Summary:
Ref T4065. The existence of two separate edit workflows for users is broadly confusing to administrators.
I want to unify user administration and improve administration of system agent accounts. Particularly, I plan to:
- Give administrators limited access to profile editing of system agents (e.g., change profile picture).
- Give administrators limited access to Settings for system agents.
- Broadly, move all the weird old special editing into standard editing.
Test Plan:
- Hit all the errors (delete self, no username, wrong username).
- Deleted a user.
- Visited page as a non-admin, got 403'd.
- Viewed old edit UI.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T4065
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D8662
Summary:
Currently, users get an error when making any changes to this field if they don't have a linked JIRA account.
Instead:
- We should only raise an error if they're trying to //add// issues, and only on the new issues. It's always fine to remove issues, and existing issues the author can't see are also fine.
- When we can't add things because there's no account (vs because there's a permissions error or they don't exist), raise a more tailored exception.
Test Plan:
- As JIRA and non-JIRA users, made various edits to this field.
- Got appropriate exceptions, including better tailoring.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: mbishopim3, epriestley
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D8676
Summary: Ref T418. Fixes T4642. The "changes since last update" and "branch" fields got dropped; restore them in a general, field-driven way.
Test Plan:
- Created a revision, got relevant sections in mail.
- Commented on a revision, got relevant sections in mail.
- Updated a revision, got relevant sections in mail.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: spicyj, epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T418, T4642
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D8657
Summary: Ref T3092. Ref T3549. Modernize the product creation and edit UIs and make them say "product" instead of "project".
Test Plan:
- Created products.
- Edited products.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T3092, T3549
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D8636
Summary: Ref T3549. This table isn't written to yet; rename it and the DAOs and modernize the history controller.
Test Plan: Viewed history page for a product.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T3549
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D8633
Summary:
Ref T3549. A few things here:
- Releeph has an object called a "Project". We'd like to call this a "Product" instead. See T3549. Rename easy instances that don't break URIs.
- Releeph has a "ProjectController" which tries to be smart about loading objects. However, it's big and messy and doesn't have the finesse to do policies or `needX(...)` correctly. It also generates URIs which collide with one another. Introduce "ProductController" to start to move away from it.
- Some small modernizations to this controller to take advantage of newer infrastructure (like easier dialog rendering).
Test Plan: Deactivated and reactivated products.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T3549
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D8632
Summary:
Fixes T3738. Facebook uses this to provide a couple of integrations (push karma, is user an intern?), but the mechanism is both very complex and not very general.
Instead, these features are better implemented in Hovercards or via CustomField. We'll help Facebook integrate things when the time comes, but per discussion in T3738 none of this is critical or especially complicated.
Test Plan:
- Grepped for all callsites.
- Viewed a request and verified that author/requestor populated and rendered correctly.
Reviewers: btrahan, chad
Reviewed By: chad
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T3738
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D8631
Summary: followup to D8544. This ends up creating an editor + transactions to get the job done.
Test Plan: made a column - saw a nice created transaction. edited the name - saw a nice name edit. deleted the column - saw a deleted transaction, updated "deleted" ui, and hte action change to activate. "Activated" the column and saw a transaction and updated UI. Tried to delete a column with tasks in it and got an error.
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: epriestley, Korvin
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D8620
Summary:
Fixes T4677. Implements a "send an email" pre-receive action, which sends push summaries.
For use cases where features are often pushed as a large number of commits (e.g., checkpoint commits are retained), using commit emails means users get a ton of email. Instead, this allows you to get an email about a push, which summarizes what changed.
Overall, this is basically the same as commit email, but more suitable for some workflows.
Test Plan:
Wrote some rules, then made a bunch of pushes. Got email like this:
{F134929}
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T4677
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D8618
Summary:
Ref T4677. This shows a more detailed view of an entire "git push", "hg push", or "svn commit".
This is mostly to give push summary emails a reasonable, stable URI to link to for T4677.
Test Plan:
- Pushed into SVN, Git and Mercurial.
- Viewed partial and imported event records.
{F134864}
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T4677
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D8616
Summary:
Ref T4677. Currently, we record individual actions in a push as PhabricatorRepositoryPushLogs, but tie them together only loosely with a `transactionKey`.
Provide a real PushEvent object, and move some of the denormalized fields to it. This primarily just gives us more robust infrastructure for building, e.g., email about pushes, for T4677, since we can act on real PHIDs rather than passing awkward identifiers around.
Test Plan:
- Performed migration.
- Looked at database for consistency.
- Browsed/queried push logs.
- Pushed a bunch of stuff.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T4677
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D8615
Summary: Ref T4590. Ref T1049. This is primarily intended to support HTTP auth in Harbormaster.
Test Plan: Added a field, edited it, etc.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T4590, T1049
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D8607
Summary:
Ref T1049. Allows external systems to send a message to a build target. The primary intended use case is:
- You make an HTTP request to Jenkins.
- The build goes into a "waiting" state.
- Later, Jenkins calls `harbormaster.sendmessage` to report that the target passed or failed.
- The build continues as appropriate.
This is deceptively complicated because:
- There are a lot of race concerns. We might get a message back from an external system before it even responds to the request we made. We want to make sure we process these messages no matter when we receive them.
- These messages need to be sent to a build target (vs a build or buildable) because we'll get into trouble with parallelization later on otherwise (Jenkins is told to do 3 builds; we can't tell which ones failed or what overall state is unless the message are sent to targets).
- I initially thought about implementing this as a separate "Wait for a response from an external system" build step. This gets a lot more complicated for users once we do parallelization, though. Particularly, in the case where you've told Jenkins to do 3 builds, the three "wait" steps need to know which target they're waiting for (and jenkins needs to know some unique identifier for each target). So this pretty much boils down to a more complicated, more error-prone version of using target PHIDs.
This makes the already-muddy Build UI a bit worse, but it needs a general clarity pass anyway (it's showing way too much uninteresting data, and should show a better summary of results instead).
Test Plan:
- This doesn't really do anything interesting yet.
- Used Conduit to send messages to build plans.
- Viewed the messages on the build screen.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T1049
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D8604
Summary: Ref T1049. For consistency, rename these to "Harbormaster...".
Test Plan: Ran migration, ran builds, everything still works fine.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T1049
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D8602
Summary: Ref T1049. D8588 already required custom code to change what it extends, so this is as good a time as we're going to get to move to more standard class name.
Test Plan: `arc liberate`; `arc lint`
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T1049
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D8601
Summary:
Ref T1049. Fixes T4602. Moves all the funky field stuff to CustomField. Uses ApplicationTransactions to apply and record edits.
This makes "artifact" fields a little less nice (but still perfectly usable). With D8599, I think they're reasonable overall. We can improve this in the future.
All other field types are better (e.g., fixes weird bugs with "bool", fixes lots of weird behavior around required fields), and this gives us access to many new field types.
Test Plan:
Made a bunch of step edits. Here's an example:
{F133694}
Note that:
- "Required" fields work correctly.
- the transaction record is shown at the bottom of the page.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T4602, T1049
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D8600
Summary: Ref T1049. This generally simplifies things. The steps which don't support variables generally don't make sense to support varaibles anyway.
Test Plan: Edited some steps.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T1049
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D8588
Summary: Fixes T1812. Moves the internal configuration into public space and documents it.
Test Plan:
- Tried to set it to some invalid stuff.
- Set it to various valid things.
- Browsed around, changed statuses, filtered statuses, viewed statuses, merged duplictes, examined transaction record, created tasks.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T1812
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D8585
Summary: Ref T1812. This still doesn't expose configuration to the user, but adds validation for it.
Test Plan: Added a pile of unit tests.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T1812
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D8584
Summary: See screenshot. This does look like an improvement to me.
Test Plan: {F133255}
Reviewers: btrahan, chad
Reviewed By: chad
Subscribers: epriestley, chad
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D8597
Summary: Fixes T4400. Removes very, very old "PhabricatorObjectListView", which was only used here.
Test Plan: {F132249}
Reviewers: chad, btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley, chad
Maniphest Tasks: T4400
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D8574
Summary: Update the infrastructure and UI of the client list.
Test Plan: {F131570}
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D8563
Summary:
Updates this stuff a bit:
- Add a global create permission for OAuth applications. The primary goal is to reduce attack surface area by making it more difficult for an adversary to do anything which requires that they create and configure an OAuth application/client. Normal users shouldn't generally need to create applications, OAuth is complex, and doing things with user accounts is inherently somewhat administrative.
- Use normal policies to check create and edit permissions, now that we have infrastructure for it.
- Use modern UI kit.
Test Plan:
- Created a client.
- Edited a client.
- Tried to create a client as a non-admin.
- Tried to edit a client I don't own.
{F131511}
{F131512}
{F131513}
{F131514}
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D8562
Summary: This modernizes and simplifies OAuth client authorizations a bit, moving them to a settings panel similar to the "Sessions" panel.
Test Plan:
- Viewed authorizations.
- Revoked an authorization.
- Created a test authorization.
{F131196}
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D8561
Summary: Fixes T4408. I had to add a "status" to colum. I think we'll need this once we get fancier anyway but for now we have "active" and deleted.
Test Plan: deleted a column. noted reloaded workboard with all those tasks back in the default colun. loaded a task and saw the initial transaction had a "Disabled" icon next to the deleted workboard. also saw the new transaction back to the default column worked.
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: epriestley, Korvin
Maniphest Tasks: T4408
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D8544
Summary:
This is partly a good feature, and partly should reduce false positives on HackerOne reporting things vaguely related to this.
Allow a user to terminate login sessions from the settings panel.
Test Plan:
- Terminated a session.
- Terminated all sessions.
- Tried to terminate all sessions again.
- Logged in with two browsers, terminated the other browser's session, reloaded, got kicked out.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D8556
Summary:
This is the other half of D8548. Specifically, the attack here was to set your own editor link to `javascript\n:...` and then you could XSS yourself. This isn't a hugely damaging attack, but we can be more certain by adding a whitelist here.
We already whitelist linkable protocols in remarkup (`uri.allowed-protocols`) in general.
Test Plan:
Tried to set and use valid/invalid editor URIs.
{F130883}
{F130884}
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D8551
Summary: Fixes T4430. Basically does a little code massage from the new stuff in D8525 and application transactions to get this working. Adds a new controller to the subscriptions app to make rendering these pretty easy peasy.
Test Plan: Used my test task in D8525 to verify both add and rem versions of these dialogs worked correctly.
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: epriestley, chad, Korvin
Maniphest Tasks: T4430
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D8540
Summary:
Fixes T4610. Open to suggestions, etc., if there's anything I'm missing.
Also:
- Moves these "system" endpoints into a real application.
- Makes `isUnlisted()` work a little more consistently.
Test Plan: Accessed `/robots.txt`, `/status/` and `/debug/`.
Reviewers: chad, btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: aran, epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T4610
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D8532
Summary: Ref T4430. This just deploys it on the property lists. (Help on how to do translations better? I tried a more traditional pht('%s, %s, %s, and %d other(s)') but I think the string lookup assumes the %d comes as the second param or something?)
Test Plan: Made a Maniphest Task with a hojillion subscribers and noted the working dialogue. Also made a Pholio Mock with lots of subscribers and it worked.
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: aran, epriestley, Korvin, chad
Maniphest Tasks: T4430
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D8525
Summary:
Ref T4593. Via HackerOne. An attacker can use the anchor reattachment, combined with the Facebook token workflow, combined with redirection on OAuth errors to capture access tokens. The attack works roughly like this:
- Create an OAuth application on Phabricator.
- Set the domain to `evil.com`.
- Grab the OAuth URI for it (something like `https://phabricator.com/oauthserver/auth/?redirect_uri=http://evil.com&...`).
- Add an invalid `scope` parameter (`scope=xyz`).
- Use //that// URI to build a Facebook OAuth URI (something like `https://facebook.com/oauth/?redirect_uri=http://phabricator.com/...&response_type=token`).
- After the user authorizes the application on Facebook (or instantly if they've already authorized it), they're redirected to the OAuth server, which processes the request. Since this is the 'token' workflow, it has auth information in the URL anchor/fragment.
- The OAuth server notices the `scope` error and 302's to the attacker's domain, preserving the anchor in most browsers through anchor reattachment.
- The attacker reads the anchor in JS and can do client workflow stuff.
To fix this, I've made several general changes/modernizations:
- Add a new application and make it beta. This is mostly cleanup, but also turns the server off for typical installs (it's not generally useful quite yet).
- Add a "Console" page to make it easier to navigate.
- Modernize some of the UI, since I was touching most of it anyways.
Then I've made specific security-focused changes:
- In the web-based OAuth workflow, send back a human-readable page when errors occur. I //think// this is universally correct. Previously, humans would get a blob of JSON if they entered an invalid URI, etc. This type of response is correct for the companion endpoint ("ServerTokenController") since it's called by programs, but I believe not correct for this endpoint ("AuthController") since it's used by humans. Most of this is general cleanup (give humans human-readable errors instead of JSON blobs).
- Never 302 off this endpoint automatically. Previously, a small set of errors (notably, bad `scope`) would cause a 302 with 'error'. This exposes us to anchor reattachment, and isn't generally helpful to anyone, since the requesting application did something wrong and even if it's prepared to handle the error, it can't really do anything better than we can.
- The only time we'll 'error' back now from this workflow is if a user explicitly cancels the workflow. This isn't a 302, but a normal link (the cancel button), so the anchor is lost.
- Even if the application is already approved, don't blindly 302. Instead, show the user a confirmation dialog with a 'continue' link. This is perhaps slightly less user-friendly than the straight redirect, but I think it's pretty reasonable in general, and it gives us a lot of protection against these classes of attack. This redirect is then through a link, not a 302, so the anchor is again detached.
-
Test Plan: I attempted to hit everything I touched. See screenshots.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: aran, epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T4593
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D8517
Summary:
Ref T4587.
- Add an option to generate a keypair.
- Add an option to view the public keys for existing keypairs.
Test Plan:
- Generated keypairs.
- Viewed public keys.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: aran, epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T4587
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D8515
Summary: Ref T4587. Add an option to automatically generate a keypair, associate the public key, and save the private key.
Test Plan: Generated some keypairs. Hit error conditions, etc.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: aran, epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T4587
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D8513
Summary:
- Fixes T4588.
- See D8501.
- Adds a "Tags" field for Herald commit emails.
- Fixes a bug in `tagsquery` when filtering by commit name.
- Make `tagsquery` just return nothing instead of fataling against Mercurial/Subversion.
Test Plan: Used `bin/repository/reparse.php --herald` to exercise this code.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: aran, epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T4588
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D8502
Summary:
Ref T4588. Request from @zeeg. Adds a "BRANCHES" field to commit emails, so the branches the commit appears on are shown.
I've implemented this with CustomField, but in a very light way.
Test Plan: Used `scripts/repository/reparse.php --herald` to generate mail, got a BRANCHES section where applicable.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: aran, epriestley, zeeg
Maniphest Tasks: T4588
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D8501
Summary:
Ref T4592. These were added with the intent of not requiring builds on Windows, but then we got builds on Windows working and they seem to be straightforward. See T4592 for most recent discussion.
Remove these methods because they aren't really practical for anything and increase attack surface area by giving adversaries access to `xhpast`, and generally bloat up the Conduit API. To my knowledge, nothing has ever called them.
(If an install somehow relies on these, they can drop them into `src/extensions/` to expose them again.)
Test Plan: Viewed conduit.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: aran, epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T4592
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D8500
Summary:
nothing too crazy here. try to be smart about some defaults (i.e. phame title is optional and can be derived from title; post as not a draft by default; etc). Fixes T3695.
also do a little re-factoring to centralizing initializing new posts and turning posts into dictionaries. also change blogs => posts in another conduit method so it makes sense and stuff.
Test Plan: made some posts via conduit. testing trying to specify blogger, phame title, and isDraft, all worked nicely
Reviewers: chad, epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: aran, epriestley, Korvin
Maniphest Tasks: T3695
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D8485
Summary:
Ref T2222.
- Removes `DifferentialTasksAttacher`, which has had no callsites for a very long time.
- Moves `differential.getrevisioncomments` off `DifferentialCommentQuery`.
- Moves Releeph churn field off `DifferentialCommentQuery`.
- Removes dead code in `DifferentialRevisionViewController`.
- Removes `DifferentialException` (no references).
- Removes `DifferentialRevision->loadComments()` (no callsites).
- Removes `DifferentialRevision->loadReviewedBy()` (all callsites updated).
- Removes `DifferentialCommentQuery` (all callsites updated).
Test Plan: Mostly a lot of `grep`.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T2222
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D8476
Summary: Ref T2222. Makes the "lint/unit errors" warnings work again.
Test Plan: Viewed some revisions with and without these warnings.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T2222
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D8475
Summary: Ref T2222. The unit and lint fields still have one piece of functionality that I need to port, but everythign else is obsolete.
Test Plan: Lots of `grep`.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T2222
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D8474
Summary:
Ref T2222. Brings the major mail features (affected files, patches) forward.
This drops some of the minor integrations which just show object state (like "Maniphest Tasks") since I think they're not very important. I'll put them back if users miss them.
Test Plan: Sent mail with inline/attached patches.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T2222
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D8459
Summary: Ref T2222. This has no callsites and no functionality not present in the TransactionEditor.
Test Plan: awwyiss
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T2222
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D8456
Summary: Ref T2222. Ref T3886. Converts parsing and construction of commit messages to be driven by CustomField.
Test Plan:
This is a huge, messy change. I've made an effort to test it exhasutively, but suspect I probably missed a few behaviors. Roughly:
- Enumerted all current fields (fields implementing `shouldAppearOnCommitMessage()`) and tried to test them one by one.
- Used `arc diff --edit` repeatedly to manipulate each field (this workflow hits both the parse and construct steps).
- Used `arc amend --show` to examine construct output (this does not activate the "edit" mode).
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T3886, T2222
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D8449
