Summary:
Ref T7152. This substantially completes the upstream login flow. Basically, we just cookie you and push you through normal registration, with slight changes:
- All providers allow registration if you have an invite.
- Most providers get minor text changes to say "Register" instead of "Login" or "Login or Register".
- The Username/Password provider changes to just a "choose a username" form.
- We show the user that they're accepting an invite, and who invited them.
Then on actual registration:
- Accepting an invite auto-verifies the address.
- Accepting an invite auto-approves the account.
- Your email is set to the invite email and locked.
- Invites get to reassign nonprimary, unverified addresses from other accounts.
But 98% of the code is the same.
Test Plan:
- Accepted an invite.
- Verified a new address on an existing account via invite.
- Followed a bad invite link.
- Tried to accept a verified invite.
- Reassigned an email by accepting an unverified, nonprimary invite on a new account.
- Verified that reassigns appear in the activity log.
{F291493}
{F291494}
{F291495}
{F291496}
{F291497}
{F291498}
{F291499}
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T7152
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D11737
Summary:
Ref T7152. Ref T3554.
- When an administrator clicks "send invites", queue tasks to send the invites.
- Then, actually send the invites.
- Make the links in the invites work properly.
- Also provide `bin/worker execute` to make debugging one-off workers like this easier.
- Clean up some UI, too.
Test Plan:
We now get as far as the exception which is a placeholder for a registration workflow.
{F291213}
{F291214}
{F291215}
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T3554, T7152
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D11736
Summary:
Ref T7152. This implements the administrative UI for the upstream email invite workflow.
Pieces of this will be reused in Instances to implement the instance invite workflow, although some of it is probably going to be a bit copy/pastey.
This doesn't actually create or send invites yet, and they still can't be carried through registration.
Test Plan:
{F290970}
{F290971}
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T7152
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D11733
Summary: Ref T2783. This cleans up some more of the direct VCS access calls. If the repository is local, this boils down to an in-process call. If not, it uses Conduit to make an intracluster request.
Test Plan: Used `reparse.php --message <commit> --trace` to observe cluster request.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T2783
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D11253
Summary:
Fixes T6484. I primarily need this to synchronize device public keys in the Phabricator cluster so the new stuff in T2783 works.
Although, actually, maybe I don't really need it. But I wrote it anyway and it's desirable to have sooner or later.
Test Plan: Ran method.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T6484
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D11163
Summary: Groups setup issues into Important, PHP, MySQL, and Base for easier parsing on initial installations.
Test Plan:
Test my internal server and various issues.
{F289699}
Reviewers: btrahan, epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: Korvin, epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T7207
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D11726
Summary: Rename `DifferentialChangesetParser::WHITESPACE_IGNORE_FORCE` to `DifferentialChangesetParser::WHITESPACE_IGNORE_ALL` to better reflect reality.
Test Plan: Viewed a diff with various settings for the "Whitespace changes" option.
Reviewers: #blessed_reviewers, epriestley
Reviewed By: #blessed_reviewers, epriestley
Subscribers: epriestley
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D11730
Summary: This is correct, but the root cause of the issue isn't very clear to me.
Test Plan: Poked around various pages which filter objects.
Reviewers: joshuaspence
Reviewed By: joshuaspence
Subscribers: epriestley
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D11727
Summary: Rename `DifferentialChangesetParser::WHITESPACE_IGNORE_ALL` to `DifferentialChangesetParser::WHITESPACE_IGNORE_MOST`.
Test Plan: Browsed a diff with a few different settings for "Whitespace changes".
Reviewers: epriestley, #blessed_reviewers
Reviewed By: epriestley, #blessed_reviewers
Subscribers: epriestley
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D11715
Summary:
Ref T7152. This builds the core of email invites and implements all the hard logic for them, covering it with a pile of tests.
There's no UI to create these yet, so users can't actually get invites (and administrators can't send them).
This stuff is a complicated mess because there are so many interactions between accounts, email addresses, email verification, email primary-ness, and user verification. However, I think I got it right and got test coverage everwhere.
The degree to which this is exception-driven is a little icky, but I think it's a reasonable way to get the testability we want while still making it hard for callers to get the flow wrong. In particular, I expect there to be at least two callers (one invite flow in the upstream, and one derived invite flow in Instances) so I believe there is merit in burying as much of this logic inside the Engine as is reasonably possible.
Test Plan: Unit tests only.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T7152
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D11723
Summary:
Fixes T7092. When you name project "Foo" which has primary hashtag "foo" to "Foobar", post this patch the hashtag "foo" gets added as a secondary hashtag. Also makes sure we don't normalize the hashtags in the query function as the wikimedia folks were hitting an issue around capitalization on the hashtag.
Note that T6909 remains "broken" in that you get an error that you can't do that, though if you just omit the additional hashtag it would work fine. I think if a fix is necessary here the best bet would be to simply detect this particular scenario and let things proceed; its a bit tricky though since its about two transactions about to be applied and how they interact with one another...
Test Plan: Made project "Foo" which has primary hashtag "foo". Renamed it to "Foobar" and verified "foo" was added as a secondary hashtag and "foobar" was the primary hashtag. Renamed it again to "Foo" and noted that the hashtags all ended up correct.
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: Korvin, epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T7092, T6909
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D11697
Summary:
This makes thumbnail URIs work on instanced, CDN'd installs like Phacility cluster instances.
Some of these transforms can proabably be removed, but the underlying code to generate the transform should be cleaned up too and we have some other tasks filed elsewhere about this anyway.
Test Plan: CDN'd local install now loads thumbnails properly.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D11719
Summary: Fixes T7153.
Test Plan:
used `bin/auth trust-oauth-client` and `bin/auth untrust-oauth-client` to set the bit and verify error states.
registered via oauth with `bin/auth trust-oauth-client` set and I did not have the confirmation screen
registered via oauth with `bin/auth untrust-oauth-client` set and I did have the confirmation screen
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: Korvin, epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T7153
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D11724
Summary: I //think// Maniphest has switched to real edges now.
Test Plan: N/A
Reviewers: epriestley, #blessed_reviewers
Reviewed By: epriestley, #blessed_reviewers
Subscribers: epriestley
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D11716
Summary: I think this is safe to remove now.
Test Plan: WIP
Reviewers: #blessed_reviewers, epriestley
Reviewed By: #blessed_reviewers, epriestley
Subscribers: epriestley
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D11717
Summary: Adds core and apps grouping to configuration options, makes it somewhat easier to browse config options.
Test Plan: Set each option, review list. Breakdown is nearly 50/50 apps/core.
Reviewers: btrahan, epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: Korvin, epriestley
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D11722
Summary: Ref T7210. Not sure if this fixes things, but it's definitely //an// issue.
Test Plan:
- Not able to reproduce issue locally yet.
- These get into the map now, at least?
- Saw `.woff2` URIs transform in CSS.
- Loaded a `.woff2` file.
Reviewers: btrahan, chad
Reviewed By: chad
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T7210
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D11720
Summary:
The generated HTML is like `<p>some text <div …>…</div> more text</p>`, and HTML `<p/>` tags may not contain block content like `<div/>` tags. Browsers actually parse this as if it was `<p>some text </p><div …>…</div> more text<p></p>` (sic).
The layout CSS class already has `display: inline` set, but this is not sufficient. Browser's HTML parser doesn't care what CSS rules will be applied, it only deals with the meanings of tags.
Fixes T7201.
Test Plan:
Verify that the following displays the image inline:
`some text {Fnnn,layout=inline} more text`
Reviewers: chad, epriestley, #blessed_reviewers
Reviewed By: epriestley, #blessed_reviewers
Subscribers: Korvin, epriestley
Projects: #remarkup
Maniphest Tasks: T7201
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D11706
Summary: Adds option for setting large text instead of icons. Adds success state.
Test Plan:
Built some more examples.
{F286388}
Reviewers: btrahan, epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: Korvin, epriestley
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D11710
Summary: Super duper sized panels for singluar actions.
Test Plan:
UIExamples, will need more testing in Phacility.
{F286098}
Reviewers: btrahan, epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: Korvin, epriestley
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D11709
Summary:
Ref T7208. Now that we have approvals (new installs are safe by default), take those into account when generating this warning.
Try to soften the warning to cover the case discussed in T7208, hopefully without requiring additional measures.
Test Plan:
{F286014}
{F286015}
Reviewers: btrahan, chad
Reviewed By: chad
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T7208
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D11708
Summary: Uses more standard boxes for display, and icons!
Test Plan:
Test with all enabled, all disabled, and a mix.
{F285945}
{F285946}
Reviewers: btrahan, epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: Korvin, epriestley
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D11707
Summary: Ref T7153. The "whoami" scope should be default and always on, because otherwise we can't do anything at all. Also, if a client doesn't want a certain scope, don't bother asking the user for it. To get there, had to add "scope" to the definition of a client.
Test Plan: applied the patch to a phabricator "client" and a phabricator "server" as far as oauth shenanigans go. Then I tried to login / register with oauth. If the "client" was configured to ask for "always on" access I got that in the dialogue, and otherwise no additional scope questions were present. Verified scope was properly granted in either case.
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: Korvin, epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T7153
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D11705
Summary: Ref T7153. I am not sure if this is 100% correct because sometimes you have to POST vs GET and I don't know if the redirect response will / can do the right thing? I think options to fix this would be to 1) restrict this functionality to JUST the Phabricator OAuth provider type or 2) something really fancy with an HTTP(S) future. The other rub right now is when you logout you get half auto-logged in again... Thoughts on that?
Test Plan: setup my local instance to JUST have phabricator oauth available to login. was presented with the dialog automagically...!
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: Korvin, epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T7153
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D11701
Summary: Fixes T7142. Make old permission mean "make (non-bot) users" and then nuance the UI for those administrators who can make bot accounts.
Test Plan: loaded up admin a with full powers and admin b with restricted powers. noted admin a could make a full user. noted admin b could not make a full user. noted admin b got an error even via clever uri hacking.
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: Korvin, epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T7142
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D11702
Summary: `ssh-keygen` declines to run on a too-public key. Write the correctly-restricted key a little earlier in the workflow.
Test Plan:
```
epriestley@orbital ~/dev/phabricator $ chmod 644 ~/dev/core/conf/keys/daemon.key
epriestley@orbital ~/dev/phabricator $ ./bin/almanac register --private-key ~/dev/core/conf/keys/daemon.key --identify-as local.phacility.net --device daemon.phacility.net --force --allow-key-reuse
Installing public key...
Installing private key...
Installing device ID...
HOST REGISTERED This host has been registered as "local.phacility.net" and a trusted keypair has been installed.
epriestley@orbital ~/dev/phabricator $
```
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D11700
Summary:
I'm hitting this in the cluster and couldn't figure it out after staring at it for a couple minutes. Produce a better error.
This dumps a hash of each configuration key value which is set to a non-default value into the daemon log. This is much more compact than the full config, and doesn't spread secrets around, so it seems like a good balance between providing information and going crazy with it.
Test Plan: {F284139}
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D11699
Summary: This got clobbered in D11547. Revive the code but move it up from the base class to the PeopleList controller which is presumably all the main "admin" views. Fixes T7181.
Test Plan: Saw the button once more on /people/...!
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: Korvin, epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T7181
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D11698
Summary:
Fixes T7169. We just weren't doing a policy-aware query. Basic idea here is that if you set an app to be visible only to specific users, those specific users are the only ones who should be able to authorize it.
In the Phacility cluster, this allows us to prevent users who haven't been invited from logging in to an instance.
Test Plan:
- Tried to log into an instance I was not a member of.
- Logged into an instance I am a member of.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T7169
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D11696
Summary: Fixes T7118. This does the basic "filter the list" thing, though it ends up being a little manual since I guess this hasn't come up before? There is also potential weird behavior if the user was using an app and lost access to it - they will have nothing selected on edit - but I think this is actually correct behavior in this circumstance.
Test Plan:
used a user who couldn't get access to the "quick create" apps and noted that the dropdown list on dashboard panel create was missing the expected engines
ran `arc unit --everything` to verify abstract method implemented everywhere
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: Korvin, epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T7118
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D11687
Summary: Fixes T7164. Adds some details about how the statuses will show up in the UI.
Test Plan: Read the text
Reviewers: epriestley, chad
Reviewed By: chad
Subscribers: Korvin, epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T7164
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D11686
Summary: Fixes T7117. The slightly icky part is we just build the menu items up 2x because there's no way to tell you wont be able to make a menu item unless you try to make them all and come up with nada.
Test Plan: created a user and denied them access to every application in the quick create menu. observed the "+" icon disappearing from the nav, correctly. used a different, unrestricted user and the menu showed up and worked
Reviewers: epriestley, chad
Reviewed By: chad
Subscribers: Korvin, epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T7117
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D11684
Summary: So I derped and missed the %s inside the `UPDATE` query (previously only fixing the `INSERT` query). This changes `%s` to `%B` for the update logic as well.
Test Plan: Patched it in production and saw the offending build run all the way through without UTF8-related exceptions.
Reviewers: epriestley, #blessed_reviewers
Reviewed By: epriestley, #blessed_reviewers
Subscribers: Korvin, epriestley
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D11669
Summary:
This allows us to CDN the cluster.
General problem is that we can't easily give each instance its own CDN URI (`giraffe.phcdn.net`) in Cloudfront, because it requires that you enumerate all aliases (and there's a limit of 100) and depends on SNI (a newish feature of SSL which allows one server to serve multiple certificates, but which doesn't have full support everywhere yet).
It's //possible// that we could eventually work around this, or use Cloudflare instead (which has a different model that seems like a slightly easier fit for CDN-domain-per-instance), but I don't want to sink a ton of work into this and want to keep things on AWS insofar as we reasonably can.
The easiest way to fix this is just to put the instance identity into URIs, then read it out when handling CDN requests. This has no effect on installs without cluster instance configuration, which is all of them except ours.
It's also slightly desirable to share this stuff, since we get to share the cache for static resources, which are always identical across instances.
So requests go from the Cloudfront gateway ("xyz.cloudfront.com") to the LB with a hard-coded instance name ("cdn.phacility.com"), which gets them routed to a balanced web machine. The web machine picks the correct instance name out of the URI, acts as that instance, and does the correct thing.
The messiest part of this is that we need "cdn.phacility.com" to be a real instance so it can serve static resources, but that's not a big deal. We have a few other hard-codes which have to be real resources for now, like we must have a merchant named "Phacility".
Test Plan:
- Viewed files with `security.alternate-file-domain` off (i.e., no file tokens).
- Viewed pages and files with `security.alternate-file-domain` on. Saw correct resource behavior, @isntance generation of URIs, and correct token redirect behavior for files.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D11668
Summary: Fixes T7094 (last of many revisions). Its important to do this filtering ASAP so that users can't deduce the identify of an unknown / invisible project.
Test Plan: executed a query for tasks in project foo using user bar. using user foo, lock user bar out of project foo. reissued the query and saw "no data" as well as "restricted project" in the project typeahead.
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: Korvin, epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T7094
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D11660
Summary: Ref T7094. This is a bit involved and should be tackled as a separate effort. The good news is policy still saves the day here but (back to the bad news) its a bad user experience.
Test Plan: NA, just a comment
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: Korvin, epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T7094
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D11658
Summary: Ref T7094#94295.
Test Plan: noted the absence of the TODO comment in the diff
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: Korvin, epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T7094
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D11656
Summary: Ref T7094. Switch to OmnipotentUser policy-based query since this is usually done offline, etc.
Test Plan: pretty simple code change so I just have my fingers crossed while I am typing this
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: Korvin, epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T7094
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D11655
Summary: Ref T7094. I guess theoretically someone could be making a commit and have just lost access to the revision and thus this could link this commit to that revision, but this all seems far fetched an weird? We also don't necessarily have the commit author's true identity since commit parsing can be a little funky to begin with. Anyhoo, functionally, this makes things no worse, but I am removing the TODO that would make us look at this in a fun way.
Test Plan: `bin/repository reparse --owners rXvalidhash` and it worked
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: Korvin, epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T7094
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D11654
Summary: Ref T7094. This makes the underlying class take a $user parameter, and then the worker just hands it an omnipotent user. Said underyling class is the benefactor of a small re-factor, dropping one query per-use, though the single query that now remains is policy-based so maybe its a wash or even worse. Still, gotta love one less query.
Test Plan:
a little tricky to test so some extra thought instead
basic acceptance test with `bin/repository reparse --change rValidHashHere` -- it worked!
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: Korvin, epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T7094
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D11653
Summary: Moving towards a consisent 'if header, show in object box' style around Phabricator.
Test Plan:
Grep for uses of RevisionList and make sure double boxes arent set, browse Differential, various searches, a revision, and a commit.
{F282113}
{F282114}
Reviewers: btrahan, epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: Korvin, epriestley
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D11651
Summary:
Fixes T2380. Fixes T2382. Users should really configure this, but when we had a warning before a lot of users had trouble with it.
- Tout performance benefits.
- Document easy setup via CDN.
- We have an "Ignore" button now for users who really don't care.
Test Plan:
- Set up `admin.phacility.com` through AWS CloudFront (need a few changes to handle instances to put it on the cluster in general).
- Set up `secure.phabricator.com` through CloudFlare (almost; waiting for DNS).
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: chad, epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T2382, T2380
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D11649
Summary: Ref T7094. We basically need to make sure folks can see repositories before making owners packages about code within. This cleans up things a little bit by moving a bunch of logic out of the storage class and into an editor class.
Test Plan: made a package and it worked! deleted a package and it worked! discovered buggy behavior in more complicated edits and filed T7127; note this bug exists before and after this diff.
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: Korvin, epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T7094
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D11652
Summary:
Ref T7123. Two general issues:
For proxied repositories, we currently throw a ConduitClientException, vs ConduitException for local repositories. This is inconsistent and we should fix it, but I also want to examine the use of try-the-call-and-throw at these sites since it may be something we can update. In particular, trying a call that we know will always fail is now more expensive (in proxied repositories) than it used to be.
Here, we try-and-throw for merges, but they're //never// supported in Subversion. Just don't bother trying.
Test Plan: Browsed a SVN repository with proxying set up, got a clean commit page.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T7123
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D11646
Summary:
Fixes T7122. The way this query works is a little surprising:
- If executed as `withRepositoryIDs(...)`, it assumes you are passing one //or more// repository IDs, so it will never resolve ambiguous identifiers (e.g., "123" instead of "rSVN123").
- If executed as `withRepository(...)`, it knows you are passing exactly one repository and will use that to imply context and resolve these identifiers correctly.
This isn't very obvious from the API, but I'm not sure how to make it more clear.
(Making `withRepositoryIDs()` do the `withRepository(...)` thing if only one ID was passed in would mean its behavior varied if you passed 1 vs 2 repository IDs, which seems worse / morse surprising.)
Test Plan: Various subversion UIs no longer fail to look up commits.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: mormegil, epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T7122
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D11645
Summary: Minor, adds border, reduces greys, etc.
Test Plan:
View a number of config issues, see new colors.
{F282035}
Reviewers: btrahan, epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: Korvin, epriestley
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D11650
Summary:
This is a pain to test, but we do a lot of needless "X committed thing (authored by X)" right now.
I think that's because we compare two handle links here, and they're never the same, even if they're both links to the same object.
Instead, compare the author and committer more carefully.
Test Plan: Will do it live.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D11635
Summary: Ref T7094. I am not sure when this text is legitimately exposed to users - they should be getting an error about not being able to see the object before they get an error about not being able to see a given transaction... That said, I think this text is logically correct at least.
Test Plan: read the text
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: Korvin, epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T7094
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D11632
Summary: should just be "withIDs" Ref T7094
Test Plan: submitting this very diff!
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: Korvin, epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T7094
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D11633
Summary: This got updated recently but isn't quite correct.
Test Plan: Called `arcanist.projectinfo` using the name of a proejct with a repository association.
Reviewers: btrahan
NOTE: Cowboy committing this since it breaks `arc diff`.
Summary: We probably can't land this yet, since `arc tasks` still uses `maniphest.find` and `arc close` still uses `differential.getrevision`. We should clean those up and wait at least 30 days before committing this (maybe).
Test Plan: Saw setup issues for `maniphest.find` and `differential.getrevision` calls.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley, joshuaspence, FacebookPOC, aran
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6333
Summary: Ref T7094. We already had and were mostly using "needProfileImage" on the people query class. Only real trick in this diff is deleting a conduit end point that has been marked deprecated for the better part of 3 years.
Test Plan: clicked around the people action and profiles and calendars loaded nicely.
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: Korvin, epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T7094
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D11630
Summary: Not too shabby - just convert some raw queries to the policy queries. Ref T7094.
Test Plan: NA 'cuz releeph
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: Korvin, epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T7094
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D11591
Summary: Ref T7094. This one is really straight-forward since $this->actor is always populated and the right thing to do here.
Test Plan: used the ole thinking noodle since testing email w/ attachments is really hard
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: Korvin, epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T7094
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D11589
Summary: Ref T7094. This loadRepository() method bypassed policy unnecessarily. kill it.
Test Plan: basically un-tested since arcanist projects are deprecated and the main callsites were in releeph. conduit end point still works though!
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: Korvin, epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T7094
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D11586
Summary: Revamps Profile to be like Projects, a mini portal and side nav with icons.
Test Plan: Viewed my own profile, as well as others. Test seeing my commits, tasks, diffs, and upcoming events. Checked mobile navigation.
Reviewers: btrahan, epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: Korvin, epriestley
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D11547
Summary: Use `PhutilXHPASTBinary` methods instead of `xhpast_parse` functions. Depends on D11517.
Test Plan: N/A, this is a direct swap.
Reviewers: #blessed_reviewers, epriestley
Reviewed By: #blessed_reviewers, epriestley
Subscribers: Korvin, epriestley
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D11612
Summary: This sets an icon for each config, makes it easier to scan.
Test Plan:
Reload Config page, see all new icons
{F281089}
Reviewers: btrahan, epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: Korvin, epriestley
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D11619
Summary: Clean up the error view styling.
Test Plan:
Tested as many as I could find, built additional tests in UIExamples
{F280452}
{F280453}
Reviewers: btrahan, epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: hach-que, Korvin, epriestley
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D11605
Summary: Ref T6881. This won't do much of interest on third party installs yet, but it's stable and we don't need to hold it back any longer.
Test Plan: Ran `phd start`, saw the trigger daemon start up.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T6881
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D11603
Summary: Ref T6881. If we can't automatically bill an invoice, send the account owners a mail explaining why and asking them to pay it.
Test Plan: {F279596}
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T6881
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D11602
Summary:
Ref T6881.
- Fix dead links.
- Let implementations provide more information.
- Provide more information to implementations.
Test Plan: Links work, invoices show billing periods, fewer "Subscription 6" crumbs, all is well in the world.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T6881
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D11601
Summary:
Ref T6881.
- Allow users to set a default payment method for a subscription, which we'll try to autobill (not all payment methods are autobillable, so we can't require this in the general case, and a charge might fail anyway).
- If a subscription has an autopay method, try to automatically bill it.
- Otherwise, we'll send them an email like "hey here's a bill, it couldn't autopay for some reasons, go pay it and fix those if you want".
- (That email doesn't exist yet but there's a comment about it.)
- Also some UI cleanup.
Test Plan:
- Used `bin/phortune invoice` to autobill myself some fake test money.
{F279416}
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T6881
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D11596
Summary: Self-explanatory. Also made a few methods `final`.
Test Plan: Eyeball it.
Reviewers: epriestley, #blessed_reviewers
Reviewed By: epriestley, #blessed_reviewers
Subscribers: Korvin, epriestley
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D11598
Summary: Ref T7094. The class DiffusionRequest has other public methods which use getUser() in an unguarded way. Code inspection of the call sites for loadCommit() also leads me to believe the $user is properly set.
Test Plan: clicked around diffusion a bunch and everything seemed to work okay. (happy to test any particular esoteric endpoints that come to mind)
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: Korvin, epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T7094
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D11585
Summary:
Ref T6881. This is basically just some UX.
Right now, if we invoice you, you can //technically// pay it but since we don't tell you about it and don't show it in the UI you'd have to guess the ID by manipulating the URI. We should probably be at least a little more aggressive about billing.
In the common case when we generate a cart/order, we don't show it to the user or merchant in Phortune until the user takes a payment action (basically, Phortune doesn't recognize the cart until you actually check out with it). In the current use case in Fund (and other reasonable use cases) an un-acted-upon cart hasn't been ordered yet, and is just a place for the application to store state as it hands off the workflow to Phortune.
Even if we had a real "Shop for physical goods" app, I think the same rule would apply -- the application itself would probably track and show your current cart, but it wouldn't make sense to put it into your order history in Phortune until you actually buy it.
Since invoices from subscriptions are essentially identical to not-yet-ordered-carts, that mean they also did not show up in the UI (although I think this is also desirable).
This change carves out a place for them:
- Add an "invoices" section with unpaid invoices.
- The UI shows that you have unpaid invoices.
- Invoices have a slightly different rendering, inclduing an alluring "Pay Now" button.
Some considerations:
- One thing I'm vaguely thinking about is the possibilty that users may be able to invoice one another directly, eventually. For example, we might invoice a contracting client.
- Considering this, I thought about making these carts have a special status like `STATUS_DUE`, which replaces `STATUS_READY`, or a flag like `isInvoice`.
- However, this approach was pretty involved and made the //billing// logic more complicated, so I backed off. The ultimate approach here puts more of the complexity into the display logic, which feels better to me.
- We might need an `isInvoice` flag eventually, but `subscriptionPHID` is a reasonable stand-in for now.
- The OrderTable serving double duty for rendering subscriptions feels a little muddy, but I think splitting it into two highly-redundant classes would be worse.
Test Plan:
{F279348}
{F279349}
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T6881
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D11593
Summary: The method is actually named `DivinerAtomRef::newFromDictionary`.
Test Plan: `./bin/diviner generate --publisher DivinerStaticPublisher` worked a bit better.
Reviewers: #blessed_reviewers, epriestley
Reviewed By: #blessed_reviewers, epriestley
Subscribers: Korvin, epriestley
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D11590
Summary: Allow the `DivinerPublisher` subclass to be specified via `./bin/divner generate --publisher ...`. In particular, this allows use of the (mostly broken) `DivinerStaticPublisher`.
Test Plan: Ran `./bin/diviner generate --publisher DivinerStaticPublisher`
Reviewers: epriestley, #blessed_reviewers
Reviewed By: epriestley, #blessed_reviewers
Subscribers: Korvin, epriestley
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D11588
Summary: Minor tidying and modernizing a few things.
Test Plan: Ran `./bin/diviner atomize` and `./bin/diviner generate`.
Reviewers: epriestley, #blessed_reviewers
Reviewed By: epriestley, #blessed_reviewers
Subscribers: Korvin, epriestley
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D11587
Summary: Ref T7094.
Test Plan: couldn't really test this - how does one get symbols going nowadays given they are acanist project based?
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: Korvin, epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T7094
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D11584
Summary:
Ref T6881. This generates a product, purchase and invoice for users, and there's sort of some UI for them. Stuff it doesn't do yet:
- Try to autobill when we have a CC;
- actually tell the user they should pay it;
- ask the application for anything like "how much should we charge", or tell the application anything like "the user paid".
However, these work:
- You can //technically// pay the invoices.
- You can see the invoices you paid in the past.
Test Plan: Used `bin/phriction invoice` to double-bill myself over and over again. Paid one of the invoices.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T6881
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D11580
Summary: Ref T7094. Could just delete this end point too I guess? Needed to add "withCommitPHIDs" to the differentialrevisionquery to get this done.
Test Plan: used diffusion.getcommits from conduit console and got a sensible result for a query for two commits, one with a diff and one without.
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: Korvin, epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T7094
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D11581
Summary:
Ref T6881. This adds the worker, and a script to make it easier to test. It doesn't actually invoice anything.
I'm intentionally allowing the script to double-bill since it makes testing way easier (by letting you bill the same period over and over again), and provides a tool for recovery if billing screws up.
(This diff isn't very interesting, just trying to avoid a 5K-line diff at the end.)
Test Plan: Used `bin/phortune invoice ...` to get the worker to print out some date ranges which it would theoretically invoice.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T6881
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D11577
Summary:
Ref T6881.
- Add a subscription detail page.
Minor cosmetics:
- Fix glyph, from "X" (old "X marks the spot" icon) to "diamond" (new gem icon).
- Name the initial account "Default Account" instead of "Personal Account", since this seems more general.
Test Plan:
{F278623}
And I got two full days to test that Jan 30/31 -> Feb 28 billing logic!
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T6881
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D11576
Summary:
Ref T6881. This still doesn't "work" in any reasonable sense of the word, but gets us a bit further.
I'll build out the Phortune UI a little bit next, then look at implementing the Worker to do actual billing.
Test Plan:
- Allocated an instance and saw a Subscription generate properly.
- Saw subscription show up in the Phortune UI, albeit in a very limited way.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T6881
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D11575
Summary:
Ref T7094. We should do a policy query on the files IMO because there exists a scenario where the file gets locked down directly. This requires being a bit more disciplined about setting user, which in turn requires deciding whether or not to show edit / reply links as a separate piece of logic, not conditional on user presence.
This is not the best code but I don't think it gets worse with this and is just some other nuance in any larger cleanup we take on someday.
Test Plan: looked at a revision and noted inline comments rendered correctly with reply / edit actions. looked at a diff standalone and noted no reply / edit actions as expected. looked at a "details" link on a transaction and it rendered correctly. looked at a diff in phriction of page edits and it looked good. grepped around and verified the remaining callsite in diffusion already has the setUser call.
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: Korvin, epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T7094
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D11579
Summary: Fixes T1476. The body of the email should be just the output of some diff command.
Test Plan:
git diff master > text.txt; ./bin/mail receive-test --to <configured-diff-create-address> < text.txt; a diff was successfully created...! email generated had a working link to the diff.
./bin/mail receive-test --to <configured-diff-create-address> < README.md; a diff was not created as expected...! email generated had a sensical error message, telling me that the mail body should have been generated via a diff command
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: johnny-bit, Korvin, epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T1476
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D11574
Summary: Main plan is to give conversations in Conpherence or Durable Column a different, lighter, chatty feel like Phriction.
Test Plan:
Tested a couple of threads and remarkup styles.
{F278086}
Reviewers: btrahan, epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: Korvin, epriestley
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D11562
Summary: Fixes T6819. This isn't as useful as you might think and has one horribly buggy behavior - if you edit an object which has a description and a projects field, you can be unable to remove the associated project as the automagic association from the description kicks in. Further, since we've added the ability for applications to create multiple email addresses AND herald can react to those emails - say by programmatically adding projects - the known needs for this feature are basically 0. If this proves to be false we can maybe add some other syntax for these mentions - see T6819 for ideas / discussion.
Test Plan: removed a project from a maniphest task while still mentioning it in the description and it worked!
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: Korvin, epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T6819
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D11573
Summary: Fixes T3404 (post D11565), fixes T5952. This infrastructure has been getting deployed against Maniphest and its time to get these other two applications going on it.
Test Plan: created an email address for paste and used `./bin/mail receive-test` ; a paste was successfully created
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: Korvin, epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T5952, T3404
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D11570
Summary: Ref T3404. The only mildly sketchy bit is these codepaths all load the application email directly, by-passing privacy. I think this is necessary because not getting to see an application doesn't mean you should be able to break the application by registering a colliding email address.
Test Plan:
Tried to add a registered application email to a user account via the web ui and got a pretty error.
Ran unit tests.
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: Korvin, epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T3404
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D11565
Summary: due to typehints, passing null is going to barf here. Ref D11564, ref T5039.
Test Plan: made an edit to a task from the web ui and it didnt fatal
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: Korvin, epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T5039
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D11571
Summary:
Hit this locally, with an error like:
> Version <empty string> is older than 1.9, the minimum supported version.
(Where `<empty string>` was just the empty string, not literally the text `<empty string>`.)
Be more careful about parsing versions, and parse the newer string.
Test Plan: Got "unknown version" with intentionally-broken test data, then clean readout.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D11558
Summary: Fix 'No Conpherences' layout, add 'Recent' label to list.
Test Plan: test with and without a list of threads.
Reviewers: btrahan, epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: Korvin, epriestley
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D11569
Summary:
Fixes T5039. The trick / possibly lame part here is we only match 1 application email and its undefined which one. e.g. if a user emails us at address x, y, and z only one of those will pick up the mail. Ergo, don't let users define non-sensical herald conditions like "matches all". Also document what I think was non-intuitive about the code with an inline comment; we have to return an array with just a phid from an object and out of context it feels very "what the...???"
Note this needs to be deployed to other applications still, but I think its okay to close T5039 aggressively here since its done from a user story perspective.
Test Plan: set up a herald rule to flag tasks created as blue via app email x. sent an email to x via `bin/mail receive-test` and verified the task had the blue flag
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: Korvin, epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T5039
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D11564
Summary: This adds a check to make sure the credential exists when loading it in the Drydock SSH interface. This effectively turns a fatal error (calling a method on a non-object) into a catchable exception.
Test Plan: Had a badly configured resource, saw the exception appear instead of daemon fataling.
Reviewers: epriestley, #blessed_reviewers
Reviewed By: epriestley, #blessed_reviewers
Subscribers: Korvin, epriestley
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D11530
Summary: Fixes T7007. Using `%B` permits non-UTF8 data to be appended to Harbormaster build logs. Since we're not really in control of the processes Harbormaster is running remotely, and since they may output invalid UTF8 data, we should store the invalid data instead of failing the build (due to UTF8 exception).
Test Plan: @epriestley said this was the right fix, though I haven't tested it on our production system which actually exhibits the issue yet.
Reviewers: #blessed_reviewers, epriestley
Reviewed By: #blessed_reviewers, epriestley
Subscribers: Korvin, epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T7007
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D11532
