Summary: Ref T4100. Update these controls to allow functions like `viewer()`.
Test Plan: Used the new controls.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T4100
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D12527
Summary:
Ref T4100. Share all edge logic code across applications.
- Internalizes the "check that the viewer can see projects" check into edge logic.
- Adds some convenience functions. Some of these aren't really all that convenient, but it's rare that we actually apply project constraints to queries in the applications -- and most of these callsites will go away in the long term -- so I didn't go too crazy with providing a simpler `withProjectPHIDs()` universal API or anything.
Test Plan:
- Grepped for all affected symbols.
- Tried to violate policies.
- Used workboards.
- Used normal Maniphest queries.
- Used `maniphest.query`.
- Verified the special grouping behavior works as expected.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T4100
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D12526
Summary: Ref T4100. Collapse the five inputs into one.
Test Plan:
- Searched for a bunch of stuff.
- Used "Group By: Project", which is a bit of a special case and possibly tricky.
- Created an old query with all the fields, then updated; verified it was preserved/transformed correctly.
{F379971}
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T4100
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D12525
Summary:
Ref T4100.
- Removes the "with unowned" checkbox in favor of the "no owners" function.
- Support functions in "Authors" and "Owners".
Test Plan:
- Ran various global search and Maniphest queries.
{F379931}
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T4100
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D12523
Summary:
Ref T7664. Currently, when spreading subpriorities we may recurse deeply in certain conditions. Make sure we never recurse more than one level.
To try to mitigate issues with floating point precision, be more aggressive about selecting tasks to reorder.
I wasn't really able to come up with a realistic test case here, and the test cases I found which sort of approximated the behavior took way too long to generate data to actually commit.
This approach is inherently somewhat fragile but hopefully this is approximately good enough. We don't have a durable storage engine which can meaningfully represent double-linked lists right now.
Test Plan:
- Wrote some (slow) tests which kind of approximately hit the issue.
- Verified they maxed out at stack depth 2 after the change.
- Unit tests still pass.
- Dragged some tasks around.
- Couldn't come up with any pathological issues here by thinking about it?
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T7664
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D12511
Summary:
See M1433. Fixes T7266. Fixes T4475. Ref T7314.
Future work/notes/etc:
- Write the User Guide (see TODO).
- This might needs some design tweaks -- I think it's functionally almost-equivalent to the mock, but the UI isn't quite the same.
- (Mobile design is a touch off-looking I think?)
- When you use a custom query, the duplicate "magnifying glass" icons are a little weird. Maybe change one or the other.
- Maybe worth adding an "Open Documents in Current Application" option? Planning to wait for feedback on that.
- Need a Quicksand integration to change the current application at some point.
- Searching in "Current Application" from, e.g., the 404 page just searches all documents. Current plan is to just document this behavior, since the icon is a pretty good callout and it seems plausible that this is intuitive enough that users won't have a hard time with it.
Test Plan:
New dropdown:
{F379150}
Device-ish:
{F379151}
Normal search (current application, from maniphest, selects tasks):
{F379153}
Application search from non-application:
{F379154}
Reviewers: btrahan, chad
Reviewed By: chad
Subscribers: johnny-bit, epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T7266, T7314, T4475
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D12509
Summary: Ref T4100. This integration into the "Browse" dialog is probably a little more heavy-handed than we should shoot for.
Test Plan:
{F377131}
{F377132}
Reviewers: btrahan, chad
Reviewed By: chad
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T4100
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D12482
Summary: Ref T4100. Support viewer(), members(), and add a new none().
Test Plan:
- Used all new functions.
- Batch edited tasks with unassign action.
- Saved a query from master, upgrade it to this patch, checkbox migrated cleanly into a "no one" token.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T4100
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D12470
Summary: Ref T4100. Let datasources specify a more meaningful title than the class name.
Test Plan: Browsed some sources.
Reviewers: btrahan, chad
Reviewed By: chad
Subscribers: chad, epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T4100
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D12469
Summary:
Ref T4100. I can simplify the logic a bit here by moving some rendering into the datasources, but a few TokenizerControls currently don't have datasources.
Require datasources and always provide datasources.
Test Plan:
- Used previously-datasourceless controls (e.g., "Add Reviewers").
- Used normal controls.
- Manually verified that no other controls are missing datasources.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T4100
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D12456
Summary:
Ref T4100. Ref T5595. This allows PolicyAwareQuery to write all the logic for AND, OR, NOT, and NULL (i.e., "not in any projects") queries against any edge type.
It accepts an edge type and a list of constraints (which are basically just operator-value pairs, like `<NOT, PHID-X-Y>`, meaning the results must not have an edge connecting them to `PHID-X-Y`).
This doesn't actually do anything yet; see future diffs.
Test Plan: `arc unit --everything`
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T4100, T5595
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D12455
Summary:
Ref T5523. Adds a new workflow to make some kinds of bulk workboard operations easier.
New dropdown action:
{F376848}
This brings you into the existing bulk edit flow:
{F376849}
When you save an edit, you're taken back to the board:
{F376850}
If you try to edit a column with nothing in it, you get an error:
{F376851}
Note that the selected workboard filter is applied before choosing tasks, so if your filter is set to "open tasks" we only batch edit the open (i.e., currently visible) tasks in the column. I think this is more powerful (it lets you use filtering to select task subsets) but might not be completely obvious in all cases (although I do think it's more obvious than the alternative rule -- just an issue of neither rule being completely obvious).
Test Plan:
- Batch edited tasks in a column.
- Used "Batch Edit Tasks..." to move tasks to a different workboard by removing + adding a project.
- Batch edited a column with filtered-out tasks, verified only visible tasks were edited.
- Batch edited a column with no visible tasks, received error.
- Used the batch editor normally (Maniphest -> Maniphest, no boards).
Reviewers: chad, btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: johnny-bit, cburroughs, epriestley
Projects: #prioritized
Maniphest Tasks: T5523
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D12475
Summary: Ref T5750. This makes browse work for all of the dynamic tokenizers in Herald, Policies, batch editor, etc.
Test Plan: Used tokenizers in Herald, Policies, Batch editor.
Reviewers: chad, btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T5750
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D12442
Summary:
Ref T5750. These are a pain to modernize and most don't matter, so cheat:
- Mark a bunch nonbrowsable, including some that probably should be browsable but which I don't want to deal with for now.
- For static datasources, add an easy server-side filter (this isn't really cheating, and is appropriate for the status/priority/application datasources).
- Make composite sources browsable if their components are browsable.
Test Plan:
- Tried to browse an unbrowsable source, got a 404.
- Browsed a composite source.
- Browsed static sources (priority/status/applications).
- Browsed normal sources (people/projects).
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T5750
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D12438
Summary:
Ref T7803. Prior to this change sequence, Query classes conflated paging values (the actual thing that goes in a "x > 3" clause) with cursor values (arbitrary identifiers which track where the user is in a result list).
Although the two can sometimes be the same, the vast majority of implementations are simpler and better when object IDs are used as cursors and paging values are derived from them.
The new stuff handles this in a consistent way, so we're free to separate getPagingValue() from paging. The new method is essentially getResultCursor().
This also implements getPageCursors(), which allows queries to return directional cursors. The inability to do this was a practical limitation blocking the implementation of T7803.
Test Plan:
- Browsed a bunch of results and paged through queries.
- Grepped for removed methods.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T7803
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D12383
Summary:
Ref T7803. Ref T5873. I want to drive Conduit through more shared infrastructure, but can't currently add parameters automatically.
Put a `getX()` around the `defineX()` methods so the parent can provide default behaviors.
Also like 60% of methods don't define any special error types; don't require them to implement this method. I want to move away from this in general.
Test Plan:
- Ran `arc unit --everything`.
- Called `conduit.query`.
- Browsed Conduit UI.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: hach-que, epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T5873, T7803
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D12380
Summary:
Ref T7803. The ApplicationSearch integration is still a little rough here, but it seems to have the correct behavior.
The rest of this is now at least relatively sane, cohesive, and properly behaved.
Test Plan:
- Used all grouping and ordering queries in Maniphest. Pagingated results.
- Used custom field ordering in Maniphest. Paginated results.
- Paginated through the `null` section of "Assigned" and "Projects" group-by queries. Pagingation now works correctly (it does not work at HEAD).
- Ran unit tests covering priority changes.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T7803
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D12372
Summary:
Ref T7803. Removes some getReversePaging().
This also fixes `null` column handling, by adding an explicit `'null'` key with possible values "head" (put NULL before other values) or "tail" (put NULL after other values).
Maniphest has some glitchiness in paging through NULLs right now, but I believe it's all pre-existing and will be resolved when it fully converts. Diffusion is fully converted and pages through NULL correctly.
Test Plan:
- Failed to identify any reason for ChangesetQuery to reverse paging.
- Paged thorugh Diffusion.
- Paged through Maniphest.
- Maniphest has some issues when paging inside a NULL section, but these issues are preexisting and will be resolved later in this change sequence.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T7803
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D12371
Summary:
Ref T7803. Some Query subclasses implement getPagingColumn() in a trivial way, usually to provide a table alias.
Formalize the concept of a primary table alias, and remove obsoleted getPagingColumn() implementations.
Test Plan: Issued affected queries.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T7803
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D12356
Summary: Ref T7803. Reduce the amount of code we're trusting to build SQL queries.
Test Plan:
- Paged through results in Maniphest, Differential and Diffusion.
- Some of the NULLable groups in Maniphest are a bit funky but this was preexisting.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T7803
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D12353
Summary: Fixes T7778. This was likely caused by removing an `array_filter()` somewhere in the course of T7731, but I'd rather have the code be more correct.
Test Plan:
Sent mail on a task with no owner.
- Before patch: unknown recipient.
- After patch: expected recipients.
Reviewers: btrahan, joshuaspence
Reviewed By: joshuaspence
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T7778
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D12320
Summary:
Fixes T7731. When a user writes a "Send me an email" rule, always try send them an email, even if their notification settings would normally downgrade it to a notification.
In particular, this is stronger than these downgrades:
- Downgrades due to "self actions";
- downgrades due to "mail tags".
Test Plan:
- Wrote various Herald rules with "Send me an email" rules.
- Used `bin/mail list-outbound` / `show-outbound` to vet generated mail.
- Mail reacted properly to a variety of conditions (disabled accounts, settings, "send me an email" rule, forced delivery).
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T7731
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D12300
Summary: These arrays looks a little odd, most likely due to the autofix applied by `ArcanistXHPASTLinter::LINT_ARRAY_SEPARATOR`. See D12296 in which I attempt to improve the autocorrection from this linter rule.
Test Plan: N/A
Reviewers: epriestley, #blessed_reviewers
Reviewed By: epriestley, #blessed_reviewers
Subscribers: epriestley
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D12281
Summary:
Fixes T7199. This still isn't a shining example of perfect code, but the raw amount of copy/paste is much lower than it used to be.
- Reduce code duplication between existing receivers.
- Expose receiving objects in help menus where appropriate.
- Connect some "TODO" receivers.
Test Plan:
- Sent mail to every supported object type.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T7199
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D12249
Summary: Ref T7199. This makes the page look less janky and provides more context about how mail commands work and how to use them.
Test Plan: {F355959}
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T7199
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D12245
Summary:
Ref T7199. Convert the single help menu item into a dropdown and allow applications to list multiple items there.
When an application has mail command objects, link them in the menu.
Test Plan:
{F355925}
{F355926}
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T7199
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D12244
Summary: Ref T7199. This needs some polish and isn't reachable from the UI, but technically has all of the information.
Test Plan:
{F355899}
{F355900}
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T7199
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D12241
Summary:
Ref T7199. This fully modularizes mail command handling in Maniphest.
I had to add a couple of minor not-totally-solid-feeling tricks to deal with the "create" case, but they feel not-too-bad, and a million times better than what came before.
Test Plan: Used all commands with `receive-test`.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T7199
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D12240
Summary:
Ref T7199. Two notable changes:
- Process multiple commands.
- Process commands when creating //or// updating a task.
And generally clean things up a bit.
Test Plan:
- Used `receive-test` to execute all commands for new tasks.
- Used `receive-test` to execute all commands for existing tasks.
- Used a combination of commands to produce varied effects.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T7199
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D12234
Summary:
Ref T7199. In the vein of D12231, these options were a bad idea.
- They once served a very narrow, Facebook-specific need (see T1992), except even Facebook only used the Differential setting AFAIK.
- Outside of that special case, they are unused and essentially unusable (generally speaking, they do not meaningfully implement anything modular or replaceable).
- I have no knowledge of any install ever changing these settings, and can imagine no reason why they would.
Moving forward:
- If they really need to, they can fork locally and chagne one line.
- I expect "!actions" to make mail at least somewhat more modular soon, anyway.
- Any derived handlers would break after T7199 and need to be rewritten anyway, so this is just taking advantage of a BC break to do cleanup.
Test Plan:
- Grepped for removed configuration.
- Sent some mail from applications, verified the reply handlers set proper reply addresses.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T7199
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D12233
Summary:
Ref T7199. These were a bad idea which got copy-pasted a bunch.
- There is zero reason to ever set these to different things.
- Unsurprisingly, I don't know of any install which has them set to different things.
Unless I've completely forgotten about it, this option was not motivated by some obscure business need, it was just a bad decision which didn't catch anyone's attention at the time.
We partially remedied the mistake at some point by introducing `metamta.reply-handler-domain`, which works as a default for all applications, but never cleaned this mess up.
Test Plan: Sent some mail from applications, verified it picked up appropraite reply handler domains.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T7199
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D12231
Summary:
Ref T7199. This prepares for an exciting new world of more powerful "!action" commands. In particular:
- We parse multiple commands per mail.
- We parse command arguments (these are currently not used).
- We parse commands at the beginning or end of mail.
Additionally:
- Do a quick modernization pass on all handlers.
- Break legacy compatibility with really hacky Facebook stuff (see T1992). They've theoretically been on notice for a year and a half, and their setup relies on calling very old reply handler APIs directly.
- Some of these handlers had some copy/paste fluff.
- The Releeph handler is unreachable, but fix it //in theory//.
Test Plan:
- Sent mail to a file; used "!unsubscribe".
- Sent mail to a legalpad document; used "!unsubscribe".
- Sent mail to a task; used various "!close", "!claim", "!assign", etc.
- Sent mail to a paste.
- Sent mail to a revision; used various "!reject", "!claim", etc.
- Tried to send mail to a pull request but it's not actually reachable.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T7199
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D12230
Summary:
Ref T7199. Although this is useful for discovery, it's un-useful enough that we already have an option to disable it, and most applications do not provide any meaningful instructions.
Throwing it away makes it easier to move forward and lets us get rid of a config option.
This is becoming a more advanced/power-user feature anyway, and the new syntax will be significantly more complex and hard to explain with a one-liner. I'm currently thinking that I'll maybe make the "help" menu a dropdown and give it some options like:
+---+
| O |
+---+---------------------+
| Maniphest Documentation |
| Maniphest Email Actions |
+-------------------------+
Then you click the "Email Actions" thing and get a runtime-derived list of available options. Not sure if I'll actually build that, but I think we can fairly throw the in-mail instructions away even if we don't go in that specific direction.
Test Plan: Grepped for `replyHandlerInstructions`, got no hits.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T7199
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D12229
Summary: Ref T7689. Ref T4100. This advances the goals of removing `loadViewerHandles()` (only 67 callsites remain!) and letting tokenizers some day take token functions like `viewer()` and `members(differential)`.
Test Plan:
- Sent a new message; used "To".
- I simplified the cancel URI construction slightly because it's moot in all normal cases.
- Edited a thread; used "Add Participants".
- Searched rooms; used "Participants".
- Searched countdowns; used "Authors".
- Created a diff; used "Repository".
- Edited a revision; edited "Projects"; edited "Reveiwers"; edited "Subscribers".
- Searched for revisions; edited "responsible users"; "authors"; "reviwers"; "subscribers"; "repositories".
- Added revision comments; edited "Add Reveiwers"; "Add Subscribers".
- Commented on a commit; edited "Add Auditors"; "Add subscribers".
- Edited a commit; edited "Projects".
- Edited a repository; edited "Projects".
- Searched feed, used "include Users"; "include Proejcts".
- Searched files, used "authors".
- Edited initiative; edited "Projects".
- Searched backers; used "Backers".
- Searched initiatives; used "Owners".
- Edited build plans; edited "Run Command".
- Searched Herald; used "Authors".
- Added signature exemption in Legalpad.
- Searhced legalpad; used "creators"; used "contributors".
- Searched signatures; used "documents"; used "signers".
- Created meme.
- Searched macros; used "Authors".
- Used "Projects" in Maniphest reports.
- Used Maniphest comment actions.
- Edited Maniphest tasks; edited "Assigned To"; edited "CC"; edited "projects".
- Used "parent" in Maniphest task creation workflow.
- Searched for projects; used "assigned to"; "in any projec"; "in all projects"; "not in projects"; "in users' projects"; "authors"; "subscribers".
- Edited Maniphest bug filing domains, used "Default Author".
- Searched for OAuth applications, used "Creators".
- Edited Owners pacakge; edited "Primary Owner"; edited "Owners".
- Searched for Owners packages; used "Owner".
- OMG this UI is OLD
- Edited a paste; edited "Projects".
- Searched for paste; used "Authors".
- Searched user activity log; used "Actors"; used "Users".
- Edited a mock; edited "Projects"; edited "CC".
- Searched for mocks; used "Authors".
- Edited Phortune account; edited "Members".
- Edited Phortune merchant account; edited "Members".
- Searched Phrequent; used "Users".
- Edited Ponder question; sued "projects".
- Searched Ponder; used "Authors"; used "Answered By".
- Added project members.
- Searched for projects; used "Members".
- Edited a Releeph product; edited "Pushers".
- Searched pull requests; searched "Requestors".
- Edited an arcanist project; used "Uses Symbols From".
- Searhced push logs; used "Repositories"; used "Pushers".
- Searched repositories; used "In nay project".
- Used global search; used Authors/owners/Subscribers/In Any Project.
- Edited a slowvote; used "Projects".
- Searched slovotes; used "Authors".
- Created a custom "Users" field; edited and searched for it.
- Made a whole lot of typos in this list. ^^^^^^
Did not test:
- Lint is nontrivial to test locally, I'll test it in production.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T4100, T7689
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D12224
Summary:
Ref T7689. This gives HandleLists `renderList()` and `renderHandle()` methods, which return views that can perform just-in-time data fetching and generally look and feel like other rendering code, instead of being odd pseudo-functional methods on `Controller`.
Also converts callsites on the Maniphest detail page to use these methods.
Next changes will wipe out more of the callsites.
Test Plan:
- Viewed Maniphest detail page with many relevant handles.
- Created a new subtask.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T7689
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D12205
Summary:
Fixes T7664. When there are a large number of tasks (400+) with the same subpriority (which can happen if the subpriority features are rarely used), it may take more than 30 seconds to rebalance them.
Make the algorithm more aggressive about rebalancing homogenous blocks of tasks.
This may need to get even fancier, but I'd guess it can process blocks 1-2 orders of magnitude larger, which should be ~all installs.
(If someone still hits issues with this, I'll make it fancier.)
Once a block is rebalanced, it doesn't need to be rebalanced again (at least, not as a whole block) so we basically just need to get over the initial hurdle here and then we're good.
In the worst case, we can provide `bin/maniphest rebalance` or similar and do the rebalance step offline.
And, in any case, we have more test coverage here now.
Test Plan:
- Existing tests.
- New tests.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T7664
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D12166
Summary:
Fixes T7563. Fixes T5201. Reframe this as two separate operations:
- Move before or after a task.
- Move to the beginning or end of a priority.
Then:
- Make all the order queries unambiguous and properly reversible, with an explicit `id` order.
- Just reuse `ManiphestTask` to get results in the correct order.
- Simplify the actual transaction apply logic.
- Detect and recover from cases where tasks have identical or similar subpriorities.
Test Plan:
- Wrote and executed unit tests.
- Dragged and dropped tasks within priorities and between priorities in the main Maniphest view.
- Dragged and dropped tasks within priorities in the workboard view, when ordered by priority.
- Also poked at the "natural" order, but that shouldn't be affected.
Reviewers: btrahan, chad
Reviewed By: chad
Subscribers: chad, epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T5201, T7563
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D12121
Summary: Renames the method in PHUIObjectBoxView to match the new PHUIInfoView class.
Test Plan: grepped codebase. Went to Calendar and tried a new status.
Reviewers: btrahan, epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: Korvin, epriestley
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D12005
Summary: Fixes T7392. I kind of stink at SQL so my approach here was to "start over" conceptually and this way makes the most sense to me - we basically do one join on the dependency table and then a second join back from the dependency table to the main task table. In the where clause we filter the resulting rows, first checking the data from dependency join for existence as appropros and then checking the second join for main task table for the proper "open" task values.
Test Plan: made a task X be blocked by task Y. closed task y. search for "not blocked" tasks and saw task X.
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: Korvin, epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T7392
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D11962
Summary: Fixes T7434. We need to LEFT JOIN, not JOIN here, because we still want result rows where the value is `null`.
Test Plan: Issued blocked/not-blocked + blocking/not-blocking queries, got results in all cases.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T7434
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D11939
Summary: Adding better CSS and set correct tag and examples.
Test Plan: Test UIExamples, creating and click on similar task, empty task in Maniphest.
Reviewers: btrahan, epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: Korvin, epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T7423
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D11932
Summary: Fixes T7421. Now that we join the task table again to ignore //closed// blockers, all the column names are ambiguous. Make them unambiguous.
Test Plan: Issued some searches with various different parameters.
Reviewers: btrahan, joshuaspence, chad
Reviewed By: chad
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T7421
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D11922
