1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://we.phorge.it/source/phorge.git synced 2024-09-20 01:08:50 +02:00
Commit graph

13 commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
epriestley
a4cc1373d3 Use a tokenizer, not a gigantic poorly-ordered "<select />", to choose repositories in Owners
Summary: Depends on D19190. Fixes T12590. Ref T13099. Replaces the barely-usable, gigantic, poorly ordered "<select />" control with a tokenizer. Attempts to fix various minor issues.

Test Plan:
  - Edited paths: include/exclude paths, from different repositories, different actual paths.
  - Used "Add New Path" to add rows, got repository selector prepopulated with last value.
  - Used "remove".
  - Used validation typeahead, got reasonable behaviors?

The error behavior if you delete the repository for a path is a little sketchy still, but roughly okay.

Maniphest Tasks: T13099, T12590

Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D19191
2018-03-07 20:57:24 -08:00
epriestley
c9df8f77c8 Fix transcription of single-value bulk edit fields ("Assign to")
Summary: See PHI333. Some of the cleanup at the tail end of the bulk edit changes made "Assign To" stop working properly, since we don't strip the `array(...)` off the `array(PHID)` value we receive.

Test Plan:
  - Used bulk editor to assign and unassign tasks (single value datasource).
  - Used bulk editor to change projects (multi-value datasource).

Reviewers: amckinley

Reviewed By: amckinley

Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D18975
2018-01-31 10:56:16 -08:00
epriestley
687fada5af Restore bulk edit support for remarkup fields (description, add comment)
Summary:
Depends on D18866. Ref T13025. Fixes T12415. This makes the old "Add Comment" action work, and adds support for a new "Set description to" action (possibly, I could imagine "append description" being useful some day, maybe).

The implementation is just a `<textarea />`, not a whole fancy remarkup box with `[Bold] [Italic] ...` buttons, preview, typeaheads, etc. It would be nice to enrich this eventually but doing the rendering in pure JS is currently very involved.

This requires a little bit of gymnastics to get the transaction populated properly, and adds some extra validation since we need some code there anyway.

Test Plan:
  - Changed the description of a task via bulk editor.
  - Added a comment to a task via bulk editor.

Reviewers: amckinley

Reviewed By: amckinley

Maniphest Tasks: T13025, T12415

Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D18867
2018-01-19 12:45:34 -08:00
epriestley
09e71a4082 Define bulk edits in terms of EditEngine, not hard-coded ad-hoc definitions
Summary:
Depends on D18862. See PHI173. Ref T13025. Fixes T10005. This redefines bulk edits in terms of EditEngine fields, rather than hard-coding the whole thing.

Only text fields -- and, specifically, only the "Title" field -- are supported after this change. Followup changes will add more bulk edit parameter types and broader field support.

However, the title field now works without any Maniphest-specific code, outside of the small amount of binding code in the `ManiphestBulkEditor` subclass.

Test Plan: Used the bulk edit workflow to change the titles of tasks.

Reviewers: amckinley

Reviewed By: amckinley

Maniphest Tasks: T13025, T10005

Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D18863
2018-01-19 12:43:47 -08:00
epriestley
fab37aa4e3 When accepting revisions, allow users to accept on behalf of a subset of reviewers
Summary:
Ref T12271. Currenty, when you "Accept" a revision, you always accept it for all reviewers you have authority over.

There are some situations where communication can be more clear if users can accept as only themselves, or for only some packages, etc. T12271 discusses some of these use cases in more depth.

Instead of making "Accept" a blanket action, default it to doing what it does now but let the user uncheck reviewers.

In cases where project/package reviewers aren't in use, this doesn't change anything.

For now, "reject" still acts the old way (reject everything). We could make that use checkboxes too, but I'm not sure there's as much of a use case for it, and I generally want users who are blocking stuff to have more direct accountability in a product sense.

Test Plan:
  - Accepted normally.
  - Accepted a subset.
  - Tried to accept none.
  - Tried to accept bogus reviewers.
  - Accepted with myself not a reviewer
  - Accepted with only one reviewer (just got normal "this will be accepted" text).

{F4251255}

Reviewers: chad

Reviewed By: chad

Maniphest Tasks: T12271

Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D17533
2017-03-22 14:25:04 -07:00
epriestley
3c5a17ba8a Restore "Reclaim" and "Abandon" actions to Differential on EditEngine
Summary: Ref T11114. This begins restoring comment actions to Differential, but on top of EditEngine.

Test Plan: {F2263148}

Reviewers: chad

Reviewed By: chad

Maniphest Tasks: T11114

Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D17107
2016-12-31 10:06:46 -08:00
Chad Little
d78802f3ab Redesign Comment Box
Summary: Redesign the action comment box for better use in two column, mobile, nuance.

Test Plan: Test in mobile / desktop / tablet, adding and removing actions. Actionless comment boxes, etc.

Reviewers: epriestley

Reviewed By: epriestley

Subscribers: cspeckmim, Korvin

Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D16811
2016-11-09 10:36:25 -08:00
epriestley
67629aab14 Implement a rough optgroup-based "Move on Workboard" stacked action
Summary:
Ref T6027. Try this out and see how it feels? Clear issues:

  - This definitely shouldn't be at the top.
  - You should probably be able to select it multiple times?
  - Some of the "which columns show up" rules might need adjustment?
  - Diamond marker maybe not great?

Not sure I love this but it doesn't feel //terrible//...

Test Plan: {F1207891}

Reviewers: chad

Reviewed By: chad

Maniphest Tasks: T6027

Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15638
2016-04-06 09:15:12 -07:00
epriestley
f84130f9cd Support enabling a formal points field in Maniphest
Summary:
Ref T4427.

  - New config option for labels, enabling, etc., but no UI/niceness yet.
  - When enabled, add a field.
  - Allow nonnegative values, including fractional values.
  - EditEngine is nice and Conduit / actions basically just work with a tiny bit of extra support code.

Test Plan:
  - Edited points via "Edit".
  - Edited points via Conduit.
  - Edited points via stacked actions.
  - Tried to set "zebra" points.
  - Tried to set -1 points.

Reviewers: chad

Reviewed By: chad

Maniphest Tasks: T4427

Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15220
2016-02-08 18:14:44 -08:00
epriestley
273e22d59f Save stacked actions in drafts, not just comments
Summary:
Ref T9132. Fixes T4580. Thhat might actually have been fixed a while ago or something since it describes a buggy/bad interaction which doesn't reproduce for me at HEAD.

This saves and restores all the stacked actions (subscribers, projects, etc) so that you don't lose anything if you close a window by accident.

Test Plan:
Added a bunch of actions in various states, reloaded the page, draft stuck around.

Submitted form, actions didn't stick around anymore.

Reviewers: chad

Reviewed By: chad

Maniphest Tasks: T4580, T9132

Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D14675
2015-12-04 16:29:43 -08:00
epriestley
f9e84d1a88 Make "Assign / Claim" stacked action work properly in Maniphest
Summary:
Ref T9132. This is kind of a mess because the tokenizer rewrite left rendering tokenizers in Javascript a little rough. This causes bugs like icons not showing up on tokens in the "Policy" dialog, which there's a task for somewhere I think.

I think I've fixed it enough that the beahavior is now correct (i.e., icons show up properly), but some of the code is a bit iffy. I'll eventually clean this up properly, but it's fairly well contained for now.

Test Plan:
  - Reassigned a task.
  - Put a task up for grabs.
  - No reassign on closed tasks.

Reviewers: chad

Reviewed By: chad

Maniphest Tasks: T9132

Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D14669
2015-12-04 16:29:35 -08:00
epriestley
92ea07e787 Restore "Change Status" and "Change Priority" comment actions to Maniphest
Summary: Ref T9132. Supports selects in stacked actions and adds "Change Status" + "Change Priority".

Test Plan: Changed status and priority from stacked actions.

Reviewers: chad

Reviewed By: chad

Maniphest Tasks: T9132

Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D14667
2015-12-04 16:29:33 -08:00
epriestley
dc0d914134 Basic stacked action support for EditEngine
Summary: Ref T9132. This still has a lot of rough edges but the basics seem to work OK.

Test Plan: {F1012627}

Reviewers: chad

Reviewed By: chad

Maniphest Tasks: T9132

Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D14653
2015-12-03 12:32:02 -08:00