Summary:
Ref T1536. Facebook currently does a check which should be on-login in registration hooks, and this is generally a reasonable hook to provide.
The "will login" event allows listeners to reject or modify a login, or just log it or whatever.
NOTE: This doesn't cover non-web logins right now -- notably Conduit. That's presumably fine.
(This can't land for a while, it depends on about 10 uncommitted revisions.)
Test Plan: Logged out and in again.
Reviewers: wez, btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T1536
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6202
Summary:
Currently, registration and authentication are pretty messy. Two concrete problems:
- The `PhabricatorLDAPRegistrationController` and `PhabricatorOAuthDefaultRegistrationController` controllers are giant copy/pastes of one another. This is really bad.
- We can't practically implement OpenID because we can't reissue the authentication request.
Additionally, the OAuth registration controller can be replaced wholesale by config, which is a huge API surface area and a giant mess.
Broadly, the problem right now is that registration does too much: we hand it some set of indirect credentials (like OAuth tokens) and expect it to take those the entire way to a registered user. Instead, break registration into smaller steps:
- User authenticates with remote service.
- Phabricator pulls information (remote account ID, username, email, real name, profile picture, etc) from the remote service and saves it as `PhabricatorUserCredentials`.
- Phabricator hands the `PhabricatorUserCredentials` to the registration form, which is agnostic about where they originate from: it can process LDAP credentials, OAuth credentials, plain old email credentials, HTTP basic auth credentials, etc.
This doesn't do anything yet -- there is no way to create credentials objects (and no storage patch), but I wanted to get any initial feedback, especially about the event call for T2394. In particular, I think the implementation would look something like this:
$profile = $event->getValue('profile')
$username = $profile->getDefaultUsername();
$is_employee = is_this_a_facebook_employee($username);
if (!$is_employee) {
throw new Exception("You are not employed at Facebook.");
}
$fbid = get_fbid_for_facebook_username($username);
$profile->setDefaultEmail($fbid);
$profile->setCanEditUsername(false);
$profile->setCanEditEmail(false);
$profile->setCanEditRealName(false);
$profile->setShouldVerifyEmail(true);
Seem reasonable?
Test Plan: N/A yet, probably fatals.
Reviewers: vrana, btrahan, codeblock, chad
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran, asherkin, nh, wez
Maniphest Tasks: T1536, T2394
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D4647
Summary: Ref T1536. This is similar to D6172 but much simpler: we don't need to retain external interfaces here and can do a straight migration.
Test Plan: TBA
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T1536
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6173
Summary: Ref T1536. Migrates the OAuthInfo table to ExternalAccount, and makes `PhabricatorUserOAuthInfo` a wrapper for an ExternalAccount.
Test Plan: Logged in with OAuth, registered with OAuth, linked/unlinked OAuth accounts, checked OAuth status screen, deleted an account with related OAuth.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T1536
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6172
Summary:
Ref T1536. This is the schema code for `PhabricatorExternalAccount` which was previously in D4647. I'm splitting it out so I can put it earlier in the sequence and because it's simple and standalone.
Expands `PhabricatorExternalAccount` to have everything we need for the rest of registration.
Test Plan: Implemented the remainder of new registration on top of this.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T1536
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6169
Summary: Decided to just remove the hover grey to white, seems fine with the new white icons.
Test Plan: use homepage + icons
Reviewers: epriestley, btrahan
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: aran, Korvin
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6181
Summary: Took a stab at some login icons for buttons.
Test Plan: photoshop
Reviewers: epriestley, btrahan
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: aran, Korvin
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6174
Summary:
Ref T1703. This sets the stage for (but does not yet implement) custom UI types for config. In particular, a draggable list for custom fields.
I might make all the builtin types go through this at some point too, but don't really want to bother for the moment. It would be very slightly cleaner but woudn't get us much of anything.
Test Plan:
UI now renders via custom code, although that code does nothing (produces an unadorned text field):
{F45693}
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T1703
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6154
Summary:
Adds a profile edit controller (with just one field and on links to it) that uses ApplicationTransactions and CustomField.
{F45617}
My plan is to move the other profile fields to this interface and get rid of Settings -> Profile. Basically, these will be "settings":
- Sex
- Language
- Timezone
These will be "profile":
- Real Name
- Title
- Blurb
- Profile Image (but I'm going to put this on a separate UI)
- Other custom fields
Test Plan: Edited my realname using the new interface.
Reviewers: chad, seporaitis
Reviewed By: chad
CC: aran
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6152
Summary:
None of this code is reachable yet. See discussion in D6147. Ref T1703.
Provide tighter integration between ApplicationTransactions and CustomField. Basically, I'm just trying to get all the shared stuff into the base implementation.
Test Plan: Code not reachable.
Reviewers: chad, seporaitis
Reviewed By: chad
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T1703
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6149
Summary:
Ref T1703. We have currently have two custom field implementations (Maniphest, Differential) and are about to add a third (User, see D6122). I'd like to generalize custom fields before doing a third implementation, so we don't back ourselves into the ApplicationTransactions corner we have with Maniphest/Differential/Audit.
For the most part, the existing custom fields work well and can be directly generalized. There are three specific things I want to improve, though:
- Integration with ApplicationSearch: Custom fields aren't indexable. ApplicationSearch is now online and seems stable and good. D5278 provides a template for a backend which can integrate with ApplicationSearch, and ApplicationSearch solves many of the other UI problems implied by exposing custom fields into search (principally, giant pages full of query fields). Generally, I want to provide stronger builtin integration between custom fields and ApplicationSearch.
- Integration with ApplicationTransactions: Likewise, custom fields should support more native integrations with ApplicationTransactions, which are also online and seem stable and well designed.
- Selection and sorting: Selecting and sorting custom fields is a huge mess right now. I want to move this into config now that we have the UI to support it, and move away from requiring users to subclass a ton of stuff just to add a field.
For ApplicationSearch, I've adopted and generalized D5278.
For ApplicationTransactions, I haven't made any specific affordances yet.
For selection and sorting, I've partially implemented config-based selection and sorting. It will work like this:
- We add a new configuration value, like `differential.fields`. In the UI, this is a draggable list of supported fields. Fields can be reordered, and most fields can be disabled.
- We load every avialable field to populate this list. New fields will appear at the bottom.
- There are two downsides to this approach:
- If we add fields in the upstream at a later date, they will appear at the end of the list if an install has customized list order or disabled fields, even if we insert them elsewhere in the upstream.
- If we reorder fields in the upstream, the reordering will not be reflected in install which have customized the order/availability.
- I think these are both acceptable costs. We only incur them if an admin edits this config, which implies they'll know how to fix it if they want to.
- We can fix both of these problems with a straightforward configuration migration if we want to bother.
- There are numerous upsides to this approach:
- We can delete a bunch of code and replace it with simple configuration.
- In general, we don't need the "selector" classes anymore.
- Users can enable available-but-disabled fields with one click.
- Users can add fields by putting their implementations in `src/extensions/` with zero subclassing or libphutil stuff.
- Generally, it's super easy for users to understand.
This doesn't actually do anything yet and will probably see some adjustments before anything starts running it.
Test Plan: Static checks only, this code isn't reachable yet.
Reviewers: chad, seporaitis
Reviewed By: chad
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T1703
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6147
Summary: Gets TOC populated for articles, at least, and fixes a few other things.
Test Plan: {F45474}
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
CC: aran
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6144
Summary: Needed to be more restrictive
Test Plan: Test maniphest and list examples.
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: aran, Korvin
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6139
Summary: This adds examples and abstracts out CSS for common nav re-use.
Test Plan: Tested DocumentExample and ListExample
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: aran, Korvin
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6138
Summary:
This diff covers a bit of ground.
- PHUIDocumentExample has been added
- PHUIDocument has been extended with new features
- PhabricatorMenuView is now PHUIListView
- PhabricatorMenuItemView is now PHUIItemListView
Overall - I think I've gotten all the edges covered here. There is some derpi-ness that we can talk about, comments in the code. Responsive design is missing from the new features on PHUIDocument, will follow up later.
Test Plan: Tested mobile and desktop menus, old phriction layout, new document views, new lists, and object lists.
Reviewers: epriestley, btrahan
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: aran, Korvin
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6130
Summary:
Applications come with builtin queries, but users might want to get rid of them. Allow users to disable named queries if they prefer.
This has one funky behavior, which is that the first time you disable a named query it goes to the top of your list. That will be fixed in the next diff, which will make them reorderable.
Test Plan: Added/edited/removed named queries, disabled/enabled builtin named queries.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
CC: aran
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6128
Summary: Ref T988. Mostly backend changes, with a very rough frontend on top of them. See Conpherence discussion.
Test Plan: {F45010}
Reviewers: btrahan, chad
Reviewed By: chad
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T988
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6113
Summary: See D6115.
Test Plan:
- Ran unit tests.
- Viewed reports.
- Created a countdown.
- Searched chatlog.
- Searched pastes by created date.
Reviewers: btrahan, chad
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6116
Summary: Ref T2625. Ref T1163. A couple of small generalization nudges, but this is almost entirely straightforward.
Test Plan: Executed various File queries.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T1163, T2625
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6091
Summary:
Ref T2625. Ref T3273. This is mostly a UI foil for T3273. Right now, to find tasks without owners or without projects you search for the magic strings "upforgrabs" and "noproject". Unsurprisingly, no users have ever figured this out. I want to get rid of it. Instead, these interfaces will look like:
Assigned: [ Type a user name... ]
[ X ] Find unassigned tasks.
Projects: [ Type a project name... ]
[ X ] Find tasks with no projects.
Seems reasonable, I think?
Test Plan: Searched for "rainbow, js", "rainbow + no language", "no language", date ranges, etc.
Reviewers: chad, btrahan
Reviewed By: chad
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T2625, T3273
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6085
Summary:
Ref T1163. Ref T2625. This could probably use some tweaks, but I kept things mostly-generic.
I added a new control for freeform dates so we can have it render help or whatever later on.
Test Plan: See screenshots.
Reviewers: chad, btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T2625, T1163
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6084
Summary:
This prevents security by obscurity.
If I have read-only access to the database then I can pretend to be any logged-in user.
I've used `PhabricatorHash::digest()` (even though we don't need salt as the hashed string is random) to be compatible with user log.
Test Plan:
Applied patch.
Verified I'm still logged in.
Logged out.
Logged in.
$ arc tasks
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: aran, Korvin
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6080
Summary:
Currently, the author of an image macro is read from the attached file. This is messy and necessitates a join, and is not always correct. Instead, store the data when the macro is created.
This lays the groundwork for generalizing ApplicationSearch here. Ref T2625.
Test Plan: Migrated existing macros, created a new macro, checked web UI.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T2625
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6071
Summary:
Kind of a quick look at an idea for T2184
Ref T2184
Test Plan: Make sure the site still loads
Reviewers: epriestley
CC: aran, Korvin, mbishopim3
Maniphest Tasks: T2184
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6045
Summary: I want to use some of these for instructional text in Diffusion. Provide a concrete class to make one-offs cacheable and switch Releeph to use it.
Test Plan: {F44175}
Reviewers: btrahan, chad, edward
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6032
Summary:
Ref T2231, T603. Plan of attack here is pretty much:
- Built out a new (currently not linked in the UI) edit interface in Diffusion which is transaction-based and has a sensible layout.
- Build out a new create interface based on PagedForm which dumps into the new edit interface.
- Throw the old stuff away.
- Everyone lives happily ever after.
Test Plan:
{F44163}
{F44164}
Reviewers: chad, btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T2231
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6029
Summary: Added constants to PhabricatorEventType. Modified DifferentialRevisionEditor and DifferentialCommentEditor.
Test Plan:
Created a revision. Edited and made a comment on that revision. It's updating as usual. I think nothing broke may be it's working.
Let me know if I have done it correclty.
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: aran, Korvin, AnhNhan
Maniphest Tasks: T2899
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D5869
Summary: If we're unassigning an owner from a task it should set the column to `NULL` rather than an empty string. Fixes T3239
Test Plan: Assigned and Unassigned a task. Make sure the db is doing as excpected. Ran the patch, checked the db.
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: aran, Korvin
Maniphest Tasks: T3239
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6017
Summary:
removes the whole custom image thing, instead using a more standard application crumbs. Gives this glorious space back to the compose area which is now tens of pixels taller. Also defaults it to the people widget. Basically, fixes T3160.
For now, you **CAN NOT** edit the title of a conpherence. I didn't want to jam in too much here. Next diff will be to change the widget icons into the dropdown switcher, which will also bring back the editing of titles.
Test Plan: looked at conpherence and it was pretty. Resized it vigorously and it wasn't too bad.
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: chad, aran, Korvin
Maniphest Tasks: T3160
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D5998
Summary:
Following on from D5938, also need to override the beta setting
so that testApplicationsInstalled passes
Test Plan: testApplicationsInstalled passes
Reviewers: epriestley, nh
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: aran, Korvin
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6001
Summary: My `\w` shenanigans don't work with Diffusion, which has no explicit prefix.
Test Plan: Typed `rXnnn` and got the whole thing properly marked up.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D5984
Summary:
Ref T988. This adds basics for the non-static publishing target:
- Storage (called "Live", e.g. `DivinerLiveAtom` to distinguish it from shared classes like `DivinerAtom`).
- Mostly populate the storage.
- Some minor fixes and improvements.
Test Plan: Generated docs, looked at DB, saw mostly-sensible output.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T988
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D5973
Summary: Fixes failure in "testApplicationInstalled" if this flag is off (as it is by default).
Test Plan: Ran "testApplicationsInstalled" with this flag off.
Reviewers: garoevans, btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D5979
Summary: If `jsxmin` is not available, use a pure PHP implementation instead (JsShrink).
Test Plan:
- Ran `arc lint --lintall` on all JS and fixed every relevant warning.
- Forced minification on and browsed around the site using JS behaviors. Didn't hit anything problematic.
Reviewers: vrana, btrahan
Reviewed By: vrana
CC: aran, Korvin
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D5670
Summary:
Ref T3190. #shipit
Likely future work:
- Extract project mentions from remarkup for ApplicationTransactions; this isn't relevant in any apps right now (but will be in Pholio before tooo long). Ref T3189.
- Allow projects to have alternate short names. As written, this is fine for most projects ("Differential" is `#differential`) but not so great for other projects ("Phabricator Public & Media Relations" is `#phabricator_public_media_relations`). This also breaks refs when you rename a project. Better would be letting long project names have short aliases (`#pr`) as permitted alternatives.
Since this mention uses `#` instead of a letter, I needed to do a small amount of regexp gymnastics.
Test Plan:
you only #yolo once
{F43615}
Reviewers: btrahan, chad
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T3189, T3190
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D5954
Summary: Debating removing the textures from the sidenavs, sending this around for comments.
Test Plan: Test homepage and various sidenavs, mobile layouts.
Reviewers: epriestley, btrahan
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: aran, Korvin
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D5948
Summary:
Normalize the unit test environment by installing all applications.
The immediate issue this fixes is that `testDropUnknownSenderMail` depends on Maniphest being installed. Some possible fixes are:
# Don't rely on the Maniphest mail receiver for the test (e.g., write a stub/dummy/mock receiver).
# Explicitly make sure Maniphest is installed before running the test.
# Normalize the test environment to install all applications.
I don't like (1) much because it turns a pretty good 10 line test into a bunch of stub classes or mock junk. I'll do it if we have more uses after a few more diffs, but so far running these tests against real code hasn't created a dependency mess and we get more coverage.
I don't like (2) much because I think requiring tests to do this will do more harm than good. The number of issues we'll hypothetically uncover by exposing unrealized application interdependencies is probably very small or maybe zero, and they're probably all trivial. But tests with an undeclared but implicit dependency on an application (e.g., Differential tests depend on Differential) are common.
So here's (3), which I think is reasonable.
I also simplified some of this code a little bit, and moved the Application object cache one level down (this was sort of a bug -- installation status is variant across requests).
Test Plan: Added unit test.
Reviewers: wez, btrahan
Reviewed By: wez
CC: aran
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D5938
Summary:
We/I broke a couple of things here recently (see D5911) and are doing some work here in general (see D5912, etc.).
Generally, this code is pretty oldschool and not especially well architected for modern application-oriented Phabricator. It hardcodes a lot of stuff which should be applications' responsibilites.
Take the first steps toward making it more solid to reduce the risk here. In particular:
- Factor out the "self mail" and "duplicate mail" checks and add unit tests.
- Make Message-ID hash handling automatic.
Test Plan: Ran unit tests.
Reviewers: btrahan, chad
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D5915
Summary:
Migrate to `PhabricatorApplicationTransactions` (`ReleephRequestTransactions` applied by `ReleephRequestTransactionalEditor`, instead of `ReleephRequestEvents` created by `ReleephRequestEditor`) and migrate all the old events into transactions. Email is supported in the standard way (no more `ReleephRequestMail`) as well.
This also collapses the Releeph request create and edit controllers into one class, as well as breaking everyone's subject-based mail rules by standardising them (but which should be more easily filtered by looking at headers.)
Test Plan:
* Make requests, then pick them.
* Pick and revert the same request so that discovery happens way after `arc` has told Releeph about what's been happening.
* Try to pick something that fails to pick in a project with pick instructions (and see the instructions are in the email.)
* Load all of FB's Releeph data into my DB and run the `storage upgrade` script.
* Request a commit via the "action" in a Differential revision.
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: epriestley, aran, Korvin, wez
Maniphest Tasks: T3092, T2720
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D5868
Summary: Can name saved queries.
Test Plan: Try naming some saved queries using the form.
Reviewers: epriestley
CC: aran, Korvin, AnhNhan
Maniphest Tasks: T2625
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D5878
Conflicts:
src/infrastructure/storage/patch/PhabricatorBuiltinPatchList.php
Summary:
We have a few interfaces where add "Edit", "Delete" or some other action to a list. Currently, this happens via icons, but these are cumbersome and weird, are inconsistent, can't be workflow'd, are hard to hit on desktops and virtually impossible to hit on mobile, and generally just feel iffy to me. Prominent examples are Projects and Flags. I'd like to try adding an "edit" action to Maniphest (to provide quick edit from list views, basically). It looks like some of Releeph would benefit here, as well.
Instead, provide first-class actions:
{F42978}
They produce targets which my meaty ham-fists can plausibly hit on mobile, too:
{F42979}
(We could do some kind of swipe-to-expose thing eventually, but I think putting them by default is OK?)
Test Plan: Added UIExamples. Checked desktop/mobile.
Reviewers: chad, btrahan, edward
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D5890
Summary: See D5874. PhutilDeferredLog's exception on `write()`/`__destruct()` is not especially important and can come at an awkward time. Instead of throwing, just emit an error message to the log.
Test Plan: Faked failed writes and saw an error message in the log instead of many terrible things everywhere.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T3144
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D5875
Summary: Adding mail-keys; required for `PhabricatorApplicationTransaction` support.
Test Plan: Upgrade an old database with this patch, observe the matrix: {F42620}
Reviewers: wez, epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: epriestley, aran
Maniphest Tasks: T2720
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D5852
Summary:
Removing a bunch of cache-style columns from `ReleephRequest`, where it's actually much easier to just load the information at runtime.
This makes sense for migrating to `PhabricatorApplicationTransactions`, where each xaction changes one aspect of a `ReleephRequest` at a time (rather than multiple columns at once.)
Test Plan: Request something, run `arc releeph` and watch the picks, pass on some RQs, run `arc releeph` and watch the reverts.
Reviewers: wez, epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: epriestley, aran
Maniphest Tasks: T2720
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D5851
Summary:
countdown_timer table named to countdown.
datepoint and related stuff renamed to epoch.
Countdowns now have phids.
Various UI items changed from timer to countdown.
Test Plan: Did run storage upgrade and added some countdowns.
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: aran, Korvin, AnhNhan
Maniphest Tasks: T2624
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D5812
Summary: Enable saved query objects to actually be saved to the database.
Test Plan: Insert a call to save() and check that the query is written correctly.
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: aran, Korvin, AnhNhan
Maniphest Tasks: T2625
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D5775
Conflicts:
src/infrastructure/storage/patch/PhabricatorBuiltinPatchList.php
Summary: this is D5750 but just the conpherence part. fixes a few random conpherence bugs / quirks as well. Also messes with ApplicationTransactionEditor to expose the xactions so Conpherence doesn't over-update participation rows. Fixes T2429.
Test Plan: set LIMIT to 3. verified I could scroll down all conpherences. next, picked a conpherence "in the middle" to load. verified I could page up and down. next, picked a conpherence in the middle then had another user update that conpherence. verified as I paged up the conpherence re-loaded properly selected
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: chad, aran, Korvin, vrana
Maniphest Tasks: T2429
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D5783
