Summary: Fixes T11198. These are confusing or premature if you aren't an activated user: disabled or unapproved accounts won't be able to act on them.
Test Plan: Changed timezone, went through flow to correct it
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T11198
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D16167
Summary:
Ref T11179. This splits "Edit Blocking Tasks" into two options now that we have more room ("Edit Parent Tasks", "Edit Subtasks").
This also renames "Blocking" tasks to "Subtasks", and "Blocked" tasks to "Parent" tasks. My goals here are:
- Make the relationship direction more clear: it's more clear which way is up with "parent" and "subtask" at a glance than with "blocking" and "blocked" or "dependent" and "dependency".
- Align language with "Create Subtask".
- To some small degree, use more flexible/general-purpose language, although I haven't seen any real confusion here.
Fixes T6815. I think I narrowed this down to two issues:
- Just throwing a bare exeception (we now return a dialog explicitly).
- Not killing open transactions when the cyclec check fails (we now kill them).
Test Plan:
- Edited parent tasks.
- Edited subtasks.
- Tried to introduce graph cycles, got a nice error dialog.
{F1697087}
{F1697088}
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T6815, T11179
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D16166
Summary:
Ref T11179. Ref T4768. Currently, on `master`, if two users open "Edit Revisions" at the same time, then add revisions A and B, only the last state wins (just "B").
Instead, apply these as "add A" and "add B" so they merge in a natural way.
Test Plan:
- Opened edit dialog in two windows.
- Added "A" in one, "B" in the other.
- Saved both.
- Saw "Added A" and "Added B" transactions, instead of "Added A" and "Removed A, added B".
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T4768, T11179
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D16164
Summary: Ref T11179. This is basically a "pro" controller to replace the SearchAttach controller. It does basically the same stuff, just in a (mostly) more modern and modular way.
Test Plan:
- Added and removed mocks.
- Added and removed revisions.
- Everything worked just like it did before.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T11179
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D16163
Summary:
Ref T11179. This generates the Maniphest menu items in a modular way. It doesn't change any of the underlying code yet.
Searching for commits doesn't work particularly well so I've just hidden that for now, but the item itself works fine.
Test Plan: {F1696849}
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T11179
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D16162
Summary: Fixes T11193. Assume this is the correct place to check for permissions before attaching edges.
Test Plan: Create a task and set edit policy to Admins, log into test account. Try to Edit Subtasks, Merge Duplicates, Attach a Diff, or Attach a Mock, get a Policy Dialog explaing why.
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: Korvin
Maniphest Tasks: T11193
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D16161
Summary: Fixes T11190. The div with all the stuff in it was sometimes ending up on top of the "select" button, making it unclickable.
Test Plan: Clicked "select" in several browsers.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T11190
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D16160
Summary: This makes it more natural to write Herald rules about commits that appear on any or no branches.
Test Plan: Wrote a commit rule for commits on any branch, ran it with `bin/repository reparse --herald <commit>`, saw expected results in web UI.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D16158
Summary: Just removing the animation for now, can't find anything decent, I think that the issue is the animation is applying to all items in the list, and not just as a list as a single block. That is, I'd like to slide down all three at one. Any animation that slides them down when attached to each item makes them overlap at the first frame and it's a little distracting. Not a big deal to leave this out for now. Whatever we come up with should likely be applied to phuix-dropdown as well.
Test Plan: Clicky Clicky.
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: Korvin
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D16159
Summary:
Ref T11179. Alternative to D16152. I think this turned out a bit better than the other one did.
Currently, we render two copies of the menu (one for mobile, one for desktop). A big chunk of this is sharing the nodes instead: when you open the mobile dropdown menu, it steals the nodes from the document. When you close it, it puts them back. Magic! Sneaky!
Test Plan:
{F1695499}
{F1695500}
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T11179
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D16157
Summary: Ref T11034. Ref T4788. This allows you to resize the typeahead browse dialog if you want. I plan to let you resize the object selector dialog in the future.
Test Plan: {F1695433}
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T4788, T11034
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D16156
Summary:
Ref T11034. This seems a little more promising. Two problems at the moment:
- This doesn't actually provide any useful information at all right now.
- Many object types have no profile images.
Test Plan:
{F1695254}
{F1695255}
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T11034
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D16155
Summary:
Ref T11179. One issue I'm getting with trying to turn actions into dropdowns is that we currently render this menu very late, which can cause us to try to add more metadata after we start resolving metadata. This won't work right now (and making it work seems unreasonably complicated), so stop doing it and fatal if something tries.
(This might make some things fatal but //should// be safe -- anything that fatals should have been broken already.)
Test Plan:
Browsed around looking for fatals, didn't see any.
(This primarily avoids a broken state / fatal in a future diff.)
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T11179
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D16151
Summary: Ref T9897. Adds a Parent Site and Parent Domain field to allow external sites to link back to parent.
Test Plan: Set up ```local.blog.phacility.com```, set parent site to "Phacility" and parent domain to "local.www.phacility.com". Get new crumbs at Blog and Post levels.
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: Korvin
Maniphest Tasks: T9897
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D16150
Summary:
Fixes T11180. In Git, it's possible to tag a tag (????). When you do, we try to log the tag-object, which automatically resolves to the commit and fails.
Just skip these. If "A" points at "B" which points at "C", it's fine to ignore "A" and "B" since we'll get the same stuff when we process "C".
Test Plan:
- Tagged a tag.
- Pushed it.
- Discovered it.
- Before patch: got exception similar to the one in T11180.
- After patch: got tag-tag skipped. Also got slightly better error messages.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T11180
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D16149
Summary: Reading the code, this seems correct, but I don't have a local test. Ref T9897
Test Plan: read carefully
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: Korvin
Maniphest Tasks: T9897
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D16148
Summary: Makes the crumbs background and border disappear in the live view of Phame.
Test Plan: Go live, see no crumb bg. Test blog, post, mobile, desktop.
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: Korvin
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D16146
Summary: Adds a new header layout for Phame Blog. Subtitles now also.
Test Plan:
With Image, With Subtitle, Without Image, Without Subtitle. Mobile, Tablet, Desktop.
{F1691506}
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: Korvin
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D16147
Summary:
Ref T11153. If you have a build plan like this:
- Lease machine A.
- Lease machine B.
- Run client-tests on machine A.
- Run server-tests on machine B.
...and we get machine A quickly, then finish the tests, we currently do not release machine A until the whole plan finishes.
In the best case, this wastes resources (something else could be using that machine for a while).
In a worse case, this wastes a lot of resources (if machine B is slow to acquire, or the server tests are much slower than the client tests, machine A will get tied up for a really long time).
In the absolute worst case, this might deadlock things.
Instead, release artifacts as soon as no waiting/running steps take them as inputs. In this case, we'd release machine A as soon as we finished running the client tests.
In the case where machines A and B are resources of the same type, this should prevent deadlocks. In all cases, this should improve build throughput at least somewhat.
Test Plan:
I wrote this build plan which runs a "fast" step (10 seconds) and a "slow" step (120 seconds):
{F1691190}
Before the patch, running this build plan held the lease on the "fast" machine for the full 120 seconds, then released both leases at the same time at the very end.
After this patch, I ran this plan and observed the "fast" lease get released after 10 seconds, while the "slow" lease was held for the full 120.
(Also added some `var_dump()` into things to sanity check the logic; it appeared correct.)
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T11153
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D16145
Summary: This should get locked to 100% of viewport.
Test Plan: Really wide image on a mobile screen.
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: Korvin
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D16144
Summary: Adds a view live and view internal link to the blog and crumbs manage page.
Test Plan: Click on new links.
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: Korvin
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D16142
Summary: Fixes T10901. Allows blogs to have headers. I've built this in a basic way, any file, max-height is 240. Should bleed into top crumbs, so any spacing you want you should add to the file itself. Might have to see how users break this.
Test Plan: Set a blog header, see blog header, remove blog header, see no blog header. Check mobile, tablet, desktop break points.
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: Korvin
Maniphest Tasks: T10901
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D16141
Summary: This is the backend half of uploading an image as a header for Phame Blogs. Allows you to upload image, or delete it. Ref T10901
Test Plan:
Go to Manage Blog, visit Edit Header Image, Upload snarky file. See snarky file on Manage page. Edit Header Image, click delete, save, see file goes away.
{F1690966}
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: Korvin
Maniphest Tasks: T10901
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D16140
Summary:
This test has been failing occasionally in a way that does not reproduce, and only when no one is looking at it.
Try to add some extra assertions to maybe get more information.
Test Plan: `arc unit`
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D16137
Summary: Ref T9028. When selecting refs, pretend refs in "refs/remotes/" that we don't otherwise recognize don't exist, since it looks like these are probably remotes //of the remote// we're observing, and who knows what state they're in.
Test Plan: Used `bin/repository discover --verbose` to verify that these named refs no longer appear in the list.
Reviewers: chad, joshuaspence
Reviewed By: joshuaspence
Maniphest Tasks: T9028
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D16136
Summary:
Ref T9028. Mostly, this gives them a strikethru style.
(I think this is probably the right definition of "closed" for commits. Another definition might be "audited", but I don't think completing audits really "closes" a commit.)
Test Plan: {F1689662}
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T9028
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D16135
Summary: Ref T9028. Ref T6878. This rule should probably be refined in the long term, but for now just ignore "phabricator/diff/12424" and similar staging area tags.
Test Plan: Ran `bin/repository discover --verbose` on a repository with staging area refs, saw Phabricator ignore those refs as untracked.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T6878, T9028
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D16134
Summary:
Ref T9028. This allows us to detect when commits are unreachable:
- When a ref (tag, branch, etc) is moved or deleted, store the old thing it pointed at in a list.
- After discovery, go through the list and check if all the stuff on it is still reachable.
- If something isn't, try to follow its ancestors back until we find something that is reachable.
- Then, mark everything we found as unreachable.
- Finally, rebuild the repository summary table to correct the commit count.
Test Plan:
- Deleted a ref, ran `pull` + `refs`, saw oldref in database.
- Ran `discover`, saw it process the oldref, mark the unreachable commit, and update the summary table.
- Visited commit page, saw it properly marked.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T9028
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D16133
Summary:
Ref T9028. This corrects the reachability of existing commits in a repository.
In particular, it can be used to mark deleted commits as unreachable.
Test Plan:
- Ran it on a bad repository, with bad args, etc.
- Ran it on a clean repo, got no changes.
- Marked a reachable commit as unreachable, ran script, got it marked reachable.
- Started deleting tags and branches from the local working copy while running the script, saw greater parts of the repository get marked unreachable.
- Pulled repository again, everything automatically revived.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T9028
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D16132
Summary:
Ref T9028. This improves the daemon behavior for unreachable commits. There is still no way for commits to become marked unreachable on their own.
- When a daemon encounters an unreachable commit, fail permanently.
- When we revive a commit, queue new daemons to process it (since some of the daemons might have failed permanently the first time around).
- Before doing a step on a commit, check if the step has already been done and skip it if it has. This can't happen normally, but will soon be possible if a commit is repeatedly deleted and revived very quickly.
- Steps queued with `bin/repository reparse ...` still execute normally.
Test Plan:
- Used `bin/repository reparse` to run every step, verified they all mark the commit with the proper flag.
- Faked the `reparse` exception in the "skip step" code, used `repository reparse` to skip every step.
- Marked a commit as unreachable, ran `discover`, saw daemons queue for it.
- Ran daemons with `bin/worker execute --id ...`, saw them all skip + queue the next step.
- Marked a commit as unreachable, ran `bin/repository reparse` on it, got permanent failures immediately for each step.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T9028
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D16131
Summary:
Ref T9028. This is the easy part of dealing with deleted commits:
- Add a flag for unreachable commits (nothing sets this flag yet).
- Ignore unreachable commits when querying for known commits during discovery, so we pretend they do not exist.
- When recording a commit, try just reviving an existing unreachable commit first. If that works, bail out.
Test Plan:
- Artificially marked a commit as unreachable with raw SQL.
- Verified it said "deleted: unreachable" in the UI.
- Ran `repository discover --trace --verbose`.
- Saw the discovery process ignore the commit when filling the cache.
- Saw the discovery process revive the commit instead of trying to record it again.
- Web UI now shows the commit as normal.
- Running `repository discover` again doesn't make any further changes.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T9028
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D16130
Summary:
Ref T9028. Fixes T6878. Currently, we only fetch and discover branches. This is fine 99% of the time but sometimes commits are pushed to just a tag, e.g.:
```
git checkout <some hash>
nano file.c
git commit -am '...'
git tag wild-wild-west
git push origin wild-wild-west
```
Through a similar process, commits can also be pushed to some arbitrary named ref (we do this for staging areas).
With the current rules, we don't fetch tag refs and won't discover these commits.
Change the rules so:
- we fetch all refs; and
- we discover ancestors of all refs.
Autoclose rules for tags and arbitrary refs are just hard-coded for now. We might make these more flexible in the future, or we might do forks instead, or maybe we'll have to do both.
Test Plan:
Pushed a commit to a tag ONLY (`vegetable1`).
<cf508b8de6>
On `master`, prior to the change:
- Used `update` + `refs` + `discover`.
- Verified tag was not fetched with `git for-each-ref` in local working copy and the web UI.
- Verified commit was not discovered using the web UI.
With this patch applied:
- Used `update`, saw a `refs/*` fetch instead of a `refs/heads/*` fetch.
- Used `git for-each-ref` to verify that tag fetched.
- Used `repository refs`.
- Saw new tag appear in the tags list in the web UI.
- Saw new refcursor appear in refcursor table.
- Used `repository discover --verbose` and examine refs for sanity.
- Saw commit row appear in database.
- Saw commit skeleton appear in web UI.
- Ran `bin/phd debug task`.
- Saw commit fully parse.
{F1689319}
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Subscribers: avivey
Maniphest Tasks: T6878, T9028
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D16129
Summary:
Ref T11140. This makes encryption actually work:
- Provide a new configuation option, `keyring`, for specifying encryption keys.
- One key may be marked as `default`. This activates AES256 encryption for Files.
- Add `bin/files generate-key`. This is helps when generating valid encryption keys.
- Add `bin/files encode`. This changes the storage encoding of a file, and helps test encodings and migrate existing data.
- Add `bin/files cycle`. This re-encodes the block key with a new master key, if your master key leaks or you're just paraonid.
- Document all these options and behaviors.
Test Plan:
- Configured a bad `keyring`, hit a bunch of different errors.
- Used `bin/files generate-key` to try to generate bad keys, got appropriate errors ("raw doesn't support keys", etc).
- Used `bin/files generate-key` to generate an AES256 key.
- Put the new AES256 key into the `keyring`, without `default`.
- Uploaded a new file, verified it still uploaded as raw data (no `default` key yet).
- Used `bin/files encode` to change a file to ROT13 and back to raw. Verified old data got deleted and new data got stored properly.
- Used `bin/files encode --key ...` to explicitly convert a file to AES256 with my non-default key.
- Forced a re-encode of an AES256 file, verified the old data was deleted and a new key and IV were generated.
- Used `bin/files cycle` to try to cycle raw/rot13 files, got errors.
- Used `bin/files cycle` to cycle AES256 files. Verified metadata changed but file data did not. Verified file data was still decryptable with metadata.
- Ran `bin/files cycle --all`.
- Ran `encode` and `cycle` on chunked files, saw commands fail properly. These commands operate on the underlying data blocks, not the chunk metadata.
- Set key to `default`, uploaded a file, saw it stored as AES256.
- Read documentation.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T11140
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D16127
Summary:
Ref T11140. This doesn't do anything yet since there's no way to enable it and no way to store master keys.
Those are slightly tougher problems and I'm not totally satisfied that I have an approach I really like for either problem, so I may wait for a bit before tackling them. Once they're solved, this does the mechanical encrypt/decrypt stuff, though.
This design is substantially similar to the AWS S3 server-side encryption design, and intended as an analog for it. The decisions AWS has made in design generally seem reasonable to me.
Each block of file data is encrypted with a unique key and a unique IV, and then that key and IV are encrypted with the master key (and a distinct, unique IV). This is better than just encrypting with the master key directly because:
- You can rotate the master key later and only need to re-encrypt a small amount of key data (about 48 bytes per file chunk), instead of re-encrypting all of the actual file data (up to 4MB per file chunk).
- Instead of putting the master key on every server, you can put it on some dedicated keyserver which accepts encrypted keys, decrypts them, and returns plaintext keys, and can send it 32-byte keys for decryption instead of 4MB blocks of file data.
- You have to compromise the master key, the database, AND the file store to get the file data. This is probably not much of a barrier realistically, but it does make attacks very slightly harder.
The "KeyRing" thing may change once I figure out how I want users to store master keys, but it was the simplest approach to get the unit tests working.
Test Plan:
- Ran unit tests.
- Dumped raw data, saw encrypted blob.
- No way to actually use this in the real application yet so it can't be tested too extensively.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T11140
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D16124
Summary: Fixes T11156. These were never correct, but also never actually used until I made timelines load object handles unconditionally in D16111.
Test Plan: Viewed an auth provider with transactions, no more fatal.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T11156
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D16128
Summary: Uses PHUITwoColumnView in Blog Manage and Blog Picture. Ref T9897
Test Plan: Use each page.
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: Korvin
Maniphest Tasks: T9897
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D16126
Summary: Adds some ordering options to PhamePost queries. Works on search, PhameHome, BlogHome
Test Plan: Try searching with Order By set to Date Published in application search, get correct order. Check a blog home page, check PhameHome.
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: Korvin
Maniphest Tasks: T9897
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D16125
Summary:
Ref T11140. When reading and writing files, we optionally apply a "storage format" to them.
The default format is "raw", which means we just store the raw data.
This change modularizes formats and adds a "rot13" format, which proves formatting works and is testable. In the future, I'll add real encryption formats.
Test Plan:
- Added unit tests.
- Viewed files in web UI.
- Changed a file's format to rot13, saw the data get rotated on display.
- Set default format to rot13:
- Uploaded a small file, verified data was stored as rot13.
- Uploaded a large file, verified metadata was stored as "raw" (just a type, no actual data) and blob data was stored as rot13.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T11140
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D16122
Summary: Ref T11142. H264 video in a Quicktime container works in Safari and Firefox for me (although not Chrome), so include it in the default video mime types.
Test Plan: Uploaded video file from T11142 locally, saw it render with `<video />` properly in Safari.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T11142
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D16121
Summary: Flips the bits from true to false in transaction editor.
Test Plan: update a post, search for new term
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: Korvin
Maniphest Tasks: T9897
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D16120
Summary: Ref T9897, makes blogs searchable
Test Plan: Make a blog, index it, search for it.
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: Korvin
Maniphest Tasks: T9897
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D16119
Summary:
Ref T11098. Mixture of issues here:
- Similar problem to D16112, where users with no settings at all could fail to fall back to the global defaults.
- I made `UserPreferencesQuery` responsible for building defaults instead to simplify this, since we have 4 or 5 callsites which need to do it and they aren't easily reducible.
- Handle cases where `metamta.one-mail-per-recipient` is off (and thus users can not have any custom settings) more explicitly.
- When `metamta.one-mail-per-recipient` is off, remove the "Email Format" panel for users only -- administrators can still access it in global preferences.
Test Plan:
- Deleted a user's preferences, changed globals, purged cache, made sure defaults reflected global defaults.
- Changed global mail tags, sent mail to the user, verified it was dropped in accordinace with global settings.
- Changed user's settings to get the mail instead, verified mail was sent.
- Toggled user's Re / Vary settings, verified mail subject lines reflected user settings.
- Disabled `metamta.one-mail-per-recipient`, verified user "Email Format" panel vanished.
- Edited "Email Format" in single-mail-mode in global prefs as an administrator.
- Sent more mail, verified mail respected new global settings.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T11098
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D16118
Summary: Ref T11098. There is no reason to maintain these as separate values now that they can be configured in global settings.
Test Plan:
- Hit and read setup issue.
- Fiddled with settings.
- I'll vet this more throughly in the next diff since I need to fix an issue with global defaults in mail and can explicitly test this at the same time.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Subscribers: eadler
Maniphest Tasks: T11098
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D16117
Summary: Adds PhamePost object to fulltextsearch index. Some issue searching just "Open" though? Also "closed" objects search fine but don't display as disabled.
Test Plan:
bin/search index --type POST
{F1687043}
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: Korvin
Maniphest Tasks: T9897
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D16116
Summary: Ref T9789. Falling back to `parent::` is better, and fixes older-style feed stories for Pastes, like "added a comment".
Test Plan: Viewed a comment feed story about a paste.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T9789
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D16114
Summary:
The option names for `Vary Subjects` are copypasta from the `Add "Re:" Prefix` option. Fix their names to refer to `Vary Subjects` instead.
Fixes T11148
Test Plan: Verify option names for `Vary Subjects` refer to `Add "Re:" Prefix` before apply. Verify they no longer do after apply.
Reviewers: #blessed_reviewers, epriestley
Reviewed By: #blessed_reviewers, epriestley
Subscribers: Korvin
Maniphest Tasks: T11148
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D16113
Summary:
Ref T9789. `Transaction` and `Editor` classes are the last major pieces of infrastructure that haven't been fully modularized.
Some of the specific issues are:
- `Editor` classes rely on a bunch of `instanceof` stuff in the base class to pick up transaction types like "subscribe", "projects", etc. Instead, applications should be adding these, and third-party applications should be able to add them.
- Code is spread across `Transaction` and `Editor` classes somewhat oddly. For example, generating old/new values would probably make more sense at the `Transaction` level, but it currently exists at the `Editor` level.
- Both types of classes have a lot of functions based on `switch()` statements, which require a ton of boilerplate and are just generally kind of hard to work with.
This creates classes for each type of transaction, and moves almost all of the logic to them. These classes are simpler and more focused than the old stuff was, and can organize related code better.
This starts inching toward defining `CoreTransactions` for features shared across applications. It only defines the "Create" transaction so far, but at some point I plan to move all the other shared transactions to Core and let them control which objects they're available for.
Test Plan:
- Created pastes with web UI and API.
- Edited all paste properites.
- Archived/activated.
- Verified files got reasonable names.
- Reviewed timeline and feed.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T9789
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D16111
Summary:
Ref T11098. Users with at least one setting set correctly fall back to the defaults, but users with no settings at all currently do not.
Make them fall back to global defaults properly.
Test Plan:
- Set global defaults to some non-default setting.
- Completely delete a user's settings.
- `bin/cache purge --purge-all` or `--purge-user`.
- View settings as the user.
- Before change: showed hard-coded defaults instead of global defaults until you save anything.
- After change: properly shows global defaults from the start.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T11098
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D16112
