Summary: From IRC, this is sometimes helpful for debugging if there's a mailing list issue or something like that. For example, it can show "To" and "Cc".
Test Plan: Got some email, saw headers in it.
Reviewers: dctrwatson, btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D8708
Summary: Ref T4371. We can reuse more code for this "your stuff is empty" error, now, and benefit from global rate limiting and being able to reply to arbitrary addresses.
Test Plan: Sent valid, empty, and empty-ignored email via `mail_handler.php`, got appropriate actions/errors/states.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T4371
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D8701
Summary:
Ref T4371. Ref T4699. Fixes T3994.
Currently, we're very conservative about sending errors back to users. A concern I had about this was that mistakes could lead to email loops, massive amounts of email spam, etc. Because of this, I was pretty hesitant about replying to email with more email when I wrote this stuff.
However, this was a long time ago. We now have Message-ID deduplication, "X-Phabricator-Sent-This-Mail", generally better mail infrastructure, and rate limiting. Together, these mechanisms should reasonably prevent anything crazy (primarily, infinite email loops) from happening.
Thus:
- When we hit any processing error after receiving a mail, try to send the author a reply with details about what went wrong. These are limited to 6 per hour per address.
- Rewrite most of the errors to be more detailed and informative.
- Rewrite most of the errors in a user-facing voice ("You sent this mail..." instead of "This mail was sent..").
- Remove the redundant, less sophisticated code which does something similar in Differential.
Test Plan:
- Using `scripts/mail/mail_receiver.php`, artificially received a pile of mail.
- Hit a bunch of different errors.
- Saw reasonable error mail get sent to me.
- Saw other reasonable error mail get rate limited.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T3994, T4371, T4699
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D8692
Summary:
also try to centralize some of the command parsing logic. note that differential is still an exception here. it uses a whitelist-style regex. i think long-term we should have this for every app but changing it seemed too big for this diff.
Fixes T3937.
Test Plan:
echo '!assign btrahan' | ./bin/mail receive-test --as xerxes --to T22 ; echo '!claim' | ./bin/mail receive-test --as xerxes --to T22
unit tests passed, though my new one is silly
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: Korvin, epriestley, aran
Maniphest Tasks: T3937
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D7307
Summary:
Moves all remaining mail handling into ReplyHandlers.
Farewell, `getPhabricatorToInformation()`! You were a bad method and no one liked you.
Ref T1205.
Test Plan:
- Used test console to send mail to Revisions, Tasks, Conpherences and Commits (these all actually work).
- Used test console to send mail to Requests, Macros, Questions and Mocks (these accept the mail but don't do anything with it, but didn't do anything before either).
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T1205
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D5953
Summary: Ref T1205. Moves the handling logic for these email types to reply handlers.
Test Plan: Used test form to send conpherence and maniphest mail.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T1205
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D5945
Summary:
Ref T1205. Finally able to delete a big chunk of this nastiness.
Make MailReceivers responsible for validating senders. For object creation receivers (bugs, conpherences) this just means that users must not be disabled. For other receivers the senders must be able to see the objects, have the right hashes, etc., according to policy.
Test Plan: Added a bunch of test cases (everything except policy). Verified behavior via the Receive test console.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T1205
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D5943
Summary: Copies sender identification logic into MailReceivers and makes it basically sane. The mess we run into after this try/catch is terrifying so I'm avoiding actually getting rid of any of it quite yet. Ref T1205.
Test Plan: Added a bit of test coverage. Used Receiver test console to verify some additional behaviors.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: Afaque_Hussain, aran
Maniphest Tasks: T1205
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D5931
Summary: Adding Email reply support for external users.
Test Plan: Please let me know if I have approached it correctly. Had few doubts. Will proceed after your comments :)
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: aran, Korvin, AnhNhan, jennis.mekwan3
Maniphest Tasks: T1205
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D5912
Summary:
Ref T1205. Continuation of D5915.
Currently, `PhabricatorMetaMTAReceivedMail` has //all// the logic for routing mail. In particular:
- New mail receivers in applications must edit it.
- Mail receivers don't drop out when applications are uninstalled.
Applications have some logic in subclasses of `PhabricatorMailReplyHandler`, but this class is a bit of a mess. It is also heavily based on the assumption that mail receivers are objects (like revisions), but this is not true in at least two cases today (creating new tasks with `bugs@`, creating a new Conpherence thread) and likely other cases in the future (e.g., revision-by-mail).
Move this logic into a new `PhabricatorMailReceiver` classtree. This is similar to `PhabricatorMailReplyHandler` but a bit cleaner and more general. I plan to heavily reduce the responsibilities of `PhabricatorMailReplyHandler` or possibly eliminate it entirely.
For now, the new classtree doesn't do much of interest. The only behavioral change this diff causes is that Phabricator will now reject mail to an application when that application is uninstalled.
I also moved all the `ReplyHandler` classes into `mail/` directories in their respective applications.
Test Plan: Unit tests, used receive test to route mail to various objects.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: Afaque_Hussain, edward, aran
Maniphest Tasks: T1205
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D5922
Summary:
We/I broke a couple of things here recently (see D5911) and are doing some work here in general (see D5912, etc.).
Generally, this code is pretty oldschool and not especially well architected for modern application-oriented Phabricator. It hardcodes a lot of stuff which should be applications' responsibilites.
Take the first steps toward making it more solid to reduce the risk here. In particular:
- Factor out the "self mail" and "duplicate mail" checks and add unit tests.
- Make Message-ID hash handling automatic.
Test Plan: Ran unit tests.
Reviewers: btrahan, chad
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D5915
Summary:
Fixes T3181.
- Inbound `bugs@` mail is broken right now if it doesn't use the new external user stuff, because it calls `$user->getPhabricatorUser()` on an object which is already a `PhabricatorUser`. Instead, build the right `$user` object from the external user earlier on.
- Maniphest mail is nuking or otherwise awkwardly altering CCs. Make this work properly.
- Make sure "!unsubscribe" works correctly.
Test Plan: Sent `bugs@` mail. Sent CC mail. Sent "!unsubscribe" mail.
Reviewers: btrahan, chad
Reviewed By: chad
CC: aran, tido
Maniphest Tasks: T3181
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D5911
Summary: Added PHID_TYPE_XUSR to loadObjectsofType() of PhabricatorObjectHandle data. Was trying to solve the setActor() issue. Created a getPhabricator method in PhabricatorExternalAccount. When I try to set authorPHID using setAuthorPHID() in PhabricatorExternalAccount it's saying bad setter call, if I don't, then it's saying authorPHID can't be null. Sending you diff for comments on this.
Test Plan:
{F42523}
{F42525}
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: aran, Korvin, AnhNhan
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D5839
Summary: Using PhabricatorExternalAccount in place maniphest.default-public-author.
Test Plan:
Using receivemail to see if the a new entry is made in the 'phabircator_user.user_externalaccount' table. Few things, I noticed that phabricator creates table 'user_externalaccout'. And now it throws up error 'Unknown column 'dateCreated' in 'field list''. Awaiting your comments.
{F41370}
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: aran, Korvin, AnhNhan
Maniphest Tasks: T1205
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D5747
Summary: Mostly applies a new call spacing rule; also a few things that have slipped through via pull requests and such
Test Plan: `find src/ -type f -name '*.php' | xargs -n16 arc lint --output summary --apply-patches`
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
CC: aran
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D5002
Summary: I'm not super happy with the prettiness of the code, but I wasn't able to come up with a good way to clean it up. Happy for suggestions.
Test Plan: sent message to btrahan@phabricator.dev from gmail. Copied raw email and piped it to mail_handler.php -- it created a conpherence! Repeated but sent to btrahan and xerxes and noted that the conpherence was created for both users
Reviewers: epriestley, chad
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: aran, Korvin
Maniphest Tasks: T2431
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D4854
Summary: the editor methods are protected so just build a reply handler directly
Test Plan: push it live and try again
Reviewers: epriestley, chad
Reviewed By: chad
CC: aran, Korvin
Maniphest Tasks: T2399
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D4670
Summary: it doesn't work right now. updating this regex should fix it methinks
Test Plan: gotta push it live
Reviewers: chad, epriestley
Reviewed By: chad
CC: aran, Korvin
Maniphest Tasks: T2399
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D4663
Summary: Added a reply handler. A few problems -- first, I can't seem to get this to actually send me email so I haven't been able to reply (which I would have done by generating a reply, then copying the raw email into scripts/mail_handler.php). Second, the subject is often terrible on these emails -- unless the conpherence is named its something gross like "E4:" Third, on create I am noticing an error on array_combine() which I think is related to the need to write array_combine_not_broken or what have you I saw go by... (PhabricatorTransactionEditor does array_combine(xaction->getOldValue(), xaction->getOldValue()) and complains that the arrays are empty)
Test Plan: noted that /mail/ said mails were being sent
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: chad, aran, Korvin
Maniphest Tasks: T2399
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D4656
Summary: was doing some work in here and noticed this old crap lying around. T547 was last updated in December 2011 so I think its okay to delete these old mail hashes now.
Test Plan: careful code inspection, though I will be testing mail like whoa for the rest of the day probably
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: aran, Korvin
Maniphest Tasks: T547
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D4650
Summary: this can happen if you have Phabricator and email lists co-mingling such that Phabricator receives an email multiple times. we can prevent this from then spamming everyone or otherwise taking the action multiple times by storing a message id hash and dropping the message if we have more than one message that matches.
Test Plan: simulated sending the same email multiple times on the command line. noted only the first one made it through.
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: aran, Korvin
Maniphest Tasks: T1726
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D4328
Summary: array_filter to the rescue
Test Plan: mostly lots of reasoning (as opposed to making a fake user with a blank email address to reproduce)
Reviewers: epriestley, chad
Reviewed By: chad
CC: aran, Korvin
Maniphest Tasks: T2052
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D3927
Summary:
This commit doesn't change license of any file. It just makes the license implicit (inherited from LICENSE file in the root directory).
We are removing the headers for these reasons:
- It wastes space in editors, less code is visible in editor upon opening a file.
- It brings noise to diff of the first change of any file every year.
- It confuses Git file copy detection when creating small files.
- We don't have an explicit license header in other files (JS, CSS, images, documentation).
- Using license header in every file is not obligatory: http://www.apache.org/dev/apply-license.html#new.
This change is approved by Alma Chao (Lead Open Source and IP Counsel at Facebook).
Test Plan: Verified that the license survived only in LICENSE file and that it didn't modify externals.
Reviewers: epriestley, davidrecordon
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: aran, Korvin
Maniphest Tasks: T2035
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D3886
Summary:
a few things
- make the parent mailhandler class not send "blank body" error if you have attachments
- make both differential and maniphest append a list of attachments to the body if any exist
- BONUS - made the cc stuff work in Maniphest
Test Plan: I haven't actually tested this yet. :( i need to figure out how to send a mail with an attachment from the command-line and figured I'd serve this up first.
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: aran, Korvin
Maniphest Tasks: T2012
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D3868
Summary: When we receive an email, figure out if any of the other tos and ccs are users. If they are, pass their phids through the stach as "exclude phids" and exclude them from getting the email.
Test Plan: used the various applications (audit, differential, maniphest) and noted emails were sent as expected.
Reviewers: epriestley, vrana
Reviewed By: vrana
CC: aran, Korvin, vrana
Maniphest Tasks: T1676
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D3645
Summary: said differently, if the user included another to address or one or more cc's, don't send the error message email.
Test Plan: played around in the metamta test console and verified that blank replies generated the error handler.
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: aran, Korvin
Maniphest Tasks: T1643
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D3345
Summary:
- Assigning $cc_phids clobbers the correct value assigned on line 80.
- Remove stack trace noise, the trace is always meaningless and well-known.
- Actually show the original body.
Test Plan: Piped mail to the mail receiver and verified the errors didn't CC revision CCs, no longer had traces, and included the original raw text body.
Reviewers: btrahan, jungejason
Reviewed By: jungejason
CC: aran
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D2969
Summary:
- `kill_init.php` said "Moving 1000 files" - I hope that this is not some limit in `FileFinder`.
- [src/infrastructure/celerity] `git mv utils.php map.php; git mv api/utils.php api.php`
- Comment `phutil_libraries` in `.arcconfig` and run `arc liberate`.
NOTE: `arc diff` timed out so I'm pushing it without review.
Test Plan:
/D1234
Browsed around, especially in `applications/repository/worker/commitchangeparser` and `applications/` in general.
Auditors: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T1103
2012-06-01 12:32:44 -07:00
Renamed from src/applications/metamta/storage/receivedmail/PhabricatorMetaMTAReceivedMail.php (Browse further)
