Summary:
Fixes T10234. This is a more thorough fix.
Root issue is that some time around D13589, we started hitting an object cache for `loadCustomInlineRules()`, but didn't adjust the code to account for that.
So if a page created multiple similar engines, we'd return the same `$rule` object for multiple engines, call `setEngine()` on it with different engines, and then possibly try to render using an already-expired engine the second time through.
Instead, create a separate `$rule` object for each separate `$engine`.
Test Plan:
Repro is something like this:
- Create a custominlinerule which uses an engine.
- Purge the remarkup cache.
- Load a page which uses the rule in two engines (e.g., in a revision description, and also in an inline comment).
- Before change: second one could fatal. After change: clean load.
Reviewers: thoughtpolice, chad
Reviewed By: thoughtpolice, chad
Subscribers: thoughtpolice, eadler
Maniphest Tasks: T10234
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15535
Summary:
Ref T10537.
- Let nuance items render custom curtain panels.
- Add a custom panel linking to the imported task, if one exists.
- Actually extract comments properly.
Test Plan:
Unit tests, plus:
{F1193800}
{F1193801}
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T10537
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15537
Summary: Ref T10677, Awarding/revoking badge should create a feed story on homepage with badge handle recipient handles
Test Plan: Award/revoke badge, open Feed, should see story with badge link and recipient links.
Reviewers: epriestley, #blessed_reviewers
Reviewed By: epriestley, #blessed_reviewers
Subscribers: Korvin
Maniphest Tasks: T10677
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15534
Summary: Ref T10677, awarding/revoking a badge should create timeline entries with titles that are more clear (excludes homepage feed stories)
Test Plan: Award/revoke a badge to single or multiple users. See timeline entries that reflect those actions.
Reviewers: epriestley, #blessed_reviewers
Reviewed By: epriestley, #blessed_reviewers
Subscribers: Korvin
Maniphest Tasks: T10677
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15533
Summary: Cleans up EditEngine, adds new layout to EditEngine and descendents
Test Plan: Test creating a new form, reordering, marking and unmarking defaults. View new forms.
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: Korvin
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15531
Summary: Adds headers, new layout to edit panels on Almanac.
Test Plan: Pull up each edit panel in sandbox, save form.
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: Korvin
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15527
Summary: Ref T8996, Convert badge recipients from Edges to actual BadgeAward objects
Test Plan: Create badge, award it to recipient. Make sure adding/removing recipients works. (Still need to migrate exisiting recipients to new table and need to create activity feed blurbs)
Reviewers: epriestley, #blessed_reviewers
Reviewed By: epriestley, #blessed_reviewers
Subscribers: chad, Korvin
Maniphest Tasks: T8996
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15014
Summary:
Fixes T10302. I think we had fixed-width dialog containers in the past (?) but they all handle their own centering now.
This was causing them to be slightly off-center as a result, and creating the 7px issue in T10302.
Test Plan:
- Viewed a wide dialog (task edit).
- Viewed a narrow dialog (notification dismissal confirmation).
- Viewed dialogs on wide/narrow screens.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T10302
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15529
Summary:
Fixes T10385. Two issues:
- `$show_blame` and `$show_color` were improperly swapped.
- Code to hide these columns got dropped somewhere, probably in my recent-ish rewrite.
Test Plan:
- Showed/hid blame.
- Showed/hid colors.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T10385
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15528
Summary:
Ref T10537. For Nuance, I want to introduce new sources (like "GitHub" or "GitHub via Nuance" or something) but this needs to modularize eventually.
Split ContentSource apart so applications can add new content sources.
Test Plan:
This change has huge surface area, so I'll hold it until post-release. I think it's fairly safe (and if it does break anything, the breaks should be fatals, not anything subtle or difficult to fix), there's just no reason not to hold it for a few hours.
- Viewed new module page.
- Grepped for all removed functions/constants.
- Viewed some transactions.
- Hovered over timestamps to get content source details.
- Added a comment via Conduit.
- Added a comment via web.
- Ran `bin/storage upgrade --namespace XXXXX --no-quickstart -f` to re-run all historic migrations.
- Generated some objects with `bin/lipsum`.
- Ran a bulk job on some tasks.
- Ran unit tests.
{F1190182}
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T10537
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15521
Summary: Updates the Harbormaster UI to match the new two column everywhere else.
Test Plan: Did best I could, tested builds, plans, steps, buildables. Unable to test lint/unit locally, I need to set that up. Kick the tires for me pls. :3
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: Korvin
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15523
Summary: Ref T10537. Show when an object is bridged to something external.
Test Plan: {F1190099}
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T10537
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15520
Summary:
Fixes T10665. See that task for discussion.
Because `$head_map` is not properly re-initialized for each ref we check, pushes which affect multiple branches (say, "A" and "B") can have information bleed from the first branch check to the second branch.
To trigger a problem behavior, you can push one commit which updates an existing branch, plus one commit which creates a new branch. If they process in the right order, the `$head_map` from the updated branch will bleed into the `$head_map` for the new branch and trigger an incorrect head split detection.
Test Plan:
- Pushed a set of changes which updated `branch-a` and created `branch-b`.
- Before change: improper detection of split heads.
- After change: clean push.
- Pushed a set of changes which split the head of `branch-d`.
- Correct detection of split heads.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T10665
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15522
Summary: Ref T10538. This makes us render better human-readable descriptions of more GitHub event types.
Test Plan: Ran unit tests.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T10538
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15516
Summary: I know this is ultimately pointless but feel better about pushing back on users when there is no possible way they could be acting in good faith.
Test Plan: Read documents.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15518
Summary: Ref T10538. Very sloppy, but starting to sort of work. This sort of gets a piece of framework into a reasonable spot, next couple of diffs are going to be "extract comment text" and "show stuff in the UI" sorts of things.
Test Plan: {F1186726}
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T10538
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15511
Summary: This URI is currently a little whack.
Test Plan:
- With MFA, clicked "Edit Subscription" on a subscription.
- Clicked "Cancel".
- Before: Sent to `/phortune/phortune/edit/...`, a 404.
- After: Properly returned to subscription detail page.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15514
Summary: Moves everything I could find in Phortune to new UI layouts.
Test Plan: Tested every page I could get two, unclear how to test subscriptions.
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: Korvin
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15513
Summary:
Ref T10537. Generally, when users interact with Nuance items we'll dump a command into a queue and apply it in the background. This avoids race conditions with multiple users interacting with an item, which Nuance is more subject to than other applications because it has an import/external component.
The "sync" command doesn't actually do anything yet.
Test Plan: {F1186365}
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Subscribers: Luke081515.2
Maniphest Tasks: T10537
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15506
Summary: Ref T10538. This extracts and renders URIs for GitHub events so we can link to the original thing on GitHub.
Test Plan: {F1186332}
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T10538
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15505
Summary:
Ref T10537. This allows item types to expose item actions. Eventually these actions might be things like "promote to task", "tweet reply", "ban user forever", etc.
For now, provide a simple action which shows a raw item in a dialog.
Test Plan: {F1185573}
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Subscribers: Luke081515.2
Maniphest Tasks: T10537
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15504
Summary:
Ref T10537. These are objects which are bound to some external object, like a Maniphest task which is a representation of a GitHub issue.
This doesn't do much yet and may change, but my thinking is:
- I'm putting these on-object instead of on edges because I think we want to actively change the UI for them (e.g., clearly call out that the object is bridged) but don't want every page to need to do extra queries in the common case where zero bridged objects exist anywhere in the system.
- I'm making these one-to-one, more or less: an issue can't be bridged to a bunch of tasks, nor can a bunch of tasks be bridged to a single issue. Pretty sure this makes sense? I can't come up with any reasonable, realistic cases where you want a single GitHub issue to publish to multiple different tasks in Maniphest.
- Technically, one type of each bridgable object could be bridged, but I expect this to never actually occur. Hopefully.
Test Plan: Ran storage upgrade, loaded some pages.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Subscribers: Luke081515.2
Maniphest Tasks: T10537
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15502
Summary: This is failing locally for me, set to getViewer and pull up cart.
Test Plan: View cart with a description.
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: Korvin
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15509
Summary: Ref T9456. This makes everything work, except that CircleCI doesn't fetch tags which are not ancestors of branch heads.
Test Plan: Ran passing builds through CircleCI.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Subscribers: dpaola2, JustinTulloss
Maniphest Tasks: T9456
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D14288
Summary: Ref T9456. Some rough edges and we can't complete the build yet since I haven't written a webhook, but this mostly seems to be working.
Test Plan:
- Ran this build on some stuff.
- Ran a normal HTTP step build to make sure I didn't break that.
{F880301}
{F880302}
{F880303}
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Subscribers: JustinTulloss, joshma
Maniphest Tasks: T9456
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D14286
Summary: Ref T9456. This is just a convenience type for things like API tokens, to make it harder for users to make mistakes and keep SSH keys out of the dropdown for "choose your API token".
Test Plan: {F879820}
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Subscribers: joshuaspence
Maniphest Tasks: T9456
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D14284
Summary: Fixes T10648. This was goofed and always did a meaningless no-op slice -- I mucked it up while doing the disabled project stuff elsewhere.
Test Plan:
- Tagged something with 5 projects.
- Saw the list sliced to 4 (the limit) with "...".
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T10648
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15508
Summary:
Fixes T10646. When you load the page or click "New Condition" or "New Action", we try to add a condition and action with some default values.
Currently, the logic just sets everything to `null` or `'default'`. This technically works in Safari, but is less successful in Chrome. (I think Safari prevents you from picking an invalid value.)
Instead of relying on the browser to pick the right value, set the correct value explicitly.
Test Plan:
- Created a new rule in Chrome, Safari.
- Added fields and conditions in Chrome, Safari.
- Edited existing rules in Chrome, Safari.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T10646
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15507
Summary: Updates Spaces to new two column layout
Test Plan: Create a space, edit a space
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: Korvin
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15503
Summary: Fixes T10234. This usage is unusual, out of date, and has some bad interactions with engines and custom rules.
Test Plan:
- Added `CustomInlineCodeRule` from P1129 as an extension rule.
- Put a custom `<code> ... </code>` block in a Maniphest task description.
- Saw fatal as described in task; applied change; saw rule work properly.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T10234
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15501
Summary:
D9087 adds a nice typeahead but breaks the existing regex
search by quoting the pattern. Ideally, this change won't break the
typeahead, which as far as I can tell doesn't use the `pattern`
argument.
Test Plan:
Not yet.
RFC as to whether this change makes sense, will fix my local setup and resend if so.
Reviewers: epriestley, #blessed_reviewers
Reviewed By: epriestley, #blessed_reviewers
Subscribers: Korvin
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15500
Summary: Ref T7789. Implement proper detection for read-only requests. Previously, we assumed every request was read/write and required lots of permissions, but we don't need "Can Push" permission if you're only cloning/fetching/pulling.
Test Plan:
- Set push policy to "no one".
- Fetched, got clean data out of LFS.
- Tried to push, got useful error.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T7789
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15499
Summary: Fixes T10625.
Test Plan: Faked this locallly and it looked OK, I'll check the mail in production. :3333
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T10625
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15497
Summary:
- Fix spacing on InfoView inside collasped boxes
- Fix spacing on stacked PropertyLists in TwoColumn
- Fix spacing on Readmes on Tablets
- Fix unset variable on importing commits
Test Plan: Review each of the above cases.
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: Korvin
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15496
Summary: Ref T7789. This isn't the most perfect UI imaginable, but it's similar to what GitHub does and seems reasonable.
Test Plan:
{F1180271}
{F1180272}
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T7789
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15494
Summary: Ref T7789. Make sure these get cleaned up when a repository is destroyed.
Test Plan:
- Created a new repository.
- Pushed some LFS data to it.
- Used `bin/remove destroy` to nuke it.
- Verified the LFS stuff was cleaned up and the underlying files were destroyed (`SELECT * FROM repository_gitlfsref`, etc).
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T7789
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15493
Summary:
Ref T7789. Ref T10604. This implements the `upload` action, which streams file data into Files.
This makes Git LFS actually work, at least roughly.
Test Plan:
- Tracked files in an LFS repository.
- Pushed LFS data (`git lfs track '*.png'; git add something.png; git commit -m ...; git push`).
- Pulled LFS data (`git checkout master^; rm -rf .git/lfs; git checkout master; open something.png`).
- Verified LFS refs show up in the gitlfsref table.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T7789, T10604
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15492
