Summary: Ref T3663. There's no data recorded in this table yet, but add the UI and controller for it. Edits and such will eventually go here.
Test Plan: Clicked "View History" on a project, got an empty but non-broken page.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T3663
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6785
Summary:
Ref T3663. This is a proto-transaction record which is obsoleted by real transactions. It has no UI, so I'm not bothering to retain/migrate the data since there's no regression.
Just get rid of it and all its writers. I'm keeping the table for now in case something crazy uses this somehow, so no data is actually destroyed.
Test Plan: `grep`
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T3663
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6784
Summary: This has two use sites and no special logic.
Test Plan: `grep`
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6783
Summary: Ref T3718. Releeph has a custom implementation of this exception; a more general version exists in CustomField. Use the more general one. Nothing catches the specific one.
Test Plan: `grep`
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T3718
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6782
Summary: Ref T3092. This was obsoleted recently and has no more call/use sites.
Test Plan: `grep`
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T3092
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6779
Summary: Ref T3663. Does what it says on the tin.
Test Plan: Ran `storage upgrade`.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T3663
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6778
Summary: Ref T3663. This is obsolete code which is used only in this migration, which Facebook has already performed and which isn't relevant for any other installs.
Test Plan: `grep`
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T3663
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6777
Summary: Ref T3092. Same deal as D6771, but for branches rather than projects.
Test Plan: {F54855}
Reviewers: btrahan, chad
Reviewed By: chad
CC: chad, aran
Maniphest Tasks: T3092
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6775
Summary:
Ref T3092.
Releeph's objects basically go like this:
- At the top level, we have Projects (like "www" or "libphutil")
- Each project has Branches (like "LATEST" or "v1.1.3")
- Each branch has Requests (like pull requests, e.g. "please merge commit X into branch Y (in project Z)")
Currently, there's no real "project detail" or "branch detail" page. Instead, we have a search results page for their contained objects. That is, the "project detail" page shows a list of branches in the project, using ApplicationSearch.
This means that operations like "edit" and "deactivate" are one level up, on the respective list pages.
Instead, move details onto the detail pages. This gives us more room for actions and information, and simplifies the list views.
Basically, these are "detail pages" where the object content is a search interface. We do something simliar to this in Phame right now, although it's messier there (no ApplicationSearch yet).
@chad, you might have some ideas here. Roughly, the design question is "How should we present an object's detail view when its content is really a search interface (Phame Blog for Posts, Releeph Project for Branches)?"
I think the simple approach I've taken here (see screenshot) gives us reasonable results, but overall it's something we haven't done much or done too much thinking about, I think.
Test Plan: {F54774}
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: chad, aran
Maniphest Tasks: T3092
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6771
Summary: Depends on D6769, removes 'dust' and uses a similar color background.
Test Plan: Review colors in sandbox.
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: Korvin, aran
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6772
Summary:
^\s+(['"])dust\1\s*=>\s*true,?\s*$\n
Test Plan: Looked through the diff.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
CC: aran
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6769
Summary: Fixes T2836
Test Plan: make a diff, get it approved, arc land, verify things okay. ask users on T2836 to try.
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: Korvin, aran
Maniphest Tasks: T2836
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6770
Summary:
This diff accomplishes this task by adding an arbitrary metadata store to PhabricatorObjectHandle. This seemed like it would be "necessary eventually"; for example if / when we decide we want to show images in these stories we'd need to add some more arbitrary data. A point of debate is this technique will yield the _current_ data and not the data at the time the transaction was originally made. I can see this being both desirable and non-desirable.
Otherwise, the best way to do this is to make a new transaction type specifically for create and store exactly what data we think we would need.
(and there's probably many other ways but they require much more work...)
Test Plan: viewed some pholio create stories and yes, they had the description showing.
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: Korvin, aran
Maniphest Tasks: T3685
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6767
Summary: Ref T2852. Asana is launching some kind of silent follow thing today; I don't know what the API is but it's probably something like this. I'll update this to actually make the right call once the call exists, this is mostly just a placeholder so I don't forget about it.
Test Plan: None yet, this API isn't documented or live and doesn't work yet so it can't be tested.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran, moskov
Maniphest Tasks: T2852
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6740
Summary: Ref T3092. Fixes T3724. Use modern/flexible UI for these interfaces. Removes the ability to retarget an existing branch (you can just close it and open a new one if you made a mistake).
Test Plan: {F54437} {F54438}
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T3092, T3724
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6765
Summary:
Releeph branch lists in project views have a bunch of custom UI right now; give them more standard UI and ApplicationSearch.
This drops a small piece of functionality: we now show only a total open request count instead of a detailed enumeration of each request status. I assume this is reasonable (that is, the important piece is "is there something to do on this branch?"), but we can muck with it if the more detailed status is important.
Test Plan: {F54344}
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: LegNeato, aran
Maniphest Tasks: T3656
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6764
Summary: Ref T2766. Does the integration via ApplicationTransactionsEditor. Only did addCC and Flag for proof of concept.
Test Plan: Made a rule to cc, made a rule to flag. They worked! (will attach screens to diff)
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: Korvin, aran
Maniphest Tasks: T2766
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6766
Summary: somewhere along the line this broke. Before this patch we fail the visibility check since its based on Conpherence Participants which don't get created and attached until applyExternalEffects. Believe it or not, this was the least gross fix I could come up with; since the permission check is done SO early most other ideas I had involved creating a dummy participant object to pass the check then handling things for real later on... Ref T3723.
Test Plan: created a conpherence with myself - great success
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: chad, Korvin, aran
Maniphest Tasks: T3723
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6762
Summary:
Ref T3721. Releeph currently attempts to implement a flexible, field-driven search for branches, but it's building all of its own infrastructure and it ends up heading down some weird paths. In particular, it loads **every** request and then makes calls into fields to filter them. It also tries to be very very general, which isn't really necessary (for example, I think it's reasonable for us to assume that we won't let you disable the "requestor" field).
ApplicationSearch and CustomField provide more scalable approaches to this problem; move search on top of them. The query still ends up doing some filtering in-process, but it's now far more limited in scope and can be denormalized later.
Test Plan: {F54304}
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: chad, aran
Maniphest Tasks: T3721
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6758
Summary:
Ref T3718. This moves custom field rendering on the edit screen to PhabricatorCustomField and makes all the APIs conformant.
We still run through edit with both old-school and new-school sets of fields, because the actual editing isn't on the new stuff yet. That will happen in a diff or two.
Test Plan: Edited a request; intentionally introduced errors and verified the form behaved as expected.
Reviewers: btrahan, testuser1122344
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T3718
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6756
Summary: Defaults hovercards off everywhere feed stories are shown. I tried to find where to put this in so /feed/ could display them, but got horribly lost and confused in SearchQueryLandView
Test Plan: turn hovercards on and off, inspect elements.
Reviewers: epriestley, btrahan
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: Korvin, aran
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6757
Summary: Ref T3718. This is not used and does not seem particularly useful.
Test Plan: Grep.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: LegNeato, aran
Maniphest Tasks: T3718
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6755
Summary: Currently, we check that the user can view and edit their own transaction, which is always true. Instead, check that they can view the object. I'll fix this with a more tailored check against the EDIT capability that's per-transaction later.
Test Plan: Applying no transactions no longer fatals with undefined `$xaction`.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6754
Summary:
Ref T1703. Ref T3718. This introduces `PhabricatorCustomFieldAttachment`, which is just a fancy `array()`. The goal here is to simplify `PhabricatorCustomFieldInterface` as much as possible.
In particular, it can now use common infrastructure (`assertAttached()`) and is more difficult to get wrong.
Test Plan: Edited custom fields on profile.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T1703, T3718
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6752
Summary:
Ref T1703. Ref T3718. The `PhabricatorCustomFieldList` seems like a pretty good idea. Move more code into it to make it harder to get wrong.
Also the sequencing on old/new values for these transactions was a bit off; fix that up.
Test Plan: Edited standard and custom profile fields.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T1703, T3718
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6751
Summary:
Fixes T3661. Ref T3718. This makes Releeph custom fields extend PhabricatorCustomField so we can start moving over other pieces of infrastructure (rendering, storage, etc) to run through the same pathways. It's roughly the minimum amount of work required to be able to move forward.
NOTE: This removes per-project custom field selectors. Fields are now configured for an entire install. My understanding is that Facebook does not use this feature, and modern field infrastructure has moved away from selectors.
Test Plan: Viewed and edited projects, branches, and requests in Releeph. Grepped for removed config. Grepped for `field_selector`.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: LegNeato, aran
Maniphest Tasks: T3661, T3718
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6750
Summary:
Ref T1702. Ref T3718. There are a couple of things going on here:
**PhabricatorCustomFieldList**: I added `PhabricatorCustomFieldList`, which is just a convenience class for dealing with lists of fields. Often, current field code does something like this inline in a Controller:
foreach ($fields as $field) {
// do some junk
}
Often, that junk has some slightly subtle implications. Move all of it to `$list->doSomeJunk()` methods (like `appendFieldsToForm()`, `loadFieldsFromStorage()`) to reduce code duplication and prevent errors. This additionally moves an existing list-convenience method there, out of `PhabricatorPropertyListView`.
**PhabricatorUserConfiguredCustomFieldStorage**: Adds `PhabricatorUserConfiguredCustomFieldStorage` for storing custom field data (like "ICQ Handle", "Phone Number", "Desk", "Favorite Flower", etc).
**Configuration-Driven Custom Fields**: Previously, I was thinking about doing these with interfaces, but as I thought about it more I started to dislike that approach. Instead, I built proxies into `PhabricatorCustomField`. Basically, this means that fields (like a custom, configuration-driven "Favorite Flower" field) can just use some other Field to actually provide their implementation (like a "standard" field which knows how to render text areas). The previous approach would have involed subclasssing the "standard" field and implementing an interface, but that would mean that every application would have at least two "base" fields and generally just seemed bleh as I worked through it.
The cost of this approach is that we need a bunch of `proxy` junk in the base class, but that's a one-time cost and I think it simplifies all the implementations and makes them a lot less magical (e.g., all of the custom fields now extend the right base field classes).
**Fixed Some Bugs**: Some of this code hadn't really been run yet and had minor bugs.
Test Plan:
{F54240}
{F54241}
{F54242}
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T1702, T1703, T3718
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6749
Summary: Ref T3656. Releeph denormalizes branch cut point identifiers into Branch objects, but this information isn't useful or used for sorting, filtering, or enforcing unique constraints. Instead, derive it via noramlized pathways from the `cutPointCommitPHID`.
Test Plan: Ran storage upgrade. Ran `releephwork.getbranch` and `releeph.getbranches`. Grepped for `cutPointCommitIdentifier`.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: LegNeato, aran
Maniphest Tasks: T3656
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6636
Summary:
Fixes T3660. Releeph Projects currently have an unused one-to-one mapping to Phabricator projects. This isn't consistent with other applications and has no integrations or uses. Get rid of it.
NOTE: Waiting for signoff from @legneato on T3660 before pulling the trigger here.
Test Plan: Created and edited Releeph projects. Grepped for references to project ID; there are a dozen or so but they're all either Releeph projects or Arcanist projects.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: LegNeato, aran
Maniphest Tasks: T3660
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6635
Summary: Ref T3655. Depends on D6633. This removes the writes and the column.
Test Plan: Created a project, edited a project. Verified the table doesn't have any keys including this column.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: LegNeato, aran
Maniphest Tasks: T3655
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6634
Summary:
Ref T3655. ReleephProject currently has both `repositoryID` and `repositoryPHID`, which point to the same object and are reudundant. Get rid of all reads of `repositoryID`.
NOTE: This makes project loads depend on repository loads. The eventual rule here will be that you must be able to see a repository in order to see projects for that repository, which seems like a reasonable rule. We might need to tailor it more than this (e.g., if there are branch read permissions down the line) but this seems like a reasonable minimum.
Test Plan: Grepped for `repositoryID` in `releeph/`. Called `releeph.getbranches`.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: LegNeato, aran
Maniphest Tasks: T3655
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6633
Summary:
Ref T1809. Provide ApplicationSearch to Flags and allow the user to select flags by color.
@chad might have some design feedback on my control.
Test Plan: {F54131}
Reviewers: btrahan, chad
Reviewed By: chad
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T1809
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6747
Summary:
Ref T1809. Ref T603. Ref T3599. Makes flags policy aware.
This change reduces the utility of flag search/browse; the next change will switch it to ApplicationSearch to restore utility. Representing all that ordering in terms of cursor paging is also a giant pain.
Test Plan: Viewed Differential, Flags, etc. Grepped for all PhabricatorFlagQuery callsites.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T603, T1809, T3599
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6746
Summary: Fixes T2258.
Test Plan: collapsed and expanded file via the dropdown - good stuff. got the "undo" element into the mix - also good stuff.
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: chad, Korvin, aran
Maniphest Tasks: T2258
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6742
Summary: Fixes T2348. We should probably do some of this more broadly, but can tackle them one at a time as they arise, since many fields have no effective length limit.
Test Plan: {F54126}
Reviewers: btrahan, asherkin
Reviewed By: asherkin
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T2348
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6744
Summary: See IRC. This is dumb but I think we should try to work by default on Debian, and it doesn't cost us too much. See inline comment for more.
Test Plan:
- No `disable_functions`, restarted, worked fine.
- Set `disable_functions = pcntl_derp`, restarted, worked fine.
- Set `disable_functions = derp`, restarted, setup fatal.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6741
Summary: Ref T2852. Bleh, gross. Does what it says in the title.
Test Plan: {F54024}
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T2852
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6735
Summary: Ref T2852. Token given stories currently try to `strip_tags()` a `PHUIFeedView` or similar, which doesn't work. Cast it to a string before stripping. This is super gross but I don't want to clean it up until after ApplicationTransactions so we can really clean up all of Feed.
Test Plan: Ran `bin/feed republish <id>` on a feed story about giving a token to a revision.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T2852
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6733
Summary: Fixes T3697. Currently, we don't pass "branch" implicitly, so, e.g., when viewing a branch you don't get the right commit hash when looking up the README.
Test Plan: Viewed a non-`master` branch with a README, no fatal. Poked around and couldn't find anything suspicious.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T3697
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6734
Summary:
Fixes T3709. PHP has two configuration options ('disable_functions', 'disable_classes') which allow functions and classes to be blacklisted at runtime.
Since these break things in an unclear way, raise a setup fatal if they are set.
We take a slightly more tailored approach to these in `phd` already, but I'd rather try just saying "no, this is bad" and see if we can get away with it. I suspect we can, and there's no legitimate reason to blacklist functions given that Phabricator must have access to, e.g., `proc_open()`.
Test Plan: {F54058}
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T3709
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6739
Summary: Fixes T3710. The text on these options is switched around.
Test Plan: {F54051} {F54052}
Reviewers: btrahan, nmalcolm, chad
Reviewed By: chad
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T3710
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6737
Summary:
companion diff to D6729. This is the back-end stuff, plus calls the JS in D6729 for when images are removed, un-removed, uploaded, or replaced.
Fixes T3640.
Test Plan: messed around with images. hit save - new order! temporarily showed these stories and got text about re-ordering stuff.
Reviewers: epriestley, chad
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: Korvin, aran
Maniphest Tasks: T3640
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6731
Summary:
Ref T3640. JS part only, should give you a list in `imageOrder` on the server that you can read with `$request->getStrList('imageOrder')`.
NOTE: You can't drag images into the first position; this is an existing thing that I just need to fix with DraggableList.
@chad might have some design feedback.
Test Plan: Dragged images around, things seemed to work?
Reviewers: btrahan, chad
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T3640
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6729
Summary: Ref T2852. Currently, we publish commits with no audit requests and reviews with no CCs or reviewers into Asana. This creates undesired notifications, so drop events which would publish an object that doesn't exist yet and has no followers or respible users.
Test Plan: Used `bin/feed republish` to publish a story about an object with no related users, saw the publish abort with the new message. Added a CC, published again, got a publish.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T2852
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6727
Summary:
We currently check if daemons are running using the filesystem and process list. These checks reach the wrong result for a lot of users because their webservers can't read the filesystem or process list. They also reach the wrong result for daemons running on other machines.
Instead, query the active daemon list to see if daemons are running. This should be significantly more reliable.
(We didn't do this before because the running daemon list mechanism didn't exist when the check was written, and at the time it was more complex than doing a simple filesystem/process list thing.)
Test Plan: Viewed `/repositories/` with and without daemons running, saw appropriate warning or lack of warning.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6722
Summary: Fixes T3703. Clear question notifications when viewing a question.
Test Plan: Gave a question a token, logged in as author, saw notification, viewed question page, notification was marked read.
Reviewers: chad, btrahan
Reviewed By: chad
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T3703
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6723
Summary: This fixed a bug with macros search finding macros flagged by any user. We should only look at flags by the current user.
Test Plan: Verify that no macros flagged by another user show up in macros search.
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: Korvin, aran
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6717
Summary: Cleaning up my mess, (No Filtering) should be the default selected option in macros search form.
Test Plan: Go to /macro/query/advanced/ and verify that (No Filtering) is the default selected option.
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: Korvin, aran
Maniphest Tasks: T3692
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6715
Summary: I think we accidentally forgot to include this action in D6660.
Test Plan: verified it showed up in the UI to have the action be an audit
Reviewers: chad, epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: Korvin, aran
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6712
Summary: we get participation data ordered, then query conpherences by phid... be sure to resort the conpherences based on participation data. I missed this in testing 'cuz my test data is so trashy, but it is glaringly obvious in production. :/
Test Plan: replied to a very old conpherence and noted it was first in the notification panel
Reviewers: chad, epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: Korvin, aran
Maniphest Tasks: T3641
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6711
Summary: Reuse the existing flags functionality for searching macros. Currently implemented as a simple select element (for color).
Test Plan: Flagged some macros and tried searching by them.
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: aran, Korvin
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6709
Summary: Fixes T3641. Probably needs some @chad love though on colors and what have you. Technique was to jam this into the existing notifications stuff as much as possible. I think its "okay" but if we were to add more stuff here (like a 3rd application) this could get a quality pass to consolidate even more code.
Test Plan: played with it in Chrome and Safari - looks reasonable
Reviewers: chad, epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: aran, Korvin
Maniphest Tasks: T3641
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6708
Summary:
This is mostly for personal reasons / lols, but they have a perfectly functional OAuth2 API and it takes like 15 minutes to add a provider now and I was in this code anyway...
@chad, we could use JIRA, Twitter and Twitch.tv auth icons if you have a chance.
Test Plan: {F53564}
Reviewers: btrahan, chad
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6706
Summary: Ref T2852. Asana adds the actor as a follower when they create a task, so subtasks currently have up to two followers (the actor and the reviewer) when they should have only one (the reviewer). Simply removing the actor is an effective remedy for this because unfollowing tasks occurs with sneaky ninja stealth in Asana and doesn't generate notifications or even transaction activity.
Test Plan: Synchronized a revision without this patch, saw two followers on the subtask. Synchronized a revision after this patch, saw the "removeFollowers" fire and only one follower on the subtask, with no record of the removal in notifications or the transaction log.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T2852
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6700
Summary: Fixes a query in √D6260.
Test Plan: View a Releeph RQ and verify that the "churn" field renders and has the right numbers in it.
Reviewers: epriestley, btrahan
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: aran, Korvin
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6702
Summary: Ref T2769. This isn't a real adapter and its methods are increasingly hacky messes. Make "dry run" a first-class concept on the HeraldEngine instead and remove the adapter.
Test Plan: Ran Herald via test console and via CLI.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T2769
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6693
Summary:
Ref T2769. This will house the transaction list and replace the "edit log" stuff.
The UI is a little bit rough and can probably share more code with the transaction history, but seems mostly-reasonable.
Test Plan: {F53253}
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T2769
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6690
Summary: Ref T2769. The `HeraldRule` class has some query logic; move it into `HeraldRuleQuery`. Also some minor cleanup.
Test Plan: Ran test console, created a new revision, used `reparse.php --herald`. Verified rules triggered correctly.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T2769
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6689
Summary:
Ref T2769. Move all of this stuff into Adapters and get rid of the hard-coded classes.
I cheated in two places.
Test Plan: Edited and activated Herald rules.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran, chad
Maniphest Tasks: T2769
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6688
Summary: Ref T2769. Moves all traces of HeraldConditionConfig into Adapters.
Test Plan: Edited rules and used Test Console to exercise both affected code paths. Tried to save invalid rules to hit error pat.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T2769
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6679
Summary: Ref T2769. Get rid of the last use of `HeraldContentTypeConfig` by moving repetition options into Adapters.
Test Plan: Viewed / edited Herald rules.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T2769
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6664
Summary: Ref T2769. Use Adapters to build all the strings for transcripts, then get rid of the old maps.
Test Plan: Viewed revision and commit transcripts.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T2769
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6663
Summary: Ref T2769. This cleans up almost every use of the HeraldContentTypeConfig class.
Test Plan: Viewed and edited Herald rules.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T2769
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6662
Summary: Ref T2769. Shift the bulk of value and action config into Adapters.
Test Plan: Viewed and edited Herald list and rules.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran, vrana
Maniphest Tasks: T2769
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6660
Summary: Ref T2769. Herald has a giant hard-coded list of fields. Primarily make these dynamic and adapter-based.
Test Plan: Viewed and edited Herald rules.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T2769
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6657
Summary:
Ref T2769. Get content types out of hard-coded config and into dynamic adapters.
This removes the "MERGE" and "OWNERS" content types, which were vestigal. These needs are likely better addressed through subscriptions/transactions, and are obsolete, and haven't existed for 2+ years and no one has asked for them to be restored.
Test Plan: Mostly a bunch of grep. Viewed rule list, rule edit. Edited a revision.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T2769
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6656
Summary: Ref T2769. I'm planning to keep this pretty simple, but we have this ad-hoc edit log for rules already and some other mess that we can clean up.
Test Plan: No effect yet; see future changes.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T2769
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6654
Summary: Ref T2769. Ref T2625. Herald is currently a giant mishmash of hard-codes and weird special cases. Move toward modernization and normality.
Test Plan: {F52716}
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T2625, T2769
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6652
Summary:
Ref T603. Ref T2769. Herald currently interacts with policies in a bad way; specifically, I can create a rule which emails me for everything, and thus learn about objects I can't otherwise see.
This shouldn't be possible, so I'm going to reduce personal rules to have only the viewer's scope.
For global rules, I think I'm always going to let any user edit them, but make who the rule acts as part of the configuration. There will be an option to make a rule omnipotent, but only admins (or some other special subset of users) will be able to select it.
Transactions/subscriptions will provide a check against users editing global rules in ways that are bad.
Test Plan: Next diffs.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T603, T2769
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6649
Summary: Ref T3684 for discussion. This could be cleaned up a bit (it would be nice to draw entropy once per request, for instance, and maybe respect CSRF_TOKEN_LENGTH more closely) but should effectively mitigate BREACH.
Test Plan: Submitted forms; submitted forms after mucking with CSRF and observed CSRF error. Verified that source now has "B@..." tokens.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T3684
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6686
Summary:
Ref T2852. Two issues:
- Embeds (`T12`, `{T12}`) have some handle issues because handles run afoul of visibility checks under some configs. Make handles unconditionally visible.
- Asana links don't render correctly into text mode. Give them a valid text mode rendering so they don't flip out.
Test Plan: Made comments with `T12` and `http://app.asana.com/...` and published them to Asana.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T2852
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6696
Summary: Ref T2852. After some discussion, Asana doesn't want "close" stories either.
Test Plan: Used `bin/feed republish` to publish close and non-close stories from Differential and Diffusion. Verified comments were synchronized in the expected cases.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T2852
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6697
Summary: Tightens up the CSS to display more items (4 wide on 15") and fixes some mobile CSS issues with appseach. Fixes T3614
Test Plan: Tested Pholio, Macros, mobile layouts
Reviewers: epriestley, btrahan
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: aran, Korvin
Maniphest Tasks: T3614
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6694
Summary: We already show transaction and maniphest comments.
Test Plan: Review my feed, see diff comment.
Reviewers: epriestley, btrahan
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: aran, Korvin
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6687
Summary: This adds hovercards to most stories and removes the profile photo from one line stories. I don't know about my implementation, which has difficulties with application transactions (because it shows status). Which leads me to a bigger question, which is can we render all people through a common function like AphrontTagView so we can easily class and/or hovercard it anywhere.
Test Plan: Reviewed my feed, various stories.
Reviewers: epriestley, btrahan
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: aran, Korvin
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6684
Summary: Fixes T3680. One description was wrong, and clean up some of the other stuff.
Test Plan: Ran `phd`.
Reviewers: btrahan, Korvin
Reviewed By: Korvin
CC: aran, jifriedman, Korvin
Maniphest Tasks: T3680
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6683
Summary: Email replies and subscribers seem to go hand in hand so deploy both at once.
Test Plan: played around with bin/mail. Verified replies posted comments on the paste.
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: aran, Korvin
Maniphest Tasks: T3650
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6682
Summary: Ref T2625. This doesn't do anything fancy, but gives feed a little more flexibility.
Test Plan: Viewed `/feed/`.
Reviewers: btrahan, chad
Reviewed By: chad
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T2625
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6681
Summary: Ref T3671. Depends on D6674. Continues work in D6673, D6674 and extends it into Legalpad and Phriction. Then deletes a bunch of dead code.
Test Plan: Edited documents in Legalpad and Phriction, verified I got reasonable looking previews.
Reviewers: btrahan, Firehed
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran, chad
Maniphest Tasks: T3671
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6675
Summary:
Ref T3578. Ref T3671. Depends on D6673. Use `PHUIRemarkupPreviewPanel` (introduced in D6673) to provide question create/edit and answer edit previews in Ponder.
Then delete a million lines of duplicate code.
Test Plan: Edited a question; edited an answer. Saw live previews.
Reviewers: btrahan, Firehed
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T3578, T3671
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6674
Summary:
Ref T3671. A lot of applications have pretty ad-hoc preview code. Clean it up a bit and add Summary preview to Differential.
After ApplicationTransactions we might want to try to serialize the whole form and show a preview of all the transactions, but this seems not very useful in most cases (I'd guess that Remarkup previews are 99% of the value) and tricky to get right (e.g., adding images which don't exist yet to Pholio mocks).
I think I can add this in a few other places, too.
Test Plan:
Edited Maniphest Tasks and Differential Revisions, mashed some buttons. Verified previews rendered correctly. Grepped for removed CSS classes (no hits).
{F52907}
Reviewers: btrahan, Firehed
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran, chad
Maniphest Tasks: T3671
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6673
Summary: Fixes T3679. This comes up every so often and the old script is extremely broad (nuke everything in a repository). Provide a more surgical tool.
Test Plan: Ran a bunch of variations of the script and they all seemed to work OK.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran, staticshock
Maniphest Tasks: T3679
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6678
Summary: Fixes T3678. I think some very old rows may have a junk value here. This will be obsoleted by ApplicationTransactions and other modernization, most likely, so just fix it locally.
Test Plan: looked at a task
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T3678
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6677
Summary: This puts back the 'one line' story we previously had with the updated design.
Test Plan: Review my feed.
Reviewers: epriestley, btrahan
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: aran, Korvin
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6666
Summary:
Add the ability to select singular and multiple lines in paste to highlight.
This is related to T3627
Test Plan: Create a paste, select one or more lines.
Reviewers: epriestley, tberman
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: aran, chad
Maniphest Tasks: T3627
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6668
