Summary: See D1707 -- just in case the Phabricator server is configured
suspiciously.
Test Plan: Cursory inspection.
Reviewers: Makinde, btrahan
Reviewed By: Makinde
CC: aran, epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T922
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D1708
Summary:
- Move the buttons in the jump nav to iOS-style "application" buttons in the
header. These are sort of ugly right now, but I think serviceable enough. Some
day we will hire a designer whose entire job is to pick up after me.
- This gives us more room (allowing us to restore "Maniphest" and
"Differential").
- This also disassociates the app buttons from the jump nav, which was a
point of confusion (user expectation that the text input is related to the
buttons).
- Allow "Active Revisions" and "Assigned Tasks" to collapse completely. They
didn't completely collapse before because the top-level "Active Tasks" / "Active
Revisions" was sort of overloaded as quick nav to apps. Now we have app buttons.
- Reduce overall size of jump nav.
Test Plan: Looked at homepage in various states of need-for-attention.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran, epriestley
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D1694
Summary: Add comment previews and saved drafts to audits, like Maniphest /
Differential.
Test Plan: Typed stuff into the box. Got a preview. Reloaded page. Stuff was
still there. Submitted comment. Stuff is gone.
Reviewers: btrahan, jungejason
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran, epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T904
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D1699
Summary: This control is a very thin shell right now with Maniphest/Differential
code duplication; unify the implemenations better for use in Audit.
Test Plan: Clicked toggle buttons in Differential and Maniphest.
Reviewers: btrahan, jungejason
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran, epriestley
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D1700
Summary:
When users submit an audit, send email to relevant parties informing them.
Allow email to be replied to. Just basic support so far; no "!raise" stuff and
no threading with the Herald commit notification.
Test Plan: Made comments, got email. Replied to email, got comments.
Reviewers: btrahan, jungejason
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran, epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T904
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D1698
Summary:
If a user comments on a commit but they don't currently have any audits they're
authoritative on, create a new one.
This makes it easier to handle other things more consistently, like figuring out
the overall audit status of a commit and who should get emails.
Test Plan: Made comments on commits I had authority on and did not have
authority on.
Reviewers: btrahan, jungejason
Reviewed By: jungejason
CC: aran, epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T904
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D1697
Summary: Add audit information to the commit search index.
Test Plan: Updated a commit, searched for terms in its comments, got hits.
Reviewers: btrahan, jungejason
Reviewed By: jungejason
CC: aran, epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T904
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D1696
Summary: When a user posts an action in the audit tool, publish it to feed.
Test Plan: Made some comments, saw them show up in feed.
Reviewers: btrahan, jungejason
Reviewed By: jungejason
CC: aran, epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T904
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D1695
Summary: When a user has pending audits, show them on the homepage.
Test Plan: Looked at my homepage with and without pending audits.
Reviewers: btrahan, jungejason
Reviewed By: jungejason
CC: aran, epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T904
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D1692
Summary:
Allows you to write a commit rule that triggers an audit by a user (personal
rules) or a project (global rules).
Mostly this is trying to make auditing more lightweight and accessible in
environments where setting up Owners packages doesn't make sense.
For instance, Disqus wants a rule like "trigger an audit for everything that
didn't have a Differential revision". While not necessarily scalable, this is a
perfectly reasonable rule for a small company, but a lot of work to implement
with Owners (and you'll get a lot of collateral damage if you don't make every
committer a project owner).
Instead, they can create a project called 'Unreviewed Commits' and write a rule
like:
- When: Differential revision does not exist
- Action: Trigger an Audit for project: "Unreviewed Commits"
Then whoever cares can join that project and they'll see those audits in their
queue, and when they approve/raise on commits their actions will affect the
project audit.
Similarly, if I want to look at all commits that match some other rule (say,
XSS) but only want to do it like once a month, I can just set up an audit rule
and go through the queue when I feel like it.
NOTE: This abuses the 'packagePHID' field to also store user and project PHIDs.
Through the magic of handles, this (apparently) works fine for now; I'll do a
big schema patch soon but have several other edits I want to make at the same
time.
Also:
- Adds an "active" fiew for /audit/, eventually this will be like the
Differential "active" view (stuff that is relevant to you right now).
- On commits, highlight triggered audits you are responsible for.
Test Plan: Added personal and global audit triggers to Herald, reparsed some
commits with --herald, got audits. Browsed all audit interfaces to make sure
nothing exploded. Viewed a commit where I was responsible for only some audits.
Performed audits and made sure the triggers I am supposed to be responsible for
updated properly.
Reviewers: btrahan, jungejason
Reviewed By: jungejason
CC: aran, epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T904
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D1690
Summary: just changed the regex to only look at the beginning of the string
Test Plan: works with: s PhabricatorDAO, rP, r,
rPda892bde7c6e9c8f08572fde2d55c934f26dbb86
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: ddfisher, aran, epriestley
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D1703
Test Plan:
Go to revision with lots of comments in Firefox.
Click on one of the last three comments permalink.
Repeat in Chrome.
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: aran, epriestley
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D1702
Summary:
Current approach has several problems:
- if there is no link in the cell then it still shows a link cursor
- if there is a link then it is clickable only on the text
Test Plan:
Display file in Differential, hover over cell with link.
Repeat for Paste.
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: aran, epriestley
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D1701
Summary:
I added multiline highlighting with the syntax:
http://site/path/to/file$from-to
NOTE: you can reverse the from and to
Test Plan: Open a file in diffusion and attempt to highlight multiple lines
Reviewers: epriestley
CC: aran, epriestley
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D1693
Summary:
D1631 updated the url for related commits, but missed the link here. This
rev updates the link in the owners tool list.
Task ID: #
Blame Rev:
Test Plan:
clicked the link, and it worked
Revert Plan:
Tags:
Reviewers: epriestley, jungejason
Reviewed By: jungejason
CC: aran, epriestley
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D1691
Summary:
This is intended to supplant the existing "audit edit" interface. I've changed
them to both drive down the same write pathway, but the UIs are still different.
I'll fully merge them in a future diff.
Add a comment box (like Maniphest and Differential) to Diffusion. When users
make comments, their comments appear on the commit. Any audits triggers they are
responsible for are updated to reflect actions they take, as well.
Currently, audits can only be triggered by packages, but I intend to allow them
to be triggered by users and projects (via herald rules) in an upcoming diff.
Thus some of the language like "projects, users or packages" when the code is
clearly dealing only with "packagePHID".
Test Plan: Made audit updates via commit interface and via existing edit
interface. Verified both interfaces updated correctly, and that audit
responsibility rules were applied properly.
Reviewers: btrahan, jungejason
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran, epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T904
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D1688
Summary:
beyond the title, this diff tweaks the test console to have a bit more
functionality. also makes a small change to CSS for AphrontFormControlMarkup,
which IMO fixes a display issue on
https://secure.phabricator.com/settings/page/profile/ where the Profile URI is
all up in the air and whatnot
I think this is missing pagination. I am getting tired of the size though and
will add later. See T905.
Test Plan:
viewed, updated and deleted client authorizations. viewed, created,
updated and deleted clients
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: aran, epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T849, T850, T848
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D1683
Summary: We already allow you to create comments, but we don't show them on the
commit page. After style / view unification this is easy; show comments on the
commit page.
Test Plan: Made comments on a commit using the audit too, saw them show up in
Diffusion.
Reviewers: btrahan, jungejason
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran, epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T904
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D1687
Summary:
I want to add comments to commits, and they should obviously share code with the
nearly-identical comments in Maniphest and Differential. Unify code/style as
much as possible.
This program made possible by a generous grant from D1513.
Test Plan:
- Looked at a bunch of different Differential and Maniphest comments; they
appeared to render identically to how they looked before.
- Tested some edge cases like anchors and "show details" on description edits
in Maniphest.
Reviewers: btrahan, jungejason
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran, epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T904
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D1686
Summary:
Currently, audits are only accessible through the Owners tool. Start moving them
to their own first-class tool in preparation for broader audit integration.
- Lay some infrastructure groundwork (e.g. AuditQuery).
- Build a basic /audit/ view.
- Show audits on the commit page in Diffusion.
This has some code duplication with stuff we've already got, but I'll merge
everything together as we move forward on this.
Test Plan: Looked at /audit/ and a commit.
Reviewers: btrahan, jungejason
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran, epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T904
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D1685
Summary:
First stab at a batch editor for Maniphest. Basically, you can select a group of
tasks and then import them into the "batch" interface, where you can edit all of
them at once.
High level goal is to make it easier for users in PM/filer/support/QA roles to
deal with large numbers of tasks quickly.
This implementation has a few major limitations:
- The only available actions are "add projects" and "remove projects".
- There is no review / undo / log stuff.
- All the changes are applied in-process, which may not scale terribly well.
However, the immediate need is just around projects and this seemed like a
reasonable place to draw the line for a minimal useful version of the tool.
Test Plan: Used batch editor to add and remove projects from groups of tasks.
Reviewers: btrahan, yairlivne
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran, epriestley, sandra
Maniphest Tasks: T441
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D1680
Summary:
Added what's new flood protection and fixed array_push issues.
Also added rhetoric for "Commit"
Test Plan: say "What's new?" twice within one minute
Reviewers: epriestley
CC: aran, epriestley
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D1684
Summary:
Added "What's new?" to the ircbot
====Matches
```What is new?
What's new?
Whats new```
Test Plan:
<`Korvin> what is new?
<korvinbot-local> Derpen created D1: Herped the derp - http://phabricator.net/D1
It shows five.
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: epriestley, aran
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D1666
Summary:
This is so freaking cool that I will try to implement it also on Facebook.
Idea is from
http://strd6.com/2011/09/html5-javascript-pasting-image-data-in-chrome/.
I don't know how to properly detect support but lying about it is not a big
deal.
Test Plan:
Go to revision comment textarea.
Paste some text data - works as usual.
Paste some image data in Chrome - file is uploaded and a link to it is inserted.
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: aran, epriestley
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D1681
Summary:
The mailing list page in MetaMTA only showed the first 100
sorted by ID, so it made it seem like lists were missing. Changed it to
do paging and short by name, so it has some user-understandable order.
Test Plan:
- Go to /mail/lists/
- Step through pager, confirm ordering.
Reviewers: nh, epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: aran, epriestley
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D1670
Summary: Document "--" list sytle and improve explicitness of list documentation
in general.
Test Plan: Generated, read documentation.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran, epriestley
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D1661
Summary: D1595 split encodeJSONForHTTPResponse() into two methods, but left a
straggling $use_javelin_shield parameter which is no longer used.
Test Plan: Caught errors in error log.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran, epriestley
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D1663
Summary:
When a comments add reviewers or CCs, we just dump that sort of nastily into the
body. Put it in the header like Maniphest instead.
Also, record the diff associated with "update" actions and link to it (T871).
Test Plan: {F8546} {F8547}
Reviewers: btrahan, davidreuss
Reviewed By: davidreuss
CC: aran, epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T871
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D1659
Summary: The /public/ rule needs to come before the more general subfilter rule.
Test Plan: Hit "all", "my projects" and "public" feeds, they all work.
Reviewers: davidreuss
Reviewed By: davidreuss
CC: aran, epriestley
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D1667
Summary:
DifferentialRevisionListView requires setFields to be called before
calling getRequiredHandlePHIDs; this adds that call for DiffusionController
Test Plan:
loaded diffusion and saw the "Pending Differential Revisions" section
populated, and no errors in the darkconsole
Reviewers: epriestley, btrahan, jungejason
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: aran, epriestley
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D1665
for scope
Summary:
this patch makes the access token response "complete" relative to spec by
returning when it expires AND that the token_type is in fact 'Bearer'.
This patch also lays the groundwork for scope by fixing the underlying data
model and adding the first scope checks for "offline_access" relative to expires
and the "whoami" method. Further, conduit is augmented to open up individual
methods for access via OAuth generally to enable "whoami" access. There's also
a tidy little scope class to keep track of all the various scopes we plan to
have as well as strings for display (T849 - work undone)
Somewhat of a hack but Conduit methods by default have SCOPE_NOT_ACCESSIBLE. We
then don't even bother with the OAuth stuff within conduit if we're not supposed
to be accessing the method via Conduit. Felt relatively clean to me in terms
of additional code complexity, etc.
Next up ends up being T848 (scope in OAuth) and T849 (let user's authorize
clients for specific scopes which kinds of needs T850). There's also a bunch of
work that needs to be done to return the appropriate, well-formatted error
codes. All in due time...!
Test Plan:
verified that an access_token with no scope doesn't let me see
anything anymore. :( verified that access_tokens made awhile ago expire. :(
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: aran, epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T888, T848
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D1657
Summary:
I typed up like 30 pages here and then got my soul crushed by T895, but here's
the summary:
I looked at several charting libraries. There aren't very many that seem to be
any good and have an open-source license.
I also want the charts to be scriptable in JS so we can add good interactivity
where appropriate.
Raphael is an SVG drawing library which seems very solid. gRaphael is a charting
library on top of Raphael that is a lot less solid, but seems kind of OK.
Overall, I think this selection gives us a lot of flexibility, although we'll
have to pay some costs up front. I'd rather do that then get limited later,
though.
That said, I'm open to other suggestions here if anyone has experience or wants
to take a different stab at researching things.
This is largely for @vii and D1643.
Test Plan: Created a basic, fairly OK chart (see next revision).
Reviewers: btrahan, vii
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran, epriestley
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D1654
Summary:
I haven't actually been using this as much as I thought, and am more interested
in the full view than the per-project view.
Let's try moving it off /home/ and then maybe adding some filtering options at
some point.
Test Plan: Looked at "all" and "my projects" in feed. Looked at home page.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran, epriestley
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D1658
Summary:
Show some statistics, like number of revisions, number of
revisions per week, lines per revision, etc. for phrivolous amusement.
Test Plan:
- Went to /differential/stats/revisions/
Numbers seem right
- Clicked 'Accepted'
Again
- Changed to another user with long history
Load time was not too long though delay noticeable
- Clicked 'Requested changes to'
User was preserved, looks good
Reviewers: epriestley, btrahan
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: aran, epriestley
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D1643
create new tasks
Summary: see title
Test Plan: Tested jump nav and found the correct urls were being loaded. Old
functionality was not effected.
Reviewers: epriestley, btrahan
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: ddfisher, allenjohnashton, kpark517, aran, epriestley
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D1642
Summary: This makes the oauth server a bunch more useful.
Test Plan:
- used /oauth/phabricator/diagnose/ and it actually passed!
- played around with conduit via hacking URL to include access_token on a logged
out browser
- linked my account to itself by going to /settings/page/phabricator/, clicking
"link" account, then cutting and pasting the pertinent ?code=X into
/oauth/phabricator/login/.
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: aran, epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T852
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D1644
Summary:
Build the revision list table out of custom fields instead of hard-coding it, so
installs can add all sorts of zany things to it.
NOTE: You may need to implement sortFieldsForRevisionList() if you have a custom
DifferentialFieldSelector, or some fields might show up out of order.
This implementation will preserve the expected behavior:
public function sortFieldsForRevisionList(array $fields) {
$default = new DifferentialDefaultFieldSelector();
return $default->sortFieldsForRevisionList($fields);
}
Test Plan:
- Loaded differential revision list, identical to old list.
- Profiled page to verify the cost increase isn't significant (it's quite
small).
Reviewers: jungejason, btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran, btrahan, davidreuss, epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T773, T729
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D1388
Summary:
adds a Phabricator OAuth server, which has three big commands:
- auth - allows $user to authorize a given client or application. if $user has already authorized, it hands an authoization code back to $redirect_uri
- token - given a valid authorization code, this command returns an authorization token
- whoami - Conduit.whoami, all nice and purdy relative to the oauth server.
Also has a "test" handler, which I used to create some test data. T850 will
delete this as it adds the ability to create this data in the Phabricator
product.
This diff also adds the corresponding client in Phabricator for the Phabricator
OAuth Server. (Note that clients are known as "providers" in the Phabricator
codebase but client makes more sense relative to the server nomenclature)
Also, related to make this work well
- clean up the diagnostics page by variabilizing the provider-specific
information and extending the provider classes as appropriate.
- augment Conduit.whoami for more full-featured OAuth support, at least where
the Phabricator client is concerned
What's missing here... See T844, T848, T849, T850, and T852.
Test Plan:
- created a dummy client via the test handler. setup development.conf to have
have proper variables for this dummy client. went through authorization and
de-authorization flows
- viewed the diagnostics page for all known oauth providers and saw
provider-specific debugging information
Reviewers: epriestley
CC: aran, epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T44, T797
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D1595
Summary: Update Phabricator for Remarkup changes in D1638.
Test Plan: Looked at various sorts of nested, enumerated, and phantom-item
lists.
Reviewers: btrahan, jungejason
Reviewed By: jungejason
CC: aran, epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T885
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D1639
Summary:
A few similar requests have come in across several tools and use cases that I
think this does a reasonable job of resolving.
We currently send one email for each update an object receives, but these aren't
always appreciated:
- Asana does post-commit review via Differential, so the "committed" mails are
useless.
- Quora wants to make project category edits to bugs without spamming people
attached to them.
- Some users in general are very sensitive to email volumes, and this gives us
a good way to reduce the volumes without incurring the complexity of
delayed-send-batching.
The technical mechanism is basically:
- Mail may optionally have "mail tags", which indicate content in the mail
(e.g., "maniphest-priority, maniphest-cc, maniphest-comment" for a mail which
contains a priority change, a CC change, and a comment).
- If a mail has tags, remove any recipients who have opted out of all the
tags.
- Some tags can't be opted out of via the UI, so this ensures that important
email is still delivered (e.g., cc + assign + comment is always delivered
because you can't opt out of "assign" or "comment").
Test Plan:
- Disabled all mail tags in the web UI.
- Used test console to send myself mail with an opt-outable tag, it was
immediately dropped.
- Used test console to send myself mail with an opt-outable tag and a custom
tag, it was delivered.
- Made Differential updates affecting CCs with and without comments, got
appropriate delivery.
- Made Maniphest updates affecting project, priority and CCs with and without
comments, got appropriate delivery.
- Verified mail headers in all cases.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran, epriestley, moskov
Maniphest Tasks: T616, T855
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D1635
