Summary: Fixes T7392. When filtering blocked/blocking Maniphest tasks, don't consider closed tasks.
Test Plan:
# Created `T1` and `T2` with `T2 depends on T1`.
# Marked `T1` as resolved.
# Searched for tasks "blocked by other tasks" and noted that `T2` wasn't in the result set.
Reviewers: btrahan, #blessed_reviewers, epriestley
Reviewed By: #blessed_reviewers, epriestley
Subscribers: Korvin, epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T7392
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D11911
Summary: Fixes T7367
Test Plan: I guess noone every used this? Click on mobile menu, get not a 404.
Reviewers: btrahan, epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: Korvin, epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T7367
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D11880
Summary:
Ref T7185. These settings shouldn't be unlocked anywhere. Specifically:
- `reply-handler`: These are on the way out.
- `reply-handler-domain`: Also hopefully on the way out; locked because a compromised administrator account can redirect replies.
- `phabricator.cookie-prefix`: Not dangerous per se, but an admin could have a hard time fixing this if they changed it by accident since their session would become invalid immediately.
Test Plan: Browsed Config.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T7185
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D11764
Summary: Fixes T7088. Mainly this updates the documentation but I also snuck in tweaking how the domain reply handler is built. This does two main things -- makes the behavior consistent as some applications who didn't override this behavior would send out emails with reply tos AND makes it easier for us to deprecate the custom domain thing on a per application basis, which is just silly. On that note, the main documentation doesn't get into how this can be overridden, though I left in that mini blurb on the config setting itself. We could deprecate this harder and LOCK things if you want as well.
Test Plan: read docs, looked good. reasoned through re-factor
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: Korvin, epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T7088
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D11725
Summary: I //think// Maniphest has switched to real edges now.
Test Plan: N/A
Reviewers: epriestley, #blessed_reviewers
Reviewed By: epriestley, #blessed_reviewers
Subscribers: epriestley
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D11716
Summary: Adds core and apps grouping to configuration options, makes it somewhat easier to browse config options.
Test Plan: Set each option, review list. Breakdown is nearly 50/50 apps/core.
Reviewers: btrahan, epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: Korvin, epriestley
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D11722
Summary: Fixes T7118. This does the basic "filter the list" thing, though it ends up being a little manual since I guess this hasn't come up before? There is also potential weird behavior if the user was using an app and lost access to it - they will have nothing selected on edit - but I think this is actually correct behavior in this circumstance.
Test Plan:
used a user who couldn't get access to the "quick create" apps and noted that the dropdown list on dashboard panel create was missing the expected engines
ran `arc unit --everything` to verify abstract method implemented everywhere
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: Korvin, epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T7118
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D11687
Summary: Fixes T7164. Adds some details about how the statuses will show up in the UI.
Test Plan: Read the text
Reviewers: epriestley, chad
Reviewed By: chad
Subscribers: Korvin, epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T7164
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D11686
Summary: Fixes T7094 (last of many revisions). Its important to do this filtering ASAP so that users can't deduce the identify of an unknown / invisible project.
Test Plan: executed a query for tasks in project foo using user bar. using user foo, lock user bar out of project foo. reissued the query and saw "no data" as well as "restricted project" in the project typeahead.
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: Korvin, epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T7094
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D11660
Summary: Ref T7094. This is a bit involved and should be tackled as a separate effort. The good news is policy still saves the day here but (back to the bad news) its a bad user experience.
Test Plan: NA, just a comment
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: Korvin, epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T7094
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D11658
Summary: Revamps Profile to be like Projects, a mini portal and side nav with icons.
Test Plan: Viewed my own profile, as well as others. Test seeing my commits, tasks, diffs, and upcoming events. Checked mobile navigation.
Reviewers: btrahan, epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: Korvin, epriestley
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D11547
Summary: This sets an icon for each config, makes it easier to scan.
Test Plan:
Reload Config page, see all new icons
{F281089}
Reviewers: btrahan, epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: Korvin, epriestley
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D11619
Summary: Clean up the error view styling.
Test Plan:
Tested as many as I could find, built additional tests in UIExamples
{F280452}
{F280453}
Reviewers: btrahan, epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: hach-que, Korvin, epriestley
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D11605
Summary: Fixes T3404 (post D11565), fixes T5952. This infrastructure has been getting deployed against Maniphest and its time to get these other two applications going on it.
Test Plan: created an email address for paste and used `./bin/mail receive-test` ; a paste was successfully created
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: Korvin, epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T5952, T3404
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D11570
Summary: due to typehints, passing null is going to barf here. Ref D11564, ref T5039.
Test Plan: made an edit to a task from the web ui and it didnt fatal
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: Korvin, epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T5039
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D11571
Summary:
Fixes T5039. The trick / possibly lame part here is we only match 1 application email and its undefined which one. e.g. if a user emails us at address x, y, and z only one of those will pick up the mail. Ergo, don't let users define non-sensical herald conditions like "matches all". Also document what I think was non-intuitive about the code with an inline comment; we have to return an array with just a phid from an object and out of context it feels very "what the...???"
Note this needs to be deployed to other applications still, but I think its okay to close T5039 aggressively here since its done from a user story perspective.
Test Plan: set up a herald rule to flag tasks created as blue via app email x. sent an email to x via `bin/mail receive-test` and verified the task had the blue flag
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: Korvin, epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T5039
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D11564
Summary: Ref T5952. This adds support for a "default author" and deploys it on Maniphest.
Test Plan: used augmented (by this diff) bin/mail receive-test to test creation via an application email with a default author configured and no author specified. a task was created with the author as the default author i configured.
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: Korvin, epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T5952
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D11446
Summary:
Ref T7055. Apparently we just never had one? I feel like I'm crazy. But I can't find any trace in the logs.
I'm actually not 100% sold on this being better because it's a color glyph on OSX and those feel a little out of place / tacky to me compared to the black-and-white ones. So I'd be fine with just leaving it off, too. Clearly not important if no one noticed it until I caught it in T7055.
Test Plan: {F276917}
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T7055
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D11524
Summary: Select a similar or better FontAwesome icon to represent each application
Test Plan: Visual inspection
Reviewers: epriestley, btrahan
Subscribers: hach-que, Korvin, epriestley
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D11489
Summary: Ref T5952, T3404. This lays the basic plumbing for how this will work, all the way to deploying on Maniphest. Aside from what is mentioned on T5952, I think page(s) on editing application emails could use a little more helpful text about what's going on, similar to how the config page that's getting deprecated works.
Test Plan: ran migration and noted my create email address migrated successfully. used bin/mail to make a task. added another email and used bin/mail to make a task. deleted an email. edited an email. invoked various error states and they all looked good.
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: Korvin, epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T3404, T5952
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D11418
Summary: In Maniphest, we provide an additional caption shortcut if you can create projects, which has no use if you cant. Fixes T6969
Test Plan: Check page with and without a user's capability.
Reviewers: btrahan, epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: Korvin, epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T6969
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D11390
Summary:
Fixes T5352. This is very useful for finding things that should be easy to do ("not blocked") as well as things that are important to do ("blocking"). I have wanted to check out the latter case in our installation, though no promises on what I would end up actually doing from that search result list. =D
I also think supporting something like T6638 is reasonable but the UI seems trickier to me; its some sort of task tokenizer, which I don't think we've done before?
Test Plan: toggled various search options and got reasonable results. When i clicked conflicting things like "blocking" and "not blocking" verified it was like I had not clicked anything at all.
Reviewers: chad, epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: Korvin, epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T5352
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D11306
Summary: Adds more user friendly copy to the result list
Test Plan: Test on a project with and without tasks.
Reviewers: btrahan, epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: Korvin, epriestley
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D11352
Summary: Ref T5752, moves mobile action menus to the object box instead of crumbs.
Test Plan: View action menus at tablet, desktop, and mobile break points. Verify clicking buttons works as expected opening menu.
Reviewers: btrahan, epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: Korvin, epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T5752
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D11340
Summary:
Fixes T6932. Fixes some issues from D11303.
- When claiming a task, if it was previously unassigned, we would try to CC `null`.
- When claiming a task, if the current owner was already CC'd, the viewer would incorrectly be warned about all subscribers being CC'd.
Test Plan:
- Claimed an unclaimed task.
- Claimed a task with owner CC'd.
Reviewers: btrahan, joshuaspence
Reviewed By: joshuaspence
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T6932
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D11336
Summary: Fixes T6732. Fix is to stop trying to catch the error in the controller and let the editor do its job.
Test Plan: tried to add an existing subscriber and got an error message about how that wouldn't do anything
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: Korvin, epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T6732
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D11303
Summary: Fixes T6179. This makes the interaction where users remove a task from a workboard much more pleasant.
Test Plan: Loaded up workboard for "A Project". Edited tasks and if / when I removed "A Project" they disappeared on save.
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: Korvin, epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T6179
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D11259
Summary: Ref T6822.
Test Plan: Visual inspection. These methods are only called from within the `PhabricatorApplicationSearchEngine` class.
Reviewers: #blessed_reviewers, epriestley
Reviewed By: #blessed_reviewers, epriestley
Subscribers: Korvin, epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T6822
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D11242
Summary: Fixes T6555, The following should 404: /maniphest/task/create/?parent=asdf, /maniphest/task/create/?parent=0, /maniphest/task/create/?parent=999999 (where T999999 does not exist)
Test Plan: Navigate to /maniphest/task/create/?parent=asdf or /maniphest/task/create/?parent=0 or /maniphest/task/create/?parent=999999 (where T999999 does not exist). See 404.
Reviewers: #blessed_reviewers, epriestley
Reviewed By: #blessed_reviewers, epriestley
Subscribers: Korvin, epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T6555
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D11258
Summary: When updating the status of a task via commit, transaction should show responsible commit and status update if it was changed.
Test Plan: Push a commit "Fixes Txx", transaction should include status update and commit number.
Reviewers: #blessed_reviewers, epriestley
Reviewed By: #blessed_reviewers, epriestley
Subscribers: Korvin, epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T6637
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D11230
Summary: CLosed is a pretty important state and black tends to blend in a bit. This bumps to an alternate color to improve ability to scan and know state of objects.
Test Plan:
Review a number of closed objects. I will follow up with another diff on 'Archived' colors.
{F261895}
Reviewers: btrahan, epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: Korvin, epriestley
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D11222
Summary: This class is no longer used after D6673.
Test Plan: `grep`
Reviewers: #blessed_reviewers, epriestley
Reviewed By: #blessed_reviewers, epriestley
Subscribers: Korvin, epriestley
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D11167
Summary: This class is no longer used after D10965.
Test Plan: `grep`
Reviewers: btrahan, epriestley, #blessed_reviewers
Reviewed By: epriestley, #blessed_reviewers
Subscribers: Korvin, epriestley
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D11133
Summary: Modernize remaining edges to subclass `PhabricatorEdgeType`. Largely based on D11045.
Test Plan: Browsed around and performed various actions include subscribing, unsubscribing and watching.
Reviewers: #blessed_reviewers, epriestley
Reviewed By: #blessed_reviewers, epriestley
Subscribers: epriestley
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D11116
Summary:
Removes an unused PhabricatorFeedStory Parameter from all getTitleForFeed() and getApplicationTransactionTitleForFeed() functions.
Ref D11088 Ref T6545
Test Plan: ran all unit tests and viewed some dashboard feeds
Reviewers: #blessed_reviewers, epriestley
Reviewed By: #blessed_reviewers, epriestley
Subscribers: Korvin, epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T6545
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D11146
Summary: Modernize Pholio edges to subclass `PhabricatorEdgeType`. Largely based on D11045.
Test Plan: Attached a mock to a task, observed the expected comment in the transaction view (both ways).
Reviewers: epriestley, #blessed_reviewers
Reviewed By: epriestley, #blessed_reviewers
Subscribers: Korvin, epriestley
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D11113
Summary: This method has been deprecated for a long time (see D2887 and D6336).
Test Plan:
```lang=bash
> echo '{}' | arc --conduit-uri=http://phabricator.local call-conduit 'maniphest.find'
Waiting for JSON parameters on stdin...
{"error":"ERR-CONDUIT-CALL","errorMessage":"ERR-CONDUIT-CALL: ","response":null}
```
Reviewers: #blessed_reviewers, epriestley
Reviewed By: #blessed_reviewers, epriestley
Subscribers: Korvin, epriestley
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D11117
Summary:
Ref T4411
I'm not quite sure if this is the right place for this as it will be difficult to provide proper user feedback of why we removed a particular subscriber.
Is the ApplicationTransactionEditor generally the right place to extract mentioned phids in comments?
On the other hand in some cases we cannot really give user feedback why a user was not subscribed (e.g.: commits & diffs)
Adding a diff to a repo where the user mentioned has no view permissions the subscriber is currently still added. Still would have to find where this is donet...
Any other places?
Unrelated: Is there any way to remove a subscriber from a commit/audit ?
Test Plan:
- Edited tasks with the mentioned user having view permissions to this specific task and without
- Raised concern with a commit and commented on the audit with the user having view permissions to the repo and without
- Added a commit to a repo with and without the mentioned user having permissions
- Mention a user in a task & commit comment with and without permissions
- Mentioning a user in a diff description & comments with and without permissions to the specific diff
Reviewers: chad, #blessed_reviewers, epriestley
Reviewed By: #blessed_reviewers, epriestley
Subscribers: chad, Korvin, epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T4411
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D11049
Summary: Modernize Differential edges to subclass `PhabricatorEdgeType`. Largely based on D11045.
Test Plan: From previous experience, these changes are fairly trivial and safe. I poked around a little to make sure things looked reasonably okay.
Reviewers: epriestley, #blessed_reviewers
Reviewed By: epriestley, #blessed_reviewers
Subscribers: Korvin, Krenair, epriestley
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D11074
Summary: This is a typo from D11045.
Test Plan: I haven't actually tested this, but the tests from D11045 should apply here.
Reviewers: epriestley, #blessed_reviewers
Reviewed By: epriestley, #blessed_reviewers
Subscribers: Korvin, epriestley
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D11108
Summary: Fixes T6838. We use a special transaction type for merging, but don't handle it when figuring out mail tags.
Test Plan: Verified merge mail picks up the `maniphest-status` tag.
Reviewers: btrahan, chad
Reviewed By: chad
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T6838
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D11101
