Summary: Ref T13682. Many subclasses of "CursorPagedPolicyAwareQuery" have the same implementation of "loadPage()", and this is a sensible default behavior.
Test Plan: Examined changes to verify that all removed methods have the same behavior.
Subscribers: PHID-OPKG-gm6ozazyms6q6i22gyam
Maniphest Tasks: T13682
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D21838
Summary: Depends on D20738. Ref T13366. Fixes T8389. Now that the infrastructure is in place, actually send email to external addresses.
Test Plan: Used `bin/phortune invoice` to generate invoices and saw associated external accounts receive mail in `bin/mail list-outbound`.
Maniphest Tasks: T13366, T8389
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D20739
Summary: Ref T13366. This gives each account email address an "external portal" section so they can access invoices and receipts without an account.
Test Plan: Viewed portal as user with authority and in an incognito window.
Maniphest Tasks: T13366
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D20737
Summary:
Depends on D20734. Ref T13366. This makes the cart/order flow work under the new policy scheme with no "grantAuthority()" calls.
It prepares for a "Void Invoice" action, although the action doesn't actually do anything yet.
Test Plan: With and without merchant authority, viewed and paid invoices and went through the other invoice interaction workflows.
Maniphest Tasks: T13366
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D20735
Summary:
Ref T13366. Depends on D20721. Continue applying UI and policy updates to the last two Phortune objects.
Charges aren't mutable and Carts are already transactional, so this is less involved than prior changes.
Test Plan: Viewed various charge/order interfaces as merchants and account members.
Maniphest Tasks: T13366
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D20732
Summary:
Depends on D20720. Ref T13366.
- Use modern policies and policy interfaces.
- Use new merchant authority cache.
- Add (some) transactions.
- Move MFA from pre-upgrade-gate to post-one-shot-check.
- Simplify the autopay workflow.
- Use the "reloading arrows" icon for subscriptions more consistently.
Test Plan: As a merchant-authority and account-authority, viewed, edited, and changed autopay for subscriptions.
Subscribers: PHID-OPKG-gm6ozazyms6q6i22gyam
Maniphest Tasks: T13366
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D20721
Summary:
Depends on D20718. Ref T13366. Ref T13367.
- Phortune payment methods currently do not use transactions; update them.
- Give them a proper view page with a transaction log.
- Add an "Add Payment Method" button which always works.
- Show which subscriptions a payment method is associated with.
- Get rid of the "Active" status indicator since we now treat "disabled" as "removed", to align with user expectation/intent.
- Swap out of some of the super weird div-form-button UI into the new "big, clickable" UI for choice dialogs among a small number of options on a single dimension.
Test Plan:
- As a mechant-authority and account-authority, created payment methods from carts, subscriptions, and accounts. Edited and viewed payment methods.
Subscribers: PHID-OPKG-gm6ozazyms6q6i22gyam
Maniphest Tasks: T13367, T13366
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D20719
Summary:
Depends on D20717. Ref T13366. Make PhortunePaymentMethod use an extended policy interface for consistency with modern approaches. Since Accounts have hard-coded policy behavior (and can't have object policies like "Subscribers") this should have no actual impact on program behavior.
This leaves one weird piece in the policy dialog UIs, see T13381.
Test Plan: Viewed and edited payment methods as a merchant and account member. Merchants can only view, not edit.
Maniphest Tasks: T13366
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D20718
Summary:
Depends on D20715. Ref T13366. See that task for discussion.
Replace the unreliable "grantAuthority()"-based check with an actual "can the viewer edit any merchant this account has a relationship with?" check.
This makes these objects easier to use from a policy perspective and makes it so that the `Query` alone can fully enforce permissions properly with no setup, so general infrastructure (like handles and transactions) works properly with Phortune objects.
Test Plan: Viewed merchants and accounts as users with no authority, direct authority on the account, and indirect authority via a merchant relationship.
Maniphest Tasks: T13366
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D20716
Summary:
Depends on D20713. Ref T13366. When a payment account establishes a relationship with a merchant by creating a cart or subscription, create an edge to give the merchant access to view the payment account.
Also, migrate all existing subscriptions and carts to write these edges.
This aims at straightening out Phortune permissions, which are currently a bit wonky on a couple of dimensions. See T13366 for detailed discussion.
Test Plan:
- Created and edited carts/subscriptions, saw edges write.
- Ran migrations, saw edges write.
Subscribers: PHID-OPKG-gm6ozazyms6q6i22gyam
Maniphest Tasks: T13366
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D20715
Summary: Depends on D20697. Ref T8389. Add support for adding "billing@enterprise.com" and similar to Phortune accounts.
Test Plan: Added and edited email addresses for a payment account.
Subscribers: PHID-OPKG-gm6ozazyms6q6i22gyam
Maniphest Tasks: T8389
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D20713
Summary: Ref T13217. This older query does some manual joins; update it for more modern joins.
Test Plan: Ran `instances/` unit tests and got a clean result, browsed Phortune merchants.
Reviewers: amckinley
Reviewed By: amckinley
Maniphest Tasks: T13217
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D19820
Summary:
Ref T13216. Ref T13217. Depends on D19800. This fixes all of the remaining query warnings that pop up when you run "arc unit --everything".
There's likely still quite a bit of stuff lurking around, but hopefully this covers a big set of the most common queries.
Test Plan: Ran `arc unit --everything`. Before change: lots of query warnings. After change: no query warnings.
Reviewers: amckinley
Reviewed By: amckinley
Maniphest Tasks: T13217, T13216
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D19801
Summary: Depends on D19785. Ref T13217. This converts many of the most common clause construction pathways to the new %Q / %LQ / %LO / %LA / %LJ semantics.
Test Plan: Browsed around a bunch, saw fewer warnings and no obvious behavioral errors. The transformations here are generally mechanical (although I did them by hand).
Reviewers: amckinley
Reviewed By: amckinley
Subscribers: hach-que
Maniphest Tasks: T13217
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D19789
Summary:
See support email. There's nothing tricky here, we were just missing a check. The different parts of this got built at different times so I think this was simply overlooked.
Also add a redundant check just to future-proof this and be on the safe side.
Test Plan: Used `bin/phortune invoice` to charge a pact subscription. After deleting the card, the charge failed with an appropriate error.
Reviewers: amckinley
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D19020
Summary: Is a logo. For merchants.
Test Plan: Set a new logo, remove it. See on list.
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: Korvin
Maniphest Tasks: T7607
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D16751
Summary: Previously we collapsed all table search results, but the new UI doesn't need it. Remove unused methods and fix CSS.
Test Plan: Legalpad Signatures, Phortune Accounts.
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: Korvin
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D16469
Summary: Moves everything I could find in Phortune to new UI layouts.
Test Plan: Tested every page I could get two, unclear how to test subscriptions.
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: Korvin
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15513
Summary: Ref T8099. This adds a new class which all search engines return for layout. I thought about this a number of ways, and I think this is the cleanest path. Each Engine can return whatever UI bits they needs, and AppSearch or Dashboard picks and lays the bits out as needed. In the AppSearch case, interfaces like Notifications, Calendar, Legalpad all need more custom layouts. I think this also leaves a resonable path forward for NUX as well. Also, not sure I implemented the class correctly, but assume thats easy to fix?
Test Plan: Review and do a search in each application changed. Grep for all call sites.
Reviewers: btrahan, epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: epriestley, Korvin
Maniphest Tasks: T8099
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D13332
Summary:
Ref T8099. In most cases we return either an ObjectList or AphrontTable, and can pretty up the UI in ApplicationSearch. There are a few edge cases, like PeopleUserLog, that can be cleanup up individually in the future, but look fine for now.
Also added 'setNotice' for AphrontTable for a few cases where we want to convey addtional information.
TODO: Seems we always pass a Pager Object, which tries to get displayed, I'll redesign that interaction in the future, probably by passing the Pager to the ObjectBox
Test Plan: Went throught most/all ApplicationSearch panels I could find, even edge cases look better.
Reviewers: btrahan, epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: Korvin, epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T8099
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D12989
Summary: Converts most all tables to be directly set via `setTable` to an ObjectBox. I think this path is more flexible design wise, as we can change the box based on children, and not just CSS. We also already do this with PropertyList, Forms, ObjectList, and Header. `setCollapsed` is added to ObjectBox to all children objects to bleed to the edges (like diffs).
Test Plan: I did a grep of `appendChild($table)` as well as searches for `PHUIObjectBoxView`, also with manual opening of hundreds of files. I'm sure I missed 5-8 places. If you just appendChild($table) nothing breaks, it just looks a little funny.
Reviewers: epriestley, btrahan
Subscribers: Korvin, epriestley
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D12955
Summary:
Ref T6881. Allows accounts to browse all unpaid invoices (although we currently show all of them on the account screen anyway).
Also allows merchants to browse unpaid invoices, which they could not do before. This will let us start suspending instances for nonpayment eventually.
Test Plan:
- Browsed unpaid invoices as various users.
- Browsed merchant unpaid invoices.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T6881
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D12681
Summary:
Ref T4100. Ref T5595. These functions are trivial for now, but move us toward being able to define more default query behavior by default.
Future changes will give these methods meaningful, nontrivial behaviors.
Test Plan: `arc unit --everything`
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T5595, T4100
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D12454
Summary:
Ref T4100. Ref T5595.
To support a unified "Projects:" query across all applications, a future diff is going to add a set of "Edge Logic" capabilities to `PolicyAwareQuery` which write the required SELECT, JOIN, WHERE, HAVING and GROUP clauses for you.
With the addition of "Edge Logic", we'll have three systems which may need to build components of query claues: ordering/paging, customfields/applicationsearch, and edge logic.
For most clauses, queries don't currently call into the parent explicitly to get default components. I want to move more query construction logic up the class tree so it can be shared.
For most methods, this isn't a problem, but many subclasses define a `buildWhereClause()`. Make all such definitions protected and consistent.
This causes no behavioral changes.
Test Plan: Ran `arc unit --everything`, which does a pretty through job of verifying this statically.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: yelirekim, hach-que, epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T4100, T5595
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D12453
Summary:
See some earlier discussion in D11593:
> One thing I'm vaguely thinking about is the possibilty that users may be able to invoice one another directly, eventually. For example, we might invoice a contracting client.
> We might need an `isInvoice` flag eventually, but `subscriptionPHID` is a reasonable stand-in for now.
This adds such a flag.
Test Plan:
- Generated an ad-hoc invoice and verified it showed up in the right place.
- Used `bin/phortune invoice` to invoice a subscription and verified it worked correctly.
- Paid an invoice and saw it leave "pending invoices" status.
{F377029}
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D12480
Summary:
Fixes T7102. These panels don't work, aren't meaningful, and don't seem very useful.
We could eventually support providing context to dashboards somehow ("merchant dashboard") but don't have much of an apparent need for this.
Test Plan:
- Tried to create cart/subscription/charge dashboard panels.
- Unable to create new ones.
- The ones from before the change show a relevant error now.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T7102
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D11953
Summary:
Currently, PhortuneAccounts have a very open default policy to allow merchants to see and interact with them.
This has the undesirable side effect of leaking their names in too many places, because all users are allowed to load the handles for the accounts. Although this information is not super sensitive, we shouldn't expose it.
I went through about 5 really messy diffs trying to fix this. It's very complicated because there are a lot of objects and many of them are related to PhortuneAccounts, but PhortuneAccounts are not bound to a specific merchant. This lead to a lot of threading viewers and merchants all over the place through the call stack and some really sketchy diffs with OmnipotentUsers that weren't going anywhere good.
This is the cleanest approach I came up with, by far:
- Introduce the concept of an "Authority", which gives a user more powers as a viewer. For now, since we only have one use case, this is pretty open-ended.
- When a viewer is acting as a merchant, grant them authority through the merchant.
- Have Accounts check if the viewer is acting with merchant authority. This lets us easily implement the rule "merchants can see this stuff" without being too broad.
Then update the Subscription view to respect Merchant Authority.
I partially updated the Cart views to respect it. I'll finish this up in a separate diff, but this seemed like a good checkpoint that introduced the concept without too much extra baggage.
This feels pretty good/clean to me, overall, even ignoring the series of horrible messes I made on my way here.
Test Plan:
- Verified I can see everything I need to as a merchant (modulo un-updated Cart UIs).
- Verified I can see nothing when acting as a normal user.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D11945
Summary:
Fixes T7285. If the user tries to view a subscription they don't have permission to view, we may filter all the subscriptions out, then still try to load related data. This can fatal because it's invalid.
Instead, bail if we filtered everything.
Test Plan: Subscritption detail page of another user's subscription is now 404 instead of fatal.
Reviewers: btrahan, chad
Reviewed By: chad
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T7285
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D11780
Summary: Fixes T7118. This does the basic "filter the list" thing, though it ends up being a little manual since I guess this hasn't come up before? There is also potential weird behavior if the user was using an app and lost access to it - they will have nothing selected on edit - but I think this is actually correct behavior in this circumstance.
Test Plan:
used a user who couldn't get access to the "quick create" apps and noted that the dropdown list on dashboard panel create was missing the expected engines
ran `arc unit --everything` to verify abstract method implemented everywhere
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: Korvin, epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T7118
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D11687
Summary:
Ref T6881. This is basically just some UX.
Right now, if we invoice you, you can //technically// pay it but since we don't tell you about it and don't show it in the UI you'd have to guess the ID by manipulating the URI. We should probably be at least a little more aggressive about billing.
In the common case when we generate a cart/order, we don't show it to the user or merchant in Phortune until the user takes a payment action (basically, Phortune doesn't recognize the cart until you actually check out with it). In the current use case in Fund (and other reasonable use cases) an un-acted-upon cart hasn't been ordered yet, and is just a place for the application to store state as it hands off the workflow to Phortune.
Even if we had a real "Shop for physical goods" app, I think the same rule would apply -- the application itself would probably track and show your current cart, but it wouldn't make sense to put it into your order history in Phortune until you actually buy it.
Since invoices from subscriptions are essentially identical to not-yet-ordered-carts, that mean they also did not show up in the UI (although I think this is also desirable).
This change carves out a place for them:
- Add an "invoices" section with unpaid invoices.
- The UI shows that you have unpaid invoices.
- Invoices have a slightly different rendering, inclduing an alluring "Pay Now" button.
Some considerations:
- One thing I'm vaguely thinking about is the possibilty that users may be able to invoice one another directly, eventually. For example, we might invoice a contracting client.
- Considering this, I thought about making these carts have a special status like `STATUS_DUE`, which replaces `STATUS_READY`, or a flag like `isInvoice`.
- However, this approach was pretty involved and made the //billing// logic more complicated, so I backed off. The ultimate approach here puts more of the complexity into the display logic, which feels better to me.
- We might need an `isInvoice` flag eventually, but `subscriptionPHID` is a reasonable stand-in for now.
- The OrderTable serving double duty for rendering subscriptions feels a little muddy, but I think splitting it into two highly-redundant classes would be worse.
Test Plan:
{F279348}
{F279349}
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T6881
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D11593
Summary:
Ref T6881. This generates a product, purchase and invoice for users, and there's sort of some UI for them. Stuff it doesn't do yet:
- Try to autobill when we have a CC;
- actually tell the user they should pay it;
- ask the application for anything like "how much should we charge", or tell the application anything like "the user paid".
However, these work:
- You can //technically// pay the invoices.
- You can see the invoices you paid in the past.
Test Plan: Used `bin/phriction invoice` to double-bill myself over and over again. Paid one of the invoices.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T6881
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D11580
Summary:
Ref T6881.
- Add a subscription detail page.
Minor cosmetics:
- Fix glyph, from "X" (old "X marks the spot" icon) to "diamond" (new gem icon).
- Name the initial account "Default Account" instead of "Personal Account", since this seems more general.
Test Plan:
{F278623}
And I got two full days to test that Jan 30/31 -> Feb 28 billing logic!
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T6881
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D11576
Summary:
Ref T6881. This still doesn't "work" in any reasonable sense of the word, but gets us a bit further.
I'll build out the Phortune UI a little bit next, then look at implementing the Worker to do actual billing.
Test Plan:
- Allocated an instance and saw a Subscription generate properly.
- Saw subscription show up in the Phortune UI, albeit in a very limited way.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T6881
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D11575
Summary:
Ref T6881. This roughs in the major objects, support classes, and controllers.
- Show subscriptions on account detail.
- Browse all account subscriptions.
- Link to active subsciptions from merchant detail.
Test Plan: Clicked around in the UI. There's no way to create subscriptions yet, so I basically just kicked the tires on this. I probably missed a few things that I'll clean up in followups.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T6881
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D11482
Summary: Ref T6822.
Test Plan: Visual inspection. These methods are only called from within the `PhabricatorApplicationSearchEngine` class.
Reviewers: #blessed_reviewers, epriestley
Reviewed By: #blessed_reviewers, epriestley
Subscribers: Korvin, epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T6822
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D11242
Summary: Ref T2787. I mostly just want these in place so I can glue emails to them, but they're also useful on their own.
Test Plan: {F216515}
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T2787
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10688
Summary: Ref T2787. Currently, we show all orders/charges, which won't scale well. Show the 10 most recent and link to full order/charge history.
Test Plan: {F216325}
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T2787
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10685
Summary: Ref T2787. This stuff is now irrelevant and/or has no callsites.
Test Plan: `grep`, poked around
Reviewers: chad, btrahan
Reviewed By: chad, btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T2787
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10684
Summary:
Ref T2787. Make this a little more concrete with explicit membership instead of a general edit policy. In particular, we need to know who to email when orders happen, and can't reasonably do that with an edit policy.
I imagine this might eventually get more nuanced (e.g., users who can only approve orders vs users who can manage the merchant itself) but that's a long ways away.
Test Plan: {F216284}
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T2787
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10681
Summary:
Ref T2787.
- Account members can add and remove other members (major use case is corporate accounts).
- Use a modern edge constant setup.
Test Plan: See screenshots.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T2787
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10678
Summary: Ref T2787. Allow merchants to flag orders for review. For now, all orders are flagged for review. Eventually, I could imagine Herald rules for coarse things (e.g., require review of all orders over $1,000, or require review of all orders by users not on a whitelist) and maybe examining fraud data for the providers which support it.
Test Plan: {F215848}
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T2787
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10675
Summary: Ref T2787. Support multiple payment accounts so you can have personal vs company payment accounts.
Test Plan: See screenshots.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T2787
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10673
Summary:
Ref T2787. Builds on D10649 by rebining existing objects (carts, charges, etc) to merchantPHIDs and providerPHIDs instead of an implicit global merchant and weird global artifacts (providerType / providerKey).
Basically:
- When you create something that users can pay for, you specify a merchant to control where the payment goes.
- Accounts are install-wide, but payment methods are bound to merchants. This seems to do a reasonable job of balancing usability and technical concerns.
- Replace a bunch of weird links between objects with standard PHIDs.
- Improve "add payment method" flow.
Test Plan: Went through the Fund flow with Stripe and WePay, funding an initiative.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T2787
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10652
Summary:
Ref T2787. Instead of making providers global configuration, make them a thing on merchants with web configuration.
Payment methods and some of the pyament workflow needs to be retooled a bit after this, but this seemed like a reasonable cutoff point for this diff.
Test Plan: See screenshots.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T2787
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10649
Summary:
Ref T2787. Currently, you add payment providers (Stripe, Paypal, etc) in global configuration.
Generally, this approach is cumbersome, limiting, and often hard for users to figure out. It also doesn't provide a natural way to segment payment receivers or provide web access to administrative payment functions like issuing refunds, canceling orders, etc. I think that stuff definitely needs to be in the web UI, and the rule for access to it can't reasonably just be "all administrators" in a lot of reasonable cases.
The only real advantage is that it prevents an attacker from adjusting settings and pointing something at an account they control. But this attack can be mitigated through notifications, some sort of CLI-only merchant lock, payment accounts being relatively identifiable, etc.
So introduce "merchants", which are basically payable entities. An individual merchant will have attached Paypal, Stripe, etc., accounts, and access rules. When you buy something in an application, the merchant to pay is also specified. They also provide an umbrella for dealing with permissions down the line.
This may get a //little// cumbersome because if there are several merchants your saved card information is not shared across them. I think that will be fine in the normal case (most installs will have only one merchant). Even if it isn't and we leave providers global, I think introducing this is the right call from a web UI / permissions point of view. I'll play around with it in the next couple of diffs and figure out exactly where the line goes.
Test Plan: Listed, created, edited, viewed merchants.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T2787
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10648
Summary:
Ref T2787. This doesn't get all the edge cases quite correct, but is generally a safe, complete payment workflow:
- Shares the actual charging state logic.
- Makes it appropriately stateful with locking and transactions.
- Gets the main flow correct.
- Detects failure cases, just tends to blow up rather than help the user resolve them.
Test Plan:
- Charged with WePay.
- Charged with Infinite Free Money.
- Resumed an abandoned cart.
- Hit all failure states where we just dead-end the cart. Not ideal, but (seemingly) complete/safe/correct.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T2787
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10639
Summary: Ref T2787. Similar to D10634, give applications more control over the cart workflow. For now this just means they get to pick exit URIs, but in the future they can manage more details of cart behavior.
Test Plan: Funded an initiative and got returned to the initiative instead of dead-ending in Phortune.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T2787
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10638
Summary:
Ref T2787. When a user purchases a product in Phortune, transition the cart through a purchased state and invoke product callbacks so applications can respond to the workflow.
Also shore up some stuff like preventing negative amounts of funding.
Test Plan: Backed an initiative and saw it show up on the initiative after completing the purcahsing workflow.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T2787
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10635
