1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://we.phorge.it/source/phorge.git synced 2024-11-25 16:22:43 +01:00
Commit graph

15665 commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
epriestley
d2316e8025 Fix an errant "switch ... continue"
Summary:
See <https://discourse.phabricator-community.org/t/unhandled-exception-on-create-task/2062>.

This construction has the same behavior as "switch ... break" but is unconventional. PHP 7.3 started warning about it because it's likely a mistake.

Test Plan: Created a task, edited a task owner. The new code is functionally identical to the old code.

Reviewers: amckinley

Reviewed By: amckinley

Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D19772
2018-11-05 10:26:27 -08:00
epriestley
24a061f844 Correct an ambiguous regexp in DiffusionRequest
Summary:
See <https://discourse.phabricator-community.org/t/diffusionrequest-regex-error/2057/>.

The intent of `[\d-,]` is "digits, hyphen, and comma" but `[x-y]` means "character range x-y".

Specify `[\d,-]` instead to disambiguate the hyphen as "literal hyphen", not a character range marker.

Test Plan: I can't reproduce the original error as reported, but browsed around Diffusion for a bit.

Reviewers: amckinley, avivey

Reviewed By: avivey

Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D19770
2018-11-01 20:01:39 -07:00
Tim Hirsh
9bea00c159 Add harbormaster.buildplan.search api method
Summary: This revision adds a conduit search method for build plans.  Other api methods (eg: `harbormaster.build.search`) support build plan phid's as a constraint, but they weren't exposed anywhere, so this provides a way to fetch them.

Test Plan:
Used the api console to run some searches.  Output:
```
{
  "data": [
    {
      "id": 1,
      "type": "HMCP",
      "phid": "PHID-HMCP-q2c25wvegzdkxs7gzor6",
      "fields": {
        "name": "my build plan",
        "planStatus": "active",
        "dateCreated": 1538085249,
        "dateModified": 1538085249,
        "policy": {
          "view": "users",
          "edit": "admin"
        }
      },
    {
      "id": 1,
      "type": "HMCP",
      "phid": "PHID-HMCP-q2c25wvegzdkxs7gzor6",
      "fields": {
        "name": "my build plan",
        "status": {
          "value": "active"
        },
        "dateCreated": 1538085249,
        "dateModified": 1538085249,
        "policy": {
          "view": "users",
          "edit": "admin"
        }
      },
      "attachments": {}
    },
    ...
  ],
  "maps": {},
  "query": {
    "queryKey": null
  },
  "cursor": {
    "limit": 100,
    "after": null,
    "before": null,
    "order": null
  }
}
```

Reviewers: epriestley, #blessed_reviewers

Reviewed By: epriestley, #blessed_reviewers

Subscribers: Korvin, yelirekim

Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D19769
2018-11-02 02:57:38 +00:00
epriestley
5d4970d6b2 Fix a bug where "View as Query" could replace a saved query row by ID, causing workboard 404s
Summary:
Fixes T13208. See that task for details.

The `clone $query` line is safe if `$query` is a builtin query (like "open").

However, if it's a saved query we clone not only the query parameters but the ID, too. Then when we `save()` the query later, we overwrite the original query.

So this would happen in the database. First, you run a query and save it as the workboard default (query key "abc123"):

| 123 | abc123 | {"...xxx..."} |

Then we `clone` it and change the parameters, and `save()` it. But that causes an `UPDATE ... WHERE id = 123` and the table now looks like this:

| 123 | def456 | {"...yyy..."} |

What we want is to create a new query instead, with an `INSERT ...`:

| 123 | abc123 | {"...xxx..."} |
| 124 | def456 | {"...yyy..."} |

Test Plan:
  - Followed reproduction steps from above.
    - With just the new `save()` guard, hit the guard error.
    - With the `newCopy()`, got a new copy of the query and "View as Query" remained functional without overwriting the original query row.
  - Ran migration, saw an affected board get fixed.

Reviewers: amckinley, joshuaspence

Reviewed By: joshuaspence

Subscribers: PHID-OPKG-gm6ozazyms6q6i22gyam

Maniphest Tasks: T13208

Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D19768
2018-11-01 05:44:49 -07:00
epriestley
b950f877c5 Allow Drydock Blueprints to control "supplemental allocation" behavior so all hosts in an Almanac pool get used
Summary:
Fixes T12145. Ref T13210. See PHI570. See PHI536.

Currently, when you give Drydock an Almanac host pool with more than one host, it never voluntarily builds a second host resource: there is no way to say "maximum X working copies per host" (only "maximum X global working copies") to make the first host overflow, and the allocator tries to pack resources as tightly as possible.

If you can force it to allocate the 2nd..Nth host, things will work reasonably well from there (it will spread working copies across the hosts randomly), but tricking it is very hard, especially before D19761.

To deal with this, give blueprints a new behavior around "supplemental allocations". The idea here is that a blueprint may decide that it would prefer to allocate a fresh new resource instead of allowing an otherwise valid acquisition to occur.

These supplemental allocations follow all the normal allocation rules (they can't exceed limits or actually replace existing resources), so they can only happen if there's free space in the resource pool. But a blueprint can elect for a supplemental allocation to provide a "grow the pool" hint.

The only useful policies here are probably "true" (immediately use all resources, like Almanac) or "false" (pack resources as efficiently as possible) but some other policies //might// be useful (perhaps "start growing the pool when we're getting a bit full even if we aren't at the limit yet, since our workload is bursty").

Then, give Almanac host resources a "true" policy (always allocate supplemental resources) so they use all hosts once a similar number of concurrent jobs arrive.

One aspect of this approach is that we only do supplemental resources if the normal allocation algorithm already decided that the best resource to acquire was part of the same blueprint. I started with an approach like "look at all the blueprints and see if any of them want to be greedy", but then a not-very-desirable blueprint would end up filling up its whole pool before we skipped the supplemental allocation part and ended up picking a different resource. That felt a bit silly and this feels a little cleaner and more focused.

Test Plan:
  - Without changing the Almanac blueprint policy, allocated hosts. Got A, A, A, A, ... (second host never used).
  - Changed the Almanac policy.
  - Allocated hosts, got A, B, random mix of A and B.
  - Destroyed B. Destroyed all leases on A. Allocated. Got A. This tests the "don't build a supplemental resource if there are no leases on the natural resource".

Reviewers: amckinley

Reviewed By: amckinley

Subscribers: yelirekim, PHID-OPKG-gm6ozazyms6q6i22gyam

Maniphest Tasks: T13210, T12145

Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D19762
2018-10-31 18:06:47 -07:00
epriestley
57b4b59819 When a Drydock host based on an Almanac blueprint has its binding disabled, stop handing out leases
Summary:
Ref T13210. Ref T12145. The "Almanac Host" blueprint currently hands out new leases on a given host even if the binding has been disabled.

Although there are some more complicated cases here (e.g., involving cleanup of the existing resource and existing leases), this one seems clear cut: if the binding has been disabled, we should stop handing out new leases on it.

Test Plan:
  - Created a service with two hosts.
  - Requested a lease, got host A.
  - Requested more leases, always got host A (we never build a new host when we don't have to, and we currently never have to).
  - Disabled the binding to host A.
  - Requested a lease.
    - Before patch: got host A.
    - After patch: got host B.
  - Also disabled the other binding to host B, requested a lease, got an indefinite wait for resources (which is expected and reasonable).

Reviewers: amckinley

Reviewed By: amckinley

Subscribers: yelirekim, PHID-OPKG-gm6ozazyms6q6i22gyam

Maniphest Tasks: T13210, T12145

Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D19761
2018-10-27 07:20:30 -07:00
epriestley
65e953658a Expose Audit actions for "transaction.search" in a basic way
Summary: Ref T13210. See PHI841. This mirrors D19509 for Differential.

Test Plan: Called `transaction.search` on a commit with a bunch of audit activity, got appropriate labels in the results.

Reviewers: amckinley

Reviewed By: amckinley

Maniphest Tasks: T13210

Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D19760
2018-10-27 07:19:50 -07:00
epriestley
61ec434208 Remove unicode marks for "Accept/Raise Concern" in Audit
Summary:
Ref T13210. The comment action dropdown for audits has a heavy checkmark next to "Accept" and a heavy "X" next to "Raise Concern".

We previously removed similar marks in Differential in D19405 and that seems to have gone fine. For consistency, remove these too.

Test Plan: Viewed the comment action dropdown, no longer saw checkmark and X-mark.

Reviewers: amckinley

Reviewed By: amckinley

Maniphest Tasks: T13210

Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D19759
2018-10-27 07:19:18 -07:00
epriestley
a7c008708d Correct a mangled translation string in "bin/phd log --id X"
Summary:
Ref T13210. See PHI930. This translation is wrong: the parameter is a comma-separated list as a string, but the USEnglish translation provides alternatives. We can't select among alternatives based on a random string (it isn't a plurality value to let us select "chair" vs "chairs", and isn't a gender value to let us select "his profile" vs "her profile") so we get an error.

But the string itself is also misleading, since "bin/phd log --id A --id B --id C" will say "none of these are valid" if //any// of them are invalid.

Instead, just tell the user explicitly about the first problem.

Test Plan:
  - Ran `bin/phd log --id` with good (got logs) and bad IDs (got sensible error).
  - Ran `bin/phd log` with any logs (got logs) and (simluated) without any logs (got error).

Reviewers: amckinley

Reviewed By: amckinley

Maniphest Tasks: T13210

Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D19755
2018-10-26 06:13:18 -07:00
Mike Riley
5f3a7cb41b Expose Drydock leases via Conduit
Summary:
See T13212 for some context and discussion on this being revived.
See T11694 for original context.

Add a query constraint for lease owners and implement the conduit search method for Drydock leases.

Ref T11694. Fixes T13212.

Test Plan:
- Called the API method from conduit and browsed lease queries from the UI.
- Used the new "ownerPHIDs" constraint via API console.

{F5963044}

Reviewers: yelirekim, amckinley

Reviewed By: amckinley

Subscribers: PHID-OPKG-gm6ozazyms6q6i22gyam, epriestley

Maniphest Tasks: T11694, T13212

Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D16594
2018-10-26 06:12:38 -07:00
epriestley
f6122547d7 When a lease triggers a resource allocation for a resource which must activate, awaken the lease task after the resource activates
Summary:
Depends on D19753. Ref T13210. This is a small optimization that saves us from waiting up to 15 seconds for a yield.

When there are no Working Copy resources and a new lease comes in, we'll allocate one and yield until it activates.

If activating it (SSH'ing and running `git clone`) takes less than 15 seconds, the resource will activate (say, at T+4) but the lease won't update again for a while (say, until T+15). This leaves us with a pointless wait (in this example, we're sitting around for 9 seconds when we could move forward).

To improve this a little bit, let resources wake up the lease update tasks that triggered allocation after they activate. In the best case, that task runs ~15 seconds sooner. In the worst case, the awaken is just a no-op.

With a more-full queue, this has a smaller effect (it's likely something else will run and be able to use the resource in those 9 seconds).

With already-activated resources, this has no effect (when resources are already activated, we can lease immediately).

Test Plan:
  - Cleaned up all working copy resources.
  - Requested a new "A" working copy.
  - Before patch: got a working copy after 17-18 seconds, most of which was spent yielded.
  - After patch: got a working copy after 3-4 seconds.

Reviewers: amckinley

Reviewed By: amckinley

Subscribers: PHID-OPKG-gm6ozazyms6q6i22gyam

Maniphest Tasks: T13210

Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D19754
2018-10-26 06:11:43 -07:00
epriestley
78ab675bd8 After a Drydock lease triggers a resource to be reclaimed, stop it from triggering another reclaim until the first one completes
Summary:
Depends on D19752. Ref T13210. If resources take a long time to reclaim/destroy (normally, more than 15 seconds) a single new lease may update several times during the reclaim/destroy process and end up reclaiming multiple resources.

Instead: after a lease triggers a reclaim, prevent it from triggering another reclaim as long as the resource it is reclaiming hasn't finished its reclaim/destroy cycle. Basically, each lease only gets to destroy one resource at a time.

Test Plan:
  - Added a `sleep(120)` to `destroyResource()` to simulate a long reclaim/destroy cycle.
  - Allocated A, A, A working copies. Leased a B working copy.
  - Before patch: saw "B" lease destroy all three "A" working copies after ~0, ~15, and ~30 seconds, then build a new "B" resource after ~120 seconds (when the first reclaim/destroy finished).
  - After patch: saw "B" lease destroy one "A" working copy after ~0 seconds, then wait patiently until it finished up, then build a new "B" resource.

Reviewers: amckinley

Reviewed By: amckinley

Subscribers: PHID-OPKG-gm6ozazyms6q6i22gyam

Maniphest Tasks: T13210

Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D19753
2018-10-26 06:11:05 -07:00
epriestley
e9309fdd6a When a Drydock lease schedules a resource to be reclaimed, awaken the lease update task when the reclaim completes
Summary:
Depends on D19751. Ref T13210. When Drydock needs to reclaim an existing unused resource in order to build a new resource to satisfy a lease, the lease which triggered the reclaim currently gets thrown back into the pool with a 15-second yield.

If the queue is pretty empty and the reclaim is quick, this can mean that we spend up to 15 extra seconds just waiting for the lease update task to get another shot at building a resource (the resource reclaim may complete in a second or two, but nothing else happens until the yield ends).

Instead, when a lease triggers a reclaim, have the reclaim reawaken the lease task when it completes. In the best case, this saves us 15 seconds of waiting. In other cases (the task already completed some other way, the resource gets claimed before the lease gets to it), it's harmless.

Test Plan:
  - Allocated A, A, A working copies with limit 3. Leased a B working copy.
  - Before patch: allocation took ~32 seconds.
  - After patch: allocation takes ~17 seconds (i.e., about 15 seconds less).

Reviewers: amckinley

Reviewed By: amckinley

Subscribers: PHID-OPKG-gm6ozazyms6q6i22gyam

Maniphest Tasks: T13210

Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D19752
2018-10-26 06:09:52 -07:00
epriestley
1f6869a765 In "bin/drydock lease", take a JSON "--attributes" so we can accept complex values
Summary:
Depends on D19750. See T13210. The `bin/drydock lease` command makes it easier to request ad-hoc leases, but currently takes lease attributes in the form `--attributes x=y,a=b`.

This was okay for all leases at the time, but doesn't really work for modern WorkingCopy resources since they take a `repositories.map` which has a dictionary as a value. You can't specify that with `repositories.map=...`.

Instead, point `--attributes` at a JSON file or use `--attributes -` to read from stdin.

Test Plan: Used `--attributes` with a file and stdin to allocate working copy leases with repositories.

Reviewers: amckinley

Reviewed By: amckinley

Subscribers: PHID-OPKG-gm6ozazyms6q6i22gyam

Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D19751
2018-10-26 06:09:20 -07:00
epriestley
6deb09efcd When leasing a Working Copy in Drydock, just "git reset --hard" so empty repositories work
Summary:
Ref T13210. We currently "git reset --hard HEAD" during working copy leasing, mostly by convention/familiarity.

However, this command does not work in an empty repository, because there is no HEAD yet.

The command "git reset --hard" appears to have the same meaning and effect in all cases, except that it also works correctly in an empty repository.

The manual suggests that omitting HEAD should be the same as specifying HEAD, too:

> The <tree-ish>/<commit> defaults to HEAD in all forms.

Test Plan: Successfully leased a working copy for an empty repository using Drydock.

Reviewers: amckinley

Reviewed By: amckinley

Subscribers: yelirekim, PHID-OPKG-gm6ozazyms6q6i22gyam

Maniphest Tasks: T13210

Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D19750
2018-10-26 06:08:47 -07:00
epriestley
e2cf1e4288 Skip copied code detection for changes that are too large for it to be useful
Summary:
Ref T13210. See PHI944. When parsing certain large diffs (the case in PHI944 is an 2.5-million line JSON diff), we spend ~66% of runtime and ~80% of memory doing copy detection (the little yellow bar which shows up to give you a hint that code was moved around within a diff).

This is pretty much pointless and copy hints are almost certainly never useful on large changes. Instead, just bail if the change is larger than some arbitrary "probably too big for copy hints to ever be useful" threshold (here, 65535 lines).

Test Plan:
Roughly, ran this against a 2.5 million line JSON diff:

```
$changes = id(new ArcanistDiffParser())->parseDiff($raw_diff);
$diff = DifferentialDiff::newFromRawChanges($viewer, $changes);
```

Before the changes, it took 20s + 2.5GB RAM to parse. After the changes, it took 7s + 500MB RAM to parse.

Reviewers: amckinley

Reviewed By: amckinley

Maniphest Tasks: T13210

Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D19748
2018-10-20 03:36:34 -07:00
epriestley
e0dea4c486 Fix packages(project) to work properly and add it to "MailableFunctionDatasource"
Summary:
Ref T13210. See PHI937. This function datasource isn't quite implemented correctly: it doesn't resolve `package(project)` properly, since the logic only handles users.

This blames back to D14013, where it looks like `packages(..)` was added mostly as a general nice-to-have as part of a larger modernization change.

Test Plan: Ran a `packages(project)` query in Differential, got accurate results (previously: no results).

Reviewers: amckinley

Reviewed By: amckinley

Maniphest Tasks: T13210

Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D19747
2018-10-19 13:53:27 -07:00
epriestley
bc6c8c0e93 Explicitly shuffle nodes before selecting one for cluster sync
Summary:
Depends on D19734. Ref T13202. Ref T13109. Ref T10884. See PHI905. See PHI889. We currently rank cluster nodes in three cases:

  # when performing a write, we can go to any node (D19734 should make our ranking good);
  # when performing a read, we can go to any node (currently random, but T10884 discusses ideas to improve our ranking);
  # when performing an internal synchronization before a read or a write, we must go to an up-to-date node.

Currently, case (3) is not-exactly-deterministic but not random, and we won't spread intracluster traffic acrosss the cluster evenly if, say, half of it is up to date and half of it is still synchronizing. For a given write, I believe all nodes will tend to synchronize from whichever node first received the write today.

Instead, shuffle the list and synchronize from any up-to-date node.

(I think we could improve upon this only by knowing which nodes actually have load and selecting the least-loaded -- doable, but not trivial.)

Test Plan: Poked at it locally, will deploy to `secure`. This is hard to measure/test terribly convincingly.

Reviewers: amckinley

Reviewed By: amckinley

Maniphest Tasks: T13202, T13109, T10884

Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D19735
2018-10-17 08:11:23 -07:00
epriestley
51073b972e Try to route cluster writes to nodes which won't need to synchronize first
Summary:
Ref T13109. Ref T13202. See PHI905. See PHI889. When we receive a write to a repository cluster, we currently send it to a random writable node.

Instead, we can prefer:

  - the node currently holding the write lock; or
  - any node which is already up to date.

These should simply be better nodes to take writes in all cases. The write lock is global for the repository, so there's no scaling benefit to spreading writes across different nodes, and these particular nodes will be able to accept the write more quickly.

Test Plan:
  - This is observable by using `fprintf(STDERR, "%s\n", ...)` in the logic, then running `git push`. I'd like to pull this routing logic out of `PhabricatorRepository` at some point, probably into a dedicated `ClusterURIQuery` sort of class, but that is a larger change.
  - Added some `fprintf(...)` stuff around which nodes were being selected.
  - Added a `sleep(10)` after grabbing the write lock.
  - In one window, pushed. Then pushed in a second window.
    - Saw the second window select the lock holder as the write target based on it currently holding the lock.
    - Without a concurrent push, saw pushes select up-to-date nodes based on their up-to-date-ness.

Reviewers: amckinley

Reviewed By: amckinley

Subscribers: joshuaspence, timhirsh

Maniphest Tasks: T13202, T13109

Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D19734
2018-10-17 08:08:25 -07:00
epriestley
0a51bc4f05 Add a space after "View Inline" in mail to prevent double-click on the filename from selecting "Inline"
Summary:
See PHI920. Ref T13210. Since the HTML is just:

```
<a>View Inline</a><span>filename.txt</span>
```

..double-clicking "filename.txt" in email selects "Inlinefilename.txt".

Add a space to stop this. At least in Safari, a space between the tags is not sufficient (perhaps because the parent is a `<div>`?). I couldn't find an authoritative-seeming source on what the rules for this actually are and adding a space here fixes the issue without changing the visual rendering, so just put it here.

Test Plan:
  - Made an inline.
  - Used `bin/mail show-outbound --id ... --dump-html` to dump the HTML.
  - Double-clicked the filename.

{F5929186}

Reviewers: amckinley

Reviewed By: amckinley

Maniphest Tasks: T13210

Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D19742
2018-10-11 13:44:20 -07:00
epriestley
8bffc9ea0e In "bin/bulk export", require "--output <path>" by default
Summary:
Depends on D19743. Ref T13210. Since this command can easily dump a bunch of binary data (or just a huge long blob of nonsense) to stdout, default to requiring "--output <file>".

Using `--output -` will print to stdout.

Test Plan: Ran with: no `--output`, `--output file`, `--output -`, `--output - --overwrite`. Got sensible results or errors in all cases.

Reviewers: amckinley

Reviewed By: amckinley

Maniphest Tasks: T13210

Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D19744
2018-10-11 13:35:16 -07:00
epriestley
4f54d483d5 Support export of revisions to Excel/CSV/JSON/etc
Summary: Ref T13210. See PHI806. This enables basic export of revisions into flat data formats. This isn't too fancy, but just covers the basics since the driving use case isn't especially concerned about getting all the fields and details.

Test Plan: Exported some revisions into JSON, got sensible output.

Reviewers: amckinley

Reviewed By: amckinley

Maniphest Tasks: T13210

Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D19743
2018-10-11 13:34:33 -07:00
epriestley
4f557ff075 When using "bin/bulk export --overwrite", actually overwrite the file
Summary: Depends on D19738. Ref T13210. Currently, when you use "--overwrite", we just //append// the new content. Instead, actually overwrite the file.

Test Plan: Used `--overwrite`, saw an actual clean overwrite instead of an append.

Reviewers: amckinley

Reviewed By: amckinley

Maniphest Tasks: T13210

Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D19739
2018-10-11 08:13:43 -07:00
epriestley
4928c34d00 Allow "bin/bulk export" to merge multiple queries and accept more flexible flags
Summary:
Ref T13210. Minor usability improvements to "bin/bulk export":

  - Allow `--class task` to work (previously, only `--class ManiphestTaskSearchEngine` worked).
  - If you run `--query jXIlzQyOYHPU`, don't require `--class`, since the query identifies the class on its own.
  - Allow users to call `--query A --query B --query C` and get a union of all results.

Test Plan:
  - Ran `--class task`, `--query A --query B`, `--query X` (with no `--class`), got good results.
  - Ran various flavors of bad combinations (queries from different engines, invalid engines, query and class differing, ambiguous/invalid `--class` name) and got sensible errors.

Reviewers: amckinley

Reviewed By: amckinley

Maniphest Tasks: T13210

Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D19738
2018-10-10 09:14:14 -07:00
epriestley
99034efa8b Make Pholio mail render without a ton of over-escaped HTML
Summary:
Ref T13202. See PHI900. Fixes T12814. Pholio currently builds HTML comments in an older way that can dump a bunch of over-escaped HTML into mail bodies.

Update the logic to be more similar to the Differential rendering logic and stop over-escaping things.

The result isn't perfect, but is dramatically less broken.

Test Plan: {F5919860}

Reviewers: amckinley

Reviewed By: amckinley

Maniphest Tasks: T13202, T12814

Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D19733
2018-10-05 13:37:26 -07:00
epriestley
c6c1893dc0 Allow revisions to be filtered by created date
Summary:
Ref T13202. See PHI906. This is a reasonable capability which we support in some other applications already.

(The only real reason not to support this is that it creates some clutter in the UI, but I think we're generally in better shape now than we were in the past, and we could make this UI collapse/fold at some point.)

Test Plan: Ran queries with a minimum date, a maximum date, both, and neither. Saw appropriate results in all cases.

Reviewers: amckinley

Reviewed By: amckinley

Maniphest Tasks: T13202

Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D19732
2018-10-05 12:28:20 -07:00
epriestley
cfd9fa7f55 Add an explicit "max-width" to PHUIDocumentPro pages to force large tables to scroll
Summary:
Ref T13202. See <https://discourse.phabricator-community.org/t/phriction-page-controls-lost-after-creating-very-wide-table/1961>.

If you put a very wide table in the markup for a new-layout Phriction page, it can push the actions element off screen to the right.

Tables already get a scrollbar if encouraged strongly enough; add a `max-width` to encourage them.

Test Plan:
  - Viewed pages with a large wrappable and non-wrappable content on mobile, tablet, and desktop.

{F5915976}

Reviewers: amckinley

Reviewed By: amckinley

Maniphest Tasks: T13202

Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D19723
2018-10-01 13:15:59 -07:00
epriestley
4858d43d16 Add 'autocomplete="off"' to MFA TOTP inputs
Summary:
Ref T13202. See <https://discourse.phabricator-community.org/t/2fa-input-box-isnt-hinted-as-a-password-so-browsers-suggest-auto-fills/1959>.

If browsers are autofilling this, I think browser behavior here is bad, but behavior is probably better on the balance if we hint this as `autocomplete="off"` and this is a minor concesssion.

Test Plan:
  - I couldn't immediately get any browser to try to autofill this field (perhaps I've disabled autofill, or just not enabled it aggressively?), but this change didn't break anything.
  - After the change, answered a TOTP prompt normally.
  - After the change, inspected page content and saw `autocomplete="off"` on the `<input />` node.

Reviewers: amckinley

Reviewed By: amckinley

Maniphest Tasks: T13202

Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D19722
2018-10-01 13:08:54 -07:00
epriestley
39b85c0be0 Use the changeset parse cache when rendering inline comments in mail
Summary:
Ref T13202. See PHI903 and PHI894. When a bot leaves 100 inline comments on the same file and the revision has a 30-member recipient list, we currently highlight the file 3000 times when building mail.

Instead, engage the parse cache so we highlight it once and reuse the cache 2,999 times.

Test Plan:
  - Added debugging code to stop after mail generation and show cache hits/misses.
    - Left a bunch of inlines in a file.
    - Ran the worker with `bin/worker execute --id ...`.
    - Before change: saw 4 comments x 2 recipients = 8 cache misses
    - After change: saw 8 cache hits (cache already filled from web UI rendering)
  - Removed debugging code, ran worker to completion.
  - Used `bin/mail show-outbound --id ... --dump-html` to inspect resulting mail, saw no functional differences.

Reviewers: amckinley

Reviewed By: amckinley

Maniphest Tasks: T13202

Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D19721
2018-10-01 13:08:27 -07:00
Austin McKinley
dbf2302b6c Fix self-cancelling typo
Summary: Ref D18268. This typo cancelled itself out, and I can't find any other callers.

Test Plan: arc unit

Reviewers: epriestley

Reviewed By: epriestley

Subscribers: Korvin

Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D19718
2018-09-28 17:44:33 -07:00
Austin McKinley
8065433ee8 Migrate DiffusionBlameController to use repo identities
Summary:
Now on the blame page, identities get `avatar.png` and there are little tooltips that show a few characters of the committer identity string.

Also add a default icon for repo identities.

Test Plan: Loaded some blame pages for files touched by users with and without repo identities attached.

Reviewers: epriestley

Reviewed By: epriestley

Subscribers: Korvin

Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D19587
2018-09-26 14:45:58 -07:00
epriestley
021c612cb2 When we fail to acquire a repository lock, try to provide a hint about why
Summary:
Ref T13202. See PHI889. If the lock log is enabled, we can try to offer more details about lock holders.

When we fail to acquire a lock:

  - check for recent acquisitions and suggest that this is a bottleneck issue;
  - if there are no recent acquisitions, check for the last acquisition and print details about it (what process, how long ago, whether or not we believe it was released).

Test Plan:
  - Enabled the lock log.
  - Changed the lock wait time to 1 second.
  - Added a `sleep(10)` after grabbing the lock.
  - In one window, ran a Conduit call or a `git fetch`.
  - In another window, ran another operation.
  - Got useful/sensible errors for both ssh and web lock holders, for example:

> PhutilProxyException: Failed to acquire read lock after waiting 1 second(s). You may be able to retry later. (This lock was most recently acquired by a process (pid=12609, host=orbital-3.local, sapi=apache2handler, controller=PhabricatorConduitAPIController, method=diffusion.rawdiffquery) 3 second(s) ago. There is no record of this lock being released.)

> PhutilProxyException: Failed to acquire read lock after waiting 1 second(s). You may be able to retry later. (This lock was most recently acquired by a process (pid=65251, host=orbital-3.local, sapi=cli, argv=/Users/epriestley/dev/core/lib/phabricator/bin/ssh-exec --phabricator-ssh-device local.phacility.net --phabricator-ssh-key 2) 2 second(s) ago. There is no record of this lock being released.)

Reviewers: amckinley

Reviewed By: amckinley

Maniphest Tasks: T13202

Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D19702
2018-09-24 15:20:07 -07:00
epriestley
7db265cd5d Parameterize the repository read and write locks
Summary:
Ref T13202. See PHI889. Update the read and write locks to the modern parameterized verison, which handles hashing/normalization and can store better logs.

This parameterized mode was added in D19173 and has been used successfully for some time, but not all locks have switched over to it yet.

Test Plan:
- Added an `fprintf(STDERR, $full_name)` to the lock code.
- Pulled a repository.
- Saw sensible lock name on stdout before "acquired read lock...".
- Additional changes in this patch series will vet this more completely.

Reviewers: amckinley

Reviewed By: amckinley

Maniphest Tasks: T13202

Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D19701
2018-09-24 15:14:28 -07:00
epriestley
3244324cb1 Fix comment box borders in timelines after Phriction commenting
Summary:
Ref T13202. In D19660, I added comments to Phriction and tweaked some CSS.

One of these tweaks was getting rid of an extra border which was rendering under the comment area. However, I took off too much and ended up removing borders from other applications.

I think we don't actually need this `setNoBorder()` stuff after all -- a later change was sufficient to stop the actual border I was trying to get rid of from rendering. So this mostly just reverts part of D19660.

This rendering still isn't perfect, but I'm fine leaving that for another day for now.

Test Plan:
  - Viewed comment areas in Phriction. Saw correct number of borders (1).
  - Viewed comment areas in Maniphest. Saw correct number of borders (1).
  - Grepped for extraneous removed classs, no hits.

Reviewers: amckinley

Reviewed By: amckinley

Maniphest Tasks: T13202

Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D19684
2018-09-19 13:56:58 -07:00
epriestley
5ba66e56fd Fix Phriction rendering for initial install and 404 pages
Summary:
Depends on D19682. Ref T13202. We currently fatal when trying to render a timeline if:

  - an install is fresh, so there are no pages yet, and you look at "/w/"; or
  - you're looking at a Phriction page which doesn't exist (yet) like "/w/aadsflknadsflnf/".

Rendering a timeline and comment area doesn't make sense in these cases, so don't render them.

Test Plan: Hit both cases described above, got "new/empty page" prompts instead of fatals.

Reviewers: amckinley

Maniphest Tasks: T13202

Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D19683
2018-09-17 20:02:59 -07:00
epriestley
e5c6a5749a Fix fatal in rendering Phriction "Moved Away" stories
Summary:
Ref T13202. See PHI881. These stories have bad rendering methods, but they didn't previously render into the timeilne (since Phriction documents didn't have a timeline).

Update the rendering to work.

The rendered outcome isn't great (it isn't very clear or explicit about exactly what moved where), but I'll fix that in a followup. This is a net improvement since it doesn't fatal the page, at least.

Test Plan:
  - Moved page "X" to "Y".
  - Viewed the old page "X".
  - Before patch: bad timeline story would fatal rendering.
  - After patch: story renders, at least, just not great.

Reviewers: amckinley

Maniphest Tasks: T13202

Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D19682
2018-09-17 20:02:06 -07:00
epriestley
0167f357b7 Provide a convenient way to log arbitrary text in Drydock without needing structured log classes
Summary: Depends on D19673. Ref T13197. See PHI873.

Test Plan:
Added some code like this:

```
$operation->logText('Nice convenient text logging.');
```

...then got:

{F5887712}

Reviewers: amckinley

Reviewed By: amckinley

Subscribers: PHID-OPKG-gm6ozazyms6q6i22gyam

Maniphest Tasks: T13197

Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D19674
2018-09-15 07:59:50 -07:00
epriestley
a7e060f062 Write a trivial log when starting a repository operation
Summary:
Depends on D19672. Ref T13197. See PHI873. This writes a trivial log when we begin acting on a working copy and makes it look reasonable in the UI.

This is mostly just to prove that logging works properly.

Test Plan: {F5887697}

Reviewers: amckinley

Reviewed By: amckinley

Subscribers: PHID-OPKG-gm6ozazyms6q6i22gyam

Maniphest Tasks: T13197

Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D19673
2018-09-15 07:57:11 -07:00
epriestley
92bcf85974 Add Drydock logs to the RepositoryOperation UI
Summary:
Depends on D19671. Ref T13197. See PHI873.

Expose logs in the RepositoryOperation UI. Nothing writes the logs yet, so these interfaces are currently always empty.

Test Plan:
{F5887102}

{F5887103}

Reviewers: amckinley

Reviewed By: amckinley

Subscribers: PHID-OPKG-gm6ozazyms6q6i22gyam

Maniphest Tasks: T13197

Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D19672
2018-09-15 07:56:35 -07:00
epriestley
10f219fb82 Allow Drydock logs to be associated with RepositoryOperation objects
Summary: Ref T13197. See PHI873. I want to give RepositoryOperation objects access to Drydock logging like leases, resources, and blueprints currently have. This just does the schema/query changes, no actual UI or new logging yet.

Test Plan: Ran storage upgrade, poked around the UI looking for anything broken.

Reviewers: amckinley

Reviewed By: amckinley

Subscribers: PHID-OPKG-gm6ozazyms6q6i22gyam

Maniphest Tasks: T13197

Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D19671
2018-09-15 07:55:14 -07:00
epriestley
40d5d5c984 Remove "mailKey" from "PhabricatorRepositoryCommit"
Summary: Ref T13197. Ref T13065. This continues the gradual purge of dedicated "mailKey" columns in favor of shared infrastructure.

Test Plan:
  - Ran migration.
  - Visually inspected database.
  - Grepped for `mailKey`.
  - Added some comments, saw the daemons generate corresponding mail.

Reviewers: amckinley

Reviewed By: amckinley

Subscribers: PHID-OPKG-gm6ozazyms6q6i22gyam

Maniphest Tasks: T13197, T13065

Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D19670
2018-09-15 07:54:15 -07:00
epriestley
2ddc770fd8 Update Phriction documentation for drafts
Summary: Depends on D19668. Ref T13197. See PHI840. This updates the documentation to describe how drafts work in more detail.

Test Plan: Read documentation.

Reviewers: amckinley

Reviewed By: amckinley

Maniphest Tasks: T13197

Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D19669
2018-09-13 14:16:19 -07:00
epriestley
0abf29765e Make Phriction diff-of-changes view draft-aware and clarify some language
Summary:
Ref T13077. Ref T13197. See PHI840.

  - In the "History > Diff/Compare" view, the button language wasn't draft-aware.
  - Revise language to avoid the word "Revert", since this can be ambiguous.
    - "Edit this page, starting with an older version of the text" is now "Edit Older|Current|Draft Version X".
    - "Mark this older version of the page as the current published version" is now "Publish Older Version".
  - Let the user edit the current published version, too, since this is a reasonable operation if there are drafts.

Test Plan: Navigated the history diff view, saw better button and action text.

Reviewers: amckinley

Reviewed By: amckinley

Maniphest Tasks: T13197, T13077

Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D19668
2018-09-13 14:12:49 -07:00
epriestley
0089ef4b60 Don't show Phriction draft edit events in feed
Summary: Depends on D19663. Ref T13077. When you edit a Phriction draft, don't publish a feed story. (The eventual "Publish" event gets a story.)

Test Plan: Made draft / non-draft / publish edits, only saw feed stories for non-draft and publish edits.

Reviewers: amckinley

Reviewed By: amckinley

Maniphest Tasks: T13077

Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D19664
2018-09-12 13:56:10 -07:00
epriestley
b6ba75d991 Add a Phriction hint when a draft exists, and fix some draft editing bugs
Summary:
Depends on D19662. Ref T13077. See PHI840.

  - If you're looking at the published version of a document, but a draft version exists and you can edit it, add a hint/link.
  - Fix an issue where the "draft" transaction would complain when you created a document since the initial content is empty and no "draft" transaction is adding any content.

Test Plan: Created new documents, viewed documents with current published versions and unpublished drafts.

Reviewers: amckinley

Reviewed By: amckinley

Maniphest Tasks: T13077

Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D19663
2018-09-12 13:45:33 -07:00
epriestley
550028a882 Allow Phriction document edits to be saved as drafts
Summary:
Depends on D19661. Ref T13077. See PHI840.

When a user edits a page normally, add a "Save as Draft" button. Much of this change is around making that button render and behave properly: it needs to be an `<input type="submit" ...>` so browsers submit it and we can figure out which button the user clicked.

Then there are a few minor rules:

  - If you're editing a page which is already a draft, we only give you "Save as Draft". This makes edits to update/revise a draft more natural.
  - Highlight "Publish" if it's a likely action that you might want to take.

Internally, there are two types of edits. Both types create a new version with the new content. However:

  - A "content" edit sets the version shown on the live page to the newly-created version.
  - A "draft" edit does not update the version shown on the live page.

Test Plan: Edited a published document, edited the draft. Published documents. Reverted documents.

Reviewers: amckinley

Reviewed By: amckinley

Maniphest Tasks: T13077

Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D19662
2018-09-12 13:30:40 -07:00
epriestley
152e7713eb Remove obsolete, nonfunctional draft auto-saving in Phriction
Summary:
Depends on D19660. Ref T5811. Ref T13077.

Long ago, if you started editing a Phriction document but didn't save it, we'd save the draft in the background as part of the preview.

D11169 updated the preview to use shared infrastructure and broke this function, since we never save drafts.

Since this doesn't work right now, I want to add another thing called "draft", and the future of this feature should be more integrated with modern drafts and EditEngine (which fixed some bugs related to versioning), just get rid of this code for the moment.

Test Plan: Edited documents. This code doesn't do anything since D11169, so no behavior changed.

Reviewers: amckinley

Reviewed By: amckinley

Maniphest Tasks: T13077, T5811

Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D19661
2018-09-12 13:22:16 -07:00
epriestley
e19c555913 Support (basic) commenting on Phriction documents
Summary:
Depends on D19659. Fixes T1894. Ref T13077. See PHI840.

  - Add an EditEngine, although it currently supports no fields.
  - Add (basic, top-level-only) commenting (we already had the table in the database).

This will probably create some issues. I'm most concerned about documents accumulating a ton of old, irrelevant comments over time which are hard to keep track of and no longer relevant. But I think this is probably a step forward in almost all cases, and a good thing on the balance.

This also moves us incrementally toward putting all editing on top of EditEngine.

Test Plan: {F5877347}

Reviewers: amckinley

Reviewed By: amckinley

Maniphest Tasks: T13077, T1894

Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D19660
2018-09-12 13:20:52 -07:00
epriestley
f5e90a363e When a user takes actions while in a high security session, note it on the resulting transactions
Summary:
Ref T13197. See PHI873. Record when a user has MFA'd and add a little icon to the transaction, similar to the exiting "Silent" icon.

For now, this just makes this stuff more auditable. Future changes may add ways to require MFA for certain specific transactions, outside of the ones that already always require MFA (like revealing credentials).

Test Plan: {F5877960}

Reviewers: amckinley

Reviewed By: amckinley

Maniphest Tasks: T13197

Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D19665
2018-09-12 12:57:02 -07:00
epriestley
8268abcb78 Enrich "diffusion.commit.search" with identity, status, and message information
Summary:
Depends on D19657. Ref T13197. See PHI841.

This enriches the results from `diffusion.commit.search` with information similar to the information returned by the "commits" attachment from `differential.diff.search`.

Also include unreachable, imported, message, audit status, and repository PHID.

Test Plan: Called `diffusion.commit.search` and reviewed the results, which looked sensible.

Reviewers: amckinley

Reviewed By: amckinley

Maniphest Tasks: T13197

Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D19658
2018-09-12 12:45:44 -07:00