Summary:
Depends on D9806. This implements the build simulator, which is used to calculate the order of build steps in the plan editor. This includes a migration script to convert existing plans from sequential based to dependency based, and then drops the sequence column.
Because build plans are now dependency based, the grippable and re-order behaviour has been removed.
Test Plan: Tested the migration, saw the dependencies appear correctly.
Reviewers: epriestley, #blessed_reviewers
Reviewed By: epriestley, #blessed_reviewers
Subscribers: epriestley, Korvin
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D9847
Summary: Ref T4896. Depends on D10055. This uses core rendering stuff for audit comments, and fixes all the wonkiness with inlines so we can actually land the migration.
Test Plan: Viewed, previewed and edited various types of comments in Diffusion.
Reviewers: chad, btrahan, joshuaspence
Reviewed By: joshuaspence
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T4896
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10056
Summary:
Ref T4896. Depends on D10052. This is the major/scary migration, but not really so bad. It is substantially similar to D8210, but less complex because there are fewer actions here.
This moves `PhabricatorAuditComment` storage to `PhabricatorAuditTransaction`, then reads `PhabricatorAuditComment`s as a proxy around the new objects.
Test Plan:
- Before migrating, browsed around. Nothing appeared broken.
- Migrated cleanly.
- Viewed old transactions (inlines, comments, accept/reject/etc, add auditors, add ccs, implicit CCs).
- Added all of those comment types.
- Edited a draft.
- Deleted a draft.
- Spot checked the database for sanity.
Reviewers: btrahan, joshuaspence
Reviewed By: joshuaspence
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T4896
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10055
Summary: Fixes T5695. A Conduit "method does not exist" exception is somewhat expected... there is no need to `phlog` the exception.
Test Plan: Called a non-existent Conduit method. Saw no exceptions in the error logs.
Reviewers: #blessed_reviewers, epriestley
Reviewed By: #blessed_reviewers, epriestley
Subscribers: epriestley, Korvin
Maniphest Tasks: T5695
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10042
Summary:
Ref T4896. This is substantially identical to the process which Differential followed, and mostly copied from the original Differential migration and the Differential proxy object.
Basically, we move all the data over but the application can't tell, and the same APIs do reads and writes to the new table.
Test Plan:
- Browsed UI before migrating, everything looked fine (but no inlines).
- Ran migration.
- Verified draft and published comments survived migration.
- Added a draft.
- Previewed draft.
- Submitted draft.
- Viewed standalone with drafts and published comments.
- Sanity checked data in database, didn't see anything unusual.
Reviewers: btrahan, joshuaspence
Reviewed By: joshuaspence
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T4896
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10018
Summary:
Ref T4896. This adds the new storage, without any code changes.
This storage is substantially identical to the Differential storage, except that `changesetID` has been replaced by `pathID`.
I've retained the properties intended to be used to implement T1460. They might not be quite right, but at least we'll be able to make any fixes consistently to both applications. For now, these fields are empty and ignored.
Test Plan: Ran `./bin/storage upgrade`. Nothing calls this code yet.
Reviewers: btrahan, joshuaspence
Reviewed By: joshuaspence
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T4896
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10017
Summary: Ref T5655. Rename `PhabricatorPHIDType` subclasses for clarity (see discussion in D9839). I'm not too keen on some of the resulting class names, so feel free to suggest alternatives.
Test Plan: Ran unit tests.
Reviewers: epriestley, #blessed_reviewers
Reviewed By: epriestley, #blessed_reviewers
Subscribers: epriestley, Korvin, hach-que
Maniphest Tasks: T5655
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D9986
Summary:
Ref T2787. Carts need a status so we can tell if they've been purchased. Also kind of get WePay working as a one-time provider, and let charges not have a methodPHID (they won't for one-time providers).
All the status stuff is still super crazy rough and you can do things like start a checkout, add a bunch of stuff to your cart, complete the checkout, and have Phabricator think you paid for all the stuff you added. But this is fine for now since you can't actually edit carts, and also none of this is at all usable anyway. I'll refine some of the workflows in future diffs, for now I'm just getting things hooked up and technically working.
Test Plan:
- Purcahsed a cart and got a sort of status/done screen instead of a "your money is gone" exception.
- Went through the WePay flow and got a successful test checkout.
Reviewers: btrahan, chad
Reviewed By: chad
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T2787
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10003
Summary: Ref T2787. Makes charges a real object, allows providers to apply them. We are now (just barely) capable of stealing users' money.
Test Plan: {F179584}
Reviewers: btrahan, chad
Reviewed By: chad
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T2787
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10002
Summary:
Ref T2787. Make carts and purchases real objects, with storage, that kind-of work.
Roughly, the idea here is that applications create "purchases" (like "1 large t-shirt") and add them to "carts" (a user can have a lot of different carts at the same time), then hand things off to Phortune to deal with actualy charging a card. Roughly this works like Paypal or other similar systems do, except Phortune is the thing the user gets handed off to.
This doesn't do anything interesting/useful yet.
Also fix some bugs and update some UI.
Test Plan: Added a product to a cart, saw it in cart screen.
Reviewers: btrahan, chad
Reviewed By: chad
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T2787
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10001
Summary: Ref T5655. Some discussion in D9839. Generally speaking, `Phabricator{$name}Application` is clearer than `PhabricatorApplication{$name}`.
Test Plan:
# Pinned and uninstalled some applications.
# Applied patch and performed migrations.
# Verified that the pinned applications were still pinned and that the uninstalled applications were still uninstalled.
# Performed a sanity check on the database contents.
Reviewers: btrahan, epriestley, #blessed_reviewers
Reviewed By: epriestley, #blessed_reviewers
Subscribers: hach-que, epriestley, Korvin
Maniphest Tasks: T5655
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D9982
Summary: Ref T5655. It is superfluous to include "base" in the name of an abstract base class. Furthermore, it is not done consistently within the code base.
Test Plan: Ran `arc unit`.
Reviewers: epriestley, #blessed_reviewers
Reviewed By: epriestley, #blessed_reviewers
Subscribers: epriestley, Korvin
Maniphest Tasks: T5655
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D9989
Summary: Ref T5655. The `PhabricatorDestructibleInterface` interface is misspelled as `PhabricatorDestructableInterface`. Fix the spelling mistake.
Test Plan: `grep`. Seeing as this interface is fairly recent, I don't expect that this would cause any widespread breakages.
Reviewers: epriestley, #blessed_reviewers
Reviewed By: epriestley, #blessed_reviewers
Subscribers: epriestley, Korvin
Maniphest Tasks: T5655
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D9988
Summary: Fixes T5659. When building a token after a user selection, we currently use the `value` as the token text, but sometimes that's an internal name which doesn't make much sense to users. For projects, it is now "sluga slugb Proper Display Name". If available, use `displayName` instead.
Test Plan: Typed some projects into a tokenizer, got display names only.
Reviewers: chad, joshuaspence
Reviewed By: joshuaspence
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T5659
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D9996
Summary: Ref T4420. This one is users plus "upforgrabs". I renamed that to "none" and gave it a special visual style to make it more discoverable. Future diffs will improve this.
Test Plan:
- Used it in global search.
- Used it in batch editor.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T4420
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D9891
Summary: Ref T4420. Bring the global search up to date.
Test Plan: Typed various things into global search.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T4420
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D9889
Summary: Ref T4420. Call this "auditor" since that's what it is.
Test Plan:
- Edited auditors in auditor search.
- Edited auditors in "add auditors" in Diffusion.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T4420
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D9888
Summary: Ref T4420. These are used for some stuff like "reviewer".
Test Plan:
- Edited "reviewers" in differential edit.
- Edited "reviewers" in differential search.
- Edited "reviewers" in Differential "add reviewers..." action on detail page.
- Edited a "reviewers" field in a herald rule.
- Edited "owner" in owners search.
- Edited "primary owner", "owners" on owners edit.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T4420
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D9887
Summary:
Ref T5245. We'll still display the old ones, but write real edge transactions now -- not TYPE_PROJECTS transactions.
Some code remains to show the existing transactions. The next diff will modernize the old transactions so we can remove this code.
Test Plan:
- Previewed a project-editing comment.
- Submitted a project-editing comment.
- Edited a task's projects.
- Batch edited a task's projects.
Reviewers: joshuaspence, chad, btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T5245
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D9852
Summary: Ref T5245. Updates the project/object edge to use a modern class definition. Moves further toward real edges.
Test Plan: Added projects to some objects, viewed transactions in transaction record.
Reviewers: chad, btrahan, joshuaspence
Reviewed By: joshuaspence
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T5245
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D9849
Summary: Ref T5245. With work elsewhere (notably, D9839) we can remove this TODO and use real transactions.
Test Plan: Pushed a `closes Txxx` commit and got a close + transaction.
Reviewers: chad, btrahan, joshuaspence
Reviewed By: joshuaspence
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T5245
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D9848
Summary:
Ref T5245. These were a bad idea.
We no longer need actors for edge edits either, so remove those. Generally, edges have fit into the policy model as pure/low-level infrastructure, and they do not have any policy or capability information in and of themselves.
Test Plan: `grep`
Reviewers: chad, btrahan, joshuaspence
Reviewed By: joshuaspence
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T5245
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D9840
Summary:
Ref T5245. See some discussion in D9838.
When we attach object A to object B, we'd like to write transactions on both sides but only write the actual edges once.
To do this, allow edge types to `shouldWriteInverseTransactions()`. When an edge type opts into this, have editors apply the inverse transactions before writing the edge. These inverse transactions don't actually apply effects, they just show up in the transaction log.
Test Plan: Attached and detached revisions from tasks, saw transactions appear on both sides of the operation.
Reviewers: chad, btrahan, joshuaspence
Reviewed By: btrahan, joshuaspence
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T5245
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D9839
Summary:
Ref T5245. A very long time ago I had this terrible idea that we'd let objects react to edges being added and insert transactions in response.
This turned out to be a clearly bad idea very quickly, for like 15 different reasons. A big issue is that it inverts the responsibilities of editors. It's also just clumsy and messy.
We now have `PhabricatorApplicationTransactionInterface` instead, which mostly provides a cleaner way to deal with this.
Implement `PhabricatorApplicationTransactionInterface`, implicitly moving all the attach actions (task/task, task/revision, task/commit, task/mock) to proper edge transactions.
The cost of this is that the inverse edges don't write transactions -- if you attach an object to another object, only the object you were acting on posts a transaction record. This is sort of buggy anyway already. I'll fix this in the next diff.
Test Plan: Attached tasks, revisions and mocks to a task, then detached them.
Reviewers: chad, btrahan, joshuaspence
Reviewed By: joshuaspence
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T5245
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D9838
Summary:
Ref T5245. I want to add a new capability to edge types, which is a good opportunity to move away from `PhabricatorEdgeConfig`, which isn't modular.
This is basically the same as the modularization of PHID types, which has worked well. Add `PhabricatorEdgeType` and provide an adaption layer for the existing code.
This has no runtime changes, except the fixed edge constant.
Test Plan: Ran `var_dump(PhabricatorEdgeType::getAllTypes())` and got reasonable looking output.
Reviewers: chad, btrahan, joshuaspence
Reviewed By: joshuaspence
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T5245
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D9837
Summary: Fixes T5651. Sometime we'll send an object to the notification server for `subscribers`, which it will choke on. Use `array_values()` to make sure we're sending an array.
Test Plan: With `(object)` instead, got a consistent error ("no .filter method on object"). With `array_values()`, no error.
Reviewers: joshuaspence
Reviewed By: joshuaspence
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T5651
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D9963
Summary:
I think this pretty much does what you would expect?
The "active" item is always at the top of the stack.
Test Plan: Called `phrequent.tracking` and got reasonable results.
Reviewers: hach-que
Reviewed By: hach-que
Subscribers: epriestley
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D9939
Summary: These have been moved into libphutil.
Test Plan: Browsed Phabricator, didn't see a crash.
Reviewers: #blessed_reviewers, epriestley
Reviewed By: #blessed_reviewers, epriestley
Subscribers: epriestley, Korvin
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D9907
Summary: Fixes T4567. This isn't going to win design awards and we have some leaky CSS, but it works fine.
Test Plan: {F176743}
Reviewers: btrahan, chad
Reviewed By: chad
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T4567
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D9905
Summary:
This adds methods to start and stop tracking any arbitrary PHID in phrequent. Currently, this uses copy-pasted code from PhrequentTrackController. I had to do this because the code to start/stop was not abstracted into a common class.
Once the code to start/stop working is extracted into a re-usable class, the conduit API can use this as well.
Test Plan: I called the functions with a PHID of a task and ensured that the fields in the phrequent database table was being updated correctly.
Reviewers: skyronic, #blessed_reviewers, epriestley
Reviewed By: #blessed_reviewers, epriestley
Subscribers: maxhodak, erik.fercak, aran, epriestley, Korvin
Maniphest Tasks: T3569, T3970
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D7326
Summary: Ref T4420. Update "projects" source.
Test Plan:
- Edited projects on a Differential revision.
- Edited projects on a commit.
- Edited projects on a repository.
- Edited projects in feed search.
- Edited projects in a Herald rule field.
- Edited projects in a Herald rule action.
- Edited projects in Maniphest batch editor.
- Edited projects on Maniphest task.
- Edited projects in "Associate Projects..." action in Maniphest.
- Edited projects on Maniphest search in "all projects", "any project" and "not projects" fields.
- Edited projects on a Paste.
- Edited projects on a Pholio mock.
- Edited projects on a custom policy rule.
- Edited projects on a Ponder question.
- Edited projects on a Diffusion search query.
- Edited projects on a global search query.
- Edited projects on a slowvote.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T4420
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D9884
Summary: Ref T4420. Make this modern.
Test Plan:
- Used typeahead in remarkup comment area to select macro "derpdog".
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T4420
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D9875
Summary:
Ref T4420.
- Allow tokenizers to accept either a `Datasource` object (new style) or a URI (old style).
- Read URI and placeholder text from object, if available.
- Swap the "repositories" datasource (which seemed like the simplest one) over to the new stuff.
- Tweak/update the repo tokens a little bit.
Test Plan:
- Used tokenizer in Herald, Differential (search), Differential (edit), Push Logs.
- Grepped for other callsites.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T4420
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D9874
Summary:
Ref T5532. Allow document managers to add exemptions, which act like signatures but are tracked a little differently.
The primary use case for us is users who sign a corporate CLA and need a user-level exemption if they don't want to sign an individual CLA.
Test Plan: See screenshots.
Reviewers: btrahan, chad
Reviewed By: chad
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T5532
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D9795
Summary:
This was significantly easier than expected. Here's an example of what an extension class might look like:
```
<?php
final class AddRiskReviewHeraldCustomAction extends HeraldCustomAction {
public function appliesToAdapter(HeraldAdapter $adapter) {
return $adapter instanceof HeraldDifferentialRevisionAdapter;
}
public function appliesToRuleType($rule_type) {
return $rule_type == HeraldRuleTypeConfig::RULE_TYPE_GLOBAL ||
$rule_type == HeraldRuleTypeConfig::RULE_TYPE_OBJECT;
}
public function getActionKey() {
return 'custom:add-risk';
}
public function getActionName() {
return 'Add risk rating (JSON)';
}
public function getActionType() {
return HeraldAdapter::VALUE_TEXT;
}
public function applyEffect(
HeraldAdapter $adapter,
$object,
HeraldEffect $effect) {
$key = "phragile:risk-rating";
// Read existing value.
$field_list = PhabricatorCustomField::getObjectFields(
$object,
PhabricatorCustomField::ROLE_VIEW);
$field_list->readFieldsFromStorage($object);
$field_list = mpull($field_list->getFields(), null, 'getFieldKey');
$field = $field_list[$key];
$field->setObject($object);
$field->setViewer(PhabricatorUser::getOmnipotentUser());
$risk = $field->getValue();
$old_risk = $risk; // PHP copies arrays by default!
// Add new value to array.
$herald_args = phutil_json_decode($effect->getTarget());
$risk[$herald_args['key']] = array(
'value' => $herald_args['value'],
'reason' => $herald_args['reason']);
$risk_key = $herald_args['key'];
// Set new value.
$adapter->queueTransaction(
id(new DifferentialTransaction())
->setTransactionType(PhabricatorTransactions::TYPE_CUSTOMFIELD)
->setMetadataValue('customfield:key', $key)
->setOldValue($old_risk)
->setNewValue($risk));
return new HeraldApplyTranscript(
$effect,
true,
pht(
'Modifying automatic risk ratings (key: %s)!',
$risk_key));
}
}
```
Test Plan: Created a custom action for differential revisions, set up a Herald rule to match and trigger the custom action, did 'arc diff' and saw the action trigger in the transcripts.
Reviewers: epriestley, #blessed_reviewers
Reviewed By: epriestley, #blessed_reviewers
Subscribers: locutus, edutibau, ite-klass, epriestley, Korvin
Maniphest Tasks: T4884
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D8784
Summary: Ref T5471. Adds an archived state for panels. Archived panels don't show up in the default query view or in the "Add Existing Panel" workflow.
Test Plan:
- Archived a panel.
- Activated a panel.
- Viewed / searched for archived/active panels.
- Popped "Add Existing Panel" dropdown and saw it omit archived panels.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T5471
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D9779
Summary: Ref T3116. Installs might reasonably want to restrict creation of these documents to actual lawyers or something.
Test Plan: Adjusted policy, tried to create document, set it back, created a document.
Reviewers: btrahan, chad
Reviewed By: chad
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T3116
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D9778
Summary:
Ref T3116. Add a Herald action "Require legal signatures" which requires revision authors to accept legal agreements before their revisions can be accepted.
- Herald will check which documents the author has signed, and trigger a "you have to sign X, Y, Z" for other documents.
- If the author has already signed everything, we don't spam the revision -- basically, this only triggers when signatures are missing.
- The UI will show which documents must be signed and warn that the revision can't be accepted until they're completed.
- Users aren't allowed to "Accept" the revision until documents are cleared.
Fixes T1157. The original install making the request (Hive) no longer uses Phabricator, and this satisfies our requirements.
Test Plan:
- Added a Herald rule.
- Created a revision, saw the rule trigger.
- Viewed as author and non-author, saw field UI (generic for non-author, specific for author), transaction UI, and accept-warning UI.
- Tried to accept revision.
- Signed document, saw UI update. Note that signatures don't currently //push// an update to the revision, but could eventually (like blocking tasks work).
- Accepted revision.
- Created another revision, saw rules not add the document (since it's already signed, this is the "no spam" case).
Reviewers: btrahan, chad
Reviewed By: chad
Subscribers: asherkin, epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T1157, T3116
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D9771
Summary: Ref T3116. Support permanent destruction of legal document objects.
Test Plan: Ran `bin/remove destroy L1`, saw it clean up the document body, signatures, transactions and edges.
Reviewers: btrahan, chad
Reviewed By: chad
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T3116
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D9775
Summary:
Ref T3116. Currently, document signatures are just in a big list that you can't search through.
- Make it easier to check if a specific user has signed.
- Restrict this UI to users who have edit permission on the document (roughly, you need to be a document manager to see the full signature list).
(It's currently possible to generate a Dashboard panel using this query, but it will just throw an exception. I'm going to leave it like that for now, we might reasonably expose some "view signatures across doucments" UI later so someone can quickly check if a user has signed 5 documents or something.)
Test Plan: {F171576}
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T3116
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D9765
