Summary: They seem to look OK?
Test Plan: {F48529} {F48530}
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
CC: aran
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6350
Summary:
Ref T603.
- Primarily, this gets rid of a `DifferentialRevisionListData` callsite.
- Also modernize and clean up some UI stuff.
Test Plan:
{F48260}
{F48261}
Reviewers: btrahan, chad
Reviewed By: chad
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T603
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6334
Summary: When I ignore setup issues, I want them to look dealt with, and keep yellow for new ones. Also updated callout colors.
Test Plan: Ignored a number of issues.
Reviewers: epriestley, btrahan
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: aran, Korvin
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6300
Summary: Ref T3322. Depends on D6297. Here are some Phabricator tweaks to complment D6297.
Test Plan: {F47522}
Reviewers: garoevans
Reviewed By: garoevans
CC: aran, chad
Maniphest Tasks: T3322
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6298
Summary:
Ref T2852. Primarily, this expands API access to Asana. As a user-visible effect, it links Asana tasks in Remarkup.
When a user enters an Asana URI, we register an onload behavior to make an Ajax call for the lookup. This respects privacy imposed by the API without creating a significant performance impact.
Test Plan: {F47183}
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: chad, aran
Maniphest Tasks: T2852
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6274
Summary: ...also make it so in Pholio when you add an inline comment the preview refreshes. Fixes T2649.
Test Plan: played around in pholio leaving commentary. noted that a new inline comment would refresh the preview.
Reviewers: epriestley, chad
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: aran, Korvin
Maniphest Tasks: T2649
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6267
Summary:
Currently, it takes one frame for animations to set their first value. For fading stuff in, that means it briefly appears at 100% opacity, then jumps to 0%, then fades in from there.
Instead, immediately tween to the initial value.
Test Plan: Comments in Pholio fade in nicely. Preview is still a janky pile of mess until D6267.
Reviewers: btrahan, chad
Reviewed By: chad
CC: aran
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6268
Summary:
Currently it's not allowed to be left blank (even with required: false)
Fixes T3343
Test Plan: Use the custom date field.
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: aran, Korvin, chad
Maniphest Tasks: T3343
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6251
Summary: Removes extra padding on rendering notifications in jx-notification.
Test Plan: test a notification
Reviewers: epriestley, btrahan
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: aran, Korvin
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6259
Summary: Changes it to a dialog view, tweaks some layout bugs on full width forms.
Test Plan: Tested loging in and resetting my password. Chrome + Mobile
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: aran, Korvin, nrp
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6257
Summary:
Ref T1536.
- When users try to add a one-of provider which already exists, give them a better error (a dialog explaining what's up with reasonable choices).
- Disable such providers and label why they're disabled on the "new provider" screen.
Test Plan:
{F47012}
{F47013}
Reviewers: chad, btrahan
Reviewed By: chad
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T1536
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6256
Summary: Not sure how to test this, but assume it's coming from this hover.
Test Plan: n/a
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: aran, Korvin
Maniphest Tasks: T3425
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6255
Summary: Added in color variables in most used places. Tweaked green to be a bit more serious.
Test Plan: Tested Tags, Error View, Timeline, Object Views, and Color Palette.
Reviewers: epriestley, btrahan
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: aran, Korvin
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6244
Summary: Remade auth and policy icon.
Test Plan: look at the images.
Reviewers: epriestley
CC: aran, Korvin
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6241
Summary: This adds an 83% Light set of colors for highlights, warnings, etc.
Test Plan: Tested Notifications, Error View, and Color Palette page. Test is out, not quite sure on notifications.
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: aran, Korvin
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6239
Summary: See inlines.
Test Plan: Loaded timeline UIExample.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
CC: aran
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6238
Summary: Moves old auth icon to 'policy' and new icon is keys.
Test Plan: photoshop
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: aran, Korvin
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6236
Summary: Picked a set of standard colors. Based on our current Maniphest color set, but tweaked to the same hue with http://color.hailpixel.com/
Test Plan: Not intended to be end all be all, but a decent first cut. Applied to Maniphest and Tags.
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: aran, Korvin
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6229
Summary: Ref T1536. If you only have button-based logins, the new login screen looks weird.
Test Plan:
Before
{F46725}
After
{F46726}
Reviewers: chad, jamesr
Reviewed By: chad
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T1536
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6225
Summary: Touches a lot of little spacing things here and there, stuck to 4px grid when possible, checked mobile views.
Test Plan: Mobile, Logging In, Multiple Providers.
Reviewers: epriestley
CC: aran, Korvin
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6220
Summary: Ref T1536. Many rough / broken edges, but adds the rough skeleton of the provider edit workflow.
Test Plan: {F46333}
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran, chad
Maniphest Tasks: T1536
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6200
Summary: Ref T1536. Adds an initial "choose a provider type" screen for adding a new provider. This doesn't go anywhere yet.
Test Plan: {F46316}
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran, chad
Maniphest Tasks: T1536
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6199
Summary: Ref T1536. These can probably use some design tweaking and there's a bit of a bug with profile images for some providers, but generally seems to be in the right ballpark.
Test Plan:
{F46604}
{F46605}
Reviewers: chad, btrahan
Reviewed By: chad
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T1536
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6210
Summary:
Ref T1536. Currently, we have separate panels for each link/unlink and separate controllers for OAuth vs LDAP.
Instead, provide a single "External Accounts" panel which shows all linked accounts and allows you to link/unlink more easily.
Move link/unlink over to a full externalaccount-based workflow.
Test Plan:
- Linked and unlinked OAuth accounts.
- Linked and unlinked LDAP accounts.
- Registered new accounts.
- Exercised most/all of the error cases.
Reviewers: btrahan, chad
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran, mbishopim3
Maniphest Tasks: T1536
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6189
Summary: Ref T1536. Error state is a bit gross but we need to sort that out in general.
Test Plan:
{F46549}
{F46550}
Reviewers: chad, btrahan
Reviewed By: chad
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T1536
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6208
Summary:
Ref T1536. Ref T1930. Code is not reachable.
This provides password authentication and registration on the new provider/adapter framework.
I sort of cheated a little bit and don't really route any password logic through the adapter (instead, this provider uses an empty adapter and just sets the type/domain on it). I think the right way to do this //conceptually// is to treat username/passwords as an external black box which the adapter communicates with. However, this creates a lot of practical implementation and UX problems:
- There would basically be two steps -- in the first one, you interact with the "password black box", which behaves like an OAuth provider. This produces some ExternalAccount associated with the username/password pair, then we go into normal registration.
- In normal registration, we'd proceed normally.
This means:
- The registration flow would be split into two parts, one where you select a username/password (interacting with the black box) and one where you actually register (interacting with the generic flow). This is unusual and probably confusing for users.
- We would need to do a lot of re-hashing of passwords, since passwords currently depend on the username and user PHID, which won't exist yet during registration or the "black box" phase. This is a big mess I don't want to deal with.
- We hit a weird condition where two users complete step 1 with the same username but don't complete step 2 yet. The box knows about two different copies of the username, with two different passwords. When we arrive at step 2 the second time we have a lot of bad choices about how to reoslve it, most of which create security problems. The most stragihtforward and "pure" way to resolve the issues is to put password-auth usernames in a separate space, but this would be incredibly confusuing to users (your login name might not be the same as your username, which is bizarre).
- If we change this, we need to update all the other password-related code, which I don't want to bother with (at least for now).
Instead, let registration know about a "default" registration controller (which is always password, if enabled), and let it require a password. This gives us a much simpler (albeit slightly less pure) implementation:
- All the fields are on one form.
- Password adapter is just a shell.
- Password provider does the heavy lifting.
We might make this more pure at some point, but I'm generally pretty satisfied with this.
This doesn't implement the brute-force CAPTCHA protection, that will be coming soon.
Test Plan: Registered with password only and logged in with a password. Hit various error conditions.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran, chad
Maniphest Tasks: T1536, T1930
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6164
Summary: make it work with z-index and make it grey.
Test Plan:
clicked the grey button and it worked! Safari and Chrome
clicked around and observed loading mask functioning correctly
Reviewers: epriestley, chad
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: aran, Korvin
Maniphest Tasks: T3396
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6207
Summary: Rough pass at a PHUIButtonView Class. Keeps phutil_tag intact and adds some image features if you use the class.
Test Plan: UIExamples
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: aran, Korvin
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6192
Summary: Restrict the menu hovers to desktop
Test Plan: test desktop and mobile
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: aran, Korvin
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6190
Summary: Fixes T3242. Changes the red and orange objects to match the transactions. Also adds a highlight color to 'cards'.
Test Plan: Review my audits in my sandbox
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: aran, Korvin
Maniphest Tasks: T3242
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6184
Summary: Decided to just remove the hover grey to white, seems fine with the new white icons.
Test Plan: use homepage + icons
Reviewers: epriestley, btrahan
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: aran, Korvin
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6181
Summary: the people widget was returning a comma-delimited list of HTML nodes so kill that noise with some hsprintf action. We also weren't consistently updating the latest transaction id so simplify those codepaths (widgets vs pontificate) a bit. Fixes T3336.
Test Plan: left some messages, added some participants. noted that the people widget looked good and only the pertinent transactions were pulled down on updates.
Reviewers: epriestley, chad
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: aran, Korvin
Maniphest Tasks: T3336
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6180
Summary: The shadow on the white icons was too harsh for their size, looked bad on timelines.
Test Plan: Check timeline example, phuilist example.
Reviewers: epriestley, btrahan
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: aran, Korvin
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6176
Summary: Took a stab at some login icons for buttons.
Test Plan: photoshop
Reviewers: epriestley, btrahan
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: aran, Korvin
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6174
Summary: Fixes T3330
Test Plan: Test desktop and mobile menus in chrome and ios.
Reviewers: epriestley, btrahan
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: aran, Korvin
Maniphest Tasks: T3330
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6157
Summary: Used more logical icons for subscribe, auto, and delete instead of the mail icons. Fixes T3329
Test Plan: Tested subscribing and unsubscribing in Maniphest.
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: aran, Korvin
Maniphest Tasks: T3329
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6151
Summary: Adds collapsing of the sidebar, also allows you to say where it goes on mobile (above or below content). ToC for example, above. General Navbar, below. Up to you.
Test Plan: Review UIExamples and Diviner.
Reviewers: epriestley, btrahan
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: aran, Korvin
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6150
Summary: Fixes some issues with lists and tablet/mobile layouts.
Test Plan: shrink my screen
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: aran, Korvin
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6148
Summary: Tweaks the dark, grey, and white icons to match the action-icons. Also added a home icon for navigation.
Test Plan: looked at list navs, action menus.
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: aran, Korvin
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6142
Summary:
- Use the same styles for shared operations (`drag-ghost`, `drag-dragging`).
- Move shared code into the base class.
Test Plan: Dragged around tasks and named queries.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
CC: aran
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6141
Summary: Needed to be more restrictive
Test Plan: Test maniphest and list examples.
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: aran, Korvin
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6139
Summary:
Also you have to drop them. So drag, and then drop.
This needs some cleanup and reconciliation/generalization with the Maniphest implementation. In particular, you can't drag things to the very top right now, and they should share more CSS and more behaviors.
Test Plan:
Look I alphabetized them:
{F45286}
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
CC: aran
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6136
Summary: See discussion in D6131, D6130. This turned into 35 layers of mess so throw it away and just tweak the JS to be more flexible.
Test Plan:
- Clicked "Show More Applications".
- Clicked "Show Fewer Applications".
- Edited tasks using popup dialog.
- Tried to drag tasks using pencil icon (correctly no longer works).
- Changed threads in Conpherence.
- Not sure how to actually hit the Conpherence "Load ... Threads" thing since
it seems to auto-load? But that works, at least, and the code doesn't really
care what you hit.
- Added a conpherence participant.
- Added a new calendar item.
- Poked around other menus.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
CC: aran
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6133
Summary:
See discussion in D6130. Basically, all of these should activate workflow:
<a data-sigil="workflow" href="...">...</a>
<div data-sigil="workflow">
<a href="...">...</a>
</div>
<form data-sigil="workflow" action="...">...</form>
<div data-sigil="workflow">
<form action="...">...</form>
</div>
The only case where we don't want to activate workflow is this one:
<form data-sigil="workflow">
<a href="...">...</a>
</form>
Here, the form should workflow but the `<a />` should not.
These cases aren't really covered:
// Undefined no matter where "workflow" is because it's nonsense.
<a><a>...</a></a>
// As above except like a million times more dumb.
<form><form>...</form></form>
// This one is ambiguous. The <a /> will currently workflow. We don't do
// this anywhere and probably never will. If we want a different rule we
// can cross that bridge when we come to it.
<div data-sigil="workflow">
<form action="...">
<a href="...">...</a>
</form>
</div>
Test Plan: Clicked/submitted some things with workflow.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
CC: aran
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6131
Summary: This adds examples and abstracts out CSS for common nav re-use.
Test Plan: Tested DocumentExample and ListExample
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: aran, Korvin
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6138
