Summary:
Ref T4807. This doesn't actually do anything yet, but adds a dropdown menu for choosing an ordering and gets all the UI working correctly.
This also fixes a bug where column hidden state wouldn't persist across filter changes.
(I won't land this until it does something, but the next diff will probably be a mess so this seemed like a clean place to sever things.)
Test Plan:
{F187114}
- Altered sort ordering.
- Altered hidden state and filters, verified all states persisted correctly.
- Added `phlog()` to edit/create and move controllers and verified they receive sort information.
Reviewers: btrahan, chad
Reviewed By: chad
Subscribers: swisspol, chad, epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T4807
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10178
Summary:
Ref T5245. This removes some hacks and activates two meaningful interactions:
- The "projects" field goes through shared code now.
- Mentioning projects in tasks using hashtags now tags them.
Test Plan:
- Viewed a task with projects.
- Viewed a task with no projects.
- Viewed a task with projects and board positions.
- Viewed a revision with projects.
- Made a `#hashtag` comment in Maniphest and got a project association.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T5245
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10177
Summary: Use cutlery icon for hilarity. Ref T5768.
Test Plan: made something with remarkup in it, used 'view raw' and saw the remarkup raw in a nice little dialogue.
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: epriestley, Korvin
Maniphest Tasks: T5768
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10183
Summary:
Currently, we'll try to publish notifications while running tests. This is at best unnecessary and at worst problematic (we don't stub out the server).
For now, just never publish them.
Test Plan: Ran unit tests with notifications enabled but the server down and didn't get a bunch of warnings.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10171
Summary:
Fixes T5476. Using edges to store which objects are on which board columns ends up being pretty awkward. In particular, it makes T4807 very difficult to implement.
Introduce a dedicated `BoardColumnPosition` storage.
This doesn't affect ordering rules (T4807) yet: boards are still arranged by priority. We just read which tasks are on which columns out of a new table.
Test Plan:
- Migrated data, then viewed some boards. Saw exactly the same data.
- Dragged tasks from column to column.
- Created a task directly into a column.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T5476
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10160
Summary: Currently, we just create a default "backlog" column if / when you visit a workboard for the first time. Post this patch, instead you see a blocking dialog that lets you either create the default backlog column or import columns from another project. In the case of the latter, the user gets another dialog which lets them select any project of which they are a member that also has columns in it. Note that only not hidden columns get imported. Fixes T4431.
Test Plan:
- made a new workboard and got my new dialog. made a default backlog and it worked!
- made a new workboard again and tried the import flow - it also worked.
- verified projects with no columns do not show up in import dialog
- verified project with / without columns still all show up in maniphest project typeahead
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: epriestley, Korvin
Maniphest Tasks: T4431
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10153
Summary:
Ref T5506. This makes it easier to understand and manage temporary tokens.
Eventually this could be more user-friendly, since it's relatively difficult to understand what this screen means. My short-term goal is just to make the next change easier to implement and test.
The next diff will close a small security weakness: if you change your email address, password reset links which were sent to the old address are still valid. Although an attacker would need substantial access to exploit this (essentially, it would just make it easier for them to re-compromise an already compromised account), it's a bit surprising. In the next diff, email address changes will invalidate outstanding password reset links.
Test Plan:
- Viewed outstanding tokens.
- Added tokens to the list by making "Forgot your password?" requests.
- Revoked tokens individually.
- Revoked all tokens.
- Tried to use a revoked token.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T5506
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10133
Summary:
Ref T4896. Now that we have a transaction editor, we can delete a giant block of hacks.
I believe this also resolves the commit/task attachment issues @joshuaspence and @mbishopim3 mentioned.
Test Plan: Attached and detached commits and tasks.
Reviewers: btrahan, joshuaspence, mbishopim3
Reviewed By: mbishopim3
Subscribers: mbishopim3, epriestley, joshuaspence
Maniphest Tasks: T4896
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10138
Summary: Ref T4589. Allow users to adjust visibility settings on files explicitly. This makes it easier to understand and manage upcoming changes in T4589.
Test Plan: Changed the view policy for a file several times.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T4589
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10129
Summary: Ref T4896. This converts the last "CommentEditor" to a transaction editor and removes a large part of the old code.
Test Plan:
- Added comments.
- Accepted / added auditors.
- Added inline comments.
Reviewers: joshuaspence, btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T4896
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10128
Summary: This class was renamed in D9991 but the filename is incorrect.
Test Plan: Eyeball it
Reviewers: epriestley, #blessed_reviewers
Reviewed By: epriestley, #blessed_reviewers
Subscribers: epriestley, Korvin
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10118
Summary:
Ref T4896. Replaces more custom stuff with standard stuff. In particular:
- No more fake proxy writes;
- no more fake detection of `@mentions`.
For now, the old code still applies most of the effects and handles feed and email.
Test Plan:
- Added comments.
- Added comments with inline comments.
- Added just inline comments.
- Added comments with Conduit.
- Previewed comments.
- Added CCs explicitly and with `@mentions`.
- Added auditors.
- Accepted a commit.
Reviewers: joshuaspence, btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T4896
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10109
Summary:
Ref T4896. Currently, subscriptions to commits are stored as auditors with a special "CC" type.
Instead, use normal subscriptions storage, reads and writes.
Test Plan:
- Ran migration and verified data still looked good.
- Viewed commits in UI and saw "subscribers".
- Saw "Automatically Subscribed", clicked Subscribe/Unsubscribe on a non-authored commit, saw subscriptions update.
- Pushed a commit through Herald rules and saw them trigger subscriptions and auditors.
- Used "Add CCs".
- Added CCs with mentions.
Reviewers: btrahan, joshuaspence
Reviewed By: btrahan, joshuaspence
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T4896
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10103
Summary: This class was renamed in D9991, but the filename is incorrect.
Test Plan: Eyeball it
Reviewers: epriestley, #blessed_reviewers
Reviewed By: epriestley, #blessed_reviewers
Subscribers: epriestley, Korvin
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10117
Summary: We've received feedback that the "core - exception" is incredibly confusing, to the point where developers see this and write off the build failure as a Phabricator error that is unrelated to their changes.
Test Plan: Ran a build with a `exit 1` run step, didn't see the "core - exception" appear.
Reviewers: epriestley, #blessed_reviewers
Reviewed By: epriestley, #blessed_reviewers
Subscribers: epriestley, Korvin
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10090
Summary:
Depends on D9806. This implements the build simulator, which is used to calculate the order of build steps in the plan editor. This includes a migration script to convert existing plans from sequential based to dependency based, and then drops the sequence column.
Because build plans are now dependency based, the grippable and re-order behaviour has been removed.
Test Plan: Tested the migration, saw the dependencies appear correctly.
Reviewers: epriestley, #blessed_reviewers
Reviewed By: epriestley, #blessed_reviewers
Subscribers: epriestley, Korvin
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D9847
Summary: Ref T4896. Depends on D10055. This uses core rendering stuff for audit comments, and fixes all the wonkiness with inlines so we can actually land the migration.
Test Plan: Viewed, previewed and edited various types of comments in Diffusion.
Reviewers: chad, btrahan, joshuaspence
Reviewed By: joshuaspence
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T4896
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10056
Summary:
Ref T4896. Depends on D10052. This is the major/scary migration, but not really so bad. It is substantially similar to D8210, but less complex because there are fewer actions here.
This moves `PhabricatorAuditComment` storage to `PhabricatorAuditTransaction`, then reads `PhabricatorAuditComment`s as a proxy around the new objects.
Test Plan:
- Before migrating, browsed around. Nothing appeared broken.
- Migrated cleanly.
- Viewed old transactions (inlines, comments, accept/reject/etc, add auditors, add ccs, implicit CCs).
- Added all of those comment types.
- Edited a draft.
- Deleted a draft.
- Spot checked the database for sanity.
Reviewers: btrahan, joshuaspence
Reviewed By: joshuaspence
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T4896
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10055
Summary: Fixes T5695. A Conduit "method does not exist" exception is somewhat expected... there is no need to `phlog` the exception.
Test Plan: Called a non-existent Conduit method. Saw no exceptions in the error logs.
Reviewers: #blessed_reviewers, epriestley
Reviewed By: #blessed_reviewers, epriestley
Subscribers: epriestley, Korvin
Maniphest Tasks: T5695
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10042
Summary:
Ref T4896. This is substantially identical to the process which Differential followed, and mostly copied from the original Differential migration and the Differential proxy object.
Basically, we move all the data over but the application can't tell, and the same APIs do reads and writes to the new table.
Test Plan:
- Browsed UI before migrating, everything looked fine (but no inlines).
- Ran migration.
- Verified draft and published comments survived migration.
- Added a draft.
- Previewed draft.
- Submitted draft.
- Viewed standalone with drafts and published comments.
- Sanity checked data in database, didn't see anything unusual.
Reviewers: btrahan, joshuaspence
Reviewed By: joshuaspence
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T4896
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10018
Summary:
Ref T4896. This adds the new storage, without any code changes.
This storage is substantially identical to the Differential storage, except that `changesetID` has been replaced by `pathID`.
I've retained the properties intended to be used to implement T1460. They might not be quite right, but at least we'll be able to make any fixes consistently to both applications. For now, these fields are empty and ignored.
Test Plan: Ran `./bin/storage upgrade`. Nothing calls this code yet.
Reviewers: btrahan, joshuaspence
Reviewed By: joshuaspence
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T4896
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10017
Summary: Ref T5655. Rename `PhabricatorPHIDType` subclasses for clarity (see discussion in D9839). I'm not too keen on some of the resulting class names, so feel free to suggest alternatives.
Test Plan: Ran unit tests.
Reviewers: epriestley, #blessed_reviewers
Reviewed By: epriestley, #blessed_reviewers
Subscribers: epriestley, Korvin, hach-que
Maniphest Tasks: T5655
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D9986
Summary:
Ref T2787. Carts need a status so we can tell if they've been purchased. Also kind of get WePay working as a one-time provider, and let charges not have a methodPHID (they won't for one-time providers).
All the status stuff is still super crazy rough and you can do things like start a checkout, add a bunch of stuff to your cart, complete the checkout, and have Phabricator think you paid for all the stuff you added. But this is fine for now since you can't actually edit carts, and also none of this is at all usable anyway. I'll refine some of the workflows in future diffs, for now I'm just getting things hooked up and technically working.
Test Plan:
- Purcahsed a cart and got a sort of status/done screen instead of a "your money is gone" exception.
- Went through the WePay flow and got a successful test checkout.
Reviewers: btrahan, chad
Reviewed By: chad
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T2787
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10003
Summary: Ref T2787. Makes charges a real object, allows providers to apply them. We are now (just barely) capable of stealing users' money.
Test Plan: {F179584}
Reviewers: btrahan, chad
Reviewed By: chad
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T2787
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10002
Summary:
Ref T2787. Make carts and purchases real objects, with storage, that kind-of work.
Roughly, the idea here is that applications create "purchases" (like "1 large t-shirt") and add them to "carts" (a user can have a lot of different carts at the same time), then hand things off to Phortune to deal with actualy charging a card. Roughly this works like Paypal or other similar systems do, except Phortune is the thing the user gets handed off to.
This doesn't do anything interesting/useful yet.
Also fix some bugs and update some UI.
Test Plan: Added a product to a cart, saw it in cart screen.
Reviewers: btrahan, chad
Reviewed By: chad
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T2787
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10001
Summary: Ref T5655. Some discussion in D9839. Generally speaking, `Phabricator{$name}Application` is clearer than `PhabricatorApplication{$name}`.
Test Plan:
# Pinned and uninstalled some applications.
# Applied patch and performed migrations.
# Verified that the pinned applications were still pinned and that the uninstalled applications were still uninstalled.
# Performed a sanity check on the database contents.
Reviewers: btrahan, epriestley, #blessed_reviewers
Reviewed By: epriestley, #blessed_reviewers
Subscribers: hach-que, epriestley, Korvin
Maniphest Tasks: T5655
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D9982
Summary: Ref T5655. It is superfluous to include "base" in the name of an abstract base class. Furthermore, it is not done consistently within the code base.
Test Plan: Ran `arc unit`.
Reviewers: epriestley, #blessed_reviewers
Reviewed By: epriestley, #blessed_reviewers
Subscribers: epriestley, Korvin
Maniphest Tasks: T5655
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D9989
Summary: Ref T5655. The `PhabricatorDestructibleInterface` interface is misspelled as `PhabricatorDestructableInterface`. Fix the spelling mistake.
Test Plan: `grep`. Seeing as this interface is fairly recent, I don't expect that this would cause any widespread breakages.
Reviewers: epriestley, #blessed_reviewers
Reviewed By: epriestley, #blessed_reviewers
Subscribers: epriestley, Korvin
Maniphest Tasks: T5655
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D9988
Summary: Fixes T5659. When building a token after a user selection, we currently use the `value` as the token text, but sometimes that's an internal name which doesn't make much sense to users. For projects, it is now "sluga slugb Proper Display Name". If available, use `displayName` instead.
Test Plan: Typed some projects into a tokenizer, got display names only.
Reviewers: chad, joshuaspence
Reviewed By: joshuaspence
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T5659
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D9996
Summary: Ref T4420. This one is users plus "upforgrabs". I renamed that to "none" and gave it a special visual style to make it more discoverable. Future diffs will improve this.
Test Plan:
- Used it in global search.
- Used it in batch editor.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T4420
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D9891
Summary: Ref T4420. Bring the global search up to date.
Test Plan: Typed various things into global search.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T4420
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D9889
Summary: Ref T4420. Call this "auditor" since that's what it is.
Test Plan:
- Edited auditors in auditor search.
- Edited auditors in "add auditors" in Diffusion.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T4420
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D9888
Summary: Ref T4420. These are used for some stuff like "reviewer".
Test Plan:
- Edited "reviewers" in differential edit.
- Edited "reviewers" in differential search.
- Edited "reviewers" in Differential "add reviewers..." action on detail page.
- Edited a "reviewers" field in a herald rule.
- Edited "owner" in owners search.
- Edited "primary owner", "owners" on owners edit.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T4420
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D9887
Summary:
Ref T5245. We'll still display the old ones, but write real edge transactions now -- not TYPE_PROJECTS transactions.
Some code remains to show the existing transactions. The next diff will modernize the old transactions so we can remove this code.
Test Plan:
- Previewed a project-editing comment.
- Submitted a project-editing comment.
- Edited a task's projects.
- Batch edited a task's projects.
Reviewers: joshuaspence, chad, btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T5245
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D9852
Summary: Ref T5245. Updates the project/object edge to use a modern class definition. Moves further toward real edges.
Test Plan: Added projects to some objects, viewed transactions in transaction record.
Reviewers: chad, btrahan, joshuaspence
Reviewed By: joshuaspence
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T5245
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D9849
Summary: Ref T5245. With work elsewhere (notably, D9839) we can remove this TODO and use real transactions.
Test Plan: Pushed a `closes Txxx` commit and got a close + transaction.
Reviewers: chad, btrahan, joshuaspence
Reviewed By: joshuaspence
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T5245
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D9848
Summary:
Ref T5245. These were a bad idea.
We no longer need actors for edge edits either, so remove those. Generally, edges have fit into the policy model as pure/low-level infrastructure, and they do not have any policy or capability information in and of themselves.
Test Plan: `grep`
Reviewers: chad, btrahan, joshuaspence
Reviewed By: joshuaspence
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T5245
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D9840
Summary:
Ref T5245. See some discussion in D9838.
When we attach object A to object B, we'd like to write transactions on both sides but only write the actual edges once.
To do this, allow edge types to `shouldWriteInverseTransactions()`. When an edge type opts into this, have editors apply the inverse transactions before writing the edge. These inverse transactions don't actually apply effects, they just show up in the transaction log.
Test Plan: Attached and detached revisions from tasks, saw transactions appear on both sides of the operation.
Reviewers: chad, btrahan, joshuaspence
Reviewed By: btrahan, joshuaspence
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T5245
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D9839
Summary:
Ref T5245. A very long time ago I had this terrible idea that we'd let objects react to edges being added and insert transactions in response.
This turned out to be a clearly bad idea very quickly, for like 15 different reasons. A big issue is that it inverts the responsibilities of editors. It's also just clumsy and messy.
We now have `PhabricatorApplicationTransactionInterface` instead, which mostly provides a cleaner way to deal with this.
Implement `PhabricatorApplicationTransactionInterface`, implicitly moving all the attach actions (task/task, task/revision, task/commit, task/mock) to proper edge transactions.
The cost of this is that the inverse edges don't write transactions -- if you attach an object to another object, only the object you were acting on posts a transaction record. This is sort of buggy anyway already. I'll fix this in the next diff.
Test Plan: Attached tasks, revisions and mocks to a task, then detached them.
Reviewers: chad, btrahan, joshuaspence
Reviewed By: joshuaspence
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T5245
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D9838
Summary:
Ref T5245. I want to add a new capability to edge types, which is a good opportunity to move away from `PhabricatorEdgeConfig`, which isn't modular.
This is basically the same as the modularization of PHID types, which has worked well. Add `PhabricatorEdgeType` and provide an adaption layer for the existing code.
This has no runtime changes, except the fixed edge constant.
Test Plan: Ran `var_dump(PhabricatorEdgeType::getAllTypes())` and got reasonable looking output.
Reviewers: chad, btrahan, joshuaspence
Reviewed By: joshuaspence
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T5245
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D9837
Summary: Fixes T5651. Sometime we'll send an object to the notification server for `subscribers`, which it will choke on. Use `array_values()` to make sure we're sending an array.
Test Plan: With `(object)` instead, got a consistent error ("no .filter method on object"). With `array_values()`, no error.
Reviewers: joshuaspence
Reviewed By: joshuaspence
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T5651
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D9963
Summary:
I think this pretty much does what you would expect?
The "active" item is always at the top of the stack.
Test Plan: Called `phrequent.tracking` and got reasonable results.
Reviewers: hach-que
Reviewed By: hach-que
Subscribers: epriestley
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D9939
Summary: These have been moved into libphutil.
Test Plan: Browsed Phabricator, didn't see a crash.
Reviewers: #blessed_reviewers, epriestley
Reviewed By: #blessed_reviewers, epriestley
Subscribers: epriestley, Korvin
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D9907
