Summary:
When users submit an audit, send email to relevant parties informing them.
Allow email to be replied to. Just basic support so far; no "!raise" stuff and
no threading with the Herald commit notification.
Test Plan: Made comments, got email. Replied to email, got comments.
Reviewers: btrahan, jungejason
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran, epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T904
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D1698
Summary:
If a user comments on a commit but they don't currently have any audits they're
authoritative on, create a new one.
This makes it easier to handle other things more consistently, like figuring out
the overall audit status of a commit and who should get emails.
Test Plan: Made comments on commits I had authority on and did not have
authority on.
Reviewers: btrahan, jungejason
Reviewed By: jungejason
CC: aran, epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T904
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D1697
Summary: Add audit information to the commit search index.
Test Plan: Updated a commit, searched for terms in its comments, got hits.
Reviewers: btrahan, jungejason
Reviewed By: jungejason
CC: aran, epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T904
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D1696
Summary: When a user posts an action in the audit tool, publish it to feed.
Test Plan: Made some comments, saw them show up in feed.
Reviewers: btrahan, jungejason
Reviewed By: jungejason
CC: aran, epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T904
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D1695
Summary: When a user has pending audits, show them on the homepage.
Test Plan: Looked at my homepage with and without pending audits.
Reviewers: btrahan, jungejason
Reviewed By: jungejason
CC: aran, epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T904
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D1692
Summary:
Allows you to write a commit rule that triggers an audit by a user (personal
rules) or a project (global rules).
Mostly this is trying to make auditing more lightweight and accessible in
environments where setting up Owners packages doesn't make sense.
For instance, Disqus wants a rule like "trigger an audit for everything that
didn't have a Differential revision". While not necessarily scalable, this is a
perfectly reasonable rule for a small company, but a lot of work to implement
with Owners (and you'll get a lot of collateral damage if you don't make every
committer a project owner).
Instead, they can create a project called 'Unreviewed Commits' and write a rule
like:
- When: Differential revision does not exist
- Action: Trigger an Audit for project: "Unreviewed Commits"
Then whoever cares can join that project and they'll see those audits in their
queue, and when they approve/raise on commits their actions will affect the
project audit.
Similarly, if I want to look at all commits that match some other rule (say,
XSS) but only want to do it like once a month, I can just set up an audit rule
and go through the queue when I feel like it.
NOTE: This abuses the 'packagePHID' field to also store user and project PHIDs.
Through the magic of handles, this (apparently) works fine for now; I'll do a
big schema patch soon but have several other edits I want to make at the same
time.
Also:
- Adds an "active" fiew for /audit/, eventually this will be like the
Differential "active" view (stuff that is relevant to you right now).
- On commits, highlight triggered audits you are responsible for.
Test Plan: Added personal and global audit triggers to Herald, reparsed some
commits with --herald, got audits. Browsed all audit interfaces to make sure
nothing exploded. Viewed a commit where I was responsible for only some audits.
Performed audits and made sure the triggers I am supposed to be responsible for
updated properly.
Reviewers: btrahan, jungejason
Reviewed By: jungejason
CC: aran, epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T904
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D1690
Summary: just changed the regex to only look at the beginning of the string
Test Plan: works with: s PhabricatorDAO, rP, r,
rPda892bde7c6e9c8f08572fde2d55c934f26dbb86
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: ddfisher, aran, epriestley
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D1703
Summary:
Current approach has several problems:
- if there is no link in the cell then it still shows a link cursor
- if there is a link then it is clickable only on the text
Test Plan:
Display file in Differential, hover over cell with link.
Repeat for Paste.
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: aran, epriestley
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D1701
Summary:
I added multiline highlighting with the syntax:
http://site/path/to/file$from-to
NOTE: you can reverse the from and to
Test Plan: Open a file in diffusion and attempt to highlight multiple lines
Reviewers: epriestley
CC: aran, epriestley
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D1693
Summary:
D1631 updated the url for related commits, but missed the link here. This
rev updates the link in the owners tool list.
Task ID: #
Blame Rev:
Test Plan:
clicked the link, and it worked
Revert Plan:
Tags:
Reviewers: epriestley, jungejason
Reviewed By: jungejason
CC: aran, epriestley
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D1691
Summary:
This is intended to supplant the existing "audit edit" interface. I've changed
them to both drive down the same write pathway, but the UIs are still different.
I'll fully merge them in a future diff.
Add a comment box (like Maniphest and Differential) to Diffusion. When users
make comments, their comments appear on the commit. Any audits triggers they are
responsible for are updated to reflect actions they take, as well.
Currently, audits can only be triggered by packages, but I intend to allow them
to be triggered by users and projects (via herald rules) in an upcoming diff.
Thus some of the language like "projects, users or packages" when the code is
clearly dealing only with "packagePHID".
Test Plan: Made audit updates via commit interface and via existing edit
interface. Verified both interfaces updated correctly, and that audit
responsibility rules were applied properly.
Reviewers: btrahan, jungejason
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran, epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T904
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D1688
Summary:
beyond the title, this diff tweaks the test console to have a bit more
functionality. also makes a small change to CSS for AphrontFormControlMarkup,
which IMO fixes a display issue on
https://secure.phabricator.com/settings/page/profile/ where the Profile URI is
all up in the air and whatnot
I think this is missing pagination. I am getting tired of the size though and
will add later. See T905.
Test Plan:
viewed, updated and deleted client authorizations. viewed, created,
updated and deleted clients
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: aran, epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T849, T850, T848
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D1683
Summary: We already allow you to create comments, but we don't show them on the
commit page. After style / view unification this is easy; show comments on the
commit page.
Test Plan: Made comments on a commit using the audit too, saw them show up in
Diffusion.
Reviewers: btrahan, jungejason
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran, epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T904
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D1687
Summary:
I want to add comments to commits, and they should obviously share code with the
nearly-identical comments in Maniphest and Differential. Unify code/style as
much as possible.
This program made possible by a generous grant from D1513.
Test Plan:
- Looked at a bunch of different Differential and Maniphest comments; they
appeared to render identically to how they looked before.
- Tested some edge cases like anchors and "show details" on description edits
in Maniphest.
Reviewers: btrahan, jungejason
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran, epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T904
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D1686
Summary:
Currently, audits are only accessible through the Owners tool. Start moving them
to their own first-class tool in preparation for broader audit integration.
- Lay some infrastructure groundwork (e.g. AuditQuery).
- Build a basic /audit/ view.
- Show audits on the commit page in Diffusion.
This has some code duplication with stuff we've already got, but I'll merge
everything together as we move forward on this.
Test Plan: Looked at /audit/ and a commit.
Reviewers: btrahan, jungejason
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran, epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T904
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D1685
Summary:
First stab at a batch editor for Maniphest. Basically, you can select a group of
tasks and then import them into the "batch" interface, where you can edit all of
them at once.
High level goal is to make it easier for users in PM/filer/support/QA roles to
deal with large numbers of tasks quickly.
This implementation has a few major limitations:
- The only available actions are "add projects" and "remove projects".
- There is no review / undo / log stuff.
- All the changes are applied in-process, which may not scale terribly well.
However, the immediate need is just around projects and this seemed like a
reasonable place to draw the line for a minimal useful version of the tool.
Test Plan: Used batch editor to add and remove projects from groups of tasks.
Reviewers: btrahan, yairlivne
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran, epriestley, sandra
Maniphest Tasks: T441
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D1680
Summary:
The mailing list page in MetaMTA only showed the first 100
sorted by ID, so it made it seem like lists were missing. Changed it to
do paging and short by name, so it has some user-understandable order.
Test Plan:
- Go to /mail/lists/
- Step through pager, confirm ordering.
Reviewers: nh, epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: aran, epriestley
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D1670
Summary:
When a comments add reviewers or CCs, we just dump that sort of nastily into the
body. Put it in the header like Maniphest instead.
Also, record the diff associated with "update" actions and link to it (T871).
Test Plan: {F8546} {F8547}
Reviewers: btrahan, davidreuss
Reviewed By: davidreuss
CC: aran, epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T871
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D1659
Summary:
DifferentialRevisionListView requires setFields to be called before
calling getRequiredHandlePHIDs; this adds that call for DiffusionController
Test Plan:
loaded diffusion and saw the "Pending Differential Revisions" section
populated, and no errors in the darkconsole
Reviewers: epriestley, btrahan, jungejason
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: aran, epriestley
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D1665
for scope
Summary:
this patch makes the access token response "complete" relative to spec by
returning when it expires AND that the token_type is in fact 'Bearer'.
This patch also lays the groundwork for scope by fixing the underlying data
model and adding the first scope checks for "offline_access" relative to expires
and the "whoami" method. Further, conduit is augmented to open up individual
methods for access via OAuth generally to enable "whoami" access. There's also
a tidy little scope class to keep track of all the various scopes we plan to
have as well as strings for display (T849 - work undone)
Somewhat of a hack but Conduit methods by default have SCOPE_NOT_ACCESSIBLE. We
then don't even bother with the OAuth stuff within conduit if we're not supposed
to be accessing the method via Conduit. Felt relatively clean to me in terms
of additional code complexity, etc.
Next up ends up being T848 (scope in OAuth) and T849 (let user's authorize
clients for specific scopes which kinds of needs T850). There's also a bunch of
work that needs to be done to return the appropriate, well-formatted error
codes. All in due time...!
Test Plan:
verified that an access_token with no scope doesn't let me see
anything anymore. :( verified that access_tokens made awhile ago expire. :(
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: aran, epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T888, T848
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D1657
Summary:
I haven't actually been using this as much as I thought, and am more interested
in the full view than the per-project view.
Let's try moving it off /home/ and then maybe adding some filtering options at
some point.
Test Plan: Looked at "all" and "my projects" in feed. Looked at home page.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran, epriestley
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D1658
Summary:
Show some statistics, like number of revisions, number of
revisions per week, lines per revision, etc. for phrivolous amusement.
Test Plan:
- Went to /differential/stats/revisions/
Numbers seem right
- Clicked 'Accepted'
Again
- Changed to another user with long history
Load time was not too long though delay noticeable
- Clicked 'Requested changes to'
User was preserved, looks good
Reviewers: epriestley, btrahan
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: aran, epriestley
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D1643
create new tasks
Summary: see title
Test Plan: Tested jump nav and found the correct urls were being loaded. Old
functionality was not effected.
Reviewers: epriestley, btrahan
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: ddfisher, allenjohnashton, kpark517, aran, epriestley
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D1642
Summary: This makes the oauth server a bunch more useful.
Test Plan:
- used /oauth/phabricator/diagnose/ and it actually passed!
- played around with conduit via hacking URL to include access_token on a logged
out browser
- linked my account to itself by going to /settings/page/phabricator/, clicking
"link" account, then cutting and pasting the pertinent ?code=X into
/oauth/phabricator/login/.
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: aran, epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T852
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D1644
Summary:
Build the revision list table out of custom fields instead of hard-coding it, so
installs can add all sorts of zany things to it.
NOTE: You may need to implement sortFieldsForRevisionList() if you have a custom
DifferentialFieldSelector, or some fields might show up out of order.
This implementation will preserve the expected behavior:
public function sortFieldsForRevisionList(array $fields) {
$default = new DifferentialDefaultFieldSelector();
return $default->sortFieldsForRevisionList($fields);
}
Test Plan:
- Loaded differential revision list, identical to old list.
- Profiled page to verify the cost increase isn't significant (it's quite
small).
Reviewers: jungejason, btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran, btrahan, davidreuss, epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T773, T729
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D1388
Summary:
adds a Phabricator OAuth server, which has three big commands:
- auth - allows $user to authorize a given client or application. if $user has already authorized, it hands an authoization code back to $redirect_uri
- token - given a valid authorization code, this command returns an authorization token
- whoami - Conduit.whoami, all nice and purdy relative to the oauth server.
Also has a "test" handler, which I used to create some test data. T850 will
delete this as it adds the ability to create this data in the Phabricator
product.
This diff also adds the corresponding client in Phabricator for the Phabricator
OAuth Server. (Note that clients are known as "providers" in the Phabricator
codebase but client makes more sense relative to the server nomenclature)
Also, related to make this work well
- clean up the diagnostics page by variabilizing the provider-specific
information and extending the provider classes as appropriate.
- augment Conduit.whoami for more full-featured OAuth support, at least where
the Phabricator client is concerned
What's missing here... See T844, T848, T849, T850, and T852.
Test Plan:
- created a dummy client via the test handler. setup development.conf to have
have proper variables for this dummy client. went through authorization and
de-authorization flows
- viewed the diagnostics page for all known oauth providers and saw
provider-specific debugging information
Reviewers: epriestley
CC: aran, epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T44, T797
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D1595
Summary:
A few similar requests have come in across several tools and use cases that I
think this does a reasonable job of resolving.
We currently send one email for each update an object receives, but these aren't
always appreciated:
- Asana does post-commit review via Differential, so the "committed" mails are
useless.
- Quora wants to make project category edits to bugs without spamming people
attached to them.
- Some users in general are very sensitive to email volumes, and this gives us
a good way to reduce the volumes without incurring the complexity of
delayed-send-batching.
The technical mechanism is basically:
- Mail may optionally have "mail tags", which indicate content in the mail
(e.g., "maniphest-priority, maniphest-cc, maniphest-comment" for a mail which
contains a priority change, a CC change, and a comment).
- If a mail has tags, remove any recipients who have opted out of all the
tags.
- Some tags can't be opted out of via the UI, so this ensures that important
email is still delivered (e.g., cc + assign + comment is always delivered
because you can't opt out of "assign" or "comment").
Test Plan:
- Disabled all mail tags in the web UI.
- Used test console to send myself mail with an opt-outable tag, it was
immediately dropped.
- Used test console to send myself mail with an opt-outable tag and a custom
tag, it was delivered.
- Made Differential updates affecting CCs with and without comments, got
appropriate delivery.
- Made Maniphest updates affecting project, priority and CCs with and without
comments, got appropriate delivery.
- Verified mail headers in all cases.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran, epriestley, moskov
Maniphest Tasks: T616, T855
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D1635
Summary:
We don't use maniphest or phriction in our install, so the links/references to
them in tactical command and jump nav can be confusing for users. This hides
these elements if they aren't enabled.
Test Plan: loaded the front page of phabricator in my sandbox, saw they went
away
Reviewers: epriestley, btrahan, jungejason
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: aran, epriestley
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D1636
Summary:
This gets added in D1595 (which hasn't landed yet), but was referred to in
D1632 (already committed). This unbreaks master for me.
Test Plan: I no longer get an error trying to load
PhabricatorOAuthProviderPhabricator
Reviewers: btrahan, epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: jungejason, aran, epriestley
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D1633
Summary:
This is pretty simple and unpolished, but it's getting pretty big and it seems
like a reasonable starting point.
- Log chat in various "channels".
- Conduit record and query methods.
- IRCBot integration for IRC logging
Major TODO:
- Web UI is really unpolished and has no search, paging, anchor-linking, etc.
Basically all presentation stuff, though.
- I think the bot should have a map of channels to log with channel aliases?
- The "channels" should probably be in a separate table.
- The "authors" should probably be correlated to Phabricator accounts somehow,
where possible.
Test Plan: Used phabotlocal to log #phabricator.
Reviewers: kdeggelman, btrahan, Koolvin
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran, epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T837
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D1625
Summary:
add support for searching by package owner for Related Commits
and commits that Need Attention.
Test Plan:
verified that
- searching by package still works when there is or there is no commits
found
- searching by package owner works when there is or there is no commits
found
Reviewers: epriestley, nh
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: aran, epriestley, prithvi, dihde14, Girish
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D1631
Summary:
Getting ready to support searching for the related commits by
package owner (D1631):
- Add 'relative' option to the Nav Filter
- Refactor Owners page
Test Plan: - owners page still renders with the filter displayed correctly.
Reviewers: epriestley, nh
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: aran, epriestley
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D1630
Summary:
- Restore quick methods for getting to common features (upload file, create
task, etc.)
- Provide a flexible cli-like navigation element similar to stuff used at
Facebook (bunny1 / lolbunny).
Test Plan: Used jump nav and nav buttons.
Reviewers: btrahan, fratrik
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran, epriestley
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D1619
Summary:
Pretty straightforward; see title. Kind of gross but I have a bunch
more iterations in mind here (like filtering). Paging this is a little tricky
since we can't easily use AphrontPagerView, as it relies on OFFSET, and I think
that's sort of sketchy to use here for UX reasons (query performance and view
consistency as feed updates).
Test Plan: Looked at feed, paged through feed.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran, epriestley
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D1616
Summary: The effect of this is just to order tasks by (priority, modified)
instead of (modified), i.e. in the same default order as Maniphest, so the top
10 tasks here are the top 10 tasks in your assigned list.
Test Plan: Looked at "Assigned Tasks" on the homepage.
Reviewers: fratrik, btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran, epriestley
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D1621
triage tasks
Summary: The "with projects ... " query boils down to "all triage tasks" when
you don't belong to any projects. Just render the "no needs triage in projects
you are a member of" element unconditionally in this case.
Test Plan: Looked at homepage as a user with no project memberships but some
triage-requiring tasks before and after this change. Prior to this change, all
triage tasks show; afterwards, none.
Reviewers: fratrik, btrahan
Reviewed By: fratrik
CC: aran, epriestley
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D1620
Summary:
Provide a phid.query method that returns the same information as phid.info,
but allows querying for multiple phids at once.
Test Plan: Called the method from the web conduit console.
Reviewers: btrahan, epriestley, jungejason
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: aran, epriestley
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D1617
before displaying it
Summary:
@alok reported a vulnerability where Flash will run carefully-crafted plain text
files.
When the user requests a raw file, cache it into Files if it isn't already
there. Then redirect them to Files. This solves the problem by executing the
SWF/TXT with CDN-domain permissions, not content-domain permissions, provided
the install is correctly configured. (Followup diff coming to make this more
universally true.)
NOTE: We'll still show raw data in Diffusion. The barrier to XSS here is much
higher (you need commit access) but I'll do something similar there. We aren't
vulnerable in Paste, since we already use Files.
Test Plan: Clicked "View Old File", "View New File" in an alt-domain
configuration, got redirected to a cookie-free domain before being delivered the
response.
Reviewers: btrahan, alok
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran, epriestley
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D1607
Summary: Add a "Search for ... in (document group)" thing that picks the current
scope based on the current application.
Test Plan: Conducted searches in several browsers.
Reviewers: btrahan, skrul
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran, epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T858
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D1610
Summary: The `file` binary doesn't exist everywhere, use the more flexible
wrapper introduce in D1609.
Test Plan: Uploaded a file via drag-and-drop, it got MIME'd correctly.
Reviewers: btrahan, davidreuss, Koolvin
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran, epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T869
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D1615
required
Summary: Make these things like 1/4th the size if they aren't actionable.
Test Plan: Loaded home page with actionable, unactionable panels.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran, epriestley
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D1613
Summary: It makes perfect sense to add more reviewers while requesting review.
Test Plan:
Request review. Verify that Add Reviewers field shows and works.
Add some reviewer. Verify that comment preview works.
Submit. Verify that reviewers are saved and displayed.
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: aran, epriestley
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D1473
