Summary: Uses BLUE_PROPERTY on Recipients box, removes redundent properties since we render the badge itself already.
Test Plan: View a badge with and without a description.
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: Korvin
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15553
Summary: [WIP] Tossing this up for safety and to read through it. Need to test, update some of the other flows. This updates everything in Auth for new UI and modern conventions.
Test Plan: Loooots of random testing, new providers, edit providers, logging out, forgot password... more coming.
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: Korvin
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15550
Summary:
[WIP] Allows awarding a badge from a user profile. Unsure of the interactions here if a user can't award any badges, or if we should just hide this.
Fixes T10688
Fixes T10318
Test Plan: Award some badges. Steal them back.
Reviewers: lpriestley, epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: Korvin
Maniphest Tasks: T10318, T10688
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15544
Summary:
Ref T10537. Currently, Nuance has a `NuanceRequestor` object, intended to represent the external user who created content (e.g., a GitHub account or a Twitter account or whatever).
This object is currently almost unused, and its design predates Doorkeeper. In D15541, I chose to use doorkeeper objects instead of NuanceRequestor objects to represent requestors.
I don't currently anticipate a need for such an object, given that we have Doorkeeper. If we do need it in the future for some reason, it would be fairly easy to restore it, create a requestor type which wraps a Doorkeeper object, and then migrate. Not super thrilling to do that, but not a huge mess.
`NuanceItem` still has a `requestorPHID`, but this is now a less formal object PHID instead of a more formal Requestor-object PHID, and holds a doorkeeper exeternal object PHID for GitHub events.
Test Plan:
- Grepped for `nuancerequestor`.
- Ran `bin/storage upgrade -f`.
- Grepped for `requestor`, remaining uses of this term seem reasonable/correct.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T10537
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15546
Summary: This is kinda bad in terms of UI (It just makes a json of the thing and diffs that), but it's a start.
Test Plan: edit rule, create rule, add/remove/edit conditions, actions
Reviewers: #blessed_reviewers, epriestley
Reviewed By: #blessed_reviewers, epriestley
Subscribers: Korvin
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15542
Summary:
Ref T10538. Ref T10537. This creates PHIDs which represent GitHub users, and uses them as the actors for synchronized comments.
I've just made them Doorkeeper objects. There are three major kinds of objects they //could// possibly be:
- Nuance requestor objects.
- External account objects.
- Doorkeeper objects.
I don't think we actually need distinct nuance requestor objects. These don't really do anything right now, and were originally created before Doorkeeper. I think Doorkeeper is a superset of nuance requestor functionality, and better developed and more flexible.
Likewise, doorkeeper objects are much more flexible than external account objects, and it's nice to imagine that we can import from Twootfeed or whatever without needing to build full OAuth for it. I also like less stuff touching auth code, when possible.
Making these separate from external accounts does make it a bit harder to reconcile external users with internal users, but I think that's OK, and that it's generally desirable to show the real source of a piece of content. That is, if I wrote a comment on GitHub but also have a Phabricator account, I think it's good to show "epriestley (GitHub)" (the GitHub user) as the author, not "epriestley" (the Phabricator user). I think this is generally less confusing overall, and we can add more linkage later to make it clearer.
Test Plan:
{F1194104}
{F1194105}
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T10537, T10538
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15541
Summary: Ref T10538. This probably gets push events where GitHub does not recognize the author wrong, but I don't have any of those yet.
Test Plan: Added and ran unit tests.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T10538
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15540
Summary: Ref T10537. Add a new content source for Nuance. Prepare for better author attribution.
Test Plan: {F1194038}
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T10537
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15539
Summary: Fixes T10670, for users with exclusively archived badges, user profile should show "no badges" message instead of blank box
Test Plan: Award badge to user with no badges, archive badge, user profile should show "no badges" message under badges.
Reviewers: epriestley, #blessed_reviewers
Reviewed By: epriestley, #blessed_reviewers
Subscribers: Korvin
Maniphest Tasks: T10670
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15538
Summary:
Ref T10537.
- Let nuance items render custom curtain panels.
- Add a custom panel linking to the imported task, if one exists.
- Actually extract comments properly.
Test Plan:
Unit tests, plus:
{F1193800}
{F1193801}
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T10537
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15537
Summary: Ref T10677, Awarding/revoking badge should create a feed story on homepage with badge handle recipient handles
Test Plan: Award/revoke badge, open Feed, should see story with badge link and recipient links.
Reviewers: epriestley, #blessed_reviewers
Reviewed By: epriestley, #blessed_reviewers
Subscribers: Korvin
Maniphest Tasks: T10677
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15534
Summary: Ref T10677, awarding/revoking a badge should create timeline entries with titles that are more clear (excludes homepage feed stories)
Test Plan: Award/revoke a badge to single or multiple users. See timeline entries that reflect those actions.
Reviewers: epriestley, #blessed_reviewers
Reviewed By: epriestley, #blessed_reviewers
Subscribers: Korvin
Maniphest Tasks: T10677
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15533
Summary: Cleans up EditEngine, adds new layout to EditEngine and descendents
Test Plan: Test creating a new form, reordering, marking and unmarking defaults. View new forms.
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: Korvin
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15531
Summary: Adds headers, new layout to edit panels on Almanac.
Test Plan: Pull up each edit panel in sandbox, save form.
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: Korvin
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15527
Summary: Ref T8996, Convert badge recipients from Edges to actual BadgeAward objects
Test Plan: Create badge, award it to recipient. Make sure adding/removing recipients works. (Still need to migrate exisiting recipients to new table and need to create activity feed blurbs)
Reviewers: epriestley, #blessed_reviewers
Reviewed By: epriestley, #blessed_reviewers
Subscribers: chad, Korvin
Maniphest Tasks: T8996
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15014
Summary:
Fixes T10385. Two issues:
- `$show_blame` and `$show_color` were improperly swapped.
- Code to hide these columns got dropped somewhere, probably in my recent-ish rewrite.
Test Plan:
- Showed/hid blame.
- Showed/hid colors.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T10385
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15528
Summary:
Ref T10537. For Nuance, I want to introduce new sources (like "GitHub" or "GitHub via Nuance" or something) but this needs to modularize eventually.
Split ContentSource apart so applications can add new content sources.
Test Plan:
This change has huge surface area, so I'll hold it until post-release. I think it's fairly safe (and if it does break anything, the breaks should be fatals, not anything subtle or difficult to fix), there's just no reason not to hold it for a few hours.
- Viewed new module page.
- Grepped for all removed functions/constants.
- Viewed some transactions.
- Hovered over timestamps to get content source details.
- Added a comment via Conduit.
- Added a comment via web.
- Ran `bin/storage upgrade --namespace XXXXX --no-quickstart -f` to re-run all historic migrations.
- Generated some objects with `bin/lipsum`.
- Ran a bulk job on some tasks.
- Ran unit tests.
{F1190182}
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T10537
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15521
Summary: Updates the Harbormaster UI to match the new two column everywhere else.
Test Plan: Did best I could, tested builds, plans, steps, buildables. Unable to test lint/unit locally, I need to set that up. Kick the tires for me pls. :3
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: Korvin
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15523
Summary: Ref T10537. Show when an object is bridged to something external.
Test Plan: {F1190099}
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T10537
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15520
Summary:
Fixes T10665. See that task for discussion.
Because `$head_map` is not properly re-initialized for each ref we check, pushes which affect multiple branches (say, "A" and "B") can have information bleed from the first branch check to the second branch.
To trigger a problem behavior, you can push one commit which updates an existing branch, plus one commit which creates a new branch. If they process in the right order, the `$head_map` from the updated branch will bleed into the `$head_map` for the new branch and trigger an incorrect head split detection.
Test Plan:
- Pushed a set of changes which updated `branch-a` and created `branch-b`.
- Before change: improper detection of split heads.
- After change: clean push.
- Pushed a set of changes which split the head of `branch-d`.
- Correct detection of split heads.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T10665
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15522
Summary: Ref T10538. This makes us render better human-readable descriptions of more GitHub event types.
Test Plan: Ran unit tests.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T10538
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15516
Summary: Ref T10538. Very sloppy, but starting to sort of work. This sort of gets a piece of framework into a reasonable spot, next couple of diffs are going to be "extract comment text" and "show stuff in the UI" sorts of things.
Test Plan: {F1186726}
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T10538
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15511
Summary: This URI is currently a little whack.
Test Plan:
- With MFA, clicked "Edit Subscription" on a subscription.
- Clicked "Cancel".
- Before: Sent to `/phortune/phortune/edit/...`, a 404.
- After: Properly returned to subscription detail page.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15514
Summary: Moves everything I could find in Phortune to new UI layouts.
Test Plan: Tested every page I could get two, unclear how to test subscriptions.
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: Korvin
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15513
Summary:
Ref T10537. Generally, when users interact with Nuance items we'll dump a command into a queue and apply it in the background. This avoids race conditions with multiple users interacting with an item, which Nuance is more subject to than other applications because it has an import/external component.
The "sync" command doesn't actually do anything yet.
Test Plan: {F1186365}
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Subscribers: Luke081515.2
Maniphest Tasks: T10537
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15506
Summary: Ref T10538. This extracts and renders URIs for GitHub events so we can link to the original thing on GitHub.
Test Plan: {F1186332}
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T10538
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15505
Summary:
Ref T10537. This allows item types to expose item actions. Eventually these actions might be things like "promote to task", "tweet reply", "ban user forever", etc.
For now, provide a simple action which shows a raw item in a dialog.
Test Plan: {F1185573}
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Subscribers: Luke081515.2
Maniphest Tasks: T10537
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15504
Summary:
Ref T10537. These are objects which are bound to some external object, like a Maniphest task which is a representation of a GitHub issue.
This doesn't do much yet and may change, but my thinking is:
- I'm putting these on-object instead of on edges because I think we want to actively change the UI for them (e.g., clearly call out that the object is bridged) but don't want every page to need to do extra queries in the common case where zero bridged objects exist anywhere in the system.
- I'm making these one-to-one, more or less: an issue can't be bridged to a bunch of tasks, nor can a bunch of tasks be bridged to a single issue. Pretty sure this makes sense? I can't come up with any reasonable, realistic cases where you want a single GitHub issue to publish to multiple different tasks in Maniphest.
- Technically, one type of each bridgable object could be bridged, but I expect this to never actually occur. Hopefully.
Test Plan: Ran storage upgrade, loaded some pages.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Subscribers: Luke081515.2
Maniphest Tasks: T10537
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15502
Summary: This is failing locally for me, set to getViewer and pull up cart.
Test Plan: View cart with a description.
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: Korvin
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15509
Summary: Ref T9456. This makes everything work, except that CircleCI doesn't fetch tags which are not ancestors of branch heads.
Test Plan: Ran passing builds through CircleCI.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Subscribers: dpaola2, JustinTulloss
Maniphest Tasks: T9456
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D14288
Summary: Ref T9456. Some rough edges and we can't complete the build yet since I haven't written a webhook, but this mostly seems to be working.
Test Plan:
- Ran this build on some stuff.
- Ran a normal HTTP step build to make sure I didn't break that.
{F880301}
{F880302}
{F880303}
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Subscribers: JustinTulloss, joshma
Maniphest Tasks: T9456
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D14286
Summary: Ref T9456. This is just a convenience type for things like API tokens, to make it harder for users to make mistakes and keep SSH keys out of the dropdown for "choose your API token".
Test Plan: {F879820}
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Subscribers: joshuaspence
Maniphest Tasks: T9456
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D14284
Summary: Fixes T10648. This was goofed and always did a meaningless no-op slice -- I mucked it up while doing the disabled project stuff elsewhere.
Test Plan:
- Tagged something with 5 projects.
- Saw the list sliced to 4 (the limit) with "...".
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T10648
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15508
Summary:
Fixes T10646. When you load the page or click "New Condition" or "New Action", we try to add a condition and action with some default values.
Currently, the logic just sets everything to `null` or `'default'`. This technically works in Safari, but is less successful in Chrome. (I think Safari prevents you from picking an invalid value.)
Instead of relying on the browser to pick the right value, set the correct value explicitly.
Test Plan:
- Created a new rule in Chrome, Safari.
- Added fields and conditions in Chrome, Safari.
- Edited existing rules in Chrome, Safari.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T10646
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15507
Summary: Updates Spaces to new two column layout
Test Plan: Create a space, edit a space
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: Korvin
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15503
Summary: Fixes T10234. This usage is unusual, out of date, and has some bad interactions with engines and custom rules.
Test Plan:
- Added `CustomInlineCodeRule` from P1129 as an extension rule.
- Put a custom `<code> ... </code>` block in a Maniphest task description.
- Saw fatal as described in task; applied change; saw rule work properly.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T10234
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15501
Summary:
D9087 adds a nice typeahead but breaks the existing regex
search by quoting the pattern. Ideally, this change won't break the
typeahead, which as far as I can tell doesn't use the `pattern`
argument.
Test Plan:
Not yet.
RFC as to whether this change makes sense, will fix my local setup and resend if so.
Reviewers: epriestley, #blessed_reviewers
Reviewed By: epriestley, #blessed_reviewers
Subscribers: Korvin
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15500
Summary: Ref T7789. Implement proper detection for read-only requests. Previously, we assumed every request was read/write and required lots of permissions, but we don't need "Can Push" permission if you're only cloning/fetching/pulling.
Test Plan:
- Set push policy to "no one".
- Fetched, got clean data out of LFS.
- Tried to push, got useful error.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T7789
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15499
Summary: Fixes T10625.
Test Plan: Faked this locallly and it looked OK, I'll check the mail in production. :3333
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T10625
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15497
Summary:
- Fix spacing on InfoView inside collasped boxes
- Fix spacing on stacked PropertyLists in TwoColumn
- Fix spacing on Readmes on Tablets
- Fix unset variable on importing commits
Test Plan: Review each of the above cases.
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: Korvin
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15496
Summary: Ref T7789. This isn't the most perfect UI imaginable, but it's similar to what GitHub does and seems reasonable.
Test Plan:
{F1180271}
{F1180272}
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T7789
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15494
Summary: Ref T7789. Make sure these get cleaned up when a repository is destroyed.
Test Plan:
- Created a new repository.
- Pushed some LFS data to it.
- Used `bin/remove destroy` to nuke it.
- Verified the LFS stuff was cleaned up and the underlying files were destroyed (`SELECT * FROM repository_gitlfsref`, etc).
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T7789
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15493
Summary:
Ref T7789. Ref T10604. This implements the `upload` action, which streams file data into Files.
This makes Git LFS actually work, at least roughly.
Test Plan:
- Tracked files in an LFS repository.
- Pushed LFS data (`git lfs track '*.png'; git add something.png; git commit -m ...; git push`).
- Pulled LFS data (`git checkout master^; rm -rf .git/lfs; git checkout master; open something.png`).
- Verified LFS refs show up in the gitlfsref table.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T7789, T10604
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15492
Summary: I think I like this better -- but maybe right-aligned?
Test Plan:
{F1180295}
{F1180296}
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15495
Summary:
Ref T7789. This implements:
- A new table to store the `<objectHash, filePHID>` relationship between Git LFS files and Phabricator file objects.
- A basic response to `batch` commands, which return actions for a list of files.
Test Plan:
Ran `git lfs push origin master`, got a little further than previously:
```
epriestley@orbital ~/dev/scratch/poemslocal $ git lfs push origin master
Git LFS: (2 of 1 files) 174.24 KB / 87.12 KB
Git LFS operation "upload/b7e0aeb82a03d627c6aa5fc1bbfd454b6789d9d9affc8607d40168fa18cf6c69" is not supported by this server.
Git LFS operation "upload/b7e0aeb82a03d627c6aa5fc1bbfd454b6789d9d9affc8607d40168fa18cf6c69" is not supported by this server.
```
With `GIT_TRACE=1`, this shows the batch part of the API going through.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T7789
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15489
Summary:
adds the `{{PHID....}}` rule. Should mostly be useful in UI code that refers to Objects.
It doesn't add any mention links/transactions.
Test Plan: Comment with this, see email (plain + html) and comment box.
Reviewers: #blessed_reviewers, epriestley
Reviewed By: #blessed_reviewers, epriestley
Subscribers: Korvin
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15488
Summary: This updates (all?) of Diffusion/Audit to new UI, included edit and other extra form pages. It's fairly complete but I don't know all the nooks and crannies so to speak to fully verify I didn't mess anything up.
Test Plan: Tested creating new repositories, browsing, searching, auditing. Need more eyes.
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: Korvin
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15487
Summary:
Ref T7789. This builds on top of `git-lfs-authenticate` to detect LFS requests, read LFS tokens, and route them to a handler which can do useful things.
This handler promptly drops them on the floor with an error message.
Test Plan:
Here's a transcript showing the parts working together so far:
- `git-lfs` connects to the server with SSH, and gets told how to connect with HTTP to do uploads.
- `git-lfs` uses HTTP, and authenticates with the tokens properly.
- But the server tells it to go away, and that it doesn't support anything, so the operation ultimately fails.
```
$ GIT_TRACE=1 git lfs push origin master
12:45:56.153913 git.c:558 trace: exec: 'git-lfs' 'push' 'origin' 'master'
12:45:56.154376 run-command.c:335 trace: run_command: 'git-lfs' 'push' 'origin' 'master'
trace git-lfs: Upload refs origin to remote [master]
trace git-lfs: run_command: git rev-list --objects master --not --remotes=origin
trace git-lfs: run_command: git cat-file --batch-check
trace git-lfs: run_command: git cat-file --batch
trace git-lfs: run_command: 'git' config -l
trace git-lfs: tq: starting 3 transfer workers
trace git-lfs: tq: running as batched queue, batch size of 100
trace git-lfs: prepare upload: b7e0aeb82a03d627c6aa5fc1bbfd454b6789d9d9affc8607d40168fa18cf6c69 lfs/dog1.jpg 1/1
trace git-lfs: tq: sending batch of size 1
trace git-lfs: ssh: local@localvault.phacility.com git-lfs-authenticate diffusion/18/poems.git upload
trace git-lfs: api: batch 1 files
trace git-lfs: HTTP: POST http://local.phacility.com/diffusion/POEMS/poems.git/info/lfs/objects/batch
trace git-lfs: HTTP: 404
trace git-lfs: HTTP: {"message":"Git LFS operation \"objects\/batch\" is not supported by this server."}
trace git-lfs: HTTP:
trace git-lfs: api: batch not implemented: 404
trace git-lfs: run_command: 'git' config lfs.batch false
trace git-lfs: tq: batch api not implemented, falling back to individual
trace git-lfs: ssh: local@localvault.phacility.com git-lfs-authenticate diffusion/18/poems.git upload b7e0aeb82a03d627c6aa5fc1bbfd454b6789d9d9affc8607d40168fa18cf6c69
trace git-lfs: api: uploading (b7e0aeb82a03d627c6aa5fc1bbfd454b6789d9d9affc8607d40168fa18cf6c69)
trace git-lfs: HTTP: POST http://local.phacility.com/diffusion/POEMS/poems.git/info/lfs/objects
trace git-lfs: HTTP: 404
trace git-lfs: HTTP: {"message":"Git LFS operation \"objects\" is not supported by this server."}
trace git-lfs: HTTP:
trace git-lfs: tq: retrying 1 failed transfers
trace git-lfs: ssh: local@localvault.phacility.com git-lfs-authenticate diffusion/18/poems.git upload b7e0aeb82a03d627c6aa5fc1bbfd454b6789d9d9affc8607d40168fa18cf6c69
trace git-lfs: api: uploading (b7e0aeb82a03d627c6aa5fc1bbfd454b6789d9d9affc8607d40168fa18cf6c69)
trace git-lfs: HTTP: POST http://local.phacility.com/diffusion/POEMS/poems.git/info/lfs/objects
trace git-lfs: HTTP: 404
trace git-lfs: HTTP: {"message":"Git LFS operation \"objects\" is not supported by this server."}
trace git-lfs: HTTP:
Git LFS: (0 of 1 files) 0 B / 87.12 KB
Git LFS operation "objects" is not supported by this server.
Git LFS operation "objects" is not supported by this server.
```
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Subscribers: eadler
Maniphest Tasks: T7789
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15485
Summary:
Ref T7789. This implements a (probably) usable "git-lfs-authenticate" on top of the new temporary token infrastructure.
This won't actually do anything yet, since nothing reads the tokens.
Test Plan:
```
$ ./bin/ssh-exec --phabricator-ssh-user admin --ssh-command 'git-lfs-authenticate'
phabricator-ssh-exec: Expected `git-lfs-authenticate <path> <operation>`, but received too few arguments.
```
```
$ ./bin/ssh-exec --phabricator-ssh-user admin --ssh-command 'git-lfs-authenticate x'
phabricator-ssh-exec: Unrecognized repository path "x". Expected a path like "/diffusion/X/" or "/diffusion/123/".
```
```
$ ./bin/ssh-exec --phabricator-ssh-user admin --ssh-command 'git-lfs-authenticate diffusion/22'
Exception: Expected `git-lfs-authenticate <path> <operation>`, but received too few arguments.
```
```
$ ./bin/ssh-exec --phabricator-ssh-user admin --ssh-command 'git-lfs-authenticate diffusion/22 y'
Exception: Git LFS operation "y" is not supported by this server.
```
```
$ ./bin/ssh-exec --phabricator-ssh-user admin --ssh-command 'git-lfs-authenticate diffusion/22 upload'
{"header":{"Authorization":"Basic QGdpdC1sZnM6NmR2bDVreWVsaXNuMmtnNXBtbnZwM3VlaWhubmI1bmI="},"href":"http:\/\/local.phacility.com\/diffusion\/22\/new-callsign-free-repository.git\/info\/lfs"}
```
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T7789
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15482
Summary:
Ref T10560. Reverts D15460. See that task for discussion: we dug up some more information to explain the behavior, and this key was just sort of sidestepping an analyze/cardinality estimate issue on the index.
With proper cardinality estimates it shouldn't be used, so just nuke it.
Test Plan: Ran `bin/storage adjust`, saw key drop.
Reviewers: eadler, chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T10560
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15486
Summary: Fixes T10603. This is the last of the ad-hoc temporary tokens.
Test Plan:
- Used a file token.
- Viewed type in {nav Config > Temporary Tokens}.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T10603
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15481
Summary: Ref T10603. Swap these over and give them nice UI strings.
Test Plan:
- Refreshed a Twitter OAuth link.
- Unlinked and re-linked a Twitter account.
- Viewed the new type in {nav Config > Temporary Tokens}.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T10603
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15480
Summary:
Ref T10603. We have a couple of sort of ad-hoc tokens, so start formalizing them. First up is MFA tokens.
Also adds a new config module panel for these.
Test Plan:
- Added MFA.
- Added MFA, intentionally fumbled the input, completed the workflow.
- Removed MFA.
- Viewed tokens, saw MFA sync tokens.
- Viewed new module config panel.
{F1177014}
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T10603
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15479
Summary:
Ref T10603. This makes minor updates to temporary tokens:
- Rename `objectPHID` (which is sometimes used to store some other kind of identifier instead of a PHID) to `tokenResource` (i.e., which resource does this token permit access to?).
- Add a `userPHID` column. For LFS tokens and some other types of tokens, I want to bind the token to both a resource (like a repository) and a user.
- Add a `properties` column. This makes tokens more flexible and supports custom behavior (like scoping LFS tokens even more tightly).
Test Plan:
- Ran `bin/storage upgrade -f`, got a clean upgrade.
- Viewed one-time tokens.
- Revoked one token.
- Revoked all tokens.
- Performed a one-time login.
- Performed a password reset.
- Added an MFA token.
- Removed an MFA token.
- Used a file token to view a file.
- Verified file token was removed after viewing file.
- Linked my account to an OAuth1 account (Twitter).
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T10603
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15478
Summary:
Ref T10603. This converts existing hard-codes to modular constants.
Also removes one small piece of code duplication.
Test Plan:
- Performed one-time logins.
- Performed a password reset.
- Verified temporary tokens were revoked properly.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T10603
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15476
Summary:
Ref T10603. For LFS, we need to issue a new type of temporary token.
This makes the temporary token code modular so applications can add new token types without modifying the Auth application.
(I'm moving slowly here because it impacts authentication.)
Test Plan:
- Used `bin/auth recover` to get a one-time token from the CLI.
- Used "Forgot your password?" to get a one-time token from the web UI.
- Followed the web UI token to initiate a password reset, prompting generation of a password token.
- Viewed these tokens in the web UI:
{F1176908}
- Revoked a token.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T10603
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15475
Summary: Fixes T10591. This was accidentally reverted in 148a50e48b, probably when resolvign a merge/rebase.
Test Plan: Will push to production.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T10591
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15474
Summary: Updates Drydock to use two column + curtain layouts.
Test Plan: Tested what I could get to, need @epriestley to run this locally for edge cases.
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: Korvin, epriestley
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15467
Summary:
First pass at converting Differential, I likely have some buggy-poos but thought I'd toss this up now in case very bad bugs present.
To do:
- Need to put status back on Hovercards
- "Diff Detail" probably needs a better design
Test Plan: Looking at lots of diffs, admittedly I dont have harbormaster, etc, running locally. Checked Diffusion for Table of Content changes on small and large commits.
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: Korvin
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15463
Summary: Fixes T10539. When building mail targets, we fail to preserve whether a recipient was originally "To" or "Cc", and just move everyone to "To".
Test Plan:
Added a comment to a task with a "To" user and a "Cc" user, with `metamta.placeholder-to-recipient` set and `metamta.one-mail-per-recipient` set.
Got mail with me Cc'd as the Cc'd user:
{F1172020}
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T10539
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15465
Summary: Fixes T10546. Some day, decades from now, we can revisit this when we iterate on Phrequent. Just don't regress for no real reason in the meantime, since it's easy enough to keep it working in reasonable shape.
Test Plan: {F1169096}
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T10546
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15461
Summary:
Ref T10563. This isn't a complete fix, but should make viewing complex inline threads a little more manageable.
This just tries to put stuff in thread order instead of in pure chronological order. We can likely improve the display treatment -- this is a pretty minimal approach, but should improve clarity.
Test Plan:
T10563 has a "before" shot. Here's the "after":
{F1169018}
This makes it a bit easier to follow the conversations.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T10563
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15459
Summary:
Ref T10493.
- Call this action "Unassigned" instead of "Up For Grabs", since the latter implies that it's OK for anyone to grab it, which is a social/context thing that we probably shouldn't assume.
- Show who a task was previously assigned to in the transaction.
The text is a little clunky, yell if you've got a better wording? Or maybe I'll come up with something.
Test Plan: {F1166299}
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Subscribers: cburroughs
Maniphest Tasks: T10493
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15454
Summary:
Ref T10560. I don't fully understand what MySQL is doing here, but it looks like this key improves the problematic dataset in practice.
(It makes sense that this key helps, I'm just not sure why the two separate keys and the UNION ALL are so bad.)
This key isn't hugely expensive to add, so we can try it and see if there are still issues.
Test Plan: Ran `bin/storage adjust`, saw key added to table. Used `SHOW CREATE TABLE ...` to verify the key exists. Used `EXPLAIN SELECT ...` to make sure MySQL actually uses it.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T10560
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15460
Summary: I think this works?
Test Plan:
i am wizard
{F1168808}
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15457
Summary: Adds a date with the author name on the Authored By panel in Maniphest. A basic treatment, will see how it feels.
Test Plan: Look at a few tasks
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: Korvin
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15456
Summary:
To improve the performance of Herald, we attempt to generate the value for each field (e.g., a task title) only once.
For most field values this is cheap, but for some (like a commit's branches) it can be quite expensive. We only want to pay this cost once, so we cache field values.
However, D12957 accidentally added a check where we bypass the cache and generate the value for every field, before reading the cache. This causes us to generate each field for every rule that uses it, plus one extra time.
Instead, use the cache for this check, too. Also allow the cache to cache `null`, since it can be expensive to generate `null` even though the value isn't too interesting.
The value of this early hit isn't even used (we only care if it throws or not).
Test Plan:
- Wrote a rule like "if any condition matches: branches contain a, branches contain b, branches contain c".
- Put `phlog(new Exception())` in `DiffusionCommitBranchesHeraldField`.
- Before patch, saw `bin/repository reparse --herald <any commit>` compute branches three times.
- After patch, saw only one computation.
- Verified field values in the transcript view
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15451
Summary:
Ref T10538.
This is a tiny fraction of the API. GitHub has 25 primary event types; we currently partially parse 3 of them. GitHub has 17 issue event types; we currently partially parse 12.
Test Plan: Ran `arc unit`.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T10538
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15448
Summary:
Ref T10538. This sets up a Doorkeeper bridge for GitHub issues, and pulls issues from GitHub to create ExternalObject references.
Broadly, does nothing useful.
Test Plan: Put a `var_dump()` in there somewhere and saw it probably do something when running `bin/nuance update --item 44`.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T10538
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15447
Summary:
Ref T10538. The primary GitHub event activity stream does not report minor events (labels, milestones, etc).
GitHub has a second, similar activity stream which does report these events (the "Issues Events API").
Use two separate cursors: one consumes the primary stream; the second consumes the events stream.
One possible issue with this is that we may write events in a different order than they occurred, so GitHub shows "comment, label, close" but we show "comment, close, label" or similar. This is probably OK because the secondary API doesn't seem to have any very important events (e.g., it's probably fine if label changes are out-of-order), but we can conceivably put some buffer stage in between the two if it's an issue.
Test Plan: {F1164894}
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T10538
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15446
Summary: Fixes T10545. Converts layout to two column.
Test Plan: Review a few project manage pages, see new layout and flag ability.
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: Korvin
Maniphest Tasks: T10545
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15450
Summary: Ref T10545, this brings flags back? and converts the layout to two column w/curtain
Test Plan: View a few manage pages.
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: Korvin
Maniphest Tasks: T10545
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15449
Summary:
Ref T10537. This adds an update daemon for pulling item data (e.g., figuring out who the author of a GitHub comment is) and routing items (e.g., sending them to a queue or applying them directly to a task).
Also adds `bin/nuance update --item X` for doing this manually for debugging.
And adds item types, for specializing item behavior. Previously, sources completely dictated item behavior, but I think we want something a little more flexible.
Test Plan:
- This still does nothing.
- Ran `bin/nuance update --item 15`.
- Saw an item route to a default queue.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T10537
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15441
Summary: This inverts colors and icons a bit, so they're not as harsh. So instead of a dark green item with white icon, its now light green with a dark green icon. I've also changed all text and comment boxes to be "grey" visually to separate out the UI from converation/actions. Give it a spin and let me know how this feels. I still need to update the comment UI.
Test Plan:
UIExamples, lots of various tasks and diffs.
{F1163837}
{F1163839}
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: Korvin
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15442
Summary:
Ref T10537. Ref T10538. This polls the GitHub events API and creates Nuance items from the raw data.
It does nothing useful with them.
Test Plan:
- Polled GitHub.
- Saw some items get created.
- X-Poll-Interval seemed to work.
- ETag seemed to work.
- Recognizing when we hit items we've already seen seemed to work.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T10537, T10538
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15440
Summary: Cleaner UI, moved visit to be button.
Test Plan: Make a phurl about cats, click on it.
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: Korvin
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15385
Summary:
Ref T10537. More infrastructure:
- Put a `bin/nuance` in place with `bin/nuance import`. This has no useful behavior yet.
- Allow sources to be searched by substring. This supports `bin/nuance import --source whatever` so you don't have to dig up PHIDs.
Test Plan:
- Applied migrations.
- Ran `bin/nuance import --source ...` (no meaningful effect, but works fine).
- Searched for sources by substring in the UI.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T10537
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15436
Summary:
Ref T10537. Some sources (like the future "GitHub Repository" source) need to poll remotes.
- Provide a mechanism for sources to emit import cursors.
- Hook them into the trigger daemon so they'll fire periodically.
- Provide some storage.
This diff does nothing useful or interesting, and is pure infrastructure.
Test Plan:
- Ran `bin/storage upgrade -f`, no adjustment issues.
- Poked around Nuance.
- Ran the trigger daemon, verified it didn't crash and checked for Nuance stuff to do.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T10537
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15435
Summary: Ref T10537. Converts sources to EditEngine.
Test Plan:
- Created a new source.
- Edited an existing source.
- Submitted a complaint with the complaint form.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T10537
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15434
Summary: See D15432. There, we can use this test to check if the user //could// reassign the task by using "Edit Form" or the stacked actions, so any dedicated "claim" element is consistent with the other permissions.
Test Plan:
- Added a `var_dump($can_reassign)` after the call.
- Saw `true`.
- Edited the edit form, locked and disabled "Assigned To".
- Saw `false`.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15433
Summary: Ref T10537. Update queue editing to use EditEngine.
Test Plan:
- Created a new queue.
- Edited an existing queue.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T10537
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15431
