Summary:
Ref T13197. See PHI873. Record when a user has MFA'd and add a little icon to the transaction, similar to the exiting "Silent" icon.
For now, this just makes this stuff more auditable. Future changes may add ways to require MFA for certain specific transactions, outside of the ones that already always require MFA (like revealing credentials).
Test Plan: {F5877960}
Reviewers: amckinley
Reviewed By: amckinley
Maniphest Tasks: T13197
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D19665
Summary:
Depends on D19606. Ref T13189. See PHI642.
- Disabling/enabling users no longer requires admin. Now, you just need "Can Disable Users".
- Update the UI to appropriately show the action in black or grey depending on what clicking the button will do.
- For "Approve/Disapprove", fix a couple bugs, then let them go through without respect for "Can Disable Users". This is conceptually a different action, even though it ultimately sets the "Disabled" flag.
Test Plan:
- Disabled/enabled users from the web UI as various users, including a non-administrator with "Can Disable Users".
- Hit permissions errors from the web UI as various users, including an administrator without "Can Disable Users".
- Saw the "Disable/Enable" action activate properly based on whether clicking the button would actually work.
- Disapproved a user without "Can Disable Users" permission, tried to re-disapprove a user.
- Approved a user, tried to reapprove a user.
Reviewers: amckinley
Maniphest Tasks: T13189
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D19607
Summary:
Depends on D19605. Ref T13189. See PHI642. This adds a separate "Can Disable Users" capability, and makes the underlying transaction use it.
This doesn't actually let you weaken the permission, since all pathways need more permissions:
- `user.edit` needs CAN_EDIT.
- `user.disable/enable` need admin.
- Web UI workflow needs admin.
Upcoming changes will update these pathways.
Without additional changes, this does let you //strengthen// the permission.
This also fixes the inability to disable non-bot users via the web UI.
Test Plan:
- Set permission to "No One", tried to disable users. Got a tailored policy error.
- Set permission to "All Users", disabled/enabled a non-bot user.
Reviewers: amckinley
Maniphest Tasks: T13189
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D19606
Summary:
Depends on D19604. Ref T13189. See PHI642. Deprecates these in favor of "user.edit", redefines them in terms of it, and removes the old `disableUser()` method.
I kept the "is admin" permissions check for consistency, since these methods have always said "(admin only)". This check may not be the most tailored check soon, but we can just keep executing it in addition to the real check.
For now, this change stops this method from actually disabling non-bot users (since it implicitly adds a CAN_EDIT requirement, and even administrators don't have that). An upcoming change will fix that.
Test Plan: Enabled and disabled a (bot) user via these methods. Checked API UI, saw them marked as "disabled".
Reviewers: amckinley
Maniphest Tasks: T13189
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D19605
Summary:
Ref T13189. See PHI642. Upgrades the "Disable" action in the web UI to be transaction-based.
This technically breaks things a little (you can't disable non-bot users, since they now require CAN_EDIT and you won't have it) but an upcoming change will fix the permissions issue.
Test Plan: Disabled and enabled a (bot) user from the web UI.
Reviewers: amckinley
Maniphest Tasks: T13189
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D19604
Summary:
Ref T13164. See PHI823. (See that issue for some more details and discussion.)
Add aural labels to various buttons which were missing reasonable aural labels.
The "Search" button (magnifying glass in the global search input) had an entire menu thing inside it. I moved that one level up and it doesn't look like it broke anything (?). All the other changes are pretty straightforward.
Test Plan:
{F5806497}
{F5806498}
- Will follow up on the issue to make sure things are in better shape for the reporting user.
Reviewers: amckinley
Reviewed By: amckinley
Maniphest Tasks: T13164
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D19594
Summary:
Depends on D19577. Ref T13164. See PHI642. This adds modern transaction-oriented enable/disable support.
Currently, this also doesn't let you disable normal users even when you're an administrator. I'll refine the policy model later in this change series, since that's also the goal here (let users set "Can Disable Users" to some more broad set of users than "Administrators").
This also leaves us with two different edit pathways: the old UserEditor one and the new UserTransactionEditor one. The next couple diffs will redefine the other pathways in terms of this pathway.
Test Plan:
- Enabled/disabled a bot.
- Tried to disable another non-bot user. This isn't allowed yet, since even as an administrator you don't have CAN_EDIT on them and currently need it: right now, there's no way for a particular set of transactions to say they can move forward with reduced permissions.
- Tried to enable/disable myself. This isn't allowed since you can't enable/disable yourself.
Reviewers: amckinley
Reviewed By: amckinley
Maniphest Tasks: T13164
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D19579
Summary:
Depends on D19576. Ref T13164. See PHI642. This adds an EditEngine for users and a `user.edit` modern API method.
For now, all it supports is editing real name, blurb, title, and icon (same as "Edit Profile" from the UI).
Test Plan:
- Edited my stuff via the new API method.
- Tried to edit another user, got rejected by policies.
- Tried to create a user, got rejected by policies.
Reviewers: amckinley
Reviewed By: amckinley
Maniphest Tasks: T13164
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D19577
Summary:
Ref T13164. See PHI642. I'd like to provide a third-generation `user.edit` API endpoint and make `user.enable` and `user.disable` obsolete before meddling with policy details, even if it isn't full-fledged yet.
Users do already have a transactions table and a Transaction-based editor, but it's only used for editing title, real name, etc. All of these are custom fields, so their support comes in automatically through CustomField extension code.
Realign it for modular transactions so new code will be fully modern. There are no actual standalone transaction types yet so this diff is pretty thin.
Test Plan:
- Grepped for `UserProfileEditor`.
- Edited a user's title/real name/icon.
Reviewers: amckinley
Reviewed By: amckinley
Maniphest Tasks: T13164
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D19576
Summary: Depends on D19429. Depends on D19423. Ref T12164. This creates new columns `authorIdentityPHID` and `committerIdentityPHID` on commit objects and starts populating them. Also adds the ability to explicitly set an Identity's assignee to "unassigned()" to null out an incorrect auto-assign. Adds more search functionality to identities. Also creates a daemon task for handling users adding new email address and attempts to associate unclaimed identities.
Test Plan: Imported some repos, watched new columns get populated. Added a new email address for a previous commit, saw daemon job run and assign the identity to the new user. Searched for identities in various and sundry ways.
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: Korvin, PHID-OPKG-gm6ozazyms6q6i22gyam
Maniphest Tasks: T12164
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D19443
Summary:
See <https://hackerone.com/reports/351361>. We currently require MFA on the screen leading into the user create flow, but not the actual create flow.
That is, `/people/create/` (which is just a "choose a type of account" page) requires MFA, but `/people/new/<type>/` does not, even though this is the actual creation page.
Requiring MFA to create users isn't especially critical: creating users isn't really a dangerous action. The major threat is probably just that an attacker can extend their access to an install by creating an account which they have credentials for.
It also isn't consistently enforced: you can invite users or approve users without an MFA check.
So there's an argument for just removing the check. However, I think the check is probably reasonable and that we'd likely prefer to add some more checks eventually (e.g., require MFA to approve or invite) since these actions are rare and could represent useful tools for an attacker even if they are not especially dangerous on their own. This is also the only way to create bot or mailing list accounts, so this check does //something// on its own, at least.
Test Plan:
- Visited `/people/new/standard/` as an admin with MFA configured.
- Before patch: no MFA prompt.
- After patch: MFA prompt.
Reviewers: amckinley
Reviewed By: amckinley
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D19448
Summary:
See PHI489. Ref T13110. At least for now, this just shows "..." at the end since you can click the revision to see the whole list anyway.
Also remove the older-style external Handle passing in favor of lazy construction via HandlePool.
Test Plan: Viewed revisions, fiddled with the 7 limit, got sensible-seeming "..." behavior.
Maniphest Tasks: T13110
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D19293
Summary:
See PHI413. You can pre-generate these with `bin/people profileimage --all`, but they're needlessly expensive to generate.
Streamline the workflow and cache some of the cacheable parts to reduce the generation cost.
Test Plan:
- Ran `bin/people profileimage --all` and saw cost drop from {nav 15.801s > 4.839s}.
- Set `defaultProfileImagePHID` to `NULL` in `phabricator_user.user` and purged caches with `bin/cache purge --all`.
- Loaded user directory.
- Saw default images regenerate relatively quickly.
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D19168
Summary: Depends on D19087. Ref T13079. This still doesn't feel like the most clean, general system in the world, but is a step forward from hard-coded `switch()` stuff.
Test Plan:
- Jumped to `r`.
- Jumped to `a`.
- Jumped to `r poe` (multiple results).
- Jumped to `r poetry` (one result).
- Jumped to `r syzygy` (no results).
- Jumped to `p`.
- Jumped to `p robot` (multiple results); `p assessment` (one result).
- The behavior for `p <string>` has changed slightly but should be more powerful now (it's consistent with `r <string>`).
- Jumped to `s <symbol>` and `s <context>-><symbol>`.
- Jumped to `d`.
- Jumped to `f`.
- Jumped to `t`.
- Jumped to `T123`, `D123`, `@dog`, `PHID-DREV-abcd`, etc.
Maniphest Tasks: T13079
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D19088
Summary: Ref T13079. This recently-introduced Engine/EngineExtension are a good fit for adding more datasource functions in general, but we didn't think quite big enough in naming them.
Test Plan: Used quick search typeahead, hit applications/users/monograms/symbols/etc.
Maniphest Tasks: T13079
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D19087
Summary: I made the red stronger (always visible, not just a hover state) for the "Mute" feature, but this made Logout look a little intense. Just make it normal-colored, logging out isn't a big deal.
Test Plan: No longer saw bright red logout action in profile dropdown menu.
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D19044
Summary: Ref T13053. Adds more mail tags with information available on the Editor object.
Test Plan: Banged around in Maniphest, viewed the resulting mail, all the stamps seemed to align with reality.
Reviewers: amckinley
Reviewed By: amckinley
Maniphest Tasks: T13053
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D18995
Summary:
Depends on D18971. Ref T13049. The rule is currently "you can see IP addresses for actions which affect your account".
There's some legitimate motivation for this, since it's good if you can see that someone you don't recognize has been trying to log into your account.
However, this includes cases where an administrator disables/enables your account, or promotes/demotes you to administrator. In these cases, //their// IP is shown!
Make the rule:
- Administrators can see it (consistent with everything else).
- You can see your own actions.
- You can see actions which affected you that have no actor (these are things like login attempts).
- You can't see other stuff: usually, administrators changing your account settings.
Test Plan: Viewed activity log as a non-admin, no longer saw administrator's IP address disclosed in "Demote from Admin" log.
Reviewers: amckinley
Reviewed By: amckinley
Maniphest Tasks: T13049
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D18972
Summary: Ref T13049. This is just a general nice-to-have so you don't have to export a 300MB file if you want to check the last month of data or whatever.
Test Plan: Applied filters to all three logs, got appropriate date-range result sets.
Reviewers: amckinley
Reviewed By: amckinley
Maniphest Tasks: T13049
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D18970
Summary:
Depends on D18966. Ref T13049. Adds export support to user activity logs.
These don't have PHIDs. We could add them, but just make the "phid" column test if the objects have PHIDs or not for now.
Test Plan:
- Exported user activity logs, got sensible output (with no PHIDs).
- Exported some users to make sure I didn't break PHIDs, got an export with PHIDs.
Reviewers: amckinley
Reviewed By: amckinley
Maniphest Tasks: T13049
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D18967
Summary: Depends on D18965. Ref T13049. Move this Query and SearchEngine to be a little more modern, to prepare for Export support.
Test Plan:
- Used all the query fields, viewed activity logs via People and Settings.
- I'm not sure the "Session" query is used/useful and may remove it before I'm done here, but I just left it in place for now.
Reviewers: amckinley
Reviewed By: amckinley
Maniphest Tasks: T13049
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D18966
Summary:
Depends on D18959. Ref T13049. Provide tags, subscribers, spaces, and created/modified as automatic extensions for all objects which support them.
(Also, for JSON export, be a little more consistent about exporting `null` instead of empty string when there's no value in a text field.)
Test Plan: Exported users and tasks, saw relevant fields in the export.
Reviewers: amckinley
Reviewed By: amckinley
Maniphest Tasks: T13049
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D18960
Summary:
Ref T13049. All exportable objects should always have these fields, so make them builtins.
This also sets things up for extensions (like custom fields).
Test Plan: Exported user data, got the same export as before.
Reviewers: amckinley
Reviewed By: amckinley
Maniphest Tasks: T13049
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D18951
Summary:
Depends on D18934. Ref T13046. Add support for the new export flow to a second application.
My goal here is mostly just to make sure that this is general enough to work in more than one place, and exporting user accounts seems plausible as a useful feature, although we do see occasional requests for this feature exactly (like <https://discourse.phabricator-community.org/t/users-export-to-csv/968>).
The exported data may not truly be useful for much (no disabled/admin/verified/MFA flags, no external account data, no email addresses for policy reasons) but we can expand it as use cases arise.
Test Plan: Exported user accounts in several formats.
Reviewers: amckinley
Reviewed By: amckinley
Maniphest Tasks: T13046
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D18935
Summary:
Depends on D18907. Ref T13043. Ref T12509. We have some weird old password digest behavior that isn't terribly concerning, but also isn't great.
Specifically, old passwords were digested in weird ways before being hashed. Notably, account passwords were digested with usernames, so your password stops working if your username is chagned. Not the end of the world, but silly.
Mark all existing hashes as "v1", and automatically upgrade then when they're used or changed. Some day, far in the future, we could stop supporting these legacy digests and delete the code and passwords and just issue upgrade advice ("Passwords which haven't been used in more than two years no longer work."). But at least get things on a path toward sane, modern behavior.
Test Plan: Ran migration. Spot-checked that everthing in the database got marked as "v1". Used an existing password to login successfully. Verified that it was upgraded to a `null` (modern) digest. Logged in with it again.
Reviewers: amckinley
Reviewed By: amckinley
Maniphest Tasks: T13043, T12509
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D18908
Summary:
Ref T13043. After D18903, this data has migrated to shared infrastructure and has no remaining readers or writers.
Just delete it now, since the cost of a mistake here is very small (users need to "Forgot Password?" and pick a new password).
Test Plan: Grepped for `passwordHash`, `passwordSalt`, and variations.
Reviewers: amckinley
Reviewed By: amckinley
Maniphest Tasks: T13043
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D18904
Summary:
Ref T13043. This moves user account passwords to the new shared infrastructure.
There's a lot of code changes here, but essentially all of it is the same as the VCS password logic in D18898.
Test Plan:
- Ran migration.
- Spot checked table for general sanity.
- Logged in with an existing password.
- Hit all error conditions on "change password", "set password", "register new account" flows.
- Verified that changing password logs out other sessions.
- Verified that revoked passwords of a different type can't be selected.
- Changed passwords a bunch.
- Verified that salt regenerates properly after password change.
- Tried to login with the wrong password, which didn't work.
Reviewers: amckinley
Reviewed By: amckinley
Maniphest Tasks: T13043
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D18903
Summary:
Ref T13043. In D18898 I moved VCS passwords to the new shared infrastructure.
Before account passwords can move, we need to make two changes:
- For legacy reasons, VCS passwords and Account passwords have different "digest" algorithms. Both are more complicated than they should be, but we can't easily fix it without breaking existing passwords. Add a `PasswordHashInterface` so that objects which can have passwords hashes can implement custom digest logic for each password type.
- Account passwords have a dedicated external salt (`PhabricatorUser->passwordSalt`). This is a generally reasonable thing to support (since not all hashers are self-salting) and we need to keep it around so existing passwords still work. Add salt support to `AuthPassword` and make it generate/regenerate when passwords are updated.
Then add a nice story about password digestion.
Test Plan: Ran migrations. Used an existing VCS password; changed VCS password. Tried to use a revoked password. Unit tests still pass. Grepped for callers to legacy `PhabricatorHash::digestPassword()`, found none.
Reviewers: amckinley
Reviewed By: amckinley
Maniphest Tasks: T13043
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D18900
Summary:
See PHI223. Ref T13024. There's a remaining registration/login order issue after the other changes in T13024: we lose track of the current URI when we go through the MFA flow, so we can lose "Set Password" at the end of the flow.
Specifically, the flow goes like this today:
- User clicks the welcome link in email.
- They get redirected to the "set password" settings panel.
- This gets pre-empted by Legalpad (although we'll potentially survive this with the URI intact).
- This also gets pre-empted by the "Set MFA" workflow. If the user completes this flow, they get redirected to a `/auth/multifactor/?id=123` sort of URI to highlight the factor they added. This causes us to lose the `/settings/panel/password/blah/blah?key=xyz` URI.
The ordering on this is also not ideal; it's preferable to start with a password, then do the other steps, so the user can return to the flow more easily if they are interrupted.
Resolve this by separating the "change your password" and "set/reset your password" flows onto two different pages. This copy/pastes a bit of code, but both flows end up simpler so it feels reasonable to me overall.
We don't require a full session for "set/reset password" (so you can do it if you don't have MFA/legalpad yet) and do it first.
This works better and is broadly simpler for users.
Test Plan:
- Required MFA + legalpad, invited a user via email, registered.
- Before: password set flow got lost when setting MFA.
- After: prompted to set password, then sign documents, then set up MFA.
- Reset password (with MFA confgiured, was required to MFA first).
- Tried to reset password without a valid reset key, wasn't successful.
- Changed password using existing flow.
- Hit various (all?) error cases (short password, common password, mismatch, missing password, etc).
Reviewers: amckinley
Reviewed By: amckinley
Maniphest Tasks: T13024
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D18840
Summary:
See <https://discourse.phabricator-community.org/t/activation-link-in-welcome-mail-only-works-if-new-user-isnt-semi-logged-in/740/7>.
In T13024, I rewrote the main menu bar to hide potentially sensitive items (like notification and message counts and saved search filters) until users fully log in.
However, the "Log In" item got caught in this too. For clarity, rename `shouldAllowPartialSessions()` to `shouldRequireFullSession()` (since logged-out users don't have any session at all, so it would be a bit misleading to say that "Log In" "allows" a partial session). Then let "Log In" work again for logged-out users.
(In most cases, users are prompted to log in when they take an action which requires them to be logged in -- like creating or editing an object, or adding comments -- so this item doesn't really need to exist. However, it aligns better with user expectations in many cases to have it present, and some reasonable operations like "Check if I have notifications/messages" don't have an obvious thing to click otherwise.)
Test Plan: Viewed site in an incognito window, saw "Log In" button again. Browsed normally, saw normal menu.
Reviewers: amckinley
Reviewed By: amckinley
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D18818
Summary:
Use ClassQuery to find datasources for the quick-search.
Mostly, this allows extensions to add quicksearches.
Test Plan:
using `/typeahead/class/`, tested several search terms that make sense.
Removed the tag interface from a datasource, which removed it from results.
Reviewers: epriestley, amckinley, #blessed_reviewers
Reviewed By: epriestley, #blessed_reviewers
Subscribers: Korvin
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D18760
Summary:
Depends on D18792. Fixes T13024. Fixes T89198. Currently, when users are logging in initially (for example, need to enter MFA) we show more menu items than we should.
Notably, we may show some personalized/private account details, like the number of unread notifications (probably not relevant) or a user's saved queries (possibly sensitive). At best these are misleading (they won't work yet) and there's an outside possibility they leak a little bit of private data.
Instead, nuke everything except "Log Out" when users have partial sessions.
Test Plan:
Hit a partial session (MFA required, email verification required) and looked at the menu. Only saw "Log Out".
{F5297713}
Reviewers: amckinley
Reviewed By: amckinley
Maniphest Tasks: T13024
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D18793
Summary: Noticed a couple of typos in the docs, and then things got out of hand.
Test Plan:
- Stared at the words until my eyes watered and the letters began to swim on the screen.
- Consulted a dictionary.
Reviewers: #blessed_reviewers, epriestley
Reviewed By: #blessed_reviewers, epriestley
Subscribers: epriestley, yelirekim, PHID-OPKG-gm6ozazyms6q6i22gyam
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D18693
Summary: See PHI79. When you edit another user's SSH keys (normally, for a bot account) we currently redirect you to an older URI.
Test Plan:
- Viewed a bot's profile page.
- Clicked "Edit Settings" on the Manage page.
- Went to "SSH Keys".
- Uploaded an SSH key.
- Before: redirected to a 404 after finishing the workflow.
- After: redirected to the same page after the workflow.
Reviewers: amckinley
Reviewed By: amckinley
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D18633
Summary:
See brief discussion in D18554. All the index tables are the same for every application (and, at this point, seem unlikely to change) and we never actually pass these objects around (they're only used internally).
In some other cases (like Transactions) not every application has the same tables (for example, Differential has extra field for inline comments), and/or we pass the objects around (lots of stuff uses `$xactions` directly).
However, in this case, and in Edges, we don't interact with any representation of the database state directly in much of the code, and it doesn't change from application to application.
Just automatically define document, field, and ngram tables for anything which implements `FerretInterface`. This makes the query and index logic a tiny bit messier but lets us delete a ton of boilerplate classes.
Test Plan: Indexed objects, searched for objects. Same results as before with much less code. Ran `bin/storage upgrade`, got a clean bill of health.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T12819
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D18559
Summary:
Ref T12819. Adds support for indexing user accounts so they appear in global fulltext results.
Also, always rank users ahead of other results.
Test Plan: Indexed users. Searched for a user, got that user.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T12819
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D18552
Summary: Updates and clarifies UI
Test Plan: New peoples, new bots, new mailing list
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Spies: Korvin
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D18562
Summary:
Ref T12845. This is the last of the hard-coded types.
These are mostly used for values which users don't directly edit, so it's largely OK that they aren't carefully validated. In some cases, it would be good to introduce a separate validator eventually.
Test Plan: Edited, deleted and mangled these values via the web UI and CLI.
Reviewers: chad, amckinley
Reviewed By: amckinley
Maniphest Tasks: T12845
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D18164
Summary: Ran across a few straglers. Convert to the correct color.
Test Plan: grep for profile-image-button, check profile image selection page
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: Korvin
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D18096
Summary: Ref T12423. Set the grouping by priority. Note this doesn't render headers but I don't want to spend a lot of time on this.
Test Plan: Review tasks in my sandbox, see them ordered by priority.
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: Korvin
Maniphest Tasks: T12423
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D18046
Summary: I think this name is more accurate, also add proper links to author image.
Test Plan: Review commits in sandbox, see new URL on image.
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: Korvin
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D18026
Summary:
Fixes T12762. Currently, there's no way to get from these boxes into generaly history in Feed, and it isn't clear that the operation is possible.
For now, add some simple links. See T12762 for future work.
Test Plan:
- Viewed user profles, saw "View All".
- Viewed project profiles, saw "View All".
{F4978858}
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T12762
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D18030
Summary: Ref T12762. Updates some conventions and methods. This has no (meaningful) behavioral changes.
Test Plan:
- Grepped for `setFilterPHIDs()`.
- Viewed main feed, user feed, project feed.
- Called `feed.query`.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T12762
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D18027
Summary: Going to play a bit with this layout (diffusion sans audit) and see how it feels on profile. Uses a user image, moves the commit hash (easily selectible) and separates commits by date.
Test Plan:
Review profiles with and without commits.
{F4973987}
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: Korvin
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D18005
Summary: Ref T12423. Adds back revisions as a user profile page. I don't want to think about custom profiles for a while.
Test Plan: Make some diffs, visit my profile, see diffs.
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: Korvin
Maniphest Tasks: T12423
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D17987
Summary: Brings more UI tweaks to disabled objects, like projects/people. Also fixes a missing icon in projects.
Test Plan: Application search with people and projects that have disabled results.
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: Korvin
Maniphest Tasks: T12732
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D17962
Summary:
Ref T12635. See that task for discussion.
You can currently end up with a verified primary address but no "verified" flag on your account through an unusual sequence of address mutations.
Test Plan:
- Registered without verifying, using address "A".
- Added a second email address, address "B".
- Verified B (most easily with `bin/auth verify`).
- Changed my primary email to B.
- Before patch: account not verified.
- After patch: account verified.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T12635
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D17785
