Summary:
`strlen()` was used in Phabricator to check if a generic value is a non-empty string.
This behavior is deprecated since PHP 8.1. Phorge adopts `phutil_nonempty_string()` as a replacement.
Note: this may highlight other absurd input values that might be worth correcting
instead of just ignoring. If phutil_nonempty_string() throws an exception in your
instance, report it to Phorge to evaluate and fix that specific corner case.
```
EXCEPTION: (RuntimeException) strlen(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated at [<arcanist>/src/error/PhutilErrorHandler.php:261]
arcanist(head=master, ref.master=18554ea76ceb), phorge(head=diffDiff, ref.master=e11c5486c92b, ref.diffDiff=e11c5486c92b)
#0 <#2> PhutilErrorHandler::handleError(integer, string, string, integer) called at [<phorge>/src/infrastructure/diff/view/PHUIDiffTableOfContentsItemView.php:160]
```
Closes T15430
Test Plan:
After applying these two changes, going to `/differential/diff/create/`, pasting the content of a diff file into the "Raw Diff" field, and selecting the "Create Diff" button, `/differential/diff/1/` rendered correctly in web browser.
Also, install xdebug and try again with coverage mode enabled in your php.ini of your PHP cli.
Reviewers: O1 Blessed Committers, valerio.bozzolan
Reviewed By: O1 Blessed Committers, valerio.bozzolan
Subscribers: speck, tobiaswiese, valerio.bozzolan, Matthew, Cigaryno
Maniphest Tasks: T15430
Differential Revision: https://we.phorge.it/D25262
Summary:
Ref T13667. When a revision's diff has no changesets (usually because Diffusion performed an automatic update with an empty commit), the UI currently tries to "min()" an empty array and fatals.
Handle this case properly.
Test Plan:
- Created a revision with a diff with no changesets ("git commit --allow-empty" + copy-paste into web UI).
- Viewed revision.
- Before: "min()" fatal.
- After: UI isn't perfect, but works without fataling.
Subscribers: cspeckmim
Maniphest Tasks: T13667
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D21760
Summary: Ref T13559. Substantially correct the client logic for "Save" and "Cancel" actions to handle unusual cases.
Test Plan:
Quoting behavior:
- Quoted a comment.
- Cancelled the quoted comment without modifying anything.
- Reloaded page.
- Before changes: quoted comment still exists.
- After changes: quoted comment is deleted.
- Looked at comment count in header, saw consistent behavior (before: weird behavior).
Empty suggestion behavior:
- Created a new comment on a suggestable file.
- Clicked "Suggest Edit" to enable suggestions.
- Without making any text or suggestion changes, clicked "Save".
- Before changes: comment saves, but is empty.
- After changes: comment deletes itself without undo.
General behavior:
- Created and saved an empty comment (deletes itself).
- Created and saved a nonempty comment (saves as draft).
- Created and saved an empty comment with an edit suggestion (saves).
- Created and saved an empty comment with a suggestion to entirely delete lines -- that is, no suggestion text (saves).
- Edited a comment, saved without changes (save).
- Edited a comment, save deleting all text (saves -- note that this is intentionally without undo, since this is a lot of steps to do by accident).
- Cancel editing an unchanged comment (cancels without undo).
- Cancel editing a changed comment (cancels with undo).
- Undo'd, got text back.
- Cancel new comment with no text (deletes without undo).
- Cancel new comment with text (deletes with undo).
- Undo'd, got text back.
- Saved a quoted comment with no changes (saves -- note that this is intentionally not a "delete", since just quoting someone seems fine if you click "Save" -- maybe you want to come back to it later).
Maniphest Tasks: T13559
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D21654
Summary:
Ref T13559. Various client decisions depend on the "initial" or "committed" states of inline comments. Previously, these were informally constructed from "mostly similar" available values, or glossed over in some cases.
On the server, save the initial state when creating a comment. Save the committed state when applying a "save" operation. Send all three states to the client.
On the client, load and track all three states explicitly.
Test Plan: Created inlines, etc. See followups.
Maniphest Tasks: T13559
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D21653
Summary:
Ref T13559. Currently, the default text for inline comment side-loads in a bizarre way. Instead, when a user creates an inline comment, load the inline context and set it as part of the initial content state.
This allows the side channel (and the code that puts the text in place at the last second on the client) to be removed.
Test Plan: Created inlines, clicked "Suggest Edit". See followup changes.
Maniphest Tasks: T13559
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D21652
Summary:
Ref T13559. If you create comments A and B, then delete comments A and B, then undo the deletion of A, the UI undoes the deletion of B instead.
This is becasue the undo rows are shipped down with a static scalar metadata reference. When copied multiple times to create multiple undo rows, they reference the same data object.
Preventing this in the general case is a problem with greater scope. For now, just avoid rendering these rows with any metadata so they don't alias a single data object.
Test Plan:
- Created comments A, B.
- Deleted comments A, B.
- Clicked "Undo" on A.
- Before: Deletion of "B" undone.
- After: Deletion of "A" undone.
Maniphest Tasks: T13559
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D21650
Summary:
Ref T13559. When the user clicks the "Cancel" button, we sometimes take it to mean "delete" (when the comment is empty).
Both the client and server make a decision about this, and they may not agree, which causes the client to fall out of sync.
Make the client responsible for deciding whether it wants to interpret a click on the "Cancel" button as a "revert" or a "delete".
Test Plan: Cancelled empty and nonempty comments, etc. See followup changes.
Maniphest Tasks: T13559
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D21649
Summary:
Ref T13559. When you click "Save" on an inline comment and it's empty, we may actually delete the comment.
Currently, the client and server both make decisions about whether the comment should be deleted. These decisions may not agree, causing the client state to fall out of sync.
Make the client authoritative about whether it wants to handle the user clicking the "Save" button as an intent to save or an intent to delete.
Test Plan: Saved empty and nonempty inlines. See followup changes.
Maniphest Tasks: T13559
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D21648
Summary:
See PHI1876. Normally, deleted inlines are undeleted with an "undelete" operation, which clears the "isDeleted" flag.
However, when an inline is deleted implicitly by using "Cancel" without first saving it, the flag currently isn't cleared properly. This can lead to cases where inlines seem to vanish (they are shown to the user in the UI, but treated as deleted on submission).
Test Plan:
There are two affected sequences here:
- Create a new inline, type text, cancel, undo.
- Create a new inline, type text, cancel, undo, save.
The former sequence triggers an "edit" operation. The subsequent "Save" in the second sequence triggers a "save" operation.
It's normally impossible in the UI to execute a "save" without executing an "edit" first, but "save" clearly should undelete the comment if you get there somehow, so this change clears the deleted flag in both cases for completeness.
- Executed both sequences, saw comment persist in preview, on reload, and after submission.
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D21483
Summary:
See PHI1900. Recent changes to how commit graphs are drawn made the height automatic in most cases, but it fails in Differential because the element isn't initially visible so the computed height is 0.
Just give them an explicit height so they show up again.
Test Plan: Viewed graphs in Maniphest, Differential, and Diffusion; saw them all render properly.
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D21481
Summary:
See PHI1896. If you do this:
- Create an inline comment over a wide range of lines.
- Suggest an edit.
- Make a change near the beginning of the block.
- Make a change near the end of the block.
- Save the inline.
...you get a rendering which includes a "Show More Context" fold in the middle.
Currently, this element renders in a visually broken way and consumes too many columns.
However, this element isn't ever desirable inside inline comment suggestions. Stop it from rendering entirely.
Test Plan:
- Made an inline comment suggestion across lines 1-50 with edits at the beginning and end, saw a contiguous diff.
- Made smaller inline comment suggestions (one line, a few lines).
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D21476
Summary: Ref T13552. In the new combined "table/list" graph view, tidy up the graph rendering.
Test Plan: {F7633504}
Maniphest Tasks: T13552
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D21411
Summary:
See PHI1834. It's not obvious why this "+1" is present in the code, but it causes inlines to be adjusted incorrectly when a file is not modified across changes. See D21435.
Remove it, which appears to produce accurate adjustment behavior.
Test Plan:
- See D21435 for instructions to build a change, where a file with lines "A-Z" is unmodified across Diff 1 and Diff 2.
- Left inlines on lines 14, 17-19, and 16-26 (end of the file) on Diff 1.
- Before: saw inlines incorrectly adjusted to lines 15, 18, and 17 on Diff 2. Before D21435, the last inline was culled by the rendering engine.
- After: saw inlines correctly adjusted to lines 14, 17, and 16 (the same lines as the original), render properly, and highlight the correct lines when hovered.
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D21436
Summary:
Fixes T13554. For certain prose diff inputs and PCRE backtracking limits, this regular expression may back track too often and fail.
A characteristic input is "x x x x ...", i.e. many sequences where `(.*?)\s*\z` looks like it may be able to match but actually can not.
I think writing an expression which has all the behavior we'd like without this backtracking issue isn't trivial (at least, I don't think I know how to do it offhand); just use a strategy based on "trim()" insetad, which avoids any PCRE complexities here.
Test Plan: Locally, this passes the "x x x ..." test which the previous code failed. I'm not including that test because it won't reproduce across values of "pcre.backtrac_limit", PCRE versions, etc.
Maniphest Tasks: T13554
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D21422
Summary:
See <https://discourse.phabricator-community.org/t/bad-regex-in-prose-diff-logic/3969>.
The prose splitting rules normally guarantee that newlines appear only at the beginning or end of blocks. However, if a prose sentence ends with text like "...x\n.", we can end up with a newline inside a "sentence".
If we do, the regular expression that breaks it into pieces will fail.
Arguably, this is an error in how sentences are split apart (we might prefer to split this into two sentences, "x\n" and ".", rather than a single "x\n." sentence) but in the general case it's not unreasonable for blocks to contain newlines, so a simple fix is to make the pattern more robust.
Test Plan: Added a failing test which includes this behavior, made it pass.
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D21295
Summary:
Ref T13513. Syntax highlighting is potentially expensive, and the changeset rendering pipeline can cache it. However, the cache is currently keyed ONLY by Differential changeset ID.
Destroy the existing cache and rebuild it with a more standard cache key so it can be used in a more ad-hoc way by inline suggestion snippets.
Test Plan: Used Darkconsole, saw cache hits and no more inline syntax highlighting for changesets with many inlines.
Subscribers: PHID-OPKG-gm6ozazyms6q6i22gyam
Maniphest Tasks: T13513
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D21280
Summary: Ref T13513. Inline comment context information is somewhat expensive to construct and can be cached. Add a readthrough cache on top of it.
Test Plan: Loaded a source code changeset with many inline comments, used Darkconsole to inspect query activity. Saw caches get populated. Updated cache key, saw caches regenerate. Browsed Diffusion, nothing looked broken.
Maniphest Tasks: T13513
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D21279
Summary: Ref T13513. For now, I'm not supporting inline edit suggestions in Diffusion, although it's likely not difficult to do so in the future. Clean up some of the code so that plain ol' inlines work the same way they did before.
Test Plan:
- Created, edited, reloaded, submitted inlines in Diffusion: familiar old behavior.
- Created, edited, reloaded, submitted inlines with suggestions in Differential: familiar new behavior.
Maniphest Tasks: T13513
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D21278
Summary: Ref T13513. When rendering an inline suggestion for display, use highlighting and diffing.
Test Plan: {F7495053}
Maniphest Tasks: T13513
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D21277
Summary:
Ref T13513. This still has quite a few rough edges and some significant performance isssues, but appears to mostly work.
Allow reviewers to "Suggest Edit" on an inline comment and provide replacement text for the highlighted source.
Test Plan: Created, edited, reloaded, and submitted inline comments in various states with and without suggestion text.
Maniphest Tasks: T13513
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D21276
Summary: Ref T13513. Introduce a formal server-side content state object so the whole state can be saved and restored to the drafts table, read from the request, etc.
Test Plan: Created and edited inlines. Reloaded drafts with edits. Submitted normal and editing comments. Grepped for affected symbols.
Maniphest Tasks: T13513
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D21275
Summary:
Ref T13513. Currently, all the inline code passes around strings to describe content. I plan to add background music, animation effects, etc., soon. To prepare for this change, make content a state object.
This does not change any user-visible behavior, it just prepares for content to become more complicated than a single string.
Test Plan: Created, edited, submitted, cancelled, etc., comments.
Maniphest Tasks: T13513
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D21273
Summary:
Ref T13513. Give selected inlines a selection state and visual cues which are similar to the changeset selection state.
Also fix a couple of minor issues with select interactions and offset comments.
Test Plan: Selected inlines, saw obvious visual cues.
Maniphest Tasks: T13513
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D21256
Summary:
Ref T13513. When a user selects a text range and uses "New Inline Comment" to create a comment directly from a range, store the offset information alongside the comment.
When hovering the comment, highlight the original range.
Test Plan: {F7480926, size=full}
Maniphest Tasks: T13513
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D21250
Summary: Ref T11401. Ref T13513. This paves the way for more comment actions, particularly an edit-after-submit action.
Test Plan: Took all actions from menus, via mouse and via keyboard (where applicable).
Maniphest Tasks: T13513, T11401
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D21244
Summary:
Ref T13513. As part of inline metadata, save the document engine the change is being rendered with.
This will allow other parts of the UI to detect that an inline was created on a Jupyter notebook but is being rendered on raw source, or whatever else.
The immediate goal is to fix nonsensical inline snippet rendering in email on Jupyter notebooks.
Test Plan:
- Created inlines and replies on normal soure code, saw no document engine annotated in the database.
- Created inlines and replies on a Jupyter notebook rendered in Jupyter mode, saw "jupyter" annotations in the database.
- Swapped document engines between Jupyter and Source, etc.
Maniphest Tasks: T13513
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D21240
Summary:
Ref T13513. Currently, clicking "View" from the inline comment preview (below the "add comment" area at the bottom of the page) only works if the inline isn't being edited.
Update this behavior so it works on inlines in either "Viewing" or "Editing" states.
Test Plan:
- Clicked "View" on a normal inline, got jumped/selected.
- Clicked "View" on an editing inline, got jumped/selected.
Maniphest Tasks: T13513
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D21237
Summary:
Ref T13513. Currently, if you:
- click a line to create an inline;
- type some text;
- wait a moment; and
- close the page.
...you don't get an "Unsubmitted Draft" marker in the revision list.
Lift all the draft behavior to "InlineController" and make saving a draft dirty the overall container draft state.
Test Plan:
- Took the steps described above, got a draft state marker.
- Created, edited, submitted, etc., inlines in Diffusion and Differential.
Maniphest Tasks: T13513
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D21235
Summary: Ref T13513. All queries now go through a reasonably minimal set of pathways and should have consistent behavior.
Test Plan:
- Loaded a revision with inlines.
- Created a new empty inline, reloaded page, saw it vanish.
- Created a new empty inline, typed draft text, did not save, reloaded page, saw draft present.
- Created a new empty inline, typed draft text. Submitted feedback, got prompt, answered "Y", saw draft text submit.
- Created a new empty inline, typed draft text, scrolled down to bottom of page, typed non-draft text, saw preview include draft text.
- Marked and submitted "Done".
- Used hide/show on inlines, verified state persisted.
- Did much of the same stuff in Diffusion, where it all works the same way (except: there's no prompt when submitting draft is-editing inlines).
Maniphest Tasks: T13513
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D21234
Summary: Ref T13513. Replaces "DifferentialInlineCommentQuery" with the similar but more modern "DifferentialDiffInlineCommentQuery".
Test Plan: Viewed comments in timeline, changesets. Created, edited, and submitted comments. Hid and un-hid comments, reloading (saw state preserved).
Maniphest Tasks: T13513
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D21233
Summary: Ref T13513. Continue removing usage sites for the obsolete "DifferentialInlineCommentQuery".
Test Plan: Viewed the inline list in Differential, saw sensible inlines.
Maniphest Tasks: T13513
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D21232
Summary: Ref T13513. Move querying to "DiffInlineCommentQuery" classes and lift them into the base Controller.
Test Plan: In Differential and Diffusion, created, edited, and submitted inline comments.
Maniphest Tasks: T13513
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D21231
Summary: Ref T13513. Continue marching toward coherent query pathways for all access to inline comments.
Test Plan:
- Viewed a commit and a path within that commit, as a user with unpublished inlines and a different user.
- Saw appropriate inlines in all cases (published inlines, plus undeleted unpublished inlines authored by the current viewer).
- Grepped for "loadDraftAndPublishedComments()".
Maniphest Tasks: T13513
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D21228
Summary:
Ref T13513. Improve consistency and robustness of the "InlineComment" queries.
The only real change here is that these queries now implicitly add a clause for selecting inlines ("pathID IS NULL" or "changesetID IS NULL").
Test Plan: Browed, created, edited, and submitted inlines.
Maniphest Tasks: T13513
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D21227
Summary:
Ref T13513. Currently, inline storage objects ("TransactionComment") can't directly generate a runtime object ("InlineComment").
Allow this transformation to be performed in a genric way so clunky code which does it per-object-type can be removed, lifted, or simplified.
Simplify an especially gross callsite in preview code.
Test Plan: Previewed inline comments.
Maniphest Tasks: T13513
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D21226
Summary: Ref T13513. This controller was obsoleted by EditEngine and appears unreachable without explicitly typing the URL.
Test Plan:
- Grepped for the route, didn't find any hits.
- Deleted the controller, successfully previewed comments in Diffusion.
Maniphest Tasks: T13513
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D21224
Summary:
Ref T13519. This is a little fuzzy, but I think the workflow here is:
- View an intradiff, generating an ephemeral comparison changeset with no changeset ID. This produces a state key of "*".
- Apply "hidden" state changes to the changeset.
- View some other intradiff and/or diff view.
- The code attempts to use "*" as a changset ID?
I'm not entirely sure this is accurate; this was observed in production and I couldn't get a clean reproduction case locally.
Optimistically, try making changeset IDs explicit rather than relying on state keys to be "usually changeset-ID-like".
Test Plan: Used "hidden" locally across multiple intradiffs, but I wasn't cleanly able to reproduce the initial issue.
Maniphest Tasks: T13519
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D21223
Summary:
Ref T13513. Overloading "original text" to get "edit-on-load" comments into the right state has some undesirable side effects.
Instead, provide the text when the editor opens. This fixes a cancel interaction.
Test Plan:
- Create an inline, type text, don't save.
- Reload page.
- Cancel.
- Before: cancelled into empty state.
- After: cancelled into deleted+undo state.
Maniphest Tasks: T13513
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D21219
Summary:
Ref T13513. As users type text into inline comments, save the comment state as a draft on the server.
This has some rough edges, particularly around previews, but mostly works. See T13513 for notes.
Test Plan: Started an inline, typed some text, waited a second, reloaded the page, saw an editing inline with the saved text.
Maniphest Tasks: T13513
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D21216
Summary: Ref T13513. Refine some inline behaviors, see test plan.
Test Plan:
- Edit a comment ("A"), type text ("AB"), cancel, edit.
- Old behavior: edit and undo states (wrong, and undo does not function).
- New behavior: edit state only.
- Edit a comment ("A"), type text ("AB"), cancel. Undo ("AB"), cancel. Edit.
- Old behavior: "AB" (wrong: you never submitted this text).
- New behavior: "A".
- Create a comment, type text, cancel.
- Old behavior: counter appears in filetree (wrong, comment is undo-able but should not be counted).
- New behavior: no counter.
- Cancel editing an empty comment with no text.
- Old behavior: Something buggy -- undo, I think?
- New behavior: it just vanishes (correct behavior).
Maniphest Tasks: T13513
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D21212
Summary:
Ref T13513. Now that the "currently being edited" state of inlines is saved on the server side, clear the flag when the user clicks "Cancel" to leave the "editing" state on the client.
This also serves to delete empty comments.
Test Plan:
- Clicked a line number to create a new comment. Then:
- Clicked "Cancel". Reloaded page, saw no more comment.
- Typed text, saved. Reloaded page, saw non-editing draft. Clicked "Edit", reloaded page, saw editing draft. Clicked "Cancel", reloaded page, saw non-editing draft.
- Typed text, saved. Clicked "Edit", deleted text, saved. Reloaded page, saw no more comment.
Maniphest Tasks: T13513
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D21187
Summary:
Ref T13513. This is mostly an infrastructure cleanup change.
In a perfect world, this would be a series of several changes, but they're tightly interconnected and don't have an obvious clean, nontrivial partition (or, at least, I don't see one). Followup changes will exercise this code repeatedly and all of these individual mutations are "obviously good", so I'm not too worried about the breadth of this change.
---
Inline comments are stored as transaction comments in the `PhabricatorAuditTransactionComment` and `DifferentialTransactionComment` classes.
On top of these two storage classes sit `PhabricatorAuditInlineComment` and `DifferentialInlineComment`. Historically, these were an indirection layer over significantly different storage classes, but nowadays both storage classes look pretty similar and most of the logic is actually the same. Prior to this change, these two classes were about 80% copy/pastes of one another.
Part of the reason they're so copy/pastey is that they implement a parent `Interface`. They are the only classes which implement this interface, and the interface does not provide any correctness guarantees (the storage objects are not actually constrained by it).
To simplify this:
- Make `PhabricatorInlineCommentInterface` an abstract base class instead.
- Lift as much code out of the `Audit` and `Differential` subclasses as possible.
- Delete methods which no longer have callers, or have only trivial callers.
---
Inline comments have two `View` rendering classes, `DetailView` and `EditView`. They share very little code.
Partly, this is because `EditView` does not take an `$inline` object. Historically, it needed to be able to operate on inlines that did not have an ID yet, and even further back in history this was probably just an outgrowth of a simple `<form />`.
These classes can be significantly simplified by passing an `$inline` to the `EditView`, instead of individually setting all the properties on the `View` itself. This allows the `DetailView` and `EditView` classes to share a lot of code.
The `EditView` can not fully render its content. Move the content rendering code into the view.
---
Prior to this change, some operations need to work on inlines that don't have an inline ID yet (we assign an ID the first time you "Save" a comment). Since "editing" comments will now be saved, we can instead create a row immediately.
This means that all the inline code can always rely on having a valid ID to work with, even if that ID corresponds to an empty, draft, "isEditing" comment. This simplifies more code in `EditView` and allows the "create" and "reply" code to be merged in `PhabricatorInlineCommentController`.
---
Client-side inline events are currently handled through a mixture of `ChangesetList` listeners (good) and ad-hoc row-level listeners (less good). In particular, the "save", "cancel", and "undo" events are row-level. All other events are list-level.
Move all events to list-level. This is supported by all inlines now having an ID at all stages of their lifecycle.
This allows some of the client behavior to be simplified. It currently depends on binding complex ad-hoc dictionaries into event handlers in `_drawRows()`, but it seems like almost all of this code can be removed. In fact, no more than one row ever seems to be drawn, so this code can probably be simplified further.
---
Finally, save an "isEditing" state. When we rebuild a revision on the client, click the "edit" button if it's in this state. This is a little hacky, but simpler to get into a stable state, since the row layout of an inline depends on a "view row" followed by an "edit row".
Test Plan:
- Created comments on either side of a diff.
- Edited a comment, reloaded, saw edit stick.
- Saved comments, reloaded, saw save stick.
- Edited a comment, typed text, cancelled, "unedited" to get state back.
- Created a comment, typed text, cancelled, "unedited" to get state back.
- Deleted a comment, "undeleted" to get state back.
Weirdness / known issues:
- Drafts don't autosave yet.
- Fixed in D21187:
- When you create an empty comment then reload, you get an empty editor. This is a bit silly.
- "Cancel" does not save state, but should, once drafts autosave.
- Mostly fixed in D21188:
- "Editing" comments aren't handled specially by the overall submission flow.
- "Editing" comments submitted in that state try to edit themselves again on load, which doesn't work.
Subscribers: jmeador
Maniphest Tasks: T13513
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D21186
Summary:
Ref T13520. Generally, make the table of contents look and more like the paths panel:
- Show a hierarchy, with compression for single-sibling children.
- Use the same icons, instead of "M D" and "(img)" stuff.
- Use EditDistanceMatrix to do a piece-by-piece diff of paths changes.
- Show path changes within the path list.
I'm not entirely sold on this, but it was complicated to write and I've never heard the term "sunk cost fallacy". I think this is mostly a net improvement, but may need some adjustments and followup.
Test Plan: Viewed various changes in Differential and Diffusion, saw a more usable table of contents.
Maniphest Tasks: T13520
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D21183
Summary:
Ref T13455. Make "hidden" a changeset property similar to other changeset properties.
We don't need to render this on the server, so we make a request (to update the setting) and just discard the response.
Test Plan: {F7375468}
Maniphest Tasks: T13455
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D21158
Summary:
Ref T13455. Update the other "view state" properties to work like "highlight" now works.
Some complexity here arises from these concerns:
- In "View Standalone", we render the changeset inline. This is useful for debugging/development, and desirable to retain.
- In all other cases, we render the changeset with AJAX.
So the client needs to be able to learn about the "state" properties of the changeset on two different flows. Prior to this change, each pathway had a fair amount of unique code.
Then, some bookkeeping issues:
- At inital rendering time, we may not know which renderer will be selected: it may be based on the client viewport dimensions.
- Prior to this change, the client didn't separate "value of the property for the changeset as rendered" and "desired value of the property".
Test Plan:
- Viewed changes in Differential, Diffusion, and in standalone mode.
- Toggled renderer, character sets, and document engine (this one isn't terribly useful). Reloaded, saw them stick.
- Started typing a comment, cancelled it, hit the undo UI.
Maniphest Tasks: T13455
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D21138
Summary:
Ref T13455. Add container-level storage for persistent view state, and persist "Highlight As..." inside it.
The storage generates a "PhabricatorChangesetViewState" configuration object as an output.
When preferences are expressed on a diff and that diff is later attached to a revision, we attempt to copy the preferences.
The internal storage tracks per-changeset settings, but currently always uses "last update wins" to apply the settings in the UI.
Test Plan:
- Viewed revisions, changed highlighting, reloaded. Saw highlighting stick in revision view and standalone view.
- Viewed commits, changed highlighting, reloaded. Saw highlighting stick.
- Created a diff, changed highlighting, turned it into a revision, saw highlighting persist.
Subscribers: jmeador, PHID-OPKG-gm6ozazyms6q6i22gyam
Maniphest Tasks: T13455
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D21137
Summary: Ref T13395. Move cache classes, syntax highlighters, other markup classes, and sprite sheets to Phabricator.
Test Plan: Attempted to find any callers for any of this stuff in libphutil or Arcanist and couldn't.
Maniphest Tasks: T13395
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D20977
