1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://we.phorge.it/source/phorge.git synced 2024-11-25 16:22:43 +01:00
Commit graph

4 commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
vrana
6cc196a2e5 Move files in Phabricator one level up
Summary:
- `kill_init.php` said "Moving 1000 files" - I hope that this is not some limit in `FileFinder`.
- [src/infrastructure/celerity] `git mv utils.php map.php; git mv api/utils.php api.php`
- Comment `phutil_libraries` in `.arcconfig` and run `arc liberate`.

NOTE: `arc diff` timed out so I'm pushing it without review.

Test Plan:
/D1234
Browsed around, especially in `applications/repository/worker/commitchangeparser` and `applications/` in general.

Auditors: epriestley

Maniphest Tasks: T1103
2012-06-01 12:32:44 -07:00
epriestley
c458768415 Fix various threading issues, particularly in Gmail
Summary:
  - Add an explicit multiplexing option, and enable it by default. This is necessary for Mail.app to coexist with other clients ("Re:" breaks outlook at the very least, and generally sucks in the common case), and allows users with flexible clients to enable subject variance.
  - Add an option for subject line variance. Default to not varying the subject, so mail no longer says [Committed], [Closed], etc. This is so the defaults thread correctly in Gmail (not entirely sure this actually works).
  - Add a preference to enable subject line variance.
  - Unless all mail is multiplexed, don't enable or respect the "Re" or "vary subject" preferences. These are currently shown and respected in non-multiplex cases, which creates inconsistent results.

NOTE: @jungejason @nh @vrana This changes the default behavior (from non-multiplexing to multiplexing), and might break Facebook's integration. You should be able to keep the same behavior by setting the options appropriately, although if you can get the new defaults working they're probably better.

Test Plan:
Send mail from Maniphest, Differential and Audit. Updated preferences. Enabled/disabled multiplexing. Things seem OK?

NOTE: I haven't actually been able to repro the Gmail threading issue so I'm not totally sure what's going on there, maybe it started respecting "Re:" (or always has), but @cpiro and @20after4 both reported it independently. This fixes a bunch of bugs in any case and gives us more conservative set of defaults.

I'll see if I can buff out the Gmail story a bit but every client is basically a giant black box of mystery. :/

Reviewers: btrahan, vrana, jungejason, nh

Reviewed By: btrahan

CC: cpiro, 20after4, aran

Maniphest Tasks: T1097, T847

Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D2206
2012-04-12 09:31:03 -07:00
epriestley
11cccb98c2 Add "final" to more classes
Summary: No big surprises here, delted the unused "DarkConsole" class.

Test Plan: Ran 'testEverythingImplemented' to verify I wasn't finalizing anything we extend.

Reviewers: btrahan

Reviewed By: btrahan

CC: aran, epriestley

Maniphest Tasks: T795

Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D1876
2012-03-13 11:18:11 -07:00
jungejason
162f34b8c8 Add reply handler for differential revision
Summary:
add email reply handler so that the user can reply to a
differential email to act on the revision. It generates the reply-to
email address, creates email body text with supported commands list, and
handle the action request on the differential revision.

Right now the reply-to handing is disabled in the config file. But a
site using Phabricator can enable it and implement a class
inheriting from DifferentialReplyHandler to enable customized email
handing.

Later we will need to add code to DifferentialMail.php to support
sending separate email to each email recipient to achieve better
security (see D226). The reply-to will be something like
D<revision_id>+<user_id>+<hash>@domain.com. We will create separate task
for it.

Test Plan:
tried comment on a revision from web UI and the email was
sent out as before without any change. When a subclass of
DifferentialReplyHandler is implemented and enabled, email's reply-to is
set and email text is added. Reply to the email with valid command did
create action to the revision.

Reviewed By: epriestley
Reviewers: tuomaspelkonen, epriestley, slawekbiel, dpepper
CC: aran, epriestley, jungejason
Differential Revision: 224
2011-05-08 17:08:47 -07:00