epriestley c86dfd84d9 Wrap basic diff/revision association in a transaction ... Summary: This doesn't cover every case exhaustively (see comments) but should cover like 98% of the practical cases. This makes one workflow modification: willWriteRevision() was previously guaranteed to have a revisionID / revisionPHID and no longer is. I verified that no field implementations depend on this behavior. Fields which depend on IDs should be using didWriteRevision() instead. Test Plan: Inserted a "throw" into the middle of the transactions and created revisions; they didn't orphan. Created revisions normally, they worked correctly. Reviewers: btrahan, nh Reviewed By: btrahan CC: aran, epriestley Maniphest Tasks: T605 Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D1541		2012-02-02 16:03:44 -08:00
..
comment	Improve behavior when user submits a no-op action in Differential	2012-01-15 03:44:09 -08:00
revision	Wrap basic diff/revision association in a transaction	2012-02-02 16:03:44 -08:00