Summary:
For most actions (like "accept"), we write a row only if you aren't acting on behalf of anything else. This avoids cases like every accept causing two relationships:
Some Project | Accept
Some User | Accept
For "Resign", we must always write the row. Break the logic out and handle it separately.
Test Plan: Poked it locally, but let me know if this fixes things?
Reviewers: 20after4, btrahan
Reviewed By: 20after4
CC: aran
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D2423
Test Plan:
Added CC's/Auditors, clicked the form elements, and saw correct
behaviour. Verified that metadata was present in the detail table.
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: aran, epriestley, 20after4, Koolvin
Maniphest Tasks: T904
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D2002
Summary:
- Add an explicit multiplexing option, and enable it by default. This is necessary for Mail.app to coexist with other clients ("Re:" breaks outlook at the very least, and generally sucks in the common case), and allows users with flexible clients to enable subject variance.
- Add an option for subject line variance. Default to not varying the subject, so mail no longer says [Committed], [Closed], etc. This is so the defaults thread correctly in Gmail (not entirely sure this actually works).
- Add a preference to enable subject line variance.
- Unless all mail is multiplexed, don't enable or respect the "Re" or "vary subject" preferences. These are currently shown and respected in non-multiplex cases, which creates inconsistent results.
NOTE: @jungejason @nh @vrana This changes the default behavior (from non-multiplexing to multiplexing), and might break Facebook's integration. You should be able to keep the same behavior by setting the options appropriately, although if you can get the new defaults working they're probably better.
Test Plan:
Send mail from Maniphest, Differential and Audit. Updated preferences. Enabled/disabled multiplexing. Things seem OK?
NOTE: I haven't actually been able to repro the Gmail threading issue so I'm not totally sure what's going on there, maybe it started respecting "Re:" (or always has), but @cpiro and @20after4 both reported it independently. This fixes a bunch of bugs in any case and gives us more conservative set of defaults.
I'll see if I can buff out the Gmail story a bit but every client is basically a giant black box of mystery. :/
Reviewers: btrahan, vrana, jungejason, nh
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: cpiro, 20after4, aran
Maniphest Tasks: T1097, T847
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D2206
Summary: NOTE: This is not produced by a script so there might be errors. Please review carefully.
Test Plan: Browse around Differential.
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: aran
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D2103
Summary:
- The UI is pretty straightforward, since Handle just works (tm)
- Added two methods to the owners object to handle the new layer of
indirection. Then ran git grep PhabricatorOwnersOwner and changed
callsites as appropriate.
Sending this to get a round of feedback before I test the non-trivial
changes in this diff.
Test Plan:
- owners tool: edit, view, list for basic functionality.
- phlog for the two new methods I added
Reviewers: epriestley, blair, jungejason
CC: aran
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D2079
Summary: NOTE: This is not produced by a script so there might be errors. Please review carefully.
Test Plan: Browse around.
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: aran
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D2091
Summary: We may overwrite $comment as a side effect of iteration.
Test Plan: Made some audit comments as different users.
Reviewers: vrana, btrahan
Reviewed By: vrana
CC: aran, epriestley
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D2050
Summary:
See some discussion in D2002. Add two new actions:
- Resign: (auditor only) closes your open request (user request ONLY) by putting it in a "resigned" state.
- Close: (author only) closes all open requests by putting them in a "closed" state.
@davidreuss, this is probably conflict-city with D2002 -- I'll wait for you to land first and then handle the merge on my end.
Test Plan: Resigned from and closed audits.
Reviewers: 20after4, davidreuss, btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran, epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T904
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D2013
Summary:
Depends on D1929. In emails, notify recipients that inlines are attached.
Vaguely copy/pastey from Differential but they only share like six lines and this seems like a random piece of code to pull out.
Test Plan: Added inline comments, got email mentioning them
Reviewers: davidreuss, nh, btrahan
Reviewed By: davidreuss
CC: aran, epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T904
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D1930
Summary:
- Add inline comments to Audits, like Differential.
- Creates new storage for the comments in the Audits database.
- Creates a new PhabricatorAuditInlineComment class, similar to DifferentialInlineComment.
- Defines an Interface which Differential and Audit comments conform to.
- Makes consumers of DifferentialInlineComments consume objects which implement that interface instead.
- Adds save
NOTE: Some features are still missing! Wanted to cut this off before it got crazy:
- Inline comments aren't shown in the main comment list.
- Inline comments aren't shown in the emails.
- Inline comments aren't previewed.
I'll followup with those but this was getting pretty big.
@vrana, does the SQL change look correct?
Test Plan:
- Created, edited, deleted, replied to, reloaded and saved inline comments in Diffusion, on the left and right side of diffs.
- Created, edited, deleted, replied to, reloaded and saved inline comments in Differentila, on the left and right side of primary and diff-versus-diff diffs.
Reviewers: btrahan, vrana
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran, epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T904
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D1898
Summary:
- Move table to Repository, since we have no Owners joins in the application anymore but would like to do a Repository join.
- Rename "packagePHID" to "auditorPHID", since this column may contain package, project, or user PHIDs.
Test Plan:
- Browsed Owners, Audit, and Differential interfaces to the Audit tool.
- Made comments and state changes.
- Ran "reparse.php --herald --owners" on several commits.
Reviewers: btrahan, jungejason
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran, epriestley, nh, vrana
Maniphest Tasks: T904
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D1787
Summary:
- Users may elect to receive an initial notification about a commit; allow it to be replied to in order to interact with the object.
- Share thread headers between emails.
- Add the "REPLY HANDLER ACTIONS" section to both emails.
Test Plan:
- Used "reparse.php --herald" to trigger herald emails, verified reply-to and email body.
- Made audit comments, verified body.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran, epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T904
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D1762
Summary:
- Add a proper mailKey field to make these things mailable. Backfill all
existing objects.
- Denormalize authorPHID to the commit object so we can query by it
efficiently in a future diff. We currently use the search engine to drive
"commits by author" but that's not so good for audit, which needs more
constraints.
- Add an overall audit status field so we can efficiently query "commits that
needs your attention".
- Add enough code to convince myself that these fields are basically
reasonable and work correctly.
Test Plan:
- Ran schema upgrades. Checked database state afterward.
- Ran "reparse.php --owners --herald" to verify worker changes.
- Looked at a commit, altered aggregate status via audits / reparse.php,
verified it responded correctly.
Reviewers: btrahan, jungejason
Reviewed By: jungejason
CC: aran, epriestley, nh
Maniphest Tasks: T904
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D1706
Summary:
When users submit an audit, send email to relevant parties informing them.
Allow email to be replied to. Just basic support so far; no "!raise" stuff and
no threading with the Herald commit notification.
Test Plan: Made comments, got email. Replied to email, got comments.
Reviewers: btrahan, jungejason
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran, epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T904
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D1698
Summary:
If a user comments on a commit but they don't currently have any audits they're
authoritative on, create a new one.
This makes it easier to handle other things more consistently, like figuring out
the overall audit status of a commit and who should get emails.
Test Plan: Made comments on commits I had authority on and did not have
authority on.
Reviewers: btrahan, jungejason
Reviewed By: jungejason
CC: aran, epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T904
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D1697
Summary: Add audit information to the commit search index.
Test Plan: Updated a commit, searched for terms in its comments, got hits.
Reviewers: btrahan, jungejason
Reviewed By: jungejason
CC: aran, epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T904
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D1696
Summary: When a user posts an action in the audit tool, publish it to feed.
Test Plan: Made some comments, saw them show up in feed.
Reviewers: btrahan, jungejason
Reviewed By: jungejason
CC: aran, epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T904
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D1695
Summary:
Allows you to write a commit rule that triggers an audit by a user (personal
rules) or a project (global rules).
Mostly this is trying to make auditing more lightweight and accessible in
environments where setting up Owners packages doesn't make sense.
For instance, Disqus wants a rule like "trigger an audit for everything that
didn't have a Differential revision". While not necessarily scalable, this is a
perfectly reasonable rule for a small company, but a lot of work to implement
with Owners (and you'll get a lot of collateral damage if you don't make every
committer a project owner).
Instead, they can create a project called 'Unreviewed Commits' and write a rule
like:
- When: Differential revision does not exist
- Action: Trigger an Audit for project: "Unreviewed Commits"
Then whoever cares can join that project and they'll see those audits in their
queue, and when they approve/raise on commits their actions will affect the
project audit.
Similarly, if I want to look at all commits that match some other rule (say,
XSS) but only want to do it like once a month, I can just set up an audit rule
and go through the queue when I feel like it.
NOTE: This abuses the 'packagePHID' field to also store user and project PHIDs.
Through the magic of handles, this (apparently) works fine for now; I'll do a
big schema patch soon but have several other edits I want to make at the same
time.
Also:
- Adds an "active" fiew for /audit/, eventually this will be like the
Differential "active" view (stuff that is relevant to you right now).
- On commits, highlight triggered audits you are responsible for.
Test Plan: Added personal and global audit triggers to Herald, reparsed some
commits with --herald, got audits. Browsed all audit interfaces to make sure
nothing exploded. Viewed a commit where I was responsible for only some audits.
Performed audits and made sure the triggers I am supposed to be responsible for
updated properly.
Reviewers: btrahan, jungejason
Reviewed By: jungejason
CC: aran, epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T904
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D1690
Summary:
This is intended to supplant the existing "audit edit" interface. I've changed
them to both drive down the same write pathway, but the UIs are still different.
I'll fully merge them in a future diff.
Add a comment box (like Maniphest and Differential) to Diffusion. When users
make comments, their comments appear on the commit. Any audits triggers they are
responsible for are updated to reflect actions they take, as well.
Currently, audits can only be triggered by packages, but I intend to allow them
to be triggered by users and projects (via herald rules) in an upcoming diff.
Thus some of the language like "projects, users or packages" when the code is
clearly dealing only with "packagePHID".
Test Plan: Made audit updates via commit interface and via existing edit
interface. Verified both interfaces updated correctly, and that audit
responsibility rules were applied properly.
Reviewers: btrahan, jungejason
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran, epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T904
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D1688
