Summary: Ref T2009. Upgrade this from DetailView to ListView so we get "Highlight As", "View Unified", etc., and respect the unified diff prefernce.
Test Plan: Viewed diffs in Phriction.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T2009
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D12013
Summary:
Fixes T4452. Ref T2009. There's a hierarchy of changeset rendering power: only low-level calls, use of ChangesetDetailView, then use of ChangesetListView (a list of DetailViews).
Prior to work here, the various changeset rendering controllers got their hands dirty to varying degrees, with some using only the lowest-level rendering pipeline:
- Phriction: no view (lowest level)
- Diffusion: DetailView
- Differential Changeset: DetailView
- Differential Diff: ListView
- Differential Revision: ListView
I brought Phriction up to use DetailView, but want to bring everything all the way up to use ListView. Each composition layer adds more features to diff browsing. In particular, this change enables "Highlight As", switching 1up vs 2up, adding inlines, etc., on the standalone view.
Test Plan:
- Viewed a changeset standalone. Could change highlighting, switch 1up vs 2up, add and edit inlines, etc.
- Viewed a revision; no behavioral changes.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T4452, T2009
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D12012
Summary: Fixes T7513. This is consistent with the behavior of an OS scrollbar.
Test Plan: Scrolled with haunting.
Reviewers: btrahan, chad
Reviewed By: chad
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T7513
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D12020
Summary: Fixes T7496, T7511. Sets text for registration is not enabled, sets can_manage on add_provider button.
Test Plan: Test with a logged in admin and logged in normal joe user.
Reviewers: btrahan, epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: Korvin, epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T7496, T7511
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D12014
Summary:
Ref T2009. Currently, the code figures out if a comment is on the left or right by looking at the `<th />` preceeding the enclosing `<td />`.
This gets the right result in 2-up, but in 1-up rows are always `<th />`, `<th />`, `<td />`, so it always detects every inline as being in the new file.
Because "old" and "new" cells aren't inherently distingushable in the 1up view, we can't use a DOM test for this at all. Instead, just track this state explicitly.
Test Plan:
- Made left/right comments in 1up view and 2up view.
- Viewed them in 1up and 2up views.
- Hovered in 1up and 2up views.
- Diff-of-diff'd and reviewed old/new comments, then made some more.
Reviewers: btrahan, chad
Reviewed By: chad
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T2009
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D12011
Summary:
Ref T2009. Right now, when you mouse over a line number, we change the cursor to a "pointer", but that's the only hint we provide about the existence of inline comments.
Occasionally, users have reported confusion around how to leave inline comments.
Try to increase discoverability by showing the line reticle when you hover over the line.
(I could take this or leave it, but it seems OK / not annoying after 15 seconds of playing with it.)
Test Plan: Waved cursor over line numbers, attempted to test all the editor/noncontiguous/across-files cases.
Reviewers: btrahan, chad
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T2009
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D12010
Summary:
Ref T2009. Currently, the code which draws the reticle is sort of implicitly hard-coded with some of the rules for the 2up view.
Instead, use general rules:
- Start selection at the next `<td />`.
- End selection at the rightmost adjacent `<td />`.
These rules work in all cases.
Test Plan:
- Activated reticle in 1up and 2up views by clicking line numbers and hovering over comments. It now draws correctly.
- Dragged over line ranges in 1up and 2up views, saw accurate reticle.
Reviewers: btrahan, chad
Reviewed By: chad
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T2009
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D12009
Summary:
Ref T7014.
When no devices are connected, we don't meaningfully activate `JX.Scrollbar` (by design), but there was no fallback overflow CSS.
Also massage a couple of other CSS things to get sliiightly less broken behavior.
Test Plan:
- Disconnected USB devices; scrolled.
- Connected USB devices; scrolled.
Reviewers: btrahan, chad
Reviewed By: chad
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T7014
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D12008
Summary:
The "mlb" on the left nav creates a phantom bottom margin which gives the content measurable height but not scrollable height. Replace it with "plb" (padding) instead.
The 2px-spacer calculation was also not quite correct.
Test Plan:
- Viewed pages with navs; padding vs margin didn't seem to make any other differences.
- Scrollbar now stops in the right place in Safari, Chrome, Firefox.
Reviewers: btrahan, chad
Reviewed By: chad
Subscribers: epriestley
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D12007
Summary: Renames the method in PHUIObjectBoxView to match the new PHUIInfoView class.
Test Plan: grepped codebase. Went to Calendar and tried a new status.
Reviewers: btrahan, epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: Korvin, epriestley
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D12005
Summary: Removes AphrontPanelView, and most of it's CSS - it seems some old previews still call it.
Test Plan: grep for AphrontPanelView, no callsites left. Verify CSS left is minimal needed.
Reviewers: btrahan, epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: Korvin, epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T7427
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D12004
Summary: Ref T2009. Still a touch glitch-ish but essentially functional now.
Test Plan: Viewed image diffs in 1up and 2up views. Made inline comments on them.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T2009
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D12003
Summary: Ref T2009. Remove the 4 (!!) copies of this code.
Test Plan:
- Added, edited, and removed inline comments in 2up view.
- Stacked a bunch of comments on the same line and saw the JS place them correctly.
- Created an image diff and added, edited and removed inlines on it.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T2009
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D12000
Summary: Ref T2009. This can now be removed.
Test Plan: Added, edited and deleted an inline comment in 1up view.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T2009
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D11998
Summary:
Ref T2009. Inline comments have "scaffolding", which is basically some empty table cells/rows around them to get the layout correct.
The scaffolding depends on the renderer, since the cells are different for side-by-side vs unified diffs.
This is currently duplicated all over the place:
- Edit view has 1up/2up.
- Detail view has 1up/2up.
- 1up renderer has 1up.
- 2up renderer has four separate copies of the 2up logic.
These all have subtle differences, which are mostly bugs. Start making the scaffolding more composable so we can get rid of that mess.
Test Plan: Added, edited, and removed inline comments on unified and side-by-side diffs.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T2009
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D11997
Summary:
Ref T2009. These classes are "Differential" now, but are used elsewhere in diff infrastructure (e.g., Diffusion).
- Rename them to "PHUIDiff".
- Move them to "src/infrastructure/".
- Give them a base class.
Test Plan: Interacted with inlines in unified and side-by-side views.
Reviewers: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T2009
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D11996
Summary:
Ref T2009. This tweaks things a bit more to improve consecuitive groups of added and removed lines.
Generally, it gives us "old, old, old, new, new, new" intead of "old, new, old, new, old, new".
Feelin' real good about having unit tests for this stuff.
Test Plan: Unit tests, looked at diffs in web UI.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T2009
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D11994
Summary: Uses standard sidenav width, more spacing in labels, added background around textarea, make background work in Firefox.
Test Plan:
Test Desktop, Mobile, and Tablet break points. Test Firefox and Chrome.
{F331201}
Reviewers: btrahan, epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: Korvin, epriestley
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D11993
Summary: This improves some cases with interleaved added and removed lines, and adds test coverage.
Test Plan:
- Added and executed unit tests.
- Viewed raw diff and saw sensible/expected output.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D11992
Summary:
Ref T7014. This diff addresses
- getting it to be the right set of options
- add participant
- view in conpherence
- close window
- making those options work
- make it so if you are on /conpherence/ you can't toggle the durable column
Test Plan: inspected dom via chrome tools and found last transaction. added a participant and inspected the single new transactin added for accuracy. used view in conpherence action to view in conpherence. used close window action to close window
Reviewers: chad, epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: Korvin, epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T7014
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D11991
Summary:
Ref T2009. This reduces how buggy inlines are. They're still buggy.
Specifically, the inline endpoint didn't know how to scaffold inlines before, so some of them ended up rendering in the wrong rows or breaking layouts.
This passes the current renderer through to the inline editor endpoint, so it can at least get the layout correct.
Test Plan: Interacted with inlines in unified and side-by-side views.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T2009
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D11988
Summary:
These aren't being populated yet; they mostly fix some JS errors with inlines.
For example, the inline hover reticle relies on adjusting its width to account for the "copy" column, and failed when the column did not exist.
Test Plan:
- Hovering inlines in unified now works, mostly.
- Interacted with inlines in side-by-side.
Reviewers: chad, btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D11985
Summary: Ref T2009. Unchanged lines should always go above inlines; we get nonsense results otherwise.
Test Plan: Inline now shows in correct place in unified view.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T2009
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D11987
Summary:
Ref T2009. Currently, lines don't get their "C123NL456" IDs set in the unified view. This is the major way that inlines are glued to changesets.
Simplify this rendering and bring it into the HTML renderer, then use it in the OneUp renderer.
Test Plan:
- Interacted with side-by-side inlines (hovered, added, edited, deleted), saw unchanged behavior.
- Interacted with unified inlines. They still don't work, but the error that breaks them is deeper in the stack.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T2009
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D11983
Summary: Ref T2009. I've clicked these links like 200 times in testing now, so I'm feeling pretty good about them.
Test Plan: Viewed links in side-by-side diff, clicked them.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T2009
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D11981
Summary: Ref T2009. It doesn't make sense to have these as separate behaviors. We require a ChangesetViewManager to track view parameter state.
Test Plan: Interacted with changesets in Phriction, Differential and Diffusion.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T2009
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D11979
Summary:
Ref T2009. Currently, we do not persist view parameters when making context rendering requests.
The big one is the renderer (1up vs 2up). This makes context on unified diffs come in with too many columns.
However, it impacts other parameters too. For example, at HEAD, if you change highlighting to "rainbow" and then load more context, the context uses the original highlighter instead of the rainbow highlighter.
This moves context loads into ChangesetViewManager, which maintains view parameters and can provide them correctly.
- This removes "ref"; it is no longer required, as the ChangesetViewManager tracks it.
- This removes URI management from `behavior-show-more`; it is no longer required, since the ChangesetViewManager knows how to render.
- This removes "whitespace" since this is handled properly by the view manager.
Test Plan:
- Used "Show Top" / "Show All" / "Show Bottom" in 1-up and 2-up views.
- Changed file highlighting to rainbow, loaded stuff, saw rainbow stick.
- Used "Show Entire File" in 1-up and 2-up views.
- Saw loading chrome.
- No loading chrome normally.
- Made inlines, verified `copyRows()` code runs.
- Poked around Diffusion -- it is missing some parameter handling, but works OK.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T2009
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D11977
Summary:
Ref T2009. This clears the stage for D11977.
Specifically, D11977 moves "show context" logic into ChangesetViewManager, but those objects won't exist if we don't run "behavior-populate" first.
Generally, this increases consistency across changeset views -- which is still very low overall, but getting slightly better.
Both of these should probably move up more and use ChangesetListView, but we don't need to do that quite yet.
Test Plan:
- Took changeset actions in Phriction diff view.
- Took changeset actions in Differential standalone view.
- Took changeset actions in normal Differential view.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T2009
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D11978
Summary:
Ref T2009. This basically copy/pastes them for now. Plans is:
- Make this actually work all the way.
- Add test coverage after D11970.
- Move 2-up here after test coverage.
Clicking the links does not work yet, because they use the 2-up renderer. I'll fix this in the next diff.
Test Plan: Viewed diffs in unified, saw links to show more.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: chad, epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T2009
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D11976
Summary: Ref T2009. This doesn't work when it's not on <body>, at least in modern iOS.
Test Plan:
Before:
{F330031}
After:
{F330033}
Reviewers: btrahan, chad
Reviewed By: chad
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T2009
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D11975
Summary: Ref T2009. Remove forced min-width of 780px in 1-up mode, and tweak a few other things to look better.
Test Plan: Looks better on mobile.
Reviewers: btrahan, chad
Reviewed By: chad
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T2009
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D11974
Summary: Ref T2009. These aren't good enough to actually use so I won't land this yet, but it makes testing changes a lot easier.
Test Plan:
- Swapped setting.
- Loaded revisions.
- Saw setting respected.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T2009
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D11972
Summary:
See D11468 and D11465. Fixes T5163. Fixes T4105. This makes it practical to test shields, unshielding, moves, etc.
This fixes the issue in D11468, where line maps from whitespace-ignored hunks could have fewer lines than line maps from whitespace-respected hunks, causing a warning.
This encodes the behavior which D11465 changed, making it the canon behavior. Specifically, we do **not** show a shield. I think this is correct. It seems misleading to show "the contents of this file were not changed", because they were changed in both the sense that the file was completely removed, and also changed in the sense that the content itself was (or may have been) changed at the destination. Instead, we just show nothing.
Test Plan:
- Added test coverage.
- Ran tests.
- Used `arc diff --raw --browse` to verify that web behavior was consistent with CLI/test behavior.
Reviewers: joshuaspence, btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T4105, T5163
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D11970
Summary: This ended up having a different signature; the discrepancy can cause a warning.
Test Plan: No more warning.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D11971
Summary:
Ref T7014. This hooks up the durable column such that when you open it up it loads your most recent Conpherence. You can then switch amongst the various widgets and stuff and everything works nicely.
Except...
- scroll bar does not work
- also doesn't work at HEAD when I add a ton of text to the UI with no changes? (wrapped $copy in array_fill(0, 1000, $copy))
- "widget selector" does not collapse when you select something else
- this part wasn't really specified so I used the aphlict dropdown stuff. didn't want to keep working on that if this was the wrong UI choice
- can not edit title
- do we still want that to be done by clicking on the title, which pops a dialogue?
- can not add participants or calendar events
- what should this UI be? maybe just a button on the top for "participants" and a button on the bottom for calendar? both on top?
- this is not pixel perfect to the mock or two I've seen around. Aside from generally being bad at that, I definitely didn't get the name + timestamps formatting correctly, because the standard DOM of that has timestamp FIRST which appears second due to a "float right". Seemed like a lot of special-casing for what might not even be that important in the UI so I punted. (And again, there's likely many unknown ways in which this isn't pixel perfect)
There's also code quality issues
- `ConpherenceWidgetConfigConstants` is hopefully temporary or at least gets more sleek as we keep progressing here
- copied some CSS from main Conpherence app
- DOM structure is pretty different
- there's some minor CSS tweaks too given the different width (not to mention the DOM structure being different)
- copied some JS from behavior-pontificate.js to sync threads relative to aphlict updates
- JS in general is like a better version of existing JS; these should collapse I'd hope?
- maybe the aphlict-behavior-dropdown change was badsauce?
...but all that said, this definitely feels really nice and I feel like adding stuff is going to be really easy compared to how normal Conpherence is.
Also includes a bonus bug fix - we now correctly update participation. The user would encounter this issue if they were in a conpherence that got some updates and then they went to a different page; they would have unread status for the messages that were ajax'd in. This patch fixes that by making sure we mark participation up to date with the proper transaction in all cases.
Test Plan: hit "\" to invoke the column and saw nice loading UI and my latest conpherence load. sent messages and verified they received A-OK by looking in DOM console. toggled various widges and verified they rendered correctly. opened up a second browser with a second user on the thread, sent a message, and it was received in a nice asynchronous fashion
Reviewers: chad, epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: Korvin, epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T7014
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D11968
Summary: Switch to modern components, crumbs, pht, object boxes.
Test Plan:
Test browsing a list, click edit, click new repository, click delete, verify all work as expected.
{F330864}
Reviewers: btrahan, epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: Korvin, epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T7427
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D11984
Summary: Makes this just a plain box (we don't have UI for table-in-form just yet).
Test Plan: Faked some connection data to view the display.
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: Korvin, epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T7427
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D11982
Summary: Pass this as true when building XHProf pages
Test Plan: Verify setDeviceReady exists in class PhabricatorBarePageView
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: Korvin, epriestley
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D11980
Summary: The participant list can sometimes be `null`, which fails when we try to `array_fuse()` it.
Test Plan: Created a new thread cleanly.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D11969
Summary:
Ref T6516. Although this behavior is somewhat-arguable as desirable, I think it's less surprising and more consistent to disable mentions when a repository is publishing.
In particular, if you import a repository developed on another Phabricator install, this stops all the `T123` in commit messages from creating mentions on your unrelated `T123` tasks.
We already disable autoclose, so `Closes T123` and `Ref T123` already have no effect, but a bare `T123` would generate a mention. Likewise, `@epriestley` would generate a mention.
If you import such a repository and then update it periodically, updates will activate autoclose and publishing (if you didn't disable them), but presumably this will hit a couple of tasks and you'll go change the settings if you forgot.
At some point, we may have some kind of use case for separating the "publish" setting into a "publish" setting and a "this is a local repository" setting. For example, if you work at Widget Corp, want to import Phabricator locally, //and// want to write Herald rules against it, you can't currently configure the repository to let you do all of this. But we haven't actually seen a use case for this yet.
Test Plan:
- Pushed some commits with bare `T11`, saw mentions.
- Disabled publishing for the repository, pushed some commits with
- Imported a bunch of commits without seeing pipeline failures.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T6516
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D11966
Summary: Ref T4214. Reduce the need for installs to purge caches.
Test Plan:
{F329350}
- Changed header twice.
- New one showed up without dirtying cache.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T4214
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D11965
Summary: Ref T6516. We incorrectly fail to set this flag on repositories created via Conduit, which activates too many actions on old commits.
Test Plan:
- Created a new repository via Conduit, verified it was "importing" after creation.
- Created a new repostiory via web UI, verified it was "importing" after creation.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T6516
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D11964
Summary: Fixes T7454. We weren't triggering "Show Older" unless there were hidden events because of a previous interaction.
Test Plan:
- Set page size to 3.
- Viewed a task with ~10 transactions.
- Before patch:
- Only 3 most recent transactions visible, no way to see older ones.
- Saw "show older" appear, paged backward through transaction histroy.
- Also, interacted with task and then viewed it, made sure "show older" still works.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T7454
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D11963
Summary: Update fund for new merchant authority stuff.
Test Plan:
- Created a secret initiative.
- Could see related activity as merchant.
- Could not see it not-as-merchant.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D11959
Summary: Fixes T7392. I kind of stink at SQL so my approach here was to "start over" conceptually and this way makes the most sense to me - we basically do one join on the dependency table and then a second join back from the dependency table to the main task table. In the where clause we filter the resulting rows, first checking the data from dependency join for existence as appropros and then checking the second join for main task table for the proper "open" task values.
Test Plan: made a task X be blocked by task Y. closed task y. search for "not blocked" tasks and saw task X.
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: Korvin, epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T7392
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D11962
