Summary: this section gets updated for each and every request. clicking a given entry updates the larger dark-console area to have the information from that request
Test Plan: clicked around in maniphest and observed request log populating correctly. clicked a few entries in request log and saw it updated properly. clicked a different tab in the dark-console and it worked. clicked a different request log entry and it opened the dark console to the proper request on the proper tab.
Reviewers: epriestley, vrana
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: aran, Koolvin
Maniphest Tasks: T1136
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D2574
Summary:
- Move email to a separate table.
- Migrate existing email to new storage.
- Allow users to add and remove email addresses.
- Allow users to verify email addresses.
- Allow users to change their primary email address.
- Convert all the registration/reset/login code to understand these changes.
- There are a few security considerations here but I think I've addressed them. Principally, it is important to never let a user acquire a verified email address they don't actually own. We ensure this by tightening the scoping of token generation rules to be (user, email) specific.
- This should have essentially zero impact on Facebook, but may require some minor changes in the registration code -- I don't exactly remember how it is set up.
Not included here (next steps):
- Allow configuration to restrict email to certain domains.
- Allow configuration to require validated email.
Test Plan:
This is a fairly extensive, difficult-to-test change.
- From "Email Addresses" interface:
- Added new email (verified email verifications sent).
- Changed primary email (verified old/new notificactions sent).
- Resent verification emails (verified they sent).
- Removed email.
- Tried to add already-owned email.
- Created new users with "accountadmin". Edited existing users with "accountadmin".
- Created new users with "add_user.php".
- Created new users with web interface.
- Clicked welcome email link, verified it verified email.
- Reset password.
- Linked/unlinked oauth accounts.
- Logged in with oauth account.
- Logged in with email.
- Registered with Oauth account.
- Tried to register with OAuth account with duplicate email.
- Verified errors for email verification with bad tokens, etc.
Reviewers: btrahan, vrana, jungejason
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T1184
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D2393
Summary:
- When a user uploads an oversized file, throw an exception.
- When an uncaught exception occurs during a Conduit request, return a Conduit response.
- When an uncaught exception occurs during a non-workflow Ajax request, return an Ajax response.
Test Plan:
- Uploaded overlarge files.
- Hit an exception page with ?__ajax__=1 and ?__conduit__=1
Reviewers: btrahan, vrana, jungejason
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T875, T788
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D2385
Summary: No big surprises here, delted the unused "DarkConsole" class.
Test Plan: Ran 'testEverythingImplemented' to verify I wasn't finalizing anything we extend.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran, epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T795
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D1876
Summary:
This diff makes the OAuthServer more compliant with the spec by
- making it return well-formatted error codes with error types from the spec.
- making it respect the "state" variable, which is a transparent variable the
client passes and the server passes back
- making it be super, duper compliant with respect to redirect uris
-- if specified in authorization step, check if its valid relative to the client
registered URI and if so save it
-- if specified in authorization step, check if its been specified in the access
step and error if it doesn't match or doesn't exist
-- note we don't make any use of it in the access step which seems strange but
hey, that's what the spec says!
This diff makes the OAuthServer suck less by
- making the "cancel" button do something in the user authorization flow
- making the client list view and client edit view be a bit more usable around
client secrets
- fixing a few bugs I managed to introduce along the way
Test Plan:
- create a test phabricator client, updated my conf, and then linked and
unlinked phabricator to itself
- wrote some tests for PhabricatorOAuthServer -- they pass!
-- these validate the various validate URI checks
- tried a few important authorization calls
--
http://phabricator.dev/oauthserver/auth/?client_id=X&state=test&redirect_uri=http://www.evil.com
--- verified error'd from mismatching redirect uri's
--- verified state parameter in response
--- verified did not redirect to client redirect uri
-- http://phabricator.dev/oauthserver/auth/?client_id=X w/ existing
authorization
--- got redirected to proper client url with error that response_type not
specified
-- http://phabricator.dev/oauthserver/auth/?client_id=X&response_type=code w/
existing authorization
--- got redirected to proper client url with pertinent code!
- tried a few important access calls
-- verified appropriate errors if missing any required parameters
-- verified good access code with appropriate other variables resulted in an
access token
- verified that if redirect_uri set correctly in authorization required for
access and errors if differs at all / only succeeds if exactly the same
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: aran, epriestley, ajtrichards
Maniphest Tasks: T889, T906, T897
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D1727
Summary:
beyond the title, this diff tweaks the test console to have a bit more
functionality. also makes a small change to CSS for AphrontFormControlMarkup,
which IMO fixes a display issue on
https://secure.phabricator.com/settings/page/profile/ where the Profile URI is
all up in the air and whatnot
I think this is missing pagination. I am getting tired of the size though and
will add later. See T905.
Test Plan:
viewed, updated and deleted client authorizations. viewed, created,
updated and deleted clients
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: aran, epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T849, T850, T848
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D1683
Summary: D1595 split encodeJSONForHTTPResponse() into two methods, but left a
straggling $use_javelin_shield parameter which is no longer used.
Test Plan: Caught errors in error log.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran, epriestley
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D1663
Summary:
adds a Phabricator OAuth server, which has three big commands:
- auth - allows $user to authorize a given client or application. if $user has already authorized, it hands an authoization code back to $redirect_uri
- token - given a valid authorization code, this command returns an authorization token
- whoami - Conduit.whoami, all nice and purdy relative to the oauth server.
Also has a "test" handler, which I used to create some test data. T850 will
delete this as it adds the ability to create this data in the Phabricator
product.
This diff also adds the corresponding client in Phabricator for the Phabricator
OAuth Server. (Note that clients are known as "providers" in the Phabricator
codebase but client makes more sense relative to the server nomenclature)
Also, related to make this work well
- clean up the diagnostics page by variabilizing the provider-specific
information and extending the provider classes as appropriate.
- augment Conduit.whoami for more full-featured OAuth support, at least where
the Phabricator client is concerned
What's missing here... See T844, T848, T849, T850, and T852.
Test Plan:
- created a dummy client via the test handler. setup development.conf to have
have proper variables for this dummy client. went through authorization and
de-authorization flows
- viewed the diagnostics page for all known oauth providers and saw
provider-specific debugging information
Reviewers: epriestley
CC: aran, epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T44, T797
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D1595
Summary:
Some browsers will still sniff content types even with "Content-Type" and
"X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff". Encode "<" and ">" to prevent them from
sniffing the content as HTML.
See T865.
Also unified some of the code on this pathway.
Test Plan: Verified Opera no longer sniffs the Conduit response into HTML for
the test case in T865. Unit tests pass.
Reviewers: cbg, btrahan
Reviewed By: cbg
CC: aran, epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T139, T865
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D1606
Summary:
We currently allow you to assign code review to disabled users, but
should not.
Test Plan:
- Created revisions with no reviewers and only disabled reviewers, was
appropriately warned.
- Looked at a disabled user handle link, was clearly informed.
- Tried to create a new revision with a disabled reviewer, was rebuffed.
Reviewers: btrahan, jungejason
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D1429
Summary:
A few people in IRC have been having issues here recently. If you misconfigure
the IRC bot, e.g., you get a 200 response back with a bunch of login HTML in it.
This is unhelpful.
Try to detect that a conduit request is going to the wrong path and raise a
concise, explicit error which is comprehensible from the CLI.
Also created a "PlainText" response and moved the IE nosniff header to the base
response object.
Test Plan: As a logged-out user, hit various nonsense with "?__conduit__=true"
in the URI. Got good error messages. Hit nonsense without it, got login screens.
Reviewers: btrahan, jungejason
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T775
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D1407
Summary: I've also moved the response generation for 404 from
##AphrontDefaultApplicationConfiguration## to ##buildResponseString()##
Test Plan:
Visit /
Visit /mail/
Visit /x/
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: aran, epriestley, vrana
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D1406
Summary:
we use to only add X-Frame-Options for AphrontWebpageResponse.
There some security concern about it. Example of a drag-drop attack:
http://sites.google.com/site/tentacoloviola/. The fix is to add it to
all AphrontResponse.
Test Plan:
View page which disalble this option still works (like the
xhpast tree page); verify that the AphrontAjaxResponse contains the
X-Frame-Options in the header.
Reviewers: epriestley, benmathews
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: nh, aran, jungejason, epriestley
Differential Revision: 926
Summary:
You can currently attach tasks to revisions from Differential, but not revisions
to tasks from Maniphest. Allow editing from either side.
This logic is kind of tricky but the alternative was massive code duplication.
Test Plan:
Added and removed revisions from maniphest. Added and removed tasks from
differential.
This should have no impact on the Facebook install since none of this is used
there.
Reviewed By: aran
Reviewers: tomo, tuomaspelkonen, jungejason, aran
CC: aran, epriestley
Differential Revision: 288
Summary:
Sending a response body in a 304 triggers some crazy broken behavior in Safari +
Apache that I never hit during testing. Be spec-compliant.
Test Plan:
Mashed reload a bunch on a .php page with Safari + Apache against localhost.
Reviewed By: tuomaspelkonen
Reviewers: tuomaspelkonen, jungejason, aran, rm
CC: aran, tuomaspelkonen
Differential Revision: 261
Summary:
We always return HTTP 200 right now and don't send a "Last-Modified" header, so
browsers download more data then necessary if you sit on a page mashing reload
(for example).
Test Plan:
Used Charles to verify HTTP response codes from 400, 404 and 304 responses.
Mashed reload a bunch and saw that the server sent back 304s.
Changed the resource hash seed and saw 200s, then 304s on reload.
Reviewed By: tuomaspelkonen
Reviewers: tuomaspelkonen, jungejason, aran
CC: bmaurer, aran, tuomaspelkonen
Differential Revision: 253
Summary:
Technically we didn't have it in the first place, but should. Also
add in X-Frame-Options for double-plus-good.
Test Plan:
Created a page with Phabricator in an <iframe />, got busted out
of it. Added in the X-Frame-Options, got an empty iframe.
Differential Revision: 38
Reviewed By: tomo
Reviewers: mroch, tomo
