Summary: Ref T11123. This implements a very basic skeleton for modern revision search.
Test Plan: Viewed and executed Conduit API method.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T11123
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D16089
Summary:
Ref T10856. The rendering logic was already there, but it was expecting the information under `properties`
field, whereas arc puts it under `metadata`. Not sure if that something that changed a long time ago or if
it was always like this.
Test Plan: {F1252657 size=full}
Reviewers: #blessed_reviewers, epriestley
Reviewed By: #blessed_reviewers, epriestley
Subscribers: Korvin, epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T10856
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15828
Summary: Ref T4103. Fully modernize the filetree show/hide, durable column show/hide, and profile menu collapse/wide settings.
Test Plan:
- Toggled filetree on/off, reloaded page, setting stuck.
- Same with conpherence column and profile menus.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T4103
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D16034
Summary: Change metamta.differential.patch-format over to an enum option now that they're implemented.
Test Plan: Looked at settings page.
Reviewers: #blessed_reviewers, epriestley
Reviewed By: #blessed_reviewers, epriestley
Subscribers: epriestley
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D16032
Summary:
Ref T11092. With Quicksand (or, possibly, some as-yet-unknown non-Quicksand workflow) the client can get stuck with an out-of-date revision PHID.
We then save comments with a `revisionPHID` from one revision and a `changesetID` from a different one.
Detect and prevent this. This stops the workflow immediately when the use first clicks, so it should allow us to detect this issue if it has some other non-Quicksand cause.
Test Plan:
- Opened revision `D123`.
- Pressed `\` to enable the sidebar and Quicksand.
- Clicked a link to revision `D124`.
- Added inlines.
Previously, these could ghost. The exact UI behavior is difficult to describe, but in the database they end up with a `changesetID` for `D124` but the original `revisionPHID` for `D123`, presumably because state is sticking around from the first page.
After this patch, an exception is thrown immediately. Additionally:
- Reloaded to clear quicksand state, added comments fine.
- Disabled sidebar/quicksand, added comments fine.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T11092
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D16031
Summary:
Ref T4103. This doesn't get everything, but takes care of most of the easy stuff.
The tricky-ish bit here is that I need to move timezones, pronouns and translations to proper settings. I expect to pursue that next.
Test Plan:
- Grepped for `loadPreferences` to identify callsites.
- Changed start-of-week setting, loaded Calendar, saw correct start.
- Visited welcome page, read "Adjust Settings" point.
- Loaded Conpherence -- I changed behavior here slightly (switching threads drops the title glyph) but it wasn't consistent to start with and this seems like a good thing to push to the next version of Conpherence.
- Enabled Filetree, toggled in Differential.
- Disabled Filetree, no longer visible in Differential.
- Changed "Unified Diffs" preference to "Small Screens" vs "Always".
- Toggled filetree in Diffusion.
- Edited a task, saw sensible projects in policy dropdown.
- Viewed user profile, uncollapsed/collapsed side nav, reloaded page, sticky'd.
- Toggled "monospaced textareas", used a comment box, got appropriate fonts.
- Toggled durable column.
- Disabled title glyphs.
- Changed monospaced font to 18px/36px impact.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T4103
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D16004
Summary:
Ref T10769. The user availability cache write shouldn't happen in read-only mode, nor should the Differential parse cache write.
(We might want to turn off the availbility feature completely since it's potentially expensive if we can't cache it, but I think we're OK for now.)
Test Plan:
In read-only mode:
- Browsed as a user with an out-of-date availability cache.
- Loaded an older revision without cached parse data.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T10769
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15988
Summary:
Ref T11051. This is still not as clear as it should be, but is at least working as intended now.
I believe this part of the code just never worked. The test plan on D10489 didn't specifically cover it.
Test Plan:
Did this sort of thing in a repository:
```
$ git checkout -b featurex
$ echo x >> y
$ git commit -am wip
$ arc diff
```
Then I simulated just pushing it (this flow is a little more involved than necessary):
```
$ arc land --hold
$ git commit --amend
$ # remove all metadata -- particularly, "Differential Revision"!
$ git push HEAD:master
```
I got a not-great but more-useful dialog:
{F1667318}
Prior to this change, the hash match was incorrectly not reported at all.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T11051
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15989
Summary: Fixes T11010. This also needs to be inflated until we fix the whole client/server responsibility issue here.
Test Plan:
- Created a revision while observing error log, no error.
- Disabled "allow self accept", tried to make myself a reviewer, got rejected with an error message.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T11010
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15966
Summary:
Ref T10939. This makes the `viewer()` function work again. It retains its own meaning (viewer, plus all their projects and packages).
There's no `exact-viewer()` function; we could conceivably add one eventually if we need it.
Test Plan:
- Queried for `viewer()`, got the same results as querying by my own username.
- Browsed function in token browser.
- Reviewed autogenerated documentation.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T10939
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15951
Summary:
Ref T10939. If you haven't installed a dashboard, we show an "Active Revisions" panel on the homepage by default. I waited a bit to update this, but the new buckets don't seem to have caused any major problems so far.
Update this to use the new logic. I'm just showing "must review" + "should review", which is similar to the old beahvior.
Also replace the notification count with this same number. This is a little different from the old behavior, but simpler, and I think we should probably move toward getting rid of these counts completely.
Test Plan:
- Viewed homepage as logged-in user, saw my revisions (including revisions I have authority over only because of project membership).
- Saw consistent notification count.
- Grepped for removed method.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T10939
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15950
Summary:
Ref T10694. If this feels good, I'd plan to eventually add something similar to other applications ("View Task", etc).
Not sure if we should keep the object link later in the mail body or not. I left it for now.
Test Plan: {F1307256, size=full}
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: Korvin
Maniphest Tasks: T10694
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15884
Fixes T10981. Ref T10939. `arc` currently has some odd, hard-coded checks
(missing reviewers, all reviewers away) that depend on the field value being
in a certain format.
The recent changes swapped the field value from scalars (PHIDs) to
dictionaries and broke this workflow. It worked fine in testing because we
apply these checks very inconsistently (not on update or `--edit`).
To get around this for now, serialize into "PHID!" and then unserialize on
the other side. This is icky but keeps us from needing to require an `arc`
upgrade.
These checks are generally bad news and should move to the server side in the
long run (T4631).
(This probably prevents clean `arc diff`, so I'm just cowboy committing it.)
Auditors: chad
Summary: Ref T10939. This adds UI, transactions, etc, to adjust dominion rules.
Test Plan:
- Read documentation.
- Changed dominion rules.
- Created packages on `/` ("A") and `/x` ("B") with "Auto Review: Review".
- Touched `/x`.
- Verified that A and B were added with strong dominion.
- Verified that only B was added when A was set to weak dominion.
- Viewed file in Diffusion, saw correct ownership with strong/weak dominion rules.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T10939
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15936
Summary: Ref T10939. Fixes T4887. Supports "username!" to add a reviewer as blocking.
Test Plan: Added and removed blocking and non-blocking reviewers via CLI.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T4887, T10939
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15934
Summary:
Ref T10939. Adds a `blocking(...)` token.
This code is pretty iffy and going to get worse before it gets better, but the fix (T10967 + EditEngine) is going to be a fair chunk of work down the road.
Test Plan: {F1426966}
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Subscribers: scode
Maniphest Tasks: T10939
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15933
Summary:
Ref T10939. I don't think this is hugely important, but it doesn't clutter things up much and it's nice as a hint.
T4055 was the original request specifically asking for this. It wanted a separate bucket, but I think this use case isn't common/strong enough to justify that.
I would like to improve Differential's "X depends on Y" feature in the long term. We don't tend to use/need it much, but it could easily do a better and more automatic job of supporting review of a group of revisions.
Test Plan: {F1426636}
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T10939
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15930
Summary: Ref T10939. These poor stragglers got left out in the rain. Didn't catch any issues otherwise.
Test Plan: {F1426604}
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T10939
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15929
Summary: Ref T10939. For various historical reasons, revision status is a numeric string. This comparison fails because it's `(string) !== (int)`. Just use `!=` so this will still work if we turn it into a real string in the future.
Test Plan: Tried a more specific test case locally, got better looking results in "Must Review" and "Should Review".
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T10939
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15928
Summary:
Ref T10939. I'm not //totally// opposed to the existence of this element, but I think it's the kind of thing that would never make it upstream today. I think this should just be a T418 custom sort of thing in the long run, not a mainline upstream feature.
Overall, I think this thing is nearly useless and just adds visual clutter. My dashboard is about 100% red. This also sort of teaches users that it's fine to let revisions sit for a couple of days, which isn't what I'd like the UI to teach. Finally, removing it helps the UI feel a little less cluttered after the visually busy changes in D15926.
Test Plan: Grepped for removed config. Viewed revision list.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T10939
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15927
Summary:
Ref T10939. Fixes T9263. Ref T4144.
First, this resolves users (converting users into all packages and projects they are responsible for) earlier, so bucketing can act on that data correctly. Previously, your own blocking reviews would appear in "Must Review" but your packages/projects' would not. Now, all of them will.
Second, this adds `exact(username)` to mean "just me, not my packages/projects". You can use this along with "Bucket: By Required Action" to create a personal view of "Active Revisions" if you'd like, and ignore all your project/package reviews.
Test Plan: Queried by "me" and "exact(me)", got reasonable looking results.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T4144, T9263, T10939
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15925
Summary:
Ref T10939. Ref T4144. This splits the existing buckets ("Blocking Others", "Action Required", "Waiting on Others") into 6-7 buckets with a stronger focus on what the next action you need to take is.
See T10939#175423 for some discussion.
Overall, I think some of the root problems here are caused by reviewer laziness and shotgun review workflows (where a ton of people get automatically added to everything, probably unnecessarily), but these buckets haven't been updated since the introduction of blocking reviewers or project/package reviewers and I think splitting the 3 buckets into 6 buckets isn't unreasonable, even though it's kind of a lot of buckets and the root problem here is approximately "I want to ignore a bunch of stuff on my dashboard".
I didn't remove the old bucketing code yet since it's still in use on the default homepage.
This also isn't quite right until I fix the tokenizer to work properly, since it won't bucket project/package reviewers accurately.
Test Plan: {F1395972}
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T4144, T10939
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15924
Summary:
Ref T10939. Currently, Differential hard-codes some behaviors for the "active" filter. This introduces "buckets" to make this grouping behavior more general/flexible.
The buckets don't actually do any grouping yet, this just gets rid of the `$query === 'active'` stuff so far.
These buckets change the page size to a large value, becuase pagination won't currently work with bucketing.
The problem is that we normally paginate by selecting one more result than we need: so if we're building a page of size 10, we'll select 11 results. This is fast, and if we get 11 back, we know there's a next page with at least one result on it.
With buckets, we can't do this, since our 11 results might come back in these buckets:
- A, B, C, A, C, C, A, A, B, B, (B)
So we know there are more results, and we know that bucket B has more results, but we have no clue if bucket A and bucket C have more results or not (or if there's anything in bucket D, etc).
We might need to select a thousand more results to get the first (D) or the next (A).
So we could render something like "Some buckets have more results, click here to go to the next page", but users would normally expect to be able to see "This specific bucket, A, has more results.", and we can't do that without a lot more work.
It doesn't really matter for revisions, because almost no one has 1K of them, but this may need to be resolved eventually.
(I have some OK-ish ideas for resolving it but nothing I'm particularly happy with.)
Test Plan: {F1376542}
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T10939
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15923
Summary:
Ref T10939. Ref T4144. This moves the revision SearchEngine to modern code so I can add some kind of bucketing layer on top of it.
This seems to have worked pretty cleanly. One thing is that I removed the ability to search for "pending drafts":
- This was added in D1927 from a bootcamp task, was an indirect solution to a questionable problem, and almost certainly would not meet the bar today.
- Later, in D3324, we added the icons to the list. I think this is a better solution in general. In particular, it specifically addressed the query being kind of junky.
- At the time, Differential had a prebuilt "Drafts" filter. This was removed in D6347 with the move to ApplicationSearch, which simplified the large number of prebuilt filters. Although we got a lot of feedback about that, none requested that the drafts filter be restored.
Test Plan: Searched for responsible users, subscribers, orders, projects, repositories.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T4144, T10939
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15921
Summary:
Ref T10939. If you already own a package, don't trigger the subscribe/review rules.
Document how these rules work.
Test Plan:
- Read documentation.
- Removed reviewers, updated a revision, got autoreviewed.
- Joined package.
- Removed reveiwers, updated a revision, no more autoreview.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T10939
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15918
Summary: Ref T10939. Packages are valid reviewers, so let Herald "Add Reviewers" and "Add Blocking Reviewers" actions add them.
Test Plan:
- Wrote a rule to add package reviewers.
- Hit the rule, saw a package reviewer added, viewed transcript.
{F1311731}
{F1311732}
{F1311733}
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T10939
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15917
Summary:
Ref T10939. Fixes T8887. This enables and implements the "review" and "blocking review" options for packages.
This is a bit copy-pastey from `DifferentialReviewersHeraldAction`, which doesn't feel awesome. I think the right fix is Glorious Infrasturcture, though -- I filed T10967 to track that.
Test Plan:
- Set package autoreveiw to "Review".
- Updated, got a reveiwer.
- Set autoreview to "blocking".
- Updated, got a blocking reviewer.
{F1311720}
{F1311721}
{F1311722}
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T8887, T10939
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15916
Summary:
Ref T10939. Ref T8887. This moves toward letting packages automatically become reviewers or blocking reviewers of owned code.
This change adds an "Auto Review" option to packages. Because adding reviewers/blocking reviewers is a little tricky, it doesn't actually have these options yet -- just a "subscribe" option. I'll do the reviewer work in the next update.
Test Plan:
Created a revision in a package with "Auto Review: Subscribe to Changes". The package got subscribed.
{F1311677}
{F1311678}
{F1311679}
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T8887, T10939
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15915
Summary:
Ref T10939. This lets you add packages as reviewers manually.
"Project Reviewers" now lists both projects and packages. I have renamed this to "Coalition Reviewers" but that's probably horrible and confusing. I'm not sure "Group Reviewers" is much better.
Test Plan:
- Added a package as a reviewer manually.
- Joined it, got authority over it.
- Saw the review on my dashboard.
- Accepted the revision, got authority extended to the package review.
{F1311652}
{F1311653}
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T10939
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15914
Summary:
Ref T10939. This allows the CLI to parse reviewers and subscribers like this:
```Reviewers: epriestley, O123 Some Package Name```
The rule goes:
- If a reviewer or subscriber starts with a monogram (like `X111`), just look that up and ignore everything until the next comma.
- Otherwise, split it on spaces and look up each part.
This means that these are valid:
```
alincoln htaft
alincoln, htaft
#a #b epriestley
O123 Some Package, epriestley, #b
```
I think the only real downside is that this:
```
O123 Some Package epriestley
```
...ignores the "epriestley" part. However, I don't expect users to be typing package monograms manually -- they just need to be representable by `arc land` and `arc diff --edit` and such. Those flows will always add commas and make the parse unambiguous.
Test Plan:
- Added test coverage.
- `amend --show`'d a revision with a package subscriber (this isn't currently possible to produce using the web UI, it came from a future change) and saw `Subscribers: O123 package name, usera, userb`.
- Updated a revision with a package subscriber.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T10939
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15911
Summary:
Ref T10939. This has no effect yet since packages can not actually become reviewers, I'm just inching toward support.
- When searching for "responsible users", include revisions that need review by packages you have authority over.
- When calculating review authority, include authority over packages you are a member of (these currently never exist).
Test Plan:
This isn't reachable so I just `var_dump()`'d stuff and looked at the generated queries, which appeared correct/reasonable.
I'll vet this more thoroughly once packages can actually become reviewers.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T10939
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15909
Summary: Fixes T9790. This uses a simple renderer, like the inline context renderer, that emphasizes getting a quick glance at small changes and working reasonably on mobile devices.
Test Plan:
- Set `inline` setting to `9999`.
- Created a diff.
- Saw it render reasonably in HTML mail.
- Also tested text mail to make sure I didn't break that.
{F1310137, size=full}
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T9790
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15901
Summary: Ref T10694. This setting no longer has any effect: we always show a limited amount of context now.
Test Plan: `grep`
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T10694
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15886
Summary:
Ref T10694. General improvements:
- Remove leading empty lines from context snippets.
- Remove trailing empty lines from context snippets.
- If we removed everything, render a note.
- Try using `style` instead of `<pre>`? My thinking is that maybe Airmail has weird default rules for `<pre>`, since that's the biggest / most obvious thing that's different about this element to me.
Test Plan: Viewed normal comments locally, faked a comment on an empty line in the middle of a lot of other empty lines.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T10694
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15864
Summary:
Ref T10694.
- Shift margins/padding around so inlines with multiple paragraphs get reasonable spacing.
- Add `text-decoration: none` to the "View Inline" link to kill the underline.
Test Plan: {F1265342}
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T10694
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15863
Summary: Ref T10694. Move the inline style more toward a mix of standard`<pre>` style and the web UI style for inlines.
Test Plan: See screenshots in comments.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T10694
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15857
Summary:
Ref T10694. This mostly prevents us from having a degenerate case if someone leaves a 200-line inline.
- For one-line inlines, show 1 line of context above and below (3 lines total).
- For 3+ line inlines, show just the inline.
- For 7+ line inlines, show only the first part.
Test Plan: Made a bunch of weird long/short/different-sized comments, saw reasonble-appearing context in text and HTML mail output.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T10694
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15853
Summary:
Ref T10694. Ref T9790. When generating inline diff context, highlight it and then mangle the highlighted output into `style="..."` so it works in HTML.
Also try to tighten up some spacing/formatting stuff.
Test Plan:
Got some output in this vein:
{F1259937}
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T9790, T10694
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15852
Summary:
Ref T10694. This is still missing some pieces, but seems to get most of the data into the mail in a plausible format:
- When an inline remarks on code, show the patch inline in the mail body.
- When an inline replies to another inline, show that other inline in the mail body.
- Apply remarkup rendering to inline content.
- Apply basic styling to mail body blocks.
Not covered yet:
- Syntax highlighting.
- Diff highlighting.
- Maybe clearer style/layout hints to connect comments to what they reply to? Current approach might get messy with inlines that have blockquotes and code blocks inside them, for example.
- I probably want to cap the amount of diff context we ever show to ~7 lines, even if you drag over 200 lines of code.
- CSS is a generally a bit rough still.
- The `unified-comment-context` option is effectively always on now, and should be removed.
- Text section is getting indented right now but probably shouldn't be.
- Spacing, etc., might be a bit off.
Test Plan:
Rigged Home to render these things, got a plausible-looking render (top is text, bottom is HTML):
{F1259052}
Sent myself some inline comment mail, got a plausible result.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T10694
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15850
Summary: Fixes T10906, Fixes T10820. Adds new icons, grey-er colors for previous states. Also, I think fixed a few bugs?
Test Plan: Fake each state, verify icon is as intended.
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: Korvin
Maniphest Tasks: T10820, T10906
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15830
Summary: This will stop breaking if you have subscribers and tags when updating a revision (`Error parsing field "Subscribers": The objects you have listed include objects which do not exist (Tags:)`), which I broke in D15749.
Test Plan: run through arc-diff --update that failed earlier.
Reviewers: chad, #blessed_reviewers, epriestley
Reviewed By: #blessed_reviewers, epriestley
Subscribers: Korvin
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15762
Summary:
In calendar, dashboard, diffusion, diviner, feed, fund,
maniphest, pholio, ponder, and slowvote use the term 'tags' if possible.
This intenctionally skips diffusion, differential, and the projects application itself.
Ref T10326 Ref T10349
Test Plan: inspection on a running, locally modified, system
Reviewers: avivey, epriestley, #blessed_reviewers
Reviewed By: epriestley, #blessed_reviewers
Subscribers: Korvin
Maniphest Tasks: T10835, T10326, T10349
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15753
Summary: Users can't find the "Tags" field in the Edit Menu; Added keyword "Tag".
Test Plan: Looked in Edit page; I think this shouldn't change anything else?
Reviewers: #blessed_reviewers, epriestley
Reviewed By: #blessed_reviewers, epriestley
Subscribers: Korvin
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15749
Summary: Found another bouncing around.
Test Plan: Review in diff
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: Korvin
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15651
Summary: Bumps to 14px, fixes some on Differential
Test Plan: view various headers in Differential
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: Korvin
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15647
Summary: Going to render these all normal case instead of all caps, and bump up the font size. Should be more consistent. Yellow if you green anything orange.
Test Plan: grep, lint
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: Korvin
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15645
Summary: Fixes T10704. This is just bad copy-paste -- "O" for "old" should be "N" for "new".
Test Plan:
- Followed steps on T10704.
- Applied patch.
- Marked inline done, replied, etc. No more JS errors.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T10704
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15566
