Summary: Ref T6962. Mainly accomplished by re-factoring the base editor `buildMailBody` function and then using it differently in the `DifferentialTransactionEditor`.
Test Plan: commented on a revision leaving inline feedback. inspected via bin/mail and it looked good! also made a maniphest comment and checked that email, which still looked good.
Reviewers: chad, epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: Korvin, epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T6962
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D11402
Summary:
Ref T3165. Builds a dedicated index for Conpherence to avoid scale/policy filtering concerns.
- This is pretty one-off but I think it's generally OK.
- There's no UI for it.
- `ConpherenceFulltextQuery` is very low-level. You would need to do another query on the PHIDs it returns to actually show anything to the user.
- The `previousTransactionPHID` is so you can load chat context efficiently. Specifically, if you want to show results like this:
> previous line of context
> **line of chat that matches the query**
> next line of context
...you can read the previous lines out of `previousTransactionPHID` directly, and the next lines by issuing one query with `WHERE previousTransactionPHID IN (...)`.
I'm not 100% sure this is useful, but it seemed like a reasonable thing to provide, since there's no way to query this efficiently otherwise and I figure a lot of chat might make way more sense with a couple of lines of context.
Test Plan:
- Indexed a thread manually (whole thing indexed).
- Indexed a thread by updating it (just the new comment indexed).
- Wrote a hacky test script and got reasonable-looking query results.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T3165
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D11234
Summary: Modernize remaining edges to subclass `PhabricatorEdgeType`. Largely based on D11045.
Test Plan: Browsed around and performed various actions include subscribing, unsubscribing and watching.
Reviewers: #blessed_reviewers, epriestley
Reviewed By: #blessed_reviewers, epriestley
Subscribers: epriestley
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D11116
Summary:
Ref T4411
I'm not quite sure if this is the right place for this as it will be difficult to provide proper user feedback of why we removed a particular subscriber.
Is the ApplicationTransactionEditor generally the right place to extract mentioned phids in comments?
On the other hand in some cases we cannot really give user feedback why a user was not subscribed (e.g.: commits & diffs)
Adding a diff to a repo where the user mentioned has no view permissions the subscriber is currently still added. Still would have to find where this is donet...
Any other places?
Unrelated: Is there any way to remove a subscriber from a commit/audit ?
Test Plan:
- Edited tasks with the mentioned user having view permissions to this specific task and without
- Raised concern with a commit and commented on the audit with the user having view permissions to the repo and without
- Added a commit to a repo with and without the mentioned user having permissions
- Mention a user in a task & commit comment with and without permissions
- Mentioning a user in a diff description & comments with and without permissions to the specific diff
Reviewers: chad, #blessed_reviewers, epriestley
Reviewed By: #blessed_reviewers, epriestley
Subscribers: chad, Korvin, epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T4411
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D11049
Summary: These classes are named differently from other `PhabricatorEdgeType` subclasses. Rename them for consistency.
Test Plan: I would expect the linter to complain if I missed anything.
Reviewers: epriestley, #blessed_reviewers
Reviewed By: epriestley, #blessed_reviewers
Subscribers: Korvin, epriestley
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D11112
Summary: Fixes T6727. Repro is: mention a task on another task, in a comment.
The inverse edge editor applying the "alincoln mentioned this in <other task>" transaction doesn't have enough data to execute Herald rules.
Just don't try to execute the rules, since they don't make much sesne from a product perspective and are tricky from a technical perspective.
Test Plan: Commented on `T1` with `T2` in comment body and a Herald rule that examines subscribers.
Reviewers: btrahan
NOTE: Cowboy committing this since any task mention fatals.
Summary: Only necessary for edits, only bother if the comment version is greater than 1. Ref T6690. This is another way to fix T6690 -- this check will never run since you can't edit a conpherence comment -- **but** the fix already applied should happen too to future proof Conpherence.
Test Plan: made a comment on a diff - success. edited the comment and mentions were generated.
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: Korvin, epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T6690
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10928
Summary: Fixes T6648. We do some automagical hotness based on the text you enter in remarkup textareas - e.g. adding projects or mentioning other objects. Refine the code here so that even when just editing a comment we build these transactions and apply them.
Test Plan: edited a comment and noted new mentions and projects showed up appropriately...!
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: Korvin, epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T6648
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10922
Summary: Ref T1217, Add link to email preferences to email template
Test Plan: Add comment to object like Maniphest task, check that email has a footer with a link to email preferences.
Reviewers: epriestley, #blessed_reviewers
Reviewed By: epriestley, #blessed_reviewers
Subscribers: Korvin, epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T1217
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10883
Summary: Ref T6343, adding HTMLMailMode to remarkup, and most objects should now be processed and appear pretty in emails.
Test Plan: Add a comment to a Maniphest task containing a mention of an object like '{T1}' or 'T1'. Emails should show a styled version of the object similar to how the object looks in the context of the Maniphest task in the UI.
Reviewers: epriestley, #blessed_reviewers
Reviewed By: epriestley, #blessed_reviewers
Subscribers: chad, Korvin, epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T6343, T2617
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10859
Summary: Fixes T6059.
Test Plan: Made a comment on TX mentioning TX and TX+1. TX did not get a "mentioned" transaction while TX+1 did.
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: epriestley, Korvin
Maniphest Tasks: T6059
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10464
Summary: Fixes T4036. Now if you say something on diff X like "This reminds me of Tx and Dy and commitHashFoo and Px." each of those objects gets a little visible transaction that the mention occurred. No feed, email, or notifications.
Test Plan: made a comment like above and verified transactions. also submitted a diff that "Fixes Tx" and Tx did not get the transaction as expected.
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: joshuaspence, epriestley, Korvin
Maniphest Tasks: T4036
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10451
Summary: Fixes T6037. We don't currently write the "this file is attached to such-and-such object" edge on comment edits.
Test Plan: Edited a comment, adding `{Fnnn}`. Verified file was not attached before the edit, but was afterward.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T6037
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10423
Summary:
Added support for side-by-side HTML and plaintext email building.
We can control if the HTML stuff is sent by by a new config, metamta.html-emails
Test Plan:
Been running this in our deployment for a few months now.
====Well behaved clients====
- Gmail
- Mail.app
====Bad clients====
- [[ http://airmailapp.com/ | Airmail ]]. They confuse Gmail too, though.
====Need testing====
- Outlook (Windows + Mac)
Reviewers: chad, #blessed_reviewers, epriestley
Reviewed By: #blessed_reviewers, epriestley
Subscribers: webframp, taoqiping, chad, epriestley, Korvin
Maniphest Tasks: T992
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D9375
Summary: Fixes T4973. For `PhabricatorProjectInterface` objects, add a header to let clients do mail filtering.
Test Plan: Saw `X-Phabricator-Projects: <#goat_farm>` in outbound mail.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: rush898, epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T4973
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10256
Summary:
Ref T5861. Ref T5769. If users don't care at all about something, allow them to ignore it.
We have some higher-volume notifications either built now (column changes) or coming (mentions) which users might reasonably want to ignore completely.
Test Plan:
Ignored some notifications, then took appropraite actions. Saw my user culled from the notification subscriber list.
{F189531}
Reviewers: chad, btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T5769, T5861
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10240
Summary:
Ref T5861. Currently, mail tags are hard-coded; move them into applications. Each Editor defines its own tags.
This has zero impact on the UI or behavior.
Test Plan:
- Checked/unchecked some options, saved form.
- Swapped back to `master` and saw exactly the same values.
Reviewers: chad, btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T5861
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10238
Summary:
Fixes T5456. We lost this logic in the transition to applicationtransactions.
When publishing a feed story, mark all of the object's projects as related, so the project filter in feed works.
Test Plan: Made a comment on a task associated with a project, saw the story in filtered feed.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: timor, epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T5456
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10233
Summary:
- Fixes T5851. Currently, if a commit has `Fixes T123`, we generate an email with just that before generating the commit email. Don't send/publish transactions about a commit before it imports (this is a tiny bit hacky, but well-contained and I don't think it causes any problems).
- Fixes T4864. Currently, we try to parse Differential information even if Differential is not installed. Instead, do this only if Differential is installed.
- Fixes T5771. Currently, if we can't figure out who the committer/author of a commit is, we don't publish a `Fixes T123` transaction. Instead, fall back to acting as "Diffusion" if we can't find a better actor. Most of this diff expands the role of application actors. The existing application actors (Herald and Harbormaster) seem to be working well.
Test Plan:
- Pushed a commit with `Fixes T123` and verified it did not generate email directly. (The task half of the transaction still does, correctly.)
- Uninstalled Differential and pushed a commit, got a clean import instead of an exception.
- Commented out author/committer PHIDs and pushed stuff, saw a "Diffusion" actor.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T5771, T4864, T5851
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10221
Summary:
Ref T5245. This removes some hacks and activates two meaningful interactions:
- The "projects" field goes through shared code now.
- Mentioning projects in tasks using hashtags now tags them.
Test Plan:
- Viewed a task with projects.
- Viewed a task with no projects.
- Viewed a task with projects and board positions.
- Viewed a revision with projects.
- Made a `#hashtag` comment in Maniphest and got a project association.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T5245
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10177
Summary:
Ref T4896. Replaces more custom stuff with standard stuff. In particular:
- No more fake proxy writes;
- no more fake detection of `@mentions`.
For now, the old code still applies most of the effects and handles feed and email.
Test Plan:
- Added comments.
- Added comments with inline comments.
- Added just inline comments.
- Added comments with Conduit.
- Previewed comments.
- Added CCs explicitly and with `@mentions`.
- Added auditors.
- Accepted a commit.
Reviewers: joshuaspence, btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T4896
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10109
Summary: Ref T5655. Rename `PhabricatorPHIDType` subclasses for clarity (see discussion in D9839). I'm not too keen on some of the resulting class names, so feel free to suggest alternatives.
Test Plan: Ran unit tests.
Reviewers: epriestley, #blessed_reviewers
Reviewed By: epriestley, #blessed_reviewers
Subscribers: epriestley, Korvin, hach-que
Maniphest Tasks: T5655
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D9986
Summary: Ref T5655. Some discussion in D9839. Generally speaking, `Phabricator{$name}Application` is clearer than `PhabricatorApplication{$name}`.
Test Plan:
# Pinned and uninstalled some applications.
# Applied patch and performed migrations.
# Verified that the pinned applications were still pinned and that the uninstalled applications were still uninstalled.
# Performed a sanity check on the database contents.
Reviewers: btrahan, epriestley, #blessed_reviewers
Reviewed By: epriestley, #blessed_reviewers
Subscribers: hach-que, epriestley, Korvin
Maniphest Tasks: T5655
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D9982
Summary: These got removed recently but I missed one callsite.
Test Plan: Used `git grep` to double check all other callsites.
Reviewers: joshuaspence
Reviewed By: joshuaspence
Subscribers: epriestley
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D9973
Summary: Ref T5245. Updates the project/object edge to use a modern class definition. Moves further toward real edges.
Test Plan: Added projects to some objects, viewed transactions in transaction record.
Reviewers: chad, btrahan, joshuaspence
Reviewed By: joshuaspence
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T5245
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D9849
Summary:
Ref T5245. These were a bad idea.
We no longer need actors for edge edits either, so remove those. Generally, edges have fit into the policy model as pure/low-level infrastructure, and they do not have any policy or capability information in and of themselves.
Test Plan: `grep`
Reviewers: chad, btrahan, joshuaspence
Reviewed By: joshuaspence
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T5245
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D9840
Summary:
Ref T5245. See some discussion in D9838.
When we attach object A to object B, we'd like to write transactions on both sides but only write the actual edges once.
To do this, allow edge types to `shouldWriteInverseTransactions()`. When an edge type opts into this, have editors apply the inverse transactions before writing the edge. These inverse transactions don't actually apply effects, they just show up in the transaction log.
Test Plan: Attached and detached revisions from tasks, saw transactions appear on both sides of the operation.
Reviewers: chad, btrahan, joshuaspence
Reviewed By: btrahan, joshuaspence
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T5245
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D9839
Summary:
This was significantly easier than expected. Here's an example of what an extension class might look like:
```
<?php
final class AddRiskReviewHeraldCustomAction extends HeraldCustomAction {
public function appliesToAdapter(HeraldAdapter $adapter) {
return $adapter instanceof HeraldDifferentialRevisionAdapter;
}
public function appliesToRuleType($rule_type) {
return $rule_type == HeraldRuleTypeConfig::RULE_TYPE_GLOBAL ||
$rule_type == HeraldRuleTypeConfig::RULE_TYPE_OBJECT;
}
public function getActionKey() {
return 'custom:add-risk';
}
public function getActionName() {
return 'Add risk rating (JSON)';
}
public function getActionType() {
return HeraldAdapter::VALUE_TEXT;
}
public function applyEffect(
HeraldAdapter $adapter,
$object,
HeraldEffect $effect) {
$key = "phragile:risk-rating";
// Read existing value.
$field_list = PhabricatorCustomField::getObjectFields(
$object,
PhabricatorCustomField::ROLE_VIEW);
$field_list->readFieldsFromStorage($object);
$field_list = mpull($field_list->getFields(), null, 'getFieldKey');
$field = $field_list[$key];
$field->setObject($object);
$field->setViewer(PhabricatorUser::getOmnipotentUser());
$risk = $field->getValue();
$old_risk = $risk; // PHP copies arrays by default!
// Add new value to array.
$herald_args = phutil_json_decode($effect->getTarget());
$risk[$herald_args['key']] = array(
'value' => $herald_args['value'],
'reason' => $herald_args['reason']);
$risk_key = $herald_args['key'];
// Set new value.
$adapter->queueTransaction(
id(new DifferentialTransaction())
->setTransactionType(PhabricatorTransactions::TYPE_CUSTOMFIELD)
->setMetadataValue('customfield:key', $key)
->setOldValue($old_risk)
->setNewValue($risk));
return new HeraldApplyTranscript(
$effect,
true,
pht(
'Modifying automatic risk ratings (key: %s)!',
$risk_key));
}
}
```
Test Plan: Created a custom action for differential revisions, set up a Herald rule to match and trigger the custom action, did 'arc diff' and saw the action trigger in the transcripts.
Reviewers: epriestley, #blessed_reviewers
Reviewed By: epriestley, #blessed_reviewers
Subscribers: locutus, edutibau, ite-klass, epriestley, Korvin
Maniphest Tasks: T4884
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D8784
Summary:
Fixes T5489. Currently, if you make a `#proj` comment on an object already tagged with `#proj`, you get a "no effect" dialog.
Instead, continue if these transactions produce no effect (this is normal/expected, and consistent with `@user`).
Test Plan: Made two `#proj` comments in a row on a revision.
Reviewers: joshuaspence, chad
Reviewed By: chad
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T5489
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D9745
Summary: Ran `arc lint --apply-patches --everything` over rP, mainly to change double quotes to single quotes where appropriate. These changes also validate that the `ArcanistXHPASTLinter::LINT_DOUBLE_QUOTE` rule is working as expected.
Test Plan: Eyeballed it.
Reviewers: #blessed_reviewers, epriestley
Reviewed By: #blessed_reviewers, epriestley
Subscribers: epriestley, Korvin, hach-que
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D9431
Summary: Ref T2628. This makes Transactions understand objects that can have project relationships, extract project mentions, and handle watching.
Test Plan: See next diff.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T2628
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D9340
Summary:
Ref T4967. Adds a "Watch" relationship to projects, which is stronger than member/subscribed.
Specifically, when a task is tagged with a project, we'll include all project watchers in the email/notifications. Normally we don't include projects unless they're explicitly CC'd, or have some other active role in the object (like being a reviewer or auditor).
This allows you to closely follow a project without needing to write a Herald rule for every project you care about.
Test Plan:
- Watched/unwatched a project.
- Tested the watch/subscribe/member relationships:
- Watching implies subscribe.
- Joining implies subscribe.
- Leaving implies unsubscribe + unwatch.
- You can't unsubscribe until you unwatch (slightly better would be unsubscribe implies unwatch, but this is a bit tricky).
- Watched a project, then recevied email about a tagged task without otherwise being involved.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T4967
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D9185
Summary:
Fixes T4909. Adds a "remove" link next to the edit link, which permanently hides a comment. Addresses two use cases:
- Allowing administrators to clean up spam.
- Allowing users to try to put the genie back in the bottle if they post passwords or sensitive links, etc.
The user who removed the comment is named in the removal text to enforce some level of administrative accountability.
No data is deleted, but there's currently no method to restore these comments. We'll see if we need one.
This is cheating a little bit by storing "removed" as "2" in the isDeleted field. This doesn't seem tooooo bad for now.
Test Plan:
- Removed some of my comments.
- As an administrator, removed other users' comments.
- Failed to view history of a removed comment.
- Failed to edit a removed comment.
- Failed to remove a removed comment.
- Verified feed doesn't show the old comment after comment removal.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: qgil, chad, epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T4909
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D8945
Summary:
In some applications, using `{V2}` syntax to embed a vote throws. The chain of causality looks like this:
- We try to render a `phabricator_form()`.
- This requires a CSRF token.
- We look for a CSRF token on the user.
- It's an omnipotent user with no token, so everything fails.
To resolve this, make sure we always pass the real user in.
Test Plan:
- Lots of `grep`.
- Made a Differential comment with `{V2}`.
- Made a Diffusion comment with `{V2}`.
- Made a Maniphest comment with `{V2}`.
- Replied to a Conpherence thread with `{V2}`.
- Created a Conpherence thread with `{V2}`.
- Used Conduit to update a Conpherence thread with `{V2}`.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley, lkassianik
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D8849
Summary: The token transactions can publish empty transaction feed stories.
Stop them from doing that, and make notifications fail more quietly.
Auditors: btrahan
Summary:
Ref T1049. When Harbormaster tests pass, don't bother sending an email about it.
(I tried to implement this earlier but didn't test it entirely properly, and we needed a little more code.)
Test Plan: Used `bin/harbormaster build` to build some junk, got no email about passes.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T1049
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D8813
Summary:
Fixes T4810. When a buildable completes, make an effort to update the corresponding object with a success or failure message. Commits don't support this yet, but revisions do.
{F144614}
Test Plan:
- Used `bin/harbormaster build` and `bin/harbormaster update` to run a pile of builds.
- Tried good/bad builds.
- Sent some normal mail to make sure the mail reentrancy change didn't break stuff.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T4810
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D8803
Summary: See IRC. Some users are having difficulty figuring out why Herald is taking some actions. Make it easier to get to the transcript.
Test Plan: {F144622}
Reviewers: btrahan, chad
Reviewed By: chad
Subscribers: dctrwatson, epriestley
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D8804
Summary: This "Reply to comment, etc., etc." section got lost along the way at some point. Restore it for transaction mail.
Test Plan: Received mail from Maniphest with reply instructions.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D8700
Summary: Ref T418. Fixes T4642. The "changes since last update" and "branch" fields got dropped; restore them in a general, field-driven way.
Test Plan:
- Created a revision, got relevant sections in mail.
- Commented on a revision, got relevant sections in mail.
- Updated a revision, got relevant sections in mail.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: spicyj, epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T418, T4642
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D8657
Summary: Fixes T4629. CCs added by Herald don't get added to the cached subscriber list. Just reload subscribers before sending mail to pick up effects.
Test Plan: Created an "always add X as CC" Herald rule for revisions, created a revision, saw them get initial mail.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: spicyj, epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T4629
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D8565
Summary:
Fixes T4362. If you have a default edit + view policy of "no one" things get weird when you try to create a task - basically its impossible.
Ergo, re-jigger how we do policy checks just a bit.
- if its a new object, don't bother with the "can the $actor edit this thing by virtue of having can see / can edit priveleges?" That makes no sense on create.
- add a hook so when doing the "will $actor still be able to edit this thing after all the edits" checks the object can be updated to its ultimate state. This matters for Maniphest as being the owner lets you do all sorts of stuff.
Test Plan:
- made a task with no one policy and assigned to no one - exception
- made a task with no one policy and assigned to me - success
- made a comment on the task - success
- reassigned the task to another user - exception
- reassigned the task to another user and updated policies to "users" - success
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: aran, epriestley, Korvin
Maniphest Tasks: T4362
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D8508
Summary:
Ref T2222. Brings the major mail features (affected files, patches) forward.
This drops some of the minor integrations which just show object state (like "Maniphest Tasks") since I think they're not very important. I'll put them back if users miss them.
Test Plan: Sent mail with inline/attached patches.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T2222
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D8459
Summary: Ref T2222. Ref T3794. Medium term goal is to remove `DifferentialRevisionEditor`. This removes one of two callsites.
Test Plan: Used `arc diff --edit` to repeatedly update a revision, making changes to various fields.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T3794, T2222
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D8451
Summary: Ref T2222. Update this callsite; pretty straightforward.
Test Plan: Used Conduit to take actions and saw their effects in Differential.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T2222
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D8442
Summary: Ref T2222. Straightforward update to new stuff.
Test Plan:
- Tried to close an uncloseable revision.
- Closed a closeable revision.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T2222
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D8425
Summary:
Ref T2222. Ref T4484. See D8404 for discussion.
When a revision is updated with the new Editor, apply Herald rules. Additionally, apply them in a modern way which generates transactions.
Test Plan: {F122299}
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran, chad
Maniphest Tasks: T2222, T4484
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D8405
Summary:
Ref T2222. Ref T4484. This is a stepping stone to getting Herald supported in the new Differental code. Generally:
- Instead of an Editor either supporting or not supporting Herald, let it choose based on transactions. Specifically, Differential only runs rules on revision creation and diff updates.
- Optionally, allow an Editor to return some transactions to apply instead of having to apply everything itself. This lets us make it clear why changes happend in the transaction log, and share more code.
- I updated only one transaction type (owners in Maniphest) since it was the easiest and cleanest to update and test. Everything else still works like it used to, it just won't generate a transaction record yet.
- The transaction records are a touch rough, but we can clean them up later.
Test Plan: {F122282}
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T4484, T2222
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D8404
Summary:
Ref T2222. Five very small improvements:
- I hit this exception and it took a bit to understand which transaction was causing problems. Add an `Exception` subclass which does a better job of making the message debuggable.
- The `oldValue` of a transaction may be `null`, legitimately (for example, changing the `repositoryPHID` for a revision from `null` to some valid PHID). Do a check to see if `setOldValue()` has been called, instead of a check for a `null` value.
- Add an additional check for the other case (shouldn't have a value, but does).
- When we're not generating a value, don't bother calling the code to generate it. The best case scenario is that it has no effect; any effect it might have (changing the value) is always wrong.
- Maniphest didn't fall back to the parent correctly when computing this flag, so it got the wrong result for `CustomField` transactions.
Test Plan: Resolved the issue I was hitting more easily, made updates to a `null`-valued custom field, and applied other normal sorts of transactions successfully.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T4557, T2222
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D8401
Summary:
Fixes T4550 by changing supportsFeed to shouldPublishFeedStory, so things can be more granular like that are with mail. Attempts to fix things generally too, filtering out xactions that have no business in feed, etc.
Also return an updated Task HTML representation on drag and drop moves, etc. This is important so if the priority changes you can see it reflected in the UI.
Test Plan: dragged tasks around. observed no feed stories on subpriority drags. observed feed stories and updated color bars on stories that changed priority
Reviewers: epriestley, chad
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: Korvin, epriestley, aran
Maniphest Tasks: T4550
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D8399
Summary:
adds ManiphestTransaction::TYPE_PROJECT_COLUMN and makes it work. Had to clean up the Javascript ever so slightly as it was sending up the string "null" when it should just omit the data in these cases. Ref T4422.
NOTE: this is overall a bit buggy - e.g. move a task Foo from column A to top of column B; refresh; task Foo is at bottom of column B and should be at top of column B - but I plan on additional diff or three to clean this up.
Test Plan: dragged tasks around columns. clicked on those tasks and saw some nice transactions.
Reviewers: epriestley
CC: Korvin, epriestley, aran
Maniphest Tasks: T4422
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D8366
Summary:
Ref T2222. Differential has certain "words of power" (like `Ref T123` or `Depends on D345`) which should expand into a separate transaction when they appear anywhere in text.
Currently, they're respected in only some fields. I'm expanding them to work in any remarkup field, including comments and inline comments.
This partially generalizes transaction expansion/extraction in comments. Eventually, I'll probably implement some very soft sort of reference edge for T4036, maybe.
Test Plan: {F119368}
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T2222
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D8369
Summary: Ref T2222. This updates the new JIRA field to be editable.
Test Plan: Used `/editpro/` to edit associated JIRA issues.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T2222
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D8364
Summary: Ref T2222. This enriches mail a little bit to get these rendering pretty much like they do now.
Test Plan: {F118255}
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T2222
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D8343
Summary:
Ref T2222. This requires one new trick:
- When merging edge transactions which both add/update an edge, the Editor gets to control how the edge data is merged.
Specifically, we pick the "strongest" state to keep, so "accept + comment" leaves you with an accept instead of a comment.
Test Plan: Accepted, commented on, and comment + accepted revisions. Added some debugging dumps to verify that the merging was getting hit and working correctly.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T2222
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D8340
Summary:
Ref T2222. This doesn't feel super clean, but doesn't feel too bad either.
Basically, Differential transactions can have secondary state-based effects (changing the overall revision status) when reviewers resign, are removed, accept, or reject revisions.
To deal with this in ApplicationTransactions, I did this:
- `applyFinalEffects()` can now alter the transaction set (notably, add new ones). This mostly matters for email, notifications and feed.
- In Differential, check for an overall revision state transition in `applyFinalEffects()` (e.g., your reject moving the revision to a rejected state).
- I'm only writing the transaction if the transition is implied and indirect.
- For example, if you "Plan Changes", that action changes the state on its own so there's no implicit state change transaction added.
The transactions themselves are kind of fluff, but it seems useful to keep a record of when state changes occurred in the transaction log. If people complain we can hide/remove them.
Test Plan: {F118143}
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T2222
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D8339
Summary:
Ref T2222. This introduces two small new concepts:
- `expandTransactions()`: allows a transaction to expand into several transactions. For example, "resign" adds a "remove reviewers" transaction.
- We have some other cases which could use this, but currently hard-code things outside of the `Editor`.
- One example is that in Maniphest, closing a task implies claiming it if it is unowned.
- `setIgnoreOnNoEffect()`: The whole Editor can be set to continue or stop if any transactions have no effect, but this allows the behavior to be refined at the individual transaction level. This is primarily to make the UX less confusing, so the user gets only a single relevant error instead of one for each expanded transaction.
Otherwise, this is pretty straightforward.
Test Plan:
Rigged comment form to use SavePro controller, enabled resign action, then tried to resign from a bunch of stuff.
{F117743}
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: chad, aran
Maniphest Tasks: T2222
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D8328
Summary: Ref T2222. Makes the "pro" controller work with inlines.
Test Plan: Added a bunch of inlines and saved them with the "pro" controller.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T2222
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D8306
Summary: Ref T2222. Adds a mostly-functional "Pro" comment controller. This does the core stuff, but does not yet do actions (accept, reject, etc.) or inline comments.
Test Plan: Changed the `if (false)` to an `if (true)`, then made some comments, etc. This is normally unreachable.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T2222
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D8304
Summary:
Ref T3886. Ref T418.
- Adds "View Policy" and "Edit Policy" fields.
- Allows CustomFields to produce arbitrary types of transactions, so these fields can produce standard view/edit policy transactions and get all the strings and validation associated with them.
Test Plan: {F116001}
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T418, T3886
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D8287
Summary: so it was said in IRC and so it is true
Test Plan: saving maniphest tasks with custom fields no longer barfs
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: Korvin, epriestley, aran
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D8279
Summary:
Ref T4379. Fixes T4359. Currently, `bin/search index` does not rebuild CustomField indexes. This is because they aren't really part of the main search index. However, from a user's point of view this is by far the most logical place to look for index rebuilds, and it's straightforward for us to write into this secondary store.
At some point, it might be nice to let you specify fields as "fulltext" too, although no one has asked for that yet. We could then dump the text of those fields into the fulltext index. Ref T418.
Test Plan: Used `bin/search index --type proj --trace`, etc., and examination of the database to verify that indexes rebuilt. Reindexed users, tasks, projects.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T4359, T418, T4379
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D8185
Summary:
Ref T4379. Currently, you can edit away your edit capability in Projects. Prevent this in a general way.
Since some objects have complex edit policies (like "the owner can always edit"), we can't just check the value itself. We also can't fairly assume that every object has a `setEditPolicy()` method, even though almost all do right now. Instead, provide a way to pretend we've completed the edit and changed the policy.
Test Plan: Unit tests, tried to edit away my edit capability.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T4379
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D8179
Summary:
Ref T4379. Perform all editing with modern transaction infrastructure. A few practical changes here:
- Message for "project name required" should be a little nicer. I'll deal with this once more stuff gets straightened out. You get a reasonable message now, it's just not nicely handled as part of the form.
- Message for "project name is not unique" should be a little nicer. Same as above.
- Previously, we would automatically archive a project when the last member left or was removed. I'll probably restore this in a bit but am omitting it for the moment for simplicity.
- Previously, we would create projects with goofy nonsensical permissions. Now we create them with reasonable permissions.
Test Plan:
- Created project.
- Edited project.
- Ran unit tests.
- Viewed project edit history.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T4379
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D8168
Summary:
Ref T4379. When you add a redundant edge, we currently compare the values strictly, using `===`. However, the old and new versions of the edge have slightly different member data, because one has been synthetically constructed and one has been read from the database.
Instead, compare only the things we actually care about:
# Were any destintations added or removed?
# Was any edge data changed?
If the answer to both questions is "no", consider the update a no-op.
Test Plan: In the next diff, I'm making project members use the EDGE transaction type. Before this change, adding an existing project member would generate a transaction with no changes. Now, it is correctly detected as a no-op, while normal transactions continue to work properly.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T4379
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D8166
Summary: ...and surface it in all adapters except commit adapters. Values are true or false. Ref T4294
Test Plan: made a herald rule to be cc'd on new tasks. was cc'd on new tasks and not cc'd on updates to existing tasks.
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: Korvin, epriestley, aran
Maniphest Tasks: T4294
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D8142
Summary:
Ref T4175.
- Add a configurable name for the clone-as directory, so you can have "Bits & Pieces" clone as "bits~n~pieces/" or simliar.
- By default, use "reasonable" heruistics to choose such a name.
- Generate a copy/pasteable clone commmand with this directory name.
Test Plan: Looked at some repositories.
Reviewers: btrahan, chad
Reviewed By: chad
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T4175
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D8097
Summary: Fixes T3857. Earlier work made this trivial and just left product questions, which I've answered by requiring the daemons to run on reasonable installs.
Test Plan: Ran `bin/search index` and `bin/search index --background`. Observed indexes write in the former case and tasks queue in the latter case. Commented with a unique string on a revision and searched for it a moment later, got exactly one result (that revision), verifying that reindexing works correctly.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T3857
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D7966
Summary:
Ref T4122. Implements a credential management application for the uses described in T4122.
@chad, this needs an icon, HA HA HAHA HA BWW HA HA HA
bwahaha
Test Plan: See screenshots.
Reviewers: btrahan, chad
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: chad, aran
Maniphest Tasks: T4122
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D7608
Summary:
This is primarily a client request, and a little bit use-case specific, but policies seem to be holding up well and I'm getting more comfortable about maintaining this. Much if it can run through ApplicationTransactions.
Allow the ability to edit status, policies, priorities, assignees and projects of a task to be restricted to some subset of users. Also allow bulk edit to be locked. This affects the editor itself and the edit, view and list interfaces.
Test Plan: As a restricted user, created, edited and commented on tasks. Tried to drag them around.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D7357
Summary:
We have this commented-out chunk of code now which was originally buggy and is now just nonfunctional.
For now, the core edit types don't always require CAN_EDIT (e.g., subscribe, comment, add edges), except for editing the edit policy itself, which always does. Add a supplemental capability check there and let everything else go through with CAN_VIEW. We can buff the policy checks on application editors over time, they all require appropriate capabilities to get to in the first place anyway.
Test Plan: Created and edited some tasks without getting overwhelmed with policy exceptions.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D7351
Summary: Ref T603. Fixes T3921. Tightens up policy controls for file/object relationships in existing applications.
Test Plan:
- Uploaded new project image, verified it got an edge to the project.
- Uploaded new profile image, verified it got an edge to me.
- Uploaded new macro image, verified it got an edge to the macro.
- Uploaded new paste via web UI and conduit, verified it got attached.
- Replaced, added images to a mock, verified they got edges.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T3921, T603
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D7254
Summary: Ref T603. When a user comments on an object with an embedded file, write an "attached" edge.
Test Plan: Made a comment on a task with an embedded file, verified the edge was written in Files.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T603
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D7191
Summary: ...and deploy on Maniphest. Ref T1638.
Test Plan: created a herald rule to be cc'd for tasks created via web. made a task via web and another via email and was cc'd appropriately. edited the herald to be cc'd for tasks created via not web. made 2 tasks again and got cc'd appropriately
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: Korvin, aran
Maniphest Tasks: T1638
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D7145
Summary:
We currently try to send Maniphest email "To" the owner and actor, but for unassigned tasks there is no owner.
Just filter the PHIDs in the parent, since it's reasonable for subclasses to be liberal about construction here.
Test Plan: Commented on an unassigned task, got an email without a bogus "To".
Reviewers: btrahan, asherkin
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D7129
Summary: Ref T2217. Pro is the new standard.
Test Plan: Lots of `grep`, made a pile of Maniphest views/edits.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T2217
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D7093
Summary: Ref T2217. This is essentially the last writer, should be able to start deleting code now.
Test Plan: Used "Edit Task" to make a bunch of task edits.
Reviewers: btrahan, garoevans
Reviewed By: garoevans
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T2217
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D7090
Summary: Ref T2217. Nothing too surprising here. This transaction type is weird and should be replaced with the mainstream EDGE type at some point after things clear up more.
Test Plan: Attached and detached revisions and mocks.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T2217
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D7085
Summary:
Ref T2217. Ship "Merge in Duplicates" through the new editor. The only notable thing here is `setContinueOnMissingFields()`.
The problem this solves is that if you add a custom field and mark it as required, all existing tasks are "invalid" since they don't have a value, and trying to edit them will raise an error like "Some Custom Field is required!". This is fine for normal edits via the UI, since the user can just select/provide a value, but surgical edits to specific fields should just ignore these errors. Add the ability to ignore these errors and use it on all the field-speific editors.
Test Plan: Merged duplicates, including "invalid" duplicates with missing fields.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T2217
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D7084
Summary: Ref T2217. All the reads route through new code already, start swapping writes over. This is the simplest writer, used when the user drag-and-drops stuff on the task list.
Test Plan: Dragged and dropped stuff across priorities. Got a transaction and some email. Verified the email and transaction looked OK, threaded properly, etc.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T2217
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D7080
Summary:
Ref T418. This is fairly messy, but basically:
- Add a validation phase to TransactionEditor.
- Add a validation phase to CustomField.
- Bring it to StandardField.
- Add validation logic for the int field.
- Provide support in related classes.
Test Plan: See screenshot.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T418
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D7028
Summary:
Ref T2625. Ref T3794. Ref T418. Ref T1703.
This is a more general version of D5278. It expands CustomField support to include real integration with ApplicationSearch.
Broadly, custom fields may elect to:
- build indicies when objects are updated;
- populate ApplicationSearch forms with new controls;
- read inputs entered into those controls out of the request; and
- apply constraints to search queries.
Some utility/helper stuff is provided to make this easier. This part could be cleaner, but seems reasonable for a first cut. In particular, the Query and SearchEngine must manually call all the hooks right now instead of everything happening magically. I think that's fine for the moment; they're pretty easy to get right.
Test Plan:
I added a new searchable "Company" field to People:
{F58229}
This also cleaned up the disable/reorder view a little bit:
{F58230}
As it did before, this field appears on the edit screen:
{F58231}
However, because it has `search`, it also appears on the search screen:
{F58232}
When queried, it returns the expected results:
{F58233}
And the actually good bit of all this is that the query can take advantage of indexes:
mysql> explain SELECT * FROM `user` user JOIN `user_customfieldstringindex` `appsearch_0` ON `appsearch_0`.objectPHID = user.phid AND `appsearch_0`.indexKey = 'mk3Ndy476ge6' AND `appsearch_0`.indexValue IN ('phacility') ORDER BY user.id DESC LIMIT 101;
+----+-------------+-------------+--------+-------------------+----------+---------+------------------------------------------+------+----------------------------------------------+
| id | select_type | table | type | possible_keys | key | key_len | ref | rows | Extra |
+----+-------------+-------------+--------+-------------------+----------+---------+------------------------------------------+------+----------------------------------------------+
| 1 | SIMPLE | appsearch_0 | ref | key_join,key_find | key_find | 232 | const,const | 1 | Using where; Using temporary; Using filesort |
| 1 | SIMPLE | user | eq_ref | phid | phid | 194 | phabricator2_user.appsearch_0.objectPHID | 1 | |
+----+-------------+-------------+--------+-------------------+----------+---------+------------------------------------------+------+----------------------------------------------+
2 rows in set (0.00 sec)
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T418, T1703, T2625, T3794
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6992
Summary: Deploy on paste and macro for create stories, 'cuz those are boring emails. Fixes T3808.
Test Plan: made a paste and a macro. commented on 'em. verified i got mail on comments only.
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: Korvin, aran
Maniphest Tasks: T3808
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6988
Summary: Ref T603. Killing this class is cool because the classes that replace it are policy-aware. Tried to keep my wits about me as I did this and fixed a few random things along the way. (Ones I remember right now are pulling a query outside of a foreach loop in Releeph and fixing the text in UIExample to note that the ace of hearts if "a powerful" card and not the "most powerful" card (Q of spades gets that honor IMO))
Test Plan: tested the first few changes (execute, executeOne X handle, object) then got real mechanical / careful with the other changes.
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: Korvin, aran, FacebookPOC
Maniphest Tasks: T603
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6941
Summary: Ref T2766. Does the integration via ApplicationTransactionsEditor. Only did addCC and Flag for proof of concept.
Test Plan: Made a rule to cc, made a rule to flag. They worked! (will attach screens to diff)
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: Korvin, aran
Maniphest Tasks: T2766
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6766
Summary: Currently, we check that the user can view and edit their own transaction, which is always true. Instead, check that they can view the object. I'll fix this with a more tailored check against the EDIT capability that's per-transaction later.
Test Plan: Applying no transactions no longer fatals with undefined `$xaction`.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6754
Summary:
Ref T1703. Ref T3718. The `PhabricatorCustomFieldList` seems like a pretty good idea. Move more code into it to make it harder to get wrong.
Also the sequencing on old/new values for these transactions was a bit off; fix that up.
Test Plan: Edited standard and custom profile fields.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T1703, T3718
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6751
Summary: Fixes T2654.
Test Plan: attached lots of mocks and tasks to one another from both maniphest and pholio. verified transactions rendered okay in both applications
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: aran, Korvin
Maniphest Tasks: T2654
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6501
Summary:
Nice title. We add three new transactions - IMAGE_FILE, IMAGE_NAME, and IMAGE_DESCRIPTION. The first is a bit like subscribers as it is a list of file phids. The latter have values of the form ($file_phid => $data), where $data is $name or $description respectively. This is because we need to collate transactions based on $file_phid...
Overall, this uses the _underyling files_ and not the "PholioImage" to determine if things are unique or not. That said, simply mark PholioImages as obsolete so inline comments about no-longer applicable PholioImages don't break.
Does a reasonable job implementing the mock. Note you can't "update" an image at this time, though you can delete and add at will.
Test Plan: played with pholio a ton.
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: chad, aran, Korvin
Maniphest Tasks: T3489
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6441
Summary: in applyExternalEffects, for subscriber transactions, we now re-load subscribers. also fixes a bug where a user can get emailed 2x when they take an action on a mock they created.
Test Plan: made some mocks. verified one copy sent to creator and one to each subscriber. (note having problems with email so I verified the phids mail was supposed to be sent to and did not get the actual email delivered)
Reviewers: epriestley, chad
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: aran, Korvin
Maniphest Tasks: T3315
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6206
