Summary: Fixes T12213. Removes truncation and allows titles to be full width if needed.
Test Plan:
Chrome / Firefox / Safari on Mac, mobile and desktop widths.
{F2754679}
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: Korvin
Maniphest Tasks: T12213
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D17336
Summary:
Ref T4788. I thought I implemented this, but actualy didn't.
When we're in the "mid-sized" fallback mode (graph has more than 100 nodes, but not more than than 100 parents/children), don't actually draw the graph. It's almost always uninteresting and huge.
Instead, this just renders a list of direct parents, then the task, then the direct children, which is pretty straightforward.
Test Plan: Set limit to 5, saw mid-sized fallback graph with no actual graph drawing.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T4788
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D16816
Summary: Fixes T11676. Instead of trying to fit task titles to the display, truncate them and let the table scroll.
Test Plan:
Table now scrolls when cramped:
{F1843396}
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T11676
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D16583
Summary: Fixes T11392. If some tasks are restricted, we only have PHIDs for them, not objects. Just use the PHIDs instead.
Test Plan: {F1741335}
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T11392
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D16345
Summary:
Ref T4788. This gives us a new level of graceful degradation, so now we show:
- Zero through 100 connected tasks: whole graph.
- More than 100 connnected tasks, but fewer than 100 direct parents/subtasks: just parents and subtasks, with "..." to hint that the graph is cut off.
- More than 100 parents and children: just the "sorry, too much stuff" error message.
Test Plan: {F1740882}
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T4788
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D16344
Summary:
Fixes T11386. Ref T4788.
- Apparently fix weird strikethrough effect? Spooky!
- Provide a little icon hint in the left column about which tasks are direct parents/children, vs just reachable somehow. I don't think this is super useful/important, but seems maybe nice?
Test Plan: {F1740779}
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T4788, T11386
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D16342
Summary:
Ref T4788. One install has some particularly impressive task graphs which are thousands of nodes large.
The current graph is pretty broken in these cases. For now, just render a "too big to show" message. In the future, I'd plan to finesse this (e.g., show parents/children, show links to parents/children, etc).
Test Plan:
- Viewed a normal task.
- Set limit to 3, viewed a task with graph size 6, saw an error message.
- Viewed a revision stack graph (unaffected).
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T4788
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D16295
Summary:
Fixes T11274. When task titles are long, we currently wrap stuff and the trace graph renders real weird.
Instead, prevent taks/revision titles from wrapping/overflowing.
(This works in a slightly weird way, and `text-overflow: ellipsis;` has no apparent effect on any of the containers.)
Test Plan: {F1712394}
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T11274
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D16233
Summary: Ref T4788. It's not easy to tell at a glance which objects are open vs closed. Try to make that a bit more clear. This could probably use some more tweaking.
Test Plan: {F1708330}
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T4788
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D16219
Summary:
Ref T4788. As it turns out, our tasks are very tightly connected.
Instead of loading every parent/child task, then every parent/child of those tasks, etc., etc., only load tasks in the "same direction" that we're already heading.
For example, we load children of children, but not parents of children. And we load parents of parents, but not children of parents.
Basically we only go "up" and "down" now, but not "out" as much. This should reduce the gigantic multiple-thousand-node graphs currently shown in the UI.
I still discover the whole graph for revisiosn, because I think it's probably more useful and always much smaller. That might need adjustment too, though.
Test Plan: Seems fine locally??
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T4788
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D16218
Summary: Ref T4788. This seems reasonable locally, but not sure how it will feel on real data. Might need some tweaks, or might just be a terrible idea.
Test Plan: {F1708059}
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T4788
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D16214
Summary:
Ref T4788. This separates the revision graph view into a base class with core logic and a revision class with Differential-specific logic, so I can subclass it in Maniphest, etc., and try using it in other applications to show similar graphs.
Not sure if we'll stick with it, but even if we don't this makes the code a bit cleaner and gets custom rendering logic out of the RevisionViewController, which is nice.
Test Plan: Viewed revisions, saw the stack UI completely unchanged.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T4788
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D16213
