1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://we.phorge.it/source/phorge.git synced 2024-11-25 16:22:43 +01:00
Commit graph

15 commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
James Rhodes
270c8d27ab Implement "Wait for Previous Builds" build step
Summary: This adds a build step which will block a build from continuing if there are previous builds of the build plan still running.

Test Plan: Configured a build plan with a wait of 60 seconds and a "wait for previous builds", then started a build.  While that was still building, reconfigured the plan to have a wait time of 3 seconds, started it, and saw it move into the "Waiting" status.  When the 60 second build finished, both builds passed.

Reviewers: epriestley, #blessed_reviewers

Reviewed By: epriestley

CC: Korvin, epriestley, aran

Maniphest Tasks: T1049

Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D7745
2013-12-10 11:02:34 +11:00
James Rhodes
79d153b85d Implement explicit build step ordering in Harbormaster
Summary: This implements support for explicitly marking the sequence of build steps.  Users can now drag and re-order build steps in plans, and artifact dependencies are re-calculated so that if you move "Run Command" before "Lease Host", the "Run Command" step has it's artifact setting cleared and thus the step becomes invalid.

Test Plan: Re-ordered build steps and observed dependencies being correctly recalculated.

Reviewers: epriestley, #blessed_reviewers

Reviewed By: epriestley

CC: Korvin, epriestley, aran

Maniphest Tasks: T1049

Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D7715
2013-12-06 14:12:15 +11:00
James Rhodes
a8b27130cb Make "Edit Build Plan" more resiliant so old build configurations can be deleted
Summary: Currently the "Edit Build Plan" page crashes if there are any build steps with invalid implementations (because the implementation class has been removed or renamed).  This updates the Edit Build Plan page so that steps with invalid implementations can be deleted.

Test Plan: Looked at a build plan with invalid configurations and deleted it's steps.

Reviewers: epriestley, #blessed_reviewers

Reviewed By: epriestley

CC: Korvin, epriestley, aran

Maniphest Tasks: T4111, T1049

Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D7708
2013-12-05 14:20:40 +11:00
James Rhodes
5c02113bf9 Migrate "Run Command" to use Drydock hosts
Summary: This migrates the "Run Remote Command" build step over to use Drydock hosts and Harbormaster artifacts.

Test Plan:
Created a build plan with a "Lease Host" step and a "Run Command" step.  Configured the "Run Command" step to use the artifact from the "Lease Host" step.

Saw the results:

{F87377}

{F87378}

Reviewers: epriestley, #blessed_reviewers

Reviewed By: epriestley

CC: Korvin, epriestley, aran

Maniphest Tasks: T1049, T4111

Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D7707
2013-12-05 14:06:22 +11:00
James Rhodes
53250d84df Introduce HarbormasterBuildTarget to snapshot build steps through a build
Summary: This implements build targets as outlined in D7582.  Build targets represent an instance of a build step particular to the build.  Logs and artifacts have been adjusted to attach to build targets instead of build / build step pairs.

Test Plan: Ran builds and clicked around the interface.  Everything seemed to work.

Reviewers: epriestley, #blessed_reviewers

Reviewed By: epriestley

CC: Korvin, epriestley, aran

Maniphest Tasks: T4111, T1049

Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D7703
2013-12-05 12:01:12 +11:00
James Rhodes
eccbbce9a2 Allow users to create buildables from diffs
Summary:
Now that diffs have PHIDs we can create buildables for them.

This also adds `buildable.diff` in the variables list so the diff ID is available, and it also fixes the Cancel button on "Edit Plan" page so it redirects to the right place.

Test Plan: Created a buildable from a diff, ran a build plan against it that had `echo ${buildable.diff}` and got the right ID.  Also tested the "Edit Plan" cancel redirect.

Reviewers: epriestley, #blessed_reviewers

Reviewed By: epriestley

CC: Korvin, epriestley, aran

Maniphest Tasks: T1049

Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D7546
2013-11-09 15:08:34 -08:00
James Rhodes
79ef667dfd Render build status on revisions and commits
Summary:
This uses an event listener to render the status of builds on their buildables.  The revision and commit view now renders out the status of each of the builds.

Currently the revision controller has the results for the latest diff rendered out.  We might want to show the status of previous diffs in the future, but for now I think the latest diff should do fine.

There's also a number of bug fixes in this diff, including a particularly nasty one where builds would have a build plan PHID generated for them, which resulted in handle lookups always returning invalid objects.

Test Plan: Ran builds against diffs and commits, saw them appear on the revision and commit view controllers.

Reviewers: epriestley, #blessed_reviewers

Reviewed By: epriestley

CC: Korvin, epriestley, aran

Maniphest Tasks: T1049

Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D7544
2013-11-09 15:04:00 -08:00
epriestley
56c65e33ef Add a "Make an HTTP Request" build step
Summary:
Ref T1049. This is very minimal, but does what it says.

I merged the variable replacement code so Remote + HTTP can share more stuff.

Test Plan:
Ran "HTTP" and "Remote" build plans.

{F79886}

{F79887}

Reviewers: hach-que, btrahan

Reviewed By: hach-que

CC: zeeg, aran

Maniphest Tasks: T1049

Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D7541
2013-11-09 07:16:12 -08:00
James Rhodes
0ac1be7094 Implemented support for build logs
Summary:
Depends on D7519.

This implements support for build logs in Harbormaster.  This includes support for appending to a log from the "Run Remote Command" build step.

It also adds the ability to cancel builds.

Currently the build view page doesn't update the logs live; I'm sure this can be achieved with Javelin, but I don't have enough experience with Javelin to actually make it poll from updates to content in the background.

{F79151}

{F79153}

{F79150}

{F79152}

Test Plan:
Tested this by setting up SSH on a Windows machine and using a Remote Command configured with:

```
C:\Windows\system32\cmd.exe /C cd C:\Build && mkdir Build_${timestamp} && cd Build_${timestamp} && git clone --recursive https://github.com/hach-que/Tychaia.git && cd Tychaia && Protobuild.exe && C:\Windows\Microsoft.NET\Framework\v4.0.30319\MSBuild.exe Tychaia.Windows.sln
```

and observed the output of the build stream from the Windows machine into Phabricator.

Reviewers: epriestley, #blessed_reviewers

Reviewed By: epriestley

CC: Korvin, epriestley, aran

Maniphest Tasks: T1049

Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D7521
2013-11-08 18:15:07 -08:00
James Rhodes
7ffea0463e Use herald to trigger builds of revisions and commits.
Summary:
Depends on D7500.

This seemed like a pretty good idea once I thought of it.  Instead of having some custom triggering logic instead Harbormaster, I figured it best to leverage all of Herald's power so that users can create rules to apply builds to commits and differential revisions.  This gives the added advantage that they can trigger off builds for particular types of revisions and commits, which seems like it could be really useful (e.g. run extra tests against revisions that touch sensitive areas of the code).

Test Plan: Ran the usual daemons + the Harbormaster daemon.  Pushed a commit to the repository and saw both the buildable and build get created when the commit worked picked it up.  Submitted a diff and saw both the buildable and build get created when the Herald rules were evaluated for the diff.

Reviewers: epriestley, #blessed_reviewers

Reviewed By: epriestley

CC: Korvin, epriestley, aran, hwinkel

Maniphest Tasks: T1049

Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D7501
2013-11-08 16:58:39 -08:00
epriestley
377742c23a Get some level of meaningful status information into Harbormaster buildable list
Summary: Ref T1049. Nothing fancy, but shows red for fail/error and green for pass. See discussion in D7502.

Test Plan: {F78839}

Reviewers: hach-que, btrahan

Reviewed By: btrahan

CC: aran

Maniphest Tasks: T1049

Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D7512
2013-11-06 11:26:17 -08:00
James Rhodes
8cae7f999f Make the buildables list a little nicer.
Summary:
Depends on D7501.

This just renders the buildable's actual object name onto the list, so you can see at a glance what the buildable represents.  I'd like to also pull across a list of builds of this buildable and change the bar color, but I'm not quite sure how to do that in the search architecture without N+1 querying.

Test Plan:
Looked at the buildable list and it looked like this:

{F78555}

Reviewers: epriestley, #blessed_reviewers

Reviewed By: epriestley

CC: Korvin, epriestley, aran

Maniphest Tasks: T1049

Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D7502
2013-11-06 06:14:26 -08:00
James Rhodes
e4569e7e7e Implement interface for adding, editing and deleting build steps on plans.
Summary: This implements an interface for adding new build steps, editing existing build steps and deleting build steps from build plans.  It uses the settings definitions on the build implementation to work out what fields should be displayed on the edit page.

Test Plan:
See screenshots:

{F78529}

{F78532}

{F78528}

{F78531}

{F78527}

{F78530}

Reviewers: epriestley, #blessed_reviewers

Reviewed By: epriestley

CC: Korvin, epriestley, aran

Maniphest Tasks: T1049

Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D7500
2013-11-05 14:08:44 -08:00
James Rhodes
ca5400d14b Implement basic Harbormaster daemon and start builds.
Summary: This implements a basic Harbormaster daemon that takes pending builds and builds them (currently just sleeps 15 seconds before moving to passed state).  It also implements an interface to apply a build plan to a buildable, so that users can kick off builds for a buildable.

Test Plan: Ran `bin/phd debug PhabricatorHarbormasterBuildDaemon` and used the interface to start some builds by applying a build plan.  Observed them move from 'pending' to 'building' to 'passed'.

Reviewers: epriestley, #blessed_reviewers

Reviewed By: epriestley

CC: Korvin, epriestley, aran

Maniphest Tasks: T1049

Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D7498
2013-11-05 12:48:36 -08:00
epriestley
b5a009337f Harbormaster v(-2)
Summary:
Ref T1049. I don't really want to sink too much time into this right now, but a seemingly reasonable architecture came to me in a dream. Here's a high-level overview of how things fit together:

  - **"Build"**: In Harbormaster, "build" means any process we want to run against a working copy. It might actually be building an executable, but it might also be running lint, running unit tests, generating documentation, generating symbols, running a deploy, setting up a sandcastle, etc.
  - `HarbormasterBuildable`: A "buildable" is some piece of code which build operations can run on. Generally, this is either a Differential diff or a Diffusion commit. The Buildable class just wraps those objects and provides a layer of abstraction. Currently, you can manually create a buildable from a commit. In the future, this will be done automatically.
  - `HarbormasterBuildStep`: A "build step" is an individual build operation, like "run lint", "run unit", "build docs", etc. The step defines how to perform the operation (for example, "run unit tests by executing 'arc unit'"). In this diff, this barely exists.
  - `HarbormasterBuildPlan`: This glues together build steps into groups or sequences. For example, you might want to "run unit", and then "deploy" if the tests pass. You can create a build plan which says "run step "unit tests", then run step "deploy" on success" or whatever. In the future, these will also contain triggers/conditions ("Automatically run this build plan against every commit") and probably be able to define failure actions ("If this plan fails, send someone an email"). Because build plans will run commands, only administrators can manage them.
  - `HarbormasterBuild`: This is the concrete result of running a `BuildPlan` against a `Buildable`. It tracks the build status and collects results, so you can see if the build is running/successful/failed. A `Buildable` may have several `Build`s, because you can execute more than one `BuildPlan` against it. For example, you might have a "documentation" build plan which you run continuously against HEAD, but a "unit" build plan which you want to run against every commit.
  - `HarbormasterBuildTarget`: This is the concrete result of running a `BuildStep` against a `Buildable`. These are children of `Build`. A step might be able to produce multiple targets, but generally this is something like "Unit Tests" or "Lint" and has an overall status, so you can see at a glance that unit tests were fine but lint had some issues.
  - `HarbormasterBuildItem`: An optional subitem for a target. For lint, this might be an individual file. For unit tests, an individual test. For normal builds, an executable. For deploys, a server. For documentation generation, there might just not be subitems.
  - `HarbormasterBuildLog`: Provides extra information, like command/execution transcripts. This is where stdout/stderr will get dumped, and general details and other messages.
  - `HarbormasterBuildArtifact`: Stores side effects or results from build steps. For example, something which builds a binary might put the binary in "Files" and then put its PHID here. Unit tests might put coverage information here. Generally, any build step which produces some high-level output object can use this table to record its existence.

This diff implements almost nothing and does nothing useful, but puts most of these object relationships in place. The two major things you can't easily do with these objects are:

  1) Run arbitrary cron jobs. Jenkins does this, but it feels tacked on and I don't know of anyone using it for that. We could create fake Buildables to get a similar effect, but if we need to do this I'd rather do it elsewhere in general. Build and cron/service/monitoring feel like pretty different problems to me.
  2) Run parameterized/matrix steps (maybe?). Bamboo has this plan/stage/task/job breakdown where a build step can generate a zillion actual jobs, like "build client on x86", "build server on x86", "build client on ARM", "build server on ARM", etc. We can sort of do this by having a Step map to multiple Targets, but I haven't really thought about it too much and it may end up being not-great. I'd guess we have like an 80% chance of getting a clean implementation if/when we get there. I suspect no one actually needs this, or when they do they'll just implement a custom Step and it can be parameterized at that level. I'm not too worried about this overall.

The major difference between this and Jenkins/Bamboo/TravisCI is that all three of those are **plan-centric**: the primary object in the system is a build plan, and the dashboard shows you all your build plans and the current status. I don't think this is the right model. One disadvantage is that you basically end up with top-level messaging that says "Trunk is broken", not "Trunk was broken by commit af32f392f". Harbormaster is **buildable-centric**: the primary object in the system is stuff you can run build operations against (commits/branches/revisions), and actual build plans are secondary. The main view will be "recent commits on this branch, and whether they're good or not" -- which I think is what's most important in a larger/more complex product -- not the pass/fail status of all jobs. This also makes it easier and more natural to integrate with Differential and Diffusion, which both care about the overall status of the commit/revision, not the current status of jobs.

Test Plan: Poked around, but this doesn't really do anything yet.

Reviewers: btrahan

Reviewed By: btrahan

CC: zeeg, chad, aran, seporaitis

Maniphest Tasks: T1049

Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D7368
2013-10-22 15:01:06 -07:00