Summary: Consistent look for panels, test for mobile, forms consistency
Test Plan: test Macro on web and iOS sim
Reviewers: epriestley, btrahan
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: aran, Korvin
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D5959
Summary: Ref T2784.
Test Plan: loaded up a git commit with refs and they showed up! loaded up a git commit without revs and nothing showed up.
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: aran, Korvin
Maniphest Tasks: T2784
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D5957
Summary: Ref T2784. This is a lower-level one from drequest so it gets the conditional initialization treatment. Consolidated SVN as well even though SVN is issuing database queries; I felt better about the code de-duplication despite the small performance hit when we could just query the DB directly in the SVN case.
Test Plan: browsed around my Phabricator repositories in Mercurial, Git, and SVN flavors. Looked good.
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: aran, Korvin
Maniphest Tasks: T2784
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D5956
Summary: Ref T2784.
Test Plan: loaded up my git and mercurial copies of Phabricator. Searched for "diff". Observed many results and pagination working correctly.
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: aran, Korvin
Maniphest Tasks: T2784
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D5955
Summary:
Moves all remaining mail handling into ReplyHandlers.
Farewell, `getPhabricatorToInformation()`! You were a bad method and no one liked you.
Ref T1205.
Test Plan:
- Used test console to send mail to Revisions, Tasks, Conpherences and Commits (these all actually work).
- Used test console to send mail to Requests, Macros, Questions and Mocks (these accept the mail but don't do anything with it, but didn't do anything before either).
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T1205
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D5953
Summary:
See <https://github.com/facebook/phabricator/issues/320>. We have a soft dependency on 'fileinfo', which we try to recover from (with `file`) but won't be able to on Windows and apparently FreeBSD systems. Since users can ignore setup checks anyway now, just raise a warning during install.
I believe almost all installs should have this extension, it has been part of the core for a long time.
Test Plan: Faked setup failure, looked at warning. "Solved" setup failure, saw it go away.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D5952
Summary:
See <https://github.com/facebook/phabricator/issues/320>. Files can end up with a bad MIME type, and we don't update it when uploading another copy of the file since obviously the new copy has the same data and thus the same MIME type.
- Rename `bin/files metadata` to `bin/files rebuild` to make it a more consistent verb.
- Let it rebuild MIME types so users who hit issues like this can run `bin/files rebuild --all --rebuild-mime` to straighten things out.
Test Plan: Ran `bin/files` in various modes, examined output.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D5951
Summary: Fixes T3210
Test Plan: Run the conduit call via the UI and ensure it no longer breaks. Check I get an error returned if no params are set
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: aran, Korvin
Maniphest Tasks: T3210
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D5950
Summary: This does the wrong thing (fatals) if there are no passed PHIDs.
Test Plan: No more fatal.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D5940
Summary: Ref T1205. Moves the handling logic for these email types to reply handlers.
Test Plan: Used test form to send conpherence and maniphest mail.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T1205
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D5945
Summary: Currently this is fairly hard-coded. Instead, make it use available receivers. Ref T1205.
Test Plan: Used mail form to send mail to various objects (Dnn, Tnn, Cnn, etc.). Only some of these work right now because the receiver thing still hard-codes a bunch of junk.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T1205
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D5944
Summary:
Ref T1205. Finally able to delete a big chunk of this nastiness.
Make MailReceivers responsible for validating senders. For object creation receivers (bugs, conpherences) this just means that users must not be disabled. For other receivers the senders must be able to see the objects, have the right hashes, etc., according to policy.
Test Plan: Added a bunch of test cases (everything except policy). Verified behavior via the Receive test console.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T1205
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D5943
Summary: This doesn't do anything, but touches a bunch of files so I split it out to reduce the size of the next diff. Basically, make `MailReceiver` classes responsible for loading their application objects. Ref T1205.
Test Plan: Inspection / next diff / code is not reached.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T1205
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D5941
Summary:
Normalize the unit test environment by installing all applications.
The immediate issue this fixes is that `testDropUnknownSenderMail` depends on Maniphest being installed. Some possible fixes are:
# Don't rely on the Maniphest mail receiver for the test (e.g., write a stub/dummy/mock receiver).
# Explicitly make sure Maniphest is installed before running the test.
# Normalize the test environment to install all applications.
I don't like (1) much because it turns a pretty good 10 line test into a bunch of stub classes or mock junk. I'll do it if we have more uses after a few more diffs, but so far running these tests against real code hasn't created a dependency mess and we get more coverage.
I don't like (2) much because I think requiring tests to do this will do more harm than good. The number of issues we'll hypothetically uncover by exposing unrealized application interdependencies is probably very small or maybe zero, and they're probably all trivial. But tests with an undeclared but implicit dependency on an application (e.g., Differential tests depend on Differential) are common.
So here's (3), which I think is reasonable.
I also simplified some of this code a little bit, and moved the Application object cache one level down (this was sort of a bug -- installation status is variant across requests).
Test Plan: Added unit test.
Reviewers: wez, btrahan
Reviewed By: wez
CC: aran
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D5938
Summary: Image URLs were accidentally inaccurate due to the macro ID being overwritten by the file ID when searching for users
Test Plan: Visited the macro page and searched for my own macros. They are now clickable.
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: aran, Korvin
Maniphest Tasks: T3193
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D5936
Summary: Copies sender identification logic into MailReceivers and makes it basically sane. The mess we run into after this try/catch is terrifying so I'm avoiding actually getting rid of any of it quite yet. Ref T1205.
Test Plan: Added a bit of test coverage. Used Receiver test console to verify some additional behaviors.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: Afaque_Hussain, aran
Maniphest Tasks: T1205
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D5931
Summary: forgot to specify the commit! On github as https://github.com/facebook/phabricator/pull/318, though this is a tighter fix.
Test Plan: tried to save an owners package with a folder - FAIL - then with the patch - GREAT SUCCESS
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: aran, Korvin
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D5933
Summary: Adding Email reply support for external users.
Test Plan: Please let me know if I have approached it correctly. Had few doubts. Will proceed after your comments :)
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: aran, Korvin, AnhNhan, jennis.mekwan3
Maniphest Tasks: T1205
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D5912
Summary: Ref T2784. This one was a wee bit complicated. Had to add PhabricatorUser and concept of initFromConduit (or not) to DiffusionRequest.
Test Plan: foreach repo, visited CALLSIGN and clicked a commit and verified they laoded correctly. Hacked code to hit NOT via Conduit and repeated tests to great success.
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: chad, aran, Korvin
Maniphest Tasks: T2784
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D5928
Summary: Ref T3183. We should accept addresses like `"New Bug" <bugs@example.com>` to match `bugs@example.com`.
Test Plan: Ran unit tests.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T3183
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D5923
Summary: title does not say it all; also added conduit wrappers for rawdiffquery and lastmodifiedquery. These get the wrapper treatment since they are used in daemons. Ref T2784.
Test Plan: for each of the 3 VCS, did the following: 1) loaded up CALLSIGN and verified 'Modified' column data showed up correctly in Browse Repository box. 2) loaded up the "change" view for a specific file and verified content showed up correctly. 3) loaded up a specific commit and noted the changes ajax loaded A-OK
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: chad, aran, Korvin
Maniphest Tasks: T2784
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D5896
Summary: This piggybacks onto device-phone's CSS rules to enable a full width form (for smaller spaces).
Test Plan: Convert New Message dialog to fullWidth.
Reviewers: epriestley, btrahan
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: aran, Korvin
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D5924
Summary:
Ref T1205. Continuation of D5915.
Currently, `PhabricatorMetaMTAReceivedMail` has //all// the logic for routing mail. In particular:
- New mail receivers in applications must edit it.
- Mail receivers don't drop out when applications are uninstalled.
Applications have some logic in subclasses of `PhabricatorMailReplyHandler`, but this class is a bit of a mess. It is also heavily based on the assumption that mail receivers are objects (like revisions), but this is not true in at least two cases today (creating new tasks with `bugs@`, creating a new Conpherence thread) and likely other cases in the future (e.g., revision-by-mail).
Move this logic into a new `PhabricatorMailReceiver` classtree. This is similar to `PhabricatorMailReplyHandler` but a bit cleaner and more general. I plan to heavily reduce the responsibilities of `PhabricatorMailReplyHandler` or possibly eliminate it entirely.
For now, the new classtree doesn't do much of interest. The only behavioral change this diff causes is that Phabricator will now reject mail to an application when that application is uninstalled.
I also moved all the `ReplyHandler` classes into `mail/` directories in their respective applications.
Test Plan: Unit tests, used receive test to route mail to various objects.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: Afaque_Hussain, edward, aran
Maniphest Tasks: T1205
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D5922
Summary:
We/I broke a couple of things here recently (see D5911) and are doing some work here in general (see D5912, etc.).
Generally, this code is pretty oldschool and not especially well architected for modern application-oriented Phabricator. It hardcodes a lot of stuff which should be applications' responsibilites.
Take the first steps toward making it more solid to reduce the risk here. In particular:
- Factor out the "self mail" and "duplicate mail" checks and add unit tests.
- Make Message-ID hash handling automatic.
Test Plan: Ran unit tests.
Reviewers: btrahan, chad
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D5915
Summary: Fixes T3188. See that task for details.
Test Plan: Viewed packages with and without project membership; no more exception.
Reviewers: btrahan, chad
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T3188
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D5918
Summary:
Fixes T3181.
- Inbound `bugs@` mail is broken right now if it doesn't use the new external user stuff, because it calls `$user->getPhabricatorUser()` on an object which is already a `PhabricatorUser`. Instead, build the right `$user` object from the external user earlier on.
- Maniphest mail is nuking or otherwise awkwardly altering CCs. Make this work properly.
- Make sure "!unsubscribe" works correctly.
Test Plan: Sent `bugs@` mail. Sent CC mail. Sent "!unsubscribe" mail.
Reviewers: btrahan, chad
Reviewed By: chad
CC: aran, tido
Maniphest Tasks: T3181
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D5911
Summary:
`number_format()` returns a string, so if passed a number greater than 999 by default it will add commas, which parsed by %d will only return the 1000's delimter.
```echo sprintf("%d", number_format(1000)); // Outputs 1
echo sprintf("%s", number_format(1000)); // Outputs 1,000
Test Plan: Looked at repos with over 999 commits.
Reviewers: epriestley, chad
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: aran, Korvin
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D5913
Summary: Maniphest sends email to External users.
Test Plan:
{F42649}
It seems that maniphest tries to send an email, my install is not configured to deliver email.
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: aran, Korvin, AnhNhan
Maniphest Tasks: T1205
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D5856
Summary:
Ref T2784. Begins pulling discovery into Engines and covering it with tests. In particular:
- Discovery is currently a one-shot process where we find all the new commits and write them to the database in one go. Split it apart so we find and return the new commits first, then write them to the database separately. This makes things simpler and more testable.
- This diff only brings SVN into an engine (and only the "find the commits" part), since it's simpler than Git or Mercurial.
- Creates a base Engine class and moves common functionality there.
- Restores the `--verbose` flag to `repository pull`.
Test Plan: Added unit tests. Ran `bin/repository discover`. Ran `bin/phd debug pulllocal`.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T2784
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D5906
Summary:
Ref T2784. This moves us toward being able to test the background and Conduit pipelines for repositories. In particular:
- Separate the logic for pulling repositories (`git pull`, `hg pull`) out of `PhabricatorRepositoryPullLocalDaemon` and put it in `PhabricatorRepositoryPullEngine`. This allows repositories to be pulled directly without invoking the daemons.
- Add tests for the engine, including a future-looking base test case.
- Add basic `PhutilDirectoryFixture`-based repositories.
Next steps:
# Do the same for repo discovery.
# Then we can start writing tests against specific Conduit methods.
Test Plan: Ran unit tests. Ran `bin/repository pull` on SVN, Hg and Git repositories. Ran `bin/phd debug pulllocal`.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran, nh
Maniphest Tasks: T2784
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D5904
Summary: Added a space in between "document" and "DocumentName"
Test Plan: Edit a document
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: aran
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D5909
Summary: Converts to ObjectList for display, pht's most everything, some responsive design when possible. Tables still are tables, but scroll on touch.
Test Plan: Use iOS simulator on Diffusion, Chrome
Reviewers: epriestley, btrahan
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: aran, Korvin
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D5847
Summary: This is just a bit of gardening in order to make the responsive-UI diff easier; I'll be putting `getColorFor($status)` type things in this class, following the pattern in `ManiphestTaskStatus`.
Test Plan: Poke around Releeph.
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: aran, Korvin
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D5893
Summary:
Migrate to `PhabricatorApplicationTransactions` (`ReleephRequestTransactions` applied by `ReleephRequestTransactionalEditor`, instead of `ReleephRequestEvents` created by `ReleephRequestEditor`) and migrate all the old events into transactions. Email is supported in the standard way (no more `ReleephRequestMail`) as well.
This also collapses the Releeph request create and edit controllers into one class, as well as breaking everyone's subject-based mail rules by standardising them (but which should be more easily filtered by looking at headers.)
Test Plan:
* Make requests, then pick them.
* Pick and revert the same request so that discovery happens way after `arc` has told Releeph about what's been happening.
* Try to pick something that fails to pick in a project with pick instructions (and see the instructions are in the email.)
* Load all of FB's Releeph data into my DB and run the `storage upgrade` script.
* Request a commit via the "action" in a Differential revision.
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: epriestley, aran, Korvin, wez
Maniphest Tasks: T3092, T2720
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D5868
Summary: Oops, `pht()` interpolates percent escape sequences, but this is a literal "%N".
Test Plan: Edit a Releeph project; notice no errors.
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: aran, Korvin
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D5897
Summary: forgot to declare this method as static. PHP manages to make it work functionally anyway. Ref T2784. Fixes T3175.
Test Plan: loaded diffusion, observed no errors
Reviewers: chad, epriestley
CC: aran, Korvin
Maniphest Tasks: T3175, T2784
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D5899
Summary: Can name saved queries.
Test Plan: Try naming some saved queries using the form.
Reviewers: epriestley
CC: aran, Korvin, AnhNhan
Maniphest Tasks: T2625
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D5878
Conflicts:
src/infrastructure/storage/patch/PhabricatorBuiltinPatchList.php
Summary: title. Ref T2784.
Test Plan: foreach of SVN, Mercurial, and Git, loaded up a repository. Verified that only git had a tags box and it showed up correctly. Went to CALLSIGN/tags and verified that only git had a tags box and it showed up correctly. Went to various commits across vcs and verified it said "none" unless it was a git commit that also was tagged.
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: chad, aran, Korvin
Maniphest Tasks: T2784
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D5894
Summary: I wrote some of the Releeph-project edit-page's help in remarkup. This renders the remarkup using the `PhabricatorMarkupEngine` pipeline.
Test Plan:
* Edit a Releeph project.
* Feel the cool base of a laptop whose CPU is no longer being thrashed by onerous remarkup rendering duties.
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: aran, Korvin
Maniphest Tasks: T3098
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D5898
Summary:
We have a few interfaces where add "Edit", "Delete" or some other action to a list. Currently, this happens via icons, but these are cumbersome and weird, are inconsistent, can't be workflow'd, are hard to hit on desktops and virtually impossible to hit on mobile, and generally just feel iffy to me. Prominent examples are Projects and Flags. I'd like to try adding an "edit" action to Maniphest (to provide quick edit from list views, basically). It looks like some of Releeph would benefit here, as well.
Instead, provide first-class actions:
{F42978}
They produce targets which my meaty ham-fists can plausibly hit on mobile, too:
{F42979}
(We could do some kind of swipe-to-expose thing eventually, but I think putting them by default is OK?)
Test Plan: Added UIExamples. Checked desktop/mobile.
Reviewers: chad, btrahan, edward
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D5890
Summary: see title. Ref T2784.
Test Plan:
In diffusion, for each of SVN, Mercurial, and Git, I loaded up /diffusion/CALLSIGN/. I verified the README was displayed and things looked good. Next I clicked on "browse" on the top-most commit and verified things looked correct. Also clicked through to a file for a good measure and things looked good.
In owners, for each of SVN, Mercurial, and Git, I played around with the path typeahead / validator. It worked correctly!
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: chad, aran, Korvin
Maniphest Tasks: T2784
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D5883
Summary: Adds the PHIDs of the tasks that the current task depends on.
Test Plan: Use conduit to query a task with and without tasks it depends on.
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: aran, Korvin
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D5892
Summary:
Fixes T3151. Javelin treats a behavior without parameters as a global behavior and invokes it only once no matter how many times it is initialized (this is necessarily correct for any reasonable behavior, as the inputs do not vary). A recent patch changed `differential-dropdown-menus` from a zero-argument global behavior to an implicitly nonzero-argument behavior by adding `pht`.
Currently, we initialize the behavior next to dropdown menu creation, so this resulted in `O(N^2)` initializations of the menus. For large diffs, this locks browsers. Instead, initialize outside of the dropdown loop so we ginitialize each menu just once.
Test Plan: Viewed a 2,000 file diff without browser lock.
Reviewers: wez, vrana, btrahan
Reviewed By: wez
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T3151
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D5885
Summary: Fixes the button spacing issue (doesn't seem related to forms?) and moves fonts and sizes over to Helvetica.
Test Plan: Submit many inline comments.
Reviewers: epriestley, btrahan
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: aran, Korvin
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D5882
