1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://we.phorge.it/source/phorge.git synced 2024-11-30 02:32:42 +01:00
phorge-phorge/resources/celerity/map.php

2357 lines
83 KiB
PHP
Raw Normal View History

<?php
/**
* This file is automatically generated. Use 'bin/celerity map' to rebuild it.
*
* @generated
*/
return array(
'names' => array(
'conpherence.pkg.css' => 'e68cf1fa',
'conpherence.pkg.js' => '15191c65',
'core.pkg.css' => '47535fd5',
Remove "willRenderTimeline()" from ApplicationTransactionInterface Summary: Depends on D19914. Ref T11351. Some of the Phoilo rabbit holes go very deep. `PhabricatorApplicationTransactionInterface` currently requires you to implement `willRenderTimeline()`. Almost every object just implements this as `return $timeline`; only Pholio, Diffusion, and Differential specialize it. In all cases, they are specializing it mostly to render inline comments. The actual implementations are a bit of a weird mess and the way the data is threaded through the call stack is weird and not very modern. Try to clean this up: - Stop requiring `willRenderTimeline()` to be implemented. - Stop requiring `getApplicationTransactionViewObject()` to be implemented (only the three above, plus Legalpad, implement this, and Legalpad's implementation is a no-op). These two methods are inherently pretty coupled for almost any reasonable thing you might want to do with the timeline. - Simplify the handling of "renderdata" and call it "View Data". This is additional information about the current view of the transaction timeline that is required to render it correctly. This is only used in Differential, to decide if we can link an inline comment to an anchor on the same page or should link it to another page. We could perhaps do this on the client instead, but having this data doesn't seem inherently bad to me. - If objects want to customize timeline rendering, they now implement `PhabricatorTimelineInterface` and provide a `TimelineEngine` which gets a nice formal stack. This leaves a lot of empty `willRenderTimeline()` implementations hanging around. I'll remove these in the next change, it's just going to be deleting a couple dozen copies of an identical empty method implementation. Test Plan: - Viewed audits, revisions, and mocks with inline comments. - Used "Show Older" to page a revision back in history (this is relevant for "View Data"). - Grepped for symbols: willRenderTimeline, getApplicationTransactionViewObject, Legalpad classes. Reviewers: amckinley Reviewed By: amckinley Maniphest Tasks: T11351 Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D19918
2018-12-19 20:52:53 +01:00
'core.pkg.js' => 'bd89cb1d',
'differential.pkg.css' => '06dc617c',
Pass timeline view data to comment previews, restoring Differential comment previews Summary: Ref T13222. In D19918, I refactored how timelines get "view data". Today, this is always additional data about which images/changesets/diffs are visible on the current revision/commit/mock, so we can tell if inline comments should be linked to a `#anchor` on the same page (if the inline is rendered there somewhere) or to a `/D123?id=1&vs=2` full link on a different page (if it isn't), but in general this could be any sort of state information about the current page that affects how the timeline should render. Previously, comment previews did not use any specialized object code and always rendered a "generic" timeline story. This was actually a bug, but none of the code we have today cares about this (since it's all inline related, and inlines render separately) so it never impacted anything. After the `TimelineEngine` change, the preview renders with Differential-specific code. This is more correct, but we were not passing the preview the "view data" so it broke. This preview doesn't actually need the view data and we could just make it bail out if it isn't present, but pass it through for consistency and so this works like we'd expect if we do something fancier with view data in the future. Test Plan: Viewed comment and inline comment previews in Differential, saw old behavior restored. Reviewers: amckinley Reviewed By: amckinley Maniphest Tasks: T13222 Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D19943
2019-01-03 01:48:53 +01:00
'differential.pkg.js' => '853c3461',
'diffusion.pkg.css' => 'a2d17c7d',
'diffusion.pkg.js' => '6134c5a1',
'maniphest.pkg.css' => '4845691a',
'maniphest.pkg.js' => '4d7e79c8',
'rsrc/audio/basic/alert.mp3' => '98461568',
'rsrc/audio/basic/bing.mp3' => 'ab8603a5',
'rsrc/audio/basic/pock.mp3' => '0cc772f5',
'rsrc/audio/basic/tap.mp3' => 'fc2fd796',
'rsrc/audio/basic/ting.mp3' => '17660001',
'rsrc/css/aphront/aphront-bars.css' => '231ac33c',
'rsrc/css/aphront/dark-console.css' => '0e14e8f6',
'rsrc/css/aphront/dialog-view.css' => '6bfc244b',
'rsrc/css/aphront/list-filter-view.css' => '5d6f0526',
'rsrc/css/aphront/multi-column.css' => '84cc6640',
'rsrc/css/aphront/notification.css' => '457861ec',
'rsrc/css/aphront/panel-view.css' => '8427b78d',
'rsrc/css/aphront/phabricator-nav-view.css' => '694d7723',
'rsrc/css/aphront/table-view.css' => '8c9bbafe',
'rsrc/css/aphront/tokenizer.css' => '15d5ff71',
'rsrc/css/aphront/tooltip.css' => 'cb1397a4',
'rsrc/css/aphront/typeahead-browse.css' => 'f2818435',
'rsrc/css/aphront/typeahead.css' => 'a4a21016',
'rsrc/css/application/almanac/almanac.css' => 'dbb9b3af',
'rsrc/css/application/auth/auth.css' => '0877ed6e',
'rsrc/css/application/base/main-menu-view.css' => '1802a242',
'rsrc/css/application/base/notification-menu.css' => 'ef480927',
'rsrc/css/application/base/phui-theme.css' => '9f261c6b',
'rsrc/css/application/base/standard-page-view.css' => '34ee718b',
'rsrc/css/application/chatlog/chatlog.css' => 'd295b020',
'rsrc/css/application/conduit/conduit-api.css' => '7bc725c4',
'rsrc/css/application/config/config-options.css' => '4615667b',
'rsrc/css/application/config/config-template.css' => '8f18fa41',
'rsrc/css/application/config/setup-issue.css' => '30ee0173',
'rsrc/css/application/config/unhandled-exception.css' => '4c96257a',
'rsrc/css/application/conpherence/color.css' => 'abb4c358',
'rsrc/css/application/conpherence/durable-column.css' => '89ea6bef',
'rsrc/css/application/conpherence/header-pane.css' => 'cb6f4e19',
'rsrc/css/application/conpherence/menu.css' => '69368e97',
'rsrc/css/application/conpherence/message-pane.css' => 'b0f55ecc',
'rsrc/css/application/conpherence/notification.css' => 'cef0a3fc',
'rsrc/css/application/conpherence/participant-pane.css' => '26a3ce56',
'rsrc/css/application/conpherence/transaction.css' => '85129c68',
'rsrc/css/application/contentsource/content-source-view.css' => '4b8b05d4',
'rsrc/css/application/countdown/timer.css' => '16c52f5c',
2015-06-23 22:43:47 +02:00
'rsrc/css/application/daemon/bulk-job.css' => 'df9c1d4a',
'rsrc/css/application/dashboard/dashboard.css' => 'fe5b1869',
'rsrc/css/application/diff/inline-comment-summary.css' => 'f23d4e8f',
'rsrc/css/application/differential/add-comment.css' => 'c47f8c40',
'rsrc/css/application/differential/changeset-view.css' => 'db34a142',
'rsrc/css/application/differential/core.css' => '5b7b8ff4',
'rsrc/css/application/differential/phui-inline-comment.css' => '65ae3bc2',
'rsrc/css/application/differential/revision-comment.css' => '14b8565a',
2014-03-12 21:53:04 +01:00
'rsrc/css/application/differential/revision-history.css' => '0e8eb855',
'rsrc/css/application/differential/revision-list.css' => 'f3c47d33',
2015-06-23 22:43:47 +02:00
'rsrc/css/application/differential/table-of-contents.css' => 'ae4b7a55',
'rsrc/css/application/diffusion/diffusion-icons.css' => '0c15255e',
'rsrc/css/application/diffusion/diffusion-readme.css' => '419dd5b6',
'rsrc/css/application/diffusion/diffusion-repository.css' => 'ee6f20ec',
'rsrc/css/application/diffusion/diffusion.css' => '45727264',
'rsrc/css/application/feed/feed.css' => 'ecd4ec57',
'rsrc/css/application/files/global-drag-and-drop.css' => 'b556a948',
'rsrc/css/application/flag/flag.css' => 'bba8f811',
'rsrc/css/application/harbormaster/harbormaster.css' => '7446ce72',
'rsrc/css/application/herald/herald-test.css' => 'a52e323e',
'rsrc/css/application/herald/herald.css' => 'cd8d0134',
'rsrc/css/application/maniphest/report.css' => '9b9580b7',
'rsrc/css/application/maniphest/task-edit.css' => 'fda62a9b',
'rsrc/css/application/maniphest/task-summary.css' => '11cc5344',
'rsrc/css/application/objectselector/object-selector.css' => '85ee8ce6',
'rsrc/css/application/owners/owners-path-editor.css' => '9c136c29',
'rsrc/css/application/paste/paste.css' => '9fcc9773',
'rsrc/css/application/people/people-picture-menu-item.css' => 'a06f7f34',
'rsrc/css/application/people/people-profile.css' => '4df76faf',
'rsrc/css/application/phame/phame.css' => '8cb3afcd',
'rsrc/css/application/pholio/pholio-edit.css' => '07676f51',
'rsrc/css/application/pholio/pholio-inline-comments.css' => '8e545e49',
'rsrc/css/application/pholio/pholio.css' => 'ca89d380',
'rsrc/css/application/phortune/phortune-credit-card-form.css' => '8391eb02',
'rsrc/css/application/phortune/phortune-invoice.css' => '476055e2',
'rsrc/css/application/phortune/phortune.css' => '5b99dae0',
'rsrc/css/application/phrequent/phrequent.css' => 'ffc185ad',
'rsrc/css/application/phriction/phriction-document-css.css' => '4282e4ad',
'rsrc/css/application/policy/policy-edit.css' => '815c66f7',
'rsrc/css/application/policy/policy-transaction-detail.css' => '82100a43',
'rsrc/css/application/policy/policy.css' => '957ea14c',
'rsrc/css/application/ponder/ponder-view.css' => 'fbd45f96',
'rsrc/css/application/project/project-card-view.css' => '0010bb52',
'rsrc/css/application/project/project-view.css' => '792c9057',
'rsrc/css/application/releeph/releeph-core.css' => '9b3c5733',
'rsrc/css/application/releeph/releeph-preview-branch.css' => 'b7a6f4a5',
'rsrc/css/application/releeph/releeph-request-differential-create-dialog.css' => '8d8b92cd',
'rsrc/css/application/releeph/releeph-request-typeahead.css' => '667a48ae',
'rsrc/css/application/search/application-search-view.css' => '787f5b76',
'rsrc/css/application/search/search-results.css' => '505dd8cf',
'rsrc/css/application/slowvote/slowvote.css' => 'a94b7230',
'rsrc/css/application/tokens/tokens.css' => '3d0f239e',
'rsrc/css/application/uiexample/example.css' => '528b19de',
'rsrc/css/core/core.css' => '62fa3ace',
'rsrc/css/core/remarkup.css' => 'b182076e',
'rsrc/css/core/syntax.css' => 'e9c95dd4',
'rsrc/css/core/z-index.css' => '9d8f7c4b',
'rsrc/css/diviner/diviner-shared.css' => '896f1d43',
'rsrc/css/font/font-awesome.css' => 'e838e088',
'rsrc/css/font/font-lato.css' => 'c7ccd872',
'rsrc/css/font/phui-font-icon-base.css' => '870a7360',
'rsrc/css/layout/phabricator-filetree-view.css' => 'b912ad97',
'rsrc/css/layout/phabricator-source-code-view.css' => '2ab25dfa',
'rsrc/css/phui/button/phui-button-bar.css' => 'f1ff5494',
'rsrc/css/phui/button/phui-button-simple.css' => '8e1baf68',
'rsrc/css/phui/button/phui-button.css' => '6ccb303c',
'rsrc/css/phui/calendar/phui-calendar-day.css' => '572b1893',
'rsrc/css/phui/calendar/phui-calendar-list.css' => '576be600',
'rsrc/css/phui/calendar/phui-calendar-month.css' => '21154caf',
'rsrc/css/phui/calendar/phui-calendar.css' => 'f1ddf11c',
Replace the "Choose Subtype" radio buttons dialog with a simpler "big stuff you click" sort of UI Summary: Ref T13222. Fixes T12588. See PHI683. In several cases, we present the user with a choice between multiple major options: Alamnac service types, Drydock blueprint types, Repository VCS types, Herald rule types, etc. Today, we generally do this with radio buttons and a "Submit" button. This isn't terrible, but often it means users have to click twice (once on the radio; once on submit) when a single click would be sufficient. The radio click target can also be small. In other cases, we have a container with a link and we'd like to link the entire container: notifications, the `/drydock/` console, etc. We'd like to just link the entire container, but this causes some problems: - It's not legal to link block eleements like `<a><div> ... </div></a>` and some browsers actually get upset about it. - We can `<a><span> ... </span></a>` instead, then turn the `<span>` into a block element with CSS -- and this sometimes works, but also has some drawbacks: - It's not great to do that for screenreaders, since the readable text in the link isn't necessarily very meaningful. - We can't have any other links inside the element (e.g., details or documentation). - We can `<form><button> ... </button></form>` instead, but this has its own set of problems: - You can't right-click to interact with a button in the same way you can with a link. - Also not great for screenreaders. Instead, try adding a `linked-container` behavior which just means "when users click this element, pretend they clicked the first link inside it". This gives us natural HTML (real, legal HTML with actual `<a>` tags) and good screenreader behavior, but allows the effective link target to be visually larger than just the link. If no issues crop up with this, I'd plan to eventually use this technique in more places (Repositories, Herald, Almanac, Drydock, Notifications menu, etc). Test Plan: {F6053035} - Left-clicked and command-left-clicked the new JS fanciness, got sensible behaviors. Reviewers: amckinley Reviewed By: amckinley Subscribers: PHID-OPKG-gm6ozazyms6q6i22gyam Maniphest Tasks: T13222, T12588 Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D19855
2018-12-07 15:04:07 +01:00
'rsrc/css/phui/object-item/phui-oi-big-ui.css' => '7a7c22af',
'rsrc/css/phui/object-item/phui-oi-color.css' => 'cd2b9b77',
'rsrc/css/phui/object-item/phui-oi-drag-ui.css' => '08f4ccc3',
'rsrc/css/phui/object-item/phui-oi-flush-ui.css' => '9d9685d6',
'rsrc/css/phui/object-item/phui-oi-list-view.css' => '7c5c1291',
'rsrc/css/phui/object-item/phui-oi-simple-ui.css' => 'a8beebea',
'rsrc/css/phui/phui-action-list.css' => '0bcd9a45',
'rsrc/css/phui/phui-action-panel.css' => 'b4798122',
'rsrc/css/phui/phui-badge.css' => '22c0cf4f',
'rsrc/css/phui/phui-basic-nav-view.css' => '98c11ab3',
'rsrc/css/phui/phui-big-info-view.css' => 'acc3492c',
'rsrc/css/phui/phui-box.css' => '4bd6cdb9',
'rsrc/css/phui/phui-bulk-editor.css' => '9a81e5d5',
'rsrc/css/phui/phui-chart.css' => '6bf6f78e',
'rsrc/css/phui/phui-cms.css' => '504b4b23',
'rsrc/css/phui/phui-comment-form.css' => 'ac68149f',
'rsrc/css/phui/phui-comment-panel.css' => 'f50152ad',
'rsrc/css/phui/phui-crumbs-view.css' => '10728aaa',
'rsrc/css/phui/phui-curtain-view.css' => '2bdaf026',
'rsrc/css/phui/phui-document-pro.css' => 'dd79b5df',
'rsrc/css/phui/phui-document-summary.css' => '9ca48bdf',
'rsrc/css/phui/phui-document.css' => 'c4ac41f9',
'rsrc/css/phui/phui-feed-story.css' => '44a9c8e9',
'rsrc/css/phui/phui-fontkit.css' => '1320ed01',
'rsrc/css/phui/phui-form-view.css' => 'b04e08d9',
'rsrc/css/phui/phui-form.css' => '7aaa04e3',
'rsrc/css/phui/phui-head-thing.css' => 'fd311e5f',
'rsrc/css/phui/phui-header-view.css' => '1ba8b707',
'rsrc/css/phui/phui-hovercard.css' => '4a484541',
'rsrc/css/phui/phui-icon-set-selector.css' => '87db8fee',
'rsrc/css/phui/phui-icon.css' => 'cf24ceec',
'rsrc/css/phui/phui-image-mask.css' => 'a8498f9c',
'rsrc/css/phui/phui-info-view.css' => 'e929f98c',
'rsrc/css/phui/phui-invisible-character-view.css' => '6993d9f0',
'rsrc/css/phui/phui-left-right.css' => '75227a4d',
'rsrc/css/phui/phui-lightbox.css' => '0a035e40',
'rsrc/css/phui/phui-list.css' => '38f8c9bd',
'rsrc/css/phui/phui-object-box.css' => '9cff003c',
'rsrc/css/phui/phui-pager.css' => 'edcbc226',
'rsrc/css/phui/phui-pinboard-view.css' => '2495140e',
'rsrc/css/phui/phui-property-list-view.css' => '546a04ae',
'rsrc/css/phui/phui-remarkup-preview.css' => '54a34863',
'rsrc/css/phui/phui-segment-bar-view.css' => 'b1d1b892',
'rsrc/css/phui/phui-spacing.css' => '042804d6',
'rsrc/css/phui/phui-status.css' => 'd5263e49',
'rsrc/css/phui/phui-tag-view.css' => 'b4719c50',
'rsrc/css/phui/phui-timeline-view.css' => '6ddf8126',
'rsrc/css/phui/phui-two-column-view.css' => '44ec4951',
'rsrc/css/phui/workboards/phui-workboard-color.css' => '783cdff5',
'rsrc/css/phui/workboards/phui-workboard.css' => '3bc85455',
'rsrc/css/phui/workboards/phui-workcard.css' => 'cca5fa92',
'rsrc/css/phui/workboards/phui-workpanel.css' => 'a3a63478',
'rsrc/css/sprite-login.css' => '396f3c3a',
'rsrc/css/sprite-tokens.css' => '9cdfd599',
'rsrc/css/syntax/syntax-default.css' => '9923583c',
'rsrc/externals/d3/d3.min.js' => 'a11a5ff2',
'rsrc/externals/font/fontawesome/fontawesome-webfont.eot' => '24a7064f',
'rsrc/externals/font/fontawesome/fontawesome-webfont.ttf' => '0039fe26',
'rsrc/externals/font/fontawesome/fontawesome-webfont.woff' => 'de978a43',
'rsrc/externals/font/fontawesome/fontawesome-webfont.woff2' => '2a832057',
'rsrc/externals/font/lato/lato-bold.eot' => '99fbcf8c',
'rsrc/externals/font/lato/lato-bold.svg' => '2aa83045',
'rsrc/externals/font/lato/lato-bold.ttf' => '0a7141f7',
'rsrc/externals/font/lato/lato-bold.woff' => 'f5db2061',
'rsrc/externals/font/lato/lato-bold.woff2' => '37a94ecd',
'rsrc/externals/font/lato/lato-bolditalic.eot' => 'b93389d0',
'rsrc/externals/font/lato/lato-bolditalic.svg' => '5442e1ef',
'rsrc/externals/font/lato/lato-bolditalic.ttf' => 'dad31252',
'rsrc/externals/font/lato/lato-bolditalic.woff' => 'e53bcf47',
'rsrc/externals/font/lato/lato-bolditalic.woff2' => 'd035007f',
'rsrc/externals/font/lato/lato-italic.eot' => '6a903f5d',
'rsrc/externals/font/lato/lato-italic.svg' => '0dc7cf2f',
'rsrc/externals/font/lato/lato-italic.ttf' => '629f64f0',
'rsrc/externals/font/lato/lato-italic.woff' => '678dc4bb',
'rsrc/externals/font/lato/lato-italic.woff2' => '7c8dd650',
'rsrc/externals/font/lato/lato-regular.eot' => '848dfb1e',
'rsrc/externals/font/lato/lato-regular.svg' => 'cbd5fd6b',
'rsrc/externals/font/lato/lato-regular.ttf' => 'e270165b',
'rsrc/externals/font/lato/lato-regular.woff' => '13d39fe2',
'rsrc/externals/font/lato/lato-regular.woff2' => '57a9f742',
'rsrc/externals/javelin/core/Event.js' => 'ef7e057f',
Emit a "Content-Security-Policy" HTTP header Summary: See PHI399. Ref T4340. This header provides an additional layer of protection against various attacks, including XSS attacks which embed inline `<script ...>` or `onhover="..."` content into the document. **style-src**: The "unsafe-inline" directive affects both `style="..."` and `<style>`. We use a lot of `style="..."`, some very legitimately, so we can't realistically get away from this any time soon. We only use one `<style>` (for monospaced font preferences) but can't disable `<style>` without disabling `style="..."`. **img-src**: We use "data:" URIs to inline small images into CSS, and there's a significant performance benefit from doing this. There doesn't seem to be a way to allow "data" URIs in CSS without allowing them in the document itself. **script-src** and **frame-src**: For a small number of flows (Recaptcha, Stripe) we embed external javascript, some of which embeds child elements (or additional resources) into the document. We now whitelist these narrowly on the respective pages. This won't work with Quicksand, so I've blacklisted it for now. **connect-src**: We need to include `'self'` for AJAX to work, and any websocket URIs. **Clickjacking**: We now have three layers of protection: - X-Frame-Options: works in older browsers. - `frame-ancestors 'none'`: does the same thing. - Explicit framebust in JX.Stratcom after initialization: works in ancient IE. We could probably drop the explicit framebust but it wasn't difficult to retain. **script tags**: We previously used an inline `<script>` tag to start Javelin. I've moved this to `<data data-javelin-init ...>` tags, which seems to work properly. **`__DEV__`**: We previously used an inline `<script>` tag to set the `__DEV__` mode flag. I tried using the "initialization" tags for this, but they fire too late. I moved it to `<html data-developer-mode="1">`, which seems OK everywhere. **CSP Scope**: Only the CSP header on the original request appears to matter -- you can't refine the scope by emitting headers on CSS/JS. To reduce confusion, I disabled the headers on those response types. More headers could be disabled, although we're likely already deep in the land of diminishing returns. **Initialization**: The initialization sequence has changed slightly. Previously, we waited for the <script> in bottom of the document to evaluate. Now, we go fishing for tags when domcontentready fires. Test Plan: - Browsed around in Firefox, Safari and Chrome looking for console warnings. Interacted with various Javascript behaviors. Enabled Quicksand. - Disabled all the framebusting, launched a clickjacking attack, verified that each layer of protection is individually effective. - Verified that the XHProf iframe in Darkconsole and the PHPAST frame layout work properly. - Enabled notifications, verified no complaints about connecting to Aphlict. - Hit `__DEV__` mode warnings based on the new data attribute. - Tried to do sketchy stuff with `data:` URIs and SVGs. This works but doesn't seem to be able to do anything dangerous. - Went through the Stripe and Recaptcha workflows. - Dumped and examined the CSP headers with `curl`, etc. - Added a raw <script> tag to a page (as though I'd found an XSS attack), verified it was no longer executed. Maniphest Tasks: T4340 Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D19143
2018-02-27 15:56:15 +01:00
'rsrc/externals/javelin/core/Stratcom.js' => '327f418a',
'rsrc/externals/javelin/core/__tests__/event-stop-and-kill.js' => '717554e4',
'rsrc/externals/javelin/core/__tests__/install.js' => 'c432ee85',
'rsrc/externals/javelin/core/__tests__/stratcom.js' => '88bf7313',
'rsrc/externals/javelin/core/__tests__/util.js' => 'e251703d',
'rsrc/externals/javelin/core/init.js' => '8d83d2a1',
'rsrc/externals/javelin/core/init_node.js' => 'f7732951',
'rsrc/externals/javelin/core/install.js' => '05270951',
'rsrc/externals/javelin/core/util.js' => '93cc50d6',
Introduce CAN_EDIT for ExternalAccount, and make CAN_VIEW more liberal Summary: Fixes T3732. Ref T1205. Ref T3116. External accounts (like emails used as identities, Facebook accounts, LDAP accounts, etc.) are stored in "ExternalAccount" objects. Currently, we have a very restrictive `CAN_VIEW` policy for ExternalAccounts, to add an extra layer of protection to make sure users can't use them in unintended ways. For example, it would be bad if a user could link their Phabricator account to a Facebook account without proper authentication. All of the controllers which do sensitive things have checks anyway, but a restrictive CAN_VIEW provided an extra layer of protection. Se T3116 for some discussion. However, this means that when grey/external users take actions (via email, or via applications like Legalpad) other users can't load the account handles and can't see anything about the actor (they just see "Restricted External Account" or similar). Balancing these concerns is mostly about not making a huge mess while doing it. This seems like a reasonable approach: - Add `CAN_EDIT` on these objects. - Make that very restricted, but open up `CAN_VIEW`. - Require `CAN_EDIT` any time we're going to do something authentication/identity related. This is slightly easier to get wrong (forget CAN_EDIT) than other approaches, but pretty simple, and we always have extra checks in place anyway -- this is just a safety net. I'm not quite sure how we should identify external accounts, so for now we're just rendering "Email User" or similar -- clearly not a bug, but not identifying. We can figure out what to render in the long term elsewhere. Test Plan: - Viewed external accounts. - Linked an external account. - Refreshed an external account. - Edited profile picture. - Viewed sessions panel. - Published a bunch of stuff to Asana/JIRA. - Legalpad signature page now shows external accounts. {F171595} Reviewers: chad, btrahan Reviewed By: btrahan Subscribers: epriestley Maniphest Tasks: T3732, T1205, T3116 Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D9767
2014-07-10 19:18:10 +02:00
'rsrc/externals/javelin/docs/Base.js' => '74676256',
'rsrc/externals/javelin/docs/onload.js' => 'e819c479',
'rsrc/externals/javelin/ext/fx/Color.js' => '7e41274a',
'rsrc/externals/javelin/ext/fx/FX.js' => '54b612ba',
'rsrc/externals/javelin/ext/reactor/core/DynVal.js' => 'f6555212',
'rsrc/externals/javelin/ext/reactor/core/Reactor.js' => '2b8de964',
'rsrc/externals/javelin/ext/reactor/core/ReactorNode.js' => '1ad0a787',
'rsrc/externals/javelin/ext/reactor/core/ReactorNodeCalmer.js' => '76f4ebed',
'rsrc/externals/javelin/ext/reactor/dom/RDOM.js' => 'c90a04fc',
'rsrc/externals/javelin/ext/view/HTMLView.js' => 'fe287620',
'rsrc/externals/javelin/ext/view/View.js' => '0f764c35',
'rsrc/externals/javelin/ext/view/ViewInterpreter.js' => 'f829edb3',
'rsrc/externals/javelin/ext/view/ViewPlaceholder.js' => '47830651',
'rsrc/externals/javelin/ext/view/ViewRenderer.js' => '6c2b09a2',
'rsrc/externals/javelin/ext/view/ViewVisitor.js' => 'efe49472',
'rsrc/externals/javelin/ext/view/__tests__/HTMLView.js' => 'f92d7bcb',
'rsrc/externals/javelin/ext/view/__tests__/View.js' => '6450b38b',
'rsrc/externals/javelin/ext/view/__tests__/ViewInterpreter.js' => '7a94d6a5',
'rsrc/externals/javelin/ext/view/__tests__/ViewRenderer.js' => '6ea96ac9',
'rsrc/externals/javelin/lib/Cookie.js' => '62dfea03',
'rsrc/externals/javelin/lib/DOM.js' => '4976858c',
'rsrc/externals/javelin/lib/History.js' => 'd4505101',
Introduce CAN_EDIT for ExternalAccount, and make CAN_VIEW more liberal Summary: Fixes T3732. Ref T1205. Ref T3116. External accounts (like emails used as identities, Facebook accounts, LDAP accounts, etc.) are stored in "ExternalAccount" objects. Currently, we have a very restrictive `CAN_VIEW` policy for ExternalAccounts, to add an extra layer of protection to make sure users can't use them in unintended ways. For example, it would be bad if a user could link their Phabricator account to a Facebook account without proper authentication. All of the controllers which do sensitive things have checks anyway, but a restrictive CAN_VIEW provided an extra layer of protection. Se T3116 for some discussion. However, this means that when grey/external users take actions (via email, or via applications like Legalpad) other users can't load the account handles and can't see anything about the actor (they just see "Restricted External Account" or similar). Balancing these concerns is mostly about not making a huge mess while doing it. This seems like a reasonable approach: - Add `CAN_EDIT` on these objects. - Make that very restricted, but open up `CAN_VIEW`. - Require `CAN_EDIT` any time we're going to do something authentication/identity related. This is slightly easier to get wrong (forget CAN_EDIT) than other approaches, but pretty simple, and we always have extra checks in place anyway -- this is just a safety net. I'm not quite sure how we should identify external accounts, so for now we're just rendering "Email User" or similar -- clearly not a bug, but not identifying. We can figure out what to render in the long term elsewhere. Test Plan: - Viewed external accounts. - Linked an external account. - Refreshed an external account. - Edited profile picture. - Viewed sessions panel. - Published a bunch of stuff to Asana/JIRA. - Legalpad signature page now shows external accounts. {F171595} Reviewers: chad, btrahan Reviewed By: btrahan Subscribers: epriestley Maniphest Tasks: T3732, T1205, T3116 Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D9767
2014-07-10 19:18:10 +02:00
'rsrc/externals/javelin/lib/JSON.js' => '69adf288',
'rsrc/externals/javelin/lib/Leader.js' => '7f243deb',
Introduce CAN_EDIT for ExternalAccount, and make CAN_VIEW more liberal Summary: Fixes T3732. Ref T1205. Ref T3116. External accounts (like emails used as identities, Facebook accounts, LDAP accounts, etc.) are stored in "ExternalAccount" objects. Currently, we have a very restrictive `CAN_VIEW` policy for ExternalAccounts, to add an extra layer of protection to make sure users can't use them in unintended ways. For example, it would be bad if a user could link their Phabricator account to a Facebook account without proper authentication. All of the controllers which do sensitive things have checks anyway, but a restrictive CAN_VIEW provided an extra layer of protection. Se T3116 for some discussion. However, this means that when grey/external users take actions (via email, or via applications like Legalpad) other users can't load the account handles and can't see anything about the actor (they just see "Restricted External Account" or similar). Balancing these concerns is mostly about not making a huge mess while doing it. This seems like a reasonable approach: - Add `CAN_EDIT` on these objects. - Make that very restricted, but open up `CAN_VIEW`. - Require `CAN_EDIT` any time we're going to do something authentication/identity related. This is slightly easier to get wrong (forget CAN_EDIT) than other approaches, but pretty simple, and we always have extra checks in place anyway -- this is just a safety net. I'm not quite sure how we should identify external accounts, so for now we're just rendering "Email User" or similar -- clearly not a bug, but not identifying. We can figure out what to render in the long term elsewhere. Test Plan: - Viewed external accounts. - Linked an external account. - Refreshed an external account. - Edited profile picture. - Viewed sessions panel. - Published a bunch of stuff to Asana/JIRA. - Legalpad signature page now shows external accounts. {F171595} Reviewers: chad, btrahan Reviewed By: btrahan Subscribers: epriestley Maniphest Tasks: T3732, T1205, T3116 Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D9767
2014-07-10 19:18:10 +02:00
'rsrc/externals/javelin/lib/Mask.js' => '8a41885b',
When logged-out users hit a "Login Required" dialog, try to choose a better "next" URI Summary: Ref T10004. After a user logs in, we send them to the "next" URI cookie if there is one, but currently don't always do a very good job of selecting a "next" URI, especially if they tried to do something with a dialog before being asked to log in. In particular, if a logged-out user clicks an action like "Edit Blocking Tasks" on a Maniphest task, the default behavior is to send them to the standalone page for that dialog after they log in. This can be pretty confusing. See T2691 and D6416 for earlier efforts here. At that time, we added a mechanism to //manually// override the default behavior, and fixed the most common links. This worked, but I'd like to fix the //default// beahvior so we don't need to remember to `setObjectURI()` correctly all over the place. ApplicationEditor has also introduced new cases which are more difficult to get right. While we could get them right by using the override and being careful about things, this also motivates fixing the default behavior. Finally, we have better tools for fixing the default behavior now than we did in 2013. Instead of using manual overrides, have JS include an "X-Phabricator-Via" header in Ajax requests. This is basically like a referrer header, and will contain the page the user's browser is on. In essentially every case, this should be a very good place (and often the best place) to send them after login. For all pages currently using `setObjectURI()`, it should produce the same behavior by default. I'll remove the `setObjectURI()` mechanism in the next diff. Test Plan: Clicked various workflow actions while logged out, saw "next" get set to a reasonable value, was redirected to a sensible, non-confusing page after login (the page with whatever button I clicked on it). Reviewers: chad Reviewed By: chad Maniphest Tasks: T10004 Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D14804
2015-12-17 15:10:04 +01:00
'rsrc/externals/javelin/lib/Quicksand.js' => '6b8ef10b',
'rsrc/externals/javelin/lib/Request.js' => '94b750d2',
'rsrc/externals/javelin/lib/Resource.js' => '44959b73',
Provide a global router for Ajax requests Summary: Fixes T430. Fixes T4834. Obsoletes D7641. Currently, we do some things less-well than we could: - We just let the browser queue and prioritize requests, so if you load a revision with 50 changes and then click "Award Token", the action blocks until the changes load in most/all browsers. It would be better to prioritize this action and queue it immediately. - Similarly, changes tend to load in order, even if the user has clicked to a specific file. When the user expresses a preference for a specific file, we should prioritize it. - We show a spinning GIF when waiting on requests. This is appropriate for some types of reuqests, but distracting for others. To fix this: - Queue all (or, at least, most) requests into a new queue in JX.Router. - JX.Router handles prioritizing the requests. Principally: - You can submit a request with a specific priority (500 = general content loading, 1000 = default, 2000 = explicit user action) and JX.Router will get the higher stuff fired off sooner. - You can name requests and then adjust their prorities later, if the user expresses an interest in specific results. - Only use the spinner gif for "workflow" requests, which is bascially when the user clicked something and we're waiting on the server. I think it's useful and not-annoying in this case. - Don't show any status for draft requests. - For content requests, show a subtle hipster-style top loading bar. Test Plan: - Viewed a diff with 93 changes, and clicked award token. - Prior to this patch, the action took many many seconds to resolve. - After this patch, it resolves quickly. - Viewed a diff with 93 changes and saw a pleasant subtle hipster-style loading bar. - Viewed a diff with 93 changes and typed some draft text. Previews populated fairly quickly and there was no spinner. - Viewed a diff with 93 changes and clicked something with workflow, saw a spinner after a moment. - Viewed a diff with 93 changes and clicked a file in the table of contents near the end of the list. - Prior to this patch, it took a long time to show up. - After this patch, it loads directly. Reviewers: chad, btrahan Reviewed By: btrahan Subscribers: epriestley Maniphest Tasks: T430, T4834 Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D8979
2014-05-05 19:57:42 +02:00
'rsrc/externals/javelin/lib/Routable.js' => 'b3e7d692',
'rsrc/externals/javelin/lib/Router.js' => '29274e2b',
'rsrc/externals/javelin/lib/Scrollbar.js' => '9065f639',
'rsrc/externals/javelin/lib/Sound.js' => '949c0fe5',
When logged-out users hit a "Login Required" dialog, try to choose a better "next" URI Summary: Ref T10004. After a user logs in, we send them to the "next" URI cookie if there is one, but currently don't always do a very good job of selecting a "next" URI, especially if they tried to do something with a dialog before being asked to log in. In particular, if a logged-out user clicks an action like "Edit Blocking Tasks" on a Maniphest task, the default behavior is to send them to the standalone page for that dialog after they log in. This can be pretty confusing. See T2691 and D6416 for earlier efforts here. At that time, we added a mechanism to //manually// override the default behavior, and fixed the most common links. This worked, but I'd like to fix the //default// beahvior so we don't need to remember to `setObjectURI()` correctly all over the place. ApplicationEditor has also introduced new cases which are more difficult to get right. While we could get them right by using the override and being careful about things, this also motivates fixing the default behavior. Finally, we have better tools for fixing the default behavior now than we did in 2013. Instead of using manual overrides, have JS include an "X-Phabricator-Via" header in Ajax requests. This is basically like a referrer header, and will contain the page the user's browser is on. In essentially every case, this should be a very good place (and often the best place) to send them after login. For all pages currently using `setObjectURI()`, it should produce the same behavior by default. I'll remove the `setObjectURI()` mechanism in the next diff. Test Plan: Clicked various workflow actions while logged out, saw "next" get set to a reasonable value, was redirected to a sensible, non-confusing page after login (the page with whatever button I clicked on it). Reviewers: chad Reviewed By: chad Maniphest Tasks: T10004 Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D14804
2015-12-17 15:10:04 +01:00
'rsrc/externals/javelin/lib/URI.js' => 'c989ade3',
'rsrc/externals/javelin/lib/Vector.js' => '2caa8fb8',
'rsrc/externals/javelin/lib/WebSocket.js' => '3ffe32d6',
'rsrc/externals/javelin/lib/Workflow.js' => '6a726c55',
'rsrc/externals/javelin/lib/__tests__/Cookie.js' => '5ed109e8',
'rsrc/externals/javelin/lib/__tests__/DOM.js' => 'c984504b',
'rsrc/externals/javelin/lib/__tests__/JSON.js' => '837a7d68',
'rsrc/externals/javelin/lib/__tests__/URI.js' => '1e45fda9',
'rsrc/externals/javelin/lib/__tests__/behavior.js' => '1ea62783',
Introduce CAN_EDIT for ExternalAccount, and make CAN_VIEW more liberal Summary: Fixes T3732. Ref T1205. Ref T3116. External accounts (like emails used as identities, Facebook accounts, LDAP accounts, etc.) are stored in "ExternalAccount" objects. Currently, we have a very restrictive `CAN_VIEW` policy for ExternalAccounts, to add an extra layer of protection to make sure users can't use them in unintended ways. For example, it would be bad if a user could link their Phabricator account to a Facebook account without proper authentication. All of the controllers which do sensitive things have checks anyway, but a restrictive CAN_VIEW provided an extra layer of protection. Se T3116 for some discussion. However, this means that when grey/external users take actions (via email, or via applications like Legalpad) other users can't load the account handles and can't see anything about the actor (they just see "Restricted External Account" or similar). Balancing these concerns is mostly about not making a huge mess while doing it. This seems like a reasonable approach: - Add `CAN_EDIT` on these objects. - Make that very restricted, but open up `CAN_VIEW`. - Require `CAN_EDIT` any time we're going to do something authentication/identity related. This is slightly easier to get wrong (forget CAN_EDIT) than other approaches, but pretty simple, and we always have extra checks in place anyway -- this is just a safety net. I'm not quite sure how we should identify external accounts, so for now we're just rendering "Email User" or similar -- clearly not a bug, but not identifying. We can figure out what to render in the long term elsewhere. Test Plan: - Viewed external accounts. - Linked an external account. - Refreshed an external account. - Edited profile picture. - Viewed sessions panel. - Published a bunch of stuff to Asana/JIRA. - Legalpad signature page now shows external accounts. {F171595} Reviewers: chad, btrahan Reviewed By: btrahan Subscribers: epriestley Maniphest Tasks: T3732, T1205, T3116 Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D9767
2014-07-10 19:18:10 +02:00
'rsrc/externals/javelin/lib/behavior.js' => '61cbc29a',
'rsrc/externals/javelin/lib/control/tokenizer/Tokenizer.js' => 'bb6e5c16',
'rsrc/externals/javelin/lib/control/typeahead/Typeahead.js' => '70baed2f',
'rsrc/externals/javelin/lib/control/typeahead/normalizer/TypeaheadNormalizer.js' => '185bbd53',
Introduce CAN_EDIT for ExternalAccount, and make CAN_VIEW more liberal Summary: Fixes T3732. Ref T1205. Ref T3116. External accounts (like emails used as identities, Facebook accounts, LDAP accounts, etc.) are stored in "ExternalAccount" objects. Currently, we have a very restrictive `CAN_VIEW` policy for ExternalAccounts, to add an extra layer of protection to make sure users can't use them in unintended ways. For example, it would be bad if a user could link their Phabricator account to a Facebook account without proper authentication. All of the controllers which do sensitive things have checks anyway, but a restrictive CAN_VIEW provided an extra layer of protection. Se T3116 for some discussion. However, this means that when grey/external users take actions (via email, or via applications like Legalpad) other users can't load the account handles and can't see anything about the actor (they just see "Restricted External Account" or similar). Balancing these concerns is mostly about not making a huge mess while doing it. This seems like a reasonable approach: - Add `CAN_EDIT` on these objects. - Make that very restricted, but open up `CAN_VIEW`. - Require `CAN_EDIT` any time we're going to do something authentication/identity related. This is slightly easier to get wrong (forget CAN_EDIT) than other approaches, but pretty simple, and we always have extra checks in place anyway -- this is just a safety net. I'm not quite sure how we should identify external accounts, so for now we're just rendering "Email User" or similar -- clearly not a bug, but not identifying. We can figure out what to render in the long term elsewhere. Test Plan: - Viewed external accounts. - Linked an external account. - Refreshed an external account. - Edited profile picture. - Viewed sessions panel. - Published a bunch of stuff to Asana/JIRA. - Legalpad signature page now shows external accounts. {F171595} Reviewers: chad, btrahan Reviewed By: btrahan Subscribers: epriestley Maniphest Tasks: T3732, T1205, T3116 Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D9767
2014-07-10 19:18:10 +02:00
'rsrc/externals/javelin/lib/control/typeahead/source/TypeaheadCompositeSource.js' => '503e17fd',
'rsrc/externals/javelin/lib/control/typeahead/source/TypeaheadOnDemandSource.js' => '013ffff9',
Introduce CAN_EDIT for ExternalAccount, and make CAN_VIEW more liberal Summary: Fixes T3732. Ref T1205. Ref T3116. External accounts (like emails used as identities, Facebook accounts, LDAP accounts, etc.) are stored in "ExternalAccount" objects. Currently, we have a very restrictive `CAN_VIEW` policy for ExternalAccounts, to add an extra layer of protection to make sure users can't use them in unintended ways. For example, it would be bad if a user could link their Phabricator account to a Facebook account without proper authentication. All of the controllers which do sensitive things have checks anyway, but a restrictive CAN_VIEW provided an extra layer of protection. Se T3116 for some discussion. However, this means that when grey/external users take actions (via email, or via applications like Legalpad) other users can't load the account handles and can't see anything about the actor (they just see "Restricted External Account" or similar). Balancing these concerns is mostly about not making a huge mess while doing it. This seems like a reasonable approach: - Add `CAN_EDIT` on these objects. - Make that very restricted, but open up `CAN_VIEW`. - Require `CAN_EDIT` any time we're going to do something authentication/identity related. This is slightly easier to get wrong (forget CAN_EDIT) than other approaches, but pretty simple, and we always have extra checks in place anyway -- this is just a safety net. I'm not quite sure how we should identify external accounts, so for now we're just rendering "Email User" or similar -- clearly not a bug, but not identifying. We can figure out what to render in the long term elsewhere. Test Plan: - Viewed external accounts. - Linked an external account. - Refreshed an external account. - Edited profile picture. - Viewed sessions panel. - Published a bunch of stuff to Asana/JIRA. - Legalpad signature page now shows external accounts. {F171595} Reviewers: chad, btrahan Reviewed By: btrahan Subscribers: epriestley Maniphest Tasks: T3732, T1205, T3116 Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D9767
2014-07-10 19:18:10 +02:00
'rsrc/externals/javelin/lib/control/typeahead/source/TypeaheadPreloadedSource.js' => '54f314a0',
'rsrc/externals/javelin/lib/control/typeahead/source/TypeaheadSource.js' => 'ab9e0a82',
'rsrc/externals/javelin/lib/control/typeahead/source/TypeaheadStaticSource.js' => '6c0e62fa',
'rsrc/favicons/favicon-16x16.png' => 'fc6275ba',
'rsrc/favicons/mask-icon.svg' => 'e132a80f',
'rsrc/image/BFCFDA.png' => 'd5ec91f4',
'rsrc/image/actions/edit.png' => '2fc41442',
'rsrc/image/avatar.png' => '17d346a4',
'rsrc/image/checker_dark.png' => 'd8e65881',
'rsrc/image/checker_light.png' => 'a0155918',
'rsrc/image/checker_lighter.png' => 'd5da91b6',
'rsrc/image/controls/checkbox-checked.png' => 'ad6441ea',
'rsrc/image/controls/checkbox-unchecked.png' => '8eb1f0ae',
'rsrc/image/d5d8e1.png' => '0c2a1497',
'rsrc/image/darkload.gif' => '1ffd3ec6',
'rsrc/image/divot.png' => '94dded62',
'rsrc/image/examples/hero.png' => '979a86ae',
'rsrc/image/grippy_texture.png' => 'aca81e2f',
'rsrc/image/icon/fatcow/arrow_branch.png' => '2537c01c',
'rsrc/image/icon/fatcow/arrow_merge.png' => '21b660e0',
'rsrc/image/icon/fatcow/calendar_edit.png' => '24632275',
'rsrc/image/icon/fatcow/document_black.png' => '45fe1c60',
'rsrc/image/icon/fatcow/flag_blue.png' => 'a01abb1d',
'rsrc/image/icon/fatcow/flag_finish.png' => '67825cee',
'rsrc/image/icon/fatcow/flag_ghost.png' => '20ca8783',
'rsrc/image/icon/fatcow/flag_green.png' => '7e0eaa7a',
'rsrc/image/icon/fatcow/flag_orange.png' => '9e73df66',
'rsrc/image/icon/fatcow/flag_pink.png' => '7e92f3b2',
'rsrc/image/icon/fatcow/flag_purple.png' => 'cc517522',
'rsrc/image/icon/fatcow/flag_red.png' => '04ec726f',
'rsrc/image/icon/fatcow/flag_yellow.png' => '73946fd4',
'rsrc/image/icon/fatcow/key_question.png' => '52a0c26a',
'rsrc/image/icon/fatcow/link.png' => '7afd4d5e',
'rsrc/image/icon/fatcow/page_white_edit.png' => '39a2eed8',
'rsrc/image/icon/fatcow/page_white_put.png' => '08c95a0c',
'rsrc/image/icon/fatcow/source/conduit.png' => '4ea01d2f',
'rsrc/image/icon/fatcow/source/email.png' => '9bab3239',
'rsrc/image/icon/fatcow/source/fax.png' => '04195e68',
'rsrc/image/icon/fatcow/source/mobile.png' => 'f1321264',
'rsrc/image/icon/fatcow/source/tablet.png' => '49396799',
'rsrc/image/icon/fatcow/source/web.png' => '136ccb5d',
'rsrc/image/icon/subscribe.png' => 'd03ed5a5',
'rsrc/image/icon/tango/attachment.png' => 'ecc8022e',
'rsrc/image/icon/tango/edit.png' => '929a1363',
'rsrc/image/icon/tango/go-down.png' => '96d95e43',
'rsrc/image/icon/tango/log.png' => 'b08cc63a',
'rsrc/image/icon/tango/upload.png' => '7bbb7984',
'rsrc/image/icon/unsubscribe.png' => '25725013',
'rsrc/image/lightblue-header.png' => '5c168b6d',
'rsrc/image/logo/light-eye.png' => '1a576ddd',
'rsrc/image/main_texture.png' => '29a2c5ad',
'rsrc/image/menu_texture.png' => '5a17580d',
'rsrc/image/people/harding.png' => '45aa614e',
'rsrc/image/people/jefferson.png' => 'afca0e53',
'rsrc/image/people/lincoln.png' => '9369126d',
'rsrc/image/people/mckinley.png' => 'fb8f16ce',
'rsrc/image/people/taft.png' => 'd7bc402c',
'rsrc/image/people/user0.png' => '03dacaea',
'rsrc/image/people/user1.png' => '4a4e7702',
'rsrc/image/people/user2.png' => '47a0ee40',
'rsrc/image/people/user3.png' => '835ff627',
'rsrc/image/people/user4.png' => 'b0e830f1',
'rsrc/image/people/user5.png' => '9c95b369',
'rsrc/image/people/user6.png' => 'ba3fbfb0',
'rsrc/image/people/user7.png' => 'da613924',
'rsrc/image/people/user8.png' => 'f1035edf',
'rsrc/image/people/user9.png' => '66730be3',
'rsrc/image/people/washington.png' => '40dd301c',
'rsrc/image/phrequent_active.png' => 'a466a8ed',
'rsrc/image/phrequent_inactive.png' => 'bfc15a69',
'rsrc/image/resize.png' => 'fd476de4',
'rsrc/image/sprite-login-X2.png' => '308c92c4',
'rsrc/image/sprite-login.png' => '9ec54245',
'rsrc/image/sprite-tokens-X2.png' => '804a5232',
'rsrc/image/sprite-tokens.png' => 'b41d03da',
'rsrc/image/texture/card-gradient.png' => '815f26e8',
'rsrc/image/texture/dark-menu-hover.png' => '5fa7ece8',
'rsrc/image/texture/dark-menu.png' => '7e22296e',
'rsrc/image/texture/grip.png' => '719404f3',
'rsrc/image/texture/panel-header-gradient.png' => 'e3b8dcfe',
'rsrc/image/texture/phlnx-bg.png' => '8d819209',
'rsrc/image/texture/pholio-background.gif' => 'ba29239c',
'rsrc/image/texture/table_header.png' => '5c433037',
'rsrc/image/texture/table_header_hover.png' => '038ec3b9',
'rsrc/image/texture/table_header_tall.png' => 'd56b434f',
Fix several duplication/replay behaviors in Aphlict Summary: Ref T12566. Ref T12563. This fixes three bugs with Aphlict replay stuff: First, Conphernece would try to repaint the UI even if no thread was open. Only repaint when a thread is open. Second, although we deduplicate JX.Leader messages, we didn't deduplicate actual notification messages. If you browsed the leader window, then it re-elected itelf as a leader and replayed history, it could rebroadcast notifications and other windows could show doubles. Deduplicate notifications to prevent this. Third, we always replayed the last 60 seconds of history. When you browsed the leader window, whichever window became the new leader (possibly the one you just browsed) could replay messages from before it had opened, leading to duplicate messages. Particularly, after receiving a message and then browsing you could see that message again. Instead, only replay history as far back as when the window first opened. Test Plan: - Clicked "Repaint" with a thread open, saw a repaint. Clicked "Repaint" with Conpherence open but no thread, no repaint and no 404 request to `/update/null/`. - In browser A, opened three windows. In browser B, sent a notification. In browser A, browsed the leader window away twice in a row. Observed that the window which never became a leader doesn't duplicate notifications. - In browser A, opened three windows. In browser B, sent a notification. In browser A, browsed the leader window away over and over again. Observed that replay requests issued with appropriate history windows. Reviewers: chad Reviewed By: chad Maniphest Tasks: T12566, T12563 Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D17722
2017-04-18 20:14:37 +02:00
'rsrc/js/application/aphlict/Aphlict.js' => 'e1d4b11a',
'rsrc/js/application/aphlict/behavior-aphlict-dropdown.js' => 'caade6f2',
'rsrc/js/application/aphlict/behavior-aphlict-listen.js' => '599a8f5f',
'rsrc/js/application/aphlict/behavior-aphlict-status.js' => '5e2634b9',
'rsrc/js/application/aphlict/behavior-desktop-notifications-control.js' => '27ca6289',
'rsrc/js/application/calendar/behavior-day-view.js' => '4b3c4443',
'rsrc/js/application/calendar/behavior-event-all-day.js' => 'b41537c9',
'rsrc/js/application/calendar/behavior-month-view.js' => 'fe33e256',
'rsrc/js/application/config/behavior-reorder-fields.js' => 'b6993408',
Fix several duplication/replay behaviors in Aphlict Summary: Ref T12566. Ref T12563. This fixes three bugs with Aphlict replay stuff: First, Conphernece would try to repaint the UI even if no thread was open. Only repaint when a thread is open. Second, although we deduplicate JX.Leader messages, we didn't deduplicate actual notification messages. If you browsed the leader window, then it re-elected itelf as a leader and replayed history, it could rebroadcast notifications and other windows could show doubles. Deduplicate notifications to prevent this. Third, we always replayed the last 60 seconds of history. When you browsed the leader window, whichever window became the new leader (possibly the one you just browsed) could replay messages from before it had opened, leading to duplicate messages. Particularly, after receiving a message and then browsing you could see that message again. Instead, only replay history as far back as when the window first opened. Test Plan: - Clicked "Repaint" with a thread open, saw a repaint. Clicked "Repaint" with Conpherence open but no thread, no repaint and no 404 request to `/update/null/`. - In browser A, opened three windows. In browser B, sent a notification. In browser A, browsed the leader window away twice in a row. Observed that the window which never became a leader doesn't duplicate notifications. - In browser A, opened three windows. In browser B, sent a notification. In browser A, browsed the leader window away over and over again. Observed that replay requests issued with appropriate history windows. Reviewers: chad Reviewed By: chad Maniphest Tasks: T12566, T12563 Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D17722
2017-04-18 20:14:37 +02:00
'rsrc/js/application/conpherence/ConpherenceThreadManager.js' => '4d863052',
'rsrc/js/application/conpherence/behavior-conpherence-search.js' => '9bbf3762',
'rsrc/js/application/conpherence/behavior-durable-column.js' => '2ae077e1',
'rsrc/js/application/conpherence/behavior-menu.js' => '4047cd35',
'rsrc/js/application/conpherence/behavior-participant-pane.js' => 'd057e45a',
'rsrc/js/application/conpherence/behavior-pontificate.js' => '55616e04',
'rsrc/js/application/conpherence/behavior-quicksand-blacklist.js' => '7927a7d3',
'rsrc/js/application/conpherence/behavior-toggle-widget.js' => '3dbf94d5',
'rsrc/js/application/countdown/timer.js' => 'e4cc26b3',
2015-06-23 22:43:47 +02:00
'rsrc/js/application/daemon/behavior-bulk-job-reload.js' => 'edf8a145',
'rsrc/js/application/dashboard/behavior-dashboard-async-panel.js' => '469c0d9e',
'rsrc/js/application/dashboard/behavior-dashboard-move-panels.js' => '408bf173',
'rsrc/js/application/dashboard/behavior-dashboard-query-panel-select.js' => '453c5375',
'rsrc/js/application/dashboard/behavior-dashboard-tab-panel.js' => 'd4eecc63',
'rsrc/js/application/diff/DiffChangeset.js' => 'b49b59d6',
'rsrc/js/application/diff/DiffChangesetList.js' => '0a84bcc1',
'rsrc/js/application/diff/DiffInline.js' => 'e83d28f3',
'rsrc/js/application/diff/behavior-preview-link.js' => '051c7832',
'rsrc/js/application/differential/behavior-diff-radios.js' => 'e1ff79b1',
'rsrc/js/application/differential/behavior-populate.js' => 'f0eb6708',
'rsrc/js/application/differential/behavior-user-select.js' => 'a8d8459d',
'rsrc/js/application/diffusion/DiffusionLocateFileSource.js' => '00676f00',
'rsrc/js/application/diffusion/behavior-audit-preview.js' => 'd835b03a',
'rsrc/js/application/diffusion/behavior-commit-branches.js' => 'bdaf4d04',
'rsrc/js/application/diffusion/behavior-commit-graph.js' => '75b83cbb',
'rsrc/js/application/diffusion/behavior-locate-file.js' => '6d3e1947',
'rsrc/js/application/diffusion/behavior-pull-lastmodified.js' => 'f01586dc',
'rsrc/js/application/doorkeeper/behavior-doorkeeper-tag.js' => '1db13e70',
'rsrc/js/application/drydock/drydock-live-operation-status.js' => '901935ef',
'rsrc/js/application/files/behavior-document-engine.js' => '3935d8c4',
'rsrc/js/application/files/behavior-icon-composer.js' => '8499b6ab',
'rsrc/js/application/files/behavior-launch-icon-composer.js' => '48086888',
'rsrc/js/application/harbormaster/behavior-harbormaster-log.js' => '549459b8',
'rsrc/js/application/herald/HeraldRuleEditor.js' => 'dca75c0e',
'rsrc/js/application/herald/PathTypeahead.js' => '6d8c7912',
'rsrc/js/application/herald/herald-rule-editor.js' => '7ebaeed3',
'rsrc/js/application/maniphest/behavior-batch-selector.js' => 'ad54037e',
'rsrc/js/application/maniphest/behavior-line-chart.js' => 'e4232876',
'rsrc/js/application/maniphest/behavior-list-edit.js' => 'a9f88de2',
'rsrc/js/application/maniphest/behavior-subpriorityeditor.js' => '71237763',
'rsrc/js/application/owners/OwnersPathEditor.js' => 'c96502cf',
'rsrc/js/application/owners/owners-path-editor.js' => '7a68dda3',
'rsrc/js/application/passphrase/passphrase-credential-control.js' => '3cb0b2fc',
'rsrc/js/application/pholio/behavior-pholio-mock-edit.js' => 'bee502c8',
'rsrc/js/application/pholio/behavior-pholio-mock-view.js' => 'ec1f3669',
'rsrc/js/application/phortune/behavior-stripe-payment-form.js' => 'a6b98425',
'rsrc/js/application/phortune/behavior-test-payment-form.js' => 'fc91ab6c',
'rsrc/js/application/phortune/phortune-credit-card-form.js' => '2290aeef',
'rsrc/js/application/policy/behavior-policy-control.js' => 'd0c516d5',
'rsrc/js/application/policy/behavior-policy-rule-editor.js' => '5e9f347c',
'rsrc/js/application/projects/WorkboardBoard.js' => '8935deef',
'rsrc/js/application/projects/WorkboardCard.js' => 'c587b80f',
'rsrc/js/application/projects/WorkboardColumn.js' => '758b4758',
'rsrc/js/application/projects/WorkboardController.js' => '26167537',
'rsrc/js/application/projects/behavior-project-boards.js' => '4250a34e',
'rsrc/js/application/projects/behavior-project-create.js' => '065227cc',
'rsrc/js/application/projects/behavior-reorder-columns.js' => 'e1d25dfb',
'rsrc/js/application/releeph/releeph-preview-branch.js' => 'b2b4fbaf',
'rsrc/js/application/releeph/releeph-request-state-change.js' => 'a0b57eb8',
Introduce CAN_EDIT for ExternalAccount, and make CAN_VIEW more liberal Summary: Fixes T3732. Ref T1205. Ref T3116. External accounts (like emails used as identities, Facebook accounts, LDAP accounts, etc.) are stored in "ExternalAccount" objects. Currently, we have a very restrictive `CAN_VIEW` policy for ExternalAccounts, to add an extra layer of protection to make sure users can't use them in unintended ways. For example, it would be bad if a user could link their Phabricator account to a Facebook account without proper authentication. All of the controllers which do sensitive things have checks anyway, but a restrictive CAN_VIEW provided an extra layer of protection. Se T3116 for some discussion. However, this means that when grey/external users take actions (via email, or via applications like Legalpad) other users can't load the account handles and can't see anything about the actor (they just see "Restricted External Account" or similar). Balancing these concerns is mostly about not making a huge mess while doing it. This seems like a reasonable approach: - Add `CAN_EDIT` on these objects. - Make that very restricted, but open up `CAN_VIEW`. - Require `CAN_EDIT` any time we're going to do something authentication/identity related. This is slightly easier to get wrong (forget CAN_EDIT) than other approaches, but pretty simple, and we always have extra checks in place anyway -- this is just a safety net. I'm not quite sure how we should identify external accounts, so for now we're just rendering "Email User" or similar -- clearly not a bug, but not identifying. We can figure out what to render in the long term elsewhere. Test Plan: - Viewed external accounts. - Linked an external account. - Refreshed an external account. - Edited profile picture. - Viewed sessions panel. - Published a bunch of stuff to Asana/JIRA. - Legalpad signature page now shows external accounts. {F171595} Reviewers: chad, btrahan Reviewed By: btrahan Subscribers: epriestley Maniphest Tasks: T3732, T1205, T3116 Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D9767
2014-07-10 19:18:10 +02:00
'rsrc/js/application/releeph/releeph-request-typeahead.js' => 'de2e896f',
'rsrc/js/application/repository/repository-crossreference.js' => '9a860428',
'rsrc/js/application/search/behavior-reorder-profile-menu-items.js' => 'e2e0a072',
'rsrc/js/application/search/behavior-reorder-queries.js' => 'e9581f08',
Pass timeline view data to comment previews, restoring Differential comment previews Summary: Ref T13222. In D19918, I refactored how timelines get "view data". Today, this is always additional data about which images/changesets/diffs are visible on the current revision/commit/mock, so we can tell if inline comments should be linked to a `#anchor` on the same page (if the inline is rendered there somewhere) or to a `/D123?id=1&vs=2` full link on a different page (if it isn't), but in general this could be any sort of state information about the current page that affects how the timeline should render. Previously, comment previews did not use any specialized object code and always rendered a "generic" timeline story. This was actually a bug, but none of the code we have today cares about this (since it's all inline related, and inlines render separately) so it never impacted anything. After the `TimelineEngine` change, the preview renders with Differential-specific code. This is more correct, but we were not passing the preview the "view data" so it broke. This preview doesn't actually need the view data and we could just make it bail out if it isn't present, but pass it through for consistency and so this works like we'd expect if we do something fancier with view data in the future. Test Plan: Viewed comment and inline comment previews in Differential, saw old behavior restored. Reviewers: amckinley Reviewed By: amckinley Maniphest Tasks: T13222 Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D19943
2019-01-03 01:48:53 +01:00
'rsrc/js/application/transactions/behavior-comment-actions.js' => 'd848ec84',
'rsrc/js/application/transactions/behavior-reorder-configs.js' => 'd7a74243',
'rsrc/js/application/transactions/behavior-reorder-fields.js' => 'b59e1e96',
Remove "willRenderTimeline()" from ApplicationTransactionInterface Summary: Depends on D19914. Ref T11351. Some of the Phoilo rabbit holes go very deep. `PhabricatorApplicationTransactionInterface` currently requires you to implement `willRenderTimeline()`. Almost every object just implements this as `return $timeline`; only Pholio, Diffusion, and Differential specialize it. In all cases, they are specializing it mostly to render inline comments. The actual implementations are a bit of a weird mess and the way the data is threaded through the call stack is weird and not very modern. Try to clean this up: - Stop requiring `willRenderTimeline()` to be implemented. - Stop requiring `getApplicationTransactionViewObject()` to be implemented (only the three above, plus Legalpad, implement this, and Legalpad's implementation is a no-op). These two methods are inherently pretty coupled for almost any reasonable thing you might want to do with the timeline. - Simplify the handling of "renderdata" and call it "View Data". This is additional information about the current view of the transaction timeline that is required to render it correctly. This is only used in Differential, to decide if we can link an inline comment to an anchor on the same page or should link it to another page. We could perhaps do this on the client instead, but having this data doesn't seem inherently bad to me. - If objects want to customize timeline rendering, they now implement `PhabricatorTimelineInterface` and provide a `TimelineEngine` which gets a nice formal stack. This leaves a lot of empty `willRenderTimeline()` implementations hanging around. I'll remove these in the next change, it's just going to be deleting a couple dozen copies of an identical empty method implementation. Test Plan: - Viewed audits, revisions, and mocks with inline comments. - Used "Show Older" to page a revision back in history (this is relevant for "View Data"). - Grepped for symbols: willRenderTimeline, getApplicationTransactionViewObject, Legalpad classes. Reviewers: amckinley Reviewed By: amckinley Maniphest Tasks: T11351 Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D19918
2018-12-19 20:52:53 +01:00
'rsrc/js/application/transactions/behavior-show-older-transactions.js' => '0e1eca96',
'rsrc/js/application/transactions/behavior-transaction-comment-form.js' => 'b23b49e6',
'rsrc/js/application/transactions/behavior-transaction-list.js' => '1f6794f6',
'rsrc/js/application/typeahead/behavior-typeahead-browse.js' => '635de1ec',
'rsrc/js/application/typeahead/behavior-typeahead-search.js' => '93d0c9e3',
'rsrc/js/application/uiexample/gesture-example.js' => '558829c2',
'rsrc/js/application/uiexample/notification-example.js' => '8ce821c5',
'rsrc/js/core/Busy.js' => '59a7976a',
'rsrc/js/core/DragAndDropFileUpload.js' => '58dea2fa',
'rsrc/js/core/DraggableList.js' => 'bea6e7f4',
'rsrc/js/core/Favicon.js' => '1fe2510c',
'rsrc/js/core/FileUpload.js' => '680ea2c8',
'rsrc/js/core/Hovercard.js' => '1bd28176',
'rsrc/js/core/KeyboardShortcut.js' => '1ae869f2',
'rsrc/js/core/KeyboardShortcutManager.js' => 'c19dd9b9',
'rsrc/js/core/MultirowRowManager.js' => 'b5d57730',
'rsrc/js/core/Notification.js' => '4f774dac',
'rsrc/js/core/Prefab.js' => '77b0ae28',
Provide a global router for Ajax requests Summary: Fixes T430. Fixes T4834. Obsoletes D7641. Currently, we do some things less-well than we could: - We just let the browser queue and prioritize requests, so if you load a revision with 50 changes and then click "Award Token", the action blocks until the changes load in most/all browsers. It would be better to prioritize this action and queue it immediately. - Similarly, changes tend to load in order, even if the user has clicked to a specific file. When the user expresses a preference for a specific file, we should prioritize it. - We show a spinning GIF when waiting on requests. This is appropriate for some types of reuqests, but distracting for others. To fix this: - Queue all (or, at least, most) requests into a new queue in JX.Router. - JX.Router handles prioritizing the requests. Principally: - You can submit a request with a specific priority (500 = general content loading, 1000 = default, 2000 = explicit user action) and JX.Router will get the higher stuff fired off sooner. - You can name requests and then adjust their prorities later, if the user expresses an interest in specific results. - Only use the spinner gif for "workflow" requests, which is bascially when the user clicked something and we're waiting on the server. I think it's useful and not-annoying in this case. - Don't show any status for draft requests. - For content requests, show a subtle hipster-style top loading bar. Test Plan: - Viewed a diff with 93 changes, and clicked award token. - Prior to this patch, the action took many many seconds to resolve. - After this patch, it resolves quickly. - Viewed a diff with 93 changes and saw a pleasant subtle hipster-style loading bar. - Viewed a diff with 93 changes and typed some draft text. Previews populated fairly quickly and there was no spinner. - Viewed a diff with 93 changes and clicked something with workflow, saw a spinner after a moment. - Viewed a diff with 93 changes and clicked a file in the table of contents near the end of the list. - Prior to this patch, it took a long time to show up. - After this patch, it loads directly. Reviewers: chad, btrahan Reviewed By: btrahan Subscribers: epriestley Maniphest Tasks: T430, T4834 Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D8979
2014-05-05 19:57:42 +02:00
'rsrc/js/core/ShapedRequest.js' => '7cbe244b',
'rsrc/js/core/TextAreaUtils.js' => '320810c8',
'rsrc/js/core/Title.js' => '485aaa6c',
'rsrc/js/core/ToolTip.js' => '358b8c04',
'rsrc/js/core/behavior-active-nav.js' => 'e379b58e',
'rsrc/js/core/behavior-audio-source.js' => '59b251eb',
'rsrc/js/core/behavior-autofocus.js' => '7319e029',
'rsrc/js/core/behavior-badge-view.js' => '8ff5e24c',
'rsrc/js/core/behavior-bulk-editor.js' => '66a6def1',
Allow installs to customize project icons Summary: Ref T10010. Ref T5819. General alignment of the stars: - There were some hacks in Conduit around stripping `fa-...` off icons when reading and writing that I wanted to get rid of. - We probably have room for a subtitle in the new heavy nav, and using the icon name is a good starting point (and maybe good enough on its own?) - The project list was real bad looking with redundant tag/names, now it is very slightly less bad looking with non-redundant types? - Some installs will want to call Milestones something else, and this gets us a big part of the way there. - This may slightly help to reinforce "tag" vs "policy" vs "group" stuff? --- I'm letting installs have enough rope to shoot themselves in the foot (e.g., define 100 icons). It isn't the end of the world if they reuse icons, and is clearly their fault. I think the cases where 100 icons will break down are: - Icon selector dialog may get very unwieldy. - Query UI will be pretty iffy/huge with 100 icons. We could improve these fairly easily if an install comes up with a reasonable use case for having 100 icons. --- The UI on the icon itself in the list views is a little iffy -- mostly, it's too saturated/bold. I'd ideally like to try either: - rendering a "shade" version (i.e. lighter, less-saturated color); or - rendering a "shade" tag with just the icon in it. However, there didn't seem to be a way to do the first one right now (`fa-example sh-blue` doesn't work) and the second one had weird margins/padding, so I left it like this for now. I figure we can clean it up once we build the thick nav, since that will probably also want an identical element. (I don't want to render a full tag with the icon + name since I think that's confusing -- it looks like a project/object tag, but is not.) Test Plan: {F1049905} {F1049906} Reviewers: chad Reviewed By: chad Subscribers: 20after4, Luke081515.2 Maniphest Tasks: T5819, T10010 Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D14918
2015-12-30 13:36:48 +01:00
'rsrc/js/core/behavior-choose-control.js' => '327a00d1',
'rsrc/js/core/behavior-copy.js' => 'b0b8f86d',
'rsrc/js/core/behavior-detect-timezone.js' => '4c193c96',
'rsrc/js/core/behavior-device.js' => 'a3714c76',
'rsrc/js/core/behavior-drag-and-drop-textarea.js' => '484a6e22',
'rsrc/js/core/behavior-fancy-datepicker.js' => 'ecf4e799',
'rsrc/js/core/behavior-file-tree.js' => '88236f00',
'rsrc/js/core/behavior-form.js' => '5c54cbf3',
'rsrc/js/core/behavior-gesture.js' => '3ab51e2c',
'rsrc/js/core/behavior-global-drag-and-drop.js' => '960f6a39',
'rsrc/js/core/behavior-high-security-warning.js' => 'a464fe03',
'rsrc/js/core/behavior-history-install.js' => '7ee2b591',
'rsrc/js/core/behavior-hovercard.js' => 'bcaccd64',
'rsrc/js/core/behavior-keyboard-pager.js' => 'a8da01f0',
'rsrc/js/core/behavior-keyboard-shortcuts.js' => '01fca1f0',
'rsrc/js/core/behavior-lightbox-attachments.js' => '6b31879a',
'rsrc/js/core/behavior-line-linker.js' => '66a62306',
Replace the "Choose Subtype" radio buttons dialog with a simpler "big stuff you click" sort of UI Summary: Ref T13222. Fixes T12588. See PHI683. In several cases, we present the user with a choice between multiple major options: Alamnac service types, Drydock blueprint types, Repository VCS types, Herald rule types, etc. Today, we generally do this with radio buttons and a "Submit" button. This isn't terrible, but often it means users have to click twice (once on the radio; once on submit) when a single click would be sufficient. The radio click target can also be small. In other cases, we have a container with a link and we'd like to link the entire container: notifications, the `/drydock/` console, etc. We'd like to just link the entire container, but this causes some problems: - It's not legal to link block eleements like `<a><div> ... </div></a>` and some browsers actually get upset about it. - We can `<a><span> ... </span></a>` instead, then turn the `<span>` into a block element with CSS -- and this sometimes works, but also has some drawbacks: - It's not great to do that for screenreaders, since the readable text in the link isn't necessarily very meaningful. - We can't have any other links inside the element (e.g., details or documentation). - We can `<form><button> ... </button></form>` instead, but this has its own set of problems: - You can't right-click to interact with a button in the same way you can with a link. - Also not great for screenreaders. Instead, try adding a `linked-container` behavior which just means "when users click this element, pretend they clicked the first link inside it". This gives us natural HTML (real, legal HTML with actual `<a>` tags) and good screenreader behavior, but allows the effective link target to be visually larger than just the link. If no issues crop up with this, I'd plan to eventually use this technique in more places (Repositories, Herald, Almanac, Drydock, Notifications menu, etc). Test Plan: {F6053035} - Left-clicked and command-left-clicked the new JS fanciness, got sensible behaviors. Reviewers: amckinley Reviewed By: amckinley Subscribers: PHID-OPKG-gm6ozazyms6q6i22gyam Maniphest Tasks: T13222, T12588 Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D19855
2018-12-07 15:04:07 +01:00
'rsrc/js/core/behavior-linked-container.js' => '291da458',
'rsrc/js/core/behavior-more.js' => 'a80d0378',
'rsrc/js/core/behavior-object-selector.js' => '77c1f0b0',
'rsrc/js/core/behavior-oncopy.js' => '2926fff2',
'rsrc/js/core/behavior-phabricator-nav.js' => '9d32bc88',
2017-04-26 17:49:53 +02:00
'rsrc/js/core/behavior-phabricator-remarkup-assist.js' => 'acd29eee',
'rsrc/js/core/behavior-read-only-warning.js' => 'ba158207',
'rsrc/js/core/behavior-redirect.js' => '0213259f',
When logged-out users hit a "Login Required" dialog, try to choose a better "next" URI Summary: Ref T10004. After a user logs in, we send them to the "next" URI cookie if there is one, but currently don't always do a very good job of selecting a "next" URI, especially if they tried to do something with a dialog before being asked to log in. In particular, if a logged-out user clicks an action like "Edit Blocking Tasks" on a Maniphest task, the default behavior is to send them to the standalone page for that dialog after they log in. This can be pretty confusing. See T2691 and D6416 for earlier efforts here. At that time, we added a mechanism to //manually// override the default behavior, and fixed the most common links. This worked, but I'd like to fix the //default// beahvior so we don't need to remember to `setObjectURI()` correctly all over the place. ApplicationEditor has also introduced new cases which are more difficult to get right. While we could get them right by using the override and being careful about things, this also motivates fixing the default behavior. Finally, we have better tools for fixing the default behavior now than we did in 2013. Instead of using manual overrides, have JS include an "X-Phabricator-Via" header in Ajax requests. This is basically like a referrer header, and will contain the page the user's browser is on. In essentially every case, this should be a very good place (and often the best place) to send them after login. For all pages currently using `setObjectURI()`, it should produce the same behavior by default. I'll remove the `setObjectURI()` mechanism in the next diff. Test Plan: Clicked various workflow actions while logged out, saw "next" get set to a reasonable value, was redirected to a sensible, non-confusing page after login (the page with whatever button I clicked on it). Reviewers: chad Reviewed By: chad Maniphest Tasks: T10004 Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D14804
2015-12-17 15:10:04 +01:00
'rsrc/js/core/behavior-refresh-csrf.js' => 'ab2f381b',
'rsrc/js/core/behavior-remarkup-load-image.js' => '040fce04',
'rsrc/js/core/behavior-remarkup-preview.js' => '4b700e9e',
'rsrc/js/core/behavior-reorder-applications.js' => '76b9fc3e',
'rsrc/js/core/behavior-reveal-content.js' => '60821bc7',
'rsrc/js/core/behavior-scrollbar.js' => '834a1173',
'rsrc/js/core/behavior-search-typeahead.js' => 'c3e917d9',
'rsrc/js/core/behavior-select-content.js' => 'bf5374ef',
'rsrc/js/core/behavior-select-on-click.js' => '4e3e79a6',
'rsrc/js/core/behavior-setup-check-https.js' => '491416b3',
'rsrc/js/core/behavior-time-typeahead.js' => '522431f7',
'rsrc/js/core/behavior-toggle-class.js' => '92b9ec77',
'rsrc/js/core/behavior-tokenizer.js' => 'b3a4b884',
'rsrc/js/core/behavior-tooltip.js' => 'c420b0b9',
'rsrc/js/core/behavior-user-menu.js' => '31420f77',
'rsrc/js/core/behavior-watch-anchor.js' => '9f36c42d',
Provide a global router for Ajax requests Summary: Fixes T430. Fixes T4834. Obsoletes D7641. Currently, we do some things less-well than we could: - We just let the browser queue and prioritize requests, so if you load a revision with 50 changes and then click "Award Token", the action blocks until the changes load in most/all browsers. It would be better to prioritize this action and queue it immediately. - Similarly, changes tend to load in order, even if the user has clicked to a specific file. When the user expresses a preference for a specific file, we should prioritize it. - We show a spinning GIF when waiting on requests. This is appropriate for some types of reuqests, but distracting for others. To fix this: - Queue all (or, at least, most) requests into a new queue in JX.Router. - JX.Router handles prioritizing the requests. Principally: - You can submit a request with a specific priority (500 = general content loading, 1000 = default, 2000 = explicit user action) and JX.Router will get the higher stuff fired off sooner. - You can name requests and then adjust their prorities later, if the user expresses an interest in specific results. - Only use the spinner gif for "workflow" requests, which is bascially when the user clicked something and we're waiting on the server. I think it's useful and not-annoying in this case. - Don't show any status for draft requests. - For content requests, show a subtle hipster-style top loading bar. Test Plan: - Viewed a diff with 93 changes, and clicked award token. - Prior to this patch, the action took many many seconds to resolve. - After this patch, it resolves quickly. - Viewed a diff with 93 changes and saw a pleasant subtle hipster-style loading bar. - Viewed a diff with 93 changes and typed some draft text. Previews populated fairly quickly and there was no spinner. - Viewed a diff with 93 changes and clicked something with workflow, saw a spinner after a moment. - Viewed a diff with 93 changes and clicked a file in the table of contents near the end of the list. - Prior to this patch, it took a long time to show up. - After this patch, it loads directly. Reviewers: chad, btrahan Reviewed By: btrahan Subscribers: epriestley Maniphest Tasks: T430, T4834 Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D8979
2014-05-05 19:57:42 +02:00
'rsrc/js/core/behavior-workflow.js' => '0a3f3021',
'rsrc/js/core/darkconsole/DarkLog.js' => 'c8e1ffe3',
'rsrc/js/core/darkconsole/DarkMessage.js' => 'c48cccdd',
'rsrc/js/core/darkconsole/behavior-dark-console.js' => '66888767',
'rsrc/js/core/phtize.js' => 'd254d646',
'rsrc/js/phui/behavior-phui-dropdown-menu.js' => 'b95d6f7d',
'rsrc/js/phui/behavior-phui-file-upload.js' => 'b003d4fb',
'rsrc/js/phui/behavior-phui-selectable-list.js' => '464259a2',
'rsrc/js/phui/behavior-phui-submenu.js' => 'a6f7a73b',
'rsrc/js/phui/behavior-phui-tab-group.js' => '0a0b10e9',
'rsrc/js/phuix/PHUIXActionListView.js' => 'b5c256b8',
'rsrc/js/phuix/PHUIXActionView.js' => '8d4a8c72',
'rsrc/js/phuix/PHUIXAutocomplete.js' => 'df1bbd34',
'rsrc/js/phuix/PHUIXButtonView.js' => '85ac9772',
'rsrc/js/phuix/PHUIXDropdownMenu.js' => '04b2ae03',
'rsrc/js/phuix/PHUIXExample.js' => '68af71ca',
'rsrc/js/phuix/PHUIXFormControl.js' => '210a16c1',
'rsrc/js/phuix/PHUIXIconView.js' => 'bff6884b',
),
'symbols' => array(
'almanac-css' => 'dbb9b3af',
'aphront-bars' => '231ac33c',
'aphront-dark-console-css' => '0e14e8f6',
'aphront-dialog-view-css' => '6bfc244b',
'aphront-list-filter-view-css' => '5d6f0526',
'aphront-multi-column-view-css' => '84cc6640',
'aphront-panel-view-css' => '8427b78d',
'aphront-table-view-css' => '8c9bbafe',
'aphront-tokenizer-control-css' => '15d5ff71',
'aphront-tooltip-css' => 'cb1397a4',
'aphront-typeahead-control-css' => 'a4a21016',
'application-search-view-css' => '787f5b76',
'auth-css' => '0877ed6e',
2015-06-23 22:43:47 +02:00
'bulk-job-css' => 'df9c1d4a',
'conduit-api-css' => '7bc725c4',
'config-options-css' => '4615667b',
'conpherence-color-css' => 'abb4c358',
'conpherence-durable-column-view' => '89ea6bef',
'conpherence-header-pane-css' => 'cb6f4e19',
'conpherence-menu-css' => '69368e97',
'conpherence-message-pane-css' => 'b0f55ecc',
'conpherence-notification-css' => 'cef0a3fc',
'conpherence-participant-pane-css' => '26a3ce56',
Fix several duplication/replay behaviors in Aphlict Summary: Ref T12566. Ref T12563. This fixes three bugs with Aphlict replay stuff: First, Conphernece would try to repaint the UI even if no thread was open. Only repaint when a thread is open. Second, although we deduplicate JX.Leader messages, we didn't deduplicate actual notification messages. If you browsed the leader window, then it re-elected itelf as a leader and replayed history, it could rebroadcast notifications and other windows could show doubles. Deduplicate notifications to prevent this. Third, we always replayed the last 60 seconds of history. When you browsed the leader window, whichever window became the new leader (possibly the one you just browsed) could replay messages from before it had opened, leading to duplicate messages. Particularly, after receiving a message and then browsing you could see that message again. Instead, only replay history as far back as when the window first opened. Test Plan: - Clicked "Repaint" with a thread open, saw a repaint. Clicked "Repaint" with Conpherence open but no thread, no repaint and no 404 request to `/update/null/`. - In browser A, opened three windows. In browser B, sent a notification. In browser A, browsed the leader window away twice in a row. Observed that the window which never became a leader doesn't duplicate notifications. - In browser A, opened three windows. In browser B, sent a notification. In browser A, browsed the leader window away over and over again. Observed that replay requests issued with appropriate history windows. Reviewers: chad Reviewed By: chad Maniphest Tasks: T12566, T12563 Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D17722
2017-04-18 20:14:37 +02:00
'conpherence-thread-manager' => '4d863052',
'conpherence-transaction-css' => '85129c68',
'd3' => 'a11a5ff2',
'differential-changeset-view-css' => 'db34a142',
'differential-core-view-css' => '5b7b8ff4',
'differential-revision-add-comment-css' => 'c47f8c40',
'differential-revision-comment-css' => '14b8565a',
2014-03-12 21:53:04 +01:00
'differential-revision-history-css' => '0e8eb855',
'differential-revision-list-css' => 'f3c47d33',
2015-06-23 22:43:47 +02:00
'differential-table-of-contents-css' => 'ae4b7a55',
'diffusion-css' => '45727264',
'diffusion-icons-css' => '0c15255e',
'diffusion-readme-css' => '419dd5b6',
'diffusion-repository-css' => 'ee6f20ec',
'diviner-shared-css' => '896f1d43',
'font-fontawesome' => 'e838e088',
'font-lato' => 'c7ccd872',
'global-drag-and-drop-css' => 'b556a948',
'harbormaster-css' => '7446ce72',
'herald-css' => 'cd8d0134',
'herald-rule-editor' => 'dca75c0e',
'herald-test-css' => 'a52e323e',
'inline-comment-summary-css' => 'f23d4e8f',
Fix several duplication/replay behaviors in Aphlict Summary: Ref T12566. Ref T12563. This fixes three bugs with Aphlict replay stuff: First, Conphernece would try to repaint the UI even if no thread was open. Only repaint when a thread is open. Second, although we deduplicate JX.Leader messages, we didn't deduplicate actual notification messages. If you browsed the leader window, then it re-elected itelf as a leader and replayed history, it could rebroadcast notifications and other windows could show doubles. Deduplicate notifications to prevent this. Third, we always replayed the last 60 seconds of history. When you browsed the leader window, whichever window became the new leader (possibly the one you just browsed) could replay messages from before it had opened, leading to duplicate messages. Particularly, after receiving a message and then browsing you could see that message again. Instead, only replay history as far back as when the window first opened. Test Plan: - Clicked "Repaint" with a thread open, saw a repaint. Clicked "Repaint" with Conpherence open but no thread, no repaint and no 404 request to `/update/null/`. - In browser A, opened three windows. In browser B, sent a notification. In browser A, browsed the leader window away twice in a row. Observed that the window which never became a leader doesn't duplicate notifications. - In browser A, opened three windows. In browser B, sent a notification. In browser A, browsed the leader window away over and over again. Observed that replay requests issued with appropriate history windows. Reviewers: chad Reviewed By: chad Maniphest Tasks: T12566, T12563 Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D17722
2017-04-18 20:14:37 +02:00
'javelin-aphlict' => 'e1d4b11a',
Introduce CAN_EDIT for ExternalAccount, and make CAN_VIEW more liberal Summary: Fixes T3732. Ref T1205. Ref T3116. External accounts (like emails used as identities, Facebook accounts, LDAP accounts, etc.) are stored in "ExternalAccount" objects. Currently, we have a very restrictive `CAN_VIEW` policy for ExternalAccounts, to add an extra layer of protection to make sure users can't use them in unintended ways. For example, it would be bad if a user could link their Phabricator account to a Facebook account without proper authentication. All of the controllers which do sensitive things have checks anyway, but a restrictive CAN_VIEW provided an extra layer of protection. Se T3116 for some discussion. However, this means that when grey/external users take actions (via email, or via applications like Legalpad) other users can't load the account handles and can't see anything about the actor (they just see "Restricted External Account" or similar). Balancing these concerns is mostly about not making a huge mess while doing it. This seems like a reasonable approach: - Add `CAN_EDIT` on these objects. - Make that very restricted, but open up `CAN_VIEW`. - Require `CAN_EDIT` any time we're going to do something authentication/identity related. This is slightly easier to get wrong (forget CAN_EDIT) than other approaches, but pretty simple, and we always have extra checks in place anyway -- this is just a safety net. I'm not quite sure how we should identify external accounts, so for now we're just rendering "Email User" or similar -- clearly not a bug, but not identifying. We can figure out what to render in the long term elsewhere. Test Plan: - Viewed external accounts. - Linked an external account. - Refreshed an external account. - Edited profile picture. - Viewed sessions panel. - Published a bunch of stuff to Asana/JIRA. - Legalpad signature page now shows external accounts. {F171595} Reviewers: chad, btrahan Reviewed By: btrahan Subscribers: epriestley Maniphest Tasks: T3732, T1205, T3116 Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D9767
2014-07-10 19:18:10 +02:00
'javelin-behavior' => '61cbc29a',
'javelin-behavior-aphlict-dropdown' => 'caade6f2',
'javelin-behavior-aphlict-listen' => '599a8f5f',
'javelin-behavior-aphlict-status' => '5e2634b9',
'javelin-behavior-aphront-basic-tokenizer' => 'b3a4b884',
'javelin-behavior-aphront-drag-and-drop-textarea' => '484a6e22',
'javelin-behavior-aphront-form-disable-on-submit' => '5c54cbf3',
'javelin-behavior-aphront-more' => 'a80d0378',
'javelin-behavior-audio-source' => '59b251eb',
'javelin-behavior-audit-preview' => 'd835b03a',
'javelin-behavior-badge-view' => '8ff5e24c',
'javelin-behavior-bulk-editor' => '66a6def1',
2015-06-23 22:43:47 +02:00
'javelin-behavior-bulk-job-reload' => 'edf8a145',
'javelin-behavior-calendar-month-view' => 'fe33e256',
Allow installs to customize project icons Summary: Ref T10010. Ref T5819. General alignment of the stars: - There were some hacks in Conduit around stripping `fa-...` off icons when reading and writing that I wanted to get rid of. - We probably have room for a subtitle in the new heavy nav, and using the icon name is a good starting point (and maybe good enough on its own?) - The project list was real bad looking with redundant tag/names, now it is very slightly less bad looking with non-redundant types? - Some installs will want to call Milestones something else, and this gets us a big part of the way there. - This may slightly help to reinforce "tag" vs "policy" vs "group" stuff? --- I'm letting installs have enough rope to shoot themselves in the foot (e.g., define 100 icons). It isn't the end of the world if they reuse icons, and is clearly their fault. I think the cases where 100 icons will break down are: - Icon selector dialog may get very unwieldy. - Query UI will be pretty iffy/huge with 100 icons. We could improve these fairly easily if an install comes up with a reasonable use case for having 100 icons. --- The UI on the icon itself in the list views is a little iffy -- mostly, it's too saturated/bold. I'd ideally like to try either: - rendering a "shade" version (i.e. lighter, less-saturated color); or - rendering a "shade" tag with just the icon in it. However, there didn't seem to be a way to do the first one right now (`fa-example sh-blue` doesn't work) and the second one had weird margins/padding, so I left it like this for now. I figure we can clean it up once we build the thick nav, since that will probably also want an identical element. (I don't want to render a full tag with the icon + name since I think that's confusing -- it looks like a project/object tag, but is not.) Test Plan: {F1049905} {F1049906} Reviewers: chad Reviewed By: chad Subscribers: 20after4, Luke081515.2 Maniphest Tasks: T5819, T10010 Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D14918
2015-12-30 13:36:48 +01:00
'javelin-behavior-choose-control' => '327a00d1',
Pass timeline view data to comment previews, restoring Differential comment previews Summary: Ref T13222. In D19918, I refactored how timelines get "view data". Today, this is always additional data about which images/changesets/diffs are visible on the current revision/commit/mock, so we can tell if inline comments should be linked to a `#anchor` on the same page (if the inline is rendered there somewhere) or to a `/D123?id=1&vs=2` full link on a different page (if it isn't), but in general this could be any sort of state information about the current page that affects how the timeline should render. Previously, comment previews did not use any specialized object code and always rendered a "generic" timeline story. This was actually a bug, but none of the code we have today cares about this (since it's all inline related, and inlines render separately) so it never impacted anything. After the `TimelineEngine` change, the preview renders with Differential-specific code. This is more correct, but we were not passing the preview the "view data" so it broke. This preview doesn't actually need the view data and we could just make it bail out if it isn't present, but pass it through for consistency and so this works like we'd expect if we do something fancier with view data in the future. Test Plan: Viewed comment and inline comment previews in Differential, saw old behavior restored. Reviewers: amckinley Reviewed By: amckinley Maniphest Tasks: T13222 Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D19943
2019-01-03 01:48:53 +01:00
'javelin-behavior-comment-actions' => 'd848ec84',
'javelin-behavior-config-reorder-fields' => 'b6993408',
'javelin-behavior-conpherence-menu' => '4047cd35',
'javelin-behavior-conpherence-participant-pane' => 'd057e45a',
'javelin-behavior-conpherence-pontificate' => '55616e04',
'javelin-behavior-conpherence-search' => '9bbf3762',
'javelin-behavior-countdown-timer' => 'e4cc26b3',
'javelin-behavior-dark-console' => '66888767',
'javelin-behavior-dashboard-async-panel' => '469c0d9e',
'javelin-behavior-dashboard-move-panels' => '408bf173',
'javelin-behavior-dashboard-query-panel-select' => '453c5375',
'javelin-behavior-dashboard-tab-panel' => 'd4eecc63',
'javelin-behavior-day-view' => '4b3c4443',
'javelin-behavior-desktop-notifications-control' => '27ca6289',
'javelin-behavior-detect-timezone' => '4c193c96',
'javelin-behavior-device' => 'a3714c76',
'javelin-behavior-diff-preview-link' => '051c7832',
'javelin-behavior-differential-diff-radios' => 'e1ff79b1',
'javelin-behavior-differential-populate' => 'f0eb6708',
'javelin-behavior-differential-user-select' => 'a8d8459d',
'javelin-behavior-diffusion-commit-branches' => 'bdaf4d04',
'javelin-behavior-diffusion-commit-graph' => '75b83cbb',
'javelin-behavior-diffusion-locate-file' => '6d3e1947',
'javelin-behavior-diffusion-pull-lastmodified' => 'f01586dc',
'javelin-behavior-document-engine' => '3935d8c4',
'javelin-behavior-doorkeeper-tag' => '1db13e70',
'javelin-behavior-drydock-live-operation-status' => '901935ef',
'javelin-behavior-durable-column' => '2ae077e1',
'javelin-behavior-editengine-reorder-configs' => 'd7a74243',
'javelin-behavior-editengine-reorder-fields' => 'b59e1e96',
'javelin-behavior-event-all-day' => 'b41537c9',
'javelin-behavior-fancy-datepicker' => 'ecf4e799',
'javelin-behavior-global-drag-and-drop' => '960f6a39',
'javelin-behavior-harbormaster-log' => '549459b8',
'javelin-behavior-herald-rule-editor' => '7ebaeed3',
'javelin-behavior-high-security-warning' => 'a464fe03',
'javelin-behavior-history-install' => '7ee2b591',
'javelin-behavior-icon-composer' => '8499b6ab',
'javelin-behavior-launch-icon-composer' => '48086888',
'javelin-behavior-lightbox-attachments' => '6b31879a',
'javelin-behavior-line-chart' => 'e4232876',
Replace the "Choose Subtype" radio buttons dialog with a simpler "big stuff you click" sort of UI Summary: Ref T13222. Fixes T12588. See PHI683. In several cases, we present the user with a choice between multiple major options: Alamnac service types, Drydock blueprint types, Repository VCS types, Herald rule types, etc. Today, we generally do this with radio buttons and a "Submit" button. This isn't terrible, but often it means users have to click twice (once on the radio; once on submit) when a single click would be sufficient. The radio click target can also be small. In other cases, we have a container with a link and we'd like to link the entire container: notifications, the `/drydock/` console, etc. We'd like to just link the entire container, but this causes some problems: - It's not legal to link block eleements like `<a><div> ... </div></a>` and some browsers actually get upset about it. - We can `<a><span> ... </span></a>` instead, then turn the `<span>` into a block element with CSS -- and this sometimes works, but also has some drawbacks: - It's not great to do that for screenreaders, since the readable text in the link isn't necessarily very meaningful. - We can't have any other links inside the element (e.g., details or documentation). - We can `<form><button> ... </button></form>` instead, but this has its own set of problems: - You can't right-click to interact with a button in the same way you can with a link. - Also not great for screenreaders. Instead, try adding a `linked-container` behavior which just means "when users click this element, pretend they clicked the first link inside it". This gives us natural HTML (real, legal HTML with actual `<a>` tags) and good screenreader behavior, but allows the effective link target to be visually larger than just the link. If no issues crop up with this, I'd plan to eventually use this technique in more places (Repositories, Herald, Almanac, Drydock, Notifications menu, etc). Test Plan: {F6053035} - Left-clicked and command-left-clicked the new JS fanciness, got sensible behaviors. Reviewers: amckinley Reviewed By: amckinley Subscribers: PHID-OPKG-gm6ozazyms6q6i22gyam Maniphest Tasks: T13222, T12588 Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D19855
2018-12-07 15:04:07 +01:00
'javelin-behavior-linked-container' => '291da458',
'javelin-behavior-maniphest-batch-selector' => 'ad54037e',
'javelin-behavior-maniphest-list-editor' => 'a9f88de2',
'javelin-behavior-maniphest-subpriority-editor' => '71237763',
'javelin-behavior-owners-path-editor' => '7a68dda3',
'javelin-behavior-passphrase-credential-control' => '3cb0b2fc',
'javelin-behavior-phabricator-active-nav' => 'e379b58e',
'javelin-behavior-phabricator-autofocus' => '7319e029',
'javelin-behavior-phabricator-clipboard-copy' => 'b0b8f86d',
'javelin-behavior-phabricator-file-tree' => '88236f00',
'javelin-behavior-phabricator-gesture' => '3ab51e2c',
'javelin-behavior-phabricator-gesture-example' => '558829c2',
'javelin-behavior-phabricator-keyboard-pager' => 'a8da01f0',
'javelin-behavior-phabricator-keyboard-shortcuts' => '01fca1f0',
'javelin-behavior-phabricator-line-linker' => '66a62306',
'javelin-behavior-phabricator-nav' => '9d32bc88',
'javelin-behavior-phabricator-notification-example' => '8ce821c5',
'javelin-behavior-phabricator-object-selector' => '77c1f0b0',
'javelin-behavior-phabricator-oncopy' => '2926fff2',
2017-04-26 17:49:53 +02:00
'javelin-behavior-phabricator-remarkup-assist' => 'acd29eee',
'javelin-behavior-phabricator-reveal-content' => '60821bc7',
'javelin-behavior-phabricator-search-typeahead' => 'c3e917d9',
Remove "willRenderTimeline()" from ApplicationTransactionInterface Summary: Depends on D19914. Ref T11351. Some of the Phoilo rabbit holes go very deep. `PhabricatorApplicationTransactionInterface` currently requires you to implement `willRenderTimeline()`. Almost every object just implements this as `return $timeline`; only Pholio, Diffusion, and Differential specialize it. In all cases, they are specializing it mostly to render inline comments. The actual implementations are a bit of a weird mess and the way the data is threaded through the call stack is weird and not very modern. Try to clean this up: - Stop requiring `willRenderTimeline()` to be implemented. - Stop requiring `getApplicationTransactionViewObject()` to be implemented (only the three above, plus Legalpad, implement this, and Legalpad's implementation is a no-op). These two methods are inherently pretty coupled for almost any reasonable thing you might want to do with the timeline. - Simplify the handling of "renderdata" and call it "View Data". This is additional information about the current view of the transaction timeline that is required to render it correctly. This is only used in Differential, to decide if we can link an inline comment to an anchor on the same page or should link it to another page. We could perhaps do this on the client instead, but having this data doesn't seem inherently bad to me. - If objects want to customize timeline rendering, they now implement `PhabricatorTimelineInterface` and provide a `TimelineEngine` which gets a nice formal stack. This leaves a lot of empty `willRenderTimeline()` implementations hanging around. I'll remove these in the next change, it's just going to be deleting a couple dozen copies of an identical empty method implementation. Test Plan: - Viewed audits, revisions, and mocks with inline comments. - Used "Show Older" to page a revision back in history (this is relevant for "View Data"). - Grepped for symbols: willRenderTimeline, getApplicationTransactionViewObject, Legalpad classes. Reviewers: amckinley Reviewed By: amckinley Maniphest Tasks: T11351 Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D19918
2018-12-19 20:52:53 +01:00
'javelin-behavior-phabricator-show-older-transactions' => '0e1eca96',
'javelin-behavior-phabricator-tooltips' => 'c420b0b9',
'javelin-behavior-phabricator-transaction-comment-form' => 'b23b49e6',
'javelin-behavior-phabricator-transaction-list' => '1f6794f6',
'javelin-behavior-phabricator-watch-anchor' => '9f36c42d',
'javelin-behavior-pholio-mock-edit' => 'bee502c8',
'javelin-behavior-pholio-mock-view' => 'ec1f3669',
'javelin-behavior-phui-dropdown-menu' => 'b95d6f7d',
'javelin-behavior-phui-file-upload' => 'b003d4fb',
'javelin-behavior-phui-hovercards' => 'bcaccd64',
'javelin-behavior-phui-selectable-list' => '464259a2',
'javelin-behavior-phui-submenu' => 'a6f7a73b',
'javelin-behavior-phui-tab-group' => '0a0b10e9',
'javelin-behavior-phuix-example' => '68af71ca',
'javelin-behavior-policy-control' => 'd0c516d5',
'javelin-behavior-policy-rule-editor' => '5e9f347c',
'javelin-behavior-project-boards' => '4250a34e',
'javelin-behavior-project-create' => '065227cc',
'javelin-behavior-quicksand-blacklist' => '7927a7d3',
'javelin-behavior-read-only-warning' => 'ba158207',
'javelin-behavior-redirect' => '0213259f',
When logged-out users hit a "Login Required" dialog, try to choose a better "next" URI Summary: Ref T10004. After a user logs in, we send them to the "next" URI cookie if there is one, but currently don't always do a very good job of selecting a "next" URI, especially if they tried to do something with a dialog before being asked to log in. In particular, if a logged-out user clicks an action like "Edit Blocking Tasks" on a Maniphest task, the default behavior is to send them to the standalone page for that dialog after they log in. This can be pretty confusing. See T2691 and D6416 for earlier efforts here. At that time, we added a mechanism to //manually// override the default behavior, and fixed the most common links. This worked, but I'd like to fix the //default// beahvior so we don't need to remember to `setObjectURI()` correctly all over the place. ApplicationEditor has also introduced new cases which are more difficult to get right. While we could get them right by using the override and being careful about things, this also motivates fixing the default behavior. Finally, we have better tools for fixing the default behavior now than we did in 2013. Instead of using manual overrides, have JS include an "X-Phabricator-Via" header in Ajax requests. This is basically like a referrer header, and will contain the page the user's browser is on. In essentially every case, this should be a very good place (and often the best place) to send them after login. For all pages currently using `setObjectURI()`, it should produce the same behavior by default. I'll remove the `setObjectURI()` mechanism in the next diff. Test Plan: Clicked various workflow actions while logged out, saw "next" get set to a reasonable value, was redirected to a sensible, non-confusing page after login (the page with whatever button I clicked on it). Reviewers: chad Reviewed By: chad Maniphest Tasks: T10004 Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D14804
2015-12-17 15:10:04 +01:00
'javelin-behavior-refresh-csrf' => 'ab2f381b',
'javelin-behavior-releeph-preview-branch' => 'b2b4fbaf',
'javelin-behavior-releeph-request-state-change' => 'a0b57eb8',
Introduce CAN_EDIT for ExternalAccount, and make CAN_VIEW more liberal Summary: Fixes T3732. Ref T1205. Ref T3116. External accounts (like emails used as identities, Facebook accounts, LDAP accounts, etc.) are stored in "ExternalAccount" objects. Currently, we have a very restrictive `CAN_VIEW` policy for ExternalAccounts, to add an extra layer of protection to make sure users can't use them in unintended ways. For example, it would be bad if a user could link their Phabricator account to a Facebook account without proper authentication. All of the controllers which do sensitive things have checks anyway, but a restrictive CAN_VIEW provided an extra layer of protection. Se T3116 for some discussion. However, this means that when grey/external users take actions (via email, or via applications like Legalpad) other users can't load the account handles and can't see anything about the actor (they just see "Restricted External Account" or similar). Balancing these concerns is mostly about not making a huge mess while doing it. This seems like a reasonable approach: - Add `CAN_EDIT` on these objects. - Make that very restricted, but open up `CAN_VIEW`. - Require `CAN_EDIT` any time we're going to do something authentication/identity related. This is slightly easier to get wrong (forget CAN_EDIT) than other approaches, but pretty simple, and we always have extra checks in place anyway -- this is just a safety net. I'm not quite sure how we should identify external accounts, so for now we're just rendering "Email User" or similar -- clearly not a bug, but not identifying. We can figure out what to render in the long term elsewhere. Test Plan: - Viewed external accounts. - Linked an external account. - Refreshed an external account. - Edited profile picture. - Viewed sessions panel. - Published a bunch of stuff to Asana/JIRA. - Legalpad signature page now shows external accounts. {F171595} Reviewers: chad, btrahan Reviewed By: btrahan Subscribers: epriestley Maniphest Tasks: T3732, T1205, T3116 Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D9767
2014-07-10 19:18:10 +02:00
'javelin-behavior-releeph-request-typeahead' => 'de2e896f',
'javelin-behavior-remarkup-load-image' => '040fce04',
'javelin-behavior-remarkup-preview' => '4b700e9e',
'javelin-behavior-reorder-applications' => '76b9fc3e',
'javelin-behavior-reorder-columns' => 'e1d25dfb',
'javelin-behavior-reorder-profile-menu-items' => 'e2e0a072',
'javelin-behavior-repository-crossreference' => '9a860428',
'javelin-behavior-scrollbar' => '834a1173',
'javelin-behavior-search-reorder-queries' => 'e9581f08',
'javelin-behavior-select-content' => 'bf5374ef',
'javelin-behavior-select-on-click' => '4e3e79a6',
'javelin-behavior-setup-check-https' => '491416b3',
'javelin-behavior-stripe-payment-form' => 'a6b98425',
'javelin-behavior-test-payment-form' => 'fc91ab6c',
'javelin-behavior-time-typeahead' => '522431f7',
'javelin-behavior-toggle-class' => '92b9ec77',
'javelin-behavior-toggle-widget' => '3dbf94d5',
'javelin-behavior-typeahead-browse' => '635de1ec',
'javelin-behavior-typeahead-search' => '93d0c9e3',
'javelin-behavior-user-menu' => '31420f77',
'javelin-behavior-view-placeholder' => '47830651',
Provide a global router for Ajax requests Summary: Fixes T430. Fixes T4834. Obsoletes D7641. Currently, we do some things less-well than we could: - We just let the browser queue and prioritize requests, so if you load a revision with 50 changes and then click "Award Token", the action blocks until the changes load in most/all browsers. It would be better to prioritize this action and queue it immediately. - Similarly, changes tend to load in order, even if the user has clicked to a specific file. When the user expresses a preference for a specific file, we should prioritize it. - We show a spinning GIF when waiting on requests. This is appropriate for some types of reuqests, but distracting for others. To fix this: - Queue all (or, at least, most) requests into a new queue in JX.Router. - JX.Router handles prioritizing the requests. Principally: - You can submit a request with a specific priority (500 = general content loading, 1000 = default, 2000 = explicit user action) and JX.Router will get the higher stuff fired off sooner. - You can name requests and then adjust their prorities later, if the user expresses an interest in specific results. - Only use the spinner gif for "workflow" requests, which is bascially when the user clicked something and we're waiting on the server. I think it's useful and not-annoying in this case. - Don't show any status for draft requests. - For content requests, show a subtle hipster-style top loading bar. Test Plan: - Viewed a diff with 93 changes, and clicked award token. - Prior to this patch, the action took many many seconds to resolve. - After this patch, it resolves quickly. - Viewed a diff with 93 changes and saw a pleasant subtle hipster-style loading bar. - Viewed a diff with 93 changes and typed some draft text. Previews populated fairly quickly and there was no spinner. - Viewed a diff with 93 changes and clicked something with workflow, saw a spinner after a moment. - Viewed a diff with 93 changes and clicked a file in the table of contents near the end of the list. - Prior to this patch, it took a long time to show up. - After this patch, it loads directly. Reviewers: chad, btrahan Reviewed By: btrahan Subscribers: epriestley Maniphest Tasks: T430, T4834 Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D8979
2014-05-05 19:57:42 +02:00
'javelin-behavior-workflow' => '0a3f3021',
'javelin-color' => '7e41274a',
'javelin-cookie' => '62dfea03',
'javelin-diffusion-locate-file-source' => '00676f00',
'javelin-dom' => '4976858c',
'javelin-dynval' => 'f6555212',
'javelin-event' => 'ef7e057f',
'javelin-fx' => '54b612ba',
'javelin-history' => 'd4505101',
'javelin-install' => '05270951',
Introduce CAN_EDIT for ExternalAccount, and make CAN_VIEW more liberal Summary: Fixes T3732. Ref T1205. Ref T3116. External accounts (like emails used as identities, Facebook accounts, LDAP accounts, etc.) are stored in "ExternalAccount" objects. Currently, we have a very restrictive `CAN_VIEW` policy for ExternalAccounts, to add an extra layer of protection to make sure users can't use them in unintended ways. For example, it would be bad if a user could link their Phabricator account to a Facebook account without proper authentication. All of the controllers which do sensitive things have checks anyway, but a restrictive CAN_VIEW provided an extra layer of protection. Se T3116 for some discussion. However, this means that when grey/external users take actions (via email, or via applications like Legalpad) other users can't load the account handles and can't see anything about the actor (they just see "Restricted External Account" or similar). Balancing these concerns is mostly about not making a huge mess while doing it. This seems like a reasonable approach: - Add `CAN_EDIT` on these objects. - Make that very restricted, but open up `CAN_VIEW`. - Require `CAN_EDIT` any time we're going to do something authentication/identity related. This is slightly easier to get wrong (forget CAN_EDIT) than other approaches, but pretty simple, and we always have extra checks in place anyway -- this is just a safety net. I'm not quite sure how we should identify external accounts, so for now we're just rendering "Email User" or similar -- clearly not a bug, but not identifying. We can figure out what to render in the long term elsewhere. Test Plan: - Viewed external accounts. - Linked an external account. - Refreshed an external account. - Edited profile picture. - Viewed sessions panel. - Published a bunch of stuff to Asana/JIRA. - Legalpad signature page now shows external accounts. {F171595} Reviewers: chad, btrahan Reviewed By: btrahan Subscribers: epriestley Maniphest Tasks: T3732, T1205, T3116 Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D9767
2014-07-10 19:18:10 +02:00
'javelin-json' => '69adf288',
'javelin-leader' => '7f243deb',
'javelin-magical-init' => '8d83d2a1',
Introduce CAN_EDIT for ExternalAccount, and make CAN_VIEW more liberal Summary: Fixes T3732. Ref T1205. Ref T3116. External accounts (like emails used as identities, Facebook accounts, LDAP accounts, etc.) are stored in "ExternalAccount" objects. Currently, we have a very restrictive `CAN_VIEW` policy for ExternalAccounts, to add an extra layer of protection to make sure users can't use them in unintended ways. For example, it would be bad if a user could link their Phabricator account to a Facebook account without proper authentication. All of the controllers which do sensitive things have checks anyway, but a restrictive CAN_VIEW provided an extra layer of protection. Se T3116 for some discussion. However, this means that when grey/external users take actions (via email, or via applications like Legalpad) other users can't load the account handles and can't see anything about the actor (they just see "Restricted External Account" or similar). Balancing these concerns is mostly about not making a huge mess while doing it. This seems like a reasonable approach: - Add `CAN_EDIT` on these objects. - Make that very restricted, but open up `CAN_VIEW`. - Require `CAN_EDIT` any time we're going to do something authentication/identity related. This is slightly easier to get wrong (forget CAN_EDIT) than other approaches, but pretty simple, and we always have extra checks in place anyway -- this is just a safety net. I'm not quite sure how we should identify external accounts, so for now we're just rendering "Email User" or similar -- clearly not a bug, but not identifying. We can figure out what to render in the long term elsewhere. Test Plan: - Viewed external accounts. - Linked an external account. - Refreshed an external account. - Edited profile picture. - Viewed sessions panel. - Published a bunch of stuff to Asana/JIRA. - Legalpad signature page now shows external accounts. {F171595} Reviewers: chad, btrahan Reviewed By: btrahan Subscribers: epriestley Maniphest Tasks: T3732, T1205, T3116 Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D9767
2014-07-10 19:18:10 +02:00
'javelin-mask' => '8a41885b',
When logged-out users hit a "Login Required" dialog, try to choose a better "next" URI Summary: Ref T10004. After a user logs in, we send them to the "next" URI cookie if there is one, but currently don't always do a very good job of selecting a "next" URI, especially if they tried to do something with a dialog before being asked to log in. In particular, if a logged-out user clicks an action like "Edit Blocking Tasks" on a Maniphest task, the default behavior is to send them to the standalone page for that dialog after they log in. This can be pretty confusing. See T2691 and D6416 for earlier efforts here. At that time, we added a mechanism to //manually// override the default behavior, and fixed the most common links. This worked, but I'd like to fix the //default// beahvior so we don't need to remember to `setObjectURI()` correctly all over the place. ApplicationEditor has also introduced new cases which are more difficult to get right. While we could get them right by using the override and being careful about things, this also motivates fixing the default behavior. Finally, we have better tools for fixing the default behavior now than we did in 2013. Instead of using manual overrides, have JS include an "X-Phabricator-Via" header in Ajax requests. This is basically like a referrer header, and will contain the page the user's browser is on. In essentially every case, this should be a very good place (and often the best place) to send them after login. For all pages currently using `setObjectURI()`, it should produce the same behavior by default. I'll remove the `setObjectURI()` mechanism in the next diff. Test Plan: Clicked various workflow actions while logged out, saw "next" get set to a reasonable value, was redirected to a sensible, non-confusing page after login (the page with whatever button I clicked on it). Reviewers: chad Reviewed By: chad Maniphest Tasks: T10004 Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D14804
2015-12-17 15:10:04 +01:00
'javelin-quicksand' => '6b8ef10b',
'javelin-reactor' => '2b8de964',
'javelin-reactor-dom' => 'c90a04fc',
'javelin-reactor-node-calmer' => '76f4ebed',
'javelin-reactornode' => '1ad0a787',
'javelin-request' => '94b750d2',
'javelin-resource' => '44959b73',
Provide a global router for Ajax requests Summary: Fixes T430. Fixes T4834. Obsoletes D7641. Currently, we do some things less-well than we could: - We just let the browser queue and prioritize requests, so if you load a revision with 50 changes and then click "Award Token", the action blocks until the changes load in most/all browsers. It would be better to prioritize this action and queue it immediately. - Similarly, changes tend to load in order, even if the user has clicked to a specific file. When the user expresses a preference for a specific file, we should prioritize it. - We show a spinning GIF when waiting on requests. This is appropriate for some types of reuqests, but distracting for others. To fix this: - Queue all (or, at least, most) requests into a new queue in JX.Router. - JX.Router handles prioritizing the requests. Principally: - You can submit a request with a specific priority (500 = general content loading, 1000 = default, 2000 = explicit user action) and JX.Router will get the higher stuff fired off sooner. - You can name requests and then adjust their prorities later, if the user expresses an interest in specific results. - Only use the spinner gif for "workflow" requests, which is bascially when the user clicked something and we're waiting on the server. I think it's useful and not-annoying in this case. - Don't show any status for draft requests. - For content requests, show a subtle hipster-style top loading bar. Test Plan: - Viewed a diff with 93 changes, and clicked award token. - Prior to this patch, the action took many many seconds to resolve. - After this patch, it resolves quickly. - Viewed a diff with 93 changes and saw a pleasant subtle hipster-style loading bar. - Viewed a diff with 93 changes and typed some draft text. Previews populated fairly quickly and there was no spinner. - Viewed a diff with 93 changes and clicked something with workflow, saw a spinner after a moment. - Viewed a diff with 93 changes and clicked a file in the table of contents near the end of the list. - Prior to this patch, it took a long time to show up. - After this patch, it loads directly. Reviewers: chad, btrahan Reviewed By: btrahan Subscribers: epriestley Maniphest Tasks: T430, T4834 Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D8979
2014-05-05 19:57:42 +02:00
'javelin-routable' => 'b3e7d692',
'javelin-router' => '29274e2b',
'javelin-scrollbar' => '9065f639',
'javelin-sound' => '949c0fe5',
Emit a "Content-Security-Policy" HTTP header Summary: See PHI399. Ref T4340. This header provides an additional layer of protection against various attacks, including XSS attacks which embed inline `<script ...>` or `onhover="..."` content into the document. **style-src**: The "unsafe-inline" directive affects both `style="..."` and `<style>`. We use a lot of `style="..."`, some very legitimately, so we can't realistically get away from this any time soon. We only use one `<style>` (for monospaced font preferences) but can't disable `<style>` without disabling `style="..."`. **img-src**: We use "data:" URIs to inline small images into CSS, and there's a significant performance benefit from doing this. There doesn't seem to be a way to allow "data" URIs in CSS without allowing them in the document itself. **script-src** and **frame-src**: For a small number of flows (Recaptcha, Stripe) we embed external javascript, some of which embeds child elements (or additional resources) into the document. We now whitelist these narrowly on the respective pages. This won't work with Quicksand, so I've blacklisted it for now. **connect-src**: We need to include `'self'` for AJAX to work, and any websocket URIs. **Clickjacking**: We now have three layers of protection: - X-Frame-Options: works in older browsers. - `frame-ancestors 'none'`: does the same thing. - Explicit framebust in JX.Stratcom after initialization: works in ancient IE. We could probably drop the explicit framebust but it wasn't difficult to retain. **script tags**: We previously used an inline `<script>` tag to start Javelin. I've moved this to `<data data-javelin-init ...>` tags, which seems to work properly. **`__DEV__`**: We previously used an inline `<script>` tag to set the `__DEV__` mode flag. I tried using the "initialization" tags for this, but they fire too late. I moved it to `<html data-developer-mode="1">`, which seems OK everywhere. **CSP Scope**: Only the CSP header on the original request appears to matter -- you can't refine the scope by emitting headers on CSS/JS. To reduce confusion, I disabled the headers on those response types. More headers could be disabled, although we're likely already deep in the land of diminishing returns. **Initialization**: The initialization sequence has changed slightly. Previously, we waited for the <script> in bottom of the document to evaluate. Now, we go fishing for tags when domcontentready fires. Test Plan: - Browsed around in Firefox, Safari and Chrome looking for console warnings. Interacted with various Javascript behaviors. Enabled Quicksand. - Disabled all the framebusting, launched a clickjacking attack, verified that each layer of protection is individually effective. - Verified that the XHProf iframe in Darkconsole and the PHPAST frame layout work properly. - Enabled notifications, verified no complaints about connecting to Aphlict. - Hit `__DEV__` mode warnings based on the new data attribute. - Tried to do sketchy stuff with `data:` URIs and SVGs. This works but doesn't seem to be able to do anything dangerous. - Went through the Stripe and Recaptcha workflows. - Dumped and examined the CSP headers with `curl`, etc. - Added a raw <script> tag to a page (as though I'd found an XSS attack), verified it was no longer executed. Maniphest Tasks: T4340 Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D19143
2018-02-27 15:56:15 +01:00
'javelin-stratcom' => '327f418a',
'javelin-tokenizer' => 'bb6e5c16',
'javelin-typeahead' => '70baed2f',
Introduce CAN_EDIT for ExternalAccount, and make CAN_VIEW more liberal Summary: Fixes T3732. Ref T1205. Ref T3116. External accounts (like emails used as identities, Facebook accounts, LDAP accounts, etc.) are stored in "ExternalAccount" objects. Currently, we have a very restrictive `CAN_VIEW` policy for ExternalAccounts, to add an extra layer of protection to make sure users can't use them in unintended ways. For example, it would be bad if a user could link their Phabricator account to a Facebook account without proper authentication. All of the controllers which do sensitive things have checks anyway, but a restrictive CAN_VIEW provided an extra layer of protection. Se T3116 for some discussion. However, this means that when grey/external users take actions (via email, or via applications like Legalpad) other users can't load the account handles and can't see anything about the actor (they just see "Restricted External Account" or similar). Balancing these concerns is mostly about not making a huge mess while doing it. This seems like a reasonable approach: - Add `CAN_EDIT` on these objects. - Make that very restricted, but open up `CAN_VIEW`. - Require `CAN_EDIT` any time we're going to do something authentication/identity related. This is slightly easier to get wrong (forget CAN_EDIT) than other approaches, but pretty simple, and we always have extra checks in place anyway -- this is just a safety net. I'm not quite sure how we should identify external accounts, so for now we're just rendering "Email User" or similar -- clearly not a bug, but not identifying. We can figure out what to render in the long term elsewhere. Test Plan: - Viewed external accounts. - Linked an external account. - Refreshed an external account. - Edited profile picture. - Viewed sessions panel. - Published a bunch of stuff to Asana/JIRA. - Legalpad signature page now shows external accounts. {F171595} Reviewers: chad, btrahan Reviewed By: btrahan Subscribers: epriestley Maniphest Tasks: T3732, T1205, T3116 Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D9767
2014-07-10 19:18:10 +02:00
'javelin-typeahead-composite-source' => '503e17fd',
'javelin-typeahead-normalizer' => '185bbd53',
'javelin-typeahead-ondemand-source' => '013ffff9',
Introduce CAN_EDIT for ExternalAccount, and make CAN_VIEW more liberal Summary: Fixes T3732. Ref T1205. Ref T3116. External accounts (like emails used as identities, Facebook accounts, LDAP accounts, etc.) are stored in "ExternalAccount" objects. Currently, we have a very restrictive `CAN_VIEW` policy for ExternalAccounts, to add an extra layer of protection to make sure users can't use them in unintended ways. For example, it would be bad if a user could link their Phabricator account to a Facebook account without proper authentication. All of the controllers which do sensitive things have checks anyway, but a restrictive CAN_VIEW provided an extra layer of protection. Se T3116 for some discussion. However, this means that when grey/external users take actions (via email, or via applications like Legalpad) other users can't load the account handles and can't see anything about the actor (they just see "Restricted External Account" or similar). Balancing these concerns is mostly about not making a huge mess while doing it. This seems like a reasonable approach: - Add `CAN_EDIT` on these objects. - Make that very restricted, but open up `CAN_VIEW`. - Require `CAN_EDIT` any time we're going to do something authentication/identity related. This is slightly easier to get wrong (forget CAN_EDIT) than other approaches, but pretty simple, and we always have extra checks in place anyway -- this is just a safety net. I'm not quite sure how we should identify external accounts, so for now we're just rendering "Email User" or similar -- clearly not a bug, but not identifying. We can figure out what to render in the long term elsewhere. Test Plan: - Viewed external accounts. - Linked an external account. - Refreshed an external account. - Edited profile picture. - Viewed sessions panel. - Published a bunch of stuff to Asana/JIRA. - Legalpad signature page now shows external accounts. {F171595} Reviewers: chad, btrahan Reviewed By: btrahan Subscribers: epriestley Maniphest Tasks: T3732, T1205, T3116 Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D9767
2014-07-10 19:18:10 +02:00
'javelin-typeahead-preloaded-source' => '54f314a0',
'javelin-typeahead-source' => 'ab9e0a82',
'javelin-typeahead-static-source' => '6c0e62fa',
When logged-out users hit a "Login Required" dialog, try to choose a better "next" URI Summary: Ref T10004. After a user logs in, we send them to the "next" URI cookie if there is one, but currently don't always do a very good job of selecting a "next" URI, especially if they tried to do something with a dialog before being asked to log in. In particular, if a logged-out user clicks an action like "Edit Blocking Tasks" on a Maniphest task, the default behavior is to send them to the standalone page for that dialog after they log in. This can be pretty confusing. See T2691 and D6416 for earlier efforts here. At that time, we added a mechanism to //manually// override the default behavior, and fixed the most common links. This worked, but I'd like to fix the //default// beahvior so we don't need to remember to `setObjectURI()` correctly all over the place. ApplicationEditor has also introduced new cases which are more difficult to get right. While we could get them right by using the override and being careful about things, this also motivates fixing the default behavior. Finally, we have better tools for fixing the default behavior now than we did in 2013. Instead of using manual overrides, have JS include an "X-Phabricator-Via" header in Ajax requests. This is basically like a referrer header, and will contain the page the user's browser is on. In essentially every case, this should be a very good place (and often the best place) to send them after login. For all pages currently using `setObjectURI()`, it should produce the same behavior by default. I'll remove the `setObjectURI()` mechanism in the next diff. Test Plan: Clicked various workflow actions while logged out, saw "next" get set to a reasonable value, was redirected to a sensible, non-confusing page after login (the page with whatever button I clicked on it). Reviewers: chad Reviewed By: chad Maniphest Tasks: T10004 Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D14804
2015-12-17 15:10:04 +01:00
'javelin-uri' => 'c989ade3',
'javelin-util' => '93cc50d6',
'javelin-vector' => '2caa8fb8',
'javelin-view' => '0f764c35',
'javelin-view-html' => 'fe287620',
'javelin-view-interpreter' => 'f829edb3',
'javelin-view-renderer' => '6c2b09a2',
'javelin-view-visitor' => 'efe49472',
'javelin-websocket' => '3ffe32d6',
'javelin-workboard-board' => '8935deef',
'javelin-workboard-card' => 'c587b80f',
'javelin-workboard-column' => '758b4758',
'javelin-workboard-controller' => '26167537',
'javelin-workflow' => '6a726c55',
'maniphest-report-css' => '9b9580b7',
'maniphest-task-edit-css' => 'fda62a9b',
'maniphest-task-summary-css' => '11cc5344',
'multirow-row-manager' => 'b5d57730',
'owners-path-editor' => 'c96502cf',
'owners-path-editor-css' => '9c136c29',
'paste-css' => '9fcc9773',
'path-typeahead' => '6d8c7912',
'people-picture-menu-item-css' => 'a06f7f34',
'people-profile-css' => '4df76faf',
'phabricator-action-list-view-css' => '0bcd9a45',
'phabricator-busy' => '59a7976a',
'phabricator-chatlog-css' => 'd295b020',
'phabricator-content-source-view-css' => '4b8b05d4',
'phabricator-core-css' => '62fa3ace',
'phabricator-countdown-css' => '16c52f5c',
'phabricator-darklog' => 'c8e1ffe3',
'phabricator-darkmessage' => 'c48cccdd',
'phabricator-dashboard-css' => 'fe5b1869',
'phabricator-diff-changeset' => 'b49b59d6',
'phabricator-diff-changeset-list' => '0a84bcc1',
'phabricator-diff-inline' => 'e83d28f3',
'phabricator-drag-and-drop-file-upload' => '58dea2fa',
'phabricator-draggable-list' => 'bea6e7f4',
'phabricator-fatal-config-template-css' => '8f18fa41',
'phabricator-favicon' => '1fe2510c',
'phabricator-feed-css' => 'ecd4ec57',
'phabricator-file-upload' => '680ea2c8',
'phabricator-filetree-view-css' => 'b912ad97',
'phabricator-flag-css' => 'bba8f811',
'phabricator-keyboard-shortcut' => '1ae869f2',
'phabricator-keyboard-shortcut-manager' => 'c19dd9b9',
'phabricator-main-menu-view' => '1802a242',
'phabricator-nav-view-css' => '694d7723',
'phabricator-notification' => '4f774dac',
'phabricator-notification-css' => '457861ec',
'phabricator-notification-menu-css' => 'ef480927',
'phabricator-object-selector-css' => '85ee8ce6',
'phabricator-phtize' => 'd254d646',
'phabricator-prefab' => '77b0ae28',
'phabricator-remarkup-css' => 'b182076e',
'phabricator-search-results-css' => '505dd8cf',
Provide a global router for Ajax requests Summary: Fixes T430. Fixes T4834. Obsoletes D7641. Currently, we do some things less-well than we could: - We just let the browser queue and prioritize requests, so if you load a revision with 50 changes and then click "Award Token", the action blocks until the changes load in most/all browsers. It would be better to prioritize this action and queue it immediately. - Similarly, changes tend to load in order, even if the user has clicked to a specific file. When the user expresses a preference for a specific file, we should prioritize it. - We show a spinning GIF when waiting on requests. This is appropriate for some types of reuqests, but distracting for others. To fix this: - Queue all (or, at least, most) requests into a new queue in JX.Router. - JX.Router handles prioritizing the requests. Principally: - You can submit a request with a specific priority (500 = general content loading, 1000 = default, 2000 = explicit user action) and JX.Router will get the higher stuff fired off sooner. - You can name requests and then adjust their prorities later, if the user expresses an interest in specific results. - Only use the spinner gif for "workflow" requests, which is bascially when the user clicked something and we're waiting on the server. I think it's useful and not-annoying in this case. - Don't show any status for draft requests. - For content requests, show a subtle hipster-style top loading bar. Test Plan: - Viewed a diff with 93 changes, and clicked award token. - Prior to this patch, the action took many many seconds to resolve. - After this patch, it resolves quickly. - Viewed a diff with 93 changes and saw a pleasant subtle hipster-style loading bar. - Viewed a diff with 93 changes and typed some draft text. Previews populated fairly quickly and there was no spinner. - Viewed a diff with 93 changes and clicked something with workflow, saw a spinner after a moment. - Viewed a diff with 93 changes and clicked a file in the table of contents near the end of the list. - Prior to this patch, it took a long time to show up. - After this patch, it loads directly. Reviewers: chad, btrahan Reviewed By: btrahan Subscribers: epriestley Maniphest Tasks: T430, T4834 Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D8979
2014-05-05 19:57:42 +02:00
'phabricator-shaped-request' => '7cbe244b',
'phabricator-slowvote-css' => 'a94b7230',
'phabricator-source-code-view-css' => '2ab25dfa',
'phabricator-standard-page-view' => '34ee718b',
'phabricator-textareautils' => '320810c8',
'phabricator-title' => '485aaa6c',
'phabricator-tooltip' => '358b8c04',
'phabricator-ui-example-css' => '528b19de',
'phabricator-zindex-css' => '9d8f7c4b',
'phame-css' => '8cb3afcd',
'pholio-css' => 'ca89d380',
'pholio-edit-css' => '07676f51',
'pholio-inline-comments-css' => '8e545e49',
'phortune-credit-card-form' => '2290aeef',
'phortune-credit-card-form-css' => '8391eb02',
'phortune-css' => '5b99dae0',
'phortune-invoice-css' => '476055e2',
'phrequent-css' => 'ffc185ad',
'phriction-document-css' => '4282e4ad',
'phui-action-panel-css' => 'b4798122',
'phui-badge-view-css' => '22c0cf4f',
'phui-basic-nav-view-css' => '98c11ab3',
'phui-big-info-view-css' => 'acc3492c',
'phui-box-css' => '4bd6cdb9',
'phui-bulk-editor-css' => '9a81e5d5',
'phui-button-bar-css' => 'f1ff5494',
'phui-button-css' => '6ccb303c',
'phui-button-simple-css' => '8e1baf68',
'phui-calendar-css' => 'f1ddf11c',
'phui-calendar-day-css' => '572b1893',
'phui-calendar-list-css' => '576be600',
'phui-calendar-month-css' => '21154caf',
'phui-chart-css' => '6bf6f78e',
'phui-cms-css' => '504b4b23',
'phui-comment-form-css' => 'ac68149f',
'phui-comment-panel-css' => 'f50152ad',
'phui-crumbs-view-css' => '10728aaa',
'phui-curtain-view-css' => '2bdaf026',
'phui-document-summary-view-css' => '9ca48bdf',
'phui-document-view-css' => 'c4ac41f9',
'phui-document-view-pro-css' => 'dd79b5df',
'phui-feed-story-css' => '44a9c8e9',
'phui-font-icon-base-css' => '870a7360',
'phui-fontkit-css' => '1320ed01',
'phui-form-css' => '7aaa04e3',
'phui-form-view-css' => 'b04e08d9',
'phui-head-thing-view-css' => 'fd311e5f',
'phui-header-view-css' => '1ba8b707',
'phui-hovercard' => '1bd28176',
'phui-hovercard-view-css' => '4a484541',
'phui-icon-set-selector-css' => '87db8fee',
'phui-icon-view-css' => 'cf24ceec',
'phui-image-mask-css' => 'a8498f9c',
'phui-info-view-css' => 'e929f98c',
'phui-inline-comment-view-css' => '65ae3bc2',
'phui-invisible-character-view-css' => '6993d9f0',
'phui-left-right-css' => '75227a4d',
'phui-lightbox-css' => '0a035e40',
'phui-list-view-css' => '38f8c9bd',
'phui-object-box-css' => '9cff003c',
Replace the "Choose Subtype" radio buttons dialog with a simpler "big stuff you click" sort of UI Summary: Ref T13222. Fixes T12588. See PHI683. In several cases, we present the user with a choice between multiple major options: Alamnac service types, Drydock blueprint types, Repository VCS types, Herald rule types, etc. Today, we generally do this with radio buttons and a "Submit" button. This isn't terrible, but often it means users have to click twice (once on the radio; once on submit) when a single click would be sufficient. The radio click target can also be small. In other cases, we have a container with a link and we'd like to link the entire container: notifications, the `/drydock/` console, etc. We'd like to just link the entire container, but this causes some problems: - It's not legal to link block eleements like `<a><div> ... </div></a>` and some browsers actually get upset about it. - We can `<a><span> ... </span></a>` instead, then turn the `<span>` into a block element with CSS -- and this sometimes works, but also has some drawbacks: - It's not great to do that for screenreaders, since the readable text in the link isn't necessarily very meaningful. - We can't have any other links inside the element (e.g., details or documentation). - We can `<form><button> ... </button></form>` instead, but this has its own set of problems: - You can't right-click to interact with a button in the same way you can with a link. - Also not great for screenreaders. Instead, try adding a `linked-container` behavior which just means "when users click this element, pretend they clicked the first link inside it". This gives us natural HTML (real, legal HTML with actual `<a>` tags) and good screenreader behavior, but allows the effective link target to be visually larger than just the link. If no issues crop up with this, I'd plan to eventually use this technique in more places (Repositories, Herald, Almanac, Drydock, Notifications menu, etc). Test Plan: {F6053035} - Left-clicked and command-left-clicked the new JS fanciness, got sensible behaviors. Reviewers: amckinley Reviewed By: amckinley Subscribers: PHID-OPKG-gm6ozazyms6q6i22gyam Maniphest Tasks: T13222, T12588 Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D19855
2018-12-07 15:04:07 +01:00
'phui-oi-big-ui-css' => '7a7c22af',
'phui-oi-color-css' => 'cd2b9b77',
'phui-oi-drag-ui-css' => '08f4ccc3',
'phui-oi-flush-ui-css' => '9d9685d6',
'phui-oi-list-view-css' => '7c5c1291',
'phui-oi-simple-ui-css' => 'a8beebea',
'phui-pager-css' => 'edcbc226',
'phui-pinboard-view-css' => '2495140e',
'phui-property-list-view-css' => '546a04ae',
'phui-remarkup-preview-css' => '54a34863',
'phui-segment-bar-view-css' => 'b1d1b892',
'phui-spacing-css' => '042804d6',
'phui-status-list-view-css' => 'd5263e49',
'phui-tag-view-css' => 'b4719c50',
'phui-theme-css' => '9f261c6b',
'phui-timeline-view-css' => '6ddf8126',
'phui-two-column-view-css' => '44ec4951',
'phui-workboard-color-css' => '783cdff5',
'phui-workboard-view-css' => '3bc85455',
'phui-workcard-view-css' => 'cca5fa92',
'phui-workpanel-view-css' => 'a3a63478',
'phuix-action-list-view' => 'b5c256b8',
'phuix-action-view' => '8d4a8c72',
'phuix-autocomplete' => 'df1bbd34',
'phuix-button-view' => '85ac9772',
'phuix-dropdown-menu' => '04b2ae03',
'phuix-form-control-view' => '210a16c1',
'phuix-icon-view' => 'bff6884b',
'policy-css' => '957ea14c',
'policy-edit-css' => '815c66f7',
'policy-transaction-detail-css' => '82100a43',
'ponder-view-css' => 'fbd45f96',
'project-card-view-css' => '0010bb52',
'project-view-css' => '792c9057',
'releeph-core' => '9b3c5733',
'releeph-preview-branch' => 'b7a6f4a5',
'releeph-request-differential-create-dialog' => '8d8b92cd',
'releeph-request-typeahead-css' => '667a48ae',
'setup-issue-css' => '30ee0173',
'sprite-login-css' => '396f3c3a',
'sprite-tokens-css' => '9cdfd599',
'syntax-default-css' => '9923583c',
'syntax-highlighting-css' => 'e9c95dd4',
'tokens-css' => '3d0f239e',
'typeahead-browse-css' => 'f2818435',
'unhandled-exception-css' => '4c96257a',
),
'requires' => array(
'00676f00' => array(
'javelin-install',
'javelin-dom',
'javelin-typeahead-preloaded-source',
'javelin-util',
),
'013ffff9' => array(
'javelin-install',
'javelin-util',
'javelin-request',
'javelin-typeahead-source',
),
'01fca1f0' => array(
'javelin-behavior',
'javelin-workflow',
'javelin-json',
'javelin-dom',
'phabricator-keyboard-shortcut',
),
'0213259f' => array(
'javelin-behavior',
'javelin-uri',
),
'040fce04' => array(
'javelin-behavior',
'javelin-request',
),
'04b2ae03' => array(
'javelin-install',
'javelin-util',
'javelin-dom',
'javelin-vector',
'javelin-stratcom',
),
'051c7832' => array(
'javelin-behavior',
'javelin-stratcom',
'javelin-dom',
),
'05270951' => array(
'javelin-util',
'javelin-magical-init',
),
'065227cc' => array(
'javelin-behavior',
'javelin-dom',
'javelin-stratcom',
'javelin-workflow',
),
'08f4ccc3' => array(
'phui-oi-list-view-css',
),
'0a0b10e9' => array(
'javelin-behavior',
'javelin-stratcom',
'javelin-dom',
),
'0a3f3021' => array(
'javelin-behavior',
'javelin-stratcom',
'javelin-workflow',
'javelin-dom',
'javelin-router',
Provide a global router for Ajax requests Summary: Fixes T430. Fixes T4834. Obsoletes D7641. Currently, we do some things less-well than we could: - We just let the browser queue and prioritize requests, so if you load a revision with 50 changes and then click "Award Token", the action blocks until the changes load in most/all browsers. It would be better to prioritize this action and queue it immediately. - Similarly, changes tend to load in order, even if the user has clicked to a specific file. When the user expresses a preference for a specific file, we should prioritize it. - We show a spinning GIF when waiting on requests. This is appropriate for some types of reuqests, but distracting for others. To fix this: - Queue all (or, at least, most) requests into a new queue in JX.Router. - JX.Router handles prioritizing the requests. Principally: - You can submit a request with a specific priority (500 = general content loading, 1000 = default, 2000 = explicit user action) and JX.Router will get the higher stuff fired off sooner. - You can name requests and then adjust their prorities later, if the user expresses an interest in specific results. - Only use the spinner gif for "workflow" requests, which is bascially when the user clicked something and we're waiting on the server. I think it's useful and not-annoying in this case. - Don't show any status for draft requests. - For content requests, show a subtle hipster-style top loading bar. Test Plan: - Viewed a diff with 93 changes, and clicked award token. - Prior to this patch, the action took many many seconds to resolve. - After this patch, it resolves quickly. - Viewed a diff with 93 changes and saw a pleasant subtle hipster-style loading bar. - Viewed a diff with 93 changes and typed some draft text. Previews populated fairly quickly and there was no spinner. - Viewed a diff with 93 changes and clicked something with workflow, saw a spinner after a moment. - Viewed a diff with 93 changes and clicked a file in the table of contents near the end of the list. - Prior to this patch, it took a long time to show up. - After this patch, it loads directly. Reviewers: chad, btrahan Reviewed By: btrahan Subscribers: epriestley Maniphest Tasks: T430, T4834 Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D8979
2014-05-05 19:57:42 +02:00
),
'0a84bcc1' => array(
'javelin-install',
'phuix-button-view',
),
Remove "willRenderTimeline()" from ApplicationTransactionInterface Summary: Depends on D19914. Ref T11351. Some of the Phoilo rabbit holes go very deep. `PhabricatorApplicationTransactionInterface` currently requires you to implement `willRenderTimeline()`. Almost every object just implements this as `return $timeline`; only Pholio, Diffusion, and Differential specialize it. In all cases, they are specializing it mostly to render inline comments. The actual implementations are a bit of a weird mess and the way the data is threaded through the call stack is weird and not very modern. Try to clean this up: - Stop requiring `willRenderTimeline()` to be implemented. - Stop requiring `getApplicationTransactionViewObject()` to be implemented (only the three above, plus Legalpad, implement this, and Legalpad's implementation is a no-op). These two methods are inherently pretty coupled for almost any reasonable thing you might want to do with the timeline. - Simplify the handling of "renderdata" and call it "View Data". This is additional information about the current view of the transaction timeline that is required to render it correctly. This is only used in Differential, to decide if we can link an inline comment to an anchor on the same page or should link it to another page. We could perhaps do this on the client instead, but having this data doesn't seem inherently bad to me. - If objects want to customize timeline rendering, they now implement `PhabricatorTimelineInterface` and provide a `TimelineEngine` which gets a nice formal stack. This leaves a lot of empty `willRenderTimeline()` implementations hanging around. I'll remove these in the next change, it's just going to be deleting a couple dozen copies of an identical empty method implementation. Test Plan: - Viewed audits, revisions, and mocks with inline comments. - Used "Show Older" to page a revision back in history (this is relevant for "View Data"). - Grepped for symbols: willRenderTimeline, getApplicationTransactionViewObject, Legalpad classes. Reviewers: amckinley Reviewed By: amckinley Maniphest Tasks: T11351 Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D19918
2018-12-19 20:52:53 +01:00
'0e1eca96' => array(
'javelin-behavior',
'javelin-stratcom',
'javelin-dom',
'phabricator-busy',
),
'0f764c35' => array(
'javelin-install',
'javelin-util',
),
'15d5ff71' => array(
'aphront-typeahead-control-css',
'phui-tag-view-css',
),
'1802a242' => array(
'phui-theme-css',
),
'185bbd53' => array(
'javelin-install',
),
'1ad0a787' => array(
'javelin-install',
'javelin-reactor',
'javelin-util',
'javelin-reactor-node-calmer',
),
'1ae869f2' => array(
'javelin-install',
'javelin-util',
'phabricator-keyboard-shortcut-manager',
),
'1bd28176' => array(
'javelin-install',
'javelin-dom',
'javelin-vector',
'javelin-request',
'javelin-uri',
),
'1db13e70' => array(
'javelin-behavior',
'javelin-dom',
'javelin-json',
'javelin-workflow',
'javelin-magical-init',
),
'1f6794f6' => array(
'javelin-behavior',
'javelin-stratcom',
'javelin-workflow',
'javelin-dom',
'javelin-uri',
'phabricator-textareautils',
),
'1fe2510c' => array(
'javelin-install',
'javelin-dom',
),
'210a16c1' => array(
'javelin-install',
'javelin-dom',
),
'2290aeef' => array(
'javelin-install',
'javelin-dom',
'javelin-json',
'javelin-workflow',
'javelin-util',
),
26167537 => array(
'javelin-install',
'javelin-dom',
'javelin-util',
'javelin-vector',
'javelin-stratcom',
'javelin-workflow',
'phabricator-drag-and-drop-file-upload',
'javelin-workboard-board',
),
'27ca6289' => array(
'javelin-behavior',
'javelin-stratcom',
'javelin-dom',
'javelin-uri',
'phabricator-notification',
),
Replace the "Choose Subtype" radio buttons dialog with a simpler "big stuff you click" sort of UI Summary: Ref T13222. Fixes T12588. See PHI683. In several cases, we present the user with a choice between multiple major options: Alamnac service types, Drydock blueprint types, Repository VCS types, Herald rule types, etc. Today, we generally do this with radio buttons and a "Submit" button. This isn't terrible, but often it means users have to click twice (once on the radio; once on submit) when a single click would be sufficient. The radio click target can also be small. In other cases, we have a container with a link and we'd like to link the entire container: notifications, the `/drydock/` console, etc. We'd like to just link the entire container, but this causes some problems: - It's not legal to link block eleements like `<a><div> ... </div></a>` and some browsers actually get upset about it. - We can `<a><span> ... </span></a>` instead, then turn the `<span>` into a block element with CSS -- and this sometimes works, but also has some drawbacks: - It's not great to do that for screenreaders, since the readable text in the link isn't necessarily very meaningful. - We can't have any other links inside the element (e.g., details or documentation). - We can `<form><button> ... </button></form>` instead, but this has its own set of problems: - You can't right-click to interact with a button in the same way you can with a link. - Also not great for screenreaders. Instead, try adding a `linked-container` behavior which just means "when users click this element, pretend they clicked the first link inside it". This gives us natural HTML (real, legal HTML with actual `<a>` tags) and good screenreader behavior, but allows the effective link target to be visually larger than just the link. If no issues crop up with this, I'd plan to eventually use this technique in more places (Repositories, Herald, Almanac, Drydock, Notifications menu, etc). Test Plan: {F6053035} - Left-clicked and command-left-clicked the new JS fanciness, got sensible behaviors. Reviewers: amckinley Reviewed By: amckinley Subscribers: PHID-OPKG-gm6ozazyms6q6i22gyam Maniphest Tasks: T13222, T12588 Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D19855
2018-12-07 15:04:07 +01:00
'291da458' => array(
'javelin-behavior',
'javelin-dom',
),
'2926fff2' => array(
'javelin-behavior',
'javelin-dom',
),
'29274e2b' => array(
'javelin-install',
'javelin-util',
Provide a global router for Ajax requests Summary: Fixes T430. Fixes T4834. Obsoletes D7641. Currently, we do some things less-well than we could: - We just let the browser queue and prioritize requests, so if you load a revision with 50 changes and then click "Award Token", the action blocks until the changes load in most/all browsers. It would be better to prioritize this action and queue it immediately. - Similarly, changes tend to load in order, even if the user has clicked to a specific file. When the user expresses a preference for a specific file, we should prioritize it. - We show a spinning GIF when waiting on requests. This is appropriate for some types of reuqests, but distracting for others. To fix this: - Queue all (or, at least, most) requests into a new queue in JX.Router. - JX.Router handles prioritizing the requests. Principally: - You can submit a request with a specific priority (500 = general content loading, 1000 = default, 2000 = explicit user action) and JX.Router will get the higher stuff fired off sooner. - You can name requests and then adjust their prorities later, if the user expresses an interest in specific results. - Only use the spinner gif for "workflow" requests, which is bascially when the user clicked something and we're waiting on the server. I think it's useful and not-annoying in this case. - Don't show any status for draft requests. - For content requests, show a subtle hipster-style top loading bar. Test Plan: - Viewed a diff with 93 changes, and clicked award token. - Prior to this patch, the action took many many seconds to resolve. - After this patch, it resolves quickly. - Viewed a diff with 93 changes and saw a pleasant subtle hipster-style loading bar. - Viewed a diff with 93 changes and typed some draft text. Previews populated fairly quickly and there was no spinner. - Viewed a diff with 93 changes and clicked something with workflow, saw a spinner after a moment. - Viewed a diff with 93 changes and clicked a file in the table of contents near the end of the list. - Prior to this patch, it took a long time to show up. - After this patch, it loads directly. Reviewers: chad, btrahan Reviewed By: btrahan Subscribers: epriestley Maniphest Tasks: T430, T4834 Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D8979
2014-05-05 19:57:42 +02:00
),
'2ae077e1' => array(
'javelin-behavior',
'javelin-dom',
'javelin-stratcom',
'javelin-behavior-device',
'javelin-scrollbar',
'javelin-quicksand',
'phabricator-keyboard-shortcut',
'conpherence-thread-manager',
),
'2b8de964' => array(
'javelin-install',
'javelin-util',
),
'2caa8fb8' => array(
'javelin-install',
'javelin-event',
),
'31420f77' => array(
'javelin-behavior',
),
'320810c8' => array(
'javelin-install',
Allow installs to customize project icons Summary: Ref T10010. Ref T5819. General alignment of the stars: - There were some hacks in Conduit around stripping `fa-...` off icons when reading and writing that I wanted to get rid of. - We probably have room for a subtitle in the new heavy nav, and using the icon name is a good starting point (and maybe good enough on its own?) - The project list was real bad looking with redundant tag/names, now it is very slightly less bad looking with non-redundant types? - Some installs will want to call Milestones something else, and this gets us a big part of the way there. - This may slightly help to reinforce "tag" vs "policy" vs "group" stuff? --- I'm letting installs have enough rope to shoot themselves in the foot (e.g., define 100 icons). It isn't the end of the world if they reuse icons, and is clearly their fault. I think the cases where 100 icons will break down are: - Icon selector dialog may get very unwieldy. - Query UI will be pretty iffy/huge with 100 icons. We could improve these fairly easily if an install comes up with a reasonable use case for having 100 icons. --- The UI on the icon itself in the list views is a little iffy -- mostly, it's too saturated/bold. I'd ideally like to try either: - rendering a "shade" version (i.e. lighter, less-saturated color); or - rendering a "shade" tag with just the icon in it. However, there didn't seem to be a way to do the first one right now (`fa-example sh-blue` doesn't work) and the second one had weird margins/padding, so I left it like this for now. I figure we can clean it up once we build the thick nav, since that will probably also want an identical element. (I don't want to render a full tag with the icon + name since I think that's confusing -- it looks like a project/object tag, but is not.) Test Plan: {F1049905} {F1049906} Reviewers: chad Reviewed By: chad Subscribers: 20after4, Luke081515.2 Maniphest Tasks: T5819, T10010 Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D14918
2015-12-30 13:36:48 +01:00
'javelin-dom',
'javelin-vector',
Allow installs to customize project icons Summary: Ref T10010. Ref T5819. General alignment of the stars: - There were some hacks in Conduit around stripping `fa-...` off icons when reading and writing that I wanted to get rid of. - We probably have room for a subtitle in the new heavy nav, and using the icon name is a good starting point (and maybe good enough on its own?) - The project list was real bad looking with redundant tag/names, now it is very slightly less bad looking with non-redundant types? - Some installs will want to call Milestones something else, and this gets us a big part of the way there. - This may slightly help to reinforce "tag" vs "policy" vs "group" stuff? --- I'm letting installs have enough rope to shoot themselves in the foot (e.g., define 100 icons). It isn't the end of the world if they reuse icons, and is clearly their fault. I think the cases where 100 icons will break down are: - Icon selector dialog may get very unwieldy. - Query UI will be pretty iffy/huge with 100 icons. We could improve these fairly easily if an install comes up with a reasonable use case for having 100 icons. --- The UI on the icon itself in the list views is a little iffy -- mostly, it's too saturated/bold. I'd ideally like to try either: - rendering a "shade" version (i.e. lighter, less-saturated color); or - rendering a "shade" tag with just the icon in it. However, there didn't seem to be a way to do the first one right now (`fa-example sh-blue` doesn't work) and the second one had weird margins/padding, so I left it like this for now. I figure we can clean it up once we build the thick nav, since that will probably also want an identical element. (I don't want to render a full tag with the icon + name since I think that's confusing -- it looks like a project/object tag, but is not.) Test Plan: {F1049905} {F1049906} Reviewers: chad Reviewed By: chad Subscribers: 20after4, Luke081515.2 Maniphest Tasks: T5819, T10010 Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D14918
2015-12-30 13:36:48 +01:00
),
'327a00d1' => array(
'javelin-behavior',
'javelin-stratcom',
'javelin-dom',
'javelin-workflow',
),
Emit a "Content-Security-Policy" HTTP header Summary: See PHI399. Ref T4340. This header provides an additional layer of protection against various attacks, including XSS attacks which embed inline `<script ...>` or `onhover="..."` content into the document. **style-src**: The "unsafe-inline" directive affects both `style="..."` and `<style>`. We use a lot of `style="..."`, some very legitimately, so we can't realistically get away from this any time soon. We only use one `<style>` (for monospaced font preferences) but can't disable `<style>` without disabling `style="..."`. **img-src**: We use "data:" URIs to inline small images into CSS, and there's a significant performance benefit from doing this. There doesn't seem to be a way to allow "data" URIs in CSS without allowing them in the document itself. **script-src** and **frame-src**: For a small number of flows (Recaptcha, Stripe) we embed external javascript, some of which embeds child elements (or additional resources) into the document. We now whitelist these narrowly on the respective pages. This won't work with Quicksand, so I've blacklisted it for now. **connect-src**: We need to include `'self'` for AJAX to work, and any websocket URIs. **Clickjacking**: We now have three layers of protection: - X-Frame-Options: works in older browsers. - `frame-ancestors 'none'`: does the same thing. - Explicit framebust in JX.Stratcom after initialization: works in ancient IE. We could probably drop the explicit framebust but it wasn't difficult to retain. **script tags**: We previously used an inline `<script>` tag to start Javelin. I've moved this to `<data data-javelin-init ...>` tags, which seems to work properly. **`__DEV__`**: We previously used an inline `<script>` tag to set the `__DEV__` mode flag. I tried using the "initialization" tags for this, but they fire too late. I moved it to `<html data-developer-mode="1">`, which seems OK everywhere. **CSP Scope**: Only the CSP header on the original request appears to matter -- you can't refine the scope by emitting headers on CSS/JS. To reduce confusion, I disabled the headers on those response types. More headers could be disabled, although we're likely already deep in the land of diminishing returns. **Initialization**: The initialization sequence has changed slightly. Previously, we waited for the <script> in bottom of the document to evaluate. Now, we go fishing for tags when domcontentready fires. Test Plan: - Browsed around in Firefox, Safari and Chrome looking for console warnings. Interacted with various Javascript behaviors. Enabled Quicksand. - Disabled all the framebusting, launched a clickjacking attack, verified that each layer of protection is individually effective. - Verified that the XHProf iframe in Darkconsole and the PHPAST frame layout work properly. - Enabled notifications, verified no complaints about connecting to Aphlict. - Hit `__DEV__` mode warnings based on the new data attribute. - Tried to do sketchy stuff with `data:` URIs and SVGs. This works but doesn't seem to be able to do anything dangerous. - Went through the Stripe and Recaptcha workflows. - Dumped and examined the CSP headers with `curl`, etc. - Added a raw <script> tag to a page (as though I'd found an XSS attack), verified it was no longer executed. Maniphest Tasks: T4340 Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D19143
2018-02-27 15:56:15 +01:00
'327f418a' => array(
'javelin-install',
'javelin-event',
'javelin-util',
'javelin-magical-init',
),
'358b8c04' => array(
'javelin-install',
'javelin-util',
'javelin-dom',
'javelin-vector',
),
'3935d8c4' => array(
'javelin-behavior',
'javelin-dom',
'javelin-stratcom',
),
'3ab51e2c' => array(
'javelin-behavior',
'javelin-behavior-device',
'javelin-stratcom',
'javelin-vector',
'javelin-dom',
'javelin-magical-init',
),
'3cb0b2fc' => array(
'javelin-behavior',
'javelin-dom',
'javelin-stratcom',
'javelin-workflow',
'javelin-util',
'javelin-uri',
),
'3dbf94d5' => array(
'javelin-behavior',
'javelin-dom',
'javelin-util',
'javelin-workflow',
'javelin-stratcom',
),
'3ffe32d6' => array(
'javelin-install',
),
'4047cd35' => array(
'javelin-behavior',
'javelin-dom',
'javelin-util',
'javelin-stratcom',
'javelin-workflow',
'javelin-behavior-device',
'javelin-history',
'javelin-vector',
'javelin-scrollbar',
'phabricator-title',
'phabricator-shaped-request',
'conpherence-thread-manager',
),
'408bf173' => array(
'javelin-behavior',
'javelin-dom',
'javelin-util',
'javelin-stratcom',
'javelin-workflow',
'phabricator-draggable-list',
),
'4250a34e' => array(
'javelin-behavior',
'javelin-dom',
'javelin-util',
'javelin-vector',
'javelin-stratcom',
'javelin-workflow',
'javelin-workboard-controller',
),
'44959b73' => array(
'javelin-util',
'javelin-uri',
'javelin-install',
),
'453c5375' => array(
'javelin-behavior',
'javelin-dom',
),
'464259a2' => array(
'javelin-behavior',
'javelin-stratcom',
'javelin-dom',
),
'469c0d9e' => array(
'javelin-behavior',
'javelin-dom',
'javelin-workflow',
),
47830651 => array(
'javelin-behavior',
'javelin-dom',
'javelin-view-renderer',
'javelin-install',
),
48086888 => array(
'javelin-behavior',
'javelin-dom',
'javelin-workflow',
),
'484a6e22' => array(
'javelin-behavior',
'javelin-dom',
'phabricator-drag-and-drop-file-upload',
'phabricator-textareautils',
),
'485aaa6c' => array(
'javelin-install',
),
'491416b3' => array(
'javelin-behavior',
'javelin-uri',
'phabricator-notification',
),
'4976858c' => array(
'javelin-magical-init',
'javelin-install',
'javelin-util',
'javelin-vector',
'javelin-stratcom',
),
'4b3c4443' => array(
'phuix-icon-view',
),
'4b700e9e' => array(
'javelin-behavior',
'javelin-dom',
'javelin-util',
'phabricator-shaped-request',
),
'4c193c96' => array(
'javelin-behavior',
'javelin-uri',
'phabricator-notification',
),
Fix several duplication/replay behaviors in Aphlict Summary: Ref T12566. Ref T12563. This fixes three bugs with Aphlict replay stuff: First, Conphernece would try to repaint the UI even if no thread was open. Only repaint when a thread is open. Second, although we deduplicate JX.Leader messages, we didn't deduplicate actual notification messages. If you browsed the leader window, then it re-elected itelf as a leader and replayed history, it could rebroadcast notifications and other windows could show doubles. Deduplicate notifications to prevent this. Third, we always replayed the last 60 seconds of history. When you browsed the leader window, whichever window became the new leader (possibly the one you just browsed) could replay messages from before it had opened, leading to duplicate messages. Particularly, after receiving a message and then browsing you could see that message again. Instead, only replay history as far back as when the window first opened. Test Plan: - Clicked "Repaint" with a thread open, saw a repaint. Clicked "Repaint" with Conpherence open but no thread, no repaint and no 404 request to `/update/null/`. - In browser A, opened three windows. In browser B, sent a notification. In browser A, browsed the leader window away twice in a row. Observed that the window which never became a leader doesn't duplicate notifications. - In browser A, opened three windows. In browser B, sent a notification. In browser A, browsed the leader window away over and over again. Observed that replay requests issued with appropriate history windows. Reviewers: chad Reviewed By: chad Maniphest Tasks: T12566, T12563 Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D17722
2017-04-18 20:14:37 +02:00
'4d863052' => array(
'javelin-dom',
'javelin-util',
'javelin-stratcom',
'javelin-install',
'javelin-aphlict',
'javelin-workflow',
'javelin-router',
'javelin-behavior-device',
'javelin-vector',
),
'4e3e79a6' => array(
'javelin-behavior',
'javelin-stratcom',
'javelin-dom',
),
'4f774dac' => array(
'javelin-install',
'javelin-dom',
'javelin-stratcom',
'javelin-util',
'phabricator-notification-css',
),
'503e17fd' => array(
'javelin-install',
'javelin-typeahead-source',
'javelin-util',
Introduce CAN_EDIT for ExternalAccount, and make CAN_VIEW more liberal Summary: Fixes T3732. Ref T1205. Ref T3116. External accounts (like emails used as identities, Facebook accounts, LDAP accounts, etc.) are stored in "ExternalAccount" objects. Currently, we have a very restrictive `CAN_VIEW` policy for ExternalAccounts, to add an extra layer of protection to make sure users can't use them in unintended ways. For example, it would be bad if a user could link their Phabricator account to a Facebook account without proper authentication. All of the controllers which do sensitive things have checks anyway, but a restrictive CAN_VIEW provided an extra layer of protection. Se T3116 for some discussion. However, this means that when grey/external users take actions (via email, or via applications like Legalpad) other users can't load the account handles and can't see anything about the actor (they just see "Restricted External Account" or similar). Balancing these concerns is mostly about not making a huge mess while doing it. This seems like a reasonable approach: - Add `CAN_EDIT` on these objects. - Make that very restricted, but open up `CAN_VIEW`. - Require `CAN_EDIT` any time we're going to do something authentication/identity related. This is slightly easier to get wrong (forget CAN_EDIT) than other approaches, but pretty simple, and we always have extra checks in place anyway -- this is just a safety net. I'm not quite sure how we should identify external accounts, so for now we're just rendering "Email User" or similar -- clearly not a bug, but not identifying. We can figure out what to render in the long term elsewhere. Test Plan: - Viewed external accounts. - Linked an external account. - Refreshed an external account. - Edited profile picture. - Viewed sessions panel. - Published a bunch of stuff to Asana/JIRA. - Legalpad signature page now shows external accounts. {F171595} Reviewers: chad, btrahan Reviewed By: btrahan Subscribers: epriestley Maniphest Tasks: T3732, T1205, T3116 Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D9767
2014-07-10 19:18:10 +02:00
),
'522431f7' => array(
'javelin-behavior',
'javelin-util',
'javelin-dom',
'javelin-stratcom',
'javelin-vector',
'javelin-typeahead-static-source',
),
'549459b8' => array(
'javelin-behavior',
),
'54b612ba' => array(
'javelin-color',
'javelin-install',
'javelin-util',
),
'54f314a0' => array(
'javelin-install',
'javelin-util',
'javelin-request',
'javelin-typeahead-source',
Introduce CAN_EDIT for ExternalAccount, and make CAN_VIEW more liberal Summary: Fixes T3732. Ref T1205. Ref T3116. External accounts (like emails used as identities, Facebook accounts, LDAP accounts, etc.) are stored in "ExternalAccount" objects. Currently, we have a very restrictive `CAN_VIEW` policy for ExternalAccounts, to add an extra layer of protection to make sure users can't use them in unintended ways. For example, it would be bad if a user could link their Phabricator account to a Facebook account without proper authentication. All of the controllers which do sensitive things have checks anyway, but a restrictive CAN_VIEW provided an extra layer of protection. Se T3116 for some discussion. However, this means that when grey/external users take actions (via email, or via applications like Legalpad) other users can't load the account handles and can't see anything about the actor (they just see "Restricted External Account" or similar). Balancing these concerns is mostly about not making a huge mess while doing it. This seems like a reasonable approach: - Add `CAN_EDIT` on these objects. - Make that very restricted, but open up `CAN_VIEW`. - Require `CAN_EDIT` any time we're going to do something authentication/identity related. This is slightly easier to get wrong (forget CAN_EDIT) than other approaches, but pretty simple, and we always have extra checks in place anyway -- this is just a safety net. I'm not quite sure how we should identify external accounts, so for now we're just rendering "Email User" or similar -- clearly not a bug, but not identifying. We can figure out what to render in the long term elsewhere. Test Plan: - Viewed external accounts. - Linked an external account. - Refreshed an external account. - Edited profile picture. - Viewed sessions panel. - Published a bunch of stuff to Asana/JIRA. - Legalpad signature page now shows external accounts. {F171595} Reviewers: chad, btrahan Reviewed By: btrahan Subscribers: epriestley Maniphest Tasks: T3732, T1205, T3116 Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D9767
2014-07-10 19:18:10 +02:00
),
'55616e04' => array(
'javelin-behavior',
'javelin-dom',
'javelin-util',
'javelin-workflow',
'javelin-stratcom',
'conpherence-thread-manager',
),
'558829c2' => array(
'javelin-stratcom',
'javelin-behavior',
'javelin-vector',
'javelin-dom',
),
'58dea2fa' => array(
'javelin-install',
'javelin-util',
'javelin-request',
'javelin-dom',
'javelin-uri',
'phabricator-file-upload',
),
'599a8f5f' => array(
'javelin-behavior',
'javelin-aphlict',
'javelin-stratcom',
'javelin-request',
'javelin-uri',
'javelin-dom',
'javelin-json',
'javelin-router',
'javelin-util',
'javelin-leader',
'javelin-sound',
'phabricator-notification',
),
'59a7976a' => array(
'javelin-install',
'javelin-dom',
'javelin-fx',
),
'59b251eb' => array(
'javelin-behavior',
'javelin-stratcom',
'javelin-vector',
'javelin-dom',
),
'5c54cbf3' => array(
'javelin-behavior',
'javelin-stratcom',
'javelin-dom',
),
'5e2634b9' => array(
'javelin-behavior',
'javelin-aphlict',
'phabricator-phtize',
'javelin-dom',
),
'5e9f347c' => array(
'javelin-behavior',
'multirow-row-manager',
'javelin-dom',
'javelin-util',
'phabricator-prefab',
'javelin-json',
),
'60821bc7' => array(
'javelin-behavior',
'javelin-stratcom',
'javelin-dom',
),
'61cbc29a' => array(
'javelin-magical-init',
'javelin-util',
),
'62dfea03' => array(
'javelin-install',
'javelin-util',
),
'635de1ec' => array(
'javelin-behavior',
'javelin-stratcom',
'javelin-workflow',
'javelin-dom',
),
66888767 => array(
'javelin-behavior',
'javelin-stratcom',
'javelin-util',
'javelin-dom',
'javelin-request',
'phabricator-keyboard-shortcut',
'phabricator-darklog',
'phabricator-darkmessage',
),
'66a62306' => array(
'javelin-behavior',
'javelin-stratcom',
'javelin-dom',
'javelin-history',
),
'66a6def1' => array(
'javelin-behavior',
'javelin-dom',
'javelin-util',
'multirow-row-manager',
'javelin-json',
'phuix-form-control-view',
),
'680ea2c8' => array(
'javelin-install',
'javelin-dom',
'phabricator-notification',
),
'68af71ca' => array(
'javelin-install',
'javelin-dom',
'phuix-button-view',
),
'69adf288' => array(
'javelin-install',
),
'6a726c55' => array(
'javelin-stratcom',
'javelin-request',
'javelin-dom',
'javelin-vector',
'javelin-install',
'javelin-util',
'javelin-mask',
'javelin-uri',
'javelin-routable',
),
'6b31879a' => array(
'javelin-behavior',
'javelin-stratcom',
'javelin-dom',
'javelin-mask',
'javelin-util',
'phuix-icon-view',
'phabricator-busy',
),
When logged-out users hit a "Login Required" dialog, try to choose a better "next" URI Summary: Ref T10004. After a user logs in, we send them to the "next" URI cookie if there is one, but currently don't always do a very good job of selecting a "next" URI, especially if they tried to do something with a dialog before being asked to log in. In particular, if a logged-out user clicks an action like "Edit Blocking Tasks" on a Maniphest task, the default behavior is to send them to the standalone page for that dialog after they log in. This can be pretty confusing. See T2691 and D6416 for earlier efforts here. At that time, we added a mechanism to //manually// override the default behavior, and fixed the most common links. This worked, but I'd like to fix the //default// beahvior so we don't need to remember to `setObjectURI()` correctly all over the place. ApplicationEditor has also introduced new cases which are more difficult to get right. While we could get them right by using the override and being careful about things, this also motivates fixing the default behavior. Finally, we have better tools for fixing the default behavior now than we did in 2013. Instead of using manual overrides, have JS include an "X-Phabricator-Via" header in Ajax requests. This is basically like a referrer header, and will contain the page the user's browser is on. In essentially every case, this should be a very good place (and often the best place) to send them after login. For all pages currently using `setObjectURI()`, it should produce the same behavior by default. I'll remove the `setObjectURI()` mechanism in the next diff. Test Plan: Clicked various workflow actions while logged out, saw "next" get set to a reasonable value, was redirected to a sensible, non-confusing page after login (the page with whatever button I clicked on it). Reviewers: chad Reviewed By: chad Maniphest Tasks: T10004 Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D14804
2015-12-17 15:10:04 +01:00
'6b8ef10b' => array(
'javelin-install',
),
'6c0e62fa' => array(
'javelin-install',
'javelin-typeahead-source',
),
'6c2b09a2' => array(
'javelin-install',
'javelin-util',
),
'6d3e1947' => array(
'javelin-behavior',
'javelin-diffusion-locate-file-source',
'javelin-dom',
'javelin-typeahead',
'javelin-uri',
),
'6d8c7912' => array(
'javelin-install',
'javelin-typeahead',
'javelin-dom',
'javelin-request',
'javelin-typeahead-ondemand-source',
'javelin-util',
),
'70baed2f' => array(
'javelin-install',
'javelin-dom',
'javelin-vector',
'javelin-util',
),
71237763 => array(
'javelin-behavior',
'javelin-dom',
'javelin-stratcom',
'javelin-workflow',
'phabricator-draggable-list',
),
'7319e029' => array(
'javelin-behavior',
'javelin-dom',
),
'758b4758' => array(
'javelin-install',
'javelin-workboard-card',
),
'75b83cbb' => array(
'javelin-behavior',
'javelin-dom',
'javelin-stratcom',
),
'76b9fc3e' => array(
'javelin-behavior',
'javelin-stratcom',
'javelin-workflow',
'javelin-dom',
'phabricator-draggable-list',
),
'76f4ebed' => array(
'javelin-install',
'javelin-reactor',
'javelin-util',
),
'77b0ae28' => array(
'javelin-install',
'javelin-util',
'javelin-dom',
'javelin-typeahead',
'javelin-tokenizer',
'javelin-typeahead-preloaded-source',
'javelin-typeahead-ondemand-source',
'javelin-dom',
'javelin-stratcom',
'javelin-util',
),
'77c1f0b0' => array(
'javelin-behavior',
'javelin-dom',
'javelin-request',
'javelin-util',
),
'7927a7d3' => array(
'javelin-behavior',
'javelin-quicksand',
),
'7a68dda3' => array(
'owners-path-editor',
'javelin-behavior',
),
Replace the "Choose Subtype" radio buttons dialog with a simpler "big stuff you click" sort of UI Summary: Ref T13222. Fixes T12588. See PHI683. In several cases, we present the user with a choice between multiple major options: Alamnac service types, Drydock blueprint types, Repository VCS types, Herald rule types, etc. Today, we generally do this with radio buttons and a "Submit" button. This isn't terrible, but often it means users have to click twice (once on the radio; once on submit) when a single click would be sufficient. The radio click target can also be small. In other cases, we have a container with a link and we'd like to link the entire container: notifications, the `/drydock/` console, etc. We'd like to just link the entire container, but this causes some problems: - It's not legal to link block eleements like `<a><div> ... </div></a>` and some browsers actually get upset about it. - We can `<a><span> ... </span></a>` instead, then turn the `<span>` into a block element with CSS -- and this sometimes works, but also has some drawbacks: - It's not great to do that for screenreaders, since the readable text in the link isn't necessarily very meaningful. - We can't have any other links inside the element (e.g., details or documentation). - We can `<form><button> ... </button></form>` instead, but this has its own set of problems: - You can't right-click to interact with a button in the same way you can with a link. - Also not great for screenreaders. Instead, try adding a `linked-container` behavior which just means "when users click this element, pretend they clicked the first link inside it". This gives us natural HTML (real, legal HTML with actual `<a>` tags) and good screenreader behavior, but allows the effective link target to be visually larger than just the link. If no issues crop up with this, I'd plan to eventually use this technique in more places (Repositories, Herald, Almanac, Drydock, Notifications menu, etc). Test Plan: {F6053035} - Left-clicked and command-left-clicked the new JS fanciness, got sensible behaviors. Reviewers: amckinley Reviewed By: amckinley Subscribers: PHID-OPKG-gm6ozazyms6q6i22gyam Maniphest Tasks: T13222, T12588 Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D19855
2018-12-07 15:04:07 +01:00
'7a7c22af' => array(
'phui-oi-list-view-css',
),
'7cbe244b' => array(
'javelin-install',
'javelin-util',
'javelin-request',
'javelin-router',
Provide a global router for Ajax requests Summary: Fixes T430. Fixes T4834. Obsoletes D7641. Currently, we do some things less-well than we could: - We just let the browser queue and prioritize requests, so if you load a revision with 50 changes and then click "Award Token", the action blocks until the changes load in most/all browsers. It would be better to prioritize this action and queue it immediately. - Similarly, changes tend to load in order, even if the user has clicked to a specific file. When the user expresses a preference for a specific file, we should prioritize it. - We show a spinning GIF when waiting on requests. This is appropriate for some types of reuqests, but distracting for others. To fix this: - Queue all (or, at least, most) requests into a new queue in JX.Router. - JX.Router handles prioritizing the requests. Principally: - You can submit a request with a specific priority (500 = general content loading, 1000 = default, 2000 = explicit user action) and JX.Router will get the higher stuff fired off sooner. - You can name requests and then adjust their prorities later, if the user expresses an interest in specific results. - Only use the spinner gif for "workflow" requests, which is bascially when the user clicked something and we're waiting on the server. I think it's useful and not-annoying in this case. - Don't show any status for draft requests. - For content requests, show a subtle hipster-style top loading bar. Test Plan: - Viewed a diff with 93 changes, and clicked award token. - Prior to this patch, the action took many many seconds to resolve. - After this patch, it resolves quickly. - Viewed a diff with 93 changes and saw a pleasant subtle hipster-style loading bar. - Viewed a diff with 93 changes and typed some draft text. Previews populated fairly quickly and there was no spinner. - Viewed a diff with 93 changes and clicked something with workflow, saw a spinner after a moment. - Viewed a diff with 93 changes and clicked a file in the table of contents near the end of the list. - Prior to this patch, it took a long time to show up. - After this patch, it loads directly. Reviewers: chad, btrahan Reviewed By: btrahan Subscribers: epriestley Maniphest Tasks: T430, T4834 Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D8979
2014-05-05 19:57:42 +02:00
),
'7e41274a' => array(
'javelin-install',
),
'7ebaeed3' => array(
'herald-rule-editor',
'javelin-behavior',
),
'7ee2b591' => array(
'javelin-behavior',
'javelin-history',
),
'7f243deb' => array(
'javelin-install',
),
'834a1173' => array(
'javelin-behavior',
'javelin-scrollbar',
),
'8499b6ab' => array(
'javelin-behavior',
'javelin-dom',
'javelin-stratcom',
),
'85ac9772' => array(
'javelin-install',
'javelin-dom',
),
'85ee8ce6' => array(
'aphront-dialog-view-css',
),
'88236f00' => array(
'javelin-behavior',
'phabricator-keyboard-shortcut',
'javelin-stratcom',
),
'8935deef' => array(
'javelin-install',
'javelin-dom',
'javelin-util',
'javelin-stratcom',
'javelin-workflow',
'phabricator-draggable-list',
'javelin-workboard-column',
),
'8a41885b' => array(
'javelin-install',
'javelin-dom',
Introduce CAN_EDIT for ExternalAccount, and make CAN_VIEW more liberal Summary: Fixes T3732. Ref T1205. Ref T3116. External accounts (like emails used as identities, Facebook accounts, LDAP accounts, etc.) are stored in "ExternalAccount" objects. Currently, we have a very restrictive `CAN_VIEW` policy for ExternalAccounts, to add an extra layer of protection to make sure users can't use them in unintended ways. For example, it would be bad if a user could link their Phabricator account to a Facebook account without proper authentication. All of the controllers which do sensitive things have checks anyway, but a restrictive CAN_VIEW provided an extra layer of protection. Se T3116 for some discussion. However, this means that when grey/external users take actions (via email, or via applications like Legalpad) other users can't load the account handles and can't see anything about the actor (they just see "Restricted External Account" or similar). Balancing these concerns is mostly about not making a huge mess while doing it. This seems like a reasonable approach: - Add `CAN_EDIT` on these objects. - Make that very restricted, but open up `CAN_VIEW`. - Require `CAN_EDIT` any time we're going to do something authentication/identity related. This is slightly easier to get wrong (forget CAN_EDIT) than other approaches, but pretty simple, and we always have extra checks in place anyway -- this is just a safety net. I'm not quite sure how we should identify external accounts, so for now we're just rendering "Email User" or similar -- clearly not a bug, but not identifying. We can figure out what to render in the long term elsewhere. Test Plan: - Viewed external accounts. - Linked an external account. - Refreshed an external account. - Edited profile picture. - Viewed sessions panel. - Published a bunch of stuff to Asana/JIRA. - Legalpad signature page now shows external accounts. {F171595} Reviewers: chad, btrahan Reviewed By: btrahan Subscribers: epriestley Maniphest Tasks: T3732, T1205, T3116 Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D9767
2014-07-10 19:18:10 +02:00
),
'8ce821c5' => array(
'phabricator-notification',
'javelin-stratcom',
'javelin-behavior',
),
'8d4a8c72' => array(
'javelin-install',
'javelin-dom',
'javelin-util',
),
'8e1baf68' => array(
'phui-button-css',
),
'8ff5e24c' => array(
'javelin-behavior',
'javelin-stratcom',
'javelin-dom',
),
'901935ef' => array(
'javelin-behavior',
'javelin-dom',
'javelin-request',
),
'9065f639' => array(
'javelin-install',
'javelin-dom',
'javelin-stratcom',
'javelin-vector',
),
'92b9ec77' => array(
'javelin-behavior',
'javelin-stratcom',
'javelin-dom',
),
'93d0c9e3' => array(
'javelin-behavior',
'javelin-stratcom',
'javelin-workflow',
'javelin-dom',
),
'949c0fe5' => array(
'javelin-install',
),
'94b750d2' => array(
'javelin-install',
'javelin-stratcom',
'javelin-util',
'javelin-behavior',
'javelin-json',
'javelin-dom',
'javelin-resource',
'javelin-routable',
),
'960f6a39' => array(
'javelin-behavior',
'javelin-dom',
'javelin-uri',
'javelin-mask',
'phabricator-drag-and-drop-file-upload',
),
'9a860428' => array(
'javelin-behavior',
'javelin-dom',
'javelin-stratcom',
'javelin-uri',
),
'9bbf3762' => array(
'javelin-behavior',
'javelin-dom',
'javelin-util',
'javelin-workflow',
'javelin-stratcom',
),
'9d32bc88' => array(
'javelin-behavior',
'javelin-behavior-device',
'javelin-stratcom',
'javelin-dom',
'javelin-magical-init',
'javelin-vector',
'javelin-request',
'javelin-util',
),
'9d9685d6' => array(
'phui-oi-list-view-css',
),
'9f36c42d' => array(
'javelin-behavior',
'javelin-stratcom',
'javelin-dom',
'javelin-vector',
),
'a0b57eb8' => array(
'javelin-behavior',
'javelin-dom',
'javelin-stratcom',
'javelin-workflow',
'javelin-util',
'phabricator-keyboard-shortcut',
),
'a3714c76' => array(
'javelin-behavior',
'javelin-stratcom',
'javelin-dom',
'javelin-vector',
'javelin-install',
),
'a3a63478' => array(
'phui-workcard-view-css',
),
'a464fe03' => array(
'javelin-behavior',
'javelin-uri',
'phabricator-notification',
),
'a6b98425' => array(
'javelin-behavior',
'javelin-dom',
'phortune-credit-card-form',
),
'a6f7a73b' => array(
'javelin-behavior',
'javelin-stratcom',
'javelin-dom',
),
'a80d0378' => array(
'javelin-behavior',
'javelin-stratcom',
'javelin-dom',
),
'a8beebea' => array(
'phui-oi-list-view-css',
),
'a8d8459d' => array(
'javelin-behavior',
'javelin-dom',
'javelin-stratcom',
),
'a8da01f0' => array(
'javelin-behavior',
'javelin-uri',
'phabricator-keyboard-shortcut',
),
'a9f88de2' => array(
'javelin-behavior',
'javelin-dom',
'javelin-stratcom',
'javelin-workflow',
'javelin-fx',
'javelin-util',
),
When logged-out users hit a "Login Required" dialog, try to choose a better "next" URI Summary: Ref T10004. After a user logs in, we send them to the "next" URI cookie if there is one, but currently don't always do a very good job of selecting a "next" URI, especially if they tried to do something with a dialog before being asked to log in. In particular, if a logged-out user clicks an action like "Edit Blocking Tasks" on a Maniphest task, the default behavior is to send them to the standalone page for that dialog after they log in. This can be pretty confusing. See T2691 and D6416 for earlier efforts here. At that time, we added a mechanism to //manually// override the default behavior, and fixed the most common links. This worked, but I'd like to fix the //default// beahvior so we don't need to remember to `setObjectURI()` correctly all over the place. ApplicationEditor has also introduced new cases which are more difficult to get right. While we could get them right by using the override and being careful about things, this also motivates fixing the default behavior. Finally, we have better tools for fixing the default behavior now than we did in 2013. Instead of using manual overrides, have JS include an "X-Phabricator-Via" header in Ajax requests. This is basically like a referrer header, and will contain the page the user's browser is on. In essentially every case, this should be a very good place (and often the best place) to send them after login. For all pages currently using `setObjectURI()`, it should produce the same behavior by default. I'll remove the `setObjectURI()` mechanism in the next diff. Test Plan: Clicked various workflow actions while logged out, saw "next" get set to a reasonable value, was redirected to a sensible, non-confusing page after login (the page with whatever button I clicked on it). Reviewers: chad Reviewed By: chad Maniphest Tasks: T10004 Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D14804
2015-12-17 15:10:04 +01:00
'ab2f381b' => array(
'javelin-request',
'javelin-behavior',
'javelin-dom',
'javelin-router',
'javelin-util',
'phabricator-busy',
),
'ab9e0a82' => array(
'javelin-install',
'javelin-util',
'javelin-dom',
'javelin-typeahead-normalizer',
),
2017-04-26 17:49:53 +02:00
'acd29eee' => array(
'javelin-behavior',
'javelin-stratcom',
'javelin-dom',
'phabricator-phtize',
'phabricator-textareautils',
'javelin-workflow',
'javelin-vector',
'phuix-autocomplete',
'javelin-mask',
),
'ad54037e' => array(
'javelin-behavior',
'javelin-dom',
'javelin-stratcom',
'javelin-util',
),
'b003d4fb' => array(
'javelin-behavior',
'javelin-stratcom',
'javelin-dom',
'phuix-dropdown-menu',
),
'b0b8f86d' => array(
'javelin-behavior',
'javelin-dom',
'javelin-stratcom',
),
'b23b49e6' => array(
'javelin-behavior',
'javelin-dom',
'javelin-util',
'javelin-request',
'phabricator-shaped-request',
),
'b2b4fbaf' => array(
'javelin-behavior',
'javelin-dom',
'javelin-uri',
'javelin-request',
),
'b3a4b884' => array(
'javelin-behavior',
'phabricator-prefab',
),
'b3e7d692' => array(
'javelin-install',
Provide a global router for Ajax requests Summary: Fixes T430. Fixes T4834. Obsoletes D7641. Currently, we do some things less-well than we could: - We just let the browser queue and prioritize requests, so if you load a revision with 50 changes and then click "Award Token", the action blocks until the changes load in most/all browsers. It would be better to prioritize this action and queue it immediately. - Similarly, changes tend to load in order, even if the user has clicked to a specific file. When the user expresses a preference for a specific file, we should prioritize it. - We show a spinning GIF when waiting on requests. This is appropriate for some types of reuqests, but distracting for others. To fix this: - Queue all (or, at least, most) requests into a new queue in JX.Router. - JX.Router handles prioritizing the requests. Principally: - You can submit a request with a specific priority (500 = general content loading, 1000 = default, 2000 = explicit user action) and JX.Router will get the higher stuff fired off sooner. - You can name requests and then adjust their prorities later, if the user expresses an interest in specific results. - Only use the spinner gif for "workflow" requests, which is bascially when the user clicked something and we're waiting on the server. I think it's useful and not-annoying in this case. - Don't show any status for draft requests. - For content requests, show a subtle hipster-style top loading bar. Test Plan: - Viewed a diff with 93 changes, and clicked award token. - Prior to this patch, the action took many many seconds to resolve. - After this patch, it resolves quickly. - Viewed a diff with 93 changes and saw a pleasant subtle hipster-style loading bar. - Viewed a diff with 93 changes and typed some draft text. Previews populated fairly quickly and there was no spinner. - Viewed a diff with 93 changes and clicked something with workflow, saw a spinner after a moment. - Viewed a diff with 93 changes and clicked a file in the table of contents near the end of the list. - Prior to this patch, it took a long time to show up. - After this patch, it loads directly. Reviewers: chad, btrahan Reviewed By: btrahan Subscribers: epriestley Maniphest Tasks: T430, T4834 Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D8979
2014-05-05 19:57:42 +02:00
),
'b49b59d6' => array(
'javelin-dom',
'javelin-util',
'javelin-stratcom',
'javelin-install',
'javelin-workflow',
'javelin-router',
'javelin-behavior-device',
'javelin-vector',
'phabricator-diff-inline',
),
'b59e1e96' => array(
'javelin-behavior',
'javelin-stratcom',
'javelin-workflow',
'javelin-dom',
'phabricator-draggable-list',
),
'b5c256b8' => array(
'javelin-install',
'javelin-dom',
),
'b5d57730' => array(
'javelin-install',
'javelin-stratcom',
'javelin-dom',
'javelin-util',
),
'b6993408' => array(
'javelin-behavior',
'javelin-stratcom',
'javelin-dom',
'javelin-json',
'phabricator-draggable-list',
),
'b95d6f7d' => array(
'javelin-behavior',
'javelin-stratcom',
'javelin-dom',
'phuix-dropdown-menu',
),
'ba158207' => array(
'javelin-behavior',
'javelin-uri',
'phabricator-notification',
),
'bb6e5c16' => array(
'javelin-dom',
'javelin-util',
'javelin-stratcom',
'javelin-install',
),
'bcaccd64' => array(
'javelin-behavior',
'javelin-behavior-device',
'javelin-stratcom',
'javelin-vector',
'phui-hovercard',
),
'bdaf4d04' => array(
'javelin-behavior',
'javelin-dom',
'javelin-util',
'javelin-request',
),
'bea6e7f4' => array(
'javelin-install',
'javelin-dom',
'javelin-stratcom',
'javelin-util',
'javelin-vector',
'javelin-magical-init',
),
'bee502c8' => array(
'javelin-behavior',
'javelin-stratcom',
'javelin-dom',
'javelin-workflow',
'javelin-quicksand',
'phabricator-phtize',
'phabricator-drag-and-drop-file-upload',
'phabricator-draggable-list',
),
'bf5374ef' => array(
'javelin-behavior',
'javelin-stratcom',
'javelin-dom',
),
'bff6884b' => array(
'javelin-install',
'javelin-dom',
),
'c19dd9b9' => array(
'javelin-install',
'javelin-util',
'javelin-stratcom',
'javelin-dom',
'javelin-vector',
),
'c3e917d9' => array(
'javelin-behavior',
'javelin-typeahead-ondemand-source',
'javelin-typeahead',
'javelin-dom',
'javelin-uri',
'javelin-util',
'javelin-stratcom',
'phabricator-prefab',
'phuix-icon-view',
),
'c420b0b9' => array(
'javelin-behavior',
'javelin-behavior-device',
'javelin-stratcom',
'phabricator-tooltip',
),
'c587b80f' => array(
'javelin-install',
),
'c7ccd872' => array(
'phui-fontkit-css',
),
'c90a04fc' => array(
'javelin-dom',
'javelin-dynval',
'javelin-reactor',
'javelin-reactornode',
'javelin-install',
'javelin-util',
),
'c96502cf' => array(
'multirow-row-manager',
'javelin-install',
'path-typeahead',
'javelin-dom',
'javelin-util',
'phabricator-prefab',
'phuix-form-control-view',
),
When logged-out users hit a "Login Required" dialog, try to choose a better "next" URI Summary: Ref T10004. After a user logs in, we send them to the "next" URI cookie if there is one, but currently don't always do a very good job of selecting a "next" URI, especially if they tried to do something with a dialog before being asked to log in. In particular, if a logged-out user clicks an action like "Edit Blocking Tasks" on a Maniphest task, the default behavior is to send them to the standalone page for that dialog after they log in. This can be pretty confusing. See T2691 and D6416 for earlier efforts here. At that time, we added a mechanism to //manually// override the default behavior, and fixed the most common links. This worked, but I'd like to fix the //default// beahvior so we don't need to remember to `setObjectURI()` correctly all over the place. ApplicationEditor has also introduced new cases which are more difficult to get right. While we could get them right by using the override and being careful about things, this also motivates fixing the default behavior. Finally, we have better tools for fixing the default behavior now than we did in 2013. Instead of using manual overrides, have JS include an "X-Phabricator-Via" header in Ajax requests. This is basically like a referrer header, and will contain the page the user's browser is on. In essentially every case, this should be a very good place (and often the best place) to send them after login. For all pages currently using `setObjectURI()`, it should produce the same behavior by default. I'll remove the `setObjectURI()` mechanism in the next diff. Test Plan: Clicked various workflow actions while logged out, saw "next" get set to a reasonable value, was redirected to a sensible, non-confusing page after login (the page with whatever button I clicked on it). Reviewers: chad Reviewed By: chad Maniphest Tasks: T10004 Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D14804
2015-12-17 15:10:04 +01:00
'c989ade3' => array(
'javelin-install',
'javelin-util',
'javelin-stratcom',
),
'caade6f2' => array(
'javelin-behavior',
'javelin-request',
'javelin-stratcom',
'javelin-vector',
'javelin-dom',
'javelin-uri',
'javelin-behavior-device',
'phabricator-title',
'phabricator-favicon',
),
'cd2b9b77' => array(
'phui-oi-list-view-css',
),
'd057e45a' => array(
'javelin-behavior',
'javelin-dom',
'javelin-stratcom',
'javelin-workflow',
'javelin-util',
'phabricator-notification',
'conpherence-thread-manager',
),
'd0c516d5' => array(
'javelin-behavior',
'javelin-dom',
'javelin-util',
'phuix-dropdown-menu',
'phuix-action-list-view',
'phuix-action-view',
'javelin-workflow',
'phuix-icon-view',
),
'd254d646' => array(
'javelin-util',
),
'd4505101' => array(
'javelin-stratcom',
'javelin-install',
'javelin-uri',
'javelin-util',
),
'd4eecc63' => array(
'javelin-behavior',
'javelin-dom',
'javelin-stratcom',
),
'd7a74243' => array(
'javelin-behavior',
'javelin-stratcom',
'javelin-workflow',
'javelin-dom',
'phabricator-draggable-list',
),
'd835b03a' => array(
'javelin-behavior',
'javelin-dom',
'javelin-util',
'phabricator-shaped-request',
),
Pass timeline view data to comment previews, restoring Differential comment previews Summary: Ref T13222. In D19918, I refactored how timelines get "view data". Today, this is always additional data about which images/changesets/diffs are visible on the current revision/commit/mock, so we can tell if inline comments should be linked to a `#anchor` on the same page (if the inline is rendered there somewhere) or to a `/D123?id=1&vs=2` full link on a different page (if it isn't), but in general this could be any sort of state information about the current page that affects how the timeline should render. Previously, comment previews did not use any specialized object code and always rendered a "generic" timeline story. This was actually a bug, but none of the code we have today cares about this (since it's all inline related, and inlines render separately) so it never impacted anything. After the `TimelineEngine` change, the preview renders with Differential-specific code. This is more correct, but we were not passing the preview the "view data" so it broke. This preview doesn't actually need the view data and we could just make it bail out if it isn't present, but pass it through for consistency and so this works like we'd expect if we do something fancier with view data in the future. Test Plan: Viewed comment and inline comment previews in Differential, saw old behavior restored. Reviewers: amckinley Reviewed By: amckinley Maniphest Tasks: T13222 Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D19943
2019-01-03 01:48:53 +01:00
'd848ec84' => array(
'javelin-behavior',
'javelin-stratcom',
'javelin-workflow',
'javelin-dom',
'phuix-form-control-view',
'phuix-icon-view',
'javelin-behavior-phabricator-gesture',
),
'db34a142' => array(
'phui-inline-comment-view-css',
),
'dca75c0e' => array(
'multirow-row-manager',
'javelin-install',
'javelin-util',
'javelin-dom',
'javelin-stratcom',
'javelin-json',
'phabricator-prefab',
),
'de2e896f' => array(
'javelin-behavior',
'javelin-dom',
'javelin-typeahead',
'javelin-typeahead-ondemand-source',
'javelin-dom',
),
'df1bbd34' => array(
'javelin-install',
'javelin-dom',
'phuix-icon-view',
'phabricator-prefab',
),
'e1d25dfb' => array(
'javelin-behavior',
'javelin-stratcom',
'javelin-workflow',
'javelin-dom',
'phabricator-draggable-list',
),
Fix several duplication/replay behaviors in Aphlict Summary: Ref T12566. Ref T12563. This fixes three bugs with Aphlict replay stuff: First, Conphernece would try to repaint the UI even if no thread was open. Only repaint when a thread is open. Second, although we deduplicate JX.Leader messages, we didn't deduplicate actual notification messages. If you browsed the leader window, then it re-elected itelf as a leader and replayed history, it could rebroadcast notifications and other windows could show doubles. Deduplicate notifications to prevent this. Third, we always replayed the last 60 seconds of history. When you browsed the leader window, whichever window became the new leader (possibly the one you just browsed) could replay messages from before it had opened, leading to duplicate messages. Particularly, after receiving a message and then browsing you could see that message again. Instead, only replay history as far back as when the window first opened. Test Plan: - Clicked "Repaint" with a thread open, saw a repaint. Clicked "Repaint" with Conpherence open but no thread, no repaint and no 404 request to `/update/null/`. - In browser A, opened three windows. In browser B, sent a notification. In browser A, browsed the leader window away twice in a row. Observed that the window which never became a leader doesn't duplicate notifications. - In browser A, opened three windows. In browser B, sent a notification. In browser A, browsed the leader window away over and over again. Observed that replay requests issued with appropriate history windows. Reviewers: chad Reviewed By: chad Maniphest Tasks: T12566, T12563 Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D17722
2017-04-18 20:14:37 +02:00
'e1d4b11a' => array(
'javelin-install',
'javelin-util',
'javelin-websocket',
'javelin-leader',
'javelin-json',
),
'e1ff79b1' => array(
'javelin-behavior',
'javelin-stratcom',
'javelin-dom',
),
'e2e0a072' => array(
'javelin-behavior',
'javelin-stratcom',
'javelin-workflow',
'javelin-dom',
'phabricator-draggable-list',
),
'e379b58e' => array(
'javelin-behavior',
'javelin-stratcom',
'javelin-vector',
'javelin-dom',
'javelin-uri',
),
'e4232876' => array(
'javelin-behavior',
'javelin-dom',
'javelin-vector',
'phui-chart-css',
),
'e4cc26b3' => array(
'javelin-behavior',
'javelin-dom',
),
'e83d28f3' => array(
'javelin-dom',
),
'e9581f08' => array(
'javelin-behavior',
'javelin-stratcom',
'javelin-workflow',
'javelin-dom',
'phabricator-draggable-list',
),
'e9c95dd4' => array(
'syntax-default-css',
),
'ec1f3669' => array(
'javelin-behavior',
'javelin-util',
'javelin-stratcom',
'javelin-dom',
'javelin-vector',
'javelin-magical-init',
'javelin-request',
'javelin-history',
'javelin-workflow',
'javelin-mask',
'javelin-behavior-device',
'phabricator-keyboard-shortcut',
),
'ecf4e799' => array(
'javelin-behavior',
'javelin-util',
'javelin-dom',
'javelin-stratcom',
'javelin-vector',
),
2015-06-23 22:43:47 +02:00
'edf8a145' => array(
'javelin-behavior',
'javelin-uri',
),
'ef7e057f' => array(
'javelin-install',
),
'efe49472' => array(
'javelin-install',
'javelin-util',
),
'f01586dc' => array(
'javelin-behavior',
'javelin-dom',
'javelin-util',
'javelin-workflow',
'javelin-json',
),
'f0eb6708' => array(
'javelin-behavior',
'javelin-dom',
'javelin-stratcom',
'phabricator-tooltip',
'phabricator-diff-changeset-list',
'phabricator-diff-changeset',
),
'f1ff5494' => array(
'phui-button-css',
'phui-button-simple-css',
),
'f50152ad' => array(
'phui-timeline-view-css',
),
'f6555212' => array(
'javelin-install',
'javelin-reactornode',
'javelin-util',
'javelin-reactor',
),
'f829edb3' => array(
'javelin-view',
'javelin-install',
'javelin-dom',
),
'fc91ab6c' => array(
'javelin-behavior',
'javelin-dom',
'phortune-credit-card-form',
),
'fe287620' => array(
'javelin-install',
'javelin-dom',
'javelin-view-visitor',
'javelin-util',
),
),
'packages' => array(
'conpherence.pkg.css' => array(
'conpherence-durable-column-view',
'conpherence-menu-css',
'conpherence-color-css',
'conpherence-message-pane-css',
'conpherence-notification-css',
'conpherence-transaction-css',
'conpherence-participant-pane-css',
'conpherence-header-pane-css',
),
'conpherence.pkg.js' => array(
'javelin-behavior-conpherence-menu',
'javelin-behavior-conpherence-participant-pane',
'javelin-behavior-conpherence-pontificate',
'javelin-behavior-toggle-widget',
),
'core.pkg.css' => array(
'phabricator-core-css',
'phabricator-zindex-css',
'phui-button-css',
'phui-button-simple-css',
'phui-theme-css',
'phabricator-standard-page-view',
'aphront-dialog-view-css',
'phui-form-view-css',
'aphront-panel-view-css',
'aphront-table-view-css',
'aphront-tokenizer-control-css',
'aphront-typeahead-control-css',
'aphront-list-filter-view-css',
'application-search-view-css',
'phabricator-remarkup-css',
'syntax-highlighting-css',
'syntax-default-css',
'phui-pager-css',
'aphront-tooltip-css',
'phabricator-flag-css',
'phui-info-view-css',
'phabricator-main-menu-view',
'phabricator-notification-css',
'phabricator-notification-menu-css',
'phui-lightbox-css',
'phui-comment-panel-css',
'phui-header-view-css',
'phabricator-nav-view-css',
'phui-basic-nav-view-css',
'phui-crumbs-view-css',
'phui-oi-list-view-css',
'phui-oi-color-css',
'phui-oi-big-ui-css',
'phui-oi-drag-ui-css',
'phui-oi-simple-ui-css',
'phui-oi-flush-ui-css',
'global-drag-and-drop-css',
'phui-spacing-css',
'phui-form-css',
'phui-icon-view-css',
'phabricator-action-list-view-css',
'phui-property-list-view-css',
'phui-tag-view-css',
'phui-list-view-css',
'font-fontawesome',
'font-lato',
'phui-font-icon-base-css',
'phui-fontkit-css',
'phui-box-css',
'phui-object-box-css',
'phui-timeline-view-css',
'phui-two-column-view-css',
'phui-curtain-view-css',
'sprite-login-css',
'sprite-tokens-css',
'tokens-css',
'auth-css',
'phui-status-list-view-css',
'phui-feed-story-css',
'phabricator-feed-css',
'phabricator-dashboard-css',
'aphront-multi-column-view-css',
),
'core.pkg.js' => array(
'javelin-util',
'javelin-install',
'javelin-event',
'javelin-stratcom',
'javelin-behavior',
'javelin-resource',
'javelin-request',
'javelin-vector',
'javelin-dom',
'javelin-json',
'javelin-uri',
'javelin-workflow',
'javelin-mask',
'javelin-typeahead',
'javelin-typeahead-normalizer',
'javelin-typeahead-source',
'javelin-typeahead-preloaded-source',
'javelin-typeahead-ondemand-source',
'javelin-tokenizer',
'javelin-history',
'javelin-router',
'javelin-routable',
'javelin-behavior-aphront-basic-tokenizer',
'javelin-behavior-workflow',
'javelin-behavior-aphront-form-disable-on-submit',
'phabricator-keyboard-shortcut-manager',
'phabricator-keyboard-shortcut',
'javelin-behavior-phabricator-keyboard-shortcuts',
'javelin-behavior-refresh-csrf',
'javelin-behavior-phabricator-watch-anchor',
'javelin-behavior-phabricator-autofocus',
'phuix-dropdown-menu',
'phuix-action-list-view',
'phuix-action-view',
'phuix-icon-view',
'phabricator-phtize',
'javelin-behavior-phabricator-oncopy',
'phabricator-tooltip',
'javelin-behavior-phabricator-tooltips',
'phabricator-prefab',
'javelin-behavior-device',
'javelin-behavior-toggle-class',
'javelin-behavior-lightbox-attachments',
'phabricator-busy',
'javelin-sound',
'javelin-aphlict',
'phabricator-notification',
'javelin-behavior-aphlict-listen',
'javelin-behavior-phabricator-search-typeahead',
'javelin-behavior-aphlict-dropdown',
'javelin-behavior-history-install',
'javelin-behavior-phabricator-gesture',
'javelin-behavior-phabricator-active-nav',
'javelin-behavior-phabricator-nav',
'javelin-behavior-phabricator-remarkup-assist',
'phabricator-textareautils',
'phabricator-file-upload',
'javelin-behavior-global-drag-and-drop',
'javelin-behavior-phabricator-reveal-content',
'phui-hovercard',
'javelin-behavior-phui-hovercards',
'javelin-color',
'javelin-fx',
'phabricator-draggable-list',
'javelin-behavior-phabricator-transaction-list',
'javelin-behavior-phabricator-show-older-transactions',
'javelin-behavior-phui-dropdown-menu',
'javelin-behavior-doorkeeper-tag',
'phabricator-title',
'javelin-leader',
'javelin-websocket',
'javelin-behavior-dashboard-async-panel',
'javelin-behavior-dashboard-tab-panel',
'javelin-quicksand',
'javelin-behavior-quicksand-blacklist',
'javelin-behavior-high-security-warning',
'javelin-behavior-read-only-warning',
'javelin-scrollbar',
'javelin-behavior-scrollbar',
'javelin-behavior-durable-column',
'conpherence-thread-manager',
2016-05-21 22:27:56 +02:00
'javelin-behavior-detect-timezone',
'javelin-behavior-setup-check-https',
'javelin-behavior-aphlict-status',
'javelin-behavior-user-menu',
'phabricator-favicon',
),
'differential.pkg.css' => array(
'differential-core-view-css',
'differential-changeset-view-css',
'differential-revision-history-css',
'differential-revision-list-css',
'differential-table-of-contents-css',
'differential-revision-comment-css',
'differential-revision-add-comment-css',
'phabricator-object-selector-css',
'phabricator-content-source-view-css',
'inline-comment-summary-css',
'phui-inline-comment-view-css',
'phabricator-filetree-view-css',
),
'differential.pkg.js' => array(
'phabricator-drag-and-drop-file-upload',
'phabricator-shaped-request',
'javelin-behavior-differential-populate',
'javelin-behavior-differential-diff-radios',
'javelin-behavior-aphront-drag-and-drop-textarea',
'javelin-behavior-phabricator-object-selector',
'javelin-behavior-repository-crossreference',
'javelin-behavior-differential-user-select',
'javelin-behavior-aphront-more',
'phabricator-diff-inline',
'phabricator-diff-changeset',
'phabricator-diff-changeset-list',
),
'diffusion.pkg.css' => array(
'diffusion-icons-css',
),
'diffusion.pkg.js' => array(
'javelin-behavior-diffusion-pull-lastmodified',
'javelin-behavior-diffusion-commit-graph',
'javelin-behavior-audit-preview',
),
'maniphest.pkg.css' => array(
'maniphest-task-summary-css',
),
'maniphest.pkg.js' => array(
'javelin-behavior-maniphest-batch-selector',
'javelin-behavior-maniphest-subpriority-editor',
'javelin-behavior-maniphest-list-editor',
),
),
);