Summary: Ref T6237. This sets us up for some future work like T6152, T6200 and generally cleaning up this workflow a bit. Tried to do as little as possible so not exposing transaction view yet. (Though that timeline is going to be a little funky in the common case of just the lone create transaction.)
Test Plan: made a diff from web ui and it worked. made a herald rule to block certain diffs then tried to make such a diff and saw UI letting me know i was blocked
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: Korvin, epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T6237
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10869
Summary: Fixes T1768. This is mostly a data cleanliness issue as duplicate rows don't really do anything, but let's clear it up now.
Test Plan: made some duplicate rows by adding the same auditor multiple times. ran ./bin/storage upgrade and it worked perfectly!
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: Korvin, epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T1768
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10849
Summary: See <https://github.com/phacility/phabricator/issues/760>. We removed these methods in D10832 but still need the migration to be able to do project checks.
Test Plan: Ran on a test wiki with `/`, `/projects/` and `/projects/example/`. The first two pages didn't try to use project policies; the third one did.
Reviewers: btrahan, chad
Reviewed By: chad
Subscribers: epriestley
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10836
We have at least one project with `null` as a viewPolicy. This should get
sorted out separately, but make the migration robust against it.
Auditors: btrahan
Summary: Ref T4029. this diff makes the pertinent database changes AND adds the migration script. This is important to get the data backend straightened away before we fully ship T4029. Next diff will expose the edit controls for these policies and whatever else work is needed to get that part done right.
Test Plan: made sure the lone project page on my wiki had a project with restrictive view policy. Post migration verified correct policy applied to this lone project page AND most open policy applied to the others
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: Korvin, epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T4029
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10814
Summary:
Ref T5833. This fixes a few weird things with this table:
- A bunch of columns were nullable for no reason.
- We stored an MD5 hash of the key (unusual) but never used it and callers were responsible for manually populating it.
- We didn't perform known-key-text lookups by using an index.
Test Plan:
- Ran migrations.
- Faked duplicate keys, saw them clean up correctly.
- Added new keys.
- Generated new keys.
- Used `bin/auth-ssh` and `bin/auth-ssh-key`.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T5833
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10805
Summary: Ref T1191. A couple of installs have hit issues with this table, so clean it up before adjustment adds a unique key to it.
Test Plan: Dropped key, added duplicate rows, ran patch, got cleanup, ran adjust to get the key back.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T1191
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10799
Summary:
Ref T1191. Use `storage quickstart` to regenerate `quickstart.sql` using modern schema construction statements.
This puts new installs into utf8mb4 mode immediately without requiring storage adjustment.
Test Plan:
- Ran `arc unit --everything`, which uses quickstart.
- Ran `bin/storage upgrade --namespace temp`, to quickstart a new namespace.
- Ran `bin/storage upgrade --namespace temp --disable-utf8mb4`, to quickstart a new namespace without utf8mb4 support.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T1191
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10797
Summary:
Fixes T6487. Ref T1191. Ref T4029. D10756 introduced, but did not populate, this column. This can cause it to fill with `"\0\0\0..."` after adjustment.
Regardless of the adjustment issue, it's nice to populate this column anyway because there's no fundamental reason an object can't have mail sent about it without being saved first, even though it may not practically be possible in the codebase today.
Test Plan:
- Ran `storage upgrade`, saw the column populate for older documents.
- Forced a couple of keys to bad values (too short or with "\0") and saw the migration fix them.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T4029, T1191, T6487
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10804
Summary: Ref T5833. Since these will no longer be bound specifically to users, bring them to a more central location.
Test Plan:
- Edited SSH keys.
- Ran `bin/ssh-auth` and `bin/ssh-auth-key`.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T5833
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10791
Summary:
Ref T5833. Allow services and devices to be tagged with projects.
(These fluff apply implementations are a good example of the issue discussed in T6403.)
Test Plan: {F229569}
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T5833
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10782
Summary:
Ref T5833. Currently, we have an `AlmanacDeviceProperty`, but it doesn't use CustomFields and is specific to devices. Make this more generic:
- Reuse most of the CustomField infrastructure (so we can eventually get easy support for nice editor UIs, etc).
- Make properties more generic so Services, Bindings and Devices can all have them.
The major difference between this implementation and existing CustomField implementations is that all other implementations are application-authoritative: the application code determines what the available list of fields is.
I want Almanac to be a bit more freeform (basically: you can write whatever properties you want, and we'll put nice UIs on them if we have a nice UI available). For example, we might have some sort of "ServiceTemplate" that says "a database binding should usually have the fields 'writable', 'active', 'credential'", which would do things like offer these as options and put a nice UI on them, but you should also be able to write whatever other properties you want and add services without building a specific service template for them.
This involves a little bit of rule bending, but ends up pretty clean. We can adjust CustomField to accommodate this a bit more gracefully later on if it makes sense.
Test Plan: {F229172}
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T5833
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10777
Summary:
This implements as little as possible to stick a working transactions + editor codepath in the basic create / edit flow. Aside from the transaction tables, this also required adding a mailKey to a phrictionDocument.
Future work would include adding more transactions types for things like "move" and all the pertinent support. Even future work is to add things like policies which will work easily in the transaction framework. Ref T4029.
Test Plan:
- made a wiki doc
- edit a wiki doc
- had someone subscribe to a wiki doc and edited it
For all three, the edits worked, a reasonable email was sent out, and feed stories were generated.
- made a wiki doc at a /location/like/this
document "stubs" were made as expected in /location and /location/like
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: chad, Korvin, epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T4029
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10756
Summary: Ref T5833. Allows you to bind a service (like `db.example.com`) to one or more interfaces (for example, to specify a pool with one read/write host and two read-only hosts). You can't configure which hosts have which properties yet, but you can add all the relevant interfaces to the service. Next diff will start supporting service, binding, and device properties like "is writable", "is active", etc., so that Almanac will be able to express operations like "change which database is writable", "disable writes", "bring a device down", etc.
Test Plan: See screenshots.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T5833
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10745
Summary: Ref T5833. An interface is an IP (maybe v4, maybe v6) and port on a specified network (public internet, VPN, NAT block, etc).
Test Plan: See screenshots.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T5833
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10718
Summary: Ref T5833. This differentiates address spaces like the public internet from VPNs, so when a service is available at `192.168.0.1`, we'll know it's on some specific NAT block or whatever.
Test Plan: See screenshots.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T5833
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10715
Summary: Ref T5833. The "uninteresting" part of this object is virtually identical to AlmanacService.
Test Plan: See screenshots.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T5833
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10714
Summary: Ref T5833. See that task for functional goals and some discussion of design.
Test Plan: See screenshots.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T5833
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10713
Summary: Ref T2787. When order statuses change, send merchants and users email about it.
Test Plan: Used `bin/mail` to review mail.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T2787
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10694
Summary: Ref T2787. I mostly just want these in place so I can glue emails to them, but they're also useful on their own.
Test Plan: {F216515}
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T2787
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10688
Summary:
Ref T2787. Make this a little more concrete with explicit membership instead of a general edit policy. In particular, we need to know who to email when orders happen, and can't reasonably do that with an edit policy.
I imagine this might eventually get more nuanced (e.g., users who can only approve orders vs users who can manage the merchant itself) but that's a long ways away.
Test Plan: {F216284}
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T2787
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10681
Summary: Ref T5835. Make fund stories publish to feed and send email.
Test Plan: Made edits, etc., saw them in feed and outbound email.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T5835
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10677
Summary:
Ref T2787. This has some rough edges but basically works.
- Users can cancel orders that are in incomplete states (or in complete states, if the application allows them to -- for example, some future application might allow cancellation of billed-but-not-shipped orders).
- Merchant controllers can partially or fully refund orders from any state after payment.
Test Plan: This is still rough around the edges, but issued Stripe and WePay refunds.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: chad, epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T2787
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10664
Summary:
Ref T2787.
- Allow merchants to disable payment providers.
- Show more useful information about providers on the payments page.
- Make test vs live more clear.
- Show merchant status.
- Add a description to merchants to flesh them out a bit -- the merchant areas of responsibilities seem to be fitting well with accounts, etc.
Test Plan: {F215109}
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T2787
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10662
Summary:
Ref T2787. Builds on D10649 by rebining existing objects (carts, charges, etc) to merchantPHIDs and providerPHIDs instead of an implicit global merchant and weird global artifacts (providerType / providerKey).
Basically:
- When you create something that users can pay for, you specify a merchant to control where the payment goes.
- Accounts are install-wide, but payment methods are bound to merchants. This seems to do a reasonable job of balancing usability and technical concerns.
- Replace a bunch of weird links between objects with standard PHIDs.
- Improve "add payment method" flow.
Test Plan: Went through the Fund flow with Stripe and WePay, funding an initiative.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T2787
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10652
Summary:
Ref T2787. Instead of making providers global configuration, make them a thing on merchants with web configuration.
Payment methods and some of the pyament workflow needs to be retooled a bit after this, but this seemed like a reasonable cutoff point for this diff.
Test Plan: See screenshots.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T2787
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10649
Summary:
Ref T2787. Currently, you add payment providers (Stripe, Paypal, etc) in global configuration.
Generally, this approach is cumbersome, limiting, and often hard for users to figure out. It also doesn't provide a natural way to segment payment receivers or provide web access to administrative payment functions like issuing refunds, canceling orders, etc. I think that stuff definitely needs to be in the web UI, and the rule for access to it can't reasonably just be "all administrators" in a lot of reasonable cases.
The only real advantage is that it prevents an attacker from adjusting settings and pointing something at an account they control. But this attack can be mitigated through notifications, some sort of CLI-only merchant lock, payment accounts being relatively identifiable, etc.
So introduce "merchants", which are basically payable entities. An individual merchant will have attached Paypal, Stripe, etc., accounts, and access rules. When you buy something in an application, the merchant to pay is also specified. They also provide an umbrella for dealing with permissions down the line.
This may get a //little// cumbersome because if there are several merchants your saved card information is not shared across them. I think that will be fine in the normal case (most installs will have only one merchant). Even if it isn't and we leave providers global, I think introducing this is the right call from a web UI / permissions point of view. I'll play around with it in the next couple of diffs and figure out exactly where the line goes.
Test Plan: Listed, created, edited, viewed merchants.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T2787
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10648
Summary: Ref T2787. Similar to D10634, give applications more control over the cart workflow. For now this just means they get to pick exit URIs, but in the future they can manage more details of cart behavior.
Test Plan: Funded an initiative and got returned to the initiative instead of dead-ending in Phortune.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T2787
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10638
Summary: Ref T2787. `Product` is currently a fairly heavy object, but as Phortune develops it makes a lot of sense to make it a lighter object and put more product logic in applications. Convert it into a fairly lightweight reference to applications. The idea is that Phortune is mostly providing a cart flow, and applications manage the details of products.
Test Plan: Funded an initiative for $1.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T2787
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10634
Summary:
Ref T2787. Phortune currently stores a bunch of stuff as `...inUSDCents`. This ends up being pretty cumbersome and I worry it will create a huge headache down the road (and possibly not that far off if we do Coinbase/Bitcoin soon). Even now, it's more of a pain than I figured it would be.
Instead:
- Provide an application-level serialization mechanism.
- Provide currency serialization.
- Store currency in an abstract way (currently, as "1.23 USD") that can handle currencies in the future.
- Change all `...inUSDCents` to `..asCurrency`.
- This generally simplifies all the application code.
- Also remove some columns which don't make sense or don't make sense anymore. Notably, `Product` is going to get more abstract and mostly be provided by applications.
Test Plan:
- Created a new product.
- Purchased a product.
- Backed an initiative.
- Ran unit tests.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T2787
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10633
Summary:
Ref T4209. This creates storage for public keys against authorized hosts, such that servers can be authorized to make Conduit calls as the omnipotent user.
Servers are registered into this system by running the following command once:
```
bin/almanac register
```
NOTE: This doesn't implement authorization between servers, just the storage of public keys.
Placing this against Almanac seemed like the most sensible place, since I'm imagining in future that the `register` command will accept more information (like the hostname of the server so it can be found in the service directory).
Test Plan: Ran `bin/almanac register` and saw the host (and public key information) appear in the database.
Reviewers: #blessed_reviewers, epriestley
Reviewed By: #blessed_reviewers, epriestley
Subscribers: epriestley, Korvin
Maniphest Tasks: T4209
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10400
Summary:
Ref T1191. Although I fixed some of the mutations earlier (in D10598), I missed the column mutations under old versions of MySQL. In particular, this isn't valid:
- `ALTER TABLE ... MODIFY columnName VARCHAR(64) COLLATE binary`
Issue the permitted version of this instead, which is:
- `ALTER TABLE ... MODIFY columnName VARBINARY(64)`
Also fixed an issue where a clean schema had the wrong nullability for a column in the draft table. Force it to the expected nullability.
The other trick here is around the one column with a FULLTEXT index on it, which needs a little massaging.
Test Plan:
- Forced my local install to return `false` for utf8mb4 support.
- Did a clean adjust into `binary` columns.
- Poked around, added emoji to things.
- Reverted the fake check and did a clean adjust into `utf8mb4` columns.
- Emoji survived.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: fabe, epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T1191
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10627
Summary:
Ref T1191. Now that the whole database is covered, we don't need to do as much work to build expected schemata. Doing them database-by-database was helpful in converting, but is just reudndant work now.
Instead of requiring every application to build its Lisk objects, just build all Lisk objects.
I removed `harbormaster.lisk_counter` because it is unused.
It would be nice to autogenerate edge schemata, too, but that's a little trickier.
Test Plan: Database setup issues are all green.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley, hach-que
Maniphest Tasks: T1191
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10620
Summary:
Ref T1191. Long ago, Maniphest generated with 40-character mail keys. These prevent the migration to `bytes20`. We had about 300 of these on secure.phabricator.com from several years ago.
Just truncate them. This adjusts reply-to addresses, but it's very likely that none are relevant anymore.
Test Plan: Ran migration on `secure.phabricator.com` to truncate keys.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T1191
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10615
Summary: Ref T1191. This predates the mdoern patch stuff and may exist on very, very old installs. By the time they apply this patch, it's guaranteed it won't matter anymore. Drop it to make the schemata consistent with expectations.
Test Plan: Ran patch on installs with and without the table.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T1191
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10611
Summary:
Ref T1191. This destroys surplus columns:
- Pholio's transaction comments have a `mockID` column, but this is not used. The `imageID` column is used instead.
- Phragment has an unused `description` column.
- Releeph has an unused `summary` column.
Test Plan:
- Grepped for usage of these columns.
- Checked that these exist in production, too.
- Ran upgrades.
- Added Pholio inline comments.
- Saw fewer warnings.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley, hach-que
Maniphest Tasks: T1191
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10591
Summary:
Ref T1191. Notable:
- Drops a very old saved query table. See comments inline: plan was to remove it after a year. It's been ~a year and two weeks.
- This has our only fulltext index. I'm not supporting that formally for now, but left a note.
- This has our only MyISAM table. I'm not supporting that explicitly for now, but it shouldn't affect anything. I may deal with this in the future.
- These tables don't actually write directly via Lisk, so there's some fiddling to get the schemata right.
Test Plan: Down to ~250 warnings. No more surplus databases or tables.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T1191
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10589
Summary:
Ref T1191.
- Removes ponder comment table. This was migrated a very long time ago.
Test Plan:
- Grepped for removed table.
- Saw ~100 fewer issues in web UI.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T1191
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10582
Summary:
Ref T1191. Notes:
- Drops the project affiliation table. This is a very old membership table which was migrated to edges.
- Drops the subproject table. This is a very old table for a removed feature.
Test Plan:
- Grepped for dropped tables.
- Saw ~100 fewer setup issues.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T1191
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10581
Summary:
Ref T1191. Some notes here:
- Drops the old LDAP and OAuth info tables. These were migrated to the ExternalAccount table a very long time ago.
- Separates surplus/missing keys from other types of surplus/missing things. In the long run, my plan is to have only two notice levels:
- Error: something we can't fix (missing database, table, or column; overlong key).
- Warning: something we can fix (surplus anything, missing key, bad column type, bad key columns, bad uniqueness, bad collation or charset).
- For now, retaining three levels is helpful in generating all the expected scheamta.
Test Plan:
- Saw ~200 issues resolve, leaving ~1,300.
- Grepped for removed tables.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T1191
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10580
Summary:
Ref T1191.
- This drops two tables.
- Both tables were migrated to transactions a very long time ago and no longer have readers or writers.
Test Plan: Saw ~150 fewer warnings.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T1191
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10576
Summary:
Ref T1191.
- Adds support for custom fields.
- Adds support for partial indexes (indexes on a prefix of a column).
- Drops old auxiliary storage table: this was moved to custom field storage about a year ago.
- Drops old project table: this was moved to edges about two months ago.
Test Plan:
- Viewed web UI, saw fewer issues.
- Used `grep` to verify no readers/writers for storage or project table.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T1191
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10526
Summary:
Ref T1191.
- There was a varchar(50) column. I changed it to `text64`, since this length is unusual.
- There was an int(3) column. I changed it to `int32`, since this length is unusual.
Test Plan: Ran migrations, saw warnings disappear from config tool.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T1191
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10524
Summary: Ref T1191. This was migrated to transactions a very long time ago.
Test Plan: Ran migration, grepped, left comments in Slowvote.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T1191
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10523
Summary:
Ref T1191.
- Fixes T6096. We've migrated away from this table in T4896. The data is now in the transaction table. There have been no reads or writes to this table for some time and I haven't seen any issues from users.
- Fixes T6097. Same deal as above. The data is now in the transaction comment table.
- Fixes T6100. This cache is safe to wipe out, since it's purely read-through. Wiping it will make the migration faster. The column type change fixes storage of PHP serialized objects in a text column.
Test Plan:
- Ran migrations.
- Observed some yellow go blue on the Database Status screen.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T6096, T6100, T6097, T1191
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10520
Summary:
Fixes T5603. Puts the toggling of locking membership into the editor so we get exceptions and all that.
I think the dialogue when you try to leave a project that is locked could be a little better maybe? Right now it just says "You can't leave" and "The membership is locked" more or less; should I surface a link to the policy stuff there too?
Test Plan:
- made a project, toggled the "lock" setting, observed stickiness and good transactions being made
- locked a project and tried to leave as a non-editor - got a dialogue letting me know i couldn't
- locked a project and tried to leave as an editor - left successfully
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: epriestley, Korvin
Maniphest Tasks: T5603
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10508
