Summary:
Ref T4420. This doesn't share all the code it really should, and renders a little odd. Make it more standard.
(Icons aren't handled totally correctly but there's no usability impact and all that code should just get cleaned up.)
Test Plan: Used custom policy typeahead, had a more standard experience.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T4420
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D9902
Summary: Ref T4420. We don't currently pass placeholder text properly, but should.
Test Plan: Saw placeholder text in Herald.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T4420
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D9901
Summary: Fixes T4567. This isn't going to win design awards and we have some leaky CSS, but it works fine.
Test Plan: {F176743}
Reviewers: btrahan, chad
Reviewed By: chad
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T4567
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D9905
Summary:
Ref T5476. Currently, the task edit code assumes it knows what the UI looks like and sends back where on the column an item should be inserted.
This is buggy after adding filters, and relatively complex. Instead, send down the ordering on the whole column and sort it in the UI. This is a bit simpler overall and more general. It makes it easier to further generalize this code for T5476.
Test Plan:
- Edited a task on a board, changing priority. Saw it reorder properly.
- Edited a task on a board in a field of other tasks at the same top-level priority. Saw it refresh without reordering.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T5476
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D9832
Summary: I'm pretty sure that `@group` annotations are useless now... see D9855. Also fixed various other minor issues.
Test Plan: Eye-ball it.
Reviewers: #blessed_reviewers, epriestley, chad
Reviewed By: #blessed_reviewers, epriestley
Subscribers: epriestley, Korvin, hach-que
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D9859
Summary: Various fixes as suggested by JSHint.
Test Plan: Eye-balled it.
Reviewers: #blessed_reviewers, epriestley
Reviewed By: #blessed_reviewers, epriestley
Subscribers: epriestley, Korvin
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D9783
Summary:
Ref T3116. Add a Herald action "Require legal signatures" which requires revision authors to accept legal agreements before their revisions can be accepted.
- Herald will check which documents the author has signed, and trigger a "you have to sign X, Y, Z" for other documents.
- If the author has already signed everything, we don't spam the revision -- basically, this only triggers when signatures are missing.
- The UI will show which documents must be signed and warn that the revision can't be accepted until they're completed.
- Users aren't allowed to "Accept" the revision until documents are cleared.
Fixes T1157. The original install making the request (Hive) no longer uses Phabricator, and this satisfies our requirements.
Test Plan:
- Added a Herald rule.
- Created a revision, saw the rule trigger.
- Viewed as author and non-author, saw field UI (generic for non-author, specific for author), transaction UI, and accept-warning UI.
- Tried to accept revision.
- Signed document, saw UI update. Note that signatures don't currently //push// an update to the revision, but could eventually (like blocking tasks work).
- Accepted revision.
- Created another revision, saw rules not add the document (since it's already signed, this is the "no spam" case).
Reviewers: btrahan, chad
Reviewed By: chad
Subscribers: asherkin, epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T1157, T3116
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D9771
Summary: See D9719.
Test Plan:
- Used hide/show columns.
- Used "add column".
- Filtered board.
{F170133}
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Subscribers: epriestley
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D9726
Summary:
Fixes T5373. Ref T5281. Several changes:
- The `marshallExceptions` thing is useful if JS throws an exception when invoked from Flash, so set it. The resulting exceptions are a little odd (not escaped correctly, e.g.) but way better than nothing.
- Put connection status in the notification menu.
- When the connection fails, try to provide contextual help where we can.
Test Plan: {F169493}
Reviewers: chad, joshuaspence
Reviewed By: joshuaspence
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T5281, T5373
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D9700
Summary:
Ref T5373. The control flow between `aphlict-listener` and `JX.Aphlict` is pretty weird right now, where the listener (which is the highest-level component) has intimate knowledge of how to put the SWF on the page.
Instead:
- Make `JX.Aphlict` a real singleton.
- Instantiate it sooner.
- Have it handle the flash setup handshake.
Test Plan: Loaded page in debug mode, saw normal flow take place.
Reviewers: joshuaspence
Reviewed By: joshuaspence
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T5373
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D9699
Summary:
Ref T5373. This seems to work pretty much correctly.
Also stop popping bubbles and just use the log, since users find the bubbles confusing/not useful and they're not great for developers either.
Future diffs will expose more user-facing stuff.
Test Plan: Added `throw` to AphlictClient.as, got a log in the parent window.
Reviewers: joshuaspence
Reviewed By: joshuaspence
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T5373
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D9698
Summary: As advised by JSHint.
Test Plan: I'm not really sure how to comprehensively test this. It looks okay to me.
Reviewers: chad, epriestley, #blessed_reviewers
Reviewed By: epriestley, #blessed_reviewers
Subscribers: epriestley, Korvin
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D9677
Summary: There are a bunch of unused variables in JavaScript files. These were identified with JSHint.
Test Plan: It's pretty hard to test this thoroughly... on inspection, it seems that everything //should// be okay (unless we are doing weird things with the JavaScript).
Reviewers: chad, #blessed_reviewers, epriestley
Reviewed By: #blessed_reviewers, epriestley
Subscribers: epriestley, Korvin
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D9676
Summary: Replaces Embed hint with where the heck you are hint.
Test Plan: Tested current and previous mock images.
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: epriestley, Korvin
Maniphest Tasks: T5384
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D9658
Summary:
Fixes T5424.
- One concrete issue: drafts were not being cleared properly because `__draft__` was not set on submission. This (mostly) fixes phantom drafts.
- This ajax comment magic feels weird and floaty and generally has problems. For example, if you add subscribers or inlines, all the stuff on the page which represents those won't update automatically. Instead, just reload. Maybe we'll ajax this stuff some day, but it feels like a net negative for now.
- Also remove it from other applications where it's currently used.
- Fix an issue with inline previews.
Test Plan: Made some comments on a mock, everything worked normally like I expected it to.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T5424
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D9649
Summary: Ref T5179. Ref T4045. Ref T832. We can now write non-utf8 hunks into the database, so try to do more reasonable things with them in the UI.
Test Plan: (See screenshots...)
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T832, T4045, T5179
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D9294
Summary:
Minor things
- Fades out comment icon on hover
- Adds hover to inline comment images
- moves mask position to just the image, and not the transparent border
Test Plan: Tested all of these items on various mocks
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: epriestley, Korvin
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D9631
Summary: n/a
Test Plan: Added title and description to 1 of 2 mocks, toggled left and right, saw correct CSS.
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: epriestley, Korvin
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D9580
Summary:
Ref T4986. Instead of requiring you to know engine class names and copy/paste URLs, provide select dropdowns that use SCARY JAVASCRIPT to do magical things.
I think this is mostly reasonable, the only issue is that it's hard to create a panel out of a completely ad-hoc query (you'd have to save it, then create a panel out of the saved query, then remove the saved query). Once we develop T5307 we can do a better job of this.
Test Plan: See screenshots.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T4986
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D9572
Summary:
- When the button is clicked, actually download the file or image.
- Add aural hints for the icon-only buttons.
- Use a "photo" icon for "view raw image", so the "arrows pointing outward" icon can be used for "fullscreen" some day.
Test Plan: Clicked link, got a download.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Subscribers: epriestley
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D9574
Summary: Fixes T5283.
Test Plan: See screenshots.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T5283
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D9549
Summary:
Ref T5359. When users upload non-image file types (PDFs, text files, whatever), Pholio currently chokes in a few places. Make most of these behaviors more reasonable:
- Provide thumbs in the required sizes.
- Predict the thumb size of these files correctly.
- Disable inline comments.
- Make "View Fullsize" and "Download" into buttons. These mostly-work. Download should probaly really download, but CSRF on forms is a bit of a pain right now.
Test Plan: See screenshots.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T5359
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D9548
Summary:
This could probably use some refinement (and, like, explanatory text, and stronger cues about what rows and columns mean) but feels fairly good to me, at least on test data.
I didn't do any scrolling for now since we have to do full height on mobile anyway I think. I did swap it so the newer ones are on top.
Left/right navigate you among current images only, but you can click any thumb to review history.
Removed history view since it's no longer useful.
Some things that would probably help:
- Some kind of header explaining what this is ("Mock History" or something).
- Stronger visual cue that columns are related by being the same image.
- Clearer cues about obsolete/deleted images (e.g., on the stage itself?)
- Maybe general tweaks.
- Maybe a placeholder (like a grey "X") for images which have been deleted.
(I'm planning to add comment counts too, which I think will be pretty useful, but that felt good to put in another diff.)
Test Plan: See screenshots.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Subscribers: epriestley
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D9543
Summary:
Currently, we limit the image size to make sure that the stage has a constant height and the entire image always fits on screen.
In practice, these don't actually seem like desirable qualities. Instead, focus on giving as many pixels as possible to the image.
Test Plan: See screenshots.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Subscribers: epriestley
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D9539
Summary:
- Moves the right-hand gutter under the image.
- Moves size information to the upper right.
- This is transitional, on the way toward something more like the mocks in D9534.
Test Plan: See screenshot.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Subscribers: epriestley
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D9538
Summary: This greatly simplifies inline comments while retaining their functionality. This is probably not where we want to end up, but will let us figure out what we're doing with the stage without worrying about inlines.
Test Plan: See screenshots.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Subscribers: epriestley
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D9537
Summary:
- Hide inline areas on mobile, and when the mouse cursor is not on the stage.
- Show small icon markers instead of areas.
- Yellow icons show draft comments; pink icons show final comments.
Test Plan: {F166544}
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Subscribers: epriestley
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D9536
Summary: Uses common CSS spacing, tweaks some colors, increases viewport size to very limits.
Test Plan:
Test large and small images, various breakpoints. Able to more easily review mocks.
{F166500}
{F166501}
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: epriestley, Korvin
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D9534
Summary:
Ref T4083. This needs some work (mostly in the Conpherence JS itself), but is sort of functional. In particular:
- On thread pages, add the thread as a `pageObject`.
- After updating a thread, send a new "message" event to the server.
- Share a little more event posting code.
- In the browser, use event dispatch to respond to events.
- Add a listener for the new event type.
- Update conpherence threads (this part is really yucky).
Test Plan: With multiple browser windows / browsers open, posted a message to a thread, and saw it update everywhere.
Reviewers: joshuaspence
Reviewed By: joshuaspence
Subscribers: chad, epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T4083
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D9486
Summary: Ref T4324. Ref T5284. This adds server-side support for keeping track of a set of PHIDs that the Aphlict clients have subscribed to. Instead of broadcasting a notification to all clients (after which the clients can poll `/notification/individual` in order to determine whether or not they are interested in the notification), transmit notifications only to clients that have subscribed to a PHID that is relevant to the notification.
Test Plan:
I opened up two clients on the same host (incognito tabs in Chrome). Here is the output from the server:
```
> sudo ./bin/aphlict debug
Starting Aphlict server in foreground...
Launching server:
$ 'nodejs' '/usr/src/phabricator/src/applications/aphlict/management/../../../../support/aphlict/server/aphlict_server.js' --port='22280' --admin='22281' --host='localhost' --user='aphlict'
[Wed Jun 11 2014 19:10:27 GMT+0000 (UTC)] Started Server (PID 4546)
[Wed Jun 11 2014 19:10:36 GMT+0000 (UTC)] <FlashPolicy> Policy Request From ::ffff:192.168.1.1
[Wed Jun 11 2014 19:10:37 GMT+0000 (UTC)] <Listener/1> Connected from ::ffff:192.168.1.1
[Wed Jun 11 2014 19:10:37 GMT+0000 (UTC)] <Listener/1> Received data: {"command":"subscribe","data":["PHID-USER-cb5af6p4oepy5tlgqypi"]}
[Wed Jun 11 2014 19:10:37 GMT+0000 (UTC)] <Listener/1> Subscribed to: ["PHID-USER-cb5af6p4oepy5tlgqypi"]
[Wed Jun 11 2014 19:10:39 GMT+0000 (UTC)] <Listener/1> Received data: {"command":"subscribe","data":["PHID-USER-kfohe3ca5oe6ygykmioq"]}
[Wed Jun 11 2014 19:10:39 GMT+0000 (UTC)] <Listener/1> Subscribed to: ["PHID-USER-kfohe3ca5oe6ygykmioq"]
[Wed Jun 11 2014 19:10:42 GMT+0000 (UTC)] notification: {"key":"6023751084283587681","type":"notification","subscribers":["PHID-USER-cb5af6p4oepy5tlgqypi"]}
[Wed Jun 11 2014 19:10:42 GMT+0000 (UTC)] <Listener/1> Wrote Message
```
I verified (using the "Network" tab in Chrome) that an AJAX request to `/notification/individual/` was only made in the tab belonging to the user that triggered the test notification.
Reviewers: epriestley, #blessed_reviewers
Reviewed By: epriestley, #blessed_reviewers
Subscribers: epriestley, Korvin
Maniphest Tasks: T5284, T4324
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D9458
Summary: Fixes T5271. This is mostly similar to normal tab panel JS, but I think we'll eventually do async rendering and/or saved tabs so it's reasonable to split it out.
Test Plan: Toggled tabs on a tab panel, saw tab selected state change.
Reviewers: btrahan, chad
Reviewed By: chad
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T5271
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D9478
Summary: Since an error is bad and means that some sort of action is required, make Aphlict error notifications persistent (i.e. they won't dismiss until being clicked).
Test Plan: Loaded a page with `notifications.enabled` set to `true` but without the Aphlict server actually running. Noticed that the error message didn't dismiss automatically.
Reviewers: epriestley, #blessed_reviewers
Reviewed By: epriestley, #blessed_reviewers
Subscribers: epriestley, Korvin
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D9423
Summary:
This currently uses a hard-coded relative path, but should not, especially after D9401.
The major effect of this is that updated .swf files might not be served properly, and we were at the whims of the server configuration for caching/versioning behavior.
Test Plan: Enabled debug notifications, saw .swf load through Celerity.
Reviewers: joshuaspence
Reviewed By: joshuaspence
Subscribers: epriestley
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D9421
Summary: Currently, the Aphlict log notifications show for the same duration as normal Aphlict notifications (12 seconds). I find this to be far to long and usually find myself clicking all of the log notifications that I am not interested in.
Test Plan: Loaded a page and saw the debug notifications dismiss after roughly three seconds.
Reviewers: epriestley, #blessed_reviewers
Reviewed By: epriestley, #blessed_reviewers
Subscribers: epriestley, Korvin
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D9409
Summary:
Fixes T5273. Two issues:
- If a JX.Resource callback throws, we keep running it. Instead, make sure it gets cleaned up before raising an exception.
- The countdown timer script doesn't recover gracefully if the node has been removed from the document by the time it runs. Instead, just bail if we can't find the countdown.
Test Plan: Dumped `{Cxyz}` into a preview and got a countdown.
Reviewers: yungsters
Reviewed By: yungsters
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T5273
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D9399
Summary: This was broken in D9380 and caused notifications to stop working.
Test Plan: Saw notifications.
Reviewers: epriestley, #blessed_reviewers
Reviewed By: epriestley, #blessed_reviewers
Subscribers: epriestley, Korvin
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D9395
Summary: Ref T4324. Currently, if the `AphlictMaster` receives dodgy data from the Aphlict server (invalid JSON, for example) then a syntax error will be thrown and the `AphlictMaster` will die. Instead, catch errors and raise a notification.
Test Plan: {F163466}
Reviewers: #blessed_reviewers, epriestley
Reviewed By: #blessed_reviewers, epriestley
Subscribers: epriestley, Korvin
Maniphest Tasks: T4324
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D9380
Summary:
Ref T5179. Currently, all the changeset rendering logic is in the "populate" behavior, and a lot of it comes in via configuration and is hard to get at.
Instead, surface an object which can control it, and which other behaviors can access more easily.
In particular, this allows us to add a "Load/Reload" item to the view options menu, which would previously have been very challenging.
Load/Reload isn't useful on its own, but is a step away from "Show whitespace as...", "Highlight as...", "Show tabtops as...", "View Unified", "View Side-By-Side", etc.
Test Plan:
- Viewed Differential.
- Viewed Diffusion.
- Viewed large changesets, clicked "Load".
- Used "Load" and "Reload" from view options menu.
- Loaded all changes in a large diff, verified "Load" and TOC clicks take precedence over other content loads.
- Played with content stability stuff.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T5179
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D9286
Summary: Currently, debugging (log) messages from the Aphlict client trigger a visible notification in the web UI (when `notification.debug` is enabled). After D9327, the log messages can be quite verbose and seem to "block" legitimate notifications because they are not automatically dismissed.
Test Plan: Enabled `notification.debug` and observed that the debugging notifications expired and closed after a few seconds.
Reviewers: epriestley, #blessed_reviewers
Reviewed By: epriestley, #blessed_reviewers
Subscribers: epriestley, Korvin
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D9339
Summary: Takes a pass at standardizing spacing and colors for lists and tokens.
Test Plan: Tested a lot of lists, policy, timeline, quick create, diffusion.
Reviewers: epriestley
Subscribers: epriestley, Korvin
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D9325
Summary:
Ref T4673.
IMPORTANT: I had to break one thing (see TODO) to get this working. Not sure how you want to deal with that. I might be able to put the element //inside// the workboard, or I could write some JS. But I figured I'd get feedback first.
General areas for improvement:
- It would be nice to give you some feedback that you have a filter applied.
- It would be nice to let you save and quickly select common filters.
- These would probably both be covered by a dropdown menu instead of a button, but that's more JS than I want to sign up for right now.
- Managing custom filters is also a significant amount of extra UI to build.
- Also, maybe these filters should be sticky per-board? Or across all boards? Or have a "make this my default view"? I tend to dislike implicit stickiness.
Test Plan:
Before:
{F157543}
Apply Filter:
{F157544}
Filtered:
{F157545}
Reviewers: chad, btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: qgil, swisspol, epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T4673
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D9211
Summary: To get there, upgrade "headerless" to "headerMode". Add a new removepanel controller. Fixes T5084.
Test Plan: removed some panels to much success
Reviewers: chad, epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: epriestley, Korvin
Maniphest Tasks: T5078, T5084
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D9156
Summary:
Updates policy, headers, typeaheads to FA over policy icons
Need advice - can't seem to place where icons come from on Typeahead? Wrong icons and wrong colors.... it is late
Test Plan:
- grepped for SPRITE_STATUS
- grepped for sprite-status
- grepped for setStatus for headers
- grepped individual icons names
Browsed numerous places, checked new dropdowns, see pudgy people.
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: epriestley, Korvin
Maniphest Tasks: T4739
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D9179
Summary:
Ref T4986. This mostly just makes tab panels a little nicer.
Maybe this will be modal (header = "none", "edit", "view") in a few diffs but we can clean it up then if so.
Test Plan: {F155491}
Reviewers: btrahan, chad
Reviewed By: chad
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T4986
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D9143
Summary:
Ref T4986. Ref T4983. Panels will soon be able to contain other panels, either via Remarkup (`{W1}`) or maybe through new types of meta-panels.
Allow panels to detect that they are being rendered very deeply and/or within themselves.
Test Plan: Faked some errors, got failed panel renders. Since panels can't //really// contain other panels yet, this doesn't really have an impact.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: chad, epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T4983, T4986
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D9140
Summary:
This gets us the ability to specify a "layout mode" and which column a panel should appear in at panel add time. Changing the layout mode from a multi column view to a single column view or vice versa will reset all panels to the left most column.
You can also drag and drop where columns appear via the "arrange" mode.
We also have a new dashboard create flow. Create dashboard -> arrange mode. (As opposed to view mode.) This could all possibly use massaging.
Fixes T4996.
Test Plan:
made a dashboard with panels in multiple columns. verified correct widths for various layout modes
re-arranged collumns like whoa.
Reviewers: chad, epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: epriestley, Korvin
Maniphest Tasks: T4996
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D9031
Summary:
Allows you to quickly search for files within a repository. Roughly:
- We build a big tree of everything and ship it to the client.
- The client implements a bunch of Sublime-ish magic to find paths.
Test Plan: {F154007}
Reviewers: chad, btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley, zeeg
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D9087
Summary:
This code is currently quite complicated because we pull history data inline for SVN files, and via ajax for everything else (SVN dirs, everything in Git and Hg).
Always pull over ajax; batch some of the queries.
Test Plan: {F34860}
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley, vrana, aran
Maniphest Tasks: T2683
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D5255
Summary: Ref T2683. Instead of sending one request for each path's history, send one request for all of it. This permits optimizations which are not currently available to us. It degrades the user experience a tiny bit in theory, but on my machine it's actually way faster already.
Test Plan: Loaded a browse page.
Reviewers: vrana, btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley, aran
Maniphest Tasks: T2683
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D5254
Summary:
Fixes T430. Fixes T4834. Obsoletes D7641. Currently, we do some things less-well than we could:
- We just let the browser queue and prioritize requests, so if you load a revision with 50 changes and then click "Award Token", the action blocks until the changes load in most/all browsers. It would be better to prioritize this action and queue it immediately.
- Similarly, changes tend to load in order, even if the user has clicked to a specific file. When the user expresses a preference for a specific file, we should prioritize it.
- We show a spinning GIF when waiting on requests. This is appropriate for some types of reuqests, but distracting for others.
To fix this:
- Queue all (or, at least, most) requests into a new queue in JX.Router.
- JX.Router handles prioritizing the requests. Principally:
- You can submit a request with a specific priority (500 = general content loading, 1000 = default, 2000 = explicit user action) and JX.Router will get the higher stuff fired off sooner.
- You can name requests and then adjust their prorities later, if the user expresses an interest in specific results.
- Only use the spinner gif for "workflow" requests, which is bascially when the user clicked something and we're waiting on the server. I think it's useful and not-annoying in this case.
- Don't show any status for draft requests.
- For content requests, show a subtle hipster-style top loading bar.
Test Plan:
- Viewed a diff with 93 changes, and clicked award token.
- Prior to this patch, the action took many many seconds to resolve.
- After this patch, it resolves quickly.
- Viewed a diff with 93 changes and saw a pleasant subtle hipster-style loading bar.
- Viewed a diff with 93 changes and typed some draft text. Previews populated fairly quickly and there was no spinner.
- Viewed a diff with 93 changes and clicked something with workflow, saw a spinner after a moment.
- Viewed a diff with 93 changes and clicked a file in the table of contents near the end of the list.
- Prior to this patch, it took a long time to show up.
- After this patch, it loads directly.
Reviewers: chad, btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T430, T4834
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D8979
Summary:
man I sure hate Javascript
I removed the ajax-edit and ajax-remove interactions, becuase they were prohibitively complex to get working given that the entire menu has to change too. Instead, the page just reloads. This works perfectly fine in practice.
If we want to restore these in the future, we should have the server re-render the entire transaction group or something. I think very little is lost here, though.
Test Plan:
- Took all the actions.
- Used existing dropdown menus.
{F150196}
Reviewers: chad, btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D8966
Summary:
See D8966, D8973. Replace PhabricatorDropdownMenu with PHUIXDropdownMenu.
These new menus look weird on mobile because all action lists pick up a bunch of weird styles on mobile and we're now reusing the CSS.
Test Plan:
{F150425}
{F150426}
Reviewers: btrahan, chad
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D8974
Summary:
Dropdown menus are entirely dynamic right now and use custom CSS. Begin rebuilding them to use ActionList CSS.
This introduces PHUIX components which are basically JS copy/pastes of the PHP PHUI components, just implemented in JS.
We have two other dropdowns: policy controls and one in Conpherence. I'll convert those, then implement D8966.
Test Plan: {F150418}
Reviewers: chad, btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D8973
Summary:
Ref T4119. This is ugly for now, but technically works.
The comment area and transaction log don't realy know about each other, so for the moment the linking is a bit manual. Differential/Maniphest are special cases anyway.
Test Plan: {F149992}
Reviewers: chad, btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T4119
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D8957
Summary:
Fixes T4909. Adds a "remove" link next to the edit link, which permanently hides a comment. Addresses two use cases:
- Allowing administrators to clean up spam.
- Allowing users to try to put the genie back in the bottle if they post passwords or sensitive links, etc.
The user who removed the comment is named in the removal text to enforce some level of administrative accountability.
No data is deleted, but there's currently no method to restore these comments. We'll see if we need one.
This is cheating a little bit by storing "removed" as "2" in the isDeleted field. This doesn't seem tooooo bad for now.
Test Plan:
- Removed some of my comments.
- As an administrator, removed other users' comments.
- Failed to view history of a removed comment.
- Failed to edit a removed comment.
- Failed to remove a removed comment.
- Verified feed doesn't show the old comment after comment removal.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: qgil, chad, epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T4909
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D8945
Summary:
Ref T3718. Ref T3644. Ref T3092. Switches from the Releeph UI elements to standard ones. I'll attach some screenshots.
Also fixes CSRF against the request action endpoint.
Test Plan:
- Viewed request details.
- Took actions on a request from detail page.
- Viewed request list.
- Took actions on a request from list page.
- Used keyboard shortcuts to navigate list.
- Used keyboard shortcuts to take actions.
- Simulated errors.
- Viewed on devices.
Reviewers: chad, btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: grp, FacebookPOC, mattlqx, tala, beng, LegNeato, epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T3718, T3092, T3644
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D8771
Summary: ...use the prefab stuff as it does fancier things than we were doing. Only trick then really is to pass username and the map of handle phids => icons to the client so prefab can work nicely. Fixes T4775.
Test Plan: made a herald rule with projects and users. Saw nice icons. Reloaded page and still saw nice icons.
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: epriestley, Korvin
Maniphest Tasks: T4775
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D8749
Summary: ...the key is to move a layer lower and beam down the updated comment. There is a wee bit of Javascript gymnastics going on here. Fixes T4608.
Test Plan: made a comment + resolve. clicked edit and made changes. noted transaction updated correctly and "history" link worked. edited again to a deletion and noted the "this is deleted" looked right and history link still worked
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: epriestley, Korvin, chad
Maniphest Tasks: T4608
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D8702
Summary: Fixes T4641.
Test Plan: Dragged a "normal" task between "high" and "low" tasks and it stayed as "normal". Generally seems correct when playing around.
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: mbishopim3, Beltran-rubo, epriestley, Korvin
Maniphest Tasks: T4641
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D8622
Summary: Ref T1812. Moves most specialized status handling into `ManiphestTaskStatus`. The only real missing case is reports.
Test Plan:
Browsed most of the affected interfaces. Changed task status:
{F132697}
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T1812
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D8579
Summary: Useful in cases where there is an Arcanist Project but not a repository tracked by Phabricator for a particular revision.
Test Plan: Created a new rule to flag Differential revisions with a particular Arcanist project, verified that it applied as expected via the test console to revisions with the project specified and with a different project specified.
Reviewers: #blessed_reviewers, epriestley
Reviewed By: #blessed_reviewers, epriestley
Subscribers: aran, epriestley, Korvin
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D8463
Summary: Ref T2222. Makes the "lint/unit errors" warnings work again.
Test Plan: Viewed some revisions with and without these warnings.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T2222
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D8475
Summary: Fixes T4553, T4407.
Test Plan: created tasks and they showed up in the proper column. edited task priority and they moved about sensically.
Reviewers: chad, epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: Korvin, epriestley, aran
Maniphest Tasks: T4553, T4407
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D8420
Summary:
Fixes T4550 by changing supportsFeed to shouldPublishFeedStory, so things can be more granular like that are with mail. Attempts to fix things generally too, filtering out xactions that have no business in feed, etc.
Also return an updated Task HTML representation on drag and drop moves, etc. This is important so if the priority changes you can see it reflected in the UI.
Test Plan: dragged tasks around. observed no feed stories on subpriority drags. observed feed stories and updated color bars on stories that changed priority
Reviewers: epriestley, chad
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: Korvin, epriestley, aran
Maniphest Tasks: T4550
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D8399
Summary: This wasn't working. Create a little JS handler and server-side support for returning the Task in the "project card" format.
Test Plan: Edited tasks from the board - they worked!
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: Korvin, epriestley, aran, chad
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D8392
Summary:
adds ManiphestTransaction::TYPE_PROJECT_COLUMN and makes it work. Had to clean up the Javascript ever so slightly as it was sending up the string "null" when it should just omit the data in these cases. Ref T4422.
NOTE: this is overall a bit buggy - e.g. move a task Foo from column A to top of column B; refresh; task Foo is at bottom of column B and should be at top of column B - but I plan on additional diff or three to clean this up.
Test Plan: dragged tasks around columns. clicked on those tasks and saw some nice transactions.
Reviewers: epriestley
CC: Korvin, epriestley, aran
Maniphest Tasks: T4422
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D8366
Summary:
A few minor fixes:
- When we build a tag with `"meta" => null`, strip the attribute like we do for all other attributes. Previously, we would actually set the metadata to `null`. This happened with the Conpherence form.
- Just respond to the draft request with an empty (but valid) response, instead of building a dialog.
- `PhabricatorShapedRequest` is confusingly named and I should have caught this in review, but the basic shape of it is:
- You make one object.
- You call `trigger()` when stuff changes (e.g., a keystroke).
- It manages making a small number of requests (e.g., one request after the user stops typing for a moment).
- The way it was being used previously would incorrectly send a request for every keystroke.
I think I'm going to simplify `ShapedRequest` and merge it into some larger queue for T430.
Test Plan: Typed some text, no longer saw a flurry of requests. Reloaded page, still saw draft text.
Reviewers: btrahan, chad
Reviewed By: chad
CC: aran, chad
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D8380
Summary:
Ref T3886. Ref T418. For fields like "Summary" and "Test Plan" where changes can't be summarized in one line, allow CustomField to provide a "(Show Details)" link and render a diff.
Also consolidate some of the existing copy/paste, and simplify this featuer slightly now that we've move to dialogs.
Test Plan:
{F115918}
- Viewed "description"-style field changes in phlux, pholio, legalpad, maniphest, differential, ponder (questions), ponder (answers), and repositories.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T3886, T418
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D8284
Summary: Fixes T3497.
Test Plan: on conpherence 1, typed some stuff. clicked conpherence 2 - observed some stuff gone. clicked conpherence 1 - stuff came back! submitted conpherence 1 and reloaded - stuff did not come back. (Generally played around a bunch like this)
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: Korvin, epriestley, aran
Maniphest Tasks: T3497
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D8266
Summary:
Ref T2222. This restores the "N older comments are hidden." shield to all ApplicationTransactions applications. Roughly the rule this uses is that transactions older than your most recent comment are hidden, under the assumption that you've already read and dealt with them, since you replied afterward. Then we show your last comment to remind/contextualize you, and anything afterward. We also don't hide transactions if we'd only be hiding a handfull, and we never hide the few most recent transactions.
This might need some #design help.
Test Plan:
The tricky part here is the anchor rule, which deals with the case where you follow a link to `T123#4`, but that would normally be hidden. We simulate a click on "show all" if you hit an anchor which is hidden. Here's what it looks like in Maniphest:
{F112891}
Reviewers: btrahan, chad
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: chad, aran
Maniphest Tasks: T2222
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D8229
Summary: form.reset() resets a form to whatever values were present when the form was loaded into the DOM. Instead, grab all the pertinent form bits and set there values to "clear". I don't think there's too much utility in putting this somewhere more general, but it could be something like DOM.clearForm(form) or something. Fixes T3629.
Test Plan:
repro'd original issue
- open legalpad doc (or your favorite application transaction powered app)
- type in a comment but do not submit (you are creating a draft) e.g. "foo"
- reload page and note comment appears e.g. "foo"
- change comment e.g. "foobar"
- submit comment
- BUG - after submission, the comment reverts to the comment at initial page load e.g. "foo"
then after this patch, I can't repro it anymore with these steps - the comment is correctly blank
NOTE: this will need to be tested with more complicated forms.
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: Korvin, epriestley, aran
Maniphest Tasks: T3629
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D8220
Summary: adds a new FIELD and a new VALUE to support this. Slightly dodgy because priorities do not have phids so we have to special case how we handle this in a few spots. Ref T4294.
Test Plan: made a new rule to get cc'd on unbreak now and wishlist tasks. verified got cc'd correctly and not cc'd correctly.
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: Korvin, epriestley, aran
Maniphest Tasks: T4294
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D8156
Summary:
Ref T3623. I'm sure I didn't get the margins / drop shadow quite right, but this looks and works reasonably well:
{F105637}
Test Plan: Clicked stuff to quick create.
Reviewers: chad, btrahan
Reviewed By: chad
CC: chad, aran
Maniphest Tasks: T3623
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D8089
Summary:
Added yformat to ManiphestReportController. Removed [yy] from the js.
Will pull config.yformat or send []. The old way with [yy] never seemed to worked having config.yformat, also would crash if yformat was in with value
Test Plan: Loadup burn up report, hover over a given date. Number of tasks opened should be an int
Reviewers: epriestley, #blessed_reviewers
CC: Korvin, epriestley, aran
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D8080
Summary: Ref T1344. Makes requests to the server, which are received and ignored. Performs appropriate locking/unlocking/enabling/disabling on the client.
Test Plan: Dragged stuff around, saw it enable/disable/send correctly.
Reviewers: chad, btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T1344
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D7943
Summary:
Ref T1344. Makes the UI/UX a little nicer; still no actual backend stuff. This changes:
- When you drop an item onto a different column, the item actually moves.
- Empty columns render with a special CSS class now, but no nodes in the list. This cleans up some JS jankiness. I made the "empty" columns have a light blue background for now. We could put some sort of subtle background image in them instead, or some kind of call to action if it's not redundant with other UI.
Test Plan: {F101208}
Reviewers: chad, btrahan
Reviewed By: chad
CC: chad, aran
Maniphest Tasks: T1344
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D7942
Summary:
Ref T1344. Allows you to drag tasks within a column and between columns, and handles all the multi-column state / targeting / ghosting stuff.
This is a UI-only change; you can't actually do anything meaningful with these yet.
Roughly, I added the idea of a DraggableList existing within a "group" of draggable lists. Normally, that group only has one item, but on boards it has all of the columns. Then I made all of the relevant operations just apply to the whole group of lists.
Test Plan:
- Verified existing funtionality in Maniphest and ApplicationSearch is unaffected, by dragging around tasks to reprioritize them and dragging around search items.
- Dragged tasks between columns on a board view.
{F101196}
Reviewers: chad, btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: chad, aran
Maniphest Tasks: T1344
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D7941
Summary: This implements support for explicitly marking the sequence of build steps. Users can now drag and re-order build steps in plans, and artifact dependencies are re-calculated so that if you move "Run Command" before "Lease Host", the "Run Command" step has it's artifact setting cleared and thus the step becomes invalid.
Test Plan: Re-ordered build steps and observed dependencies being correctly recalculated.
Reviewers: epriestley, #blessed_reviewers
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: Korvin, epriestley, aran
Maniphest Tasks: T1049
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D7715
Summary:
Ref T4122.
- For Diffusion, we need "allow null" (permits selection of "No Credential") for anonymous HTTP repositories.
- For Diffusion, we can make things a little easier to configure by prefilling the username.
Test Plan: Used UIExample form. These featuers are used in a future revision.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T4122
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D7624
Summary: Fixes T4006.
Test Plan: clicked "select all" and dragged around tasks. Noted the task remained selected as I re-ordered, thus keeping hte count accurate. Verified when I hit "batch edit" the right tasks showed up.
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: Korvin, epriestley, aran
Maniphest Tasks: T4006
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D7566
Summary:
Depends on D7500.
This seemed like a pretty good idea once I thought of it. Instead of having some custom triggering logic instead Harbormaster, I figured it best to leverage all of Herald's power so that users can create rules to apply builds to commits and differential revisions. This gives the added advantage that they can trigger off builds for particular types of revisions and commits, which seems like it could be really useful (e.g. run extra tests against revisions that touch sensitive areas of the code).
Test Plan: Ran the usual daemons + the Harbormaster daemon. Pushed a commit to the repository and saw both the buildable and build get created when the commit worked picked it up. Submitted a diff and saw both the buildable and build get created when the Herald rules were evaluated for the diff.
Reviewers: epriestley, #blessed_reviewers
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: Korvin, epriestley, aran, hwinkel
Maniphest Tasks: T1049
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D7501
Summary: Makes it easy to choose distinctive icons for projects.
Test Plan:
{F71018}
{F71020}
{F71019}
{F71021}
Reviewers: btrahan, chad
Reviewed By: chad
CC: chad, aran
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D7333
Summary: Ref T603. When a user selects "Custom", we pop open the rules dialog and let them create a new rule or edit the existing rule.
Test Plan: Set some objects to have custom policies.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T603
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D7300
Summary: Ref T3958. Adds a provider for Mozilla's Persona auth.
Test Plan:
- Created a Persona provider.
- Registered a new account with Persona.
- Logged in with Persona.
- Linked an account with Persona.
- Dissolved an account link with Persona.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T3958
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D7313
Summary: Currently, when a dialog is submitted the Workflow itself emits an event but no DOM event is emitted. The workflow event is fine for handlers which only use JS, but there's currently no way for a handler to act more like a normal form handler. This event gives normal form handlers a way to capture Workflow submits and muck around with form contents, etc.
Test Plan: In a future diff, edited policies via a Workflow dialog.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D7295
Summary: Ref T603. Make this a little easier to use by highlighting the current value.
Test Plan: See screenshot.
Reviewers: chad, btrahan
Reviewed By: chad
CC: chad, aran
Maniphest Tasks: T603
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D7289
Summary: Ref T603. After thinking about this for a bit I can't really come up with anything better than what Facebook does, so I'm going to implement something similar for choosing custom policies. To start with, swap this over to a JS-driven dropdown.
Test Plan: See screenshot.
Reviewers: chad, btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: chad, aran
Maniphest Tasks: T603
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D7285
Summary:
Ref T603. This isn't remotely usable yet, but I wanted to get any feedback before I build it out anymore.
I think this is a reasonable interface for defining custom policies? It's basically similar to Herald, although it's a bit simpler.
I imagine users will rarely interact with this, but this will service the high end of policy complexity (and allow the definition of things like "is member of LDAP group" or whatever).
Test Plan: See screenshots.
Reviewers: btrahan, chad
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran, asherkin
Maniphest Tasks: T603
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D7217
Summary:
Ref T1279. Although I think this is a bad idea in general (we once supported it, removed it, and seemed better off for it) users expect it to exist and want it to be available. Give them enough rope to shoot themselves in the foot.
I will probably write some lengthy treatise on how you shouldn't use this rule later.
Implementation is straightforward because Differential previously supported this rule.
This rule can also be used to add project reviewers.
Test Plan: Made some "add reviewers" rules, created revisions, saw reviewers trigger.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T1279
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D7235
