Summary: Ref T13222. Ref T12588. See PHI683. To make "Create Subtask..." fancier, we need slightly more logic around subtype maps. Upgrade the plain old array into a proper object so it can have relevant methods, notably "get a list of valid child subtypes for some parent subtype".
Test Plan: Created and edited tasks, changed task subtypes. Grepped for affected symbols (`newEditEngineSubtypeMap`, `newSubtypeMap`).
Reviewers: amckinley
Reviewed By: amckinley
Maniphest Tasks: T13222, T12588
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D19852
Summary:
Ref T13099. Ref T12787. See PHI417. Differential has new "irresponsible" warnings in the timeline somewhat recently, but these publish feed stories that don't link to the revision or have other relevant details, so they're confusing on the balance.
These have a high strength so they render on top, but we actually just want to hide them from the feed and let "abraham closed Dxyz by committing rXzzz." be the primary story.
Modularize things more so that we can get this behavior. Also, respect `shouldHideForFeed()` at display time, not just publishing time.
Test Plan: Used `bin/differential attach-commit` on a non-accepted revision to "irresponsibly land" a revision. Verified that feed story now shows "closed by commit" instead of "closed irresponsibly".
Maniphest Tasks: T13099, T12787
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D19179
Summary:
Depends on D19037. Ref T4434. Adds closed date to `maniphest.search` and "Export Data".
When a task has been closed, show the closed date with a checkmark in the UI instead of the modified date.
Test Plan:
- Exported data to CSV, saw close information.
- Saw close information in `/maniphest/`.
- Queried for close information via `maniphest.search`.
Maniphest Tasks: T4434
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D19038
Summary:
Ref T4434. Although some of the use cases for this data are better fits for Facts, this data is reasonable to track separately.
I have an approximate view of it already ("closed, ordered by date modified") that's useful to review things that were fixed recently. This lets us make that view more effective.
This just adds (and populates) the storage. Followups will add Conduit, Export, Search, and UI support.
This is slightly tricky because merges work oddly (see T13020).
Test Plan:
- Ran migration, checked database for sensible results.
- Created a task in open/closed status, got the right database values.
- Modified a task to close/open it, got the right values.
- Merged an open task, got updates.
Maniphest Tasks: T4434
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D19037
Summary:
Depends on D19012. Ref T13053. In D19012, I've changed "Thread-Topic" to always use PHIDs.
This change drops the selective on-object storage we have to track the original, human-readable title for objects.
Even if we end up backing out the "Thread-Topic" change, we'd be better off storing this in a table in the Mail app which just has `<objectPHID, first subject we used when sending mail for that object>`, since then we get the right behavior without needing every object to have this separate field.
Test Plan: Grepped for `original`, `originalName`, `originalTitle`, etc.
Reviewers: amckinley
Maniphest Tasks: T13053
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D19013
Summary:
See brief discussion in D18554. All the index tables are the same for every application (and, at this point, seem unlikely to change) and we never actually pass these objects around (they're only used internally).
In some other cases (like Transactions) not every application has the same tables (for example, Differential has extra field for inline comments), and/or we pass the objects around (lots of stuff uses `$xactions` directly).
However, in this case, and in Edges, we don't interact with any representation of the database state directly in much of the code, and it doesn't change from application to application.
Just automatically define document, field, and ngram tables for anything which implements `FerretInterface`. This makes the query and index logic a tiny bit messier but lets us delete a ton of boilerplate classes.
Test Plan: Indexed objects, searched for objects. Same results as before with much less code. Ran `bin/storage upgrade`, got a clean bill of health.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T12819
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D18559
Summary:
Ref T12819. I gave this stuff a sweet code name because all the terms related to "fulltext" and "search" already mean 5 different things. It, uh, ferrets out documents for you?
I'm building this to work a lot like the existing ngram index, which seems to work pretty well. If this sticks, it will auto-resolve the join issue (in T12443) by letting us do the entire thing locally in a JOIN and thus dodge a lot of mess.
This index gets built alongside other indexes, but only shows up in the UI if you have prototypes enabled. If you do, it appears under the existing fulltext field in Maniphest. No existing functionality is affected or disrupted.
NOTE: The query engine half of this is still EXTREMELY primitive, and this probably performs worse than the existing field for now. If this doesn't show obvious signs of being awful on `secure` I'll improve that in followup changes.
Test Plan:
Indexed my tasks, ran some simple queries, got the results I wanted, even for queries "ko", "k", "v0.1".
{F5147746}
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T12819, T12443
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D18484
Summary:
Ref T12124. This is a fairly narrow fix for existing saved EditEngine forms with a default priority value.
These saved forms have a numeric (or probably "string-numeric") default value, like "50". They lost their meaning after D18111, when "50" no longer appears in the dropdown. Instead, these forms all select the highest available priority.
At time of writing, this form was broken on this install, for example:
> https://secure.phabricator.com/transactions/editengine/maniphest.task/view/13/
Additionally, `/task/edit/form/123/?priority=...` (for templating forms) stopped working with `priority=50`. This isn't nearly as important, but a larger and more sudden compatiblity break than we need to make.
Add support for an "alias map" on `<select />` controls, so if the value comes in with something we don't recognize we'll treat it like some other value. Then alias all the numeric constants -- and other keywords -- to the right constants.
This ended up only affecting the `<select />` control in the web UI.
Test Plan:
- On `stable`, created a form with "Priority: Low".
- Before patch: form has "Priority: Unbreak Now!" on `master`.
- After patch: form has "Priority: Low" again.
- Used `?priority=25`, `?priority=wish`, `?priority=wishlist` to template forms: all forms worked.
Reviewers: amckinley, chad
Reviewed By: amckinley
Maniphest Tasks: T12124
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D18134
Summary: Fixes T12124. Changes `ManiphestEditEngine` to populate the select using priority keywords instead of the integer value. Marks `maniphest.querystatuses` as frozen. Adds a new Conduit method for fetching potential task statuses.
Test Plan: Created tasks and changed their priorities, observed that transactions in the DB still have the same type (integers as strings). Invoked `maniphest.update` with `priority => '90'` and observed that it still works. Invoked `maniphest.edit` with `priority => 'unbreak'` and observed that it now works.
Reviewers: #blessed_reviewers, epriestley
Reviewed By: #blessed_reviewers, epriestley
Subscribers: Korvin, epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T12124
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D18111
Summary: Fixes T12787. Modular Transactions don't actually support `shouldHideForFeed()`. I'll add some discussion to the task.
Test Plan: Created a subtask, saw no more "X reopened Y, a subtask of P" feed story.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T12787
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D18058
Summary:
Ref T12314. Open to counterdiffs / iterating / suggestions / skipping most or all of this, mostly just throwing this out there as a maybe-reasonable first pass.
When a task has a subtype (like "Plant" or "Animal"), provide some hints on the task list, workboards, and task detail.
To make these hints more useful, allow subtypes to have icons and colors.
Also use these icons and colors in the typeahead tokens.
The current rule is that we show the subtype if it's not the default subtype. Another rule we could use is "show the subtype if there's more than one subtype defined", but my guess is that most installs will mostly have something like "normal task" as the default subtype.
Test Plan:
The interfaces this affects are: task detail view, task list view, workboard cards, subtype typeahead.
{F3539128}
{F3539144}
{F3539167}
{F3539185}
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Subscribers: johnny-bit, bbrdaric, benwick, fooishbar
Maniphest Tasks: T12314
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D17451
Summary:
Ref T12509. Many of the calls to HMAC+SHA1 are just to compute cachekeys for remarkup objects.
Make these use HMAC+SHA256 instead. There is no downside to swapping these since they just cause a cache miss in the worst case.
I also plan to get rid of `PhabricatorMarkupInterface` eventually, but this doesn't go that far.
Test Plan: Browsed some different types of documents (tasks, legalpad documents, phame blogs / posts, pholio mocks, etc).
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T12509
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D17631
Summary:
Fixes T12461. This returns the field as a dictionary with a `"raw"` value, so we could eventually do this if we want without breaking the API:
```
{
"type": "remarkup",
"raw": "**raw**",
"html": "<strong>raw</strong>",
"text": "raw"
}
```
Test Plan: Called `maniphest.search`, reviewed output.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T12461
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D17603
Summary:
Fixes T12378. Two minor issues here:
- CAN_INTERACT on tasks uses "USER", but should just use the view policy, which may be more permissive ("PUBLIC").
- CAN_INTERACT is currently prevented from being "PUBLIC" by additional safeguards. Define an explicit capability object for the permission which returns `true` from `shouldAllowPublicPolicySetting()`.
Test Plan:
- Viewed an unlocked task as a logged-out user, saw "login to comment" instead of "locked".
- Viewed a locked task as a logged-out user, saw "locked".
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T12378
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D17485
Summary:
Ref T12335. See that task for discussion. Here are the behavioral changes:
- Statuses can be flagged with `locked`, which means that tasks in that status are locked to further discussion and interaction.
- A new "CAN_INTERACT" permission facilitates this. For most objects, "CAN_INTERACT" is just the same as "CAN_VIEW".
- For tasks, "CAN_INTERACT" is everyone if the status is a normal status, and no one if the status is a locked status.
- If a user doesn't have "Interact" permission:
- They can not submit the comment form.
- The comment form is replaced with text indicating "This thing is locked.".
- The "Edit" workflow prompts them.
This is a mixture of advisory and hard policy checks but sholuld represent a reasonable starting point.
Test Plan: Created a new "Locked" status, locked a task. Couldn't comment, saw lock warning, saw lock prompt on edit. Unlocked a task.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T12335
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D17453
Summary:
Ref T12314. If you set a form to have the "plant" subtype, then create a task with it, save "plant" as the task subtype.
For Conduit, the default subtype is used by default, but a new "subtype" transaction is exposed. You can apply this transaction at create time to create an object of a certain subtype, or at any later time to change the subtype of an object.
This still doesn't do anything particularly useful or interesting.
Test Plan:
- Created a non-subtyped object (a Paste).
- Created "task" and "plant" tasks via different forms.
- Created "default" and "plant" tasks via Conduit.
- Changed the subtype of a task via Conduit.
- Tried to set a bad subtype.
{F3492061}
{F3492066}
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T12314
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D17443
Summary:
Ref T12314. This adds a "Change Form Subtype" workflow to the EditEngine form configuration screen, for forms that edit/create objects which support subtyping (for now, only tasks).
For example, this allows you to switch a form from being a "task" form to a "plant" or "animal" form.
Doing this doesn't yet do anything useful or interesting. I'm also not showing it in the UI yet since I'm not sure what we should make that look like (presumably, we should just echo whatever UI we end up with on tasks).
Test Plan:
- Changed the subtype of a task form.
- Verified that the "Change Subtype" action doesn't appear on other forms (for example, those for Pastes).
{F3491374}
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T12314
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D17442
Summary: Ref T12314. Provides a field on tasks for storing subtypes. Does nothing interesting yet.
Test Plan:
- Ran storage upgrade.
- Created some tasks.
- Looked in the database.
- Used Conduit to query some tasks.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T12314
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D17441
Summary:
Ref T12074. This allows callers to identify which columns an object appears in (currently, always tasks).
There are a few major cases:
- Object is in a normal column: we return column information.
- Object is in a proxy column (subproject or milestone). For example, when you look at the board for "Some Parent Project", the task might show up in a milestone column. I've chosen to not return anything in this case: you can figure out that the task is there by looking at the project structure, and this is kind of an internal artifact of the implementation and probably not useful to callers.
- Project does not have a workboard: we return nothing.
These seem fairly reasonable, I think?
Test Plan:
- Queried for tasks, using the "columns" attachment.
- Dragged a task across a board, querying it repeatedly. Got expected results for normal column (the column), subprojects with no board (nothing), milestones with no board (nothing) and mielstones/subprojects with a board (the column on //that// board, only, not the proxy column on the parent).
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T12074
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D17156
Summary: Ref T4788. This seems reasonable locally, but not sure how it will feel on real data. Might need some tweaks, or might just be a terrible idea.
Test Plan: {F1708059}
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T4788
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D16214
Summary:
Ref T11179. This splits "Edit Blocking Tasks" into two options now that we have more room ("Edit Parent Tasks", "Edit Subtasks").
This also renames "Blocking" tasks to "Subtasks", and "Blocked" tasks to "Parent" tasks. My goals here are:
- Make the relationship direction more clear: it's more clear which way is up with "parent" and "subtask" at a glance than with "blocking" and "blocked" or "dependent" and "dependency".
- Align language with "Create Subtask".
- To some small degree, use more flexible/general-purpose language, although I haven't seen any real confusion here.
Fixes T6815. I think I narrowed this down to two issues:
- Just throwing a bare exeception (we now return a dialog explicitly).
- Not killing open transactions when the cyclec check fails (we now kill them).
Test Plan:
- Edited parent tasks.
- Edited subtasks.
- Tried to introduce graph cycles, got a nice error dialog.
{F1697087}
{F1697088}
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T6815, T11179
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D16166
Summary:
Ref T11035. This only fixes half of the issue: comment editing has been fixed, but normal transactions which edit things like descriptions haven't yet.
The normal edits aren't fixed because the "oldValues" are populated too late. The code should start working once they get populated sooner, but I don't want to jump the gun on that since it'll probably have some spooky effects. I have some other transaction changes coming down the pipe which should provide a better context for testing "oldValue" population order.
Test Plan:
- Mentioned `@dog` in a comment.
- Removed `@dog` as a subscriber.
- Edited the comment, adding some unrelated text at the end (e.g., fixing a typo).
- Before change: `@dog` re-added as subscriber.
- After change: no re-add.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T11035
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D16108
Summary:
Ref T6027. We currently have two different transaction types:
- `TYPE_PROJECT_COLUMNS` does most of the work, but has a sort of weird structure and isn't really suitable for API use.
- `TYPE_COLUMN` is this weird, junk transaction which mostly just creates the other transaction.
Merge them into a single higher-level `TYPE_COLUMNS` transaction which works properly and has a sensible structure and comprehensive error checking.
Remaining work here:
- I've removed the old rendering logic, but not yet added new logic. I need to migrate the old transaction types and add new rendering logic.
- Although the internal representation is now //suitable// for use in the API, it isn't properly exposed yet.
Test Plan:
- Created tasks into a column.
- Ran unit tests.
- Moved tasks between columns.
- Will perform additional testing in followups.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T6027
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15634
Summary:
Ref T10537. These are objects which are bound to some external object, like a Maniphest task which is a representation of a GitHub issue.
This doesn't do much yet and may change, but my thinking is:
- I'm putting these on-object instead of on edges because I think we want to actively change the UI for them (e.g., clearly call out that the object is bridged) but don't want every page to need to do extra queries in the common case where zero bridged objects exist anywhere in the system.
- I'm making these one-to-one, more or less: an issue can't be bridged to a bunch of tasks, nor can a bunch of tasks be bridged to a single issue. Pretty sure this makes sense? I can't come up with any reasonable, realistic cases where you want a single GitHub issue to publish to multiple different tasks in Maniphest.
- Technically, one type of each bridgable object could be bridged, but I expect this to never actually occur. Hopefully.
Test Plan: Ran storage upgrade, loaded some pages.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Subscribers: Luke081515.2
Maniphest Tasks: T10537
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15502
Summary:
Ref T10493.
- Call this action "Unassigned" instead of "Up For Grabs", since the latter implies that it's OK for anyone to grab it, which is a social/context thing that we probably shouldn't assume.
- Show who a task was previously assigned to in the transaction.
The text is a little clunky, yell if you've got a better wording? Or maybe I'll come up with something.
Test Plan: {F1166299}
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Subscribers: cburroughs
Maniphest Tasks: T10493
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15454
Summary:
Every caller returns `true`. This was added a long time ago for Projects, but projects are no longer subscribable.
I don't anticipate needing this in the future.
Test Plan: Grepped for this method.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15409
Summary:
Fixes T8197. Currently, if you priority-sort a workboard and drag a card to the top or bottom, we change the priority even if we do not need to.
For example, if the lowest priority in a column is "Low", and you drag a "Wishlist" task underneath it, we incorrectly increase the priority of the task to "Low", when we do not actually need to touch it. This is bad/confusing.
A similar thing happens when dragging a "High" priority task to the top of a column where the highest priority is currently "Normal".
Test Plan:
- Create a column with a "Normal" task.
- Sort workboard by Priority.
- Drag a "High" task above it. After patch: task still "High".
- Drag a "Wishlist" task below it. After patch: task still "Wishlist".
Also dragged a ton of tasks into the middle of other tasks.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T8197
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15240
Summary: Ref T4427.
Test Plan:
- Dragged a 17 XP task from "Hunting" to "Slain".
- Saw 17 XP move.
- Level up!
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T4427
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15237
Summary:
Ref T4900. Briefly:
- Much more layout and rendering is now done in Javascript.
- This should otherwise be identical to the behavior at HEAD, except that:
- editing a task and removing the current board from it no longer removes the task; and
- points still don't work.
However, this can now plausibly support realtime workboard updates and other complex state-based behaviors like points calculations in a future change.
Test Plan:
- Changed card covers.
- Moved cards.
- Sorted board by priority and natural.
- Added new cards.
- Edited cards in place.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T4900
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15234
Summary:
Ref T4427.
- New config option for labels, enabling, etc., but no UI/niceness yet.
- When enabled, add a field.
- Allow nonnegative values, including fractional values.
- EditEngine is nice and Conduit / actions basically just work with a tiny bit of extra support code.
Test Plan:
- Edited points via "Edit".
- Edited points via Conduit.
- Edited points via stacked actions.
- Tried to set "zebra" points.
- Tried to set -1 points.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T4427
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15220
Summary:
Currently never read or written.
Supports fractions.
There's no such thing as an unsigned double so this also supports negative values, technically, although I'll eventually prevent this in the UI.
Test Plan: `bin/storage upgrade`, then created and edited a task. Nothing was different.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15218
Summary:
Before edges, we stored some of this stuff directly on tasks.
- `attached` was migrated to edges in Jan 2013.
- `projectPHIDs` was never used, as far as I can tell?
- `ccPHIDs` was migrated away and dropped more than a year ago.
None of these columns are used in modern code (instead, modern code uses edges).
Test Plan: `grep`, browsed around, `bin/storage upgrade`, unit tests.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15216
Summary: This was slightly more complex than I believed, but not too terrible.
Test Plan:
{F1096126}
- Also used some normal file uploaders to make sure I didn't break that.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15202
Summary:
No way to set photos yet, but if you magic them in they work.
Primarily, this consolidates rendering logic so the move + edit + view controllers all run the same code to do tags / cover photos.
Test Plan: {F1095870}
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15201
Summary:
Ref T6183. Ref T10054. Historically, only members could watch projects because there were some weird special cases with policies. These policy issues have been resolved and Herald is generally powerful enough to do equivalent watches on most objects anyway.
Also puts a "Watch Project" button on the feed panel to make the behavior and meaning more obvious.
Test Plan:
- Watched a project I was not a member of.
- Clicked the feed watch/unwatch button.
{F1064909}
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T6183, T10054
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15063
Summary:
Ref T6884. Ref T10004. For various reasons we previously didn't publish these transactions, but now do. This is probably a better behavior overall, but we didn't have reasonable strings for them.
Parent tasks now show "alice created blocking task Txxx.".
Feed now shows nothing, since "alice created task Txxx." is right next to any story we would show and showing them both seems silly.
Test Plan:
- Created subtasks.
- Viewed parent tasks.
- Viewed feed.
- Saw pretty reasonable strings/stories.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T6884, T10004
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D14849
Summary: Ref T9979. This simplifies/standardizes the code a bit, but mostly gives us more consistent class names and structure.
Test Plan:
- Used `bin/search index --type ...` to index documents of every indexable type.
- Searched for documents by unique text, found them.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T9979
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D14842
Summary:
Ref T10004. This restores "alice created this task." transactions, but in a generic way so we don't have to special case one of the other edits with an old `null` value.
In most cases, creating an object now shows only an "alice created this thing." transaction, unless nonempty defaults (usually, policy or spaces) were adjusted.
Test Plan: Created pastes, tasks, blogs, packages, and forms. Saw a single "alice created this thing." transaction.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T10004
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D14820
Summary: Ref T9964. Priorities and statuses have metadata (colors, names, etc) which we can reasonably just return from API callers. This is so ligthweight that I think it doesn't really make sense to put in an attachment. We also use this information in `arc tasks`.
Test Plan: Called API, got sensible looking status and priority data back.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T9964
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D14777
Summary: Ref T9964. This just adds more structure to application fields, to make it harder to make typos and easier to validate them later.
Test Plan: Viewed APIs, called some APIs, saw good documentation and correct results.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T9964
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D14776
Summary: Ref T9964. Builds on D14772. Allows callers to get the raw content of pastes as an attachment.
Test Plan:
- Read docs.
- Executed attachment query.
- Saw raw paste content.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T9964
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D14774
Summary: Ref T9964. This is a basic implementation of the new "maniphest.search" endpoint.
Test Plan: Clicked the button in the web UI, got meaningful results back.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T9964
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D14760
Summary: Ref T9908. This is the last of the things that need to swap over.
Test Plan:
- Created tasks from a workboard.
- Created tasks in different columns.
- Edited tasks.
- Used `?parent=..`.
- Verified that default edit form config now affects comment actions.
- No more weird comment thing on forms, at least for now.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T9908
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D14715
Summary: Ref T9908. This fixes "Create Subtask" so it works with the new stuff. Mostly straightforward.
Test Plan: Created some subtasks.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T9908
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D14706
Summary:
Ref T9908. This removes the "Create Another Empty Task", "Create A Similar Task" and "Create Another Subtask of Same Parent Task" workflow callouts on the task detail page, which are actions that show up after creating a task or creating a subtask.
- I think "Create Empty" isn't relevant now that we have "Create Task" nearby and the quick create menu?
- I'm not sure if "Create Similar" is worth keeping. If we do want to retain it, I'd maybe like to find a way to do it generically.
- I'm likewise not sure if "Create another subtask" is worth keeping.
Overall, these actions are weird/unusual and I'm not sure how valuable they are. I'm open to keeping "Similar" and/or "Subtask" but I'd like to verify that they're still valuable and make sure we have a reasonable design for them if we retain them.
For example, if we want to retain "Similar", maybe a better approach is just to add "Create Similar Object" to every action menu (which is now possible for EditEngine applications)? There's at least some interest in "Create Similar Repository" in Diffusion.
Also removes a very very old piece of "attached files" code.
Test Plan: Created and viewed some tasks.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T9908
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D14705
