Summary:
See some earlier discussion in D11593:
> One thing I'm vaguely thinking about is the possibilty that users may be able to invoice one another directly, eventually. For example, we might invoice a contracting client.
> We might need an `isInvoice` flag eventually, but `subscriptionPHID` is a reasonable stand-in for now.
This adds such a flag.
Test Plan:
- Generated an ad-hoc invoice and verified it showed up in the right place.
- Used `bin/phortune invoice` to invoice a subscription and verified it worked correctly.
- Paid an invoice and saw it leave "pending invoices" status.
{F377029}
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D12480
Summary:
Fixes T7601. Ref T7803, weakly (this removes a Query subclass with ad-hoc paging). Herald has a very old edit log which predates transactions and is essentially useless and not really policy-aware. I think it's doing more harm than good; remove it.
Herald rules have proper transactions, but rule edits don't currently render something nice into the transaction log. This is definitely the way forward, but we haven't seen requests for this so don't bother building it for now.
I did put a nice end-cap on the transaction log, though.
Test Plan:
- Viewed Herald UI.
- Grepped for removed classes and methods.
- Edited a rule.
- Viewed rule transaction log.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: cburroughs, chad, epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T7601, T7803
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D12346
Summary: These arrays looks a little odd, most likely due to the autofix applied by `ArcanistXHPASTLinter::LINT_ARRAY_SEPARATOR`. See D12296 in which I attempt to improve the autocorrection from this linter rule.
Test Plan: N/A
Reviewers: epriestley, #blessed_reviewers
Reviewed By: epriestley, #blessed_reviewers
Subscribers: epriestley
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D12281
Summary: Ref T7582. Also adds the basic logic for "rooms" implementation. Also makes sure we use the initializeNewThread method as appropriate.
Test Plan: made a new conpherence and it worked!
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: Korvin, epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T7582
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D12103
Summary: Fixes T7583. We also add `key_room`, which uses isRoom and dateModified since a very common view of rooms is going to be ordered by last updated.
Test Plan: made the conpherence view controller query specify `withIsRoom(true)` and `withIsRoom(false)`. The former made the controller correctly 404 while the latter had no change in functionality.
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: Korvin, epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T7583
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D12102
Summary:
Ref T7149. This flags allocated but incomplete files and doesn't explode when trying to download them.
Files are marked complete when the last chunk is uploaded.
I added a key on `<authorPHID, isPartial>` so we can show you a list of partially uploaded files and prompt you to resume them at some point down the road.
Test Plan: Massaged debugging settings and uploaded README.md very slowly in 32b chunks. Saw the file lose its "Partial" flag when the last chunk finished.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: joshuaspence, epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T7149
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D12063
Summary:
Ref T7149. This isn't complete and isn't active yet, but does basically work. I'll shore it up in the next few diffs.
The new workflow goes like this:
> Client, file.allocate(): I'd like to upload a file with length L, metadata M, and hash H.
Then the server returns `upload` (a boolean) and `filePHID` (a PHID). These mean:
| upload | filePHID | means |
|---|---|---|
| false | false | Server can't accept file.
| false | true | File data already known, file created from hash.
| true | false | Just upload normally.
| true | true | Query chunks to start or resume a chunked upload.
All but the last case are uninteresting and work like exising uploads with `file.uploadhash` (which we can eventually deprecate).
In the last case:
> Client, file.querychunks(): Give me a list of chunks that I should upload.
This returns all the chunks for the file. Chunks have a start byte, an end byte, and a "complete" flag to indicate that the server already has the data.
Then, the client fills in chunks by sending them:
> Client, file.uploadchunk(): Here is the data for one chunk.
This stuff doesn't work yet or has some caveats:
- I haven't tested resume much.
- Files need an "isPartial()" flag for partial uploads, and the UI needs to respect it.
- The JS client needs to become chunk-aware.
- Chunk size is set crazy low to make testing easier.
- Some debugging flags that I'll remove soon-ish.
- Downloading works, but still streams the whole file into memory.
- This storage engine is disabled by default (hardcoded as a unit test engine) because it's still sketchy.
- Need some code to remove the "isParital" flag when the last chunk is uploaded.
- Maybe do checksumming on chunks.
Test Plan:
- Hacked up `arc upload` (see next diff) to be chunk-aware and uploaded a readme in 18 32-byte chunks. Then downloaded it. Got the same file back that I uploaded.
- File UI now shows some basic chunk info for chunked files:
{F336434}
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: joshuaspence, epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T7149
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D12060
Summary:
Ref T7352. We were previously identifying things by `<daemonClass, overseerPID, startTime>` but that's not unique in a world where one overseer can run multiple daemons.
We already have an internal "daemonID", it just doesn't get written into the DB right now.
Start writing it, then use it to clean up `phd status`.
Test Plan: Ran `phd status`, got more accurate/useful output than previously.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T7352
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D11865
Summary:
Ref T6840. This feels a little dirty; open to alternate suggestions.
We currently have a race condition where multiple daemons may load a commit and then save it at the same time, when processing "reverts X" text. Prior to this feature, two daemons would never load a commit at the same time.
The "reverts X" load/save has no effect (doesn't change any object properties), but it will set the state back to the loaded state on save(). This overwrites any flag updates made to the commit in the meantime, and can produce the race in T6840.
In other cases (triggers, harbormaster, repositories) we deal with this kind of problem with "append-only-updates + single-consumer", or a bunch of locking. There isn't really a good place to add a single consumer for commits, since a lot of daemons need to access them. We could move the flags column to a separate table, but this feels pretty complicated. And locking is messy, also mostly because we have so many consumers.
Just exempting this column (which has unusual behavior) from `save()` feels OK-ish? I don't know if we'll have other use cases for this, and I like it even less if we never do, but this patch is pretty small and feels fairly understandable (that said, I also don't like that it can make some properties just silently not update if you aren't on the lookout).
So, this is //a// fix, and feels simplest/least-bad for the moment to me, I thiiink.
Test Plan: Added and executed unit tests.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T6840
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D11822
Summary: Fixes T7159.
Test Plan:
Created a legalpad document that needed a signature and I was required to sign it no matter what page I hit. Signed it and things worked! Added a new legalpad document and I had to sign again!
Ran unit tests and they passed!
Logged out as a user who was roadblocked into signing a bunch of stuff and it worked!
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: Korvin, epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T7159
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D11759
Summary:
Ref T7152. This implements the administrative UI for the upstream email invite workflow.
Pieces of this will be reused in Instances to implement the instance invite workflow, although some of it is probably going to be a bit copy/pastey.
This doesn't actually create or send invites yet, and they still can't be carried through registration.
Test Plan:
{F290970}
{F290971}
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T7152
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D11733
Summary:
Ref T7152. This builds the core of email invites and implements all the hard logic for them, covering it with a pile of tests.
There's no UI to create these yet, so users can't actually get invites (and administrators can't send them).
This stuff is a complicated mess because there are so many interactions between accounts, email addresses, email verification, email primary-ness, and user verification. However, I think I got it right and got test coverage everwhere.
The degree to which this is exception-driven is a little icky, but I think it's a reasonable way to get the testability we want while still making it hard for callers to get the flow wrong. In particular, I expect there to be at least two callers (one invite flow in the upstream, and one derived invite flow in Instances) so I believe there is merit in burying as much of this logic inside the Engine as is reasonably possible.
Test Plan: Unit tests only.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T7152
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D11723
Summary: Fixes T7153.
Test Plan:
used `bin/auth trust-oauth-client` and `bin/auth untrust-oauth-client` to set the bit and verify error states.
registered via oauth with `bin/auth trust-oauth-client` set and I did not have the confirmation screen
registered via oauth with `bin/auth untrust-oauth-client` set and I did have the confirmation screen
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: Korvin, epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T7153
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D11724
Summary: Ref T7153. I am not sure if this is 100% correct because sometimes you have to POST vs GET and I don't know if the redirect response will / can do the right thing? I think options to fix this would be to 1) restrict this functionality to JUST the Phabricator OAuth provider type or 2) something really fancy with an HTTP(S) future. The other rub right now is when you logout you get half auto-logged in again... Thoughts on that?
Test Plan: setup my local instance to JUST have phabricator oauth available to login. was presented with the dialog automagically...!
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: Korvin, epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T7153
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D11701
Summary:
I'm hitting this in the cluster and couldn't figure it out after staring at it for a couple minutes. Produce a better error.
This dumps a hash of each configuration key value which is set to a non-default value into the daemon log. This is much more compact than the full config, and doesn't spread secrets around, so it seems like a good balance between providing information and going crazy with it.
Test Plan: {F284139}
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D11699
Summary:
Ref T6881.
- Allow users to set a default payment method for a subscription, which we'll try to autobill (not all payment methods are autobillable, so we can't require this in the general case, and a charge might fail anyway).
- If a subscription has an autopay method, try to automatically bill it.
- Otherwise, we'll send them an email like "hey here's a bill, it couldn't autopay for some reasons, go pay it and fix those if you want".
- (That email doesn't exist yet but there's a comment about it.)
- Also some UI cleanup.
Test Plan:
- Used `bin/phortune invoice` to autobill myself some fake test money.
{F279416}
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T6881
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D11596
Summary:
Ref T6881. This generates a product, purchase and invoice for users, and there's sort of some UI for them. Stuff it doesn't do yet:
- Try to autobill when we have a CC;
- actually tell the user they should pay it;
- ask the application for anything like "how much should we charge", or tell the application anything like "the user paid".
However, these work:
- You can //technically// pay the invoices.
- You can see the invoices you paid in the past.
Test Plan: Used `bin/phriction invoice` to double-bill myself over and over again. Paid one of the invoices.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T6881
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D11580
Summary: Fixes T3404 (post D11565), fixes T5952. This infrastructure has been getting deployed against Maniphest and its time to get these other two applications going on it.
Test Plan: created an email address for paste and used `./bin/mail receive-test` ; a paste was successfully created
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: Korvin, epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T5952, T3404
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D11570
Summary: Ref T5952. This adds support for a "default author" and deploys it on Maniphest.
Test Plan: used augmented (by this diff) bin/mail receive-test to test creation via an application email with a default author configured and no author specified. a task was created with the author as the default author i configured.
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: Korvin, epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T5952
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D11446
Summary:
Ref T6881. This roughs in the major objects, support classes, and controllers.
- Show subscriptions on account detail.
- Browse all account subscriptions.
- Link to active subsciptions from merchant detail.
Test Plan: Clicked around in the UI. There's no way to create subscriptions yet, so I basically just kicked the tires on this. I probably missed a few things that I'll clean up in followups.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T6881
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D11482
Summary: Ref T5952, T3404. This lays the basic plumbing for how this will work, all the way to deploying on Maniphest. Aside from what is mentioned on T5952, I think page(s) on editing application emails could use a little more helpful text about what's going on, similar to how the config page that's getting deprecated works.
Test Plan: ran migration and noted my create email address migrated successfully. used bin/mail to make a task. added another email and used bin/mail to make a task. deleted an email. edited an email. invoked various error states and they all looked good.
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: Korvin, epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T3404, T5952
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D11418
Summary:
Ref T6881. Hopefully, this is the hard part.
This adds a new daemon (the "trigger" daemon) which processes triggers, schedules them, and then executes them at the scheduled time. The design is a little complicated, but has these goals:
- High resistance to race conditions: only the application writes to the trigger table; only the daemon writes to the event table. We won't lose events if someone saves a meeting at the same time as we're sending a reminder out for it.
- Execution guarantees: scheduled events are guaranteed to execute exactly once.
- Support for arbitrarily large queues: the daemon will make progress even if there are millions of triggers in queue. The cost to update the queue is proportional to the number of changes in it; the cost to process the queue is proportional to the number of events to execute.
- Relatively good observability: you can monitor the state of the trigger queue reasonably well from the web UI.
- Modular Infrastructure: this is a very low-level construct that Calendar, Phortune, etc., should be able to build on top of.
It doesn't have this stuff yet:
- Not very robust to bad actions: a misbehaving trigger can stop the queue fairly easily. This is OK for now since we aren't planning to make it part of any other applications for a while. We do still get execute-exaclty-once, but it might not happen for a long time (until someone goes and fixes the queue), when we could theoretically continue executing other events.
- Doesn't start automatically: normal users don't need to run this thing yet so I'm not starting it by default.
- Not super well tested: I've vetted the basics but haven't run real workloads through this yet.
- No sophisticated tooling: I added some basic stuff but it's missing some pieces we'll have to build sooner or later, e.g. `bin/trigger cancel` or whatever.
- Intentionally not realtime: This design puts execution guarantees far above realtime concerns, and will not give you precise event execution at 1-second resolution. I think this is the correct goal to pursue architecturally, and certainly correct for subscriptions and meeting reminders. Events which execute after they have become irrelevant can simply decline to do anything (like a meeting reminder which executes after the meeting is over).
In general, the expectation for applications is:
- When creating an object (like a calendar event) that needs to trigger a scheduled action, write a trigger (and save the PHID if you plan to update it later).
- The daemon will process the event and schedule the action efficiently, in a race-free way.
- If you want to move the action, update the trigger and the daemon will take care of it.
- Your action will eventually dump a task into the task queue, and the task daemons will actually perform it.
Test Plan:
Using a test script like this:
```
<?php
require_once 'scripts/__init_script__.php';
$trigger = id(new PhabricatorWorkerTrigger())
->setAction(
new PhabricatorLogTriggerAction(
array(
'message' => 'test',
)))
->setClock(
new PhabricatorMetronomicTriggerClock(
array(
'period' => 33,
)))
->save();
var_dump($trigger);
```
...I queued triggers and ran the daemon:
- Verified triggers fire;
- verified triggers reschedule;
- verified trigger events show up in the web UI;
- tried different periods;
- added some triggers while the daemon was running;
- examined `phd debug` output for anything suspicious.
It seems to work in trivial use case, at least.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T6881
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D11419
Summary: ...also adds policies on who can view and who can edit an action. Fixes T6949.
Test Plan: viewed a secret through the new UI and it worked
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: Korvin, epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T6949
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D11401
Summary:
Ref T3165. Builds a dedicated index for Conpherence to avoid scale/policy filtering concerns.
- This is pretty one-off but I think it's generally OK.
- There's no UI for it.
- `ConpherenceFulltextQuery` is very low-level. You would need to do another query on the PHIDs it returns to actually show anything to the user.
- The `previousTransactionPHID` is so you can load chat context efficiently. Specifically, if you want to show results like this:
> previous line of context
> **line of chat that matches the query**
> next line of context
...you can read the previous lines out of `previousTransactionPHID` directly, and the next lines by issuing one query with `WHERE previousTransactionPHID IN (...)`.
I'm not 100% sure this is useful, but it seemed like a reasonable thing to provide, since there's no way to query this efficiently otherwise and I figure a lot of chat might make way more sense with a couple of lines of context.
Test Plan:
- Indexed a thread manually (whole thing indexed).
- Indexed a thread by updating it (just the new comment indexed).
- Wrote a hacky test script and got reasonable-looking query results.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T3165
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D11234
Summary: Ref T5655. Fixes T6849. This is another take on D11131, which was missing the DB migration and was reverted in rP7c4de0f6be77ddaea593e1f41ae27211ec179a55.
Test Plan: Ran `./bin/storage upgrade` and verified that the classes were renamed in the `phabricator_policy.policy` table.
Reviewers: #blessed_reviewers, epriestley
Reviewed By: #blessed_reviewers, epriestley
Subscribers: Korvin, epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T6849, T5655
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D11166
Summary: This class is no longer used after D10965.
Test Plan: `grep`
Reviewers: btrahan, epriestley, #blessed_reviewers
Reviewed By: epriestley, #blessed_reviewers
Subscribers: Korvin, epriestley
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D11133
Summary: Modernize remaining edges to subclass `PhabricatorEdgeType`. Largely based on D11045.
Test Plan: Browsed around and performed various actions include subscribing, unsubscribing and watching.
Reviewers: #blessed_reviewers, epriestley
Reviewed By: #blessed_reviewers, epriestley
Subscribers: epriestley
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D11116
Summary: Modernize Project edges to subclass `PhabricatorEdgeType`. Largely based on D11045.
Test Plan: Add a member to a project, saw new rows in the `phabricator_project.edge` and `phabricator_user.edge` tables.
Reviewers: epriestley, #blessed_reviewers
Reviewed By: epriestley, #blessed_reviewers
Subscribers: Korvin, epriestley
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D11111
Summary: Modernize Differential edges to subclass `PhabricatorEdgeType`. Largely based on D11045.
Test Plan: From previous experience, these changes are fairly trivial and safe. I poked around a little to make sure things looked reasonably okay.
Reviewers: epriestley, #blessed_reviewers
Reviewed By: epriestley, #blessed_reviewers
Subscribers: Korvin, Krenair, epriestley
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D11074
Summary: T5549
Test Plan: Set edit policy on paste, check that only users meeting the policy requirements can edit it.
Reviewers: epriestley, #blessed_reviewers
Reviewed By: epriestley, #blessed_reviewers
Subscribers: Korvin, epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T5549
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D11097
Summary: Ref T5402. This more or less "fixes" it but there's probably some polish to do?
Test Plan:
stopped and started daemons. error logs look good.
ran bin/storage upgrade. noted that `adjust` added the appropriate indices for active and archive task.
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: Korvin, epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T5402
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D11044
Summary:
Fixes T5196
If no phd.user is configured the behaviour is unchanged besides printing a warning when run as root (Usually i would add an exit(1) here but that would break existing installs who do that).
If phd.user is set and the current user is root it will run the daemon as: su USER -c "command" (I'm not sure if this works for every platform needed)
Otherwise it will refuse to start if configured and current user mismatch.
Test Plan: Stopped & Started phd daemon with various users and different phd.user settings including root
Reviewers: #blessed_reviewers, epriestley
Reviewed By: #blessed_reviewers, epriestley
Subscribers: vinzent, epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T5196
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D11036
Summary: database migration + drop old view code. Fixes T5604.
Test Plan: grepped src/ for TYPE_CCS (no hits); viewed some tasks with old cc transactions and noted they still rendered correctly post data conversion
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: Korvin, epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T5604
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D11015
Summary:
Fixes T6741. This allows Almanac services to be locked from the CLI. Locked services (and their bindings, interfaces and devices) can not be edited. This serves two similar use cases:
- For normal installs, you can protect cluster configuration from an attacker who compromises an account (or generally harden services which are intended to be difficult to edit).
- For Phacility, we can lock externally-managed instance cluster configuration without having to pull any spooky tricks.
Test Plan:
- Locked and unlocked services.
- Verified locking a service locks connected properties, bindings, binding properties, interfaces, devices, and device properties.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T6741
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D11006
Summary:
Ref T5833. This allows services to be typed, to distinguish between different kinds of services. This makes a few things easier:
- It's easier for clients to select the services they're interested in (see note in T5873 about Phacility). This isn't a full-power solution, but gets is some of the way there.
- It's easier to set appropriate permissions around when modifications to the Phabricator cluster are allowed. These service nodes need to be demarcated as special in some way no matter what (see T6741). This also defines a new policy for users who are permitted to create services.
- It's easier to browse/review/understand services.
- Future diffs will allow ServiceTypes to specify more service structure (for example, default properties) to make it easier to configure services correctly. Instead of a free-for-all, you'll get a useful list of things that consumers of the service expect to read.
The "custom" service type allows unstructured/freeform services to be created.
Test Plan:
- Created a new service (and hit error cases).
- Edited an existing service.
- Saw service types on list and detail views.
- Poked around new permission stuff.
- Ran `almanac.queryservices` with service class specification.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T5833
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10995
Summary:
Ref T5955. Summary of intended changes:
**Improve Granularity of Authorization**: Currently, users have one Conduit Certificate. This isn't very flexible, and means that you can't ever generate an API token with limited permissions or IP block controls (see T6706). This moves toward a world where you can generate multiple tokens, revoke them individually, and assign disparate privileges to them.
**Standardize Token Management**: This moves Conduit to work the same way that sessions, OAuth authorizations, and temporary tokens already work, instead of being this crazy bizarre mess.
**Make Authentication Faster**: Authentication currently requires a handshake (conduit.connect) to establish a session, like the web UI. This is unnecessary from a security point of view and puts an extra round trip in front of all Conduit activity. Essentially no other API anywhere works like this.
**Make Authentication Simpler**: The handshake is complex, and involves deriving hashes. The session is also complex, and creates issues like T4377. Handshake and session management require different inputs.
**Make Token Management Simpler**: The certificate is this huge long thing right now, which is not necessary from a security perspective. There are separate Arcanist handshake tokens, but they have a different set of issues. We can move forward to a token management world where neither of these problems exist.
**Lower Protocol Barrier**: The simplest possible API client is very complex right now. It should be `curl`. Simplifying authentication is a necessary step toward this.
**Unblock T2783**: T2783 is blocked on nodes in the cluster making authenticated API calls to other nodes. This provides a simpler way forward than the handshake mess (or enormous-hack-mess) which would currently be required.
Test Plan:
- Generated tokens.
- Generated tokens for a bot account.
- Terminated tokens (and for a bot account).
- Terminated all tokens (and for a bot account).
- Ran GC and saw it reap all the expired tokens.
NOTE: These tokens can not actually be used to authenticate yet!
{F249658}
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T5955
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10985
Summary:
Ref T2783. This is primarily exploratory and just figuring out what we're blocked on:
- Allow a Repository to be bound to a Service. The Service may eventually define multiple read/write nodes, etc.
- There's no UI to do this binding yet, you have to touch the database manually.
- If a repository is bound to a Service, effect Conduit calls via calls to the remote service instead of executing them in-process.
- These don't actually work yet since there's no authentication (see T5955).
Test Plan:
- Made a nice Service with a nice Binding to a nice Interface on a nice Device.
- Force-associated a repository with the service using a raw MySQL query.
- Saw Phabricator try to make a remote call to the service (on localhost) and fail because of missing auth stuff.
- Also ran `almanac.queryservices`.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T2783
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10982
Summary: Fixes T5604. This should fix some random bugs, lets us move forward more easily, and all that good stuff about killing code debt.
Test Plan:
- Conduit method maniphest.createtask
- verified creating user subscribed
- verified subscription transaction
- Conduit method maniphest.update
- verified subscribers set as specified to ccPHIDs parameter
- verified subscription transaction
- Herald
- verified herald rule to add subscriber worked
- verified no subscribers removed accidentally
- edit controller
- test create and verify author gets added IFF they put themselves in subscribers control box
- test update gets set to exactly what user enters
- lipsum generator'd tasks work
- bulk add subscribers works
- bulk remove subscriber works
- detail controller
- added myself by leaving a comment
- added another user via explicit action
- added another user via implicit mention
- task merge via search attach controller
- mail reply handler
- add subscriber via ./bin/mail receive-test
- unsubscribe via ./bin/mail receive-test
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: Korvin, epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T5604
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10965
Summary:
Ref T6615. Mixing ASC and DESC ordering on a multipart key makes it dramatically less effective (or perhaps totally ineffective).
Reverse the meaning of the `priority` column so it goes in the same direction as the `id` column (both ascending, lower values execute sooner).
Test Plan:
- Queued 1.2M tasks with `bin/worker flood`.
- Processed ~1 task/second with `bin/phd debug taskmaster` before patch.
- Applied patch, took ~5 seconds for ~1.2M rows.
- Processed ~100-200 tasks/second with `bin/phd debug taskmaster` after patch.
- "Next in Queue" query on daemon page dropped from 1.5s to <1ms.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: aklapper, 20after4, epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T6615
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10895
Summary:
Ref T6240. Some discussion in that task. In instance/cluster environments, daemons need to make Conduit calls that bypass policy checks.
We can't just let anyone add SSH keys with this capability to the web directly, because then an adminstrator could just add a key they own and start signing requests with it, bypassing policy checks.
Add a `bin/almanac trust-key --id <x>` workflow for trusting keys. Only trusted keys can sign requests.
Test Plan:
- Generated a user key.
- Generated a device key.
- Trusted a device key.
- Untrusted a device key.
- Hit the various errors on trust/untrust.
- Tried to edit a trusted key.
{F236010}
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T6240
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10878
Summary: Fixes T3189. Now if you say #projects in a commit message they will associate nicely with the commit. Also we record transactions about all this project editing fun.
Test Plan: tested migration by associating some projects with commits and verifying they still showed up post migration. tested adding / removing projects by doing so from the UI, noting transactions written nicely as well
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: Korvin, epriestley
Projects: #projects
Maniphest Tasks: T3189
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10877
Summary: Fixes T6152, T6237. This introduces a viewPolicy column to the DifferentialDiff, and re-jiggers the DifferentialDiff policy implementation such that things behave as before once associated with a revision, else use the DifferentialDiff policy column value.
Test Plan: made a diff with a non-standard view policy and noted that policy was still selected in the revision step. arc lint.
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: Korvin, epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T6237, T6152
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10875
Summary: Ref T6237. This sets us up for some future work like T6152, T6200 and generally cleaning up this workflow a bit. Tried to do as little as possible so not exposing transaction view yet. (Though that timeline is going to be a little funky in the common case of just the lone create transaction.)
Test Plan: made a diff from web ui and it worked. made a herald rule to block certain diffs then tried to make such a diff and saw UI letting me know i was blocked
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: Korvin, epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T6237
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10869
Summary: Fixes T1768. This is mostly a data cleanliness issue as duplicate rows don't really do anything, but let's clear it up now.
Test Plan: made some duplicate rows by adding the same auditor multiple times. ran ./bin/storage upgrade and it worked perfectly!
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: Korvin, epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T1768
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10849
Summary: See <https://github.com/phacility/phabricator/issues/760>. We removed these methods in D10832 but still need the migration to be able to do project checks.
Test Plan: Ran on a test wiki with `/`, `/projects/` and `/projects/example/`. The first two pages didn't try to use project policies; the third one did.
Reviewers: btrahan, chad
Reviewed By: chad
Subscribers: epriestley
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10836
We have at least one project with `null` as a viewPolicy. This should get
sorted out separately, but make the migration robust against it.
Auditors: btrahan
