Summary:
Ref T13425. Currently, code inputs and all outputs are grouped into a single block. This is fine for display notebooks but not great for diffing notebooks.
Instead, split source code input into individual lines with one line per block, and each output into its own block.
This allows you to leave actual line-by-line inlines on source, and comment on outputs individually.
Test Plan: {F6888583}
Maniphest Tasks: T13425
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D20840
Summary:
Depends on D20834. Ref T13425. After the change from "th" to "td" for accessibility, the algorithm picks which cells it should highlight slightly improperly (it picks too many cells since it can no longer find the line numbers).
Ideally, it would probably highlight //only// the source content, but there isn't an easy way to do this right now. Settle for an incremental improvement for the moment.
Test Plan: Hovered over line numbers, saw a more accurate highlight area.
Maniphest Tasks: T13425
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D20835
Summary:
Depends on D20831. Ref T13425. As an escape hatch to get out of future DocumentEngine rendering behavior, provide a "View As.." option.
Now I can break DocumentEngine real bad and no one can complain.
Test Plan: Used "View As" to swap document engines for image files.
Maniphest Tasks: T13425
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D20832
Summary: Ref T13279. Fix some tabular stuff, draw areas better, make the "compose()" API more consistent, unfatal the demo chart, unfatal the project burndown, make the project chart do something roughly physical.
Test Plan: Looked at charts, saw fewer obvious horrors.
Subscribers: yelirekim
Maniphest Tasks: T13279
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D20817
Summary: Ref T13279. We currently draw a point on the chart for each datapoint, but this leads to many overlapping circles. Instead, aggregate the raw points into display points ("events") at the end.
Test Plan: Viewed a stacked area chart with many points, saw a more palatable number of drawn dots.
Subscribers: yelirekim
Maniphest Tasks: T13279
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D20814
Summary:
Fixes T7961. Currently, we present Herald users with actions like "Require legalpad signatures" and "Run build plans" even if Legalpad and Harbormaster are not installed.
Instead, allow fields and actions to be made "unavailable", which means that we won't present them as options when adding to new or existing rules.
If you edit a rule which already uses one of these fields or actions, it isn't affected.
Test Plan:
- Created a rule with a legalpad action, uninstalled legalpad, edited the rule. Action remained untouched.
- Created a new rule, wasn't offered the legalpad action.
- Reinstalled the application, saw the action again.
Subscribers: PHID-OPKG-gm6ozazyms6q6i22gyam
Maniphest Tasks: T7961
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D20808
Summary:
Ref T4900. When a card is edited, we currently emit an update notification for all the projects the task is tagged with. This isn't quite the right set:
- We want to emit notifications for projects the task //was previously// tagged with, so it can be removed from boards it should no longer be part of.
- We want to emit notifications for ancestors of projects the task is or was tagged with, so parent project boards can be updated.
- However, we don't need to emit notifications for projects that don't actually have workboards.
Adjust the notification set to align better to these rules.
Test Plan:
- Removal of Parent Project: Edited a task on board "A > B", removing the "B" project tag. Saw board A update in another window.
- Normal Update: Edited a task title on board X, saw board X update in another window.
- Used `bin/aphlict debug` to inspect the notification set, saw generally sensible-seeming data going over the wire.
Reviewers: amckinley
Maniphest Tasks: T4900
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D20680
Summary:
Depends on D20654. Ref T4900. When a task is edited, emit a "workboards" event for all boards it appears on (in a future change, this should also include all boards it //previously// appeared on, and all parents of both sets of boards -- but I'm just getting things working for now).
When we receive a "workboards" event, check if the visible board should be updated.
Aphlict has a complicated intra-window leader/follower election system which could let us process this update event exactly once no matter how many windows a user has open with the same workboard. I'm not trying to do any of this since it seems fairly rare. It makes sense for events like "you have new notifications" where we don't want to generate 100 Ajax calls if the user has 100 windows open, but very few users seem likely to have 100 copies of the same workboard open.
Test Plan:
- Ran `bin/aphlict debug`.
- Opened workboard A in two windows, X and Y.
- Edited and moved tasks in window X.
- Saw "workboards" messages in the Aphlict log.
- Saw window Y update in nearly-real-time (locally, this is fast enough that it feels instantaneous).
Then:
- Stopped the Aphlcit server.
- Edited a task.
- Started the Aphlict server.
- Saw window Y update after a few moments (i.e., update in response to a reconnect).
Reviewers: amckinley
Reviewed By: amckinley
Maniphest Tasks: T4900
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D20656
Summary:
Depends on D20653. Ref T4900. Pass ordering details to the reload endpoint so it can give the client accurate ordering/header information in the response.
The removed comment mentions this, but here's why this is a difficult mess:
- In window A, view a board with "Group by: Owner" and no tasks owned by "Alice". Since "Alice" owns no tasks, this means the columns do not have an "Assigned to: Alice" header!
- In window B, edit task T and assign it to Alice.
- In window A, press "R".
Window A now not only needs to update to properly reflect the state of task T, it actually needs to draw a new "Assigned to: Alice" header in every column.
Fortunately, the "group by" code anticipates this being a big mess, is fairly careful about handling it, and the client can handle this state change and the actual code change here isn't too involved. This is just causing a lot of not-very-obvious indirect effects in the pipeline to handle these situations that need complex redraws.
Test Plan:
- After making various normal edits/creates/moves in window A, pressed "R" in window B. Saw ordering reflected correctly after sync.
- Went through the whole "Group by: Owner" + assign to unrepresented owner flow above. After pressing "R", saw "Assigned to: Alice" appear on the board.
Reviewers: amckinley
Reviewed By: amckinley
Maniphest Tasks: T4900
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D20654
Summary:
Depends on D20652. Ref T4900. When the user presses "R", send a list of cards currently visible on the client and their version numbers.
On the server:
- Compare the client verisons to the server versions so we can skip updates for objects which have not changed. (For now, the client version is always "1" and the server version is always "2", so this doesn't do anything meaningful, and every card is always updated.)
- Compare the client visible set to the server visible set and "remove" any cards which have been removed from the board.
I believe this means that "R" always puts the board into the right state (except for some issues with client orderings not being fully handled yet). It's not tremendously efficient, but we can make versioning better (using the largest object transaction ID) to improve that and loading the page in the first place doesn't take all that long so even sending down the full visible set shouldn't be a huge problem.
Test Plan:
- In window A, removed a card from a board.
- In window B, pressed "R" and saw the removal reflected on the client.
- (Also added cards, edited cards, etc., and didn't catch anything exploding.)
Reviewers: amckinley
Reviewed By: amckinley
Maniphest Tasks: T4900
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D20653
Summary:
Depends on D20639. Ref T4900. Currently, "BoardResponseEngine" has a `setObjectPHID()` method. This is called after edit operations to mean "we just edited object X, so we know it needs to be updated".
Move toward `setUpdatePHIDs(...)` in all cases, with `setUpdatePHIDs(array(the-object-we-just-edited))` as a special case of that. After this change, callers pass:
- An optional list of PHIDs they know need to be updated on the client. Today, this is always be a card we just edited (on edit/move flows), or a sort of made-up list of PHIDs for the moment (when you press "R"). In the future, the "R" endpoint will do a better job of figuring out a more realistic update set.
- An optional list of PHIDs currently visible on the client. This is used to update ordering details and mark cards for removal. This is currently passed by edit/move, but not by pressing "R" (it will be in the future).
- An optional list of objects. The "R" workflow has to load these anyway, so we can save a couple queries by letting callers pass them. For now, the edit/move flows still rely on the engine to figure out what it needs to load.
This does very little to actually change client behavior, it mostly just paves the way for the next update to the "R" workflow to make it handle add/remove cases properly.
Test Plan:
- Edited and moved cards on a workboard.
- Pressed "R" to reload a workboard.
Neither of these operations seem any worse off than they were before. They still don't fully work:
- When you edit a card and delete the current workboard project from it, it remains visible. This is also the behavior on `master`. This is sort of intentional since we don't necessarily want to make these cards suddenly disappear? Ideally, we would probably have some kind of "tombstone" state where the card can still be edited but can't be dragged, and the next explicit user interaction would clean up old tombstones. This interaction is very rare and I don't think it's particularly important to specialize.
- When a card is removed from the board, "R" can't currently figure out that it should be removed from the client. This is because the client does not yet pass a "visiblePHIDs" state. It will in an upcoming change.
- The "R" flow always sends a full set of card updates, and can not yet detect that some cards have not changed.
- There's a TODO, but some ordering stuff isn't handled yet.
Reviewers: amckinley
Reviewed By: amckinley
Maniphest Tasks: T4900
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D20652
Summary:
Depends on D20638. Ref T4900. This is an incremental step toward proper workboard updates.
Currently, the client can mostly update its view because we do updates when you edit or move a card, and the client and server know how to send lists of card updates, so a lot of the work is already done.
However, the code assumes we're only updating/redrawing one card at a time. Make the client accept and process multiple card updates.
In future changes, I'll add versioning (so we only update cards that have actually changed), fix the "TODO" around ordering, and move toward actual Aphlict-based real-time updates.
Test Plan:
- Opened the same workboard in two windows.
- Edited cards in one window, pressed "R" (capital letter, with no modifier keys) to reload the second window.
- Saw edits and moves reflected accurately after sync, except for some special cases of header/order interaction (see "TODO").
Reviewers: amckinley
Reviewed By: amckinley
Maniphest Tasks: T4900
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D20639
Summary: Depends on D20637. Ref T4900. This is some ancient dead code that nothing uses.
Test Plan: Grepped for `updateCard()` to verify it's private. Searched for "options" and "dirtyColumn" and got no hits.
Reviewers: amckinley
Reviewed By: amckinley
Maniphest Tasks: T4900
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D20638
Summary: Ref T13279. Makes charts incrementally more useful by allowing the server to provide labels and colors for functions.
Test Plan: {F6438872}
Reviewers: amckinley
Reviewed By: amckinley
Subscribers: yelirekim
Maniphest Tasks: T13279
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D20501
Summary:
Ref T13279. Adds client-side support for rendering function labels on charts, then labels every function as important data.
Works okay on mobile, although I'm not planning to target mobile terribly heavily for v0.
Test Plan: {F6438860}
Reviewers: amckinley
Reviewed By: amckinley
Subscribers: yelirekim
Maniphest Tasks: T13279
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D20500
Summary:
Ref T13279. This adds support for:
- Datasets can have types, like "stacked area".
- Datasets can have multiple functions.
- Charts can store dataset types and datasets with multiple functions.
- Adds a "stacked area" dataset.
- Makes D3 actually draw a stacked area chart.
Lots of rough edges here still, but the result looks slightly more like it's supposed to look.
D3 can do some of this logic itself, like adding up the area stacks on top of one another with `d3.stack()`. I'm doing it in PHP instead because I think it's a bit easier to debug, and it gives us more options for things like caching or "export to CSV" or "export to API" or rendering a data table under the chart or whatever.
Test Plan: {F6427780}
Reviewers: amckinley
Reviewed By: amckinley
Subscribers: yelirekim
Maniphest Tasks: T13279
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D20498
Summary: Depends on D20486. Ref T13279. Now that the "Reports" UI uses a panel to draw a real chart from Facts, throw away the copy of the old code.
Test Plan: `grep`
Reviewers: amckinley
Reviewed By: amckinley
Maniphest Tasks: T13279
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D20487
Summary:
Ref T13279. Charting changes alter how the "line-chart" behavior works, but the "Burnup Chart" still relies on the old behavior.
Although I'm intending to remove "Maniphest > Reports" once Facts is a minimally sufficient replacement, copy this behavior to keep it working until we're ready to pull the trigger.
Also fix a leftover typo from D20435.
Test Plan: Viewed a legacy Maniphest burnup rate report.
Reviewers: amckinley
Reviewed By: amckinley
Maniphest Tasks: T13279
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D20449
Summary:
Depends on D20439. Ref T13279. Some day, charts will probably need to reload themselves or do a bunch of defer/request-shaping magic when they're on a dashboard with 900 other charts.
Give the controller separate "HTML placeholder" and "actual data" modes, and make the placeholder fetch the data in a separate request.
Then, make the chart redraw if you resize the window instead of staying at whatever size it started as.
Test Plan:
- Loaded a chart, saw it load data asynchronously.
- Resized the window, saw the chart resize.
Reviewers: amckinley
Reviewed By: amckinley
Subscribers: yelirekim
Maniphest Tasks: T13279
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D20440
Summary:
Ref T13279. I think I'm going to fling some stuff at the wall for a bit here and hope most of it sticks, so this series of changes may not be terribly cohesive or focused. Here:
The range of the chart is locked to "[0, 105% of max]". This is trying to make a pleasing extra margin above the maximum value, but currently just breaks charts with negative values. Later:
- I'll probably let users customize this.
- We should likely select 0 as the automatic minimum for charts with no negative values.
- For charts with positive values, it would be nice to automatically pick a pleasantly round number (25, 100, 1000) as a maximum by default.
We don't have any storage for charts yet. Add some. This works like queries, where every possible configuration gets a short URL slug. Nothing writes or reads this yet.
Rename `fn()` to `css_function()`. This builds CSS functions for D3. The JS is likely to get substantial structural rewrites later on, `fn()` was just particularly offensive.
Test Plan: Viewed a fact series with negative values. Ran `bin/storage upgrade`.
Reviewers: amckinley
Reviewed By: amckinley
Subscribers: yelirekim, PHID-OPKG-gm6ozazyms6q6i22gyam
Maniphest Tasks: T13279
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D20438
Summary:
Ref T13269. See D20329. When we switch trigger rule control types, reset the rule value.
Also, pick slightly nicer defaults for status/priority.
Test Plan:
- Created a "Change Status To: X" rule.
- Saved it.
- Edited it.
- Selected "Assign to" for the existing action's dropdown.
- Before: tokenizer filled with nonsense.
- After: tokenizer cleared.
Reviewers: amckinley
Reviewed By: amckinley
Maniphest Tasks: T13269
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D20416
Summary:
Depends on D20414. Ref T13272. Several minor things here:
- Currently, you can drag panels underneath the invisible "there are no items in this column" div and the "Create Panel / Add Existing Panel" buttons. This is silly; stop it.
- Currently, when viewing a tab panel on a dashboard, you can drag the panels inside it. This is extremely silly. Make "movable" off by default and pass it through the async flow only when we actually need it.
- Make the whole "Add Tab..." virtual tab clickable to open the dropdown. This removes the rare exception/todo combo I added earlier. {key F}
- Add or remove some icons or something.
Test Plan: Moved panels around on dashboards. Tried to drag panels inside tab panels. Added tab. Things were less obviously broken.
Reviewers: amckinley
Reviewed By: amckinley
Maniphest Tasks: T13272
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D20415
Summary: Depends on D20408. Ref T13272. The actual JS is still a little bit iffy, but this makes the server side "move" operation work correctly by updating it to use the same code as everything else.
Test Plan: Moved panels around on single-column and multi-column dashboards, saw them move to reasonable places and stay there when I reloaded the page.
Reviewers: amckinley
Reviewed By: amckinley
Maniphest Tasks: T13272
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D20409
Summary:
Depends on D20407. Ref T13272. This updates the "add panel" (which has two flavors: "add existing" and "create new") and "remove panel" flows to work with the new duplicate-friendly storage format.
- We now modify panels by "panelKey", not by panel PHID, so one dashboard may have multiple copies of the same panel and we can still figure out what's going on.
- We now work with "contextPHID", not "dashboardID", to make some flows with tab panels (or other nested panels in the future) easier.
The only major remaining flow is the Javascript "move panels around with drag-and-drop" flow.
Test Plan:
- Added panels to a dashboard with "Create New Panel".
- Added panels to a dashboard with "Add Existing Panel".
- Removed panels from a dashboard.
- Added and removed duplicate panels, got a correctly-functioning dashboard that didn't care about duplicates.
Reviewers: amckinley
Reviewed By: amckinley
Maniphest Tasks: T13272
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D20408
Summary:
Depends on D20396. Ref T13272. Currently, using the dropdowns to edit a tab panel from a dashboard redirects you to the tab panel page.
Instead, redirect back to the context page (usually, a dashboard -- but theoretically a containing tab panel, since you can put tab panels inside tab panels).
Also, fix some JS issues with non-integer panel keys. I've moved panel keys from "0, 1, 2, ..." to having arbitrary keys to make some operations less flimsy/error-prone, but this needs some JS tweaks.
Test Plan: Edited a tab panel from a dashboard, got sent sensibly back to the dashboard.
Reviewers: amckinley
Reviewed By: amckinley
Maniphest Tasks: T13272
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D20397
Summary:
Ref T13272. In edit mode, tab panels now have a dropdown menu. However, this sort of overrlaps with the actual action of clicking the tab to select it.
Separate these into different click targets so that "select tab X" and "open dropdown menu for X" are different operations.
This is more work than it appears because:
- We have an "action icon" already, used when you put a dashboard on a portal/home to create an "Edit" link. It makes sense to attach dropdowns to this, but it has some hard-coded stuff.
- In applications with a "Create <thing>" in the crumbs (like Maniphest), we may use a dropdown menu if there are multiple create forms available. However, this menu renders in a weird way by reading all the properties out of an actual "View" object and building something else.
- The "list of tabs" stuff shares code with different "list of tabs" navigation used by Diffusion and Instances.
..but I think I fixed everything and didn't break anything.
Test Plan:
- Clicked "select tab" and "open dropdown menu" as separate actions.
- Viewed Diffusion, Maniphest with multiple create forms, Instances.
Reviewers: amckinley
Reviewed By: amckinley
Maniphest Tasks: T13272
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D20396
Summary: Depends on D20345. Use a narrower layout for very large graphs to save some space.
Test Plan:
Before:
{F6320215}
After:
{F6320216}
This does not affect smaller graphs.
Reviewers: amckinley
Reviewed By: amckinley
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D20346
Summary: Ref T13269. I refactored this late in the game to organize things better and add table cells around stuff, and accidentally broke the relationship between the "Rule Type" selector and the value selector.
Test Plan: Switched rule type selector from "Change Status" to "Play Sound", saw secondary control update properly.
Reviewers: amckinley
Reviewed By: amckinley
Maniphest Tasks: T13269
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D20326
Summary:
Depends on D20321. Fixes T12175. Ref T13074. Now that before/after PHIDs are suggestions, we can give the server a more complete view of what the client is trying to do so we're more likely to get a good outcome if the client view is out of date.
Instead of passing only the one directly adjacent card PHID, pass all the card PHIDs that the client thinks are in the same group.
(For gigantic columns with tens of thousands of tasks this might need some tweaking -- like, slice both lists down to 10 items -- but we can cross that bridge when we come to it.)
Test Plan:
- Dragged some cards around to top/bottom/middle positions, saw good positioning in all cases.
- In two windows, dragged stuff around on the same board. At least at first glance, conflicting simultaneous edits seemed to do reasonable things.
Reviewers: amckinley
Reviewed By: amckinley
Maniphest Tasks: T13074, T12175
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D20322
Summary:
Depends on D20320. Ref T12175. Ref T13074. Currently, when you move a card between columns, the internal transaction takes exactly one `afterPHID` or `beforePHID` and moves the card before or after the specified card.
This is a fairly strict interpretation and causes a number of practical issues, mostly because the user/client view of the board may be out of date and the card they're dragging before or after may no longer exist: another user might have moved or hidden it between the last client update and the current time.
In T13074, we also run into a more subtle issue where a card that incorrectly appears in multiple columns fatals when dropped before or after itself.
In all cases, a better behavior is just to complete the move and accept that the position may not end up exactly like the user specified. We could prompt the user instead:
> You tried to drop this card after card X, but that card has moved since you last loaded the board. Reload the board and try again.
...but this is pretty hostile and probably rarely/never what the user wants.
Instead, accept a list of before/after PHIDs and just try them until we find one that works, or accept a default position if none work. In essentially all cases, this means that the move "just works" like users expect it to instead of fataling in a confusing/disruptive/undesirable (but "technically correct") way.
(A followup will make the client JS send more beforePHIDs/afterPHIDs so this works more often.)
We could eventually add a "strict" mode in the API or something if there's some bot/API use case for precise behavior here, but I suspect none exist today or are (ever?) likely to exist in the future.
Test Plan:
- (T13074) Inserted two conflicting rows to put a card on two columns on the same board. Dropped one version of it underneath the other version. Before: confusing fatal. After: cards merge sensibly into one consistent card.
- (T12175) Opened two views of a board. Moved card A to a different column on the first view. On the second view, dropped card B under card A (still showing in the old column). Before: confusing fatal. After: card ended up in the right column in approximately the right place, very reasonably.
Reviewers: amckinley
Reviewed By: amckinley
Maniphest Tasks: T13074, T12175
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D20321
Summary:
Depends on D20308. Ref T5474. The element which previews what will happen when you drop a task somewhere can cover the bottom part of the rightmost column on a workboard.
To fix this, I'm trying to just fade it out if you put your cursor over it. I tried to do this in a simple way previously (":hover" + "opacity: 0.25") but it doesn't actually work because "pointer-events: none" stops ":hover" from working.
Instead, do this in Javascript. This is a little more complicated but: it works; and we can do the fade when you get //near// the element instead of actually over it, which feels a little better.
Test Plan:
- Shrank window to fairly small size so that the preview could cover up stuff on the workboard.
- Dragged a card toward the rightmost column.
- Before: drop action preview covered some workboard stuff.
- After: preview faded out as my cursor approached.
Reviewers: amckinley
Reviewed By: amckinley
Maniphest Tasks: T5474
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D20320
Summary:
Ref T5474. Allow columns to play a sound when tasks are dropped.
This is a little tricky because Safari has changed somewhat recently to require some gymnastics to play sounds when the user didn't explicitly click something. Preloading the sound on the first mouse interaction, then playing and immediately pausing it seems to work, though.
Test Plan: Added a trigger with 5 sounds. In Safari, Chrome, and Firefox, dropped a card into the column. In all browsers, heard a nice sequence of 5 sounds played one after the other.
Reviewers: amckinley
Reviewed By: amckinley
Maniphest Tasks: T5474
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D20306
Summary:
Ref T13074. If you hit a prompt on a drop operation (today: MFA; in the future, maybe "add a comment" or "assign this task"), we currently leave the board in a bad semi-frozen state if you cancel the workflow by pressing "Cancel" on the dialog.
Instead, put things back the way they were.
Test Plan: Dragged an MFA-required card, cancelled the MFA prompt, got a functional board instead of a semi-frozen board I needed to reload.
Reviewers: amckinley
Reviewed By: amckinley
Maniphest Tasks: T13074
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D20305
Summary:
Ref T5474. The first rough cut of triggers showed some of the trigger rules in a tooltip when you hover over the "add/remove" trigger menu.
This isn't great since we don't have much room and it's a bit finnicky / hard to read.
Since we have a better way to show effects now in the drop preview, just use that instead. When you hover over the trigger menu, preview the trigger in the "drop effect" element, with a "Trigger: such-and-such" header.
Test Plan:
- This is pretty tough to screenshot.
- Hovered over menu, got a sensible preview of the trigger effects.
- Dragged a card over the menu, no preview.
Reviewers: amckinley
Reviewed By: amckinley
Maniphest Tasks: T5474
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D20304
Summary:
Ref T5474. This provides a Herald-like UI for editing workboard trigger rules.
This probably has some missing pieces and doesn't actually save anything to the database yet, but the basics at least roughly work.
Test Plan: {F6299886}
Reviewers: amckinley
Reviewed By: amckinley
Maniphest Tasks: T5474
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D20301
Summary:
Ref T10335. When you (for example) drag a "Resolved" task into a column with "Trigger: change status to resolved.", don't show a hint that the action will "Change status to resolved." since this isn't helpful and is somewhat confusing.
For now, the only visibility operator is "!=" since all current actions are simple field comparisons, but some actions in the future (like "add subscriber" or "remove project") might need other conditions.
Test Plan:
Dragged cards in ways that previously provided useless hints: move from column A to column B on a "Group by Priority" board; drag a resolved task to a "Trigger: change status to as resolved" column. Saw a more accurate preview in both cases.
Drags which actually cause effects still show the effects correctly.
Reviewers: amckinley
Reviewed By: amckinley
Maniphest Tasks: T10335
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D20300
Summary:
Ref T10335. Ref T5474. When you drag-and-drop a card on a workboard, show a UI hint which lists all the things that the operation will do.
This shows: column moves; changes because of dragging a card to a different header; and changes which will be caused by triggers.
Not implemented here:
- Actions are currently shown even if they have no effect. For example, if you drag a "Normal" task to a different column, it says "Change priority to Normal.". I plan to hide actions which have no effect, but figuring this out is a little bit tricky.
- I'd like to make "trigger effects" vs "non-trigger effects" a little more clear in the future, probably.
Test Plan:
Dragged stuff between columns and headers, and into columns with triggers. Got appropriate preview text hints previewing what the action would do in the UI.
(This is tricky to take a screenshot of since it only shows up while the mouse cursor is down.)
Reviewers: amckinley
Reviewed By: amckinley
Maniphest Tasks: T10335, T5474
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D20299
Summary:
Depends on D20274. Ref T10578. This is en route to an ordering by points, it's just a simpler half-step on the way there.
Allow columns to be sorted by creation date, so the newest tasks rise to the top.
In this ordering you can never reposition cards, since editing a creation date by dragging makes no sense. This will be true of the "points" ordering too (although we could imagine doing something like prompting the user, some day).
Test Plan: Viewed boards by "natural" (allows reordering both when dragging within and between columns), "priority" (reorder only within columns), and "creation date" (reorder never). Dragged cards around between and within columns, got apparently sensible behavior.
Reviewers: amckinley
Reviewed By: amckinley
Maniphest Tasks: T10578
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D20275
Summary:
Depends on D20273. Fixes T10722. Currently, we don't make it very clear when a card can't be edited. Long ago, some code made a weak attempt to do this (by hiding the "grip" on the card), but later UI changes hid the "grip" unconditionally so that mooted things.
Instead:
- Replace the edit pencil with a red lock.
- Provide cursor hints for grabbable / not grabbable.
- Don't let users pick up cards they can't edit.
Test Plan: On a workboard with a mixture of editable and not-editable cards, hovered over the different cards and was able to figure out which ones I could drag or not drag pretty easily. Picked up cards I could pick up, wasn't able to drag cards I can't edit.
Reviewers: amckinley
Reviewed By: amckinley
Maniphest Tasks: T10722
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D20274
Summary:
Depends on D20271. Ref T10333. When a column is empty but a board is grouped (by priority, owner, etc) render the headers properly.
When a column has headers, don't apply the "empty" style even if it has no cards. This style just makes some empty space so you can drag-and-drop more easily, but headers do the same thing.
Test Plan: {F6264611}
Reviewers: amckinley
Reviewed By: amckinley
Maniphest Tasks: T10333
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D20272
Summary:
Depends on D20267. Depends on D20268. Ref T10333. Currently, we support "Natural" and "Priority" orders, but a lot of the particulars are pretty hard-coded, including some logic in `ManiphestTask`.
Although it's not clear that we'll ever put other types of objects on workboards, it seems generally bad that you need to modify `ManiphestTask` to get a new ordering.
Pull the ordering logic out into a `ProjectColumnOrder` hierarchy instead, and let each ordering define the things it needs to work (name, icon, what headers look like, how different objects are sorted, and how to apply an edit when you drop an object under a header).
Then move the existing "Natural" and "Priority" orders into this new hierarchy.
This has a minor bug where using the "Edit" workflow to change a card's priority on a priority-ordered board doesn't fully refresh card/header order since the response isn't ordering-aware. I'll fix that in an upcoming change.
Test Plan: Grouped workboards by "Natural" and "Priority", dragged stuff around within and between columns, grepped for all touched symbols.
Reviewers: amckinley
Reviewed By: amckinley
Maniphest Tasks: T10333
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D20269
Summary:
Depends on D20266. Boards currently have several `whateverMap<cardPHID => stuff>` properties, but we can just move these all down into a `CardTemplate`, similar to the recently introduced `HeaderTemplate`.
The `CardTemplate` holds all the global information for a card, and then `Card` is specific for a particular copy in a column. Today, each `CardTemplate` has one `Card`, but a `CardTemplate` may have more than one card in the future (when we add subproject columns).
Test Plan: Viewed workboards in different sort orders and dragged stuff around, grepped for all affected symbols.
Reviewers: amckinley
Reviewed By: amckinley
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D20267
Summary:
Depends on D20263. Ref T10333. I want to add groups like "Assignee" to workboards. This means you may have several tasks grouped under, say, "Alice".
When you drag the bottom-most task under "Alice" to the top, what does that mean?
Today, the only grouping is "Priority", and it means "change the task's secret/hidden global subpriority". However, this seems to generally be a somewhat-bad answer, and is quite complex. It also doesn't make much sense for an author grouping, since one task can't really be "more assigned" to Alice than another task.
Users likely intend this operation to mean "move it, visually, with no other effects" -- that is, user intent is to shuffle sticky notes around on a board, not edit anything substantive. The meaning is probably something like "this is similar to other nearby tasks" or "maybe this is a good place to start", which we can't really capture with any top-level attribute.
We could extend "subpriority" and give tasks a secret/hidden "sub-assignment strength" and so on, but this seems like a bad road to walk down. We'll also run into trouble later when subproject columns may appear on the board, and a user could want to put a task in different positions on different subprojects, conceivably.
In the "Natural" order view, we already have what is probably a generally better approach for this: a task display order particular to the column, that just remembers where you put the sticky notes.
Move away from "subpriority", and toward a world where we mostly keep sticky notes where you stuck them and move them around only when we have to. With no grouping, we still sort by "natural" order, as before. With priority grouping, we now sort by `<priority, natural>`. When you drag stuff around inside a priority group, we update the natural order.
This means that moving cards around on a "priority" board will also move them around on a "natural" board, at least somewhat. I think this is okay. If it's not intuitive, we could give every ordering its own separate "natural" view, so we remember where you stuck stuff on the "priority" board but that doesn't affect the "Natural" board. But I suspect we won't need to.
Test Plan:
- Viewed and dragged a natural board.
- Viewed and dragged a priority board.
- Dragged within and between groups of 0, 1, and multiple items.
Reviewers: amckinley
Reviewed By: amckinley
Maniphest Tasks: T10333
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D20265
Summary:
Ref T13074. Today, in normal task list views in Maniphest (not workboards), you can (sometimes) reorder tasks if the view is priority-sorted.
I suspect no one ever does this, few users know it's supported, and that it was basically rendered obsolete the day we shipped workboards.
This also means that we need to maintain a global "subpriority" for tasks, which distinguishes between different tasks at the same priority level (e.g., "High") and maintains a consistent ordering on workboards.
As we move toward making workboards more flexible (e.g., group by author / owner / custom fields), I'd like to try moving away from "subpriority" and possibly removing it entirely, in favor of "natural order", which basically means "we kind of remember where you put the card and it works a bit like a sticky note".
Currently, the "natural order" and "subpriority" systems are sort of similar but also sort of in conflict, and the "subpriority" system can't really be extended while the "natural order / column position" system can.
The only real reason to have a global "subpriority" is to support the list-view drag-and-drop.
It's possible I'm wrong about this and a bunch of users love this feature, but we can re-evaluate if we get feedback in this vein.
(This just removes UI, the actual subpriority system is still intact and still used on workboards.)
Test Plan: Viewed task lists, was no longer able to drag stuff. Grepped for affected symbols. Dragged stuff in remaining grippable lists, like "Edit Forms" in EditEngine config.
Reviewers: amckinley
Reviewed By: amckinley
Maniphest Tasks: T13074
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D20263
Summary:
Ref T10333. Ref T8135. Depends on D20247. Allow users to drag-and-drop cards on a priority-sorted workboard under headers, even if the header has no other cards.
As of D20247, headers show up but they aren't really interactive. Now, you can drag cards directly underneath a header (instead of only between other cards). For example, if a column has only one "Wishlist" task, you may drag it under the "High", "Normal", or "Low" priority headers to select a specific priority.
(Some of this code still feels a little rough, but I think it will generalize once other types of sorting are available.)
Test Plan: Dragged cards within and between priority groups, saw appropriate priority edits applied in every case I could come up with.
Reviewers: amckinley
Reviewed By: amckinley
Maniphest Tasks: T10333, T8135
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D20248
Summary:
Ref T10333. When workboards are ordered (for example, by priority), add headers to the various groups. Major goals are:
- Allow users to drag-and-drop to set values that no cards currently have: for example, you can change a card priority to "normal" by dragging it under the "normal" header, even if no other cards in the column are currently "Normal".
- Make future orderings more useful, particularly "order by assignee". We don't really have room to put the username on every card and it would create a fair amount of clutter, but we can put usernames in these headers and then reference them with just the profile picture. This also allows you to assign to users who are not currently assigned anything in a given column.
- Make the drag-and-drop behavior more obvious by showing what it will do more clearly (see T8135).
- Make things a little easier to scan in general: because space on cards is limited, some information isn't conveyed very clearly (for example, priority information is currently conveyed //only// through color, which can be hard to pick out visually and is probably not functional for users who need vision accommodations).
- Maybe do "swimlanes": this is pretty much a "swimlanes" UI if we add whitespace at the bottom of each group so that the headers line up across all the columns (e.g., "Normal" is at the same y-axis position in every column as you scroll down the page). Not sold on this being useful, but it's just a UI adjustment if we do want to try it.
NOTE: This only makes these headers work for display.
They aren't yet recognized as targets by the drag list UI, so you can't drag cards into an empty group. I'll tackle that in a followup.
Test Plan: {F6257686}
Reviewers: amckinley
Reviewed By: amckinley
Maniphest Tasks: T10333
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D20247
Summary:
Ref T10334. Partly, this just improves visual feedback for all drag operations. After D20242, we can have cases where you (for example) drag a low-priority node to a very tall column on a priority-ordered workboard. In this case, the actual dashed-border-drop-target may not be on screen.
We might make the column scroll or put some kind of hint in the UI in this case, but an easy starting point is just to make the "yes, you're targeting this column" state a bit more clear.
Test Plan: Dragged tasks between columns, saw the border higlight on the target columns. This is very tricky to take a screenshot of.
Reviewers: amckinley
Reviewed By: amckinley
Maniphest Tasks: T10334
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D20245
Summary:
Ref T10334. When a workboard is ordered by priority, dragging from column "A" to a particular place in column "B" currently means "move this task to column B, and adjust its priority so that it naturally sorts into the location under my mouse cursor".
Users frequently find this confusing / undesirable.
To begin improving this, make "drag from column A to column B" and "drag from somewhere in column A to somewhere else in column A" into different operations. The first operation, a movement between columns, no longer implies an ordering change. The second action still does.
So if you actually want to change the priority of a task, you drag it within its current column. If you just want to move it to a different column, you drag it between columns.
This creates some possible problems:
- Some users may love the current behavior and just not be very vocal about it. I doubt it, but presumably we'll hear from them if we break it.
- If you actualy want to move + reorder, it's a bit more cumbersome now. We could possibly add something like "shift + drag" for this if there's feedback.
- The new behavior is probably less surprising, but may not be much more obvious. Future changes (for example, in T10335) should help make it more clear.
- When you mouse cursor goes over column B, the card dashed-rectangle preview target thing jumps to the correct position in the column -- but that may not be under your mouse cursor. This feels pretty much fine if the whole column fits on screen. It may not be so great if the column does not fit on screen and the dashed-rectangle-thing has vanished. This is just a UI feedback issue and we could refine this later (scroll/highlight the column).
Test Plan:
- Created several tasks at different priority levels, sorted a board by priority, dragged tasks between columns. Dragging from "A" to "B" no longer causes a priority edit.
- Also, dragged within a column. This still performs priority edits.
Reviewers: amckinley
Reviewed By: amckinley
Maniphest Tasks: T10334
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D20242
Summary:
Ref T12822. Ref PHI878. This is some leftover code from the old selection behavior that prevented visual selection of the left side of a diff if the user clicked on the right -- basically, a much simpler attack on what ultimately landed in D20191.
I think the change from `th` to `td` "broke" it so it didn't interfere with the other behavior, which is why I didn't have to remove it earlier. It's no longer necessary, in any case.
Test Plan: Grepped for behavior name, selected stuff on both sides of a diff.
Reviewers: amckinley
Reviewed By: amckinley
Maniphest Tasks: T12822
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D20196
