Summary:
Ref T7447. Implements per-viewer comment hiding. Once a comment is obsolete or uninteresting, you can hide it completely.
This is sticky per-user.
My hope is that this will strike a better balance between concerns than some of the other approaches (conservative porting, summarization, hide-all).
Specifically, this adds a new action here:
{F435621}
Clicking it completely collapses the comment into a small icon on the previous line, and saves the comment state as hidden for you:
{F435626}
You can click the icon to reveal all hidden comments below the line.
Test Plan:
- Hid comments.
- Showed comments.
- Created, edited, deleted and submitted comments.
- Used Diffusion comments (hiding is not implemented there yet, but I'd plan to bring it there eventually if it works out in Differential).
Reviewers: btrahan, chad
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: jparise, yelirekim, epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T7447
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D13009
Summary: Ref T7447, these are more work than needed at least on an indivdual basis. JS openning all feels poor as well.
Test Plan: Review comments, past present and future.
Reviewers: btrahan, epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: Korvin, epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T7447
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D12702
Summary: Ref T7447, Ref T1460. Moves "done" state to left, and no longer is a button (simpler CSS). Also feels a little nicer. Clean up some spacing issue with Ghosties.
Test Plan:
Test new and old comments, as author and reviewer.
{F389986}
{F389987}
{F389988}
Reviewers: btrahan, epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: aik099, Korvin, epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T1460, T7447
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D12641
Summary: This is a lighter UI treatment for previous/forward comments, where the comment is just hidden behind a click. This mayyy be too hard to discover, but I'd rather wait and make it more obvious if actually needed. Once you understand the interaction, the cleaner UI is preferable. Ref T7447
Test Plan:
Test a lot of previous and forward comments.
{F389658}
Reviewers: btrahan, epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: Korvin, epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T7447
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D12627
Summary:
Ref T7447. Ref T7870. When you "reply" to a ghost inline, make it work properly.
This exact behavior is arguable. In particular, when you reply to a ghost inline, we //could// put the reply on the same diff as the original.
I suspect it aligns better with user exepectation to put the new inline on the current (visible) diff instead, and generally for inlines to flow forward through time and all of the ghosts to pretty much be older than all of the non-ghosts in most cases. We can see how it feels and adjust things if this turns out to not make sense.
Test Plan:
- Replied to ghost inlines, got new inlines on the proper display line.
- Replied to normal inlines, got normal behavior.
- Made some new inlines.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T7870, T7447
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D12492
Summary:
Ref T7447. This might be overkill, but I want to over-explain things until we have more confidence that this is rarely confusing.
NOTE: I'm playing it a bit fast and loose with `setIsGhost()` (passing a dictionary) because making API changes requires changing the interface and Diffusion, which is a pain. I'll clean this up at the end once the interface is more final. This is well-contained for now.
Test Plan:
- Viewed "base vs 2" in a diff with 3 diffs, saw some "older comments" and some "newer comments".
- Hovered the tags for an explanation of comment spookiness.
{F377703}
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T7447
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D12490
Summary:
Ref T7447. This ports comments forward and backward in the best case:
- The old comment is on a changeset with the same filename.
- The old and new files are pretty much the same, line-for-line.
This will fail to port a lot of comments around and probably port a lot of comments into goofy places. We can see how bad it is in practice.
Errata:
- Design is me cobbling something together, probably worth tweaking.
- "Old Comment" should, at a minimum, say "Newer Comment" sometimes, or we should come up with some better name for this stuff.
Test Plan: {F377214}
Reviewers: chad, btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: johnny-bit, yelirekim, epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T7447
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D12484
Summary: These arrays looks a little odd, most likely due to the autofix applied by `ArcanistXHPASTLinter::LINT_ARRAY_SEPARATOR`. See D12296 in which I attempt to improve the autocorrection from this linter rule.
Test Plan: N/A
Reviewers: epriestley, #blessed_reviewers
Reviewed By: epriestley, #blessed_reviewers
Subscribers: epriestley
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D12281
Summary: Fixes T7720. We currently leak the "draft" state of checkboxes; never treat checkboxes as drafts if you can't mark them.
Test Plan: Checked a box, reloaded page in other browser. Previously, the draft state partially propagated. Now, it no longer does.
Reviewers: btrahan, chad
Reviewed By: chad
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T7720
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D12262
Summary:
Ref T1460. Overall:
- Pass `objectOwnerPHID` consistently.
- Pass viewer consistently.
- Set the correct draft state for checkboxes on the client.
Test Plan:
- Made inline comments in Differential.
- Made inline comments in Diffusion.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T1460
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D12186
Summary:
Rebuilds the UI in Differential commenting. Specifically we look at the following design patterns:
**To the author:**
- The author of the diff should be able to easily identify what comments are done and not done.
- We keep undone comments yellow
- Clicking done turns comment block into 'unsubmitted state'
**To the reviewer:**
- Easier understanding of unsubmitted states
- All conversations to be yellow/important
**Todo**
- Not all color CSS states correct
- Unpulished checkbox support
Test Plan:
Test leaving comments, published and unpublished. Checking Done, unpublished and published. Check delete states.
From the Diff Author's perspective:
{F352094}
For a Diff commenter's perspective:
{F352095}
Reviewers: btrahan, epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: Korvin, epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T1460, T7660, T7503
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D12171
Summary:
This returns the PHID of the current revision owner, or the commit author, if one exists.
NOTE: For drafts, we currently return `null`; I'll fix that in a future change. Should be correct for submitted comments.
Test Plan: Added an inline, nothing seemed broken.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Subscribers: epriestley
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D12185
Summary: Ref T7660. I'm not toggling "inline-state-is-draft" correctly in JS yet since it's a little tricky (you can reload to see it) but the main state should work.
Test Plan:
- Clicked "done", saw comment opacity fade with placeholder style.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T7660
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D12160
Summary:
Ref T1460. When a revision author updates/comments/etc on a revision, publish all their checkmarks.
This doesn't handle Diffusion/audits yet.
Test Plan: {F346870}
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: yelirekim, epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T1460
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D12126
Summary:
Ref T1460. This just barely works, but throwing it up in case any of it sounds mechanically crazy before we build integrations/UI/etc.
Specifically, these are the behaviors:
- You can mark your own draft comments as "done" before you submit them. The intent is to let reviewers mark their stuff advisory/minor/not-important before they submit it, to hint to authors that they don't expect the feedback to necessarily be addressed (maybe it's a joke, maybe it's just discussion, maybe it's "consider..").
- You can mark others' published comments as "done" if you're the revision/commit author. The intent is to keep this lightweight by not requiring an audit trail of who marked what done when. If anyone could mark anything done, we'd have to have some way to show who marked stuff.
- When you mark stuff done (or unmark it), it goes into a "draft" state, where you see the change but others don't see it yet. The intent is twofold:
- Be consistent with how inlines work.
- Allow us to publish a "epriestley updated this revision + epriestley marked 15 inlines as done" story later if we want. This seems more useful than publishing 15 "epriestley marked one thing as done" stories.
- The actual bit where done-ness publishes isn't implemented.
- UI is bare bones.
- No integration with the rest of the UI yet.
Test Plan: Clicked some checkboxes.
Reviewers: chad, btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: paulshen, chasemp, epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T1460
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D12033
Summary:
Ref T2009. Ref T1460.
Fixes T2618. When users hit "Delete" on inline comments, delete immediately and offer them "Undo". If they delete indirectly (e.g., by clicking "Delete" from the preview at the bottom of the page), we still prompt them, because the "Undo" action either won't be available or may not be easy to find. This is a "refdelete".
Fixes T6464. This was just a mess. Make it not as much of a mess. It should work now. Pretty sure.
Fixes T4999. We did not refresh these links often enough to find targets for them, so they could race with content. Reevaluate them after loading new changes.
Test Plan:
- Deleted and undid deletion of inlines from main view and preview.
- Clicked "View" on inlines.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T6464, T4999, T2618, T1460, T2009
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D12032
Summary:
Ref T2009. Ref T1460. The way Diffusion and Differential load inlines is horrible garbage right now:
- Differential does an ad-hoc query to get the PHIDs, then does a real load to policy check.
- Diffusion completely fakes things. In practice this is not a policy violation, but it's dangerous.
Make TransactionCommentQuery extensible so we can subclass it and get the query building correctly in the right Query layer.
Specifically, the Diffusion and Differential subclasses of this Query will add appropriate `withX()` methods to let us express the query in SQL.
Test Plan: Loaded, previewed, edited, and submitted inlines in Differential and Diffusion
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T2009, T1460
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D12026
Summary:
Ref T1460. Ref T2618.
When publishing a draft inline, mark the inline it replies to (if any) as replied to.
Also, don't load deleted comments as drafts (sets the stage for T2618).
I'll make an effort to clean up the loading mess here in the next revision, and find some more appropriate home for the shared code.
Test Plan: Made and replied to comments in Differential and Diffusion. Saw comments get marked as "Has Replies" and "Is Reply".
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T2618, T1460
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D12025
Summary: Ref T2009. These subclasses have a mixture of similar methods, move them all to the base class.
Test Plan: Created/edited/undo/submitted comments on the left and right sides of a diff.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T2009
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D12024
Summary:
Ref T2009. This is another almost-identical copy of the row scaffolding, which has the same 1up/2up bugs as the 8 other copies of this code.
Turn the "undo" element into an InlineCommentView so we can scaffold it.
Then, scaffold it with the same code as everything else.
Test Plan: Hit "Undo", swapped from 1up to 2up, hit "undo" again, swapped back, tried left/right, everything rendered with proper scaffolding.
Reviewers: btrahan, chad
Reviewed By: chad
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T2009
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D12019
Summary: Ref T2009. This has two more copies of the scaffolding.
Test Plan: Created, edited, deleted, replied to inline comments.
Reviewers: btrahan, chad
Reviewed By: chad
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T2009
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D12018
Summary:
Ref T1460. Track and store which comments are threaded replies to other comments, vs merely appearing on the same lines.
This doesn't actually write `hasReplies` yet, since that needs to happen when we un-draft comments on submission.
Test Plan: Made inline comments in Differential and Diffusion, including replies. Replies were marked as "Is Reply".
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T1460
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D12017
Summary:
Ref T2009. Currently, the code figures out if a comment is on the left or right by looking at the `<th />` preceeding the enclosing `<td />`.
This gets the right result in 2-up, but in 1-up rows are always `<th />`, `<th />`, `<td />`, so it always detects every inline as being in the new file.
Because "old" and "new" cells aren't inherently distingushable in the 1up view, we can't use a DOM test for this at all. Instead, just track this state explicitly.
Test Plan:
- Made left/right comments in 1up view and 2up view.
- Viewed them in 1up and 2up views.
- Hovered in 1up and 2up views.
- Diff-of-diff'd and reviewed old/new comments, then made some more.
Reviewers: btrahan, chad
Reviewed By: chad
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T2009
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D12011
Summary: Ref T2009. Remove the 4 (!!) copies of this code.
Test Plan:
- Added, edited, and removed inline comments in 2up view.
- Stacked a bunch of comments on the same line and saw the JS place them correctly.
- Created an image diff and added, edited and removed inlines on it.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T2009
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D12000
Summary:
Ref T2009. Inline comments have "scaffolding", which is basically some empty table cells/rows around them to get the layout correct.
The scaffolding depends on the renderer, since the cells are different for side-by-side vs unified diffs.
This is currently duplicated all over the place:
- Edit view has 1up/2up.
- Detail view has 1up/2up.
- 1up renderer has 1up.
- 2up renderer has four separate copies of the 2up logic.
These all have subtle differences, which are mostly bugs. Start making the scaffolding more composable so we can get rid of that mess.
Test Plan: Added, edited, and removed inline comments on unified and side-by-side diffs.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T2009
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D11997
Summary:
Ref T2009. These classes are "Differential" now, but are used elsewhere in diff infrastructure (e.g., Diffusion).
- Rename them to "PHUIDiff".
- Move them to "src/infrastructure/".
- Give them a base class.
Test Plan: Interacted with inlines in unified and side-by-side views.
Reviewers: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T2009
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D11996
Summary:
Ref T2009. This reduces how buggy inlines are. They're still buggy.
Specifically, the inline endpoint didn't know how to scaffold inlines before, so some of them ended up rendering in the wrong rows or breaking layouts.
This passes the current renderer through to the inline editor endpoint, so it can at least get the layout correct.
Test Plan: Interacted with inlines in unified and side-by-side views.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T2009
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D11988
Summary: Minor spring cleaning, improve the visual feel of the comments table, more consistent structure.
Test Plan:
Test multiple comments, long comments, short comments, and multiple lines.
{F282462}
Reviewers: btrahan, epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: hach-que, Korvin, epriestley
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D11666
Summary: Fixes T6790. Turn the old method into "new" (old signature) and "newEphemeral". Deploy "newEphemeral" as many places as possible; basically places we are not in the Differential application *and* have no intentions of ever saving the diff. These callsites are also all places we are just trying to get some changesets at the end of the day.
Test Plan: set differential application policy to 'administrators only'. viewed a commit in diffusion and it worked without any errors! i'm just using my thinkin' noodle on the other code paths.
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: Korvin, epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T6790
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D11020
Summary: Fixes T6152, T6237. This introduces a viewPolicy column to the DifferentialDiff, and re-jiggers the DifferentialDiff policy implementation such that things behave as before once associated with a revision, else use the DifferentialDiff policy column value.
Test Plan: made a diff with a non-standard view policy and noted that policy was still selected in the revision step. arc lint.
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: Korvin, epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T6237, T6152
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10875
Summary:
Full screen is a little foobar so disabling it for inline comments
Fixes T5272
Test Plan:
View inline comment after change, make sure full screen option
has gone.
Reviewers: epriestley, #blessed_reviewers
Reviewed By: epriestley, #blessed_reviewers
Subscribers: epriestley, Korvin
Maniphest Tasks: T5272
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D9579
Summary:
Moderize Inline Comment Display
- Use standard colors
- Better display with/without comment
- OMG Icons
Test Plan:
{F148256}
Test with and without main comment, test with many for few comments on 1-3 files.
Reviewers: epriestley, btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley, Korvin
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D8885
Summary: Better aligns the text area when leaving an inline comment. Also, phts
Test Plan: reload page, view new padding.
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: Korvin, epriestley, aran
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D8370
Summary: Ref T2222. Ref T1790. I partially modernized this recently, but bring it to the mail version too.
Test Plan: See screenshots.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: zeeg, aran
Maniphest Tasks: T1790, T2222
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D8294
Summary: ...do it somewhat generically, so we could fairly easily add this to other applications. Fixes T3496. I got a wee bit lazy and decided not to migrate existing drafts. My excuses aside from laziness are doing it this way will let us see if anyone complains, we can always do a migration later if people do complain, and there's likely to be a lot of garbage data for older / bigger installs, and the migration didn't seem worth itgiven it would also likely be expensive in these cases.
Test Plan: made a draft inline comment on DX and observed DX had a note icon on Differential home page. made a draft comment on DX and observed DX had a note icon on Differential home page. deleted a draft inline comment and noted icon disappeared from Differential homepage. Submitted a draft comment + inline comment and noted icon disappeared.
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: Korvin, epriestley, aran
Maniphest Tasks: T3496
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D8275
Summary: Fixes T4317. Update the "inline comment" control to a RemarkupControl. This could maybe use some padding/spacing/design touches eventually but seems OK for the moment.
Test Plan: {F101825}
Reviewers: chad, btrahan
Reviewed By: chad
CC: chad, aran
Maniphest Tasks: T4317
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D7969
Test Plan: This is one of the rare moments where unit tests for views would be useful.
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: Korvin, epriestley, aran
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D7547
Summary: Sgrepped for `"=~/</"` and manually changed every HTML.
Test Plan: This doesn't work yet but it is hopefully one of the last diffs before Phabricator will be undoubtedly HTML safe.
Reviewers: epriestley
CC: aran, Korvin
Maniphest Tasks: T2432
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D4927
Summary:
This is pretty brutal and it adds some `phutil_safe_html()`.
But it is a big step in the right direction.
Test Plan: None.
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: aran, Korvin
Maniphest Tasks: T2432
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D4905
