Summary: Ref T10032, adds "Basic" NUX to more applications.
Test Plan: Visit each with ?nux=true and click on the create link. T10032 is tracking which apps need general modernization to pick up these changes.
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: Korvin
Maniphest Tasks: T10032
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D14847
Summary:
Ref T10004. This restores "alice created this task." transactions, but in a generic way so we don't have to special case one of the other edits with an old `null` value.
In most cases, creating an object now shows only an "alice created this thing." transaction, unless nonempty defaults (usually, policy or spaces) were adjusted.
Test Plan: Created pastes, tasks, blogs, packages, and forms. Saw a single "alice created this thing." transaction.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T10004
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D14820
Summary:
Ref T10004. Tweaks some of the UX a little to be more intuitive/inviting?
- Button says "Configure Form" instead of "Actions".
- Root list is less "developer-ey" and more "explain what this is for-ey".
Test Plan:
{F1028928}
{F1028929}
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T10004
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D14808
Summary:
Ref T9964. Three goals here:
- Make it easier to supply Conduit documentation.
- Make automatic documentation for `*.edit` endpoints more complete, particularly for custom fields.
- Allow type resolution via Conduit types, so you can pass `["alincoln"]` to "subscribers" instead of needing to use PHIDs.
Test Plan:
- Viewed and used all search and edit endpoints, including custom fields.
- Used parameter type resolution to set subscribers to user "dog" instead of "PHID-USER-whatever".
- Viewed HTTP parameter documentation.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T9964
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D14796
Summary:
Ref T9964.
- New mechanism for rich documentation on unusual/complicated edits.
- Add some docs to `paths.set` since it's not self-evident what you're supposed to pass in.
Test Plan: {F1027177}
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T9964
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D14791
Summary: Ref T9964. Fixes T9752. Provides API access to enable/disable packages and change their paths.
Test Plan:
- Changed status via Conduit.
- Changed paths via Conduit.
- Tried to change a path use a nonsense/bogus repository PHID, got an error.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T9752, T9964
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D14790
Summary: Ref T9964. This just adds more structure to application fields, to make it harder to make typos and easier to validate them later.
Test Plan: Viewed APIs, called some APIs, saw good documentation and correct results.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T9964
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D14776
Summary:
Ref T9964.
- Add a "paths" attachment for fetching paths.
- Always load owners. We will need this to do policy checks in the future, anyway, and this data is not large, is very useful, and is reasonable to load unconditionally.
Test Plan:
- Queried packages via API.
- Edited packages (paths, owners).
- Created a package.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T9964
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D14775
Summary: Ref T9964. Builds on D14772. Allows callers to get the raw content of pastes as an attachment.
Test Plan:
- Read docs.
- Executed attachment query.
- Saw raw paste content.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T9964
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D14774
Summary: Ref T9964. I left a couple of these unsupported for now since they're weird in some way.
Test Plan: {F1024031}
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T9964
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D14767
Summary:
Ref T9964. Fill in more parameter types and descriptions.
(No date support yet since it's a bit more involved.)
Test Plan: {F1024022}
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T9964
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D14766
Summary:
Ref T9964. Adds a new-style "owners.search" endpoint, and an extension for customfields.
Puts enough indirection in place to give us nice, consistent "custom.key" user-facing keys instead of "std:custom:owners:na0shf9a8dfdsafl" junk.
Test Plan:
- Searched Owners via API.
- Searched by ID.
- Ordered by custom fields.
- Reviewed API docs.
- Used normal search with ordering.
- Viewed custom field values in search results.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T9964
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D14758
Summary:
Fixes T9945. This is straightforward.
The two sub-object types are very lightweight so I just deleted them directly instead of loading + delete()'ing (or implementing DestructibleInterface on them, which would require they have PHIDs).
Also improve a US English localization.
Test Plan:
- Used `bin/remove destroy PHID-... --trace` to destroy a package.
- Verified it was gone.
- Inspected the SQL in the log for general reasonableness.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T9945
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D14729
Summary:
Ref T9132. Ref T9908. Fixes T5622. This allows you to copy some fields (projects, subscribers, custom fields, some per-application) from another object when creating a new object by passing the `?template=xyz` parameter.
Extend "copy" support to work with all custom fields.
Test Plan:
- Created new pastes, packages, tasks using `?template=...`
- Viewed new template docs page.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T5622, T9132, T9908
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D14699
Summary:
Ref T9132. Paste is in fairly good shape so Owners is up next. Reasoning:
- One install wants API access for it.
- It's a simple application for getting CustomFields working with EditEngine.
This only does the EditEngine part, so CustomFields are no longer editable until I make that work. That will be up next, and I'll hold this until that's ready.
Test Plan:
- Created and edited packages via web UI.
- Created and edited package editing forms via web UI.
- Created and edited packages via Conduit.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T9132
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D14598
Summary:
Ref T9787. To fix this, I want to change how file PHIDs are extracted slightly: specifically, I'm going to extract them later in the editing process.
Before doing this, clean up a couple of bad implementations:
- Owners extracts its description as a file PHID. This is an error.
- Extract the description as a remarkup block instead.
- Add an edge table so stuff like file attachment works properly.
- Differential has a no-op extract method. This is presumably just a copy/paste issue from long ago.
Test Plan:
- Edited a revision in Differential.
- Dropped a file into the description of an Owners package.
- Before change: this did not attach the file.
- After change: the file now attaches properly and shows up as "Attached" in the file details.
Reviewers: chad, joshuaspence
Reviewed By: joshuaspence
Subscribers: joshuaspence
Maniphest Tasks: T9787
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D14493
Summary:
Ref T9482. This button goes to the wrong place and this table conditionally hides itself so I missed it.
Instead:
- Always show the table, with an empty string if there are no relevant commits.
- Link to a working UI.
Test Plan: Saw table. Clicked button.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T9482
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D14189
Summary: You can already pass other icons, but this makes it a bit simpler.
Test Plan: Test Maniphest, Badges
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: Korvin
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D14131
Summary: Fixes T9351. This is straightforward since this application is now relatively modern and doesn't have any bizarre craziness.
Test Plan:
{F787981}
{F787982}
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T9351
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D14093
Summary:
Fixes T9302. This datasource wasn't resolving package PHIDs correctly for the actual query.
Also fixes an issue with the "Affected packages that need audit" Herald rule.
Test Plan: Ran a "Needs Audit" query with only packages, and only `packages(user)`.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T9302
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D14029
Summary:
Ref T8320. I missed this a while ago and then it came to me in a dream.
Only consider paths in the same repo when looking at ownership.
(I think this is rarely reachable in practice.)
Test Plan: Verified that files and commits still listed ownership properly.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T8320
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D14022
Summary:
Fixes T9218. Fixes T8320. Fixes T8661. This isn't exhaustive but documents the stuff that cropped up in this iteration as needing documentation. In particular:
- Be explicit about multiple ownership.
- Explain value of having one place to update your giant regexp of a trillion paths.
Test Plan: Read documentation.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T8320, T8661, T9218
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D14023
Summary:
Fixes T9279. Modernizes the SearchEngine and Query classes. User-facing changes:
- Added order by commit date, default to order by commit date with newest commits first.
- Added explicit "Needs Audit by".
- Added new `packages(...)` typeahead function.
- Picked up automatic subscribers, projects, and order fields.
This changes behavior a little bit: we previously attempted to exclude, e.g., commits which a package you own needs to audit, but which you have resigned from. This is difficult in general and I think it needs a more comprehensive solution. This shouldn't impact users much, anyway.
Test Plan: {F767628}
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T9279
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D14013
Summary:
Ref T9218. See discussion there for rationale; I think this is the right behavior to pursue.
The screenshot below is pretty ugly. I think it's a lot worse than most real-world cases will be, since you have to sort of opt-in to having crazy levels of overlapping packages, and it's perfectly normal/reasonable for files owned by one package. Owners is powerful enough to let you specify sub-packages with exclusive ownership.
That said, this may be more typical than I hope. I don't think we can reduce the complexity here much for free, but it would might be reasonable to add some view options (e.g.: group by package?, show only packages I own?, show packages as icons with a tooltip?) if it's an issue.
Test Plan: {F734956}
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T9218
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D13940
Summary: Fixes T8428. Adds status to packages, allows setting and application search. I presume though these need checked elsewhere?
Test Plan: New package, edit package, archive package, run search queries.
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: Korvin
Maniphest Tasks: T8428
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D13925
Summary: This algorithm isn't quite right with respect to ordering more-specific packages correctly.
Test Plan: {F729864}
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D13929
Summary:
Ref T8320. This field doesn't have any special effects and has no reason to exist. Primary owners are always already owners.
This makes one minor implicit change to Owners: it is now possible to create a package with no owners. That seems fine; it is reasonable to create a package purely as an organizational tool and use it in, e.g., Herald.
Test Plan: Created and edited packages.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T8320
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D13921
Summary:
Ref T9201. At the root of a repository the current path is `null`, but the OwnersQuery wants strings.
This could be resolved a couple different ways, but just cast the arguments to strings since that seems reasonable enough.
Test Plan: Browsed root of a repository.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T9201
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D13919
Summary:
Ref T8320. Ref T8004. This just tries to generally modernize
It also replaces the nonfunctional "Find Owners" link with a new property that just shows owning packages.
Test Plan:
- Created and edited packages.
{F720478}
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T8004, T8320
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D13911
Summary: Move some `PhabricatorSearchField` subclasses to be adjacent to the application to which they belong. This seems generally better to me than lumping them all together in the `src/applications/search/field/` directory. I was also wondering if it makes sense to rename these subclasses as `PhabricatorXSearchField` rather than `PhabricatorSearchXField` (as per T5655), but wasn't really sure if these objects are meant to be search-fields, or just fields belonging to the #search application.
Test Plan: N/A.
Reviewers: #blessed_reviewers, epriestley
Reviewed By: #blessed_reviewers, epriestley
Subscribers: epriestley, Korvin
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D13374
Summary: Ref T8099, functionally I prefer to be able to set anything 'table-like' with `setTable` for design consistency. This looses the restriction and did some light grepping for other missed cases.
Test Plan: Test new UI, grep for other missing cases.
Reviewers: btrahan, epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: epriestley, Korvin
Maniphest Tasks: T8099
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D13471
Summary: Ref T8320. Fixes T8427. This is still a little funky because Owners has weird name rules, but should fix the bugs (unselectable packages) in T8427.
Test Plan: Browsed Owners typaheads, used various search functions.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T8320, T8427
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D13349
Summary: All classes should extend from some other class. See D13275 for some explanation.
Test Plan: `arc unit`
Reviewers: epriestley, #blessed_reviewers
Reviewed By: epriestley, #blessed_reviewers
Subscribers: epriestley, Korvin
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D13283
Summary:
Ref T6367. Removes `multiplexMail()`!
We can't pass a single body into a function which splits it anymore: we need to split recipients first, then build bodies for each recipient list. This lets us build separate bodies for each recipient's individual translation/access levels.
The new logic does this:
- First, split recipients into groups called "targets".
- Each target corresponds to one actual mail we're going to build.
- Each target has a viewer (whose translation / access levels will be used to generate the mail).
- Each target has a to/cc list (the users who we'll ultimately send the mail to).
- For each target, build a custom mail body based on the viewer's access levels and settings (language prefs not actually implemented).
- Then, deliver the mail.
Test Plan:
- Read new config help.
Then did a bunch of testing, primarily with `bin/mail list-outbound` and `bin/mail show-outbound` (to review generated mail), `bin/phd debug taskmaster` (to run daemons freely) and `bin/worker execute --id <id>` (to repeatedly test a specific piece of code after identifying an issue).
With `one-mail-per-recipient` on (default):
- Sent mail to multiple users.
- Verified mail showed up in `mail list-outbound`.
- Examined mail with `mail show-outbound`.
- Added a project that a subscriber could not see.
- Verified it was not present in `X-Phabricator-Projects`.
- Verified it was rendered as "Restricted Project" for the non-permissioned viewer.
- Added a subscriber, then changed the object policy so they could not see it and sent mail.
- Verified I received mail but the other user did not.
- Enabled public replies and verified mail generated with public addresses.
- Disabld public replies and verified mail generated with private addresses.
With `one-mail-per-recipient` off:
- Verified that one mail is sent to all recipients.
- Verified users who can not see the object are still filtered.
- Verified that partially-visible projects are completely visible in the mail (this violates policies, as documented, as the best available compromise).
- Enabled public replies and verified the mail generated with "Reply To".
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: carlsverre, epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T6367
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D13131
Summary:
Ref T8320. Fixes T8317. Fixes T2831. Fixes T8073. Fixes T7127.
There was a bug with this line:
for ($ii = 0; $ii < count($paths); $ii++) {
...because the array may be sparse if there have been deletes, so `count($paths)` might be 3, but the real keys could be `1`, `5` and `6`. I think this was the primary issue behind T7127.
The old Editor did a lot of work to try to validate paths. When a path failed to validate, it silently discarded it. This was silly and pointless: it's incredibly bad UX; and it's totally fine if users saves "invalid" paths. This was likely the cause of T8317, and probably the cause of T8073.
T2831 I'm less sure about, but I can't reproduce it and I rewrote all the logic so I suspect it's gone.
This also records and shows edits, so if stuff does keep happening it should be more clear what's going on.
I removed some adjacent stuff:
- I removed the ability to delete packages. I'll add "disable" in a future diff, plus `bin/remove destroy`, like other objects. Getting rid of this now let me get rid of all the mail stuff.
- I removed "path validation" where packages would try to automatically update in response to commits. This doesn't necessarily make sense in Git/Mercurial, is sketchy, could easily have been the source of T2831, and seems generally complicated and not very valuable. We could maybe restore it some day, but I'd like to get Owners stable before trying to do crazy stuff like that.
Test Plan: {F437687}
Reviewers: chad, btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T8317, T8073, T7127, T2831, T8320
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D13032
Summary:
Ref T8320. There's currently one enormous form; split it into a general information form (name, description, owners) and a paths form.
I think this is a little more manageable from both a UX point of view and from an "I have to convert this to use ApplicationTransactions" point of view.
Test Plan:
- Edited paths.
- Edited non-path information.
- Created new packages.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T8320
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D13026
Summary:
Ref T8320. Modernize search and major interfaces.
This slightly regresses some list view and search features; I'll probably restore some later (once the Query has proper `needX(...)` methods) and drop the rest.
Test Plan: Browsed, edited, deleted, and created packages.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T8320
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D13024
Summary: Ref T4100. Let datasources specify a more meaningful title than the class name.
Test Plan: Browsed some sources.
Reviewers: btrahan, chad
Reviewed By: chad
Subscribers: chad, epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T4100
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D12469
Summary:
Ref T4100. Ref T5595. These functions are trivial for now, but move us toward being able to define more default query behavior by default.
Future changes will give these methods meaningful, nontrivial behaviors.
Test Plan: `arc unit --everything`
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T5595, T4100
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D12454
Summary:
Ref T4100. Ref T5595.
To support a unified "Projects:" query across all applications, a future diff is going to add a set of "Edge Logic" capabilities to `PolicyAwareQuery` which write the required SELECT, JOIN, WHERE, HAVING and GROUP clauses for you.
With the addition of "Edge Logic", we'll have three systems which may need to build components of query claues: ordering/paging, customfields/applicationsearch, and edge logic.
For most clauses, queries don't currently call into the parent explicitly to get default components. I want to move more query construction logic up the class tree so it can be shared.
For most methods, this isn't a problem, but many subclasses define a `buildWhereClause()`. Make all such definitions protected and consistent.
This causes no behavioral changes.
Test Plan: Ran `arc unit --everything`, which does a pretty through job of verifying this statically.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: yelirekim, hach-que, epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T4100, T5595
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D12453
Summary:
Ref T5750. These are a pain to modernize and most don't matter, so cheat:
- Mark a bunch nonbrowsable, including some that probably should be browsable but which I don't want to deal with for now.
- For static datasources, add an easy server-side filter (this isn't really cheating, and is appropriate for the status/priority/application datasources).
- Make composite sources browsable if their components are browsable.
Test Plan:
- Tried to browse an unbrowsable source, got a 404.
- Browsed a composite source.
- Browsed static sources (priority/status/applications).
- Browsed normal sources (people/projects).
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T5750
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D12438
