Summary:
Ref T5861. Currently, mail tags are hard-coded; move them into applications. Each Editor defines its own tags.
This has zero impact on the UI or behavior.
Test Plan:
- Checked/unchecked some options, saved form.
- Swapped back to `master` and saw exactly the same values.
Reviewers: chad, btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T5861
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10238
Summary: Ref T5861. Adds an option to opt out of all notification email. We'll still send you password resets, email verifications, etc.
Test Plan:
{F189484}
- Added unit tests.
- With preference set to different things, tried to send myself mail. Mail respected preferences.
- Sent password reset email, which got through the preference.
Reviewers: btrahan, chad
Reviewed By: chad
Subscribers: rush898, epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T5861
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10237
Summary: This slipped through the datasource modernization stuff.
Test Plan: Used search UI.
Reviewers: rush898, btrahan, chad
Reviewed By: chad
Subscribers: epriestley
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10196
Summary: Fixes T5739. I only got D9857 half right: the new method names are correct, but the bodies needed to change too.
Test Plan: Signed a document as an anonymous user.
Reviewers: btrahan, chad
Reviewed By: chad
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T5739
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10191
Summary: Instead of implementing the `getCapabilityKey` method in all subclasses of `PhabricatorPolicyCapability`, provide a `final` implementation in the base class which uses reflection. See D9837 and D9985 for similar implementations.
Test Plan: N/A
Reviewers: epriestley, #blessed_reviewers
Reviewed By: epriestley, #blessed_reviewers
Subscribers: epriestley, Korvin, hach-que
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10039
Summary: Ref T5655. Rename `PhabricatorPHIDType` subclasses for clarity (see discussion in D9839). I'm not too keen on some of the resulting class names, so feel free to suggest alternatives.
Test Plan: Ran unit tests.
Reviewers: epriestley, #blessed_reviewers
Reviewed By: epriestley, #blessed_reviewers
Subscribers: epriestley, Korvin, hach-que
Maniphest Tasks: T5655
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D9986
Summary: Provide an implementation for the `getName` method rather than automagically determining the application name.
Test Plan: Saw reasonable application names in the launcher.
Reviewers: #blessed_reviewers, epriestley
Reviewed By: #blessed_reviewers, epriestley
Subscribers: epriestley, Korvin
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10027
Summary: Ref T5655. Some discussion in D9839. Generally speaking, `Phabricator{$name}Application` is clearer than `PhabricatorApplication{$name}`.
Test Plan:
# Pinned and uninstalled some applications.
# Applied patch and performed migrations.
# Verified that the pinned applications were still pinned and that the uninstalled applications were still uninstalled.
# Performed a sanity check on the database contents.
Reviewers: btrahan, epriestley, #blessed_reviewers
Reviewed By: epriestley, #blessed_reviewers
Subscribers: hach-que, epriestley, Korvin
Maniphest Tasks: T5655
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D9982
Summary: Instead of implementing the `getTypeConstant` method in all subclasses of `PhabricatorPHIDType`, provide a `final` implementation in the base class which uses reflection. See D9837 for a similar implementation.
Test Plan: Ran `arc unit`.
Reviewers: #blessed_reviewers, epriestley
Reviewed By: #blessed_reviewers, epriestley
Subscribers: epriestley, Korvin, hach-que
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D9985
Summary: Ref T5655. The `PhabricatorDestructibleInterface` interface is misspelled as `PhabricatorDestructableInterface`. Fix the spelling mistake.
Test Plan: `grep`. Seeing as this interface is fairly recent, I don't expect that this would cause any widespread breakages.
Reviewers: epriestley, #blessed_reviewers
Reviewed By: epriestley, #blessed_reviewers
Subscribers: epriestley, Korvin
Maniphest Tasks: T5655
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D9988
Summary:
Ref T4420. If a datasource does not specify an icon explicitly, check if the PHID type has a default, and use that.
This leaves us with only Projects and some special stuff setting explicit icons, and reduces code duplication.
Test Plan: Used typeahead to find all affected object types.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T4420
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D9894
Summary:
Ref T5245. These were a bad idea.
We no longer need actors for edge edits either, so remove those. Generally, edges have fit into the policy model as pure/low-level infrastructure, and they do not have any policy or capability information in and of themselves.
Test Plan: `grep`
Reviewers: chad, btrahan, joshuaspence
Reviewed By: joshuaspence
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T5245
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D9840
Summary: I'm pretty sure that `@group` annotations are useless now... see D9855. Also fixed various other minor issues.
Test Plan: Eye-ball it.
Reviewers: #blessed_reviewers, epriestley, chad
Reviewed By: #blessed_reviewers, epriestley
Subscribers: epriestley, Korvin, hach-que
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D9859
Summary: This got written a while ago and is using slightly incorrect gating on logged-out users. The names of these methods should probably be more clear too, but basically "shouldAllowPublic()" is for "this page may be usable to logged-out users, if policies allow it", while "shouldRequireLogin()" is for "this page should skip various credential checks". One of the skipped checks is email verification. This method should maybe be something like "isAuthenticationRelatedOrNoncredentialPage()" but I don't have a good name for that.
Test Plan: Unverified users are now prompted to verify email when viewing a legalpad document, instead of allowed to sign it.
Reviewers: rush898, chad
Reviewed By: chad
Subscribers: epriestley
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D9857
Summary:
Fixes T5532. Allow documents to have a preamble in the header which can be used to explain who should sign a document and why.
Particularly, I plan to use this to navigate the corporate vs individual stuff more sensibly.
Test Plan: {F174228}
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T5532
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D9819
Summary:
Ref T5532. This adds:
- Documents can designate that they should be signed by "Corporations" or "Individuals".
- Corporate documents get different fields and a different exemption process.
- Basically everything works the same but this is like a zillion lines of form code.
Test Plan: See screenshots.
Reviewers: btrahan, chad
Reviewed By: chad
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T5532
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D9812
Summary:
Ref T5532. Allow document managers to add exemptions, which act like signatures but are tracked a little differently.
The primary use case for us is users who sign a corporate CLA and need a user-level exemption if they don't want to sign an individual CLA.
Test Plan: See screenshots.
Reviewers: btrahan, chad
Reviewed By: chad
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T5532
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D9795
Summary: Fixes T3116. This app is still pretty basic, but solves a real problem and doesn't have any major missing features.
Test Plan: Observed no "Beta" on launcher.
Reviewers: btrahan, chad
Reviewed By: chad
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T3116
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D9774
Summary: Ref T3116. Installs might reasonably want to restrict creation of these documents to actual lawyers or something.
Test Plan: Adjusted policy, tried to create document, set it back, created a document.
Reviewers: btrahan, chad
Reviewed By: chad
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T3116
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D9778
Summary: Ref T3116. Explain a couple of core use cases and contextualize the app a bit.
Test Plan: Read application help screen and user guide.
Reviewers: btrahan, chad
Reviewed By: chad
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T3116
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D9777
Summary:
Ref T3116. Add a Herald action "Require legal signatures" which requires revision authors to accept legal agreements before their revisions can be accepted.
- Herald will check which documents the author has signed, and trigger a "you have to sign X, Y, Z" for other documents.
- If the author has already signed everything, we don't spam the revision -- basically, this only triggers when signatures are missing.
- The UI will show which documents must be signed and warn that the revision can't be accepted until they're completed.
- Users aren't allowed to "Accept" the revision until documents are cleared.
Fixes T1157. The original install making the request (Hive) no longer uses Phabricator, and this satisfies our requirements.
Test Plan:
- Added a Herald rule.
- Created a revision, saw the rule trigger.
- Viewed as author and non-author, saw field UI (generic for non-author, specific for author), transaction UI, and accept-warning UI.
- Tried to accept revision.
- Signed document, saw UI update. Note that signatures don't currently //push// an update to the revision, but could eventually (like blocking tasks work).
- Accepted revision.
- Created another revision, saw rules not add the document (since it's already signed, this is the "no spam" case).
Reviewers: btrahan, chad
Reviewed By: chad
Subscribers: asherkin, epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T1157, T3116
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D9771
Summary:
Ref T3116. In the case of anonymous signers, there's no way to do a quick way to check if someone has signed a doc since you can't query by their (nonexistent) external account ID.
Move "name" and "email" to first-class columns and let the engine search for them.
Test Plan: Searched for signatures with name and email fragments.
Reviewers: btrahan, chad
Reviewed By: chad
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T3116
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D9776
Summary: Ref T3116. Support permanent destruction of legal document objects.
Test Plan: Ran `bin/remove destroy L1`, saw it clean up the document body, signatures, transactions and edges.
Reviewers: btrahan, chad
Reviewed By: chad
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T3116
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D9775
Summary: Ref T3116. If you have MFA on your account, require a code to sign a legal document.
Test Plan: Signed legal documents, got checkpointed.
Reviewers: btrahan, chad
Reviewed By: chad
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T3116
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D9772
Summary:
Ref T3116. You can already search for sigatures on a specific document, but allow them to be searched across documents too.
In particular, this lets users answer questions like "Which of these 5 documents has alincoln signed?" / "Has alincoln signed all the stuff I care about?" / "who has signed either L5 or equivalent document L22?", etc.
Test Plan: {F171658}
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T3116
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D9770
Summary:
Ref T3116. Allow documents to be queried for ones the viewer has signed, and make this the default view.
This also relaxes the versioning stuff a little bit, and stops invalidating signatures on older versions of documents. While I think we should do that eventually, it should be more explicit and have better coordination in the UI. For now, we'll track and show older signatures, but not invalidate them.
I imagine eventually differentiating between "minor edits" (typo / link fixes, for example) and major edits which actually require re-signature.
Test Plan: {F171650}
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T3116
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D9769
Summary: Ref T3116. Tweak the main Legalpad view a bit -- in particular, show signature status.
Test Plan: {F171641}
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T3116
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D9768
Summary:
Ref T3116. Since this UI was written we've moved away from footer icons and made tables work better on mobile. This seems reasonable to use a pure table for. I've also reduced the number of required fields here. Use a table and make this UI accessible.
The "Restricted External Account" stuff is T3732, which I'll tackle next.
Test Plan: {F171584}
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T3116
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D9766
Summary:
Ref T3116. Currently, document signatures are just in a big list that you can't search through.
- Make it easier to check if a specific user has signed.
- Restrict this UI to users who have edit permission on the document (roughly, you need to be a document manager to see the full signature list).
(It's currently possible to generate a Dashboard panel using this query, but it will just throw an exception. I'm going to leave it like that for now, we might reasonably expose some "view signatures across doucments" UI later so someone can quickly check if a user has signed 5 documents or something.)
Test Plan: {F171576}
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T3116
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D9765
Summary:
Ref T3116. Currently signatures are visible to anyone, but they should be more private than that. Instead, you can see a signature if:
- It's a signature on a document you can edit; or
- it's your signature.
I'm going to lock down the signatures page a bit in general, but this makes sure that the root policy is correct.
Test Plan:
- Signed a document.
- Viewed signatures of a document.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T3116
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D9764
Summary:
Generally reduces friction, standardizes, and simplifies this workflow. Particularly, this removes "address" and "phone", which I think we can wait for user demand for.
For logged-in users, we just always use their primary email.
Test Plan: See screenshots.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Subscribers: epriestley
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D9735
Summary: This makes it look a little less weird.
Test Plan: {F170217}
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Subscribers: epriestley
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D9734
Summary:
- Makes the "legal document" page the main page.
- Links to the "manage" page.
- The "manage" operation now requires CAN_EDIT.
- Modernize some crumbs and such.
Test Plan: {F170213}
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Subscribers: epriestley
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D9733
Summary:
Fixes T5424.
- One concrete issue: drafts were not being cleared properly because `__draft__` was not set on submission. This (mostly) fixes phantom drafts.
- This ajax comment magic feels weird and floaty and generally has problems. For example, if you add subscribers or inlines, all the stuff on the page which represents those won't update automatically. Instead, just reload. Maybe we'll ajax this stuff some day, but it feels like a net negative for now.
- Also remove it from other applications where it's currently used.
- Fix an issue with inline previews.
Test Plan: Made some comments on a mock, everything worked normally like I expected it to.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T5424
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D9649
Summary: Ref T4986. Instead of requiring users to know the name of an application search engine class, let them select from a list.
Test Plan:
Created a new panel.
{F165468}
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T4986
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D9500
Summary: Ran `arc lint --apply-patches --everything` over rP, mainly to change double quotes to single quotes where appropriate. These changes also validate that the `ArcanistXHPASTLinter::LINT_DOUBLE_QUOTE` rule is working as expected.
Test Plan: Eyeballed it.
Reviewers: #blessed_reviewers, epriestley
Reviewed By: #blessed_reviewers, epriestley
Subscribers: epriestley, Korvin, hach-que
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D9431
Summary:
Merge "Organization" and "Communication" into "Core". The split between these three was always tenuous, and this is easier to use and nicer looking on the new launcher.
Merge "Miscellaneous" into "Utilities" since they're basically the same thing.
Test Plan: Looked at app launcher.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Subscribers: epriestley
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D9334
Summary:
This probably needs some tweaks, but the idea is to make it easier to browse and access applications without necessarily needing them to be on the homepage.
Open to feedback.
Test Plan:
(This screenshot merges "Organization", "Communication" and "Core" into a single "Core" group. We can't actually do this yet because it wrecks the homepage.)
{F160052}
Reviewers: btrahan, chad
Reviewed By: chad
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T5176
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D9297
Summary: The removes the sprite sheet 'icons' and replaces it with FontAwesome fonts.
Test Plan:
- Grep for SPRITE_ICONS and replace
- Grep for sprite-icons and replace
- Grep for PhabricatorActionList and choose all new icons
- Grep for Crumbs and fix icons
- Test/Replace PHUIList Icon support
- Test/Replace ObjectList Icon support (foot, epoch, etc)
- Browse as many pages as I could get to
- Remove sprite-icons and move remarkup to own sheet
- Review this diff in Differential
Reviewers: btrahan, epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: epriestley, Korvin, hach-que
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D9052
Summary: Ref T4986. Getting closer. Nothing out of the ordinary in this group.
Test Plan:
For each application:
- Viewed the normal search results.
- Created a panel version and viewed it.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T4986
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D9024
Summary: A small but appreciable number of users find flavor on buttons confusing. Remove this flavor. This retains flavor in headers, error messages, etc., which doesn't cause confusion.
Test Plan: Looked at a revision, task, paste, macro, etc.
Reviewers: chad, btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D8812
Summary:
Ref T4810. Ultimate goal is to let Harbormaster post a "build passed/failed" transaction. To prepare for that, implement `PhabricatorApplicationTransactionInterface` in Differential.
To allow Harbormaster to take action on //diffs// but have the transactions apply to //revisions//, I added a new method so that objects can redirect transactions to some other object.
Test Plan:
- Subscribed/unsubscribed/attached/detached from Differential, saw transactions appear properly.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T4810
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D8802
Summary: This "Reply to comment, etc., etc." section got lost along the way at some point. Restore it for transaction mail.
Test Plan: Received mail from Maniphest with reply instructions.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D8700
Summary: Update notes, important, and warnings to look different than codeblocks.
Test Plan: test in diviner and legalpad
Reviewers: btrahan, epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: epriestley, Korvin, chad, avivey
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D8592
