mirror of
https://we.phorge.it/source/phorge.git
synced 2024-11-23 07:12:41 +01:00
1329b7b51e
Summary: Ref T1536. Ref T1930. Code is not reachable. This provides password authentication and registration on the new provider/adapter framework. I sort of cheated a little bit and don't really route any password logic through the adapter (instead, this provider uses an empty adapter and just sets the type/domain on it). I think the right way to do this //conceptually// is to treat username/passwords as an external black box which the adapter communicates with. However, this creates a lot of practical implementation and UX problems: - There would basically be two steps -- in the first one, you interact with the "password black box", which behaves like an OAuth provider. This produces some ExternalAccount associated with the username/password pair, then we go into normal registration. - In normal registration, we'd proceed normally. This means: - The registration flow would be split into two parts, one where you select a username/password (interacting with the black box) and one where you actually register (interacting with the generic flow). This is unusual and probably confusing for users. - We would need to do a lot of re-hashing of passwords, since passwords currently depend on the username and user PHID, which won't exist yet during registration or the "black box" phase. This is a big mess I don't want to deal with. - We hit a weird condition where two users complete step 1 with the same username but don't complete step 2 yet. The box knows about two different copies of the username, with two different passwords. When we arrive at step 2 the second time we have a lot of bad choices about how to reoslve it, most of which create security problems. The most stragihtforward and "pure" way to resolve the issues is to put password-auth usernames in a separate space, but this would be incredibly confusuing to users (your login name might not be the same as your username, which is bizarre). - If we change this, we need to update all the other password-related code, which I don't want to bother with (at least for now). Instead, let registration know about a "default" registration controller (which is always password, if enabled), and let it require a password. This gives us a much simpler (albeit slightly less pure) implementation: - All the fields are on one form. - Password adapter is just a shell. - Password provider does the heavy lifting. We might make this more pure at some point, but I'm generally pretty satisfied with this. This doesn't implement the brute-force CAPTCHA protection, that will be coming soon. Test Plan: Registered with password only and logged in with a password. Hit various error conditions. Reviewers: btrahan Reviewed By: btrahan CC: aran, chad Maniphest Tasks: T1536, T1930 Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6164 |
||
|---|---|---|
| .. | ||
| aphront-bars.css | ||
| aphront-notes.css | ||
| attached-file-view.css | ||
| calendar-view.css | ||
| context-bar.css | ||
| dark-console.css | ||
| dialog-view.css | ||
| error-view.css | ||
| form-view.css | ||
| lightbox-attachment.css | ||
| list-filter-view.css | ||
| multi-column.css | ||
| notification.css | ||
| pager-view.css | ||
| panel-view.css | ||
| phabricator-nav-view.css | ||
| request-failure-view.css | ||
| table-view.css | ||
| tokenizer.css | ||
| tooltip.css | ||
| transaction.css | ||
| two-column.css | ||
| typeahead.css | ||