Summary: Ref T6031. I figure its totally cool to include the user creating the task as a subscriber, even if from the template case, so just do that there too. Code is written such that if the user wasn't already in the subscriber case they end up being the last person in the tokenizer. Theoretically this should make any users who didn't want to be automagically subscribed via the create from template case to remove themselves.
Test Plan: made a template from a task that didn't have me as a subscriber initially and observed i was a subscriber.
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: epriestley, Korvin
Maniphest Tasks: T6031
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10408
Summary: Fixes T6029. We should append custom fields last so they show up after things like projects, tokens, etc that render via UI events.
Test Plan: viewed a task with custom fields and projects was last
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: epriestley, Korvin
Maniphest Tasks: T6029
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10407
Summary: Ref T3307. Only one I thought was tricky was Excel; I went with bytes there like it was email.
Test Plan: played around on a few endpoints but mostly thought carefully
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: epriestley, Korvin
Maniphest Tasks: T3307
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10392
Summary:
Fixes T5140. When you ajax-edit a task and we send back a full-size card, we currently always put a drag grip on it.
If you clicked the "edit" thing from a priority-ordered list, this is appropriate. However, if you clicked it from some other type of list, it is not.
Pass the expected grippableness through the call.
Test Plan:
- Edited a task from a reorderable (priority-ordered) view, got grip.
- Edited a task from a nonreorderable (author-ordered) view, got no grip.
Reviewers: btrahan, chad
Reviewed By: chad
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T5140
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10282
Summary: Fixes T5769. Fixes T5861. Add mail tags for "unblock" and "column change".
Test Plan: Did unblocks and column changes, verified the mail got the right mailtags and recipient nondelivery flags.
Reviewers: chad, btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T5861, T5769
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10241
Summary:
Ref T5861. Currently, mail tags are hard-coded; move them into applications. Each Editor defines its own tags.
This has zero impact on the UI or behavior.
Test Plan:
- Checked/unchecked some options, saved form.
- Swapped back to `master` and saw exactly the same values.
Reviewers: chad, btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T5861
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10238
Summary: Fixes T5859. This doesn't change much, but makes the transaction record a little more accurate and activates stuff like `#hashtags` and `{F123}` causing policy associations.
Test Plan: Used `bin/mail receive-test` and mail receiver script to send bug mail, saw hashtags imply projects.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T5859
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10229
Summary:
Fixes T5184. Fixes T5008. Three issues with stories/notifications about changing the status of tasks which block other tasks:
**Bad Feed Stories**
- Problem: Feed story rendering was confusing (T5184).
- Solution: fix it to provide context.
**Too Many Feed Stories**
- Problem: Feed gets a story for the original task's close ("a closed x"), and a story for each blocked task ("a closed x, a task blocking y").
- "Solution": Punt. These are redundant in the full feed but not in filtered feeds. Right solution is display-time aggregation. No users have really complained about this.
**Too Many Notifications**
- Problem: Users subscribed to both tasks get notified about the clsoe, and also about the unblocked task. These notifications are redundant.
- "Solution": Punt. This is easy to fix by silencing notifications for the sub-editor, but I'm worried it would be confusing. Users haven't complained. Display-time aggregation might be a better fix.
Test Plan: {F189463}
Reviewers: btrahan, chad
Reviewed By: chad
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T5008, T5184
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10235
Summary: To assist with {T5245}, I have added projects back into the lipsum maniphest generator with the edge infrastructure.
Test Plan: Run the lipsum script for PhabricatorManiphestTaskTestDataGenerator and make sure it generates project data.
Reviewers: #blessed_reviewers, epriestley
Reviewed By: #blessed_reviewers, epriestley
Subscribers: epriestley, Korvin
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10202
Summary:
- Fixes T5851. Currently, if a commit has `Fixes T123`, we generate an email with just that before generating the commit email. Don't send/publish transactions about a commit before it imports (this is a tiny bit hacky, but well-contained and I don't think it causes any problems).
- Fixes T4864. Currently, we try to parse Differential information even if Differential is not installed. Instead, do this only if Differential is installed.
- Fixes T5771. Currently, if we can't figure out who the committer/author of a commit is, we don't publish a `Fixes T123` transaction. Instead, fall back to acting as "Diffusion" if we can't find a better actor. Most of this diff expands the role of application actors. The existing application actors (Herald and Harbormaster) seem to be working well.
Test Plan:
- Pushed a commit with `Fixes T123` and verified it did not generate email directly. (The task half of the transaction still does, correctly.)
- Uninstalled Differential and pushed a commit, got a clean import instead of an exception.
- Commented out author/committer PHIDs and pushed stuff, saw a "Diffusion" actor.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T5771, T4864, T5851
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10221
Summary: Fixes T5829. This stuff is old and busted, but keep it working for now.
Test Plan: No more fatal when there are recently closed tasks.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T5829
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10201
Summary:
Via the UI adding a mailinglist for CC works, but via
the API currently it shows:
>One or more PHIDs were invalid for ccPHIDS
This removes the user validation check for ccPHIDs.
(I left it in for other things like owner since that seems
still appropriate?)
Test Plan:
used arc locally to add a mailinglist to cc
```echo '{"id": 2, "ccPHIDs": ["PHID-MLST-ohduchbv4dfimk7opt3r"]}' | arc call-conduit maniphest.update```
Reviewers: #blessed_reviewers, epriestley
Reviewed By: #blessed_reviewers, epriestley
Subscribers: epriestley, Korvin
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10193
Summary:
Ref T4807. This is probably a complete fix, but I'd be surprised if there isn't a little cleanup I missed.
When users drag tasks on a "natural"-ordered workboard, leave things where they put them.
This isn't //too// bad since a lot of the existing work is completely reusable (e.g., we don't need any new JS).
Test Plan:
- Dragged a bunch of stuff around, it stayed where I put it after dropped and when reloaded.
- Dragged stuff across priorities, no zany priority changes (in "natural" mode).
- Created new tasks, they show up at the top.
- Tagged new tasks, they show up at the top of backlog.
- Swapped to "priority" mode and got sorting and the old priority-altering reordering.
- Added tasks in priority mode.
- Viewed task transactions for correctness/sanity.
Reviewers: btrahan, chad
Reviewed By: chad
Subscribers: chad, epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T4807
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10182
Summary:
Ref T4807. This is an alternative to D10179. The problem these diffs solve is that I want to be able to reorder a column's positions without having to load the actual objects, but that's difficutl because two positions may have the same sequence number (and I think it's good that we allow that, since it makes a bunch of other stuff way easier).
Instead of using the object ID (e.g., the task ID) to reorder positions with the same sequence, use the position itself. This is a little easier, is less ambiguous if columns eventually have several types of objects, and produces a better behavior when old objects are freshly added to a board. For example, if you tag `T300` with `#project`, this new rule will push it to the top of "Backlog" while the old rule might have buried it deep. I think this behavior is desirable and more "natural".
When creating a group of new rows, we do order the batch by ID, so a group of freshly-tagged objects float to the top togehter in ID order. This seems like the most natural rule, too.
Test Plan:
- Loaded some boards with implicit objects on them (freshly tagged tasks) and saw rows create.
- Verified new rows created in the right order.
- Dragged some tasks around.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T4807
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10180
Summary:
Ref T4807. This doesn't actually do anything yet, but adds a dropdown menu for choosing an ordering and gets all the UI working correctly.
This also fixes a bug where column hidden state wouldn't persist across filter changes.
(I won't land this until it does something, but the next diff will probably be a mess so this seemed like a clean place to sever things.)
Test Plan:
{F187114}
- Altered sort ordering.
- Altered hidden state and filters, verified all states persisted correctly.
- Added `phlog()` to edit/create and move controllers and verified they receive sort information.
Reviewers: btrahan, chad
Reviewed By: chad
Subscribers: swisspol, chad, epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T4807
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10178
Summary:
Ref T5245. This removes some hacks and activates two meaningful interactions:
- The "projects" field goes through shared code now.
- Mentioning projects in tasks using hashtags now tags them.
Test Plan:
- Viewed a task with projects.
- Viewed a task with no projects.
- Viewed a task with projects and board positions.
- Viewed a revision with projects.
- Made a `#hashtag` comment in Maniphest and got a project association.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T5245
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10177
Summary:
Fixes T5476. Using edges to store which objects are on which board columns ends up being pretty awkward. In particular, it makes T4807 very difficult to implement.
Introduce a dedicated `BoardColumnPosition` storage.
This doesn't affect ordering rules (T4807) yet: boards are still arranged by priority. We just read which tasks are on which columns out of a new table.
Test Plan:
- Migrated data, then viewed some boards. Saw exactly the same data.
- Dragged tasks from column to column.
- Created a task directly into a column.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T5476
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10160
Summary:
Ref T4896. Now that we have a transaction editor, we can delete a giant block of hacks.
I believe this also resolves the commit/task attachment issues @joshuaspence and @mbishopim3 mentioned.
Test Plan: Attached and detached commits and tasks.
Reviewers: btrahan, joshuaspence, mbishopim3
Reviewed By: mbishopim3
Subscribers: mbishopim3, epriestley, joshuaspence
Maniphest Tasks: T4896
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10138
Summary:
Ref T4589. We don't recognize task descriptions as remarkup blocks, so `{F...}` references in them do not get attached to the objects, and thus no policy exemption is created.
Recognize them, which activates `{F...}` and `@mentions`.
We probably have a few more of these in other applications, but it's not a big deal to clean them up as they arise.
Test Plan: Uploaded a file to a task in the description field, saw it attach and get a policy exemption.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T4589
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10139
Summary:
Resolves T4659. This implements support for sorting tasks by custom fields.
Some of this feels hacky in the way it's hooked up to the Maniphest search engine and task query.
Test Plan: Queryed on a custom date field, with a small page size, and moved back and forth through the result set.
Reviewers: #blessed_reviewers, epriestley
Reviewed By: #blessed_reviewers, epriestley
Subscribers: epriestley, Korvin
Maniphest Tasks: T4659
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10106
Summary: Fixes T5751. Currently, we incorrectly overwrite `$xactions`.
Test Plan: Closed a blocking task, got an email about the correct transaction set ("closed task; added comment") instead of an overwritten transaction set ("closed blocking task").
Reviewers: chad, btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T5751
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10088
Summary: At least on my install, sorting was pretty borked from a type issue. (e.g. "unbreak now" of 100 sorting as less than "High" of 90). Fix this with some parseInt action. Also support adding new cards with the new colsort stuff. The clever bit here is to include the task ID in the sorting vector because the task ID wins ties at the moment I think / new tasks need to show up before older tasks when they are initially created. Fixes T5716.
Test Plan: added many "normal" priority cards and saw them fly in correctly. changed priority and moved correctly. made no edits and no moves were made correctly.
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: epriestley, Korvin
Maniphest Tasks: T5716
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10081
Summary: Instead of implementing the `getCapabilityKey` method in all subclasses of `PhabricatorPolicyCapability`, provide a `final` implementation in the base class which uses reflection. See D9837 and D9985 for similar implementations.
Test Plan: N/A
Reviewers: epriestley, #blessed_reviewers
Reviewed By: epriestley, #blessed_reviewers
Subscribers: epriestley, Korvin, hach-que
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10039
Summary: Ref T5655. Rename `PhabricatorPHIDType` subclasses for clarity (see discussion in D9839). I'm not too keen on some of the resulting class names, so feel free to suggest alternatives.
Test Plan: Ran unit tests.
Reviewers: epriestley, #blessed_reviewers
Reviewed By: epriestley, #blessed_reviewers
Subscribers: epriestley, Korvin, hach-que
Maniphest Tasks: T5655
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D9986
Summary: Provide an implementation for the `getName` method rather than automagically determining the application name.
Test Plan: Saw reasonable application names in the launcher.
Reviewers: #blessed_reviewers, epriestley
Reviewed By: #blessed_reviewers, epriestley
Subscribers: epriestley, Korvin
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10027
Summary: Ref T5655. Some discussion in D9839. Generally speaking, `Phabricator{$name}Application` is clearer than `PhabricatorApplication{$name}`.
Test Plan:
# Pinned and uninstalled some applications.
# Applied patch and performed migrations.
# Verified that the pinned applications were still pinned and that the uninstalled applications were still uninstalled.
# Performed a sanity check on the database contents.
Reviewers: btrahan, epriestley, #blessed_reviewers
Reviewed By: epriestley, #blessed_reviewers
Subscribers: hach-que, epriestley, Korvin
Maniphest Tasks: T5655
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D9982
Summary: Instead of implementing the `getTypeConstant` method in all subclasses of `PhabricatorPHIDType`, provide a `final` implementation in the base class which uses reflection. See D9837 for a similar implementation.
Test Plan: Ran `arc unit`.
Reviewers: #blessed_reviewers, epriestley
Reviewed By: #blessed_reviewers, epriestley
Subscribers: epriestley, Korvin, hach-que
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D9985
Summary: Ref T5655. The `PhabricatorDestructibleInterface` interface is misspelled as `PhabricatorDestructableInterface`. Fix the spelling mistake.
Test Plan: `grep`. Seeing as this interface is fairly recent, I don't expect that this would cause any widespread breakages.
Reviewers: epriestley, #blessed_reviewers
Reviewed By: epriestley, #blessed_reviewers
Subscribers: epriestley, Korvin
Maniphest Tasks: T5655
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D9988
Summary: Fixes T5661. We may now pick up a conflicting `dateCreated` field from an edge table join.
Test Plan: Ran a project + dateCreated filtering query, no longer got an exception.
Reviewers: btrahan, joshuaspence
Reviewed By: joshuaspence
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T5661
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D9997
Summary: Ref T4420. This one is users plus "upforgrabs". I renamed that to "none" and gave it a special visual style to make it more discoverable. Future diffs will improve this.
Test Plan:
- Used it in global search.
- Used it in batch editor.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T4420
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D9891
Summary: Ref T4420. This is just "project", plus the special "no project" token, but that doesn't actually work. Replace it with a normal project typeahead. This is only used in Maniphest's reports.
Test Plan: Searched for a couple of projects in reports.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T4420
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D9890
Summary:
Ref T5245. We'll still display the old ones, but write real edge transactions now -- not TYPE_PROJECTS transactions.
Some code remains to show the existing transactions. The next diff will modernize the old transactions so we can remove this code.
Test Plan:
- Previewed a project-editing comment.
- Submitted a project-editing comment.
- Edited a task's projects.
- Batch edited a task's projects.
Reviewers: joshuaspence, chad, btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T5245
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D9852
Summary: Ref T5245. This property predates edges and is unusual in modern applications. Stop writes to it and populate it implicitly from edges when querying.
Test Plan:
- Viewed task list.
- Created a task.
- Added and removed projects from tasks.
Reviewers: joshuaspence, chad, btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T5245
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D9851
Summary: Ref T5245. This moves the actual storage over and stops reads and writes to the old table.
Test Plan:
- Verified tasks retained projects across the migration.
- Added and removed projects from tasks.
- Searched for: all, any, users' projects, not-in-projects, no-projects.
Reviewers: chad, btrahan, joshuaspence
Reviewed By: joshuaspence
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T5245
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D9850
Summary: Ref T5245. With work elsewhere (notably, D9839) we can remove this TODO and use real transactions.
Test Plan: Pushed a `closes Txxx` commit and got a close + transaction.
Reviewers: chad, btrahan, joshuaspence
Reviewed By: joshuaspence
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T5245
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D9848
Summary:
Ref T5245. These were a bad idea.
We no longer need actors for edge edits either, so remove those. Generally, edges have fit into the policy model as pure/low-level infrastructure, and they do not have any policy or capability information in and of themselves.
Test Plan: `grep`
Reviewers: chad, btrahan, joshuaspence
Reviewed By: joshuaspence
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T5245
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D9840
Summary:
Ref T5245. See some discussion in D9838.
When we attach object A to object B, we'd like to write transactions on both sides but only write the actual edges once.
To do this, allow edge types to `shouldWriteInverseTransactions()`. When an edge type opts into this, have editors apply the inverse transactions before writing the edge. These inverse transactions don't actually apply effects, they just show up in the transaction log.
Test Plan: Attached and detached revisions from tasks, saw transactions appear on both sides of the operation.
Reviewers: chad, btrahan, joshuaspence
Reviewed By: btrahan, joshuaspence
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T5245
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D9839
Summary:
Ref T5245. A very long time ago I had this terrible idea that we'd let objects react to edges being added and insert transactions in response.
This turned out to be a clearly bad idea very quickly, for like 15 different reasons. A big issue is that it inverts the responsibilities of editors. It's also just clumsy and messy.
We now have `PhabricatorApplicationTransactionInterface` instead, which mostly provides a cleaner way to deal with this.
Implement `PhabricatorApplicationTransactionInterface`, implicitly moving all the attach actions (task/task, task/revision, task/commit, task/mock) to proper edge transactions.
The cost of this is that the inverse edges don't write transactions -- if you attach an object to another object, only the object you were acting on posts a transaction record. This is sort of buggy anyway already. I'll fix this in the next diff.
Test Plan: Attached tasks, revisions and mocks to a task, then detached them.
Reviewers: chad, btrahan, joshuaspence
Reviewed By: joshuaspence
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T5245
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D9838
Summary: Ref T5245. Currently, task/project links rely on side effects in `save()`. Make them more transaction-oriented, with the goal of moving fully to edges a few diffs down the line.
Test Plan:
- Added and removed projects using "Edit Task", "Associate Projects" comment action, and Herald.
- Verified database ended up in the expected state.
Reviewers: chad, btrahan, joshuaspence
Reviewed By: joshuaspence
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T5245
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D9833
Summary: Ref T4420. Update "projects" source.
Test Plan:
- Edited projects on a Differential revision.
- Edited projects on a commit.
- Edited projects on a repository.
- Edited projects in feed search.
- Edited projects in a Herald rule field.
- Edited projects in a Herald rule action.
- Edited projects in Maniphest batch editor.
- Edited projects on Maniphest task.
- Edited projects in "Associate Projects..." action in Maniphest.
- Edited projects on Maniphest search in "all projects", "any project" and "not projects" fields.
- Edited projects on a Paste.
- Edited projects on a Pholio mock.
- Edited projects on a custom policy rule.
- Edited projects on a Ponder question.
- Edited projects on a Diffusion search query.
- Edited projects on a global search query.
- Edited projects on a slowvote.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T4420
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D9884
Summary: change typeahead placeholder to include 'or "upforgrabs" to unassign...' Fixes T2267. Well, makes it as good as its going to be until we get some new space age UI.
Test Plan: new text looks okay-ish
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: epriestley, Korvin
Maniphest Tasks: T2267
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D9882
Summary:
Ref T5476. Currently, the task edit code assumes it knows what the UI looks like and sends back where on the column an item should be inserted.
This is buggy after adding filters, and relatively complex. Instead, send down the ordering on the whole column and sort it in the UI. This is a bit simpler overall and more general. It makes it easier to further generalize this code for T5476.
Test Plan:
- Edited a task on a board, changing priority. Saw it reorder properly.
- Edited a task on a board in a field of other tasks at the same top-level priority. Saw it refresh without reordering.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T5476
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D9832
