Summary:
Ref T4100.
- Make it easy to choose all open or closed tasks.
- Make "special" tokenizers composable.
- Get `viewer()` generating documentation properly.
Test Plan:
- Ran queries with new tokens.
- Browsed new tokens.
- Viewed docs on new tokens.
- Used plain status tokens.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: chad, epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T4100
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D12530
Summary:
Ref T4100.
This makes it slightly harder to choose, say, all priorities above X or all priorities except Y. We could add `open()`, `closed()`, `min()`, `max()`, and `not()` functions if there's a meaningful demand for them. I suspect some of these are maybe worthwhile while others aren't as worthwhile.
Test Plan: {F380058}
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T4100
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D12528
Summary: Ref T4100. Update these controls to allow functions like `viewer()`.
Test Plan: Used the new controls.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T4100
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D12527
Summary:
Ref T4100. Share all edge logic code across applications.
- Internalizes the "check that the viewer can see projects" check into edge logic.
- Adds some convenience functions. Some of these aren't really all that convenient, but it's rare that we actually apply project constraints to queries in the applications -- and most of these callsites will go away in the long term -- so I didn't go too crazy with providing a simpler `withProjectPHIDs()` universal API or anything.
Test Plan:
- Grepped for all affected symbols.
- Tried to violate policies.
- Used workboards.
- Used normal Maniphest queries.
- Used `maniphest.query`.
- Verified the special grouping behavior works as expected.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T4100
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D12526
Summary: Ref T4100. Collapse the five inputs into one.
Test Plan:
- Searched for a bunch of stuff.
- Used "Group By: Project", which is a bit of a special case and possibly tricky.
- Created an old query with all the fields, then updated; verified it was preserved/transformed correctly.
{F379971}
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T4100
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D12525
Summary:
Ref T4100.
- Removes the "with unowned" checkbox in favor of the "no owners" function.
- Support functions in "Authors" and "Owners".
Test Plan:
- Ran various global search and Maniphest queries.
{F379931}
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T4100
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D12523
Summary:
Ref T7664. Currently, when spreading subpriorities we may recurse deeply in certain conditions. Make sure we never recurse more than one level.
To try to mitigate issues with floating point precision, be more aggressive about selecting tasks to reorder.
I wasn't really able to come up with a realistic test case here, and the test cases I found which sort of approximated the behavior took way too long to generate data to actually commit.
This approach is inherently somewhat fragile but hopefully this is approximately good enough. We don't have a durable storage engine which can meaningfully represent double-linked lists right now.
Test Plan:
- Wrote some (slow) tests which kind of approximately hit the issue.
- Verified they maxed out at stack depth 2 after the change.
- Unit tests still pass.
- Dragged some tasks around.
- Couldn't come up with any pathological issues here by thinking about it?
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T7664
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D12511
Summary: Ref T4100. Support viewer(), members(), and add a new none().
Test Plan:
- Used all new functions.
- Batch edited tasks with unassign action.
- Saved a query from master, upgrade it to this patch, checkbox migrated cleanly into a "no one" token.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T4100
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D12470
Summary:
Ref T4100. Ref T5595. This allows PolicyAwareQuery to write all the logic for AND, OR, NOT, and NULL (i.e., "not in any projects") queries against any edge type.
It accepts an edge type and a list of constraints (which are basically just operator-value pairs, like `<NOT, PHID-X-Y>`, meaning the results must not have an edge connecting them to `PHID-X-Y`).
This doesn't actually do anything yet; see future diffs.
Test Plan: `arc unit --everything`
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T4100, T5595
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D12455
Summary:
Ref T7803. Prior to this change sequence, Query classes conflated paging values (the actual thing that goes in a "x > 3" clause) with cursor values (arbitrary identifiers which track where the user is in a result list).
Although the two can sometimes be the same, the vast majority of implementations are simpler and better when object IDs are used as cursors and paging values are derived from them.
The new stuff handles this in a consistent way, so we're free to separate getPagingValue() from paging. The new method is essentially getResultCursor().
This also implements getPageCursors(), which allows queries to return directional cursors. The inability to do this was a practical limitation blocking the implementation of T7803.
Test Plan:
- Browsed a bunch of results and paged through queries.
- Grepped for removed methods.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T7803
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D12383
Summary:
Ref T7803. The ApplicationSearch integration is still a little rough here, but it seems to have the correct behavior.
The rest of this is now at least relatively sane, cohesive, and properly behaved.
Test Plan:
- Used all grouping and ordering queries in Maniphest. Pagingated results.
- Used custom field ordering in Maniphest. Paginated results.
- Paginated through the `null` section of "Assigned" and "Projects" group-by queries. Pagingation now works correctly (it does not work at HEAD).
- Ran unit tests covering priority changes.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T7803
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D12372
Summary:
Ref T7803. Removes some getReversePaging().
This also fixes `null` column handling, by adding an explicit `'null'` key with possible values "head" (put NULL before other values) or "tail" (put NULL after other values).
Maniphest has some glitchiness in paging through NULLs right now, but I believe it's all pre-existing and will be resolved when it fully converts. Diffusion is fully converted and pages through NULL correctly.
Test Plan:
- Failed to identify any reason for ChangesetQuery to reverse paging.
- Paged thorugh Diffusion.
- Paged through Maniphest.
- Maniphest has some issues when paging inside a NULL section, but these issues are preexisting and will be resolved later in this change sequence.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T7803
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D12371
Summary:
Ref T7803. Some Query subclasses implement getPagingColumn() in a trivial way, usually to provide a table alias.
Formalize the concept of a primary table alias, and remove obsoleted getPagingColumn() implementations.
Test Plan: Issued affected queries.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T7803
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D12356
Summary: Ref T7803. Reduce the amount of code we're trusting to build SQL queries.
Test Plan:
- Paged through results in Maniphest, Differential and Diffusion.
- Some of the NULLable groups in Maniphest are a bit funky but this was preexisting.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T7803
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D12353
Summary: Ref T7689. Ref T4100. This advances the goals of removing `loadViewerHandles()` (only 67 callsites remain!) and letting tokenizers some day take token functions like `viewer()` and `members(differential)`.
Test Plan:
- Sent a new message; used "To".
- I simplified the cancel URI construction slightly because it's moot in all normal cases.
- Edited a thread; used "Add Participants".
- Searched rooms; used "Participants".
- Searched countdowns; used "Authors".
- Created a diff; used "Repository".
- Edited a revision; edited "Projects"; edited "Reveiwers"; edited "Subscribers".
- Searched for revisions; edited "responsible users"; "authors"; "reviwers"; "subscribers"; "repositories".
- Added revision comments; edited "Add Reveiwers"; "Add Subscribers".
- Commented on a commit; edited "Add Auditors"; "Add subscribers".
- Edited a commit; edited "Projects".
- Edited a repository; edited "Projects".
- Searched feed, used "include Users"; "include Proejcts".
- Searched files, used "authors".
- Edited initiative; edited "Projects".
- Searched backers; used "Backers".
- Searched initiatives; used "Owners".
- Edited build plans; edited "Run Command".
- Searched Herald; used "Authors".
- Added signature exemption in Legalpad.
- Searhced legalpad; used "creators"; used "contributors".
- Searched signatures; used "documents"; used "signers".
- Created meme.
- Searched macros; used "Authors".
- Used "Projects" in Maniphest reports.
- Used Maniphest comment actions.
- Edited Maniphest tasks; edited "Assigned To"; edited "CC"; edited "projects".
- Used "parent" in Maniphest task creation workflow.
- Searched for projects; used "assigned to"; "in any projec"; "in all projects"; "not in projects"; "in users' projects"; "authors"; "subscribers".
- Edited Maniphest bug filing domains, used "Default Author".
- Searched for OAuth applications, used "Creators".
- Edited Owners pacakge; edited "Primary Owner"; edited "Owners".
- Searched for Owners packages; used "Owner".
- OMG this UI is OLD
- Edited a paste; edited "Projects".
- Searched for paste; used "Authors".
- Searched user activity log; used "Actors"; used "Users".
- Edited a mock; edited "Projects"; edited "CC".
- Searched for mocks; used "Authors".
- Edited Phortune account; edited "Members".
- Edited Phortune merchant account; edited "Members".
- Searched Phrequent; used "Users".
- Edited Ponder question; sued "projects".
- Searched Ponder; used "Authors"; used "Answered By".
- Added project members.
- Searched for projects; used "Members".
- Edited a Releeph product; edited "Pushers".
- Searched pull requests; searched "Requestors".
- Edited an arcanist project; used "Uses Symbols From".
- Searhced push logs; used "Repositories"; used "Pushers".
- Searched repositories; used "In nay project".
- Used global search; used Authors/owners/Subscribers/In Any Project.
- Edited a slowvote; used "Projects".
- Searched slovotes; used "Authors".
- Created a custom "Users" field; edited and searched for it.
- Made a whole lot of typos in this list. ^^^^^^
Did not test:
- Lint is nontrivial to test locally, I'll test it in production.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T4100, T7689
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D12224
Summary:
Fixes T7664. When there are a large number of tasks (400+) with the same subpriority (which can happen if the subpriority features are rarely used), it may take more than 30 seconds to rebalance them.
Make the algorithm more aggressive about rebalancing homogenous blocks of tasks.
This may need to get even fancier, but I'd guess it can process blocks 1-2 orders of magnitude larger, which should be ~all installs.
(If someone still hits issues with this, I'll make it fancier.)
Once a block is rebalanced, it doesn't need to be rebalanced again (at least, not as a whole block) so we basically just need to get over the initial hurdle here and then we're good.
In the worst case, we can provide `bin/maniphest rebalance` or similar and do the rebalance step offline.
And, in any case, we have more test coverage here now.
Test Plan:
- Existing tests.
- New tests.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T7664
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D12166
Summary:
Fixes T7563. Fixes T5201. Reframe this as two separate operations:
- Move before or after a task.
- Move to the beginning or end of a priority.
Then:
- Make all the order queries unambiguous and properly reversible, with an explicit `id` order.
- Just reuse `ManiphestTask` to get results in the correct order.
- Simplify the actual transaction apply logic.
- Detect and recover from cases where tasks have identical or similar subpriorities.
Test Plan:
- Wrote and executed unit tests.
- Dragged and dropped tasks within priorities and between priorities in the main Maniphest view.
- Dragged and dropped tasks within priorities in the workboard view, when ordered by priority.
- Also poked at the "natural" order, but that shouldn't be affected.
Reviewers: btrahan, chad
Reviewed By: chad
Subscribers: chad, epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T5201, T7563
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D12121
Summary: Fixes T7392. I kind of stink at SQL so my approach here was to "start over" conceptually and this way makes the most sense to me - we basically do one join on the dependency table and then a second join back from the dependency table to the main task table. In the where clause we filter the resulting rows, first checking the data from dependency join for existence as appropros and then checking the second join for main task table for the proper "open" task values.
Test Plan: made a task X be blocked by task Y. closed task y. search for "not blocked" tasks and saw task X.
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: Korvin, epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T7392
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D11962
Summary: Fixes T7434. We need to LEFT JOIN, not JOIN here, because we still want result rows where the value is `null`.
Test Plan: Issued blocked/not-blocked + blocking/not-blocking queries, got results in all cases.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T7434
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D11939
Summary: Fixes T7421. Now that we join the task table again to ignore //closed// blockers, all the column names are ambiguous. Make them unambiguous.
Test Plan: Issued some searches with various different parameters.
Reviewers: btrahan, joshuaspence, chad
Reviewed By: chad
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T7421
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D11922
Summary: Fixes T7392. When filtering blocked/blocking Maniphest tasks, don't consider closed tasks.
Test Plan:
# Created `T1` and `T2` with `T2 depends on T1`.
# Marked `T1` as resolved.
# Searched for tasks "blocked by other tasks" and noted that `T2` wasn't in the result set.
Reviewers: btrahan, #blessed_reviewers, epriestley
Reviewed By: #blessed_reviewers, epriestley
Subscribers: Korvin, epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T7392
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D11911
Summary: Fixes T7118. This does the basic "filter the list" thing, though it ends up being a little manual since I guess this hasn't come up before? There is also potential weird behavior if the user was using an app and lost access to it - they will have nothing selected on edit - but I think this is actually correct behavior in this circumstance.
Test Plan:
used a user who couldn't get access to the "quick create" apps and noted that the dropdown list on dashboard panel create was missing the expected engines
ran `arc unit --everything` to verify abstract method implemented everywhere
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: Korvin, epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T7118
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D11687
Summary: Fixes T7094 (last of many revisions). Its important to do this filtering ASAP so that users can't deduce the identify of an unknown / invisible project.
Test Plan: executed a query for tasks in project foo using user bar. using user foo, lock user bar out of project foo. reissued the query and saw "no data" as well as "restricted project" in the project typeahead.
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: Korvin, epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T7094
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D11660
Summary:
Fixes T5352. This is very useful for finding things that should be easy to do ("not blocked") as well as things that are important to do ("blocking"). I have wanted to check out the latter case in our installation, though no promises on what I would end up actually doing from that search result list. =D
I also think supporting something like T6638 is reasonable but the UI seems trickier to me; its some sort of task tokenizer, which I don't think we've done before?
Test Plan: toggled various search options and got reasonable results. When i clicked conflicting things like "blocking" and "not blocking" verified it was like I had not clicked anything at all.
Reviewers: chad, epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: Korvin, epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T5352
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D11306
Summary: Ref T6822.
Test Plan: Visual inspection. These methods are only called from within the `PhabricatorApplicationSearchEngine` class.
Reviewers: #blessed_reviewers, epriestley
Reviewed By: #blessed_reviewers, epriestley
Subscribers: Korvin, epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T6822
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D11242
Summary: Modernize remaining edges to subclass `PhabricatorEdgeType`. Largely based on D11045.
Test Plan: Browsed around and performed various actions include subscribing, unsubscribing and watching.
Reviewers: #blessed_reviewers, epriestley
Reviewed By: #blessed_reviewers, epriestley
Subscribers: epriestley
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D11116
Summary: Ref T5245. This is some of the associated cleanup there.
Test Plan:
foreach ManiphestTaskQuery site, I made the change (or not) and tested as follows:
=== Call sites where added needProjectPHIDs ===
- PhabricatorHomeMainController - loaded the home page
- ManiphestBatchEditController - batch edited some tasks (added a project)
- ManiphestConduitAPIMethod - tested implicitly when tested ManiphestUpdateConduitAPIMethod
- ManiphestInfoConduitAPIMethod - used the method via conduit console with input id : 1
- ManiphestQueryConduitAPIMethod - used the method via conduit console with input ids : [1, 2]
- ManiphestUpdateConduitAPIMethod - used the method via conduit with input id : 1 and comment : “asdasds"
- ManiphestReportController - viewed “By User” and “By Project”
- ManiphestSubpriorityController - changed the priority of a task via a drag on manphest home
- ManiphestTaskMailReceiver - updated Task 1 via bin/mail receive-test with a comment that is the README
- ManiphestTaskSearchEngine - loaded Manifest home page
- ManiphestTaskEditController - edited a task
- ManiphestTransactionEditor - closed a blocking task
- ManiphestTransactionSaveController - commented on a task
- PhabricatorProjectProfileController - viewed project with id of 1 that has a few tasks in it
- PhabricatorSearchAttachController - merged tasks together
- DifferentialTransactionEditor - submit a diff that references a task; commit the diff (thus closing the diff) and the task gets updated
- PhabricatorRepositoryCommitMessageParserWorker - submit a diff that references a task; commit the diff (thus closing the diff) and the task gets updated
=== Calls sites where *did not* add needProjectPHIDs (they do not appear in this revision) ===
- PhabricatorManiphestApplication - loaded the home page
- ManiphestGetTaskTransactionsConduitAPIMethod - used the method via conduit console with input ids : [1, 2] ManiphestTaskDetailController - viewed a task with and without associated projects; finished workflow creating a task with a parent
- ManiphestTransactionPreviewController - verified transaction preview showed up properly
- PhabricatorProjectBoardViewController - viewed a board
- PhabricatorProjectMoveController - moved a task around
- ManiphestRemarkupRule - made a task reference like {T123}
- ManiphestTaskQuery - executed a custom query for all tasks with page size of 2 and paginated through some tasks
- ManiphestTaskPHIDType - nothing random seems broken? =D
=== Call sites where had to do something funky ===
- ManiphestHovercardEventListener - loaded hover cards from task mentions
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: Korvin, epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T5245
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D11004
Summary: (Needed a clean branch). Moves the field up and renames to Query
Test Plan: Visit Maniphest Search, see new field, test a query
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: Korvin, epriestley
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10971
Summary: Fixes T5604. This should fix some random bugs, lets us move forward more easily, and all that good stuff about killing code debt.
Test Plan:
- Conduit method maniphest.createtask
- verified creating user subscribed
- verified subscription transaction
- Conduit method maniphest.update
- verified subscribers set as specified to ccPHIDs parameter
- verified subscription transaction
- Herald
- verified herald rule to add subscriber worked
- verified no subscribers removed accidentally
- edit controller
- test create and verify author gets added IFF they put themselves in subscribers control box
- test update gets set to exactly what user enters
- lipsum generator'd tasks work
- bulk add subscribers works
- bulk remove subscriber works
- detail controller
- added myself by leaving a comment
- added another user via explicit action
- added another user via implicit mention
- task merge via search attach controller
- mail reply handler
- add subscriber via ./bin/mail receive-test
- unsubscribe via ./bin/mail receive-test
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: Korvin, epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T5604
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10965
Summary:
Resolves T4659. This implements support for sorting tasks by custom fields.
Some of this feels hacky in the way it's hooked up to the Maniphest search engine and task query.
Test Plan: Queryed on a custom date field, with a small page size, and moved back and forth through the result set.
Reviewers: #blessed_reviewers, epriestley
Reviewed By: #blessed_reviewers, epriestley
Subscribers: epriestley, Korvin
Maniphest Tasks: T4659
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10106
Summary: Ref T5655. Rename `PhabricatorPHIDType` subclasses for clarity (see discussion in D9839). I'm not too keen on some of the resulting class names, so feel free to suggest alternatives.
Test Plan: Ran unit tests.
Reviewers: epriestley, #blessed_reviewers
Reviewed By: epriestley, #blessed_reviewers
Subscribers: epriestley, Korvin, hach-que
Maniphest Tasks: T5655
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D9986
Summary: Ref T5655. Some discussion in D9839. Generally speaking, `Phabricator{$name}Application` is clearer than `PhabricatorApplication{$name}`.
Test Plan:
# Pinned and uninstalled some applications.
# Applied patch and performed migrations.
# Verified that the pinned applications were still pinned and that the uninstalled applications were still uninstalled.
# Performed a sanity check on the database contents.
Reviewers: btrahan, epriestley, #blessed_reviewers
Reviewed By: epriestley, #blessed_reviewers
Subscribers: hach-que, epriestley, Korvin
Maniphest Tasks: T5655
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D9982
Summary: Fixes T5661. We may now pick up a conflicting `dateCreated` field from an edge table join.
Test Plan: Ran a project + dateCreated filtering query, no longer got an exception.
Reviewers: btrahan, joshuaspence
Reviewed By: joshuaspence
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T5661
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D9997
Summary: Ref T5245. This property predates edges and is unusual in modern applications. Stop writes to it and populate it implicitly from edges when querying.
Test Plan:
- Viewed task list.
- Created a task.
- Added and removed projects from tasks.
Reviewers: joshuaspence, chad, btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T5245
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D9851
Summary: Ref T5245. This moves the actual storage over and stops reads and writes to the old table.
Test Plan:
- Verified tasks retained projects across the migration.
- Added and removed projects from tasks.
- Searched for: all, any, users' projects, not-in-projects, no-projects.
Reviewers: chad, btrahan, joshuaspence
Reviewed By: joshuaspence
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T5245
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D9850
Summary: Ref T4420. Update "projects" source.
Test Plan:
- Edited projects on a Differential revision.
- Edited projects on a commit.
- Edited projects on a repository.
- Edited projects in feed search.
- Edited projects in a Herald rule field.
- Edited projects in a Herald rule action.
- Edited projects in Maniphest batch editor.
- Edited projects on Maniphest task.
- Edited projects in "Associate Projects..." action in Maniphest.
- Edited projects on Maniphest search in "all projects", "any project" and "not projects" fields.
- Edited projects on a Paste.
- Edited projects on a Pholio mock.
- Edited projects on a custom policy rule.
- Edited projects on a Ponder question.
- Edited projects on a Diffusion search query.
- Edited projects on a global search query.
- Edited projects on a slowvote.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T4420
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D9884
Summary: I'm pretty sure that `@group` annotations are useless now... see D9855. Also fixed various other minor issues.
Test Plan: Eye-ball it.
Reviewers: #blessed_reviewers, epriestley, chad
Reviewed By: #blessed_reviewers, epriestley
Subscribers: epriestley, Korvin, hach-que
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D9859
Summary:
Fixes T5467.
- Let search engines figure out if they're rendering for a panel or not.
- If Maniphest is rendering a panel, turn off the grips and batch selection.
Test Plan:
- Viewed task panels (no grips).
- Viewed non-panel query results (grips).
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T5467
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D9714
Summary: Ref T4986. Instead of requiring users to know the name of an application search engine class, let them select from a list.
Test Plan:
Created a new panel.
{F165468}
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T4986
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D9500
Summary: Fixes T4818. Clarify that this does not search for arbitrary text substrings.
Test Plan: `grep`
Reviewers: btrahan, chad
Reviewed By: chad
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T4818
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D9278
Summary:
Ref T4673.
IMPORTANT: I had to break one thing (see TODO) to get this working. Not sure how you want to deal with that. I might be able to put the element //inside// the workboard, or I could write some JS. But I figured I'd get feedback first.
General areas for improvement:
- It would be nice to give you some feedback that you have a filter applied.
- It would be nice to let you save and quickly select common filters.
- These would probably both be covered by a dropdown menu instead of a button, but that's more JS than I want to sign up for right now.
- Managing custom filters is also a significant amount of extra UI to build.
- Also, maybe these filters should be sticky per-board? Or across all boards? Or have a "make this my default view"? I tend to dislike implicit stickiness.
Test Plan:
Before:
{F157543}
Apply Filter:
{F157544}
Filtered:
{F157545}
Reviewers: chad, btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: qgil, swisspol, epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T4673
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D9211
Summary: This doesn't have any impact on anything right now (we don't persist the query) but could in the future, so I just left it as-is but fixed the typo.
Test Plan: looked at it carefully
Reviewers: btrahan, chad
Reviewed By: chad
Subscribers: WikiChad, epriestley
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D9155
