Summary: Ref T13623. In D21603, I made the "partial object" this query returns a raw row, which paging keys can no longer be extracted from properly.
Test Plan: Paged notifications to page 2, no longer saw an error.
Maniphest Tasks: T13623
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D21609
Summary:
Ref T13623. The change in D21577 could lead to a case where we try to access stories the user can't see.
Move the story-loading piece to "willFilterPage()" to make our way thorugh this.
Test Plan:
- Made FeedStory return nothing to simulate invisible notifications, loaded page.
- Before: index access fatal.
- After: clean "no notifications".
- Loaded notifications normally, saw normal notifications.
Maniphest Tasks: T13623
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D21603
Summary:
Ref T13623. When paginating notifications, we may currently construct a query which:
- loads from non-unique rows; and
- returns multiple results.
In particular, `chronologicalKey` isn't unique across the whole table (only for a given viewer). We can get away with this because no user-facing view of notifications is truly "every notification for every viewer" today.
One fix would be to implicitly force the paging query to include `withUserPHIDs(viewerPHID)`, but puruse a slightly more general fix:
- Load only unique stories.
- Explictly limit the pagination subquery to one result.
Test Plan:
- Set page size to 1, inserted duplicate notifications of all stories for another user, clicked "Next", got the GROUP BY error.
- Applied the "only load unique stories" part of the change, got a "expected one row" error instead.
- Applied the "limit 1" part of the change, got a second page of notifications.
Maniphest Tasks: T13623
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D21577
Summary: Ref T13577. After the fix in D21453, lint identifies additional static errors in Phabricator; fix them.
Test Plan: Ran `arc lint`; these messages are essentially all very obscure.
Subscribers: hach-que, yelirekim, PHID-OPKG-gm6ozazyms6q6i22gyam
Maniphest Tasks: T13577
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D21457
Summary:
See <https://hackerone.com/reports/850114>.
An attacker with administrator privileges can configure "notification.servers" to connect to internal services, either directly or with chosen parameters by selecting an attacker-controlled service and having it issue a "Location" redirect.
Generally, we allow this attack to occur. The same administrator can use an authentication provider or a VCS repository to perform the same attack, and we can't reasonably harden these workflows without breaking things that users expect to be able to do.
There's no reason this particular variation of the attack needs to be allowable, though, and the current behavior isn't consistent with how other similar things work.
- Hide the "notification.servers" configuration, which also locks it. This is similar to other modern service/server configuration.
- Don't follow redirects on these requests. Aphlict should never issue a "Location" header, so if we encounter one something is misconfigured. Declining to follow this header likely makes the issue easier to debug.
Test Plan:
- Viewed configuration in web UI.
- Configured a server that "Location: ..." redirects, got a followed redirect before and a failure afterward.
{F7365973}
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D21123
Summary:
Depends on D20933. Ref T13362. This reorganizes Config a bit and attempts to simplify it.
Subsections are now in a landing page console and groupings have been removed. We "only" have 75 values you can edit from the web UI nowadays, which is still a lot, but less overwhelming than it was in the past. And the trend is generally downward, as config is removed/simplified or moved into application settings.
This also gets rid of the "gigantic blobs of JSON in the UI".
Test Plan: Browsed all Config sections.
Maniphest Tasks: T13362
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D20934
Summary:
Ref T4900. When a card is edited, we currently emit an update notification for all the projects the task is tagged with. This isn't quite the right set:
- We want to emit notifications for projects the task //was previously// tagged with, so it can be removed from boards it should no longer be part of.
- We want to emit notifications for ancestors of projects the task is or was tagged with, so parent project boards can be updated.
- However, we don't need to emit notifications for projects that don't actually have workboards.
Adjust the notification set to align better to these rules.
Test Plan:
- Removal of Parent Project: Edited a task on board "A > B", removing the "B" project tag. Saw board A update in another window.
- Normal Update: Edited a task title on board X, saw board X update in another window.
- Used `bin/aphlict debug` to inspect the notification set, saw generally sensible-seeming data going over the wire.
Reviewers: amckinley
Maniphest Tasks: T4900
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D20680
Summary: Depends on D20474. Ref T13272. Provide an easy way to rearrange tabs on a tab panel, by moving them left or right from the context menu.
Test Plan: Moved tabs left and right. Tried to move them off the end of the tab list, no luck.
Reviewers: amckinley
Reviewed By: amckinley
Maniphest Tasks: T13272
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D20475
Summary:
Ref T13266. See <https://discourse.phabricator-community.org/t/notification-page-throws-unrecoverable-fatal-error/2651/>.
The "notifications" query currently uses offset paging for no apparent reason (just a legacy issue?), so some of the paging code is only reachable internally.
- Stop it from using offset paging, since modern cursor paging is fine here (and Feed has used cursor paging for a long time).
- Fix the non-offset paging to work like Feed.
Also:
- Remove a couple of stub methods with no callsites after cursor refactoring.
Test Plan:
- Set things up so I had more than 100 notifications and some in the first 100 were policy filtered, to reproduce the issue (I just made `FeedStory` return `NO_ONE` as a visibility policy).
- Applied the patch, notifications now page cleanly.
- Verified that "Next Page" took me to the right place in the result list.
Reviewers: amckinley
Reviewed By: amckinley
Subscribers: hskiba
Maniphest Tasks: T13266
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D20455
Summary: Ref T13250. See D20149. Mostly: clarify semantics. Partly: remove magic "null" behavior.
Test Plan: Poked around, but mostly just inspection since these are pretty much one-for-one.
Reviewers: amckinley
Reviewed By: amckinley
Subscribers: yelirekim
Maniphest Tasks: T13250
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D20154
Summary: Depends on D19864. Ref T13222. See PHI996. This is no longer used by anything, so get rid of it.
Test Plan: Grepped; viewed a feed with these stories in it to make sure nothing crashed/exploded.
Reviewers: amckinley
Reviewed By: amckinley
Maniphest Tasks: T13222
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D19865
Summary:
Depends on D19861. Ref T13222. See PHI996. Fixes T10743. Currently, notifications only work if a story also has a feed rendering.
Separate "visible in feed" and "visible in notifications", and make notifications query only notifications and vice versa.
Then, set the test notification stories to be visible in notifications only, not feed.
This could be refined a bit (there's no way to have the two views render different values today, for example) but since the only actual use case we have right now is test notifications I don't want to go //too// crazy future-proofing it. I could imagine doing some more of this kind of stuff in Conpherence eventually, though, perhaps.
Test Plan: Sent myself test notifications, saw them appear on my profile timeline and in the JS popup, and in my notifications menu, but not in feed.
Reviewers: amckinley
Reviewed By: amckinley
Maniphest Tasks: T13222, T10743
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D19864
Summary:
Depends on D19860. Ref T13222. Ref T10743. See PHI996.
Long ago, there were different types of feed stories. Over time, there was less and less need for this, and nowadays basically everything is a "transaction" feed story. Each story renders differently, but they're fundamentally all about transactions.
The Notification test controller still uses a custom type of feed story to send notifications. Move away from this, and apply a transaction against the user instead. This has the same ultimate effect, but involves less weird custom code from ages long forgotten.
This doesn't fix the actual problem with these things showing up in feed. Currently, stories always use the same rendering for feed and notifications, and there need to be some additional changes to fix this. So no behavioral change yet, just slightly more reasonable code.
Test Plan: Clicked the button and got some test notifications, with Aphlict running.
Reviewers: amckinley
Reviewed By: amckinley
Maniphest Tasks: T13222, T10743
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D19861
Summary:
Ref T13124. Ref T13131. Fixes T8953. See PHI512.
When you receieve a notification about an object and then someone hides that object from you (or deletes it), you get a phantom notification which is very difficult to clear.
For now, test that notifications are visible when you open the menu and clear any that are not.
This could be a little more elegant than it is, but the current behavior is very clearly broken. This unbreaks it, at least.
Test Plan:
- As Alice, configured task stuff to notify me (instead of sending email).
- As Bailey, added Alice as a subscriber to a task, then commented on it.
- As Alice, loaded home and saw a notification count. Didn't click it yet.
- As Bailey, set the task to private.
- As Alice, clicked the notification bell menu icon.
- Before change: no unread notifications, bell menu is semi-stuck in a phantom state which you can't clear.
- After change: bad notifications automatically cleared.
{F5530005}
Reviewers: amckinley
Reviewed By: amckinley
Maniphest Tasks: T13131, T13124, T8953
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D19384
Summary:
Fixes T12979. In D18457, we added a "No Notifications" setting to let users disable the blue and yellow pop-up notifications that alert you when an object has been updated, since some users found them distracting.
However, the change made "do nothing" the default, so all other `JX.Notification` callsites -- which never pass a preference -- were effectively turned off no matter what your setting was set to. This includes the "Read-Only" mode warning (grey), the "High Security" mode warning (purple), the "timezone" warning, and a few others.
Tweak things a little bit so the setting applies to ONLY blue and yellow ("object you're following was updated" / "this object was updated") notifications, not other types of popup notifications.
Test Plan:
- With notifications on in settings, got blue notifications and "Read-only".
- With notifications off in settings, got "Read-only" but no blue notifications.
Reviewers: amckinley
Reviewed By: amckinley
Maniphest Tasks: T12979
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D18600
Summary: This panel just gets super tall at 15 now that date is on it's own line.
Test Plan: Reload panel, count to 10.
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Spies: Korvin
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D18486
Summary: Fixes whatever task is tracking this junk, if one exists. Don't prompt unless there's a security issue.
Test Plan:
- Generated notifications from a test account.
- Clicked "Mark All" from dropdown menu, no prompt.
- Clicked "Mark All" from notifications screen, no prompt.
- Command-Clicked "Mark All" from dropdown menu to open in new window, got normal prompt.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D18483
Summary: Fixes T12792. Expands the Notifications to "web, desktop, both, or none" for real-time notifications in settings.
Test Plan: Test with "test notifications" button, and while logged into two accounts with each of the 4 settings.
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Spies: Korvin
Maniphest Tasks: T12792
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D18457
Summary: Ref T12845. Converts the cluster and project config options to the new stuff; this is mostly just shifting boilerplate around.
Test Plan: Edited, deleted, and mangled these options from the web UI and CLI.
Reviewers: chad, amckinley
Reviewed By: amckinley
Maniphest Tasks: T12845
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D18166
Summary:
Ref T12566. Ref T12563. This fixes three bugs with Aphlict replay stuff:
First, Conphernece would try to repaint the UI even if no thread was open. Only repaint when a thread is open.
Second, although we deduplicate JX.Leader messages, we didn't deduplicate actual notification messages. If you browsed the leader window, then it re-elected itelf as a leader and replayed history, it could rebroadcast notifications and other windows could show doubles. Deduplicate notifications to prevent this.
Third, we always replayed the last 60 seconds of history. When you browsed the leader window, whichever window became the new leader (possibly the one you just browsed) could replay messages from before it had opened, leading to duplicate messages. Particularly, after receiving a message and then browsing you could see that message again. Instead, only replay history as far back as when the window first opened.
Test Plan:
- Clicked "Repaint" with a thread open, saw a repaint. Clicked "Repaint" with Conpherence open but no thread, no repaint and no 404 request to `/update/null/`.
- In browser A, opened three windows. In browser B, sent a notification. In browser A, browsed the leader window away twice in a row. Observed that the window which never became a leader doesn't duplicate notifications.
- In browser A, opened three windows. In browser B, sent a notification. In browser A, browsed the leader window away over and over again. Observed that replay requests issued with appropriate history windows.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T12566, T12563
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D17722
Summary:
Fixes T12564. We already had some code which seems to deal with this properly, it just wasn't getting used.
Assign each application-level notification a unique ID, then ignore messages with duplicate IDs.
Test Plan:
- In browser A, loaded `/T123`.
- In browser B, loaded `/T123`.
- Made a comment as B.
- Saw notification as A.
- Mashed "Replay" a bunch.
- Before patch: piles of duplicate notifications.
- After patch: no duplicates.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T12564
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D17710
Summary: A bit better styling, this adds an indication icon for if you're connected or not (and later, away, etc).
Test Plan: Test in Notifications menu, Conpherence full, Durable Column.
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: Korvin
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D16647
Summary: Adds a connection status message in Conpherence
Test Plan: Check status
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: Korvin
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D16625
Summary:
Fixes T11097. Currently, popup notifications show a useless timestamp with the current time, after D16041 made some things more consistent.
Strip these from the popup bubbles.
Test Plan:
- Saw a popup bubble, no timestamp.
- Viewed main notification list, saw timestamps.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T11097
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D16258
Summary:
Ref T4103. Ref T10078. This puts a user cache in front of notification and message counts.
This reduces the number of queries issued on every page by 4 (2x building the menu, 2x building Quicksand data).
Also fixes some minor issues:
- Daemons could choke on sending mail in the user's translation.
- No-op object updates could fail in the daemons.
- Questionable data access pattern in the file query coming out of the profile file cache.
Test Plan:
- Sent myself notifications. Saw count go up.
- Cleared them by visiting objects and clearing all notifications. Saw count go down.
- Sent myself messages. Saw count go up.
- Cleared them by visiting threads. Saw count go down.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T4103, T10078
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D16041
Summary: Fixes T8846. Ref T4103. I just took the shortest reasonable path here, this panel could use some attention on the next Conpherence iteration.
Test Plan: Turned on/off desktop notifications. Observed corresponding behavior in test notifications.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T4103, T8846
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D16036
Summary:
Ref T6915. This allows multiple notification servers to talk to each other:
- Every server has a list of every other server, including itself.
- Every server generates a unique fingerprint at startup, like "XjeHuPKPBKHUmXkB".
- Every time a server gets a message, it marks it with its personal fingerprint, then sends it to every other server.
- Servers do not retransmit messages that they've already seen (already marked with their fingerprint).
- Servers learn other servers' fingerprints after they send them a message, and stop sending them messages they've already seen.
This is pretty crude, and the first message to a cluster will transmit N^2 times, but N is going to be like 3 or 4 in even the most extreme cases for a very long time.
The fingerprinting stops cycles, and stops servers from sending themselves copies of messages.
We don't need to do anything more sophisticated than this because it's fine if some notifications get lost when a server dies. Clients will reconnect after a short period of time and life will continue.
Test Plan:
- Wrote two server configs.
- Started two servers.
- Told Phabricator about all four services.
- Loaded Chrome and Safari.
- Saw them connect to different servers.
- Sent messages in one, got notifications in the other (magic!).
- Saw the fingerprinting stuff work on the console, no infinite retransmission of messages, etc.
(This pretty much just worked when I ran it the first time so I probably missed something?)
{F1218835}
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T6915
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15711
Summary:
Fixes T10783 (what little of it remains). Ref T10697.
Aphlict currently uses request paths for two different things:
- multi-tenant instancing in the Phacility cluster (each instance gets its own namespace within an Aphlict server);
- some users configure nginx and apache to do proxying or SSL termination based on the path.
Currently, these can collide.
Put a "~" before the instance name to make it unambiguous. At some point we can possibly just use a GET parameter, but I think there was some reason I didn't do that originally and this sequence of changes is disruptive enough already.
Test Plan: Saw local Aphlict unambiguously recognize "local.phacility.com" as instance "local", with a "~"-style URI.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T10697, T10783
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15705
Summary:
Fixes T10697. This finishes bringing the rest of the config up to cluster power levels.
Phabricator is now given an arbitrarily long list of notification servers.
Each Aphlict server is given an arbitrarily long list of ports to run services on.
Users are free to make them meet in the middle by proxying whatever they want to whatever else they want.
This should also accommodate clustering fairly easily in the future.
Also rewrote the status UI and changed a million other things. 🐗
Test Plan:
{F1217864}
{F1217865}
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T10697
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15703
Summary:
Ref T4571. There will be a very long path beyond this, but add a basic read-only mode. You can explicitly enable this to put Phabricator in a sort of "maintenance" mode today if you're swapping databases or something.
In the long term, we'll automatically degrade into this mode if the master database is down.
Test Plan:
- Enabled read-only mode.
- Browsed around.
- Didn't immediately see anything that was totally 100% broken.
Most stuff is 80-90% broken right now. For example:
- Stuff like submitting comments doesn't work, and gives you a confusing, unhelpful error.
- None of the UI really knows that it's read-only. EditEngine stuff should all hide itself and say "you can't add new comments while an install is in read-only mode", for example, but currently does not.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T4571
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15662
Summary: Single callsite, swap to `newPage`
Test Plan: Visit page, see same status message. Also remove device ready flag.
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: Korvin
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15610
Summary: Mostly for consistency, we're not using other forms of icons and this makes all classes that use an icon call it in the same way.
Test Plan: tested uiexamples, lots of other random pages.
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: Korvin
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15125
Summary: Ref T9979. Convert all DestructionEngine behaviors to extensions.
Test Plan:
{F1033244}
Destroyed an object, verifying:
- Herald transcripts were destroyed;
- edges were destroyed;
- flags were destroyed;
- tokens were destroyed;
- transactions were destroyed;
- worker tasks were cancelled.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T9979
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D14832
Summary: Ref T9690. I wanted to do an example of how to do these but it looks like most of them are trivial (no callsites) and the rest are a little tricky (weird interaction with frames, or in Releeph).
Test Plan:
- Used `grep` to look for callsites.
- Hit all applications locally, everything worked.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T9690
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D14385
Summary:
Fixes T9494. This:
- Removes all the random GC.x.y.z config.
- Puts it all in one place that's locked and which you use `bin/garbage set-policy ...` to adjust.
- Makes every TTL-based GC configurable.
- Simplifies the code in the actual GCs.
Test Plan:
- Ran `bin/garbage collect` to collect some garbage, until it stopped collecting.
- Ran `bin/garbage set-policy ...` to shorten policy. Saw change in web UI. Ran `bin/garbage collect` again and saw it collect more garbage.
- Set policy to indefinite and saw it not collect garabge.
- Set policy to default and saw it reflected in web UI / `collect`.
- Ran `bin/phd debug trigger` and saw all GCs fire with reasonable looking queries.
- Read new docs.
{F857928}
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T9494
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D14219
Summary: Updates Notifcations for handleRequest
Test Plan: Test as much as I could, mark all, view, lists.
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: epriestley, Korvin
Maniphest Tasks: T8628
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D13767
Summary:
Fixes T4139. Adds a "Desktop Notifications" panel to settings. For now, we start with "Send Desktop Notifications Too" functionality. We can try to be fancy later and only send desktop notifications if the web app doesn't have focus, etc.
Test Plan:
Made some comments as a test user on a task and got purdy desktop notifications using Chrome. Then did it again with Firefox.
Played around with permissions form with Chrome and got helpful information about what was up. Played around with Firefox and got similar results, except canceling the dialogue didn't invoke my handler code somehow. Oh Firefox!
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: rbalik, tycho.tatitscheff, joshuaspence, epriestley, Korvin
Maniphest Tasks: T4139
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D13219
Summary: Ref T8099. This adds a new class which all search engines return for layout. I thought about this a number of ways, and I think this is the cleanest path. Each Engine can return whatever UI bits they needs, and AppSearch or Dashboard picks and lays the bits out as needed. In the AppSearch case, interfaces like Notifications, Calendar, Legalpad all need more custom layouts. I think this also leaves a resonable path forward for NUX as well. Also, not sure I implemented the class correctly, but assume thats easy to fix?
Test Plan: Review and do a search in each application changed. Grep for all call sites.
Reviewers: btrahan, epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: epriestley, Korvin
Maniphest Tasks: T8099
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D13332
Summary: All classes should extend from some other class. See D13275 for some explanation.
Test Plan: `arc unit`
Reviewers: epriestley, #blessed_reviewers
Reviewed By: epriestley, #blessed_reviewers
Subscribers: epriestley, Korvin
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D13283
Summary: Fixes T8473. Adds garbage collection to the `phabricator_feed.feed_storynotification` table.
Test Plan: Reduced the TTL to a really small value and ran the trigger daemon. Saw feed notifications removed from the database.
Reviewers: epriestley, #blessed_reviewers
Reviewed By: epriestley, #blessed_reviewers
Subscribers: epriestley, Korvin
Maniphest Tasks: T8473
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D13233
Summary: Fixes T8433. Add an index to the `phabricator_feed.feed_storynotification` table. Primarily, this speeds up object destruction.
Test Plan: Ran `./bin/storage upgrade` and saw the migration apply cleanly.
Reviewers: epriestley, #blessed_reviewers
Reviewed By: epriestley, #blessed_reviewers
Subscribers: Korvin, epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T8433
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D13164
Summary:
Ref T4100. Ref T5595.
To support a unified "Projects:" query across all applications, a future diff is going to add a set of "Edge Logic" capabilities to `PolicyAwareQuery` which write the required SELECT, JOIN, WHERE, HAVING and GROUP clauses for you.
With the addition of "Edge Logic", we'll have three systems which may need to build components of query claues: ordering/paging, customfields/applicationsearch, and edge logic.
For most clauses, queries don't currently call into the parent explicitly to get default components. I want to move more query construction logic up the class tree so it can be shared.
For most methods, this isn't a problem, but many subclasses define a `buildWhereClause()`. Make all such definitions protected and consistent.
This causes no behavioral changes.
Test Plan: Ran `arc unit --everything`, which does a pretty through job of verifying this statically.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: yelirekim, hach-que, epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T4100, T5595
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D12453
