1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://we.phorge.it/source/phorge.git synced 2024-11-28 17:52:43 +01:00
Commit graph

1793 commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
epriestley
b8f75f9511 Improve Conduit performance for custom fields
Summary:
Ref T11404. Depends on D16350.

Currently, custom fields can issue "N+1" queries in some cases, so querying 100 revisions issues 100 extra queries.

This affects all `*.search` endpoints for objects with custom fields, and some older endpoints (notably `differential.query`).

This change bulk loads "normal" custom fields, which gets rid of some of these queries. Instead of loading fields for each object, we build a big list of all fields and load them all at once.

The next change will tackle the remaining inefficient edge queries.

Test Plan:
  - Configured a custom field with normal database storage in Differential.
  - Ran `differential.query`, looking at custom fields in results for correctness.
  - Ran `differential.revision.search`, looking at custom fields in results for correctness.
  - In both cases, observed queries drop from `3N` to `2N` (all the "normal" custom field stuff got bulk loaded).

Reviewers: yelirekim, chad

Reviewed By: chad

Maniphest Tasks: T11404

Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D16351
2016-07-31 11:15:58 -07:00
epriestley
b6daa049de Rename Event "userPHID" to "hostPHID"
Summary: Ref T10909. Ref T9224. We label this field "Host" in the UI; make the storage format consistent.

Test Plan:
  - Viewed month view, day view, detail view of an event.
  - Created a new event, saw myself as the host.

Reviewers: chad

Reviewed By: chad

Maniphest Tasks: T9224, T10909

Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D16291
2016-07-13 15:39:55 -07:00
Chad Little
e2d195e03a Fix mobile menu for files in Differential Changesets
Summary: Fixes T11305, Ref T7754. Makes this menu dropdown act like actions and collapse to a fa-bars menu.

Test Plan:
View on mobile, desktop, browser. Click an action, spawn new page.

{F1717953}

Reviewers: epriestley

Reviewed By: epriestley

Subscribers: Korvin

Maniphest Tasks: T7754, T11305

Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D16265
2016-07-09 14:25:48 -07:00
epriestley
bc3ac31584 Don't load the entire graph for tasks
Summary:
Ref T4788. As it turns out, our tasks are very tightly connected.

Instead of loading every parent/child task, then every parent/child of those tasks, etc., etc., only load tasks in the "same direction" that we're already heading.

For example, we load children of children, but not parents of children. And we load parents of parents, but not children of parents.

Basically we only go "up" and "down" now, but not "out" as much. This should reduce the gigantic multiple-thousand-node graphs currently shown in the UI.

I still discover the whole graph for revisiosn, because I think it's probably more useful and always much smaller. That might need adjustment too, though.

Test Plan: Seems fine locally??

Reviewers: chad

Reviewed By: chad

Maniphest Tasks: T4788

Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D16218
2016-07-01 11:43:14 -07:00
epriestley
cc7ae60aaf Make the revision graph view more flexible
Summary:
Ref T4788. This separates the revision graph view into a base class with core logic and a revision class with Differential-specific logic, so I can subclass it in Maniphest, etc., and try using it in other applications to show similar graphs.

Not sure if we'll stick with it, but even if we don't this makes the code a bit cleaner and gets custom rendering logic out of the RevisionViewController, which is nice.

Test Plan: Viewed revisions, saw the stack UI completely unchanged.

Reviewers: chad

Reviewed By: chad

Maniphest Tasks: T4788

Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D16213
2016-07-01 10:40:49 -07:00
epriestley
dc37789d53 Build that thing someone posted a screenshot of on Facebook
Summary: Seemed kinda cool.

Test Plan: {F1707244}

Reviewers: chad

Reviewed By: chad

Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D16210
2016-07-01 04:36:24 -07:00
epriestley
6c7e392f89 Merge "Table of Contents", "Local Commits", "Update History" and "Similar Revisions"
Summary: Ref T10628. Turn these into tabs in a single box, since "local commits" and "similar revisions" are of particularly rare use.

Test Plan: {F1707196}

Reviewers: chad

Reviewed By: chad

Maniphest Tasks: T10628

Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D16209
2016-06-30 18:50:52 -07:00
epriestley
5a4ecc7a9c Convert "Diff Details" tabs to PHUITabGroup
Summary:
Ref T10628. Switch this to be nicer and more modern.

  - When there's only one tab, add an option to hide it.

Test Plan:
  - Viewed normal revisions (no tabs).
  - Viewed X vs Y revisions (two tabs, rightmost tab selected by default).

Reviewers: chad

Reviewed By: chad

Maniphest Tasks: T10628

Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D16206
2016-06-30 18:49:51 -07:00
epriestley
7574f8dcf5 When all actions in a submenu are disabled, disable the submenu header
Summary: Fixes T11240. Also simplify things a little and share a bit more code.

Test Plan:
  - Viewed revisions and tasks, opened submenu.
  - Viewed as a user without edit permission, saw the menus greyed out.

Reviewers: chad

Reviewed By: chad

Maniphest Tasks: T11240

Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D16201
2016-06-30 10:57:33 -07:00
epriestley
dc9283b85d Convert all standard relationship-editing actions to modern Relationships code
Summary: Ref T4788. This moves everything except "merge" to the new code.

Test Plan:
  - Edited relationships in Differential, Diffusion, and Pholio.
  - Uninstalled Pholio, made sure "Edit Mocks..." actions vanished.

Reviewers: chad

Reviewed By: chad

Maniphest Tasks: T4788

Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D16193
2016-06-29 11:24:52 -07:00
Aviv Eyal
de6349dd67 Revision substate CLOSED_FROM_ACCEPTED
Summary:
Ref T9838.

Add a Properties field to Revision, and update a `wasAcceptedBeforeClose` when closing a revision.

Test Plan:
A quick run through the obvious steps (Close with commit/manually,  with or w/o accept) and calling `differential.query` shows the `wasAcceptedBeforeClose` property was setup correctly.

Pushing closed + accepted passes the relevant herald, which was my immediate issue; Pushing un-accepted is blocked.
Test the "commit" rule (Different from "pre-commit") by hacking the DB and running the "has accepted revision" rule in a test-console.

Reviewers: epriestley, #blessed_reviewers

Reviewed By: epriestley, #blessed_reviewers

Subscribers: Korvin, epriestley

Maniphest Tasks: T9838

Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15085
2016-06-27 20:29:47 +00:00
epriestley
bf62badfda Modularize "related objects" menu items in Maniphest
Summary:
Ref T11179. This generates the Maniphest menu items in a modular way. It doesn't change any of the underlying code yet.

Searching for commits doesn't work particularly well so I've just hidden that for now, but the item itself works fine.

Test Plan: {F1696849}

Reviewers: chad

Reviewed By: chad

Maniphest Tasks: T11179

Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D16162
2016-06-22 11:16:16 -07:00
epriestley
65634781b4 Don't re-mention users for comment edits
Summary:
Ref T11035. This only fixes half of the issue: comment editing has been fixed, but normal transactions which edit things like descriptions haven't yet.

The normal edits aren't fixed because the "oldValues" are populated too late. The code should start working once they get populated sooner, but I don't want to jump the gun on that since it'll probably have some spooky effects. I have some other transaction changes coming down the pipe which should provide a better context for testing "oldValue" population order.

Test Plan:
  - Mentioned `@dog` in a comment.
  - Removed `@dog` as a subscriber.
  - Edited the comment, adding some unrelated text at the end (e.g., fixing a typo).
    - Before change: `@dog` re-added as subscriber.
    - After change: no re-add.

Reviewers: chad

Reviewed By: chad

Maniphest Tasks: T11035

Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D16108
2016-06-13 13:57:59 -07:00
Shijie Feng
aaf3698666 Add datasources to allow search revisions by project.
Summary:
When having lots of repos, seeing "all revisions in this project" is hard, and we ended up adding herald rules to basically copy project tags to the revisions on a per-project basis. Adding a "tagged: project" function to the Repositories search field allows users to find differentials within a project.

Fix T10850.

Test Plan: search differentials by tagging project and repository in the Repository field

Reviewers: avivey, epriestley, #blessed_reviewers

Reviewed By: avivey, epriestley, #blessed_reviewers

Subscribers: Korvin, epriestley

Maniphest Tasks: T10850

Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D16096
2016-06-13 18:08:44 +00:00
epriestley
a88329fc38 Implement basic differential.revision.search
Summary: Ref T11123. This implements a very basic skeleton for modern revision search.

Test Plan: Viewed and executed Conduit API method.

Reviewers: chad

Reviewed By: chad

Maniphest Tasks: T11123

Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D16089
2016-06-09 09:06:58 -07:00
Aviv Eyal
e1119b3f31 Render more info for binary files in Differential
Summary:
Ref T10856. The rendering logic was already there, but it was expecting the information under `properties`
field, whereas arc puts it under `metadata`. Not sure if that something that changed a long time ago or if
it was always like this.

Test Plan: {F1252657 size=full}

Reviewers: #blessed_reviewers, epriestley

Reviewed By: #blessed_reviewers, epriestley

Subscribers: Korvin, epriestley

Maniphest Tasks: T10856

Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15828
2016-06-06 19:58:39 +00:00
epriestley
fc45de29a6 Modernize various menu collapse settings
Summary: Ref T4103. Fully modernize the filetree show/hide, durable column show/hide, and profile menu collapse/wide settings.

Test Plan:
  - Toggled filetree on/off, reloaded page, setting stuck.
  - Same with conpherence column and profile menus.

Reviewers: chad

Reviewed By: chad

Maniphest Tasks: T4103

Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D16034
2016-06-04 14:44:36 -07:00
Asher Baker
3849a69995 Modernize metamta.differential.patch-format
Summary: Change metamta.differential.patch-format over to an enum option now that they're implemented.

Test Plan: Looked at settings page.

Reviewers: #blessed_reviewers, epriestley

Reviewed By: #blessed_reviewers, epriestley

Subscribers: epriestley

Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D16032
2016-06-04 12:17:14 +00:00
epriestley
a34b769b4f Prevent creation of inline comments with mismatched changesetID / revisionPHID
Summary:
Ref T11092. With Quicksand (or, possibly, some as-yet-unknown non-Quicksand workflow) the client can get stuck with an out-of-date revision PHID.

We then save comments with a `revisionPHID` from one revision and a `changesetID` from a different one.

Detect and prevent this. This stops the workflow immediately when the use first clicks, so it should allow us to detect this issue if it has some other non-Quicksand cause.

Test Plan:
  - Opened revision `D123`.
  - Pressed `\` to enable the sidebar and Quicksand.
  - Clicked a link to revision `D124`.
  - Added inlines.

Previously, these could ghost. The exact UI behavior is difficult to describe, but in the database they end up with a `changesetID` for `D124` but the original `revisionPHID` for `D123`, presumably because state is sticking around from the first page.

After this patch, an exception is thrown immediately. Additionally:

  - Reloaded to clear quicksand state, added comments fine.
  - Disabled sidebar/quicksand, added comments fine.

Reviewers: chad

Reviewed By: chad

Maniphest Tasks: T11092

Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D16031
2016-06-03 13:48:49 -07:00
epriestley
edfc6a6934 Convert some loadPreferences() to getUserSetting()
Summary:
Ref T4103. This doesn't get everything, but takes care of most of the easy stuff.

The tricky-ish bit here is that I need to move timezones, pronouns and translations to proper settings. I expect to pursue that next.

Test Plan:
- Grepped for `loadPreferences` to identify callsites.
- Changed start-of-week setting, loaded Calendar, saw correct start.
- Visited welcome page, read "Adjust Settings" point.
- Loaded Conpherence -- I changed behavior here slightly (switching threads drops the title glyph) but it wasn't consistent to start with and this seems like a good thing to push to the next version of Conpherence.
- Enabled Filetree, toggled in Differential.
- Disabled Filetree, no longer visible in Differential.
- Changed "Unified Diffs" preference to "Small Screens" vs "Always".
- Toggled filetree in Diffusion.
- Edited a task, saw sensible projects in policy dropdown.
- Viewed user profile, uncollapsed/collapsed side nav, reloaded page, sticky'd.
- Toggled "monospaced textareas", used a comment box, got appropriate fonts.
- Toggled durable column.
- Disabled title glyphs.
- Changed monospaced font to 18px/36px impact.

Reviewers: chad

Reviewed By: chad

Maniphest Tasks: T4103

Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D16004
2016-06-02 06:29:20 -07:00
epriestley
92ea4fb098 Stop two special cache writes in read-only mode
Summary:
Ref T10769. The user availability cache write shouldn't happen in read-only mode, nor should the Differential parse cache write.

(We might want to turn off the availbility feature completely since it's potentially expensive if we can't cache it, but I think we're OK for now.)

Test Plan:
In read-only mode:

  - Browsed as a user with an out-of-date availability cache.
  - Loaded an older revision without cached parse data.

Reviewers: chad

Reviewed By: chad

Maniphest Tasks: T10769

Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15988
2016-05-30 10:12:09 -07:00
epriestley
e81637a6c6 Fix some issues with the "Explain Why" dialog
Summary:
Ref T11051. This is still not as clear as it should be, but is at least working as intended now.

I believe this part of the code just never worked. The test plan on D10489 didn't specifically cover it.

Test Plan:
Did this sort of thing in a repository:

```
$ git checkout -b featurex
$ echo x >> y
$ git commit -am wip
$ arc diff
```

Then I simulated just pushing it (this flow is a little more involved than necessary):

```
$ arc land --hold
$ git commit --amend
$ # remove all metadata -- particularly, "Differential Revision"!
$ git push HEAD:master
```

I got a not-great but more-useful dialog:

{F1667318}

Prior to this change, the hash match was incorrectly not reported at all.

Reviewers: chad

Reviewed By: chad

Maniphest Tasks: T11051

Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15989
2016-05-30 09:52:35 -07:00
epriestley
725d60eb4a Fix "Reviewers" validation issue with empty reviewers
Summary: Fixes T11021.

Test Plan: Created a revision without reviewers.

Reviewers: chad

Reviewed By: chad

Maniphest Tasks: T11021

Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15968
2016-05-23 17:16:21 -07:00
epriestley
e1ad312fdd Fix one more "Reviewers" wire format issue
Summary: Fixes T11010. This also needs to be inflated until we fix the whole client/server responsibility issue here.

Test Plan:
  - Created a revision while observing error log, no error.
  - Disabled "allow self accept", tried to make myself a reviewer, got rejected with an error message.

Reviewers: chad

Reviewed By: chad

Maniphest Tasks: T11010

Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15966
2016-05-23 12:48:34 -07:00
epriestley
45718268a9 Restore viewer() function to "Responsible Users" tokenizer in Differential
Summary:
Ref T10939. This makes the `viewer()` function work again. It retains its own meaning (viewer, plus all their projects and packages).

There's no `exact-viewer()` function; we could conceivably add one eventually if we need it.

Test Plan:
  - Queried for `viewer()`, got the same results as querying by my own username.
  - Browsed function in token browser.
  - Reviewed autogenerated documentation.

Reviewers: chad

Reviewed By: chad

Maniphest Tasks: T10939

Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15951
2016-05-19 15:21:20 -07:00
epriestley
7ae33d14ec Use new Differential bucketing logic on default (non-dashboard) homepage
Summary:
Ref T10939. If you haven't installed a dashboard, we show an "Active Revisions" panel on the homepage by default. I waited a bit to update this, but the new buckets don't seem to have caused any major problems so far.

Update this to use the new logic. I'm just showing "must review" + "should review", which is similar to the old beahvior.

Also replace the notification count with this same number. This is a little different from the old behavior, but simpler, and I think we should probably move toward getting rid of these counts completely.

Test Plan:
  - Viewed homepage as logged-in user, saw my revisions (including revisions I have authority over only because of project membership).
  - Saw consistent notification count.
  - Grepped for removed method.

Reviewers: chad

Reviewed By: chad

Maniphest Tasks: T10939

Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15950
2016-05-19 15:20:39 -07:00
Chad Little
5bb3cbe239 Add a "View Revision" button to HTML email
Summary:
Ref T10694. If this feels good, I'd plan to eventually add something similar to other applications ("View Task", etc).

Not sure if we should keep the object link later in the mail body or not. I left it for now.

Test Plan: {F1307256, size=full}

Reviewers: epriestley

Reviewed By: epriestley

Subscribers: Korvin

Maniphest Tasks: T10694

Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15884
2016-05-18 14:25:16 -07:00
epriestley
3aed39b8b0 Fix an issue with serializing reviewers over the wire
Fixes T10981. Ref T10939. `arc` currently has some odd, hard-coded checks
(missing reviewers, all reviewers away) that depend on the field value being
in a certain format.

The recent changes swapped the field value from scalars (PHIDs) to
dictionaries and broke this workflow. It worked fine in testing because we
apply these checks very inconsistently (not on update or `--edit`).

To get around this for now, serialize into "PHID!" and then unserialize on
the other side. This is icky but keeps us from needing to require an `arc`
upgrade.

These checks are generally bad news and should move to the server side in the
long run (T4631).

(This probably prevents clean `arc diff`, so I'm just cowboy committing it.)

Auditors: chad
2016-05-17 17:44:13 -07:00
epriestley
809c7bf996 Allow users to manage package dominion rules
Summary: Ref T10939. This adds UI, transactions, etc, to adjust dominion rules.

Test Plan:
  - Read documentation.
  - Changed dominion rules.
  - Created packages on `/` ("A") and `/x` ("B") with "Auto Review: Review".
  - Touched `/x`.
  - Verified that A and B were added with strong dominion.
  - Verified that only B was added when A was set to weak dominion.
  - Viewed file in Diffusion, saw correct ownership with strong/weak dominion rules.

Reviewers: chad

Reviewed By: chad

Maniphest Tasks: T10939

Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15936
2016-05-17 10:57:43 -07:00
epriestley
29a060d7f1 Allow blocking reviewers to be added via the CLI
Summary: Ref T10939. Fixes T4887. Supports "username!" to add a reviewer as blocking.

Test Plan: Added and removed blocking and non-blocking reviewers via CLI.

Reviewers: chad

Reviewed By: chad

Maniphest Tasks: T4887, T10939

Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15934
2016-05-17 10:56:29 -07:00
epriestley
afec01129a Allow blocking reviewers to be added via the web UI
Summary:
Ref T10939. Adds a `blocking(...)` token.

This code is pretty iffy and going to get worse before it gets better, but the fix (T10967 + EditEngine) is going to be a fair chunk of work down the road.

Test Plan: {F1426966}

Reviewers: chad

Reviewed By: chad

Subscribers: scode

Maniphest Tasks: T10939

Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15933
2016-05-17 10:56:12 -07:00
epriestley
bf5437212c When a revision is accepted but has open dependencies, show a note in the list UI
Summary:
Ref T10939. I don't think this is hugely important, but it doesn't clutter things up much and it's nice as a hint.

T4055 was the original request specifically asking for this. It wanted a separate bucket, but I think this use case isn't common/strong enough to justify that.

I would like to improve Differential's "X depends on Y" feature in the long term. We don't tend to use/need it much, but it could easily do a better and more automatic job of supporting review of a group of revisions.

Test Plan: {F1426636}

Reviewers: chad

Reviewed By: chad

Maniphest Tasks: T10939

Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15930
2016-05-16 12:11:52 -07:00
epriestley
c5853b4f48 Put revisions you're a reviewer on which need review and which you've commented on in "Should Review"
Summary: Ref T10939. These poor stragglers got left out in the rain. Didn't catch any issues otherwise.

Test Plan: {F1426604}

Reviewers: chad

Reviewed By: chad

Maniphest Tasks: T10939

Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15929
2016-05-16 11:39:35 -07:00
epriestley
6e9828c743 Fix a dashboard bucketing bug
Summary: Ref T10939. For various historical reasons, revision status is a numeric string. This comparison fails because it's `(string) !== (int)`. Just use `!=` so this will still work if we turn it into a real string in the future.

Test Plan: Tried a more specific test case locally, got better looking results in "Must Review" and "Should Review".

Reviewers: chad

Reviewed By: chad

Maniphest Tasks: T10939

Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15928
2016-05-16 11:07:10 -07:00
epriestley
8a98868bfb Remove "days fresh" / "days stale" indictator in Differential revision list
Summary:
Ref T10939. I'm not //totally// opposed to the existence of this element, but I think it's the kind of thing that would never make it upstream today. I think this should just be a T418 custom sort of thing in the long run, not a mainline upstream feature.

Overall, I think this thing is nearly useless and just adds visual clutter. My dashboard is about 100% red. This also sort of teaches users that it's fine to let revisions sit for a couple of days, which isn't what I'd like the UI to teach. Finally, removing it helps the UI feel a little less cluttered after the visually busy changes in D15926.

Test Plan: Grepped for removed config. Viewed revision list.

Reviewers: chad

Reviewed By: chad

Maniphest Tasks: T10939

Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15927
2016-05-16 10:47:19 -07:00
epriestley
d46378df20 Modernize "Responsible Users" tokenizer and add "exact(user)" token
Summary:
Ref T10939. Fixes T9263. Ref T4144.

First, this resolves users (converting users into all packages and projects they are responsible for) earlier, so bucketing can act on that data correctly. Previously, your own blocking reviews would appear in "Must Review" but your packages/projects' would not. Now, all of them will.

Second, this adds `exact(username)` to mean "just me, not my packages/projects". You can use this along with "Bucket: By Required Action" to create a personal view of "Active Revisions" if you'd like, and ignore all your project/package reviews.

Test Plan: Queried by "me" and "exact(me)", got reasonable looking results.

Reviewers: chad

Reviewed By: chad

Maniphest Tasks: T4144, T9263, T10939

Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15925
2016-05-16 10:46:26 -07:00
epriestley
42d49be47b Change Differential revision buckets to focus on "next required action"
Summary:
Ref T10939. Ref T4144. This splits the existing buckets ("Blocking Others", "Action Required", "Waiting on Others") into 6-7 buckets with a stronger focus on what the next action you need to take is.

See T10939#175423 for some discussion.

Overall, I think some of the root problems here are caused by reviewer laziness and shotgun review workflows (where a ton of people get automatically added to everything, probably unnecessarily), but these buckets haven't been updated since the introduction of blocking reviewers or project/package reviewers and I think splitting the 3 buckets into 6 buckets isn't unreasonable, even though it's kind of a lot of buckets and the root problem here is approximately "I want to ignore a bunch of stuff on my dashboard".

I didn't remove the old bucketing code yet since it's still in use on the default homepage.

This also isn't quite right until I fix the tokenizer to work properly, since it won't bucket project/package reviewers accurately.

Test Plan: {F1395972}

Reviewers: chad

Reviewed By: chad

Maniphest Tasks: T4144, T10939

Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15924
2016-05-16 10:45:20 -07:00
epriestley
eade206625 Introduce search result buckets
Summary:
Ref T10939. Currently, Differential hard-codes some behaviors for the "active" filter. This introduces "buckets" to make this grouping behavior more general/flexible.

The buckets don't actually do any grouping yet, this just gets rid of the `$query === 'active'` stuff so far.

These buckets change the page size to a large value, becuase pagination won't currently work with bucketing.

The problem is that we normally paginate by selecting one more result than we need: so if we're building a page of size 10, we'll select 11 results. This is fast, and if we get 11 back, we know there's a next page with at least one result on it.

With buckets, we can't do this, since our 11 results might come back in these buckets:

  - A, B, C, A, C, C, A, A, B, B, (B)

So we know there are more results, and we know that bucket B has more results, but we have no clue if bucket A and bucket C have more results or not (or if there's anything in bucket D, etc).

We might need to select a thousand more results to get the first (D) or the next (A).

So we could render something like "Some buckets have more results, click here to go to the next page", but users would normally expect to be able to see "This specific bucket, A, has more results.", and we can't do that without a lot more work.

It doesn't really matter for revisions, because almost no one has 1K of them, but this may need to be resolved eventually.

(I have some OK-ish ideas for resolving it but nothing I'm particularly happy with.)

Test Plan: {F1376542}

Reviewers: chad

Reviewed By: chad

Maniphest Tasks: T10939

Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15923
2016-05-16 10:44:42 -07:00
epriestley
3a727c31e2 Modernize DifferentialRevisionSearchEngine
Summary:
Ref T10939. Ref T4144. This moves the revision SearchEngine to modern code so I can add some kind of bucketing layer on top of it.

This seems to have worked pretty cleanly. One thing is that I removed the ability to search for "pending drafts":

  - This was added in D1927 from a bootcamp task, was an indirect solution to a questionable problem, and almost certainly would not meet the bar today.
  - Later, in D3324, we added the icons to the list. I think this is a better solution in general. In particular, it specifically addressed the query being kind of junky.
  - At the time, Differential had a prebuilt "Drafts" filter. This was removed in D6347 with the move to ApplicationSearch, which simplified the large number of prebuilt filters. Although we got a lot of feedback about that, none requested that the drafts filter be restored.

Test Plan: Searched for responsible users, subscribers, orders, projects, repositories.

Reviewers: chad

Reviewed By: chad

Maniphest Tasks: T4144, T10939

Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15921
2016-05-16 10:44:11 -07:00
epriestley
c9365e48d8 Don't trigger "Auto Review" if the author is already an owner; document "Auto Review"
Summary:
Ref T10939. If you already own a package, don't trigger the subscribe/review rules.

Document how these rules work.

Test Plan:
  - Read documentation.
  - Removed reviewers, updated a revision, got autoreviewed.
  - Joined package.
  - Removed reveiwers, updated a revision, no more autoreview.

Reviewers: chad

Reviewed By: chad

Maniphest Tasks: T10939

Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15918
2016-05-13 17:24:33 -07:00
epriestley
92b9fa47d0 Allow Herald to add package reviewers
Summary: Ref T10939. Packages are valid reviewers, so let Herald "Add Reviewers" and "Add Blocking Reviewers" actions add them.

Test Plan:
  - Wrote a rule to add package reviewers.
  - Hit the rule, saw a package reviewer added, viewed transcript.

{F1311731}

{F1311732}

{F1311733}

Reviewers: chad

Reviewed By: chad

Maniphest Tasks: T10939

Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15917
2016-05-13 17:23:07 -07:00
epriestley
332d787dc8 Support "Review Changes" and "Block Changes" settings for Owners package "Auto Review"
Summary:
Ref T10939. Fixes T8887. This enables and implements the "review" and "blocking review" options for packages.

This is a bit copy-pastey from `DifferentialReviewersHeraldAction`, which doesn't feel awesome. I think the right fix is Glorious Infrasturcture, though -- I filed T10967 to track that.

Test Plan:
  - Set package autoreveiw to "Review".
  - Updated, got a reveiwer.
  - Set autoreview to "blocking".
  - Updated, got a blocking reviewer.

{F1311720}

{F1311721}

{F1311722}

Reviewers: chad

Reviewed By: chad

Maniphest Tasks: T8887, T10939

Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15916
2016-05-13 17:22:36 -07:00
epriestley
52ac242eb3 Implement "Auto Review" in packages with a "Subscribe" option
Summary:
Ref T10939. Ref T8887. This moves toward letting packages automatically become reviewers or blocking reviewers of owned code.

This change adds an "Auto Review" option to packages. Because adding reviewers/blocking reviewers is a little tricky, it doesn't actually have these options yet -- just a "subscribe" option. I'll do the reviewer work in the next update.

Test Plan:
Created a revision in a package with "Auto Review: Subscribe to Changes". The package got subscribed.

{F1311677}

{F1311678}

{F1311679}

Reviewers: chad

Reviewed By: chad

Maniphest Tasks: T8887, T10939

Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15915
2016-05-13 17:21:58 -07:00
epriestley
70ddb1c45f Allow packages to be added as revision reviewers via the UI
Summary:
Ref T10939. This lets you add packages as reviewers manually.

"Project Reviewers" now lists both projects and packages. I have renamed this to "Coalition Reviewers" but that's probably horrible and confusing. I'm not sure "Group Reviewers" is much better.

Test Plan:
  - Added a package as a reviewer manually.
  - Joined it, got authority over it.
  - Saw the review on my dashboard.
  - Accepted the revision, got authority extended to the package review.

{F1311652}

{F1311653}

Reviewers: chad

Reviewed By: chad

Maniphest Tasks: T10939

Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15914
2016-05-13 17:20:09 -07:00
epriestley
3ea47d967a Allow monogrammed objects to be parsed from the arc command line in "Reviewers" and similar fields
Summary:
Ref T10939. This allows the CLI to parse reviewers and subscribers like this:

```Reviewers: epriestley, O123 Some Package Name```

The rule goes:

  - If a reviewer or subscriber starts with a monogram (like `X111`), just look that up and ignore everything until the next comma.
  - Otherwise, split it on spaces and look up each part.

This means that these are valid:

```
alincoln htaft
alincoln, htaft
#a #b epriestley
O123 Some Package, epriestley, #b
```

I think the only real downside is that this:

```
O123 Some Package epriestley
```

...ignores the "epriestley" part. However, I don't expect users to be typing package monograms manually -- they just need to be representable by `arc land` and `arc diff --edit` and such. Those flows will always add commas and make the parse unambiguous.

Test Plan:
  - Added test coverage.
  - `amend --show`'d a revision with a package subscriber (this isn't currently possible to produce using the web UI, it came from a future change) and saw `Subscribers: O123 package name, usera, userb`.
  - Updated a revision with a package subscriber.

Reviewers: chad

Reviewed By: chad

Maniphest Tasks: T10939

Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15911
2016-05-13 17:18:35 -07:00
epriestley
44057ad269 Consider packages when calculating Differential authority
Summary:
Ref T10939. This has no effect yet since packages can not actually become reviewers, I'm just inching toward support.

  - When searching for "responsible users", include revisions that need review by packages you have authority over.
  - When calculating review authority, include authority over packages you are a member of (these currently never exist).

Test Plan:
This isn't reachable so I just `var_dump()`'d stuff and looked at the generated queries, which appeared correct/reasonable.

I'll vet this more thoroughly once packages can actually become reviewers.

Reviewers: chad

Reviewed By: chad

Maniphest Tasks: T10939

Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15909
2016-05-13 17:17:50 -07:00
epriestley
bd9bcaa8ff Improve HTML mail rendering of inline patches
Summary: Fixes T9790. This uses a simple renderer, like the inline context renderer, that emphasizes getting a quick glance at small changes and working reasonably on mobile devices.

Test Plan:
  - Set `inline` setting to `9999`.
  - Created a diff.
  - Saw it render reasonably in HTML mail.
  - Also tested text mail to make sure I didn't break that.

{F1310137, size=full}

Reviewers: chad

Reviewed By: chad

Maniphest Tasks: T9790

Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15901
2016-05-12 12:13:40 -07:00
epriestley
cd86bf0174 Remove metamta.differential.unified-comment-context and explain it in ExtraConfigSetupCheck
Summary: Ref T10694. This setting no longer has any effect: we always show a limited amount of context now.

Test Plan: `grep`

Reviewers: chad

Reviewed By: chad

Maniphest Tasks: T10694

Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15886
2016-05-11 06:47:58 -07:00
epriestley
412fc34557 Improve inline mail snippet rendering, possibly fixing Airmail?
Summary:
Ref T10694. General improvements:

  - Remove leading empty lines from context snippets.
  - Remove trailing empty lines from context snippets.
  - If we removed everything, render a note.
  - Try using `style` instead of `<pre>`? My thinking is that maybe Airmail has weird default rules for `<pre>`, since that's the biggest / most obvious thing that's different about this element to me.

Test Plan: Viewed normal comments locally, faked a comment on an empty line in the middle of a lot of other empty lines.

Reviewers: chad

Reviewed By: chad

Maniphest Tasks: T10694

Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15864
2016-05-06 11:58:33 -07:00
epriestley
371051ff37 Minor tweaks to pre/inline style for inline comments in HTML mail
Summary:
Ref T10694.

  - Shift margins/padding around so inlines with multiple paragraphs get reasonable spacing.
  - Add `text-decoration: none` to the "View Inline" link to kill the underline.

Test Plan: {F1265342}

Reviewers: chad

Reviewed By: chad

Maniphest Tasks: T10694

Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15863
2016-05-06 11:05:23 -07:00