10638
Summary: without escapage here, creating databases fails. Fixes T6251.
Test Plan: ran the command CREATE DATABASE foo COLLATION binary and it failed; ran the command CREATE DATABASE foo2 COLLATION "binary" and it worked; trusting that the %T still works as advertised.
Reviewers: chad, epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: Korvin, epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T6251
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10641
Summary: Fixes T6254 and renames status as string. Though maybe this should go through `formatStringConstants`?
Test Plan: Reload Conduit page, see new text.
Reviewers: btrahan, epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: Korvin, epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T6254
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10637
Summary:
Ref T2787. When a user purchases a product in Phortune, transition the cart through a purchased state and invoke product callbacks so applications can respond to the workflow.
Also shore up some stuff like preventing negative amounts of funding.
Test Plan: Backed an initiative and saw it show up on the initiative after completing the purcahsing workflow.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T2787
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10635
Summary: Ref T2787. `Product` is currently a fairly heavy object, but as Phortune develops it makes a lot of sense to make it a lighter object and put more product logic in applications. Convert it into a fairly lightweight reference to applications. The idea is that Phortune is mostly providing a cart flow, and applications manage the details of products.
Test Plan: Funded an initiative for $1.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T2787
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10634
Summary:
Ref T2787. Phortune currently stores a bunch of stuff as `...inUSDCents`. This ends up being pretty cumbersome and I worry it will create a huge headache down the road (and possibly not that far off if we do Coinbase/Bitcoin soon). Even now, it's more of a pain than I figured it would be.
Instead:
- Provide an application-level serialization mechanism.
- Provide currency serialization.
- Store currency in an abstract way (currently, as "1.23 USD") that can handle currencies in the future.
- Change all `...inUSDCents` to `..asCurrency`.
- This generally simplifies all the application code.
- Also remove some columns which don't make sense or don't make sense anymore. Notably, `Product` is going to get more abstract and mostly be provided by applications.
Test Plan:
- Created a new product.
- Purchased a product.
- Backed an initiative.
- Ran unit tests.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T2787
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10633
Summary: Ref T1191. We don't create new databases with appropriate collation yet.
Test Plan:
Created a new database and saw it issue:
```
>>> [10] <query> CREATE DATABASE IF NOT EXISTS `phabricator2_testo` COLLATE utf8mb4_bin
```
Reviewers: btrahan, hach-que
Reviewed By: hach-que
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T1191
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10632
Summary:
Ref T4209. This creates storage for public keys against authorized hosts, such that servers can be authorized to make Conduit calls as the omnipotent user.
Servers are registered into this system by running the following command once:
```
bin/almanac register
```
NOTE: This doesn't implement authorization between servers, just the storage of public keys.
Placing this against Almanac seemed like the most sensible place, since I'm imagining in future that the `register` command will accept more information (like the hostname of the server so it can be found in the service directory).
Test Plan: Ran `bin/almanac register` and saw the host (and public key information) appear in the database.
Reviewers: #blessed_reviewers, epriestley
Reviewed By: #blessed_reviewers, epriestley
Subscribers: epriestley, Korvin
Maniphest Tasks: T4209
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10400
Summary: Fixes T6119. This is a little fuzzy, but generally bumping up `innodb_buffer_pool_size` to something bigger than the default (which is often anemic, at `8M`) is desriable, and it seems like it will fix the specific issue a user encountered in T6119.
Test Plan: {F211855}
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T6119
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10630
Summary:
Ref T1191. Although I fixed some of the mutations earlier (in D10598), I missed the column mutations under old versions of MySQL. In particular, this isn't valid:
- `ALTER TABLE ... MODIFY columnName VARCHAR(64) COLLATE binary`
Issue the permitted version of this instead, which is:
- `ALTER TABLE ... MODIFY columnName VARBINARY(64)`
Also fixed an issue where a clean schema had the wrong nullability for a column in the draft table. Force it to the expected nullability.
The other trick here is around the one column with a FULLTEXT index on it, which needs a little massaging.
Test Plan:
- Forced my local install to return `false` for utf8mb4 support.
- Did a clean adjust into `binary` columns.
- Poked around, added emoji to things.
- Reverted the fake check and did a clean adjust into `utf8mb4` columns.
- Emoji survived.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: fabe, epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T1191
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10627
Summary: thanks mailbox
Test Plan: unit tests
Reviewers: btrahan, chad
Reviewed By: chad
Subscribers: epriestley
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10629
Summary:
Ref T1191. After utf8mb4 conversion, these tests no longer pass because MySQL allows emoji and gclefs and such.
We could keep these tests running by keeping a `ut8f_bin` table around somewhere, but we have no other use cases for it and it does not seem worth the added complexity. All these BMP-only codepaths are on the way out.
Update the `%s` / `%B` test to make sure it's rejecting invalid byte sequences, which are still not permitted.
Test Plan: Tests now pass.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T1191
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10621
Summary:
Ref T1191. Now that the whole database is covered, we don't need to do as much work to build expected schemata. Doing them database-by-database was helpful in converting, but is just reudndant work now.
Instead of requiring every application to build its Lisk objects, just build all Lisk objects.
I removed `harbormaster.lisk_counter` because it is unused.
It would be nice to autogenerate edge schemata, too, but that's a little trickier.
Test Plan: Database setup issues are all green.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley, hach-que
Maniphest Tasks: T1191
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10620
Summary: Ref T1191. The index's case sensitivity depends on the column type. Using `text` makes the search case-sensitive, which is not desirable.
Test Plan: After adjustment, searched for "PROJECTS" and found hits against "projects".
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T1191
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10619
Summary: Fixes T6211. This gives Herald rules an explicit execution order, which seems generally good. See some discussion on T6211 and inline.
Test Plan:
- Added unit test.
- Dry ran rules and saw rules appear in the expected order in the transcript.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T6211
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10624
Summary: Fixes T6210. The current messaging may be confusing if `pygmentize` is available but broken.
Test Plan: Faked the binary names and hit the errors, which seemed helpful.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T6210
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10626
Summary: Ref T6201. This isn't quite perfect but should be good enough. At some point far in the future I plan to revamp feed rendering a bit. This should possibly become a real ApplicationTransaction story eventually, too.
Test Plan: {F211777}
Reviewers: btrahan, chad
Reviewed By: chad
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T6201
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10625
Summary:
Ref T6223. Two issues:
- We don't use `/u` mode on these regexps. Without `/u`, the `\w`/`\W`/`\s`/`\S` modifiers have bad behavior on non-ASCII bytes. Add the flag to use unicode mode, making `\w` and `\s` behave like we expect.
- We might possibly want to do something different here eventually (for example, if the `/u` flag has some huge performance penalty) but this seems OK for now.
- We use `\b` (word boundary) to terminate the match, but `🐳` is not a word character. Use `(?!\w)` instead ("don't match before a word character") which is what we mean.
Test Plan: {F211498}
Reviewers: btrahan, chad
Reviewed By: chad
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T6223
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10618
Summary: Ref T1191. The bulk of the slowness in T1191 is copying tables. In some cases, we can't avoid this, but we have various readthrough caches which may be very large and are safe to drop, and dropping them is very quick (much less than 1 second). In particular, dropping the `changeset_parse_cache` made the process at least ~8 minutes faster on `secure.phabricator.com` (I killed it after 8 minutes, so I'm not sure what the real number is).
Test Plan: Ran `bin/storage adjust` and saw it drop caches before applying adjustments.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T1191
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10616
Summary: Ref T1191. Similar issue to D10613. This column usually has a hash exactly 12 bytes long, but sometimes stores an internal builtin query name like "open", "all", etc. It might be nice to promote those to 12-byte hashes of a consistent length eventually, but for now just make this a variable-length column.
Test Plan: Ran migration, no longer saw issues with reordering builtin saved searches.
Reviewers: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T1191
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10614
Summary:
Ref T1191. The `bytes` types are BINARY(...), which is fixed-length and zero-pads. These hashes are not 64 characters long, so migrating them to `binary` ends up with a bunch of zero-padding.
Instead, migrate them to `text` so we drop the zero padding. It would be vaguely nice to either introduce a `varbytes` type (ick) or change the hash size to a standard size (nicer) eventually, but this isn't very important.
Test Plan: Will adjust `secure.phabricator.com`.
Reviewers: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T1191
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10613
Summary: Ref T1191. I renamed the phases but missed these two since I didn't have any more key issues locally.
Test Plan: Ran `bin/storage adjust` in production with key issues.
Reviewers: btrahan
Subscribers: chad, epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T1191
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10612
Summary:
Ref T1191. When changing the column type of an AUTO_INCREMENT column, we currently may lose the autoincrement attribute.
Instead, support it. This is a bit messy because AUTO_INCREMENT columns interact with PRIMARY KEY columns (tables may only have one AUTO_INCREMENT column, and it must be a primary key). We need to migrate in more phases to avoid this issue.
Introduce new `auto` and `auto64` types to represent autoincrement IDs.
Test Plan:
- Saw autoincrement show up correctly in web UI.
- Fixed an autoincrement issue on the XHProf storage table with `bin/storage adjust` safely.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T1191
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10607
Summary:
Ref T1191. Currently, the `quickstart.sql` gets generated in a pretty manual fashion. This is a pain, and will become more of a pain in the world of utf8mb4.
Provide a workflow which does upgrade + adjust + dump + destroy, then massages the output to produce a workable `quickstart.sql`.
Test Plan: Inspected output; I'll test this more throughly before actually generating a new quickstart, but that's some ways away.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T1191
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10603
Summary:
Ref T1191. For most text columns, we either don't care if "a" and "A" are the same, or we expect them to be different (for example: keys, domains, secrets, etc). Default text columns to the `_bin` collation so they are compared by strict character value. This is safer in cases where we aren't sure.
For some text columns, we allow the user to sort by the column in the UI (like Maniphest task titles) or we do care that "A" and "a" are the same (for example: project names). Introduce a new class of virtual data types, the "sort..." types, to cover these columns. These are like the "text..." types but use sorting collations which treat "A" and "a" the same.
Test Plan:
- Made an effort to identify all columns where the UI relies on database collation.
- Ran `bin/storage adjust` and cleared all warnings.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: beng, epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T1191
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10602
Summary:
Ref T1191. These are a bit tricky because keys can interact with column changes, so basically we do three phases:
1. Nuke all bad keys.
2. Make all column (and database/table) changes.
3. Fix all nuked keys.
Test Plan: Ran migration locally. See note for remaining issues.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T1191
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10599
Summary:
Ref T1191. Adds a new workflow which can apply schema adjustments.
For now, it only performs database and table collation/charset adjustments. I believe these are extremely safe/minor, because they only affect the default values for newly created columns.
Test Plan:
- Ran migration on various database states, database/table changes went through cleanly.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T1191
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10595
Summary:
Ref T1191. This was useful for annotating everything but we no longer need it; there are just two types of issues now:
- Error: stuff we can't fix (missing or surplus tables/database/columns, bad column nullability).
- Warning: stuff we can fix (column types, character sets, collations, missing or surplus keys, incorrectly defined keys, bad key uniqueness).
Test Plan: Saw 3,399 warnings and 0 errors.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T1191
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10594
Summary:
Ref T1191. Ref T6203. While generating expected schemata, I ran into these columns which seem to have sketchy nullability.
- Mark most of them for later resolution (T6203). They work fine today and don't need to block T1191. Changing them can break the application, so we can't autofix them.
- Forgive a couple of them that are sort-of reasonable or going to get wiped out.
Test Plan: Saw 94 remaining warnings.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: hach-que, epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T1191, T6203
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10593
Summary:
Ref T1191. We have several keys on `<x, y, id>`. When `id` is an auto-increment primary key, I believe this is exactly equivalent to a key on `<x, y>`, because the leaf nodes are implicitly sorted by `id`. We omit the implicit `id` elsewhere.
It would be nice to drop the `id` bit for consistency, but it's not doing any harm and this doesn't need to block the primary work of T1191.
Test Plan: Saw slightly fewer warnings.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T1191
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10592
Summary:
Ref T1191. This destroys surplus columns:
- Pholio's transaction comments have a `mockID` column, but this is not used. The `imageID` column is used instead.
- Phragment has an unused `description` column.
- Releeph has an unused `summary` column.
Test Plan:
- Grepped for usage of these columns.
- Checked that these exist in production, too.
- Ran upgrades.
- Added Pholio inline comments.
- Saw fewer warnings.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley, hach-que
Maniphest Tasks: T1191
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10591
Summary:
Ref T1191.
- Adds definitions for missing keys and keys with wrong uniqueness. Generally, I defined these before fixing the key query to actually pull all keys and support uniqueness.
- Moves "key uniqueness" to note severity; this is fixable (probably?) and there are no remaining issues.
- Moves "Missing Key" to note severity; missing keys are fixable and all remaining missing keys are really missing (either missing edge keys, or missing PHID keys):
{F210089}
- Moves "Surplus Key" to note seveirty; surplus keys are fixable all remaining surplus keys are really surplus (duplicate key in Harbormaster, key on unused column in Worker):
{F210090}
Test Plan:
- Vetted missing/surplus/unique messages.
- 146 issues remaining.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T1191
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10590
Summary:
Ref T1191. Notable:
- Drops a very old saved query table. See comments inline: plan was to remove it after a year. It's been ~a year and two weeks.
- This has our only fulltext index. I'm not supporting that formally for now, but left a note.
- This has our only MyISAM table. I'm not supporting that explicitly for now, but it shouldn't affect anything. I may deal with this in the future.
- These tables don't actually write directly via Lisk, so there's some fiddling to get the schemata right.
Test Plan: Down to ~250 warnings. No more surplus databases or tables.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T1191
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10589
Summary:
Ref T1191. Notable:
- `HeraldApplyTranscript` is not actually a DAO and has no table (it is serialized into HeraldTranscript).
Test Plan: Down to fewer than 300 issues.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T1191
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10588
Summary:
Ref T1191. Nothing too notable here:
- Allow a Lisk object to specify that there's no expectation that a table exists. We have one Harbormaster object and one Token object like this.
- Removed BuildPlanTransactionComment because it's currently unused.
Test Plan:
- Saw ~200 fewer warnings; just ~800 left.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T1191
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10583
Summary:
Ref T1191.
- Removes ponder comment table. This was migrated a very long time ago.
Test Plan:
- Grepped for removed table.
- Saw ~100 fewer issues in web UI.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T1191
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10582
Summary:
Ref T1191. Notes:
- Drops the project affiliation table. This is a very old membership table which was migrated to edges.
- Drops the subproject table. This is a very old table for a removed feature.
Test Plan:
- Grepped for dropped tables.
- Saw ~100 fewer setup issues.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T1191
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10581
Summary:
Ref T1191. Some notes here:
- Drops the old LDAP and OAuth info tables. These were migrated to the ExternalAccount table a very long time ago.
- Separates surplus/missing keys from other types of surplus/missing things. In the long run, my plan is to have only two notice levels:
- Error: something we can't fix (missing database, table, or column; overlong key).
- Warning: something we can fix (surplus anything, missing key, bad column type, bad key columns, bad uniqueness, bad collation or charset).
- For now, retaining three levels is helpful in generating all the expected scheamta.
Test Plan:
- Saw ~200 issues resolve, leaving ~1,300.
- Grepped for removed tables.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T1191
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10580
Summary: Fixes T6201. This stuff didn't fully get updated for ApplicationTransactions. Get it working again (notably, make inline comment text publish) and clean it up a little bit.
Test Plan:
- Published a Differential feed story into Asana with comment text.
- Pulbished a Diffusion feed story into Asana with comment text.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T6201
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10584
Summary: Ref T1191. This actually works without T1191, but makes emoji use on the desktop easier.
Test Plan: {F210416}
Reviewers: chad, btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T1191
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10605
Summary: See <https://github.com/phacility/phabricator/issues/665>. From reading documentation, this seems dramatically better for InnoDB tables than the default behavior.
Test Plan: Ran `bin/storage dump`, got a reasonable-looking dump.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10606
Summary:
Ref T1191.
- This drops two tables.
- Both tables were migrated to transactions a very long time ago and no longer have readers or writers.
Test Plan: Saw ~150 fewer warnings.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T1191
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10576
Summary: Fixes T6184. On a Revision page we don't show the date as an important piece of information, so it's also not likely useful on a Hovercard (and confusing as to what the date means).
Test Plan: Hover over a linked Diff
Reviewers: btrahan, epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: epriestley, Korvin
Maniphest Tasks: T6184
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10579
Summary:
An explicit navigation markup was recenty added. Use it in
the userguide instead of ad-hoc -> or `->` chains.
Test Plan: Read the docs.
Reviewers: #blessed_reviewers, epriestley
Reviewed By: #blessed_reviewers, epriestley
Subscribers: epriestley
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10560
Conflicts:
src/docs/user/userguide/diffusion_hosting.diviner
Summary: Fixes T6199, checks if Calendar is installed and displays if so.
Test Plan: Turned Calendar on and off, tested both layouts.
Reviewers: btrahan, epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: epriestley, Korvin
Maniphest Tasks: T6199
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10574
Summary: Fixes T6189. We currently don't raise these to the editor level, so files, mentions, and project stuff get ignored.
Test Plan: Verified that files added to question and answer bodies end up attached to the relevant objects.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T6189
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10564
Summary: Ref T6185. Although it seems that we can't easily defuse or mitigate this, we can at least warn administrators.
Test Plan: Ran on my (unpatched, local) system, got a setup warning.
Reviewers: btrahan, chad
Reviewed By: chad
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T6185
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10561
Summary: Take my secrets on the road
Test Plan: View Passphrase on mobile device, see action list.
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: epriestley, Korvin
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10562
Summary:
Ref T2015. This increases the Drydock worker lease time to 24 hours. We noticed that some leases took longer than 2 hours when leasing from AWS (the actual resource was successfully leased at around 2 hours, 19 minutes).
24 hours should be plenty enough time to actually lease anything from EC2 (or any other leases during builds).
Test Plan: Have not yet tested this.
Reviewers: #blessed_reviewers, epriestley
Reviewed By: #blessed_reviewers, epriestley
Subscribers: epriestley, Korvin
Maniphest Tasks: T2015
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10544
Summary: This fixes a unit test failure that started occurring due to the new membership locking feature.
Test Plan: Ran the unit tests.
Reviewers: btrahan, epriestley, #blessed_reviewers
Reviewed By: epriestley, #blessed_reviewers
Subscribers: epriestley, Korvin
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10546
Summary: Ref T1191. Handful of minor things here (T6150, T6149, T6148, T6147, T6146) but nothing very noteworthy.
Test Plan: Viewed web UI, saw fewer errors.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T1191
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10527
Summary: Fixes T6177. Now that we've reframed "Beta" into "Prototype", there's no reason this needs to be in a separate super-hidden class of application anymore.
Test Plan: Saw Releeph available as a normal Prototype application.
Reviewers: btrahan, chad
Reviewed By: chad
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T6177
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10550
Summary: Fixes T6176. Language here is a bit awkard but I wanted to use the verb "removed" *and* still have the object first, so I ended up adding the before details parenthetically.
Test Plan: story no longer fatal'd in my feed
Reviewers: epriestley, chad
Reviewed By: chad
Subscribers: epriestley, Korvin
Maniphest Tasks: T6176
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10549
Summary: Fixes T6169 by using the new nav element on the existing troubleshooting hint the user missed. Fixes T6173 by implementing the user's suggestion.
Test Plan: Looked at docs and they looked good.
Reviewers: epriestley, chad
Reviewed By: chad
Subscribers: fas, epriestley, Korvin
Maniphest Tasks: T6169, T6173
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10548
Summary: Fixes T5374. Add an acceptance test to the `PhabricatorInfrastructureTestCase` class which fails if a Celerity map is not up-to-date. In order to achieve this, a lot of code used to generate Celerity maps was transferred from `CelerityManagementMapWorkflow` to `CelerityResourceMap` and `CelerityResourceMapGenerator`.
Test Plan: Ran `arc unit` and noticed that all tests passed. Modified a JavaScript file and ran `arc unit` again (without running `./bin/celerity map`)... this time the test failed, as expected.
Reviewers: epriestley, #blessed_reviewers
Reviewed By: epriestley, #blessed_reviewers
Subscribers: epriestley, Korvin
Maniphest Tasks: T5374
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D9817
Summary:
Ref T1191.
- Adds support for custom fields.
- Adds support for partial indexes (indexes on a prefix of a column).
- Drops old auxiliary storage table: this was moved to custom field storage about a year ago.
- Drops old project table: this was moved to edges about two months ago.
Test Plan:
- Viewed web UI, saw fewer issues.
- Used `grep` to verify no readers/writers for storage or project table.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T1191
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10526
Summary:
Ref T1191. Three parts:
- The old way of getting key information only got primary / unique / foreign keys, not all keys. Use `SHOW INDEXES` to get all keys instead.
- Track key uniqueness and raise warnings about it.
- Add a new "all issues" view to show an expanded, flat view of all issues. This is just an easier way to get a list so you don't have to dig around in the hierarchical view.
Test Plan:
{F206351}
{F206352}
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T1191
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10525
Summary:
Ref T1191.
- There was a varchar(50) column. I changed it to `text64`, since this length is unusual.
- There was an int(3) column. I changed it to `int32`, since this length is unusual.
Test Plan: Ran migrations, saw warnings disappear from config tool.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T1191
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10524
Summary: Ref T1191. This was migrated to transactions a very long time ago.
Test Plan: Ran migration, grepped, left comments in Slowvote.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T1191
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10523
Summary: T1191. Nothing very notable here.
Test Plan: Saw more blue in web UI.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10522
Summary: Ref T1191. Nothing too exciting in these.
Test Plan: Saw more blue in UI.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T1191
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10521
Summary:
Ref T1191. Notable:
- Allowed objects to remove default columns (some feed tables have no `id`).
- Added a "note" severity and moved all the charset stuff down to that to make progress more clear.
Test Plan:
Trying to make the whole thing blue...
{F205970}
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T1191
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10519
Summary: Ref T1191. Fills in some more of the databases. Nothing very notable here. I didn't encounter any issues or overlong keys.
Test Plan: Used web UI to click around and verify expected schemata match up against actual schemata well.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T1191
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10516
Summary:
Fixes T5603. Puts the toggling of locking membership into the editor so we get exceptions and all that.
I think the dialogue when you try to leave a project that is locked could be a little better maybe? Right now it just says "You can't leave" and "The membership is locked" more or less; should I surface a link to the policy stuff there too?
Test Plan:
- made a project, toggled the "lock" setting, observed stickiness and good transactions being made
- locked a project and tried to leave as a non-editor - got a dialogue letting me know i couldn't
- locked a project and tried to leave as an editor - left successfully
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: epriestley, Korvin
Maniphest Tasks: T5603
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10508
Summary: Ref T1191. This fills in some more features and gets audit and auth nearly generating reasonable expected schemata.
Test Plan: See screenshots.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T1191
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10500
Summary:
Ref T1191. The major issue motivation here is that InnoDB keys have a maximum length of 767 bytes. When we move `utf8` colums to `utf8mb4` columns, they'll jump from 3 bytes per character to 4 bytes per character, which may make some indexes too long. Add key schema to help spot this.
Also add nullability since it doesn't hurt.
Test Plan: See screenshots.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T1191
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10499
Summary:
Ref T1191. This lays some groundwork for generating the expected schemata, so we can compare them to the actual schemata and produce a meaningful diff.
- In general, each application will subclass `PhabricatorConfigSchemaSpec` and provide a definition of the tables it expects.
- This class has helper methods to mostly-automatically build table definitions for Lisk and (in the future) edges.
- When building expected schema, we specify a "data type", like "epoch". This is the type of data the application stores in the column, from the application's point of view. The SchemaSpec converts this into the best avilable storage type: for example, "text" will translate to `utf8mb4` if it's availalbe, or `binary` if not. This gives us a layer of indirection to insulate us from craziness.
Test Plan: See screenshots.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T1191
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10497
Summary:
Ref T1191. This builds on the "view of the database as it exists" by building a view of the database as it is expected to exist (this is mostly empty for now) and comparing the two. We now render a view of the "comparison schema", which is the actual schema merged with the expected schema and annotated with the differences.
(I'm merging them like this because it makes it easier to handle both "missing" and "surpulus" warnings in a consistent way. If we tried to annotate just the actual or expected schema, the absence of components which are expected to exist is messy to handle.)
Test Plan: See screenshots.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T1191
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10496
Summary:
Ref T1191. Plan here is:
- Build a tool showing the current schemata status (this diff).
- Have it compare the current status to the desired status (partly here, mostly in future diffs).
- Then add a migration tool, and eventually a setup issue to tell people to run it.
Test Plan:
Reviewed current schemata.
{F204492}
{F204493}
{F204494}
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T1191
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10494
Summary: See rP8806fb0296c2.
Test Plan:
me fail english
with bonus!
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10514
Summary:
Fixes T6084. Changes:
- Rename `phabricator.show-beta-applications` to `phabricator.show-prototypes`, to reinforce that these include early-development applications.
- Migrate the config setting.
- Add an explicit "no support" banner to the config page.
- Rename "Beta" to "Prototype" in the UI.
- Use "bomb" icon instead of "half star" icon.
- Document prototype applications in more detail.
- Explicitly document that we do not support these applications.
Test Plan:
- Ran migration.
- Resolved "obsolete config" issue.
- Viewed config setting.
- Browsed prototypes in Applications app.
- Viewed documentation.
Reviewers: chad, btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley, hach-que
Maniphest Tasks: T6084
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10493
Summary: ...also re-jiggers all the anchor stuff to use $xaction ID. This seemed like the simplest way once I got in the code, as well as having nice properties for if / when we want to re-add some ajax stuff since the ID is a pretty solid piece of data to key off. Fixes T6083.
Test Plan: mentioned DX in private DX+1. Could see on DX the mention as me and not as the other user. For transactions, I left a comment on Paste and it worked, and I edited an existing transaction and it worked.
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: epriestley, Korvin
Maniphest Tasks: T6083
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10488
Summary: Fixes T5536. Some bonus pht in there.
Test Plan: made a diff hovered over the stars and saw my new text.
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: epriestley, Korvin
Maniphest Tasks: T5536
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10487
Summary:
Implements a new transaction - still TYPE_ACTION - but using a new DifferentialAction::ACTION_COMMIT_CLOSE. Augment rendering as necessary to display this new transaction. Saves enough information so T3686 is possible but stops short of implementing a popup to display this information. Fixes T5875. Ref T3686.
One small display oddity - this new transaction now renders at the top of the transaction group whereas when it was a comment it was on the bottom. I think this is basically okay but if not how fix? (Playing with the "strength" of these actions will mess up the email too?)
Test Plan: made a diff X that fixed task Y. committed. checked diff X, task Y, and the commit pages for proper transactions and all looked good.
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: epriestley, Korvin
Maniphest Tasks: T3686, T5875
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10485
