1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://we.phorge.it/source/phorge.git synced 2024-11-16 11:52:40 +01:00
Commit graph

5 commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
epriestley
70ddb1c45f Allow packages to be added as revision reviewers via the UI
Summary:
Ref T10939. This lets you add packages as reviewers manually.

"Project Reviewers" now lists both projects and packages. I have renamed this to "Coalition Reviewers" but that's probably horrible and confusing. I'm not sure "Group Reviewers" is much better.

Test Plan:
  - Added a package as a reviewer manually.
  - Joined it, got authority over it.
  - Saw the review on my dashboard.
  - Accepted the revision, got authority extended to the package review.

{F1311652}

{F1311653}

Reviewers: chad

Reviewed By: chad

Maniphest Tasks: T10939

Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15914
2016-05-13 17:20:09 -07:00
Joshua Spence
36e2d02d6e phtize all the things
Summary: `pht`ize a whole bunch of strings in rP.

Test Plan: Intense eyeballing.

Reviewers: #blessed_reviewers, epriestley

Reviewed By: #blessed_reviewers, epriestley

Subscribers: hach-que, Korvin, epriestley

Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D12797
2015-05-22 21:16:39 +10:00
epriestley
6dd191a3c1 Allow configuration of Differential custom fields
Summary: Ref T2222. Ref T3886. This is a little early for general use, but the message parse/generate stuff requires CustomFields and FieldSpecifications to be closely aligned, so this provides at least a plausbile approach for any installs that run into trouble.

Test Plan: Viewed config; reordered fields.

Reviewers: btrahan

Reviewed By: btrahan

CC: aran

Maniphest Tasks: T2222, T3886

Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D8450
2014-03-11 13:01:57 -07:00
epriestley
ae3c1f7819 Perform commit message parsing and construction with new CustomFields
Summary: Ref T2222. Ref T3886. Converts parsing and construction of commit messages to be driven by CustomField.

Test Plan:
This is a huge, messy change. I've made an effort to test it exhasutively, but suspect I probably missed a few behaviors. Roughly:

  - Enumerted all current fields (fields implementing `shouldAppearOnCommitMessage()`) and tried to test them one by one.
  - Used `arc diff --edit` repeatedly to manipulate each field (this workflow hits both the parse and construct steps).
  - Used `arc amend --show` to examine construct output (this does not activate the "edit" mode).

Reviewers: btrahan

Reviewed By: btrahan

CC: aran

Maniphest Tasks: T3886, T2222

Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D8449
2014-03-11 13:01:55 -07:00
epriestley
ee2b6eebaa Implement detail views for many Differential fields on ApplicationTransactions
Summary:
Ref T2222. This isn't complete and doesn't change runtime behavior yet (the new fields are not glued to the interface), but implements many fields.

(The remaining fields have something weird going on with them, for the most part.)

Test Plan:
With additional changes, rendered most fields sensibly:

{F118834}

Reviewers: btrahan

Reviewed By: btrahan

CC: aran

Maniphest Tasks: T2222

Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D8354
2014-02-26 14:46:18 -08:00