Summary:
This commit doesn't change license of any file. It just makes the license implicit (inherited from LICENSE file in the root directory).
We are removing the headers for these reasons:
- It wastes space in editors, less code is visible in editor upon opening a file.
- It brings noise to diff of the first change of any file every year.
- It confuses Git file copy detection when creating small files.
- We don't have an explicit license header in other files (JS, CSS, images, documentation).
- Using license header in every file is not obligatory: http://www.apache.org/dev/apply-license.html#new.
This change is approved by Alma Chao (Lead Open Source and IP Counsel at Facebook).
Test Plan: Verified that the license survived only in LICENSE file and that it didn't modify externals.
Reviewers: epriestley, davidrecordon
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: aran, Korvin
Maniphest Tasks: T2035
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D3886
Summary: We want to allow a broader access to our installation but we need to check the request in that case.
Test Plan:
Created a simple `PhabricatorRequestChecker` returning a custom controller.
Verified that this controller is used when accessing any page.
Returned `null` from this checker and verified that all 209 Phabricator pages are accessible.
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: scottmac, aran, Korvin, btrahan
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D2488
Summary:
This does a few things:
- Allows you to flag pastes. This is straightforward.
- Allows Applications to register event listeners.
- Makes object action lists emit a 'didrenderactions' event, so other applications can add more actions. The Flags application injects its action in this way. This should generally make it much easier to add actions to objects when we add new applications, with less code duplication and better modularity. We have a really hacky version of this in Differential that I want to get rid of in lieu of this more general approach. I'm going to make object lists do the same thing, so any application can jump in and add stuff.
Test Plan: Flagged and unflagged pastes. Viewed home page, differential, flags list.
Reviewers: vrana, btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D3377
Summary:
Currently, we have this cumbersome `PhabricatorRepositoryCommitMessageDetailParser` hook. This is really old and outdated; I want to just use the Differential custom field parser. See T945 for a specific application.
However, it allows installs to override author/committer association. Instead, provide an event hook for doing this.
Test Plan: Added a listener, made every commit resolve to "turtle", parsed some commits, verified the events looked sane and they now correctly were all attributed to "turtle".
Reviewers: btrahan, vrana, nh
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T1337
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D3040
Summary:
- See D2741.
- When EdgeEditor performs edits, emit events.
- Listen for Maniphest edge events and save the changes as transactions.
- Do all this in a reasonably generic way that won't take too much rewriting as we use edges more generally.
Test Plan: Attached and detached commits from tasks, saw reasonable-looking transactions spring into existence.
Reviewers: btrahan, davidreuss
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D2906
Summary:
- `kill_init.php` said "Moving 1000 files" - I hope that this is not some limit in `FileFinder`.
- [src/infrastructure/celerity] `git mv utils.php map.php; git mv api/utils.php api.php`
- Comment `phutil_libraries` in `.arcconfig` and run `arc liberate`.
NOTE: `arc diff` timed out so I'm pushing it without review.
Test Plan:
/D1234
Browsed around, especially in `applications/repository/worker/commitchangeparser` and `applications/` in general.
Auditors: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T1103
Summary:
This event is fired after a task is created and assigned with an id.
Use case is sending an email notification to everyone in a project when a new task is
submitted to said project.
Test Plan:
Implement the event listener, submit a new task to a project, see if the project members
receive an email notification. I will submit the event handler in a separate diff once it's a bit
prettier and tested more thoroughly.
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: aran, jungejason
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D2159
Summary: Last of the big final patches. Left a few debatable classes (12 out of about 400) that I'll deal with individually eventually.
Test Plan: Ran testEverythingImplemented.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran, epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T795
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D1881
Test Plan:
Created a listener that adds some patterns to $matches array, reloaded
Differential, some changesets were not shown as generated.
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: aran, epriestley, mareksapota
Differential Revision: 1200
Summary:
Move event framework from Phabricator to libphutil so it can be used in other
phutil projects, such as Arcanist.
Test plan:
Use along with path to libphutil, events should work as expected.
Reviewers: epriestley
Differential Revision: 1098
Summary: Allow tweaking Differential mail before sending.
Test Plan:
Wrote a listener renaming Differential attachments and it worked without
problems.
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: aran, epriestley, mareksapota, davidreuss
Differential Revision: 1091
Summary: Shows events which a page dispatched, plus all the registered
listeners.
Test Plan:
Pretty basic for now, but works OK:
https://secure.phabricator.com/file/view/PHID-FILE-49fcd23081ce55cf9369/
(I also made it dispatch some dummy events to verify they show up.)
Reviewers: aran
Reviewed By: aran
CC: aran
Differential Revision: 973
Summary:
This is an attempt to satisfy a lot of the one-off requests a little more
generally, by providing a relatively generic piece of event architecture.
Allow the registation of event listeners which can react to various application
events (currently, task editing).
I'll doc this a bit better but I wanted to see if anyone had massive objections
to doing this or the broad approach. The specific problem I want to address is
that one client wants to do a bunch of routing for tasks via email, so it's
either build a hook, or have them override most of ManiphestReplyHandler, or
something slightly more general like this.
Test Plan: Wrote a silly listener that adds "Quack!" to a task every time it is
edited and edited some tasks. I was justly rewarded.
Reviewers: nh, jungejason, tuomaspelkonen, aran
Reviewed By: aran
CC: aran, epriestley
Differential Revision: 881
