1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://we.phorge.it/source/phorge.git synced 2024-11-25 16:22:43 +01:00
Commit graph

10 commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
epriestley
55e49d7e31 Provide more buildXClause() and buildXClauseParts() on PolicyAwareQuery
Summary:
Ref T4100. Ref T5595. These functions are trivial for now, but move us toward being able to define more default query behavior by default.

Future changes will give these methods meaningful, nontrivial behaviors.

Test Plan: `arc unit --everything`

Reviewers: btrahan

Reviewed By: btrahan

Subscribers: epriestley

Maniphest Tasks: T5595, T4100

Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D12454
2015-04-20 10:06:10 -07:00
epriestley
f5580c7a08 Make buildWhereClause() a method of AphrontCursorPagedPolicyAwareQuery
Summary:
Ref T4100. Ref T5595.

To support a unified "Projects:" query across all applications, a future diff is going to add a set of "Edge Logic" capabilities to `PolicyAwareQuery` which write the required SELECT, JOIN, WHERE, HAVING and GROUP clauses for you.

With the addition of "Edge Logic", we'll have three systems which may need to build components of query claues: ordering/paging, customfields/applicationsearch, and edge logic.

For most clauses, queries don't currently call into the parent explicitly to get default components. I want to move more query construction logic up the class tree so it can be shared.

For most methods, this isn't a problem, but many subclasses define a `buildWhereClause()`. Make all such definitions protected and consistent.

This causes no behavioral changes.

Test Plan: Ran `arc unit --everything`, which does a pretty through job of verifying this statically.

Reviewers: btrahan

Reviewed By: btrahan

Subscribers: yelirekim, hach-que, epriestley

Maniphest Tasks: T4100, T5595

Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D12453
2015-04-20 10:06:09 -07:00
epriestley
7fc7b89bb4 Remove some dead Phortune code
Summary: Ref T2787. This stuff is now irrelevant and/or has no callsites.

Test Plan: `grep`, poked around

Reviewers: chad, btrahan

Reviewed By: chad, btrahan

Subscribers: epriestley

Maniphest Tasks: T2787

Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10684
2014-10-13 11:14:33 -07:00
epriestley
159e56d58a Make Phortune account members editable and modernize the edge constant
Summary:
Ref T2787.

  - Account members can add and remove other members (major use case is corporate accounts).
  - Use a modern edge constant setup.

Test Plan: See screenshots.

Reviewers: btrahan

Reviewed By: btrahan

Subscribers: epriestley

Maniphest Tasks: T2787

Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10678
2014-10-10 15:00:06 -07:00
epriestley
fe5bc764b3 Support multiple payment accounts and account switching in Phortune
Summary: Ref T2787. Support multiple payment accounts so you can have personal vs company payment accounts.

Test Plan: See screenshots.

Reviewers: btrahan

Reviewed By: btrahan

Subscribers: epriestley

Maniphest Tasks: T2787

Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10673
2014-10-09 16:59:03 -07:00
epriestley
e9615b74a5 Move Phortune product logic into applications
Summary: Ref T2787. `Product` is currently a fairly heavy object, but as Phortune develops it makes a lot of sense to make it a lighter object and put more product logic in applications. Convert it into a fairly lightweight reference to applications. The idea is that Phortune is mostly providing a cart flow, and applications manage the details of products.

Test Plan: Funded an initiative for $1.

Reviewers: btrahan

Reviewed By: btrahan

Subscribers: epriestley

Maniphest Tasks: T2787

Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10634
2014-10-06 10:30:06 -07:00
Joshua Spence
86c399b657 Rename PhabricatorApplication subclasses
Summary: Ref T5655. Some discussion in D9839. Generally speaking, `Phabricator{$name}Application` is clearer than `PhabricatorApplication{$name}`.

Test Plan:
# Pinned and uninstalled some applications.
# Applied patch and performed migrations.
# Verified that the pinned applications were still pinned and that the uninstalled applications were still uninstalled.
# Performed a sanity check on the database contents.

Reviewers: btrahan, epriestley, #blessed_reviewers

Reviewed By: epriestley, #blessed_reviewers

Subscribers: hach-que, epriestley, Korvin

Maniphest Tasks: T5655

Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D9982
2014-07-23 10:03:09 +10:00
epriestley
2a5c987c71 Lock policy queries to their applications
Summary:
While we mostly have reasonable effective object accessibility when you lock a user out of an application, it's primarily enforced at the controller level. Users can still, e.g., load the handles of objects they can't actually see. Instead, lock the queries to the applications so that you can, e.g., never load a revision if you don't have access to Differential.

This has several parts:

  - For PolicyAware queries, provide an application class name method.
  - If the query specifies a class name and the user doesn't have permission to use it, fail the entire query unconditionally.
  - For handles, simplify query construction and count all the PHIDs as "restricted" so we get a UI full of "restricted" instead of "unknown" handles.

Test Plan:
  - Added a unit test to verify I got all the class names right.
  - Browsed around, logged in/out as a normal user with public policies on and off.
  - Browsed around, logged in/out as a restricted user with public policies on and off. With restrictions, saw all traces of restricted apps removed or restricted.

Reviewers: btrahan

Reviewed By: btrahan

CC: aran

Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D7367
2013-10-21 17:20:27 -07:00
epriestley
9383abc6b0 Remove unnecessary empty checks from willFilterPage()
Summary: Fixes T3600. These checks are obsolete after D6512.

Test Plan: Syntax / static / inspection.

Reviewers: btrahan

Reviewed By: btrahan

CC: aran

Maniphest Tasks: T3600

Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6563
2013-07-24 15:30:26 -07:00
epriestley
960ac3b2a6 Phortune v0
Summary:
Ref T2787. This does very little so far, but makes inroads on accounts and billing. This is mostly just modeled on what Stripe looks like. The objects are:

  - **Account**: Has one or more authorized users, who can make manage the account. An example might be "Phacility", and the three of us would be able to manage it. A user may be associated with more than one account (e.g., a corporate account and a personal account) but the UI tries to simplify the common case of a single account.
  - **Payment Method**: Something we can get sweet sweet money from; for now, a credit card registered with Stripe. Payment methods are associated with an account.
  - **Product**: A good (one time charge) or service (recurring charge). This might be "t-shirt" or "enterprise plan" or "hourly support" or whatever else.
  - **Purchase**: Represents a user purchasing a Product for an Account, using a Payment Method. e.g., you bought a shirt, or started a plan, or purchased support.
  - **Charge**: Actual charges against payment methods. A Purchase can create more than one charge if it's a plan, or if the first charge fails and we re-bill.

This doesn't fully account for stuff like coupons/discounts yet but they should fit into the model without any issues.

This only implements `Account`, and that only partially.

Test Plan: {F37531}

Reviewers: chad, btrahan

Reviewed By: btrahan

CC: aran

Maniphest Tasks: T2787

Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D5435
2013-03-28 09:10:34 -07:00