Summary:
There are two issues here I was trying to fix:
* Viewing `/conpherence` by logged out users on `secure` would generate an overheated query on `ConpherenceThreadQuery` `secure` has a ton of wacky threads with bogus names.
* When a user views a specific thread that they don't have permission to see, we attempt to fetch the thread's transactions before applying policy filtering. If the thread has more than 1000 comments, that query will also overheat instead of returning a policy exception.
I fixed the first problem, but started trying to fix the second by moving the transaction fetch to `didFilterPage` but it broke in strange ways so I gave up.
Also fix a dangling `qsprintf` update.
Test Plan: Loaded threads and the Conpherence homepage with and without logged in users.
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: Korvin
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D20375
Summary: Ref T13266. Caught one more of these "directly setting afterID" issues in the logs.
Test Plan: Ran `bin/search index --type ConpherenceThread` before and after changes. Before: fatal about a direct call. After: clean index rebuild.
Reviewers: amckinley
Reviewed By: amckinley
Maniphest Tasks: T13266
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D20341
Summary:
See <https://discourse.phabricator-community.org/t/error-when-sending-a-message-chat-room/2548>.
Conpherence calls `setAfterID()` and `setBeforeID()` directly on a subquery, but these methods no longer exist.
Use a pager instead. This code probably shouldn't exist (we should use some other approach to fetch this data in most cases) but that's a larger change.
Test Plan: Sent messages in a Conpherence thread. Before: fatal; after: success. Viewed the Conphrence menu, loaded threads, etc.
Reviewers: amckinley
Reviewed By: amckinley
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D20318
Summary: Ref T13250. See D20149. Mostly: clarify semantics. Partly: remove magic "null" behavior.
Test Plan: Poked around, but mostly just inspection since these are pretty much one-for-one.
Reviewers: amckinley
Reviewed By: amckinley
Subscribers: yelirekim
Maniphest Tasks: T13250
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D20154
Summary:
In ~2012, the first of these options was added because someone who hates dogs and works at Asana also hated `[Differential]` in the subject line. The use case there was actually //removing// the text, not changing it, but I made the prefix editable since it seemed like slightly less of a one-off.
These options are among the dumbest and most useless config options we have and very rarely used, see T11760. A very small number of instances have configured one of these options.
Newer applications stopped providing these options and no one has complained.
You can get the same effect with `translation.override`. Although I'm not sure we'll keep that around forever, it's a reasonable replacement today. I'll call out an example in the changelog to help installs that want to preserve this option.
If we did want to provide this, it should just be in {nav Applications > Settings} for each application, but I think it's wildly-low-value and "hack via translations" or "local patch" are entirely reasonable if you really want to change these strings.
Test Plan: Grepped for `subject-prefix`.
Reviewers: amckinley
Reviewed By: amckinley
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D19993
Summary:
Fixes T7477. Fixes T13066. Currently, inbound mail is processed by the first receiver that matches any "To:" address. "Cc" addresses are ignored.
**To, CC, and Multiple Receivers**
Some users would like to be able to "Cc" addresses like `bugs@` instead of having to "To" the address, which makes perfect sense. That's the driving use case behind T7477.
Since users can To/Cc multiple "create object" or "update object" addresses, I also wanted to make the behavior more general. For example, if you email `bugs@` and also `paste@`, your mail might reasonably make both a Task and a Paste. Is this useful? I'm not sure. But it seems like it's pretty clearly the best match for user intent, and the least-surprising behavior we can have. There's also no good rule for picking which address "wins" when two or more match -- we ended up with "address order", which is pretty arbitrary since "To" and "Cc" are not really ordered fields.
One part of this change is removing `phabricator.allow-email-users`. In practice, this option only controlled whether users were allowed to send mail to "Application Email" addresses with a configured default author, and it's unlikely that we'll expand it since I think the future of external/grey users is Nuance, not richer interaction with Maniphest/Differential/etc. Since this option only made "Default Author" work and "Default Author" is optional, we can simplify behavior by making the rule work like this:
- If an address specifies a default author, it allows public email.
- If an address does not, it doesn't.
That's basically how it worked already, except that you could intentionally "break" the behavior by not configuring `phabricator.allow-email-users`. This is a backwards compatility change with possible security implications (it might allow email in that was previously blocked by configuration) that I'll call out in the changelog, but I suspect that no installs are really impacted and this new behavior is generally more intuitive.
A somewhat related change here is that each receiver is allowed to react to each individual email address, instead of firing once. This allows you to configure `bugs-a@` and `bugs-b@` and CC them both and get two tasks. Useful? Maybe not, but seems like the best execution of intent.
**Sender vs Author**
Adjacently, T13066 described an improvement to error handling behavior here: we did not distinguish between "sender" (the user matching the email "From" address) and "actor" (the user we're actually acting as in the application). These are different when you're some internet rando and send to `bugs@`, which has a default author. Then the "sender" is `null` and the "author" is `@bugs-robot` or whatever (some user account you've configured).
This refines "Sender" vs "Author". This is mostly a purity/correctness change, but it means that we won't send random email error messages to `@bugs-robot`.
Since receivers are now allowed to process mail with no "sender" if they have some default "actor" they would rather use instead, it's not an error to send from an invalid address unless nothing processes the mail.
**Other**
This removes the "abundant receivers" error since this is no longer an error.
This always sets "external user" mail recipients to be unverified. As far as I can tell, there's no pathway by which we send them email anyway (before or after this change), although it's possible I'm missing something somewhere.
Test Plan:
I did most of this with `bin/mail receive-test`. I rigged the workflow slightly for some of it since it doesn't support multiple addresses or explicit "CC" and adding either would be a bit tricky.
These could also be tested with `scripts/mail/mail_handler.php`, but I don't currently have the MIME parser extension installed locally after a recent upgrade to Mojave and suspect T13232 makes it tricky to install.
- Ran unit tests, which provide significant coverage of this flow.
- Sent mail to multiple Maniphest application emails, got multiple tasks.
- Sent mail to a Maniphest and a Paste application email, got a task and a paste.
- Sent mail to a task.
- Saw original email recorded on tasks. This is a behavior particular to tasks.
- Sent mail to a paste.
- Sent mail to a mock.
- Sent mail to a Phame blog post.
- Sent mail to a Legalpad document.
- Sent mail to a Conpherence thread.
- Sent mail to a poll.
- This isn't every type of supported object but it's enough of them that I'm pretty confident I didn't break the whole flow.
- Sent mail to an object I could not view (got an error).
- As a non-user, sent mail to several "create an object..." addresses.
- Addresses with a default user worked (e.g., created a task).
- Addresses without a default user did not work.
Reviewers: amckinley
Reviewed By: amckinley
Maniphest Tasks: T13066, T7477
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D19952
Summary:
Depends on D19919. Ref T11351. This method appeared in D8802 (note that "get...Object" was renamed to "get...Transaction" there, so this method was actually "new" even though a method of the same name had existed before).
The goal at the time was to let Harbormaster post build results to Diffs and have them end up on Revisions, but this eventually got a better implementation (see below) where the Harbormaster-specific code can just specify a "publishable object" where build results should go.
The new `get...Object` semantics ultimately broke some stuff, and the actual implementation in Differential was removed in D10911, so this method hasn't really served a purpose since December 2014. I think that broke the Harbormaster thing by accident and we just lived with it for a bit, then Harbormaster got some more work and D17139 introduced "publishable" objects which was a better approach. This was later refined by D19281.
So: the original problem (sending build results to the right place) has a good solution now, this method hasn't done anything for 4 years, and it was probably a bad idea in the first place since it's pretty weird/surprising/fragile.
Note that `Comment` objects still have an unrelated method with the same name. In that case, the method ties the `Comment` storage object to the related `Transaction` storage object.
Test Plan: Grepped for `getApplicationTransactionObject`, verified that all remaining callsites are related to `Comment` objects.
Reviewers: amckinley
Reviewed By: amckinley
Subscribers: PHID-OPKG-gm6ozazyms6q6i22gyam
Maniphest Tasks: T11351
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D19920
Summary:
Depends on D19918. Ref T11351. In D19918, I removed all calls to this method. Now, remove all implementations.
All of these implementations just `return $timeline`, only the three sites in D19918 did anything interesting.
Test Plan: Used `grep willRenderTimeline` to find callsites, found none.
Reviewers: amckinley
Reviewed By: amckinley
Subscribers: PHID-OPKG-gm6ozazyms6q6i22gyam
Maniphest Tasks: T11351
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D19919
Summary:
Ref T13222. See PHI683. Currently, you can "Change subtype..." via Conduit and the bulk editor, but not via the comment action stack or edit forms.
In PHI683 an install is doing this often enough that they'd like it to become a first-class action. I've generally been cautious about pushing this action to become a first-class action (there are some inevitable rough edges and I don't want to add too much complexity if there isn't a use case for it) but since we have evidence that users would find it useful and nothing has exploded yet, I'm comfortable taking another step forward.
Currently, `EditEngine` has this sort of weird `setIsConduitOnly()` method. This actually means more like "this doesn't show up on forms". Make it better align with that. In particular, a "conduit only" field can already show up in the bulk editor, which is goofy. Change this to `setIsFormField()` and convert/simplify existing callsites.
Test Plan:
There are a lot of ways to reach EditEngine so this probably isn't entirely exhaustive, but I think I got pretty much anything which is likely to break:
- Searched for `setIsConduitOnly()` and `getIsConduitOnly()`, converted all callsites to `setIsFormField()`.
- Searched for `setIsLockable()`, `setIsReorderable()` and `setIsDefaultable()` and aligned these calls to intent where applicable.
- Created an Almanac binding.
- Edited an Almanac binding.
- Created an Almanac service.
- Edited an Almanac service.
- Edited a binding property.
- Deleted a binding property.
- Created and edited a badge.
- Awarded and revoked a badge.
- Created and edited an event.
- Made an event recurring.
- Created and edited a Conpherence thread.
- Edited and updated the diff for a revision.
- Created and edited a repository.
- Created and disabled repository URIs.
- Created and edited a blueprint.
- Created and edited tasks.
- Created a paste, edited/archived a paste.
- Created/edited/archived a package.
- Created/edited a project.
- Made comments.
- Moved tasks on workboards via comment action stack.
- Changed task subtype via comment action stack.
Reviewers: amckinley
Reviewed By: amckinley
Subscribers: PHID-OPKG-gm6ozazyms6q6i22gyam
Maniphest Tasks: T13222
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D19842
Summary: Depends on D19785. Ref T13217. This converts many of the most common clause construction pathways to the new %Q / %LQ / %LO / %LA / %LJ semantics.
Test Plan: Browsed around a bunch, saw fewer warnings and no obvious behavioral errors. The transformations here are generally mechanical (although I did them by hand).
Reviewers: amckinley
Reviewed By: amckinley
Subscribers: hach-que
Maniphest Tasks: T13217
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D19789
Summary:
Depends on D19585. Ref T13164.
Almost all transactions require CAN_EDIT on the object, but they generally do not enforce this directly today. Instead, this is effectively enforced by Controllers, API methods, and EditEngine doing a `CAN_EDIT` check when loading the object to be edited.
A small number of transactions do not require CAN_EDIT, and instead require only a weaker/lesser permission. These are:
- Joining a project which you have CAN_JOIN on.
- Leaving a project which isn't locked.
- Joining a Conpherence thread you can see (today, no separate CAN_JOIN permission for Conpherence).
- Leaving a Conpherence thread.
- Unsubscribing.
- Using the special `!history` command from email.
Additionally, these require CAN_INTERACT, which is weaker than CAN_EDIT:
- Adding comments.
- Subscribing.
- Awarding tokens.
Soon, I want to add "disabling users" to this list, so that you can disable users if you have "Can Disable User" permission, even if you can not otherwise edit users.
It's possible this list isn't exhaustive, so this change might break something by adding a policy check to a place where we previously didn't have one. If so, we can go weaken that policy check to the appropriate level.
Enforcement of these special cases is currently weird:
- We mostly don't actually enforce CAN_EDIT in the Editor; instead, it's enforced before you get to the editor (in EditEngine/Controllers).
- To apply a weaker requirement (like leaving comments or leaving a project), we let you get through the Controller without CAN_EDIT, then apply the weaker policy check in the Editor.
- Some transactions apply a confusing/redundant explicit CAN_EDIT policy check. These mostly got cleaned up in previous changes.
Instead, the new world order is:
- Every transaction has capability/policy requirements.
- The default is CAN_EDIT, but transactions can weaken this explicitly they want.
- So now we'll get requirements right in the Editor, even if Controllers or API endpoints make a mistake.
- And you don't have to copy/paste a bunch of code to say "yes, every transaction should require CAN_EDIT".
Test Plan:
- Tried to add members to a Conpherence thread I could not edit (permissions error).
- Left a Conpherence thread I could not edit (worked properly).
- Joined a thread I could see but could not edit (worked properly).
- Tried to join a thread I could not see (permissions error).
- Implemented `requireCapabilites()` on ManiphestTransactionEditor and tried to edit a task (upgrade guidance error).
- Mentioned an object I can not edit on another object (works).
- Mentioned another object on an object I can not edit (works).
- Added a `{F...}` reference to an object I can not edit (works).
- Awarded tokens to an object I can not edit (works).
- Subscribed/unsubscribed from an object I can not edit (works).
- Muted/unmuted an object I can not edit (works).
- Tried to do other types of edits to an object I can not edit (correctly results in a permissions error).
- Joined and left a project I can not edit (works).
- Tried to edit and add members to a project I can not edit (permissions error).
Reviewers: amckinley
Reviewed By: amckinley
Maniphest Tasks: T13164
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D19586
Summary: Ref T13054. Fixes T12714. Applies read locks to all transactions instead of only a very select subset (chat messages in Conpherence).
Test Plan: See <T13054#235650> for discussion and testing.
Maniphest Tasks: T13054, T12714
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D19059
Summary:
Depends on D19009. Ref T13053. For "Must Encrypt" mail, we must currently strip the "Thread-Topic" header because it sometimes contains sensitive information about the object.
I don't actually know if this header is useful or anyting uses it. My understanding is that it's an Outlook/Exchange thing, but we also implement "Thread-Index" which I think is what Outlook/Exchange actually look at. This header may have done something before we implemented "Thread-Index", or maybe never done anything. Or maybe older versions of Excel/Outlook did something with it and newer versions don't, or do less. So it's possible that an even better fix here would be to simply remove this, but I wasn't able to convince myself of that after Googling for 10 minutes and I don't think it's worth hours of installing Exchange/Outlook to figure out. Instead, I'm just trying to simplify our handling of this header for now, and maybe some day we'll learn more about Exchange/Outlook and can remove it.
In a number of cases we already use the object monogram or PHID as a "Thread-Topic" without users ever complaining, so I think that if this header is useful it probably isn't shown to users, or isn't shown very often (e.g., only in a specific "conversation" sub-view?). Just use the object PHID (which should be unique and stable) as a thread-topic, everywhere, automatically.
Then allow this header through for "Must Encrypt" mail.
Test Plan: Processed some local mail, saw object PHIDs for "Thread-Topic" headers.
Reviewers: amckinley
Maniphest Tasks: T13053
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D19012
Summary: Noticed a couple of typos in the docs, and then things got out of hand.
Test Plan:
- Stared at the words until my eyes watered and the letters began to swim on the screen.
- Consulted a dictionary.
Reviewers: #blessed_reviewers, epriestley
Reviewed By: #blessed_reviewers, epriestley
Subscribers: epriestley, yelirekim, PHID-OPKG-gm6ozazyms6q6i22gyam
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D18693
Summary: Cursory research indicates that "login" is a noun, referring to a form, and "log in" is a verb, referring to the action of logging in. I went though every instances of 'login' I could find and tried to clarify all this language. Also, we have "Phabricator" on the registration for like 4-5 times, which is a bit verbose, so I tried to simplify that language as well.
Test Plan: Tested logging in and logging out. Pages feel simpler.
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: Korvin
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D18322
Summary: Ran across a few straglers. Convert to the correct color.
Test Plan: grep for profile-image-button, check profile image selection page
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: Korvin
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D18096
Summary: Try to dis-ambiguate various button types and colors. Moves `simple` to `phui-button-simple` and moves colors to `button-color`.
Test Plan: Grep for buttons still inline, UIExamples, PHUIX, Herald, and Email Preferences.
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: Korvin
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D18077
Summary: Fixes T12735. Adds a sound if the user is logged out, skips checking a setting.
Test Plan: set participants to null and verify sound plays, no exceptions1111
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: Korvin
Maniphest Tasks: T12735
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D17973
Summary: T12656, mark these methods as frozen and use conpherence.edit instead.
Test Plan: Visit conduit, check status is displayed.
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: Korvin
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D17808
Summary: Builds a basic room generator for Conpherence, picks a random name, adds 10 random users to it, sets view and edit policy to all users.
Test Plan:
`bin/lipsum generate conpherence`
{F4928815}
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: Korvin
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D17699
Summary: Moves Conpherence to use EditEngine. This removes the "First Message" field, but I think that's ok until we have direct messaging of some sort, then maybe have built-ins cover that case.
Test Plan:
- Visit /new/ and /edit/ for creating new rooms.
- Edit a room in full conpherence
- Edit a room in durable column
- grep for METADATA calls
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: Korvin
Maniphest Tasks: T11729
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D16677
Summary: Ref T12622.
Test Plan: As a logged-out and logged-in user, loaded Conpherence threads.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T12622
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D17768
Summary: Fixes T12622. This variable is mis-named.
Test Plan: Visit a room I have not joined.
Reviewers: epriestley, amckinley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: Korvin
Maniphest Tasks: T12622
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D17767
Summary: Fixes T12619.
Test Plan: Faked `return array()` in ConpherneceThreadQuery, got a NUX instead of fatal.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T12619
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D17764
Summary: This adds some basic per user / per room theming for Conpherence, which should hopefully let users identify rooms from just the sidebar color.
Test Plan: Lots of threads with different colors.
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: Korvin
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D17747
Summary: Ref T12591. These preferences are per user and we need to reload the whole UI on a change anyways. Simplifies future expansion.
Test Plan: Option click into new window, set preferences. View in Conpherence, see saved settings, change sound. Hear new sound.
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: Korvin
Maniphest Tasks: T12591
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D17740
Summary: Sets notification and sound preferences in a single array()
Test Plan: Change email preference, save, set sound preference, save. Email preference still OK.
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: Korvin
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D17735
Summary: Moves participants over to ModularTransactions, simplified a lot of the code. Fixes T12550
Test Plan:
Create a new room with just myself and myself + fake accounts.
Remove a person.
Remove myself.
Edit a room, topic.
Type some messages.
???
Profit
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Subscribers: Korvin
Maniphest Tasks: T12550
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D17685
Summary:
Pathway to D17685. We no longer have "behindTransactionPHID", so we no longer need the latest transaction.
This allows some code to be removed.
Test Plan:
- Grepped for callsites to `markUpToDate()` and variables used in the calls.
- Sent messages in a couple threads, viewed them, saw unread counts go away.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D17733
Summary:
Pathway to D17685. This fixes an issue idenified in D17731: if any caller ever queried for more than one participant, some results could get thrown away by re-keying the results on thread PHID: two different participants can be members of the same thread!
This also fixes an issue from D17683, where a `needParticipantCache()` callsite was overlooked.
Test Plan:
- Viewed Conpherence dropdown.
- Sent messages, saw unread count / thread order still work properly.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D17732
Summary:
Pathway to D17685. This column is (mostly) a denormalization of `dateModified` on the thread.
Just use a JOIN instead.
This isn't //exactly// the same: we'll bump threads to the top now for non-message changes (e.g., a topic or title change). That seems fine, but we could put a `lastMessageDate` on Thread later if we want to refine it.
Also got rid of a lot of other unused stuff. There's a big garbage TODO here, I'll fix that in the next change.
Test Plan:
- Grepped for `dateTouched`.
- Grepped for `participantCursor`.
- Grepped for `ConpherenceParticipantQuery::LIMIT`.
- Looked for callsites to `setOrder()`, found none.
- Added a message to an older thread, saw it bump up to the top.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D17731
Summary:
Pathway to D17685. This column is a very complicated cache of: is participant.messageCount equal to thread.messageCount?
We can just ask this question with a JOIN instead and simplify things dramatically.
Test Plan:
- Ran migration.
- Browsed around.
- Sent a message, saw unread count go up.
- Read the message, saw unread count go down.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D17730
Summary: Pathway to D17685. Nothing reads this field and it has no use or value.
Test Plan:
- Ran migration.
- Grepped for `behindTransactionPHID`.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D17729
Summary: A few more mp3s to choose from for Conpherence.
Test Plan: Test each sound in a new room.
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: Korvin
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D17734
Summary: Ref T7567. This adds some constants (for adding new sounds), global setting for turning on and off sound (setting) and per thread preference for sound choice. Also specc'd out Mentions, if added.
Test Plan: I tested all the preference wiring, but need to set up notifications locally to verify if this works. Feel free to test.
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: amckinley, Korvin
Maniphest Tasks: T7567
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D17726
Summary: Check the strlen of topic before adding a tag to the header in Conpherence.
Test Plan: Remove a topic, no longer see indigo bubble.
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: Korvin
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D17715
Summary: Fixes T12556 Uses more common components in ConpherenceThreadList by moving to PHUIListItemView. Reduces clutter by moving privacy into the header. Gets ride of "See More" double interchanges.
Test Plan:
I need to test this more, doesn't seem to auto-select top room any more, also might build a lipsum generator.
- Create lots of rooms with various policies
- Test clicking on policy object
- Click on different rooms
- Post in rooms
- Load up second account, see room numbers
- Clear room message count by clicking on room
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: Korvin
Maniphest Tasks: T12556
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D17698
Summary: Updates the language to use "Remove Participant" instead of "Banish User"
Test Plan: Read through the various cases, test them by removing myself or others
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: Korvin
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D17697
Summary:
I think these got munged when I removed CAN_JOIN.
- If you can view the room, you can join it.
- ~~If you can view the room, you can add others to it.~~ This rule adjustment was removed, see discussion on the revision.
- If you are a participant in the room, you can remove yourself.
- If you can edit a room, you can remove anyone.
Test Plan:
Normal feature set:
- Create a new room that only I can edit, viewable by all users.
- Leave room (bye k thx)
- Create another room, myself only
- Join room from second account
- See ability to only remove myself
- Remove myself
- Rejoin
- Add third account
- Log into first account
- Boot off randos
- Test joining by green button, message, and by + sign.
Policy consistency:
- As a user who can not edit the room, tried to add other members. Received policy exception. The `+` button is currently visible and enabled for all users (even users who have not joined the room) but this is pre-existing.
Reviewers: chad
Subscribers: Korvin
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D17696
Summary: We no longer display this any more in the UI, so go ahead and remove the callsites and db column.
Test Plan: New Room, with and without participants.
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: Korvin
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D17683
Summary: Swaps this transaction over.
Test Plan: Load up a few rooms with date markers, still render as expected.
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: Korvin
Maniphest Tasks: T12550
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D17680
Summary: Fixes T12178, Fixes T11704 Not sure this feature gets any use and I can't find a similar option in other software, so removing it I think simiplifies a number of things. Removes CAN_JOIN and joinable is basically now CAN_VIEW and !$participating. Also removed some old transaction strings for other policies. Don't seem used.
Test Plan: Create a new room, edit room policies, see changes. Log into second account, search for rooms, everything now is visible.
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: Korvin
Maniphest Tasks: T12178, T11704
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D17675
Summary: Does a few things. Turns off feed stories (again), removes "action" transactions from notificiations, and only updates message count on actual messages. This feels a bit cleaner and less spammy... I guess... I think @epriestley will really like it and do me a favor or something.
Test Plan: Pull up two windows. test a message, see message count on second screen. Edit a topic or title, get no notification. At all. Ever.
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: Korvin, epriestley
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D17674
Summary:
Depends on D17669. Ref T12137. Ref T12003. Ref T2632. Ref T7860.
Converts Phabricator to the new parse + compile workflow with intermediate tokens.
Also fixes a bug where searches for `cat"` or similar (unmatched quotes) wouldn't produce a nice exception.
Test Plan:
- Fulltext searched.
- Fulltext searched in Conpherence.
- Fulltext searched with bad syntax.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T12137, T12003, T7860, T2632
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D17670
Summary: Begin converting Conpherence to ModularTransactions, this converts title, topic, and picture to use modular transactions. Participants seems hairy so I'll do that in another diff
Test Plan: Create a room with a topic, change room name, topic. Add people, remove people. Set a room image. Unset topic.
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: Korvin
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D17668
Summary: Fixes T11730. Removes an old transaction that hasn't been used in a year.
Test Plan: Run sql, check various rooms.
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: Korvin
Maniphest Tasks: T11730
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D17666
Summary: Removes this feature, makes creating a room simpler and less confusing.
Test Plan: Create a room on Conpherence.
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: Korvin
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D17661
Summary: Fixes T12138. Test for the presence of being in fullscreen mode, and disable send on enter if present. Side note, I'd love a first class "hasClass" type Javelin function.
Test Plan:
- Go to Conpherence
- Type some smack, see it send on enter
- Go fullscreen like a boss
- Let the words flow
- Close fullscreen, then send on enter.
- (might be nice someday to add a "submit" button to fullscreen editor)
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: Korvin
Maniphest Tasks: T12138
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D17590
