Summary: Ref T182. Make a reasonable attempt to get the commit message, author, and committer data correct.
Test Plan: BEHOLD: rGITTEST810b7f17cd0c909256a45d29a5062fcf417d0489
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T182
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D14280
Summary:
Ref T182. If 35 other things are configured completely correctly, make it remotely possible that this button may do something approximating the thing that the user wanted.
This primarily fleshes out the idea that "operations" (like landing, merging or cherry-picking) can have some beahavior, and when we run an operation we do whatever that behavior is instead of just running `git show`.
Broadly, this isn't too terrible because Drydock seems like it actually works properly for the most part (???!?!).
Test Plan: {F876431}
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T182
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D14270
Summary:
Ref T9252. This primarily allows Harbormaster to request (and Drydock to fulfill) working copies with a patch from a staging area. Doing this means we can do builds on in-review changes from `arc diff`.
This is a little cobbled-together but should basically work.
Also fix some other issues:
- Yielded, awakend workers are fine to update but could complain.
- We can't log slot lock failures to resources if we don't end up saving them.
- Killing the transaction would wipe out the log.
- Fix some TODOs, etc.
Test Plan: Ran Harbormaster builds on a local revision.
Reviewers: hach-que, chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T9252
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D14214
Summary: Ref T9252. This is still crude in a few ways but basically works, at least for commits.
Test Plan:
- Made a build plan with just this build step.
- Ran `bin/harbormaster build --plan 10 ...` on a commit.
- It actually built a working copy, leased it, took no action, and released the lease. MAGIC~~~
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T9252
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D14160
Summary:
This reverts commit 1583738842.
See T8646 for discussion. This version of the feature feels terrible on real data.
Test Plan: Strict revert.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D14097
Summary:
Ref T8646. This is fairly rough:
This interface is very niche, and not really flexible enough to accommodate other result customization (but I don't think we have any plans here)?
I'm just //summarizing// the content of documents, basically showing the first paragraph of their content, summary, etc. This isn't what Google does: it shows snippets surrounding the actual search terms. However, this is more involved and might be less useful in structured data: for example, I'd imagine that the first line of most phriciton documents, maniphest tasks and Differential revisions really might be the best machine-generatable summary of them. The actual contextual snippeting in Google doesn't often seem hugely useful to me. But this might also not be very useful.
There's not much design, not sure if you had any ideas.
I only implemented this for tasks, revisions and the wiki since those seem most useful.
I'm generally on the fence about this, but it's not a ton of work to swap out for something else later. Maybe we can see how it feels? But happy to toss it or rethink the approach.
Test Plan: {F788026}
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T8646
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D14095
Summary:
Fixes T8004.
- For paths which are part of a package, show the package.
- Highlight paths which are part of a package you (the viewer) have authority over.
Test Plan:
{F725418}
- Viewed owned and unowned chagnes in Diffusion and Differential.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T8004
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D13923
Summary:
Ref T8096. This modernizes the last thing which was reading the old datasource.
Also fix a bug where it didn't work.
Test Plan: {F698405}
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T8096
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D13852
Summary: Ref T8096. This information has moved into Harbormaster.
Test Plan:
Pushed some test results in; see right margin:
{F698394}
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T8096
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D13850
Summary: Fixes T7604. This is the big scary change which drops the "arcanist project" fields from the database permanently.
Test Plan:
`grep`ped for the following to ensure that I had found all remaining references:
- `/arcanistProject/i`
- `/arcanist_project/i`
- `/projectName/i`
- `/project_name/i`
- `/project_id/i`
WARNING: Wait at least one month before landing this.
Reviewers: epriestley, #blessed_reviewers
Reviewed By: epriestley, #blessed_reviewers
Subscribers: Korvin, epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T7604
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D12899
Summary: Fixes T8095. Still needs UI/UX work (see T8096) but this has all the core features now.
Test Plan: Saw Harbormaster lint/unit data as though it was Differential lint-unit data.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T8095
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D13401
Summary:
Ref T8095. Two general problems:
- I want Harbormaster to own all lint and unit test results.
- I don't want users to have to configure anything for `arc` to keep working automatically.
These are in conflict because generic lint/unit test ownership in Harbormaster requires that build targets exist which we can attach build results to. However, we can't currently create build targets on demand: Harbormaster assumes it is responsible for creating targets, then running code or making third-party service calls to actually run the builds.
I considered two broad approaches to let `arc` push results into Harbormaster without requiring administrators to configure some kind of "arc results" build plan:
# Add magic target PHIDs like `PHID-MAGIC-this-is-really-arc-unit`.
# Add new code to build real targets with real PHIDs.
(1) is probably a bit less work to get off the ground, but I think it's worse overall and very likely to create more problems in the long run. I particularly worry that it will lead to a small amount of special casing in a very large number of places, which seems more fragile.
(2) is more work upfront but I think does a better job of putting all the special casing in one place that we can, e.g., more reasonably unit test, and letting the rest of the code rarely/never care about this case since it's just dealing with normal plans/steps/targets as far as it can tell.
This diff introduces "autoplans", which are source templates for plans/steps. This let us "push" these targets into Harbormaster. Hypthetically, any process "like" arc can use autoplans to upload test/lint/etc results. In practice, probably only `arc` will ever use this, but I think it's still quite a bit cleaner than the alternative despite all the generality.
Workflow is basically:
- `arc` creates a diff.
- `arc` calls `harbormaster.queryautotargets`, passing the diff PHID and saying "I have some lint and unit results I want to stick on this thing".
- Harbormaster builds the plan, steps, and targets (if any of them don't already exist), and hands back the target PHIDs so `arc` has a completely standard-looking place to put results.
- `arc` uploads the test results to the right targets, as though Harbormaster had asked it to run unit/lint in the first place.
(This doesn't actually do any of that yet, just sets things up.)
I'll maybe doc turn that ^^^^^^ into a doc for posterity since I think it's hard to guess what an "autotarget" is, but I'm going to grab some lunch first.
Test Plan:
- Added unit tests to make sure we can build these things properly.
- Used `harbormaster.queryautotargets` to build autotargets for a bunch of diffs.
- Verified targets come up in "waiting for message" state.
- Verified plans and steps are not editable.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: hach-que, epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T8095
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D13345
Summary:
Ref T8575. We run a big "(A) UNION (B)" query on the home page and on the main Differential page.
"A" can always be improved by using `%Ls`, so it can use the second half of the `(authorPHID, status)` key.
"B" can sometimes be improved if the fraction of open revisions is smaller than the fraction of revisions you are reviewing. This is true for me on secure.phabricator.com (I'm a reviewer, either directly or via 'Blessed Reviewers', on about 80% of revisions, but <5% are open). In these cases, a `(status, phid)` key is more efficient.
Test Plan: Tweaked queries and added keys on this server, saw less derpy query plans and performance.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T8575
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D13325
Summary: All classes should extend from some other class. See D13275 for some explanation.
Test Plan: `arc unit`
Reviewers: epriestley, #blessed_reviewers
Reviewed By: epriestley, #blessed_reviewers
Subscribers: epriestley, Korvin
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D13283
Summary: Ref T8463.
Test Plan:
- Created a new revision via web UI with a username `@mention` in the summary and no repository.
- Prior to patch, hit a "not attached" error.
- After patch, no error.
- Created a new web UI revision, as above, but with a repository; saw repository work fine.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T8463
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D13205
Summary: Remove the `*TransactionType` classes and define the constants in the corresponding `*Transaction` class instead.
Test Plan: `grep`
Reviewers: #blessed_reviewers, epriestley
Reviewed By: #blessed_reviewers, epriestley
Subscribers: Korvin, epriestley
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D13188
Summary:
Ref T7703. See that task and inline for a bunch of discussion.
Briefly, when we run implicit policy rules ("to see a revision, you must also be able to see its repository") at query time, they don't apply to other viewers we might check later.
We do this very rarely, but when we do we're often doing it for a bunch of different viewers (for example, in Herald) so I don't want to just reload the object a million times.
Test Plan:
- Added and executed unit tests.
- Wrote a "flag everything" Herald rule, as in the original report in T7703, and no longer got "Unknown Object" flags on revisions.
- Rigged up a lot of cases in the web UI and couldn't find any inconsistencies, although this case is normally very hard to hit.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T7703
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D13104
Summary: Ref T7604. Remove these "arcanist project" fields from the `LiskDAO` classes, but leave the data intact (there are no more read/writes to this data).
Test Plan:
- Grepped for calls to these methods.
- Ran `./bin/storage adjust` to check for schema issues.
Reviewers: #blessed_reviewers, epriestley
Reviewed By: #blessed_reviewers, epriestley
Subscribers: Korvin, epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T7604
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D13012
Summary: These could cause F442758.
Test Plan: {F442779}
Reviewers: btrahan, joshuaspence
Reviewed By: joshuaspence
Subscribers: epriestley
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D13042
Summary:
Ref T7447. Implements per-viewer comment hiding. Once a comment is obsolete or uninteresting, you can hide it completely.
This is sticky per-user.
My hope is that this will strike a better balance between concerns than some of the other approaches (conservative porting, summarization, hide-all).
Specifically, this adds a new action here:
{F435621}
Clicking it completely collapses the comment into a small icon on the previous line, and saves the comment state as hidden for you:
{F435626}
You can click the icon to reveal all hidden comments below the line.
Test Plan:
- Hid comments.
- Showed comments.
- Created, edited, deleted and submitted comments.
- Used Diffusion comments (hiding is not implemented there yet, but I'd plan to bring it there eventually if it works out in Differential).
Reviewers: btrahan, chad
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: jparise, yelirekim, epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T7447
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D13009
Summary:
Fixes T6956. Before this change, we called PhabricatorUser::getOmnipotentUser in the various delete methods to query the data. Now, we use $engine->getViewer(), since its always a good thing to have less calls to PhabricatorUser::getOmnipotentUser thrown around the codebase.
I used the "codemod" tool to audit the existing calls to PhabricatorDestructorEngine (all of them) so ostensibly this gets all the spots. If I missed something though, its still going to work, so this change is very low risk.
Test Plan: ./bin/remove destroy P1; visit P1 and get a 404
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: Korvin, epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T6956
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D12866
Summary: Use `__CLASS__` instead of hard-coding class names. Depends on D12605.
Test Plan: Eyeball it.
Reviewers: #blessed_reviewers, epriestley
Reviewed By: #blessed_reviewers, epriestley
Subscribers: hach-que, Korvin, epriestley
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D12806
Summary:
Ref T7447. Fixes T7600. This likely needs significant adjustment, but implements content-aware comment porting for line changes.
Specifically, this moves lines around to adjust their position considering added and removed lines between the diffs and across rebases.
It does not try to do any actual content (line against line) matching.
Test Plan:
- Unit tests.
- Poking around in the web UI seems to generate mostly reasonable-ish results?
- This may be a huge step backward in some cases that I just haven't hit.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: yelirekim, epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T7600, T7447
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D12741
Summary: Ref T7776. This could get better, but I think I got most of the big stuff. It's ~4x faster now.
Test Plan:
Before:
{F393338}
After:
{F393339}
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T7776
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D12730
Summary: See D12702.
Test Plan: Made something a link and clicked it, seemed to work OK.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Subscribers: yelirekim, epriestley
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D12703
Summary:
Ref T7447. Ref T7870.
When a ghostly inline appears on the page, the timeline isn't currently aware that it's present, so it links elsewhere.
Instead, apply adjustments before rendering the timeline.
Ref T5030. This makes the behaviors in T5030 irrelevant most of the time.
Test Plan:
Before:
{F378106}
After:
- Inlines visible on page are linked directly.
- Inlines which we can't port (e.g., on files not present on current page) are still linked off-page.
- Used "Show Older" to page through and verify consistent rendering.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: yelirekim, epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T5030, T7870, T7447
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D12497
Summary:
Ref T7447. This ports comments forward and backward in the best case:
- The old comment is on a changeset with the same filename.
- The old and new files are pretty much the same, line-for-line.
This will fail to port a lot of comments around and probably port a lot of comments into goofy places. We can see how bad it is in practice.
Errata:
- Design is me cobbling something together, probably worth tweaking.
- "Old Comment" should, at a minimum, say "Newer Comment" sometimes, or we should come up with some better name for this stuff.
Test Plan: {F377214}
Reviewers: chad, btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: johnny-bit, yelirekim, epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T7447
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D12484
Summary:
Ref T7447. This class is currently a big mess with a lot of `withWeirdSpecialThingUsedInOnePlace()` type qualifiers.
Try to generalize/normalize it a bit.
Test Plan:
- Viewed inline comments.
- Created a new inline comment.
- Edited an inline comment.
- Marked an inline comment complete.
- Deleted, then undeleted an inline comment.
- Previewed inline comments.
- Viewed drafts as another user, verified they don't show up.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: yelirekim, epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T7447
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D12483
Summary:
Ref T1266. We won't detect a move/copy if fewer than 3 lines are changed.
However, you may move a block like:
Complicated Line A
Trivial Line B
Complicated Line C
...where "Trivial Line B" is something like a curly brace. If you move this block somewhere that happened to previously have a similar trivial curly brace line, we won't be able to find 3 contiguous added lines in order to detect the copy/move.
Instead, consider both changed and unchanged lines when trying to find contiguous blocks. This allows us to detect across gaps where lines were not actually changed.
This new algorithm may be too liberal (for example, we may end up incorrectly identifying moved/copied code before or after changed lines, not just between changed lines), but we can keep an eye on it and tweak it. The algorithm is better factored and better covered, now.
Test Plan:
- Added a unit test for this case.
- Spot-checked a handful of diffs and generally saw behavior that made sense and looked better than before.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T1266
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D12146
Summary:
Ref T1266. This prepares to fix case (2) on T1266 by improving the robustness of hunk parsing.
In particular, the copy detection code abuses this API because it isn't currently expressive or flexible enough.
Make it more flexible and cover it exhaustively.
I'll move callsites to the new stuff in upcoming revisions.
Test Plan: Unit tests.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T1266
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D12144
Summary:
Ref T1460. When a revision author updates/comments/etc on a revision, publish all their checkmarks.
This doesn't handle Diffusion/audits yet.
Test Plan: {F346870}
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: yelirekim, epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T1460
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D12126
Summary:
Ref T1460. This just barely works, but throwing it up in case any of it sounds mechanically crazy before we build integrations/UI/etc.
Specifically, these are the behaviors:
- You can mark your own draft comments as "done" before you submit them. The intent is to let reviewers mark their stuff advisory/minor/not-important before they submit it, to hint to authors that they don't expect the feedback to necessarily be addressed (maybe it's a joke, maybe it's just discussion, maybe it's "consider..").
- You can mark others' published comments as "done" if you're the revision/commit author. The intent is to keep this lightweight by not requiring an audit trail of who marked what done when. If anyone could mark anything done, we'd have to have some way to show who marked stuff.
- When you mark stuff done (or unmark it), it goes into a "draft" state, where you see the change but others don't see it yet. The intent is twofold:
- Be consistent with how inlines work.
- Allow us to publish a "epriestley updated this revision + epriestley marked 15 inlines as done" story later if we want. This seems more useful than publishing 15 "epriestley marked one thing as done" stories.
- The actual bit where done-ness publishes isn't implemented.
- UI is bare bones.
- No integration with the rest of the UI yet.
Test Plan: Clicked some checkboxes.
Reviewers: chad, btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: paulshen, chasemp, epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T1460
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D12033
Summary:
Ref T2009. Ref T1460.
Fixes T2618. When users hit "Delete" on inline comments, delete immediately and offer them "Undo". If they delete indirectly (e.g., by clicking "Delete" from the preview at the bottom of the page), we still prompt them, because the "Undo" action either won't be available or may not be easy to find. This is a "refdelete".
Fixes T6464. This was just a mess. Make it not as much of a mess. It should work now. Pretty sure.
Fixes T4999. We did not refresh these links often enough to find targets for them, so they could race with content. Reevaluate them after loading new changes.
Test Plan:
- Deleted and undid deletion of inlines from main view and preview.
- Clicked "View" on inlines.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T6464, T4999, T2618, T1460, T2009
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D12032
Summary:
Ref T1460. Ref T2618.
When publishing a draft inline, mark the inline it replies to (if any) as replied to.
Also, don't load deleted comments as drafts (sets the stage for T2618).
I'll make an effort to clean up the loading mess here in the next revision, and find some more appropriate home for the shared code.
Test Plan: Made and replied to comments in Differential and Diffusion. Saw comments get marked as "Has Replies" and "Is Reply".
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T2618, T1460
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D12025
Summary:
Ref T1460. Track and store which comments are threaded replies to other comments, vs merely appearing on the same lines.
This doesn't actually write `hasReplies` yet, since that needs to happen when we un-draft comments on submission.
Test Plan: Made inline comments in Differential and Diffusion, including replies. Replies were marked as "Is Reply".
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T1460
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D12017
Summary:
This is a pain to test, but we do a lot of needless "X committed thing (authored by X)" right now.
I think that's because we compare two handle links here, and they're never the same, even if they're both links to the same object.
Instead, compare the author and committer more carefully.
Test Plan: Will do it live.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D11635
Summary: In Maniphest, we say "X closed <task> by committing <commit>". In Differential, we currently say "X closed <revision> by commit <commit>", which sounds nongrammatical to me.
Test Plan: grammar'd
Reviewers: btrahan, chad
Reviewed By: chad
Subscribers: epriestley
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D11544
Summary: CLosed is a pretty important state and black tends to blend in a bit. This bumps to an alternate color to improve ability to scan and know state of objects.
Test Plan:
Review a number of closed objects. I will follow up with another diff on 'Archived' colors.
{F261895}
Reviewers: btrahan, epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: Korvin, epriestley
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D11222
Summary: Modernize remaining edges to subclass `PhabricatorEdgeType`. Largely based on D11045.
Test Plan: Browsed around and performed various actions include subscribing, unsubscribing and watching.
Reviewers: #blessed_reviewers, epriestley
Reviewed By: #blessed_reviewers, epriestley
Subscribers: epriestley
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D11116
Summary:
Removes an unused PhabricatorFeedStory Parameter from all getTitleForFeed() and getApplicationTransactionTitleForFeed() functions.
Ref D11088 Ref T6545
Test Plan: ran all unit tests and viewed some dashboard feeds
Reviewers: #blessed_reviewers, epriestley
Reviewed By: #blessed_reviewers, epriestley
Subscribers: Korvin, epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T6545
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D11146
Summary: Modernize Differential edges to subclass `PhabricatorEdgeType`. Largely based on D11045.
Test Plan: From previous experience, these changes are fairly trivial and safe. I poked around a little to make sure things looked reasonably okay.
Reviewers: epriestley, #blessed_reviewers
Reviewed By: epriestley, #blessed_reviewers
Subscribers: Korvin, Krenair, epriestley
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D11074
